Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2020 Jun 23;31:105899. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105899

Modelling of surface river plume using set-up and input data files of Delft-3D model

Juan Gabriel Rueda-Bayona a,, José Horrillo-Caraballo b, Tatiana R Chaparro a
PMCID: PMC7334385  PMID: 32642515

Abstract

This data article presents set-up and input data files to model a surface river plume through curvilinear nested grid in double-way mode. The hydrodynamic modelling in river deltas with intense transport processes and complex bathymetry such as the Magdalena River delta, requires a mesh grid that ease the natural river discharge into the ocean. The aforementioned may be challenging due to the numerical scheme and stability restrictions of the numerical models that difficult having efficient and effective validated simulations. This dataset files are a reference to perform analysis of the hydrodynamic river deltas, meaningful for optimizing time and resources, easing the planning of measurement campaigns what reduce risks of the personnel and instrumentation during equipment deployment and field work .The application of the set-up and input data files of this data article is shown in Rueda-Bayona et al. [1].

Keywords: Numerical modelling, Hydrodynamic, Delft3D, Waves, Wind, Tides, Currents, Sediments


Specifications table

Subject Ocean engineering
Specific subject area Hydrodynamic and transport modelling of river delta.
Type of data Set-up files and input files.
How data were acquired Implementation and numerical simulation in a Windows Core i7 computer with x64 bits.
Data format Raw
Parameters for data collection The considered conditions for using the data files were the assesment of model performance (calibration-validation) through R2 correlations, p-value significance, time-series analysis and feasible model parameters reported in the literature.
Description of data collection The set-up files were configured, implemented and run considering numerical restrictions of the Delft3D model such as numercial stability, limitations of boundary conditions and feasible values of physical parameters (constants, roughness and viscosity). The set-up files are in American Standard Code for Information Interchange (ASCII) format with several file extensions according the model requirements.
Data source location The study area is the Magdalena River delta located in 11.106909° N and −74.850756° W.
Data accessibility Supplementary material alongside the online version of this data article.
Related research article Selection of JONSWAP Spectra Parameters During Water-depth and Sea-state Transitions, J. Waterw. Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. in press (2020) [1]

Value of the Data

  • The data (set-up and input files) allow to simulate currents, waves, salinity, temperature and sediments of a tropical river plume.

  • The data is useful to estimate surface hydrodynamics and transport for the most important river delta in Colombia (Magdalena River).

  • The utilized files can be used as reference to perform preliminary feasibility assessment of hydraulic engineering and environmental research projects.

1. Data description

The setup and input data files (Table 1) are stored in a folder named as River_Delta, which gathers the information of boundary conditions, numerical and physical parameters, transport processes, observation points and domain of the study area (Figs. 1 and 2) to be simulated through the Delf3d model.

Table 1.

Set-up and input data files of the numerical model.

Data file Model module File name
Master Definition Flow (MDF-file) Flow River_delta.mdf
Master Definition Wave (MDW-file) Wave River_delta.mdw
Hydrodynamic grid Flow River_delta.grd
Wave grid Wave outside_swan.grd
Bathymetry Flow and Wave River_Delta.dep
Boundary definition Flow River_Delta.bnd
Time-series flow conditions Flow River_Delta.bct
Transport conditions Flow River_Delta.bcc
Heat flux model data Flow River_Delta.tem
Wind data Flow River_Delta.wnd
Observation points Flow and Wave River_Delta.obs
Wave boundary condition Wave TPAR.bnd
Land boundary file (river and coast line) Flow and Wave River_Delta.ldb

Fig. 1.

Fig 1

Numerical meshes: (a) hydrodynamic grid for flow module, (b) three nested grids for wave module, (c) zoom in of the Magdalena River delta. Coordinates system in Bogotá Central Magna-Sirgas.

Fig. 2.

Fig 2

Grid cells, bathymetry and location of main features of the Magdalena River delta where label numbers indicate the isobaths. The magenta lines are model's thin dams that represent rigid structures such as dikes. Projected coordinates in Magna-Sirgas Bogota Zone (units in meters).

2. Experimental design, materials, and methods

The study area is located in the Magdalena River delta (Fig. 1c) which is considered strategic for protecting the coastal-marine ecosystems of the Salamanca's island natural park and the economy development of the Barranquilla city according to Alvarado [2] and the Colombian port and maritime administration DIMAR (Maritime General Direction (www.dimar.mil.co). Then, this data article may be considered as reference to simulate complex hydrodynamic process seen in river deltas with scarce available in-situ data because of the databases’ restrictions and instrument deployment.

This data article optimized the grids and model set-up [1,3,4] and defined a curvilinear mesh with 3 sigma layers for the flow module, with cell size about 30 m × 30 m at the river mouth, and cells with dimensions of 550 m × 210 m for the outer area (Fig. 1a). The wave model has three nested grids: the biggest is 1.8 km × 1.8 km, the intermediate is 600 m × 600 m (Fig. 1b), and the smallest is similar to the hydrodynamic grid cells nearby to the Magdalena River mouth (Fig. 2).

The bathymetry data (Fig. 2) was extracted from the ETOPO1 database [5] and combined with data of local nautical charts. The salinity and temperature data required by the model boundaries were acquired from the World Ocean Atlas 2013 data base (www.nodc.noaa.gov). The surface data (Total Suspended Sediments, Salinity, Temperature) for the river boundary belong to the water quality monitoring data system (REDCAM, in Spanish) data base (http://siam.invemar.org.co/redcam). Climate data such as solar radiation, winds, clouds, relative humidity and air temperature for the heat flux model was obtained from the NCEP North American Regional Reanalysis (NARR) data base [6]. The information of waves and tides for the ocean boundary was retrieved from the WAVEWATCH III model (https://polar.ncep.noaa.gov/waves/) and GRENOBLE model [7] respectively. River flow data of 2010 year was provided by the IDEHA institute (https://www.uninorte.edu.co/web/ideha/sobre-nosotros). The model calibration and validation is reported in Rueda-Bayona [1] which considered numerical modelling restrictions and recommendations reported for the study area [8], [9], [10].

The main files of the dataset of this article are organized and described as follows:

In order to improve the numerical results or reducing the computational time, this data article suggest the following values for the set-up files:

  • 1-

    Time step: 0.1 – 1 min.

  • 2-

    Numerical parameters (Depth at grid cell faces): Mean / Mor.

  • 3-

    Bottom roughness: constant or a rgh file with low Chezy values in boundary cells when instabilities or atypical current velocities appear.

  • 4-

    Number of layers: 3 layers with 5% of thickness for the surface layer.

Because the available wave data (WAVEWATCH III) for the open boundary is located several kilometers away from the river mouth, it was necessary the utilization of a big-coarse grid for the flow and wave modules (fig 333). As a result, after each run the Delft3d (version 4.01.00) reported in the command window a finished simulation with the message “*** ERROR Deltas > water depth in TRATUR”. Then, this article verified that prompt message according the recommendations of the website's forum [11] of Delft3d model. After several inspections and tuning to the model set-up the message kept because the bathymetry in the study area strongly varies naturally, what is a cause of the prompt message, however, the numerical results were inspected and may considered good because they kept similar to the numerical results aforementioned [1], [2], [3].

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Juan Gabriel Rueda-Bayona: Writing - original draft, Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis. José Horrillo-Caraballo: Writing - original draft. Tatiana R. Chaparro: Writing - original draft.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships which have, or could be perceived to have, influenced the work reported in this article.

Acknowledgments

Authors thank to Universidad Militar Nueva Granada and Universidad del Norte for the financial support through the research project INV-ING-2985 and to professor Humberto Ávila by the hydraulic recomendations and data provided by IDEHA.

Footnotes

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2020.105899.

Appendix. Supplementary materials

mmc1.xml (393B, xml)

References

  • 1.Rueda-Bayona J.G., Guzmán A., Cabello J.J. Selection of JONSWAP spectra parameters During Water-depth and Sea-state Transitions. J. Waterw. Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 2020 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000601. , in press. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.M. Alvarado, Río Magdalena. Navegación Marítima y fluvial (1986-2008), 2008.
  • 3.Rueda-Bayona J.G., Horrillo-Caraballo J. River delta hydrodynamic modeling with data limitations: study case. Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Coastal Engineering (ICCE 2020), Coastal Engineering Research Council of COPRI; Sydney; 2020. in press. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rueda-Bayona J.G. Universidad del Norte; 2017. Identificación de la influencia de las variaciones convectivas en la generación de cargas transitorias y su efecto hidromecánico en las estructuras Offshore. PhD Thesis. . http://manglar.uninorte.edu.co/handle/10584/7629?show=full. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.NOAA ETOPO1 Global Relief Model, ETOPO1 Glob. Reli. Model. 2018 https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/global/ [Google Scholar]
  • 6.NOAA, NCEP North American Regional Reanalysis: NARR, (2016). http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/gridded/data.narr.html(accessed January 5, 2016).
  • 7.Le Provost C., Genco M.L., Lyard F., Vincent P., Canceil P. Spectroscopy of the world ocean tides from a finite element hydrodynamic model. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 1994;99 doi: 10.1029/94JC01381. . 24777–24797 . [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Deltares, Delft3D-FLOW. Simulation of multi-dimensional hydrodynamic flows and transport phenomena, including sediments - User Manual, (2014).
  • 9.Restrepo J.C., Schrottke K., Traini C., Ortíz J.C., Orejarena A., Otero L., Higgins A., Marriaga L. Sediment Transport and Geomorphological Change in a High-Discharge Tropical Delta (Magdalena River, Colombia): insights from a Period of Intense Change and Human Intervention (1990–2010) J. Coast. Res. 2016 doi: 10.2112/jcoastres-D-14-00263.1. . [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ospino S., Restrepo J.C., Otero L., Pierini J., Alvarez-Silva O. Saltwater Intrusion into a River with High Fluvial Discharge: a Microtidal Estuary of the Magdalena River, Colombia. J. Coast. Res. 2018 doi: 10.2112/jcoastres-D-17-00144.1. . [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Deltares, Delft3d forum, (2015). https://oss.deltares.nl/web/delft3d/coast-/-estuary/-/message_boards/message/585990(accessed April 28, 2020).

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mmc1.xml (393B, xml)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES