Abstract
Purpose:
Pediatric cardiomyopathy is rare, has a broad differential diagnosis, results in high morbidity and mortality, and has sub-optimal diagnostic yield using next generation sequencing panels. Exome sequencing has reported diagnostic yields ranging from 30-57% for neonates in intensive care units. We aimed to characterize the clinical utility of exome sequencing in infantile heart failure.
Methods:
Infants diagnosed with acute heart failure prior to 1 year old over a period of 34 months at a large tertiary children’s hospital were recruited. Demographic and diagnostic information was obtained from medical records. Fifteen eligible patients were enrolled.
Results:
Dilated cardiomyopathy was the predominant cardiac diagnosis, seen in 60% of patients. Molecular diagnosis was identified in 66.7% of patients (10/15). Of those diagnoses, 70% would not have been detected using multi-gene next generation sequencing panels focused on cardiomyopathy or arrhythmia disease genes. Genetic testing changed medical decision-making in 53% of all cases and 80% of positive cases, and was especially beneficial when testing was expedited.
Conclusions:
Given the broad differential diagnosis and critical status of infants with heart failure, rapid exome sequencing provides timely diagnoses, changes medical management, and should be the first-tier molecular test.
Keywords: exome sequencing, heart failure, cardiomyopathy, pediatric, clinical utility
INTRODUCTION
Pediatric cardiomyopathy is a rare condition of the myocardium occurring in approximately 4.4 in 100,000 infants per year1–3. Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is the most common subtype affecting the pediatric population, followed by hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), restrictive cardiomyopathy, and then a mixed or other cardiomyopathy phenotype3. In one study, 46% of patients with pediatric DCM progressed to death or transplant within the first 5 years of diagnosis, highlighting the often devastating outcomes of pediatric cardiomyopathy1. The etiologies for pediatric patients with cardiomyopathy are varied and include infections, metabolic diseases, syndromic diagnoses, non-syndromic familial cardiomyopathy, and idiopathic cardiomyopathy4–8.
Yield of genetic testing varies widely based on the phenotype, age of presentation, and type of testing pursued. Many recent studies have demonstrated a diagnostic yield between 33% and 58% of patients who received exome or genome sequencing for any indication while in a neonatal intensive care unit or while critically ill10–14. Exome and genome sequencing provide rapid results for patients and families and also change medical management in up to half of cases11, 13. Next generation sequencing panels identify a genetic diagnosis in 10-60% of cardiomyopathy cases, depending on the subtype and cohort5. In one cohort of patients with pediatric dilated cardiomyopathy, multi-gene panel testing yielded a diagnosis in 54% of patients whereas exome sequencing identified a genetic diagnosis in 87% (13/15) of probands9. Herein, we report the experience of a large tertiary children’s hospital and cardiac transplant center with exome sequencing in neonates and infants with acute presentations of heart failure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Eighteen patients presented to our institution with heart failure within the first year of life and were evaluated by metabolic and genetics physicians as part of their clinical care between June 2016 and May 2019. Participants were consented into one of two institutional review board approved pediatric genomic sequencing studies at CHOP (IRB #16-013231 and IRB #18-014911) for this prospective observational study. These protocols include permission for publication of de-identified patient data. All appropriate consent and protocol forms have been archived. Three patients (two with DCM, one with HCM) were not enrolled due to parental decision to not participate in this study. Exclusion criteria included anatomic congenital heart disease sufficient to cause the degree of heart failure and age at presentation of greater than 12 months.
Clinical genetic testing recommendations were made by the clinical team per standard of care, and included either standard or rapid exome sequencing with or without concurrent mitochondrial sequencing. Standard exome sequencing was performed by GeneDx (Gaithersburg, MD) or the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia’s Division of Genomic Diagnostics (Philadelphia, PA). All mitochondrial sequencing and rapid exome sequencing were performed by GeneDx. XomeDxXpress was utilized for its rapid turnaround time of verbal result in seven days and written report in approximately two weeks in nine cases. All testing was trio based, including both parents, with the exception of patient 12 whose father was unavailable for testing. Pertinent demographic, diagnostic, and outcomes data was abstracted from their medical records.
Genetic testing was considered diagnostic when a likely pathogenic or pathogenic variant(s) were identified in gene(s) associated with the patient’s clinical features. In two cases, variants of uncertain significant (VUS) were included in the diagnostic category, as the patients had extra-cardiac features strongly consistent with these syndromic diagnoses (Table 1). One patient had a homozygous VUS in PPCS and had other features of PPCS deficiency including profound hypotonia and elevated creatine kinase levels. Another patient, who already carried a clinical diagnosis of Noonan syndrome, had one VUS in LZTR1, a Noonan syndrome gene.
Table 1.
Exome Sequencing Results in Infants with Acute Heart Failure
| Age at Diagnosis (Days) | Cardiac Diagnosis | Extracardiac Features | Exome Type | Gene | Variant | Classification | Diagnosis | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient 1 | 2 | DCM | microcephaly, hypoglycemia | rapid trio | NDUFB11 | c.262 C>T, p.R88X | pathogenic | NDUFB1-related disorder |
| Patient 2 | 212 | HCM | vPS, DD, short stature | standard trio | LZTR1 | c.1165C>T; p.L389F | VUS | Noonan syndrome |
| Patient 3 | 0 | HLHS + LVNC | rapid trio | MYH7 | c.1275_1277delGGCinsAGA; p.A426E | likely pathogenic | MYH7-related cardiomyopathy | |
| Patient 4 | 243 | HCM | lactic acidosis, FTT, DD | standard trio | ACAD9 | c.1240C>T; p.Arg414Cys | likely pathogenic | ACAD9 deficiency |
| c.1832A>G; p.Tyr611Cys | VUS | |||||||
| Patient 5 | 0 | HLHS + LVNC | rapid trio | PRKAG2 | c.698C>G; p.A233G | VUS | none | |
| Patient 6 | 35 | DCM | rapid trio + mito | n/a | n/a | n/a | none | |
| Patient 7 | 0 | DCM | rapid trio + mito | LAMA4 | c.503G>A; p.R168K | VUS | none | |
| Patient 8 | 10 | DCM | rapid trio | FLNC | c.4021C>T; p.R1341X | likely pathogenic | FLNC-related cardiomyopathy | |
| NFU1 | c.452delT, p.L151RfsX22 | VUS | ||||||
| TDGF1 | c.275G>A, p.G92E | VUS | ||||||
| Patient 9 | 30 | DCM | after diagnosis: early stage retinal dystrophy | rapid trio + mito | ALMS1 | c.928C>T, p.Q310X | pathogenic | Alström syndrome |
| c.3016_3017delCA, p.H1006X | pathogenic | |||||||
| Patient 10 | 61 | myocarditis | rapid trio + mito | BTK | c.1178-1G>A; IVS13-1G>A | pathogenic | X-linked agammaglobulinemia | |
| Patient 11 | 0 | DCM | rapid trio + mito | HCN4 | c.2330T>G; p.Leu777Arg | VUS | none | |
| Patient 12 | 0 | DCM | standard duo (mother) + mito | TNNI3K | c.1437delA; p.G480DfsX7 | VUS | none | |
| Patient 13 | 61 | DCM | respiratory insufficiency, hypotonia, elevated CK | standard trio + mito | PPCS | c.317G>C; p.Arg106Pro | VUS | PPCS-related disorder |
| LMNA | c.1685T>A; p.Leu562His | VUS | ||||||
| Patient 14 | 61 | HCM | low set ears, overfolded helices, eczema, developmental delay | standard trio + mito | NAA15 | c.1009_1012delGAAA; p.Glu337fs | pathogenic | NAA15-related disorder |
| Patient 15 | 1 | DCM | elevated long-chain species on acylcarnitine profile, lactic acidosis, elevated CK | rapid trio + mito | HADHB | c.1228_1240del; p.G410WfsX41 | likely pathogenic | Trifunctional Protein Deficiency |
| c. 181C>T; p.R61C | likely pathogenic |
Change in management for probands was defined as initiating targeted treatment based on genetic testing, consultation of other pertinent subspecialties, or redirection of care. Change in management for family members was defined as identifying genetic predisposition to cardiomyopathy in family members without a known history of cardiomyopathy, change in recurrence risk counseling, or clearance of family members from cardiac surveillance.
RESULTS
Fifteen patients with infantile heart failure who had exome sequencing recommended as part of their diagnostic evaluation were enrolled (Table 1). Of those, 60% of patients presented with dilated cardiomyopathy (Figure 1A). The median age of diagnosis of cardiomyopathy was 10 days (range zero days to eight months). Seven patients (46.7%) were diagnosed prenatally or within the first 48 hours of life (Figure 1B). Patient 11 was the only with a first- or second-degree relative with cardiomyopathy prior to the patient’s presentation. Rapid exome sequencing was sent for nine patients (60%), with a median written report turnaround time of 10 days (range 9-14). Standard exome sequencing in the remaining six patients had a median turnaround time of 42 days (range 29-71). Nine of fifteen (60%) had mitochondrial DNA sequencing at the time of exome sequencing, all of which was normal. At the time of publication, 9/15 (60%) patients were alive. All six deceased patients died as a result of redirection of care, either due to clinical status or genetic diagnosis. Two patients underwent successful cardiac transplantation.
Figure 1.

A: Cardiac Phenotype and B: Age at Diagnosis for Fifteen Infants Presenting with Heart Failure.
Exome sequencing was diagnostic in 10/15 (67.7%) of patients (Table 1; Supplemental Table 1). Seventy percent of these diagnoses would have been missed using standard cardiomyopathy panels at the majority of commercial laboratories investigated. All 6 patients with extracardiac manifestations prior to testing received diagnoses via exome sequencing. Four of 9 without extracardiac manifestations received diagnoses. Four metabolic or mitochondrial cardiomyopathies were identified: NDUF11-related disorder (OMIM #300403), ACAD9 deficiency (OMIM #611103) PPCS-related cardiomyopathy (OMIM #609853), and mitochondrial trifunctional protein deficiency (OMIM #609015). Four syndromic diagnoses were identified: Noonan syndrome (OMIM #600574), Alström syndrome (OMIM #203800), X-linked agammaglobulinemia (OMIM #300705), and NAA15-related neurodevelopmental disorder (OMIM #608000). Only two of 10 diagnoses were in primarily cardiac related genes: MYH7 (OMIM #613426) and FLNC (OMIM #102565).
Exome sequencing results changed the patient’s medical management in eight cases (53.3%) and changed familial management in two-thirds of cases. Three families chose to reorient care goals away from aggressive life support, such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, based on the genetic testing results and prognosis. In the case of ACAD9 deficiency, riboflavin supplementation was initiated in conjunction with other cardiac medications with subsequent resolution of his severe ventricular dysfunction and dilation, and improvement in left ventricular hypertrophy. For syndromic diagnoses, multiple subspecialist evaluations were initiated.
DISCUSSION
Exome sequencing in infantile heart failure has a high diagnostic yield (67%) in our cohort and impacted medical management in all diagnostic cases. Genes for 70% of diagnoses were not on cardiomyopathy panels and would have been missed without the use of exome sequencing. Extra-cardiac manifestations may have been challenging to identify in critically-ill neonates for many of the syndromic diagnoses identified in our cohort. As such, exome sequencing was critical for making a diagnosis and ensuring proper care, regardless of time to result, though additionally so for rapid testing. For example, Patient 9 was a healthy infant girl who presented with acute decompensated heart failure at 2 months of age and was identified to have Alström syndrome via rapid exome sequencing. Not only were results returned in a timely manner allowing the intensive care team to provide prognostication information for the family, but also other subspecialists were involved for the syndromic nature of this disease. The child has since been noted to have cone-rod dystrophy, photophobia, nystagmus, and elevated triglycerides. These manifestations of the disease were not identified until targeted subspecialist screening was initiated due to the molecular diagnosis. Additionally, her mother was able to have targeted genetic testing via chorionic villus sampling for her ongoing pregnancy, which confirmed the fetus was unaffected.
The diagnoses identified in this cohort demonstrate the wide clinical spectrum of diagnoses that can present with infantile heart failure, notably metabolic and syndromic diagnoses in the majority of patients with diagnostic exome sequencing. This highlights the importance of genetic and metabolism specialists in the diagnostic work-up for patients with infantile heart failure. While this study is limited by a relatively small cohort size at one medical center, infantile heart failure due to cardiomyopathy is a rare disease and diagnostic yields were consistent with other larger studies of exome sequencing in neonatal or pediatric intensive care units10–14. Further studies including cost-benefit analysis and multi-center prospective studies may help refine the diagnostic yield and clinical utility of rapid exome sequencing in this unique population. In conclusion, given the broad differential diagnosis and critical status of infants with heart failure, rapid exome sequencing provides timely diagnoses, changes medical management, and should be the first-tier molecular test for infantile heart failure.
Supplementary Material
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest:
The following authors have no conflicts of interest to declare for this manuscript: AR, EB, JB, CG, IK, KI, JL, KL, LM, AS, CS, and RAN.
JJ, DC, and SY are employees of GeneDx, Inc.
REFERENCES:
- 1.Towbin JA, Lowe AM, Colan SD, et al. Incidence, Causes, and Outcomes of Dilated Cardiomyopathy in Children. JAMA. 2006;296(15):1867–1876. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.15.1867 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lipshultz SE, Sleeper LA, Towbin JA, et al. The incidence of pediatric cardiomyopathy in two regions of the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(17):1647–1655. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021715 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wilkinson JD, Westphal JA, Bansal N, Czachor JD, Razoky H, Lipshultz SE. Lessons learned from the Pediatric Cardiomyopathy Registry (PCMR) Study Group. Cardiol Young. 2015;25 Suppl 2:140–153. doi: 10.1017/S1047951115000943 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kindel SJ, Miller EM, Gupta R, et al. Pediatric cardiomyopathy: importance of genetic and metabolic evaluation. J Card Fail. 2012;18(5):396–403. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2012.01.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hershberger RE, Givertz MM, Ho CY, et al. Genetic evaluation of cardiomyopathy: a clinical practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med. 2018;20(9):899–909. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0039-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tariq M, Ware SM. Importance of genetic evaluation and testing in pediatric cardiomyopathy. World J Cardiol. 2014;6(11):1156–1165. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i11.1156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ware SM. Genetics of paediatric cardiomyopathies. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2017;29(5):534–540. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000533 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Byers SL, Ficicioglu C. Infant with cardiomyopathy: When to suspect inborn errors of metabolism? World J Cardiol. 2014;6(11):1149–1155. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i11.1149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Herkert JC, Abbott KM, Birnie E, et al. Toward an effective exome-based genetic testing strategy in pediatric dilated cardiomyopathy. Genet Med. 2018;20(11):1374–1386. doi: 10.1038/gim.2018.9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Willig LK, Petrikin JE, Smith LD, et al. Whole-genome sequencing for identification of Mendelian disorders in critically ill infants: a retrospective analysis of diagnostic and clinical findings. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 2015;3(5):377–387. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00139-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Stark Z, Tan TY, Chong B, et al. A prospective evaluation of whole-exome sequencing as a first-tier molecular test in infants with suspected monogenic disorders. Genet Med. 2016;18(11):1090–1096. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mestek-Boukhibar L, Clement E, Jones WD, et al. Rapid Paediatric Sequencing (RaPS): comprehensive real-life workflow for rapid diagnosis of critically ill children. J Med Genet. 2018;55(11):721–728. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105396 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Meng L, Pammi M, Saronwala A, et al. Use of Exome Sequencing for Infants in Intensive Care Units: Ascertainment of Severe Single-Gene Disorders and Effect on Medical Management. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(12):e173438. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.3438 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Daoud H, Luco SM, Li R, et al. Next-generation sequencing for diagnosis of rare diseases in the neonatal intensive care unit. CMAJ. 2016;188(11):E254–E260. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.150823 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
