Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Jul 6;15(7):e0235335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235335

Enhanced oxidative stress and damage in glycated erythrocytes

Chloé Turpin 1, Aurélie Catan 2, Alexis Guerin-Dubourg 2, Xavier Debussche 3,4, Susana B Bravo 5, Ezequiel Álvarez 5, Jean Van Den Elsen 6, Olivier Meilhac 1,7, Philippe Rondeau 1,*, Emmanuel Bourdon 1,*
Editor: Ping Song8
PMCID: PMC7337333  PMID: 32628695

Abstract

Diabetes is associated with a dramatic mortality rate due to its vascular complications. Chronic hyperglycemia in diabetes leads to enhanced glycation of erythrocytes and oxidative stress. Even though erythrocytes play a determining role in vascular complications, very little is known about how erythrocyte structure and functionality can be affected by glycation. Our objective was to decipher the impact of glycation on erythrocyte structure, oxidative stress parameters and capacity to interact with cultured human endothelial cells. In vitro glycated erythrocytes were prepared following incubation in the presence of different concentrations of glucose. To get insight into the in vivo relevance of our results, we compared these data to those obtained using red blood cells purified from diabetics or non-diabetics. We measured erythrocyte deformability, susceptibility to hemolysis, reactive oxygen species production and oxidative damage accumulation. Altered structures, redox status and oxidative modifications were increased in glycated erythrocytes. These modifications were associated with reduced antioxidant defence mediated by enzymatic activity. Enhanced erythrocyte phagocytosis by endothelial cells was observed when cultured with glycated erythrocytes, which was associated with increased levels of phosphatidylserine—likely as a result of an eryptosis phenomenon triggered by the hyperglycemic treatment. Most types of oxidative damage identified in in vitro glycated erythrocytes were also observed in red blood cells isolated from diabetics. These results bring new insights into the impact of glycation on erythrocyte structure, oxidative damage and their capacity to interact with endothelial cells, with a possible relevance to diabetes.

Introduction

Currently, more than 380 million people worldwide suffer from diabetes and this number is expected to double by 2035 [1]. Diabetes significantly enhances the risk of developing cardiovascular disease, which remains the leading cause of mortality in western countries [2]. Diabetes mellitus is responsible for the appearance of several microvascular and macrovascular complications such as coronary heart disease and ischemic strokes. Diabetic patients also exhibit a two- to three-fold increase in the risk of heart attacks and strokes [3]. Oxidative stress and oxidative modifications of proteins represent deleterious phenomena that have been implicated in the promotion of diabetic complications [2]. Oxidative stress was defined as an imbalance between oxidants such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antioxidants in favour of the oxidants, leading to a disturbance of redox signalling and molecular damage [4]. Chronic hyperglycemia in diabetes pathology leads to enhanced oxidative stress and damage to proteins such as glycation. This phenomenon is linked to the non-enzymatic attachment of a glucose molecule or derivatives to a free primary amine residue. Amadori rearrangement of the glycated protein gives rise to a heterogeneous class of deleterious compounds termed advanced glycation end-products (AGE) [5]. Glycation processes are enhanced in diabetics and affect mainly long half-life circulating proteins in particular hemoglobin [5]. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) analysis is a clinical test routinely used to determine blood glucose exposure over a long period (weeks/months) in diabetics. Circulating glycated proteins exhibit altered structure and function and may play a pivotal and causative role in diabetes-associated vascular complications [6,7,8].

Human erythrocytes represent the most abundant and one of the most specialized cells in the body and their unique structural feature is constituted by the absence of nuclei, mitochondria and ribosomes [9]. The main function of erythrocytes is to transport of oxygen (O2) through the human circulatory system [10]. Their role in oxygen transport and the presence of heme iron result in the formation of high levels of oxidizing radicals in erythrocytes [10]. To avoid oxidative stress, oxidizing radicals can be “detoxified” by antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione peroxidase, which are commonly found in erythrocytes [10]. When oxidative stress occurs, oxidised proteins may be degraded by the 20S proteasome system, which was only recently described in erythrocytes [11,12]. Erythrocytes play an active role in the development of chronic vascular diseases [13]. They constitute the main solid particles present in blood that can ‘squeeze’ through narrow vessels thanks to the high deformability of their membrane. Erythrocytes are therefore the main blood component in contact with endothelial cells. Very recently, a direct relationship has been established between the erythrocyte width and coronary artery disease rate [14]. During atherosclerosis, a common complication in diabetic patients, erythrocytes can reach the atherosclerotic plaque after healed ruptures and thrombus formation. Rupture of micro vessels causing intraplaque hemorrhages can also bring erythrocytes into the plaque [15]. Very recently, high erythrocyte mortality levels (eryptosis) associated with enhanced phagocytosis by smooth muscle cells were found to be a promoting factor of oxidative stress in early-stage atheroma in people [16].

Despite the well-established implications of oxidative damage in diabetes disorder development and the active role of erythrocytes in vascular complication, very little is known about the impact of glycation on the structure of erythrocytes, their redox status and capacity to be phagocytosed by endothelial cells. Here, we hypothesized that glycation impairs erythrocyte structure, redox status, hemolysis sensibility and enhances its phagocytosis by cultured human endothelial cells. In light of the results presented in this paper we believe that enhanced glycation-mediated modification of erythrocytes and endocytosis by endothelial cells could play an important role in the development of the diabetes-linked vascular complications.

Materials and methods

Erythrocyte preparations

Experiments involving human erythrocytes were approved by our institutional review board at Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (La Réunion, France). Samples were obtained from the Alb-Ox ERMIES an ancillary, pilot study of ERMIES (NCT01425866). All data were analyzed anonymously.

Blood from healthy volunteers with informed consent was collected in EDTA tubes (BD vacutainer®). After centrifugation, erythrocytes were washed 3 times with a sterile isotonic solution (NaCl 0.15 M, pH 7) and suspended to 20% hematocrit in sterile PBS. This solution was subsequently diluted with glucose stock solutions made in PBS to form incubation mixtures of erythrocytes with 0, 5, 25 and 137 mmol/l glucose (corresponding to 0, 0.9, 4.5 and 25 mg/mL glucose, respectively). After 5 days of incubation at 37°C, erythrocytes were washed 3 to 4 times with 0.15 M NaCl. For specific studies, erythrocytes from 12 type-2 diabetic individuals (HbA1c (%) = 11 ± 2.6) and from 9 non-diabetic individuals of the same age (HbA1c (%) = 4.4 ± 1) were obtained from the Alb-Ox ERMIES an ancillary, pilot study of ERMIES (NCT01425866). Erythrocytes were isolated as previously described and then suspended to 10% hematocrit in sterile PBS before incubation at 37°C for 5 days. Erythrocyte preparations were either directly analysed by FACS and ektacytometry, lysed with an equivalent volume of distilled water (enzymatic activities, redox status) or subjected to “ghost” preparation (membrane oxidative damage). In lysates, optical density was measured at 280 nm and protein concentration was calculated according to a standard curve of hemoglobin (50–500 μg) and expressed in μg per μL. In membrane preparation, protein concentrations were measured using Bradford assay.

HbA1c (%) level

Measurements were performed on our diluted erythrocyte preparations by using a high-pressure liquid chromatography method performed on an automated Hemoglobin analyser (D-10, Biorad) at the hospital of Saint Paul (La Réunion, France).

Mass spectroscopy for average molecular mass determination

Glycation of both α and β hemoglobin subunits was analysed by matrix-assisted desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) for mass shift determination as previously described [17]. Mass spectra were obtained in three independent experiments. On each spectrum, the four main peaks for α and β haemoglobin subunits and their glycated forms were identified. For each peak, the mass (m/z) and Δmass between non-glycated and glycated subunits were obtained. Relative intensity of each peak was calculated as follow: % glycation = (intensity glycated-hemoglobin / intensity hemoglobin) x 100.

5-hydroxymethylfurfural level

The thiobarbituric acid (TBA) assay was used for 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF) quantification in our different preparations according to the protocol detailed in Murtiashaw et al. [18]. Briefly, 1 ml of diluted erythrocytes was hydrolysed at 100°C for 1 h after addition of 0.5 ml of 0.3 N oxalic acid. After cooling to RT, 0.5 ml of 40% trichloroacetic acid was added and thoroughly mixed before centrifugation for 15 min at 3000 g. Then, 0.5 ml of 0.05 M TBA was added to 0.4 ml of supernatant and the mixture was incubated at 40°C for 30 min. The absorbance was read at 443 nm. The 5-HMF concentration was determined by using its molar extinction coefficient (4.108) and expressed as mmol of 5-HMF per milligram of protein.

Early glycation product determination

Fluorescein boronic acids (Flu-BA) were used to detect early glycation products (EGP) in our erythrocyte preparations. Flu-BA was prepared following the protocols detailed in Pereira Morais et al. [19]. Boronic acids specifically interact with fructosamine-modified proteins via interaction with the cis-1,2-diol containing adducts [19]. This probe was recently used to quantify carbohydrate modifications in tissue extracts [20,21].

Prior to flow cytometry analysis, erythrocyte preparations (approximately 106 cells) were incubated with 25 μM of Flu-BA or fluorescein in binding buffer (BioLegend) for 30 min at RT. After incubation, cells were pelleted by centrifugation (1000 rpm, 5 min) and supernatant was discarded, and labelled cells were resuspended in PBS. Fluorescence was measured by FACS (Beckman Coulter's CytoFLEX and Cytexpert software) with an excitation and emission wavelengths of 488 nm and 530 nm, respectively. The level of early glycation products were determined after mean fluorescence normalization of erythrocytes probed with fluorescein only and expressed as a percentage relative to the control (non glycated erythrocytes G0).

Free radical-induced hemolysis test

The capacity of erythrocyte preparations to resist lysis induced by an oxidative stress was investigated by using the in vitro free radical-induced blood hemolysis assay. Hemolysis was induced using a water-soluble free radical generator, 2,2’-azo-bis 2-aminodinopropane (AAPH, Sigma). 135 μL of diluted erythrocyte preparations (approximately 108 erythrocytes) were added to each well of a 96-well plate. Hemolysis was started by adding 40μL of 0.5 M AAPH to each well and the turbidimetry at 450 nm was recorded every 10 minutes using a temperature controlled microplate reader at 37°C (Fluostar, BMG Labtech). For each condition, the time to 50% of maximal hemolysis (HT50) was determined in triplicate. In other work, the measurement of HT50 was shown to be very reproducible: 1.32% and 3.85% intra- and inter-assay coefficients, respectively [22].

Enzymatic activities

SOD activity was measured by monitoring the rate of acetylated cytochrome c reduction by superoxide radicals generated by the xanthine/xanthine oxidase system as published in [23]. Measurements were performed using the reagent buffer (xanthine oxidase, xanthine (0.5 mM), cytochrome c (0.2 mM), KH2PO4 (50 mM), EDTA (2 mM), pH 7.8) at 25°C. The kinetics of cytochrome c reduction were monitored by spectrophotometry at 560 nm. SOD activities calibrated relative to a standard curve of SOD up to 6 unit/mg.

The catalase activity assay was carried on 40 μg of protein lysate in 25 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), as recently described [23]. Blanks were measured at 240 nm just before adding 80 μL of H2O2 (10 mM final) to start the reaction. The kinetics of H2O2 reduction were monitored by measuring the absorbance every 5 s at 240 nm for 1 min and catalase activity was calibrated relative to a standard curve of increasing amount of catalase between 12.5 and 125 units/ml. Catalase activity was expressed as international catalytic units per mg of protein.

Chymotrypsin-like activity of the proteasome was assayed using the fluorogenic peptide (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis): Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-7-amido-4-methylcoumarin (LLVYMCA at 25 mM), as described previously [24].

Peroxidase activities of cell lysates were assessed according to the method of Everse et al [25]. A reaction mixture was prepared with 50 mM citrate buffer, 0.2% o-dianisidine and samples diluted 1/100. The reaction was initiated by adding 20 mM H2O2. Peroxidase activity was determined by measuring the absorbance at 450 nm at 25°C for 3 min. Peroxidase activity was expressed as international catalytic units per mg of protein.

Dot-blots

Four microliters of erythrocyte lysate (approximately 20 μg of proteins) were spotted onto a dry nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was air-dried for 5 minutes and total protein was stained using Ponceau red dye. The membrane was initially blocked with PBS/Tween 20 0.1% (v/v)/ milk 5% for 3 hours at room temperature and then sequentially probed for another 3 hours with a primary antibody directed against 4-HNE (1:1000; ab46545; Abcam, Cambridge MA) or rabbit anti AGE antibody (Abcam, Ab23722). This was followed by secondary antibody incubation for at least 1 hour (1:2000; Peroxidase AffiniPure Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L); Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories Inc; 111-035-003). Between each step, membranes were washed three times with PBS/Tween 20 0.1% (v/v). Detection was performed using the enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (ECL®, GE Healthcare). Signal intensities were quantified using the freeware ImageJ (version 1.32j) available from the internet website: http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/.

Endothelial cell culture and stimulation

The human endothelial EA.hy926 cell line was obtained from the American tissue culture collection (CRL-2922) and was cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS), penicillin (100 units/ml), streptomycin (100 μg/ml), L-glutamine (2 mM) and HAT (hypoxanthine 100 μmol/L; aminopterin 0.4 μmol/L and thymidine 16 μmol/L). Cells were grown in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere. Approximately 100 000 cells were plated in 24 cell plates. When cells reached confluency, they were treated in the absence (control PBS) or presence of 71 μl/cm² of the different erythrocytes preparations for 24 h. Internalized erythrocytes were detected using the 2,7-diaminofluorene (DAF) reagent which quantifies the pseudo-peroxidase activity of RBC hemoglobin. After 24-hours of incubation with erythrocytes, endothelial cells were washed 3 times with PBS and treated with water for 3 minutes to induce lysis (by hypotonic shock) of any fixed erythrocytes at the cellular membrane surface and supernatant was discarded.

Endothelial cells were then lysed with PBS/Triton X100 for 3 minutes to release the cytosolic fraction containing internalized erythrocytes and their hemoglobin. DAF solution was prepared extemporaneously by dissolving 10 mg of DAF reagent in 10 ml of tris HCl 0.2 N with 9% acetic acid supplemented with 20 μl of 30% hydrogen peroxide just before use. 100 μl of DAF solution was added to 40 μl of cytosolic samples previously transferred to a 96-well plate. Optical density (OD) was measured at 620 nm. Internalized erythrocytes were quantified relative to calibration erythrocyte standards (27–5760 cells/μl) and results were expressed as erythrocyte number.

Flow cytometry assays

Erythrocyte shape, eryptosis evaluation and intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in our different erythrocyte preparations were measured by flow cytometry using Beckman Coulter's CytoFLEX and Cytexpert software. A specific erythrocyte cell population was selected by gating and could be characterized by its typical location in a forward scatter (FSC) versus a side scatter (SSC) parameter graph. For phosphatidylserine exposure determination, erythrocytes were incubated with 2 μg/ml Annexin V-FITC in binding buffer (BioLegend) for 30 min at RT before flow cytometry analysis. Annexin V protein exhibits a high affinity for phosphatidylserine (PS) and was measured with an excitation wavelength of 488 nm and an emission wavelength of 530 nm. For evaluation of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, erythrocytes were incubated with 2 μM of the fluorescent probe dihydroethidium (DHE; Sigma-Aldrich, D7008) or dichlorodihydrofluoresceindiacetate (DCFH-DA; Sigma-Aldrich, D6883) for 30 min at RT.

Ektacytometry

The determination of erythrocytes membrane deformability was performed using an ektacytometer (LORCCA MaxSis, Mechatronics, The Netherlands) which measures the elongation of red blood cells at increasing shear stress. Red blood cells suspended at 10% hematocrit were diluted 200 times in an iso-osmolar solution of polyvinylpyrrolidone buffer (PVP, viscosity 28.6 mPa/s). Deformation was expressed as an elongation index (EI) was calculated for 19 shear-stresses between 0.30 and 80 Pa (increasing rotation speed) as follows: EI = (A-B) / (A+B), where A and B represent the length and the width of the ellipsoid diffraction pattern, respectively. The deformability curve was obtained by plotting the calculated values for EI versus the shear stress [26].

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) or as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) from at least three independent experiments performed in triplicate. Statistical analyses were performed with Prism (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Statistical significance was determined using the Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test, with a p-value < 0.05 required for significance.

Results

Impact of in vitro glycation on erythrocyte morphology and redox status

Experiments were designed to determine whether short-term incubation of erythrocytes with increasing concentrations of glucose may affect their morphology and redox status.

To characterize the glycation level of our erythrocyte preparations, the percentage of HbA1c and the 5-HMF concentration were measured in the lysates of our different preparations (Table 1). A significant increase in HbA1c percentage was observed in erythrocytes incubated with 137 mM of glucose (p<0.05) compared to erythrocytes incubated in the absence of glucose (G0). Interestingly, the value obtained for G137 erythrocytes (7%) is highly similar to HbA1c values observed in diabetic patients. Indeed, 6.5% in HbA1c corresponds to the threshold used to diagnose persons with diabetes [27]. Similar results were observed with the 5-HMF concentrations in the different glycated erythrocyte preparations (Table 1). This intermediate formed from carbohydrates such as glucose is a good indicator of protein glycation [28].

Table 1. In vitro incubation with high glucose concentration significantly enhances erythrocyte glycation.

The impact of erythrocyte incubation in the presence of enhanced glucose concentration on the percentage of glycated hemoglobin (% HbA1c), the 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and the early glycation product (EGP) levels were determined as described in material and method section. GX corresponds to erythrocytes incubated with X mM glucose and G0 corresponds to erythrocytes incubated in the absence of glucose. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6 to 8 independent replicates) and statistical analyses were performed using One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. *p<0.05, **p<0.01 in comparison with G0.

G0 G5 G25 G137
HbA1c (%) 5.22 ± 0.4 5.18 ± 0.4 4.9 ± 0.47 7.06 ± 1.65*
5-HMF (% G0) 100 ± 14.4 97.2 ± 10.1 102 ± 14.8 155 ± 31.5**
EGP (% G0) 100 ± 19.3 129.8 ± 14.4 135.3 ± 20.4 457 ± 63.2**

Early glycation product (EGP) accumulation in erythrocyte preparations was evaluated using a specific fluorescent probe (Flu-BA) developed by our group [19].

EGP levels determined after fluorescence normalization of erythrocytes probed with fluorescein only are reported in Table 1. A significant increase in EGP accumulation was observed in erythrocytes incubated with 137 mM of glucose (p<0.01) compared to erythrocytes incubated at G0.

Flow cytometry of fluorescein boronic acid-labelled erythrocytes detected a distinct subpopulation of cells that appeared after treatment with high concentrations of glucose (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Early glycation product detection by using fluorescent boronic acids.

Fig 1

Cytometry analysis of our erythrocyte preparations was performed as described in material and method section. Following probing with fluorescent boronic acids, erythrocyte populations were gated according to cell location in a side scatter (SSC) parameter vs. FITC fluorescence. Black arrow evidences the specific population of glycated positive erythrocytes that become predominant when they were incubated with increasing concentrations of glucose.

To further characterize the glycation level in our erythrocyte preparations, the proportion of glycated forms of both α and β hemoglobin was determined by mass spectrometry. Representative figures of the mass spectra obtained for α- and β -hemoglobin subunits and their glycated forms are presented in the supplementary materials (cf S1 Fig). The relative intensity of m/z peaks corresponding to glycated and non-glycated forms for both subunits, and the corresponding percentage of glycation are presented in Table 2. Our results show erythrocytes incubated with 137 mM of glucose are significantly more glycated in both hemoglobin subunits (α and β) than G0 erythrocytes. It is worth noting that for all erythrocyte preparations, the glycated forms of the Hb subunits display a ~200 Da increase in mass. The increase in glycation was also confirmed by significant increases in AGE content in dot blots (Fig 2A and 2B) and western blots (Fig 2C and 2D).

Table 2. Characterisation of glycation percentage in the different erythrocyte preparations by mass spectrometry.

Data for the four main peak of the mass spectra corresponding to α-hemoglobin (α-Hb; 15130 Da), glycated α-hemoglobin (g-α-Hb; 15330 Da), β-hemoglobin (β-Hb; 15890 Da), glycated β-hemoglobin (g-β-Hb; 16100 Da) (S1 Fig—see supplemental data). G0, G5, G25 and G137 represent the four conditions of incubation to which erythrocytes were subjected: 0, 5, 25 and 137 mmol/l glucose, respectively. Δmass and % glycation were calculated as explained in the methods section. Results are the mean ± SD and statistical analyses were performed using Tukey’s post hoc analysis following a significant one way ANOVA: ***p<0.001, **p<0.01, *p<0.05 (vs. G0), ###p<0.001, #p<0.05 (vs. G5).

α-hemoglobin
α-Hb glycated-α-Hb
mass/z Intensity mass/z Intensity Δ mass % glycation
G0 15132.2 ± 3.2 98.9 ± 2.9 15334.1 ± 3.4 46.7 ± 3.8 201.8 ± 1.2 48.4 ± 1.2
G5 15132.4 ± 3.8 100.0 ± 0.1 15334.8 ± 2.9 48.7 ± 2.9 202.4 ± 1.2 48.6 ± 0.7
G25 15134.9 ± 2.6 98.3 ± 5.1 15335.5 ± 2.5 50.3 ± 4.0 200.6 ± 0.9 51.2 ± 0.7
G137 15139.2 ± 3.2 95.2 ± 7.9 15334.0 ± 3.8 54.9 ± 6.4 194.8 ± 1.9 57.8 ± 1.3**#
β-hemoglobin
β-Hb glycated-β-Hb
mass/z Intensity mass/z Intensity Δ mass % glycation
G0 15891.5 ± 3.7 77.5 ± 16.4 16093.1 ± 11.9 50.2 ± 8.2 201.8 ± 11.5 66.6 ± 1.9
G5 15892.5 ± 4.2 78.6 ± 10.8 16091.7 ± 7.4 52.6 ± 8.4 201.8 ± 11.5 67.0 ± 1.3
G25 15894.5 ± 3.6 78.3 ± 15.4 16089.0 ± 3.7 54.5 ± 7.8 194.5 ± 4.2 70.0 ± 1.4*
G137 15897.2 ± 3.6 89.9 ± 12.1 16088.5 ± 3.9 67.1 ± 11 191.3 ± 3.8 74.3 ± 1.2***####

Fig 2. Glycated erythrocytes exhibit an impaired deformability capacity.

Fig 2

In this figure, G0, G5, G25 and G137 represent the four conditions of incubation to which erythrocytes were subjected: 0, 5, 25 and 137 mmol/l glucose, respectively. (A) Representative AGE dot blot performed on lysate preparations (n = 4); (B) Quantification of AGE signal normalized with Ponceau S signal in the different erythrocyte preparations. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM of 3 to 4 experiments performed independently. #p<0.05 vs. G5 (Student’s t test, n = 3 to 4); (C) Representative AGE western blot performed on lysate preparations (n = 4); (D) Quantification of AGE signal normalized with ponceau red signal in the different erythrocyte preparations. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM of 4 experiments performed independently. *p<0.05, **p<0.01 vs. G0 (Student’s t test, n = 4). (E) HT50 was measured by the free-radical hemolysis test as described in method section. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM of 5 to 8 experiments performed independently. *p<0.05, **p< 0.01 indicates a significant difference vs. G0 (One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test) n = 5 independent analyses; (F) Curves correspond to the elongation index of erythrocytes determined by LORRCA measurement as a function of shear stress intensity (Pa); (G) Histograms correspond to the calculated variation in elongation index (delta EI) reflecting capacity of erythrocytes to deform when submitted to a shear stress ranking from 0 to 80 Pa. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. *p<0.05 indicates a significant difference as compared to G0 (One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test) n = 3 independent replicates.

The capacity of erythrocytes to resist oxidative stress was examined using in vitro free radical-induced blood hemolysis. Results were expressed as the half time of hemolysis (HT50) following our erythrocyte preparations “attack” with a free radical generator (AAPH). Erythrocytes incubated with 5 or 25 mM of glucose (G5, G25) exhibited a significantly higher HT50 compared to G0 (Fig 2E). This was suggestive of a protective membrane-stabilising effect of low concentrations of glucose which, interestingly, was no longer observed when incubated at 137 mM glucose (Fig 2E).

Due to their biconcave shape, erythrocytes are able to deform and pass through small vessels like capillaries [9]. The deformability of the different erythrocyte preparations was analysed using the ektacytometry method and results are displayed in Fig 2F and 2G. Changes in the elongation index revealed a loss of cellular deformability in response to increasing shear stress when erythrocytes were incubated with increasing concentrations of glucose. A significant decrease of deformability was observed in glycated erythrocytes compared to erythrocytes incubated in the absence (G0) or presence of low concentration of glucose (G5). These data clearly indicate that the glycation phenomenon induced by the hyperglycemic incubations renders erythrocytes less deformable (about four times less) and more rigid than erythrocytes incubated under low glycemic conditions. It is worth noting that impaired deformability of glycated erythrocytes was also observed under low shear stress conditions (3 Pa), which are similar to those that can be encountered under standard physiological conditions [29].

Erythrocyte morphology and deformability were subsequently investigated in order to get further insights into erythrocyte fragility. Flow cytometry was used to determine the relative size of our different erythrocyte preparations. By using the FSC and SSC parameters, each preparation containing a mix of erythrocytes was analysed and specific populations were gated according to cell size and granularity. We observed the formation of an additional erythrocyte population (highlighted by an arrow in Fig 3A), which became dominant when incubated at higher concentrations of glucose. This potentially represents a population of erythrocytes engaged in an accelerated aging process induced by the hyperglycemic treatment [30].

Fig 3. Glycation alters erythrocyte morphology.

Fig 3

Cytometry analysis of our erythrocytes preparation was performed as described in material and method section. GX corresponds to erythrocytes incubated with X mM glucose and G0 corresponds to erythrocytes incubated in the absence of glucose. (A) Erythrocyte populations were gated according to cell location in a forward scatter (FSC) versus a side scatter (SSC) parameter. Black arrow evidences the specific population of glycated altered erythrocytes that become predominant when they were incubated with increasing concentrations of glucose. (B) SSC parameters of our erythrocytes preparation were performed as described in material and method section **p<0,01 indicates a significant difference vs. G0 (Student’s t test).

Hyperglycemic conditions are known to be associated with increased ROS production (5). Therefore, we evaluated the impact of in vitro glycation on erythrocyte redox status. The impact of in vitro glycation on erythrocyte redox balance was first determined by the analysis of intracellular ROS formation using a specific fluorescent probe in cell lysate. The dihydroethidium molecule (DHE) can penetrate erythrocytes and emit fluorescence when oxidised by free radicals. Increase in DHE fluorescence in erythrocytes was observed when incubated with increasing concentrations of glucose (Fig 4A). This enhanced intracellular free radical formation reached our significance threshold in erythrocytes glycated with 137 mM of glucose (p<0.01, vs. G0). The levels of the oxidative damage-indicating biomarker 4-HNE were significantly higher in erythrocytes that were glycated with 25 or 137 mM of glucose compared to those exposed to 5 mM of glucose (Fig 4B and 4C).

Fig 4. Enhanced oxidative stress and damages in glycated erythrocytes.

Fig 4

In this figure, G0, G5, G25 and G137 represent the four conditions of incubation to which erythrocytes were subjected: 0, 5, 25 and 137 mmol/l glucose, respectively. (A) Intracellular ROS formation levels in erythrocyte preparation was determined using DHE probe by cytometry. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 4), **p<0.01 indicates a significant difference vs. G0 (one way ANOVA followed by Dunnet’s test). (B) 4-HNE dot blot image is representative of four dot blot experiments. (C) 4-HNE signal quantification was expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 4), *p<0.05 (vs. G0), #p<0.05, ##p<0.01 (vs. G5) using Student’s t test. (D) Phosphatidyl serine (PS) exposure in erythrocytes preparations was evaluated by cytometry as described in method section. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM, *p< 0.05, ***p< 0.001 vs. G0 (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test, n = 4). (E) Internalized red blood cell in cultured EA.hy926 cell lines was determined by DAF assay and are expressed in arbitrary unit as mean ± SEM (n = 3), *p < 0.05, **p< 0.01 (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test).

In order to gain further insight into the redox status of our erythrocyte preparations and the origin of enhanced ROS formation and oxidative damage in glycated erythrocytes, antioxidant enzyme and proteasome activities were measured (Table 3). Whilst SOD and catalase activities appeared not to be significantly different in our erythrocyte preparations, a significantly reduced peroxidase activity was measured in erythrocytes that were incubated with 137 mM of glucose (-33%, p<0.05 vs. G25). This reduced peroxidase activity could explain the enhanced ROS formation in G137 erythrocytes. Similarly, a significant reduction of the chymotrypsin-like activity of the proteasome was measured in G137 erythrocytes (-74%, p<0.05 vs. G5).

Table 3. Effect of glycation on erythrocyte enzymatic activites involved in redox balance and in oxidised protein degradation.

Catalase, superoxide dismutase, peroxidase and chymotrypsine-like activity of the proteasome (LLVY). Enzymatic activities were determined as described in the material and methods section. G0, G5, G25 and G137 represent the four conditions of incubation to which erythrocytes were subjected: 0, 5, 25 and 137 mmol/l glucose, respectively. Results are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 4 to 9) and statistical analyses were performed using Tukey’s post hoc analysis following a significant one way ANOVA: * effect of erythrocyte glycation (vs. G 5): * p<0.05. #p<0.05 (vs. G25).

G0 G5 G25 G137
SOD AU/mg prot 100 ± 28 109 ± 42 121 ± 40 140 ± 73
Catalase AU/mg prot 100 ± 27 105 ± 30 146 ± 53 131 ± 82
Peroxidase AU/μg prot 100 ± 20 88 ± 31 106 ± 49 71 ± 26#
LLVY AU/μg prot 100 ± 10 129 ± 73 110 ± 63 33 ± 37*

Enhanced intracellular oxidative stress could be a determining signal for glycated erythrocytes to initiate eryptosis, the programmed cell death for anuclear erythrocytes. To confirm this hypothesis, we investigated whether glycated erythrocyte preparations exhibit phosphatidylserine exposure, which is a measure of eryptosis [31]. Incubations with 25 mM and 137 mM of glucose lead to a significantly higher phosphatidylserine exposure, in a dose-dependent manner, when compared to erythrocytes incubated in the absence of glucose (Fig 4D). These results clearly indicate that eryptosis is enhanced in glycated erythrocytes. Phosphatidylserine exposure associated with membrane rigidity appears to be critical factors of red blood cell clearance. Effects of glycated erythrocytes were further investigated by analysing their capacity of being phagocytosed by the human endothelial EA.hy926 cell line.

Fig 4E shows that glycation of erythrocytes with high glucose concentration (25 mM and 137 mM) induced their phagocytosis by endothelial cells, as illustrated by high levels of internalized red blood cells. These results can be related to the enhanced eryptosis of red blood cells when glycated. Endothelial cells viability did not seem to be affected by the enhanced phagocytosis of glycated erythrocytes.

In vivo modifications of erythrocytes in diabetic vs non-diabetic individuals

We compared results from our in vitro model of glycation, to those of erythrocytes isolated from diabetic or non-diabetic individuals in terms of both morphology and redox status.

Erythrocytes from diabetic patients were significantly less deformable than erythrocytes from non-diabetics (Fig 5A and 5B). Indeed, the variation of elongation index in response to an increasing shear stress appears to be lower for erythrocytes isolated from diabetic persons compared to non-diabetics. A significant higher SSC was measured for erythrocytes when purified from diabetics (+38% ± 23.4, p<0.05 vs. ND), whereas the FSC value was not impacted (Figs 5C and S2). This result is in favour of an altered erythrocyte structure and shape when isolated from diabetics. With respect to the redox status (Fig 5D), a significant increase in intracellular ROS formation, probed by DHE, was evidenced in erythrocytes that were purified from diabetics (+39%, p<0.05 vs. ND). Similar and significant result was also evidenced by using DCFDA probe (Fig 5E).

Fig 5. Erythrocytes from diabetics exhibit altered morphology and enhanced oxidative stress.

Fig 5

(A) Curves correspond to the elongation index of erythrocytes determined by LORRCA measurement as a function of the shear stress intensity (in Pascal unit). (B) Delta elongation index, results are mean ± SEM (n = 9 ND and 12 D), *p<0.05 (Student’s t test). (C) Geo mean Side Scatter (SSC) value of erythrocytes analysed by flow cytometry, *p<0.05 (Student’s t test). (D) Intracellular ROS formation level in erythrocyte evaluated using DHE probe by cytometry, *p<0.05 (Student’s t test). (E) Intracellular ROS formation in erythrocyte preparation was evaluated using DCFDA probe by cytometry. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM, *p<0.05 (Student’s t test). (FE) Phosphatidylserine exposure in erythrocytes preparations was quantified by cytometry as described in method section. (G) Representative AGE dot blot performed on lysate preparations of erythrocytes isolated from diabetic and non-diabetic individuals. (HF) AGE quantification by dot blot, n = 9 ND and 12 D, *p<0.05 (Student’s t test).

Three oxidative parameters were determined in erythrocytes from diabetic and non-diabetic persons. No variation in 4-HNE levels was observed, while a significant increase in AGE formation was seen in erythrocytes from diabetics (Fig 5F and 5G). In addition, accumulation of advanced oxidation product (AOPP), was found to be higher (+18%) in erythrocytes from diabetics but this increase did not reach significance.

Although catalase and SOD activities appeared not to be significantly different between both groups (ND vs. D), a significant reduced peroxidase activity was measured in erythrocytes isolated from diabetic persons (Table 4). This reduction in peroxidase activity, associated with high glucose concentration, could explain the enhanced ROS formation in erythrocytes isolated from diabetic persons. Conversely, the chymotrypsin-like activity of the proteasome appeared to be significantly enhanced in erythrocytes purified from diabetics compared to those from non-diabetics (Table 4).

Table 4. Intracellular enzymatic activities of erythrocytes isolated from non-diabetic and diabetic.

Catalase, superoxide dismutase, peroxidase and proteasome enzymatic activities were determined as described in the section of material and methods. Results are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 9 ND and 12 D), *P <0.05 vs. ND (Student’s t-test).

ND D
SOD AU/mg prot 100 ± 25 84 ± 31
Catalase AU/mg prot 100 ± 28 100 ± 33
Peroxidase AU/μg prot 100 ± 14 90 ± 11*
LLVY AU/μg prot 100 ± 72 161 ± 36*

Proteasome activity may be activated under moderate oxidative stress [32]. In vivo, if oxidative stress is higher in erythrocytes from diabetics than from non-diabetics, no variation was measured in term of 4-HNE accumulation. Enhanced oxidative stress in in vivo glycated erythrocytes may be significant and moderate enough to trigger proteasome LLVY activation.

Finally, eryptosis in erythrocytes from diabetics or non-diabetics was investigated (Fig 5H). Erythrocytes from diabetic persons exhibit a tendency for a higher phosphatidylserine exposure than erythrocytes isolated from non-diabetic persons. This is in favour of a triggered eryptosis phenomenon in erythrocytes when in vivo glycated.

Discussion

Despite the fact that erythrocytes represent a key player in vascular complications, very little is known about how structure, redox status and capacity of erythrocytes to be phagocytosed by endothelial cells can be affected by glycation. In this study we revealed that in vitro glycation renders erythrocytes less deformable and leads to the alteration of their structure. We demonstrated that glycated erythrocytes produce more intracellular ROS and exhibit an altered redox balance. Furthermore, we highlight a potentially higher phosphatidylserine exposure of erythrocytes when glycated. All these characteristics observed in in vitro glycated erythrocytes were confirmed to occur in vivo when analysing erythrocytes isolated from diabetic patients.

To obtain an in vitro model of glycation, erythrocytes were incubated during 5 days in the absence or presence of increasing glucose concentrations up. HbA1c levels were first evaluated in our different fractions and pathological percentages were obtained for G137 erythrocytes (7%). Hence, our in vitro conditions represent an suitable glycation model inducing HbA1c percentages similar to those that can be measured in diabetic patients. Indeed, a HbA1c content of 6.5% corresponds to the threshold that is currently used to diagnose person with diabetes [27]. A more detailed characterization of our preparations at a molecular level, using mass spectrometry, revealed that erythrocytes incubated with 25 or 137 mM of glucose are significantly more glycated in both hemoglobin subunits (α and β) than erythrocytes incubated in the absence of glucose.

Analysis of erythrocyte morphology revealed a higher fragility (facilitated hemolysis), reduced size, and impaired deformability when glycated at 137mM of glucose. Glycated erythrocyte lysis, may constitute a source of oxidative stress through the high iron content in hemoglobin that could be released in the arterial wall vicinity [13]. Our cytometry results show altered erythrocyte size following in vitro glycation which is identical to observations made in aged and senescent erythrocytes. Erythrocyte size is a common biomarker used in clinical analysis and is reported as red blood cell width (RDW) [14]. Very recently, a positive association was found between RDW and the severity of coronary artery disease [14]. Ektacytometry is an adequate methodology to assess erythrocyte deformability [26]. Our data indicate that glycation phenomena induced by the hyperglycemic incubations render erythrocytes significantly less deformable and therefore more rigid than erythrocytes incubated under low glycemic conditions. Whilst ektacytometry is a well defined technique for the diagnosis of specific pathology, its use in research is less developed [26]. However, a recent research article published by the group of Pretorius showed a close link between erythrocyte deformability, hemorheology and cardiovascular dysfunction parameters [31]. The impaired capacity of erythrocytes to deform when glycated may have significant implications in the progression of vascular complications in diabetes. Indeed, in vivo glycated erythrocytes may exhibit an altered capacity to pass through tiny vessels like those present in intraplaque neovascularization, contributing to plaque progression and instability [15].

Oxidative stress and damage caused by ROS are implicated in the development of pathologies and in diabetes complications [4,33]. In this study, enhanced ROS formation was observed in glycated erythrocytes, associated with a reduced peroxidase activity. Free radicals and oxidants such as O2°-, HO° and H2O2, may arise from the high oxygen pressure and from the iron present in hemoglobin [13]. In addition, the generation of reactive oxygen species observed in our glycated erythrocyte model could also result from glucose auto-oxidation [28]. Under our experimental conditions, decreased peroxidase activity lead to reduced H2O2 “detoxification” by catalysis to H2O. Hydrogen peroxide can generate the highly reactive hydroxyl radical HO° through Fenton reaction involving iron [7]. Similar results in term of oxidative stress has been observed in erythrocytes when isolated from insulin resistant obese children [34].

Oxidative stress can lead to the formation of oxidised compounds that may affect protein structure and function [35]. A significant accumulation of the oxidative biomarker 4-HNE was detected in erythrocytes glycated with 25 and 137 mM glucose (Fig 4B and 4C) and associated with a significant reduction in the chymotrypsin-like activity of the proteasome (Table 3). If proteasome activity may be activated under moderate oxidative stress, in higher oxidant conditions a decrease in proteolytic activity may occur [32]. Friguet et al., identified the 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) as a specific oxidant that can inhibit proteasome activity though its binding to the enzymatic protein complex [32]. Under our experimental conditions, the observed significant impairment in proteasome activity in glycated erythrocytes might result from the enhanced ROS formation and 4-HNE content present in our glycated erythrocyte preparations. This reduced proteasome activity may contribute to the altered redox status in G137 erythrocytes leading to increased oxidised protein accumulation. In addition, oxidised proteins that are not degraded by the impaired proteasome system may also contribute to the enhanced ROS generation in G137 erythrocytes. Enhanced 4-HNE accumulation in glycated erythrocytes may induce adduct formation in proteasome subunit leading to proteolytic activity inhibition [36]. If the proteasome plays an important role in controlling redox homeostasis and in degradation oxidised proteins [32], its activities in erythrocytes remain poorly studied. It is worth noting that in a recent study, using a proteomic analysis performed on blood, the 20 S proteasome was identified as a target for glycation in erythrocytes isolated from diabetic patients [37].

Phagocytosis experiments revealed significantly increased phagocytosis of in vitro glycated erythrocytes by endothelial cells. This phagocytosis was associated with a higher phosphatidylserine exposure at the surface of glycated erythrocytes attesting their enhanced eryptosis. Abnormal adherence and phagocytosis of erythrocytes by endothelial cells has been described in vascular complications such as atherosclerosis and abdominal aortic aneurysm [13,16].

Most of the types of erythrocyte damage observed with in vitro glycated erythrocytes were also observed in erythrocytes isolated from diabetic patients. Indeed, an altered structure associated with enhanced ROS production and modified redox balance was observed in erythrocytes isolated from diabetic patients in comparison to those isolated from non-diabetics. Interestingly, an enhanced carbonylation of erythrocyte membranes were observed in cell isolated from diabetic patients and correlated with the clinical severity of the pathology [38]. Finally, the triggered eryptosis phenomenon observed in erythrocytes isolated from diabetics could lead to increased phagocytosis by endothelial cells in vivo.

Whilst more studies are needed to decipher the role of glycation on erythrocyte capacity in vascular dysfunctions linked to diabetes, the study presented here reveals several novel insights with respect to the impact of glycation on erythrocyte structure, morphology, and capacity to be phagocytosed by endothelial with a possible relevance to diabetes.

Supporting information

S1 File

(DOCX)

S1 Fig. Characterisation of glycation percentage in the different erythrocyte preparations by mass spectrometry.

Representative figures of the mass spectra obtained in three independent experiments for each incubation condition: 0 (G0), 5 (G5), 25 (G25) and 137 (G137) mmol/l glucose. On each spectrum, four main peaks were obtained corresponding to α-hemoglobin (αHb; 15130 Da), glycated α-hemoglobin (gαHb; 15330 Da), β-hemoglobin (βHb; 15890 Da), glycated β-hemoglobin (gβHb; 16100 Da).

(DOCX)

S2 Fig. Diabetes alters erythrocyte morphology.

Typical Forward Scatter (FSC) and Side Scatter (SSC) characteristics represented in dot-blot graph obtained by cytometry erythrocytes from non diabetic (left) and diabetic persons (right).

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

A special thank you goes to Dr David Wilkinson for helpful discussions and editing this manuscript. Kind helps from Dr. Catherine CETRE-SOSSAH was greatly appreciated by the Authors.

Abbreviations

AGEs

advanced glycation (or glycoxidation) end products

ANOVA

analysis of variance

AU

arbitrary unit

DCFH-DA

dichlorofluorescein diacetate

ECL

enhanced luminol chemiluminescence

FACS

fluorescence-activated cell sorting

Flu-BA

Fluorescein boronic acids

GX

erythrocytes incubated with × mM glucose

G0

incubated in the absence of glucose

4-HNE

4-hydroxynonenal

HT50

50% hemolysis time

MALDI

matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization

PBS

phosphate-buffered saline

ROS

reactive oxygen species

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche, the Université de La Réunion, the "Structure fédérative de recherche biosécurité en milieu tropical (BIOST) and by the European Regional Development Funds RE0001897 (EU- Région Réunion -French State national counterpart)."

References

  • 1.Hu FB, Satija A, Manson JE (2015) Curbing the Diabetes Pandemic: The Need for Global Policy Solutions. JAMA 313: 2319–2320. 10.1001/jama.2015.5287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cooper ME, El-Osta A, Allen TJ, Watson AMD, Thomas MC, et al. (2018) Metabolic Karma-The Atherogenic Legacy of Diabetes: The 2017 Edwin Bierman Award Lecture. Diabetes 67: 785–790. 10.2337/dbi18-0010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sarwar N, Gao P, Seshasai SR, Gobin R, Kaptoge S, et al. (2010) Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet 375: 2215–2222. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60484-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sies H (2015) Oxidative stress: a concept in redox biology and medicine. Redox Biol 4: 180–183. 10.1016/j.redox.2015.01.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jaisson S, Gillery P (2010) Evaluation of nonenzymatic posttranslational modification-derived products as biomarkers of molecular aging of proteins. Clin Chem 56: 1401–1412. 10.1373/clinchem.2010.145201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rondeau P, Bourdon E (2011) The glycation of albumin: structural and functional impacts. Biochimie 93: 645–658. 10.1016/j.biochi.2010.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chilelli NC, Burlina S, Lapolla A (2013) AGEs, rather than hyperglycemia, are responsible for microvascular complications in diabetes: a "glycoxidation-centric" point of view. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 23: 913–919. 10.1016/j.numecd.2013.04.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pitocco D, Tesauro M, Alessandro R, Ghirlanda G, Cardillo C (2013) Oxidative stress in diabetes: implications for vascular and other complications. Int J Mol Sci 14: 21525–21550. 10.3390/ijms141121525 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pandey KB, Rizvi SI (2010) Markers of oxidative stress in erythrocytes and plasma during aging in humans. Oxid Med Cell Longev 3: 2–12. 10.4161/oxim.3.1.10476 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cimen MY (2008) Free radical metabolism in human erythrocytes. Clin Chim Acta 390: 1–11. 10.1016/j.cca.2007.12.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Neelam S, Kakhniashvili DG, Wilkens S, Levene SD, Goodman SR (2011) Functional 20S proteasomes in mature human red blood cells. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 236: 580–591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Saito Y, Akazawa-Ogawa Y, Matsumura A, Saigoh K, Itoh S, et al. (2016) Oxidation and interaction of DJ-1 with 20S proteasome in the erythrocytes of early stage Parkinson's disease patients. Sci Rep 6: 30793 10.1038/srep30793 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Martin-Ventura JL, Madrigal-Matute J, Martinez-Pinna R, Ramos-Mozo P, Blanco-Colio LM, et al. (2012) Erythrocytes, leukocytes and platelets as a source of oxidative stress in chronic vascular diseases: detoxifying mechanisms and potential therapeutic options. Thromb Haemost 108: 435–442. 10.1160/TH12-04-0248 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Avci E, Kiris T, Demirtas AO, Kadi H (2018) Relationship between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and the red cell distribution width in patients with coronary artery disease. Lipids Health Dis 17: 53 10.1186/s12944-018-0709-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tziakas DN, Chalikias GK, Stakos D, Boudoulas H (2009) The role of red blood cells in the progression and instability of atherosclerotic plaque. Int J Cardiol 142: 2–7. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.10.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Delbosc S, Bayles RG, Laschet J, Ollivier V, Ho-Tin-Noe B, et al. (2017) Erythrocyte Efferocytosis by the Arterial Wall Promotes Oxidation in Early-Stage Atheroma in Humans. Front Cardiovasc Med 4: 43 10.3389/fcvm.2017.00043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Paradela-Dobarro B, Rodino-Janeiro BK, Alonso J, Raposeiras-Roubin S, Gonzalez-Peteiro M, et al. (2015) Key structural and functional differences between early and advanced glycation products. J Mol Endocrinol 56: 23–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Murtiashaw MH, Young JE, Strickland AL, McFarland KF, Thorpe SR, et al. (1983) Measurement of nonenzymatically glucosylated serum protein by an improved thiobarbituric acid assay. Clin Chim Acta 130: 177–187. 10.1016/0009-8981(83)90115-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pereira Morais MP, Marshall D, Flower SE, Caunt CJ, James TD, et al. (2013) Analysis of protein glycation using fluorescent phenylboronate gel electrophoresis. Sci Rep 3: 1437 10.1038/srep01437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kassaar O, Pereira Morais M, Xu S, Adam EL, Chamberlain RC, et al. (2017) Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor is subjected to glucose modification and oxidation in Alzheimer's Disease. Sci Rep 7: 42874 10.1038/srep42874 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Baraka-Vidot J, Planesse C, Meilhac O, Militello V, van den Elsen J, et al. (2015) Glycation alters ligand binding, enzymatic, and pharmacological properties of human albumin. Biochemistry 54: 3051–3062. 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Prost M (1992) Process for the determination by means of free radicals of the antioxidant properties of a living organism or a potentially aggressive age. United States. Patent 5.135.850. Aug 4
  • 23.Dobi A, Bravo SB, Veeren B, Paradela-Dobarro B, Alvarez E, et al. (2019) Advanced glycation end-products disrupt human endothelial cells redox homeostasis: new insights into reactive oxygen species production. Free Radic Res 53: 150–169. 10.1080/10715762.2018.1529866 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Patche J, Girard D, Catan A, Boyer F, Dobi A, et al. (2017) Diabetes-induced hepatic oxidative stress: a new pathogenic role for glycated albumin. Free Radic Biol Med 102: 133–148. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.11.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Everse J, Johnson MC, Marini MA (1994) Peroxidative activities of hemoglobin and hemoglobin derivatives. Methods Enzymol 231: 547–561. 10.1016/0076-6879(94)31038-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Parrow NL, Violet PC, Tu H, Nichols J, Pittman CA, et al. (2018) Measuring Deformability and Red Cell Heterogeneity in Blood by Ektacytometry. J Vis Exp. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chamberlain JJ, Johnson EL, Leal S, Rhinehart AS, Shubrook JH, et al. (2018) Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Review of the American Diabetes Association Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2018. Ann Intern Med 168: 640–650. 10.7326/M18-0222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Viskupicova J, Blaskovic D, Galiniak S, Soszynski M, Bartosz G, et al. (2015) Effect of high glucose concentrations on human erythrocytes in vitro. Redox Biol 5: 381–387. 10.1016/j.redox.2015.06.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Reneman RS, Hoeks AP (2008) Wall shear stress as measured in vivo: consequences for the design of the arterial system. Med Biol Eng Comput 46: 499–507. 10.1007/s11517-008-0330-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bratosin D, Mazurier J, Tissier JP, Estaquier J, Huart JJ, et al. (1998) Cellular and molecular mechanisms of senescent erythrocyte phagocytosis by macrophages. A review. Biochimie 80: 173–195. 10.1016/s0300-9084(98)80024-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pretorius E (2017) Erythrocyte deformability and eryptosis during inflammation, and impaired blood rheology. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 69: 545–550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Friguet B (2006) Oxidized protein degradation and repair in ageing and oxidative stress. FEBS Lett 580: 2910–2916. 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.03.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jay D, Hitomi H, Griendling KK (2006) Oxidative stress and diabetic cardiovascular complications. Free Radic Biol Med 40: 183–192. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2005.06.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lechuga-Sancho AM, Gallego-Andujar D, Ruiz-Ocana P, Visiedo FM, Saez-Benito A, et al. (2015) Obesity induced alterations in redox homeostasis and oxidative stress are present from an early age. PLoS One 13: e0191547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Stadtman ER, Moskovitz J, Levine RL (2003) Oxidation of methionine residues of proteins: biological consequences. Antioxid Redox Signal 5: 577–582. 10.1089/152308603770310239 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chondrogianni N, Petropoulos I, Grimm S, Georgila K, Catalgol B, et al. (2012) Protein damage, repair and proteolysis. Mol Aspects Med 35: 1–71. 10.1016/j.mam.2012.09.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhang Q, Monroe ME, Schepmoes AA, Clauss TR, Gritsenko MA, et al. (2011) Comprehensive identification of glycated peptides and their glycation motifs in plasma and erythrocytes of control and diabetic subjects. J Proteome Res 10: 3076–3088. 10.1021/pr200040j [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Margetis PI, Antonelou MH, Petropoulos IK, Margaritis LH, Papassideri IS (2009) Increased protein carbonylation of red blood cell membrane in diabetic retinopathy. Exp Mol Pathol 87: 76–82. 10.1016/j.yexmp.2009.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Dinender K Singla

22 Jan 2020

PONE-D-19-34544

Enhanced oxidative stress and damage in glycated erythrocytes

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Bourdon,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised by the reviewer. These are major revisions; therefore, we anticipate addressing al the points raised during review process.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript within the next 3 to 6 months. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Dinender K Singla

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements:

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for your ethics statement:

- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion

- ERMIES (NCT01425866)

- data were analyzed anonymously'

Please amend your current ethics statement to confirm that your named institutional review board or ethics committee specifically approved this study.

Once you have amended this/these statement(s) in the Methods section of the manuscript, please add the same text to the “Ethics Statement” field of the submission form (via “Edit Submission”).

For additional information about PLOS ONE ethical requirements for human subjects research, please refer to http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-human-subjects-research.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

"This work was supported by the Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche, the

Université de La Réunion and by the European Regional Development Funds RE0001897 (EURégion

Réunion -French State national counterpart).

CT is a recipient of a fellowship grant from the Ministère de l'Education Nationale, de

l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche, La Réunion University (Contrat Doctoral)."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

"The author(s) received no specific funding for this work."

4. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels.

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

5. We note that you have included the phrase “data not shown” in your manuscript. Unfortunately, this does not meet our data sharing requirements. PLOS does not permit references to inaccessible data. We require that authors provide all relevant data within the paper, Supporting Information files, or in an acceptable, public repository. Please add a citation to support this phrase or upload the data that corresponds with these findings to a stable repository (such as Figshare or Dryad) and provide and URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers that may be used to access these data. Or, if the data are not a core part of the research being presented in your study, we ask that you remove the phrase that refers to these data.

6. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Manuscript ID PONE-19-34544 presents interesting data on the effects of glycation on measures of erythrocyte structure, oxidative state and uptake/breakdown by endothelial cells. In general the manuscript is well-written.

Major Comments:

-Have the antibodies been validated for the dot blots and western blots? Were positive or negative controls performed?

-It is interesting that the western blots showed an initial increase in AGEs following incubation with G5 and G25, but not with G137 whereas the dot blots showed significantly higher AGEs at G25 and G137.

-Line 247: These HT50 data are shown in figure 1C, not figure 3. It is interesting that the HT50 trend is no longer seen with the G137 dose. Might that be related to the loss of AGE increase at the highest dose as well?

-Discussion material (references) should not appear in the results section of a manuscript. As currently written, the results section reads more like a combined results and discussion section. Justification for the various assays could also be moved to the methods describing them.

-Line 277 mentions a progressive increase in DCF fluorescence. However, only the highest dose of glucose produced significantly greater fluorescence than G0. Therefore, I do not think one can conclude that the fluorescence was progressively increased.

-Line 288: mentions that peroxidase activity was significantly reduced in G137 cells compared to G25. However, the table indicates a significant difference between G137 and G0 cells.

-Figure S6 seems to show variability in the amount of glycation within the diabetic samples with only 2 showing increased glycation. Were these samples from 4 different subjects?

-Line 330 mentions a significant reduction in SOD in the diabetic samples. However, this significance is not shown in table 4.

-Lines 336-337: mentions that the phosphatidylserine exposure was significantly higher in diabetic samples. This conclusion cannot be made as the p-value was not significant (0.051). Moreover, the conclusion regarding this variable in the discussion is likewise an overstatement (lines 349-351).

-It is interesting that the in vitro exposed cells showed reduced LLVY with glycation whereas this variable was increased in the diabetic samples. What could explain this difference? It appears the in vitro experiments do not accurately model this variable.

Minor Comments:

-Lines 100, 224: Did you mean “fructosamine” as opposed to “frutosamine”?

-Inter- and intra-assay coefficients were provided for the free radical-induced hemolysis test, but not for other assays.

-Have the SOD and catalase activity assays been previously validated? (ie. Provide citations)

-What is meant by “fixed erythrocytes”, line 168? Do you mean affixed to the plate?

-Table 1 and figures should be able to stand alone from a paper. Please define G0, G5, G25, and G137 in the table legend.

-Figure 2: The labelling is confusing as the group of 4 figures do not need separate A-D labels. Consider labeling A-D, simply “A”.

-Line 281-282: It is mentioned that 4-HNE was higher in G25 and G137 erythrocytes compared to G5. Were levels not also higher than G0?

-lines 362-363: “glycated erythrocyte lysis when glycated”??

-Line 373: delete “Pr”

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Jul 6;15(7):e0235335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235335.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


6 Mar 2020

Academic Editor

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements.

We did ensure our manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements including those for file naming.

2. Ethics statement.

We did amend our current ethics statement to confirm that our study was specifically approved by the named institutional review board or ethics committee in the Methods section of our manuscript. Also, we added the same text to the “Ethics Statement” field of the submission form (via “Edit Submission”).

3. Acknowledgments Section.

Any funding-related text from the manuscript was removed.

Our funding statement was updated:

"This work was supported by the Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche, the Université de La Réunion, the "Structure fédérative de recherche biosécurité en milieu tropical (BIOST) and by the European Regional Development Funds RE0001897 (EU- Région Réunion -French State national counterpart)."

4 PLOS ONE Policy on Figure Preparation

All six images displayed in our MS (figures 1A, 3B, S3A and S6) were prepared in accordance with PLOS ONE Policy on Figure Preparation:

They were not be adjusted in any way that could affect the scientific information displayed.

Images in figures are not overcropped around the bands of interest.

All relevant samples for comparative analysis were run on the same gel/blot.

In the figures of our MS there are no composite images of bands originating from different blots.

5. The phrase “data not shown”

The phrase “data not shown” has been removed in the revised version of our manuscript.

6. Supporting Information

Captions for our Supporting Information files were included at the end of your manuscript, and any in-text citations were updated to match accordingly.

Reviewer #1:

Major Comments:

-Have the antibodies been validated for the dot blots and western blots? Were positive or negative controls performed?

Antibodies used in this study, anti-AGE (ab23722) and anti-4-HNE (ab46545) have been validated for western blots and also for ELISA and immunohistochemistry. Positive controls were performed. For 4-HNE and AGE dot blots, oxidized low density lipoproteins (ox LDL) and glycated albumin (GA) were used as positive controls, respectively.

Here are examples of AGE and 4-HNE dot blots including positive controls:(photos are included in the cover letter)

-It is interesting that the western blots showed an initial increase in AGEs following incubation with G5 and G25, but not with G137 whereas the dot blots showed significantly higher AGEs at G25 and G137.

Yes we agree, AGE evaluation by using western blot and dot blot techniques, evidenced increase AGE accumulation in glycated erythrocytes compared to control (G0 erythrocytes).

If significant increase AGE accumulation was measured by using dot blot for G25 and G137 compared with the control (Fig 1), the increase was significant when using western blot with G5 and G25, but not with G137 compared to the control (Fig S3). This slight difference in terms of statistical difference may arise from a more accurate quantification of dot blot signal than the signal quantification on western blot. Results in term of significant increase in AGE accumulation in our glycated erythrocyte preparations were comforted by different techniques, dot blot, western blot, mass spectrometry and also by the determination of glycated hemoglobin (% HbA1c), the 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and the early glycation product (EGP) levels.

-Line 247: These HT50 data are shown in figure 1C, not figure 3. It is interesting that the HT50 trend is no longer seen with the G137 dose. Might that be related to the loss of AGE increase at the highest dose as well?

Thank you for pointing this out to us. The figure number has been corrected.

We agree, HT50 trend is no longer seen with the G137 dose. As previously written, significant increases in AGE accumulation in our glycated erythrocyte preparation were comforted by different techniques, dot blot, western blot, mass spectrometry and also by the determination of glycated hemoglobin (% HbA1c), the 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and the early glycation product (EGP) levels. All data obtained, but western blot quantification, evidenced significant AGE accumulation increase for G137 samples compared to the control.

Hence, we would rather think that this lower capacity of G137 sample to resist to a free radical-induced hemolysis may come from AGE accumulation.

-Discussion material (references) should not appear in the results section of a manuscript. As currently written, the results section reads more like a combined results and discussion section. Justification for the various assays could also be moved to the methods describing them.

As suggested discussion material including references were moved to the method section.

-Line 277 mentions a progressive increase in DCF fluorescence. However, only the highest dose of glucose produced significantly greater fluorescence than G0. Therefore, I do not think one can conclude that the fluorescence was progressively increased.

We agree, we modified our text and removed the term "progressive increase".

-Line 288: mentions that peroxidase activity was significantly reduced in G137 cells compared to G25. However, the table indicates a significant difference between G137 and G0 cells.

Thank you for pointing this out to us, text was corrected.

-Figure S6 seems to show variability in the amount of glycation within the diabetic samples with only 2 showing increased glycation. Were these samples from 4 different subjects?

Yes, these samples were from 4 different subjects, 4 diabetic and 4 non-diabetic individuals.

If variability was observed in the amount of glycation within the diabetic samples (Fig S6), AGE quantification revealed a significantly higher accumulation in erythrocytes from diabetics compared to erythrocytes from non-diabetic individuals (Fig 4E).

-Line 330 mentions a significant reduction in SOD in the diabetic samples. However, this significance is not shown in table 4.

Thank you, our text was modified:

"Although catalase and SOD activities appeared not to be significantly different between both groups (ND vs. D), a significant reduced peroxidase activity was measured in erythrocytes isolated from diabetic persons (table 4). This reduction in peroxidase activity, associated with high glucose concentration, could explain the enhanced ROS formation in erythrocytes isolated from diabetic persons."

-Lines 336-337: mentions that the phosphatidylserine exposure was significantly higher in diabetic samples. This conclusion cannot be made as the p-value was not significant (0.051). Moreover, the conclusion regarding this variable in the discussion is likewise an overstatement (lines 349-351).

We agree and therefore changed our text. Line 336 337 we wrote "Erythrocytes from diabetic persons exhibit a tendency for a higher phosphatidylserine exposure than erythrocytes isolated from non-diabetic persons."

Lane 351 we wrote " Furthermore, we highlight a potentially higher phosphatidylserine exposure of erythrocytes when glycated."

-It is interesting that the in vitro exposed cells showed reduced LLVY with glycation whereas this variable was increased in the diabetic samples. What could explain this difference? It appears the in vitro experiments do not accurately model this variable.

Yes, this is indeed very interesting!

We developed on this in the revised version of our MS. Briefly, if proteasome activity may be activated under moderate oxidative stress, in higher oxidant conditions a decrease in proteolytic activity may occur [1]. Friguet et al., identified the 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) as a specific oxidant that can inhibit proteasome activity though its binding to the enzymatic protein complex [1].

In vitro, significant reduction in the chymotrypsin-like activity of the proteasome (LLVY) was associated with a significant accumulation of the oxidative biomarker 4-HNE in erythrocytes glycated with 25 and 137 mM glucose. In vivo, if oxidative stress was higher in erythrocytes from diabetics than from non-diabetics, no variation was measured in term of 4-HNE accumulation. We think that enhanced oxidative stress in in vivo glycated erythrocytes if significant may be moderate enough to trigger proteasome LLVY activation.

Minor Comments:

-Lines 100, 224: Did you mean “fructosamine” as opposed to “frutosamine”?

The text was corrected. Fructosamine correct term was used.

-Inter- and intra-assay coefficients were provided for the free radical-induced hemolysis test, but not for other assays.

Yes, all assays used in our study were validated with citations provided and we keep at heart to give maximum information about our techniques such as inter and intra coefficient assay, which we only have for the free radical-induced hemolysis test as it was developed and patented in my former research group [2]. This later citation is provided in the revised version of our MS.

-Have the SOD and catalase activity assays been previously validated? (ie. Provide citations)

Yes, SOD and catalase activity assays were previously validated. A citation of a very recent work published by our group was included in the new revised version of our MS: [3]

-What is meant by “fixed erythrocytes”, line 168? Do you mean affixed to the plate?

After 24-hours of incubation with erythrocytes, endothelial cells were washed 3 times with PBS and treated with water for 3 minutes to induce lysis (by hypotonic shock) of any fixed erythrocytes at the cellular membrane surface and supernatant was discarded.

This text was included in the new version of our revised MS.

-Table 1 and figures should be able to stand alone from a paper. Please define G0, G5, G25, and G137 in the table legend.

This is an excellent suggestion. Our different erythrocyte preparations G0, G5, G25, and G137 are now defined in the table and figure legend in the revised version of our MS.

-Figure 2: The labelling is confusing as the group of 4 figures do not need separate A-D labels. Consider labeling A-D, simply “A”.

We agree. Figure labelling was changed. Previous figure 2AD is now figure 2A and previous figure 2E is now figure 2B.

-Line 281-282: It is mentioned that 4-HNE was higher in G25 and G137 erythrocytes compared to G5. Were levels not also higher than G0?

Actually 4-HNE levels were significantly higher in G25 and G137 erythrocytes compared to G5.

-lines 362-363: “glycated erythrocyte lysis when glycated”??

Thank you, our text was corrected.

-Line 373: delete “Pr”

Text was corrected.

References:

1. Friguet B (2006) Oxidized protein degradation and repair in ageing and oxidative stress. FEBS Lett 580: 2910-2916.

2. Prost M (1992) Process for the determination by means of free radicals of the antioxidant properties of a living organism or a potentially aggressive age. United States.Patent 5.135.850. Aug 4

3. Dobi A, Bravo SB, Veeren B, Paradela-Dobarro B, Alvarez E, et al. (2019) Advanced glycation end-products disrupt human endothelial cells redox homeostasis: new insights into reactive oxygen species production. Free Radic Res 53: 150-169.

Decision Letter 1

Ping Song

5 May 2020

PONE-D-19-34544R1

Enhanced oxidative stress and damage in glycated erythrocytes

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Bourdon,

Thank you for submitting your revised manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. These are minor revisions. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Jun 19 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ping Song, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: The highlight of this manuscript is relatively comprehensive comparison on the structure change, redox status and the EC phagocytosis of erythrocytes under the condition of glycation between in vivo and invitro. But there are still some parts needed to be improved and further explained. Some of the results showed opposite phonotype in in vitro and in vivo, which should be well discussed.

Majors:

In the hemolysis study, the results indicate that low concentrated glucose incubation had a protective membrane-stabilizing effect, which means an increased “flexibility” of the cell membrane or less fragile membrane. However, in the test of deformability, elongation index was reduced after glucose incubation, which suggests a reduced “flexibility” of the cell membrane and/or cytoskeleton. How does the authors explain these possible “conflict” phonotypes?

In some papers (for example PMID: 31704555), erythrocytes from diabetes showed impaired hemolysis resistance, which is opposite the phenomenon observed in this manuscript. Do the in vitro and in vivo glycations lead to different hemolysis results?

The high glucose concentration may change the osmolarity of the solution and making the solution hypertonic, therefore the cells may already in a shrank state in the initial stage, which may cause influence on the results. Did the authors detect the cell morphology with microscopy?

The proteasome activity detected in in vitro and in vivo showed opposite results in the manuscript. When treated with high glucose level, impaired proteasome activity was detected. But the proteasome activity from the diabetic erythrocytes showed an increased activity. How does the author explain these results?

Minors:

The data analysis used in Table2 & 3 should be One-way ANOVA.

If possible, can the author add the AOPP data back?

In the method section, water was used to induce lysis of the erythrocytes sticking on the surface of ECs. EC adhesion is not very strong. Does this method also wash away some EC and affect the quantification of internalized erythrocytes?

The figures need to be reorganized. The supplementary figures can be integrated in regular figure as well.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Jul 6;15(7):e0235335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235335.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


5 Jun 2020

Majors:

In the hemolysis study, the results indicate that low concentrated glucose incubation had a protective membrane-stabilizing effect, which means an increased “flexibility” of the cell membrane or less fragile membrane. However, in the test of deformability, elongation index was reduced after glucose incubation, which suggests a reduced “flexibility” of the cell membrane and/or cytoskeleton. How does the authors explain these possible “conflict” phonotypes?

It is true, erythrocytes incubated with low glucose concentration exhibit an enhanced resistance to free radical-induced hemolysis concomitantly with an impaired flexibility of their membrane. Then, results obtained in the hemolysis and deformability tests may appear conflictual. Actually, these two tests did not assess the same biological phenomenon. Our in vitro free radical-induced blood hemolysis test allows determination of erythrocyte capacity to resist to an oxidative stress mediated by a free radical generator (AAPH), a chemical agent. Results were expressed as the half time of hemolysis (HT50) and reported on figure 2E.

The deformability of the different erythrocyte preparations was analysed by ektacytometry. This methodology allows elongation index determination, a biophysical index which expresses erythrocyte deformability capacity in response to increasing shear stress (Fig 2F and 2G).

Hence, if our “hemolysis test” measures erythrocyte capacity to resist to hemolysis when submitted to a free radical generator, elongation index specifically expresses membrane flexibility/rigidity. In other words, these two different methods give two types of results.

Concerning results, erythrocytes that have been incubated with high glucose concentrations exhibit both impaired hemolysis resistance capacity (2E) and reduced membrane flexibility (Fig 2F and 2G).

In some papers (for example PMID: 31704555), erythrocytes from diabetes showed impaired hemolysis resistance, which is opposite the phenomenon observed in this manuscript. Do the in vitro and in vivo glycations lead to different hemolysis results?

Thank you for mentioning this.

We agree, in some papers, erythrocytes from diabetes showed impaired hemolysis resistance. Please note, the mentioned reference (PMID: 31704555) is a recent article from our group. In this article, erythrocytes from diabetic patients exhibited a slight non-significant decrease in free radical-induced hemolysis half time in comparison with erythrocytes from non-diabetic (Cf fig A).

Figure 1 is issued from Catan et al (2019) Atherosclerosis.

Considering phenomenon observed in our present manuscript, if erythrocytes in vitro incubated with 5 or 25 mM of glucose (G5, G25) exhibited a higher HT50 compared to G0 (Figure 2E), those incubated with 137 mM of glucose (G137) do not exhibit such hemolysis resistance any more. In addition, HbA1c measurement in our in vitro glycated preparations revealed that values obtained for G137 erythrocytes (7%) were highly similar to HbA1c values observed in diabetic patients (table 1).

Hence, in our experimental conditions, in vitro and in vivo glycation lead to similar hemolysis results.

Finally, please note in our present study, a slight non-significant impairment in HT50 for erythrocytes was also observed when isolated from diabetics when compared to non-diabetic (Cf figure 2).

Figure 2. This figure was established with data from the present study.

The high glucose concentration may change the osmolarity of the solution and making the solution hypertonic, therefore the cells may already in a shrank state in the initial stage, which may cause influence on the results. Did the authors detect the cell morphology with microscopy?

It is true, high glucose concentration may change the osmolarity of the solution making cell potentially in a shrank state in the initial stage.

In our experimental conditions, we did not observe strong evidence of such phenomenon by microscopy (fig 3). If an increased number erythrocyte ghosts is observed when incubated with increasing glucose concentrations (see arrows), most erythrocytes does not exhibit a significant shrank state in relation to glucose concentration.

In addition, if such phenomenon would occur, please note our erythrocyte preparations used in the present MS, were washed in an isotonic solution prior analysis.

Figure 3. This figure corresponds to erythrocyte preparations that were incubated with 5 (A), 50 (B) or 100 (C) mM glucose for five days. Please note these preparations were not washed in an isotonic solution prior microscopic analysis. Bar corresponds to 10 µm.

The proteasome activity detected in in vitro and in vivo showed opposite results in the manuscript. When treated with high glucose level, impaired proteasome activity was detected. But the proteasome activity from the diabetic erythrocytes showed an increased activity. How does the author explain these results?

We agree with this and explanations are provided in our revised version of our MS.

Page 14 we wrote:

“Conversely, the chymotrypsin-like activity of the proteasome appeared to be significantly enhanced in erythrocytes purified from diabetics compared to those from non-diabetics (table 4). Proteasome activity may be activated under moderate oxidative stress [1]. In vivo, if oxidative stress is higher in erythrocytes from diabetics than from non-diabetics, no variation was measured in term of 4-HNE accumulation. Enhanced oxidative stress in in vivo glycated erythrocytes may be significant and moderate enough to trigger proteasome LLVY activation.”

Minors:

The data analysis used in Table2 & 3 should be One-way ANOVA.

We followed Reviewer’s advice and used One-way ANOVA for statistical analysis in table 2 and 3.

Modifications in the revised version of our MS were reported lines 236, 287 and 289.

If possible, can the author add the AOPP data back?

We followed Reviewer’s advice, page 14 we wrote “In addition, accumulation of advanced oxidation product (AOPP), was found to be higher (+18%) in erythrocytes from diabetics but this increase did not reach significance.”

In the method section, water was used to induce lysis of the erythrocytes sticking on the surface of ECs. EC adhesion is not very strong. Does this method also wash away some EC and affect the quantification of internalized erythrocytes?

Yes, we did use water to induce lysis of erythrocytes sticking on the surface of cultured endothelial cells. This method may indeed wash away some endothelial cells and such phenomenon was noticed when cells were treated with highly glycated erythrocytes. Still, this phenomenon could not affect our results since enhanced internalization of erythrocytes was significant and observed in endothelial cells that have been incubated with glycated erythrocytes. In addition, please note erythrocyte phagocytosis by endothelial cells was confirmed by recent unpublished data using flow cytometry and confocal microscopy. These results would be part of a future MS.

The figures need to be reorganized. The supplementary figures can be integrated in regular figure as well.

According to Reviewer’s advice, our figures were reorganized in the new version of our MS.

Four previous supplementary figures are now integrated in regular figures in the present version of our MS.

It concerns:

- Figure #1 (previous figure S1): Early glycation product detection by using fluorescent boronic acids.

- Figure 2C and 2D (previous figure S3): Enhanced AGE formation in glycated erythrocytes.

- Figure 5E (previous figure S5): Enhanced oxidative stress in erythrocytes from diabetics.

- Figure 5G (previous figure S6): Enhanced AGE content in erythrocytes from diabetics.

[1] Friguet, B. Oxidized protein degradation and repair in ageing and oxidative stress. FEBS Lett 580:2910-2916; 2006.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to rev June 5th 2020.docx

Decision Letter 2

Ping Song

15 Jun 2020

Enhanced oxidative stress and damage in glycated erythrocytes

PONE-D-19-34544R2

Dear Dr. Bourdon,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Ping Song, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

The authors have addressed the concerns raised by two reviewers. The manuscript is acceptable in PLOS ONE.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: They authors have addressed all the comments. But the figures still need reorganization to be appropriated displayed in a printed page. A single figure should is composed of multiple well-arranged graphs. The authors' figures still display as individual graph which does not meet the requirement of publication. Please look at the figure pattern in other published PLOS papers.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Ping Song

17 Jun 2020

PONE-D-19-34544R2

Enhanced oxidative stress and damage in glycated erythrocytes

Dear Dr. Bourdon:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Ping Song

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File

    (DOCX)

    S1 Fig. Characterisation of glycation percentage in the different erythrocyte preparations by mass spectrometry.

    Representative figures of the mass spectra obtained in three independent experiments for each incubation condition: 0 (G0), 5 (G5), 25 (G25) and 137 (G137) mmol/l glucose. On each spectrum, four main peaks were obtained corresponding to α-hemoglobin (αHb; 15130 Da), glycated α-hemoglobin (gαHb; 15330 Da), β-hemoglobin (βHb; 15890 Da), glycated β-hemoglobin (gβHb; 16100 Da).

    (DOCX)

    S2 Fig. Diabetes alters erythrocyte morphology.

    Typical Forward Scatter (FSC) and Side Scatter (SSC) characteristics represented in dot-blot graph obtained by cytometry erythrocytes from non diabetic (left) and diabetic persons (right).

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to rev June 5th 2020.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES