Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2020 Mar 25;30(8):4709–4710. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06793-x

Correction to: Physical evaluation of an ultra-high-resolution CT scanner

Luuk J Oostveen 1,, Kirsten L Boedeker 2, Monique Brink 1, Mathias Prokop 1, Frank de Lange 1, Ioannis Sechopoulos 1
PMCID: PMC7338809  PMID: 32215693

Correction to: European Radiology

10.1007/s00330-019-06635-5

The original version of this article, published on 10 February 2019, unfortunately contained a mistake. The axes of the graphs in Fig. 3 are incorrect. The correct figure is given below. Therefore, the last two sentences in “Results”, section “Noise”, should read: “The peak frequency of the HR and SHR was 0.21 lp/mm. For the NR mode and the MDCT, the peak frequencies were 0.17 lp/mm and 0.21 lp/mm, respectively.”

Fig. B2.

Fig. B2

Normalised NPS for (left) Hybrid-IR (AIDR 3De) and (right) FBP for different dose settings in HR resolution mode

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Subtracted and unsubtracted NPS for the UHRCT in (left) HR and SHR modes and (right) for the NR mode and MDCT. Images are reconstructed using AIDR 3D enhanced reconstruction technique with FC08 filter kernel

The X-axis of the graphs in Fig. B2 (Addendum B) has the same issue. The correct figure is given below. These changes do not affect any conclusion drawn from the results.

Footnotes

The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1007/s00330-019-06635-5


Articles from European Radiology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES