Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2020 Jul 7;67:109984. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109984

Anxiety persists after recovery from acquired COVID-19 in anaesthesiologists

Jing Wu a, Xiangdong Chen a, Shanglong Yao a, Renyu Liu b,
PMCID: PMC7340014  PMID: 32659378

During the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic medical providers may develop psychosocial problems, especially these who stand at the frontline battling this contagious disease [1,2]. It was reported that an Italian nurse with coronavirus committed suicide, fearing the possibility of infecting others [3]. Anaesthesiologists are the frontline medical providers taking care of COVID-19 patients in operating rooms and intensive care units, and they provide the necessary intubations for severe COVID-19 patients. They have a high risk of contracting the novel coronavirus as well as the anxiety that accompanies this. We hypothesized that anaesthesia providers who contracted COVID-19 might have a high prevalence of elevated anxiety, and that this anxiety would persist after their physical recovery. Following approval from the institutional review board of Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, we sent an inquiry to 138 anaesthesia department leaders in 138 hospitals in Hubei Province, the epicenter of COVID-19 in China, to identify anaesthesiologists who might have contracted COVID-19. Eighteen anaesthesiologists with possible hospital acquired COVID-19 from 8 hospitals were identified. A subsequent survey (Appendix A) was sent to these 18 anaesthesiologists to investigate their wellbeing, outcome, and anxiety level. According to registration information from the Anaesthesia Quality Control Center of Hubei, the number of registered anaesthesiologists in these 138 hospitals is 1427; thus, the rate of acquired COVID-19 for all anaesthesiologists is estimated to be about 1.26% (18/1427). Only one of the responding anaesthesiologists might have contracted the infection from providing service for labor and delivery. Thus, the rate of infection for anaesthesiologists related to labor and delivery service is approximately 1 out of 1427 (0.07%). Fourteen (77.8%, 14/18) valid questionnaires were received from the 18 anaesthesiologists who contracted COVID-19. The other four of those who received questionnaires were unwilling to provide information. Table 1 shows the results from the 14 respondents. Half (50.0%, 7/14) had clear connections with COVID-19 patients while the other half were unclear of the source of their infection. Three anaesthesiologists (21.4%, 3/14) had severe symptoms; the rest had mild to moderate symptoms. The average length of hospitalization was 12.1 ± 8.7 days and the course of the disease was 21.4 ± 14.4 days. Providers were out of clinical service for an average of 44.7 ± 13.5 days and were quarantined at a centralized isolation facility for an average of 16.4 ± 5.9 days. Most had a full physical recovery at the conclusion of this investigation. However, most of them (92.9%, 13/14) reported that they had mild to severe anxiety along with fear during the course of their disease, and this anxiety and fear persisted after their physical recovery. Anaesthesiologists have many opportunities to contract the disease from patients, colleagues, and from the community. Most of the anaesthesia care for labor and delivery that was identified in this study was neuraxial anaesthesia, and we identified only one anaesthesiologist who might have contracted the disease from patient care. It appears that providing anaesthesia service for labor and delivery did not have an increased risk of contracting COVID-19, as compared to providing service in other areas. The universal policy of requiring patients coming for labor and delivery wear masks during obstetric anaesthesia in Hubei province in China could have significantly reduced hospital acquired cross-infection. We recently recommended that a mask wearing policy for everyone in the hospital be mandated [4].

Table 1.

Detailed information of the anaesthesiologists who contracted COVID-19.

Characteristics
Related loss and injuries
Gender Age Initial symptom post-event (days) Diagnosis post exposure Initial symptom Type Hospital days Outcome Sick days Post-discharge isolation days Days out of clinical services Family member infection Anxiety/fear severity during sick days Anxiety/fear severity after recovery
Female 20s 3 3 Fatigue Mild 0 Full recovery 3 15 30 No Mild Mild
Female 40s 3 3 Fatigue Mild 0 Full recovery 3 15 15 No Mild Mild
Male 30s Not sure Not sure Fever, fatigue Mild 0 Full recovery 16 14 50 2 Mild None
Female 40s None 6 None Mild 6 Full recovery 8 28 45 No Mild Mild
Male 40s 18 26 Dry cough Mild 12 Full recovery 18 14 46 No Moderate Mild
Female 30s 3 10 Fever Moderate 7 Full recovery 50 32 60 No None Moderate
Femalea 40s 6 6 Fever, fatigue Moderate 12 Full recovery 10 14 48 No Mild Mild
Male 30s None 15 None Moderate 14 Full recovery 15 14 42 No Mild Mild
Male 20s Not sure Not sure Fever Moderate 17 Full recovery 30 14 59 No Mild Mild
Male 30s 1 7 Fever Moderate 18 Full recovery 26 14 50 No Moderate Mild
Male 40s 10 23 Fever, cough, fatigue Moderate 20 Recovering 20 13 33 No Mild Mild
Female 30s 5 17 Cough, fever, fatigue Severe 12 Full recovery 40 14 58 No Mild Mild
Female 30s 3 10 Fever, cough, fatigue Severe 25 Recovering 20 14 30 No Severe Severe
Male 60s Not sure Not sure Fever, fatigue Severe 26 Recovering 40 14 60 No Moderate Mild
a

The anaesthesiologist with COVID-19 after providing services for labor and delivery. The average age is 39 ± 10 with a range of 24–63. Among identified 18 cases, only 14 of them are willing to provide related information presented above.

During the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic medical providers may develop psychosocial problems, especially these who stand at the frontline battling this contagious disease [1,2]. It was reported that an Italian nurse with coronavirus committed suicide, fearing the possibility of infecting others [3]. Anaesthesiologists are the frontline medical providers taking care of COVID-19 patients in operating rooms and intensive care units, and they provide the necessary intubations for severe COVID-19 patients. They have a high risk of contracting the novel coronavirus as well as the anxiety that accompanies this. We hypothesized that anaesthesia providers who contracted COVID-19 might have a high prevalence of elevated anxiety, and that this anxiety would persist after their physical recovery. Following approval from the institutional review board of Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, we sent an inquiry to 138 anaesthesia department leaders in 138 hospitals in Hubei Province, the epicenter of COVID-19 in China, to identify anaesthesiologists who might have contracted COVID-19. Eighteen anaesthesiologists with possible hospital acquired COVID-19 from 8 hospitals were identified. A subsequent survey (Appendix A) was sent to these 18 anaesthesiologists to investigate their wellbeing, outcome, and anxiety level. According to registration information from the Anaesthesia Quality Control Center of Hubei, the number of registered anaesthesiologists in these 138 hospitals is 1427; thus, the rate of acquired COVID-19 for all anaesthesiologists is estimated to be about 1.26% (18/1427). Only one of the responding anaesthesiologists might have contracted the infection from providing service for labor and delivery. Thus, the rate of infection for anaesthesiologists related to labor and delivery service is approximately 1 out of 1427 (0.07%). Fourteen (77.8%, 14/18) valid questionnaires were received from the 18 anaesthesiologists who contracted COVID-19. The other four of those who received questionnaires were unwilling to provide information. Table 1 shows the results from the 14 respondents. Half (50.0%, 7/14) had clear connections with COVID-19 patients while the other half were unclear of the source of their infection. Three anaesthesiologists (21.4%, 3/14) had severe symptoms; the rest had mild to moderate symptoms. The average length of hospitalization was 12.1 ± 8.7 days and the course of the disease was 21.4 ± 14.4 days. Providers were out of clinical service for an average of 44.7 ± 13.5 days and were quarantined at a centralized isolation facility for an average of 16.4 ± 5.9 days. Most had a full physical recovery at the conclusion of this investigation. However, most of them (92.9%, 13/14) reported that they had mild to severe anxiety along with fear during the course of their disease, and this anxiety and fear persisted after their physical recovery. Anaesthesiologists have many opportunities to contract the disease from patients, colleagues, and from the community. Most of the anaesthesia care for labor and delivery that was identified in this study was neuraxial anaesthesia, and we identified only one anaesthesiologist who might have contracted the disease from patient care. It appears that providing anaesthesia service for labor and delivery did not have an increased risk of contracting COVID-19, as compared to providing service in other areas. The universal policy of requiring patients coming for labor and delivery wear masks during obstetric anaesthesia in Hubei province in China could have significantly reduced hospital acquired cross-infection. We recently recommended that a mask wearing policy for everyone in the hospital be mandated [4].

Despite vigorous precautions, there is still the possibility that an anaesthesiologist may contract the disease, as indicated in this report. Half of the responding anaesthesiologists were unable to recall precisely where they contracted the disease. Careful self-monitoring of potential symptoms is needed, since symptoms can occur as early as one day after providing care for COVID-19 patients. If potential contamination is suspected, proper reporting and testing must be performed, duo to the fact that some cases may show no significant symptoms. Fortunately, most of the anaesthesiologists who contracted the disease had only mild to moderate symptom, as well as a very good prognosis. However, they lost a large number of clinical service days, putting additional stress on the already overwhelmed medical system and their colleagues fighting the outbreak. Those infected by the disease should be offered proper psychological support and care. As seen in this study, all of the respondents experienced various levels of anxiety and fear both during and after the disease. Proper social and psychological support and consultation are vital.

This was a retrospective survey, so it is possible that significant bias could potentially be introduced to the results. Some people may not be willing to disclose certain sensitive information. Thus, the infection rate could potentially be under-estimated.

Strategies to prevent and manage psychological issues related to COVID-19 for anaesthesia providers can be developed using a systematic approach consisting of individual, departmental, and institutional efforts. Dr. Shanglong Yao, a senior author of this letter contracted COVID-19 at the end of January of 2020 along with two of his family members. He stayed very positive and encouraged others by sharing his perspective of the importance of a personal positive attitude in many online educational efforts, and became a great role model for those coping with anxiety at an individual level. It's important to know that there are free online resources, such as this website (https://psychhub.com/covid-19/covid-individuals/covid-individual-resources/). Based on our personal communication, there are many anaesthesia departments that have initiated various programs to help departmental members cope with anxiety by providing useful information and free access to programs to help with. As an example, one academic anaesthesia department offered free access to Headspace (https://www.headspace.com/), an App that helps people relax and practice meditation. At the University of Pennsylvania, a specific website was established to assist anyone in the community who may need help for psychological issues during the pandemic (https://www.penncobalt.com/). Anyone can sign in anonymously to seek for help for him/herself, family members, or co-workers. Available time slots of psychologists are listed for those who want to make an appointment. Individuals can connect with peers, resilience coaches, therapists, psychiatrists, and others who are ready to help.

The following is the supplementary data related to this article.

Appendix

Questionnaire about anxiety in anaesthesiologists with acquired COVID-19.

mmc1.docx (20.7KB, docx)

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109984.

Details of authors' contributions

JW and XDC: Data collection and analysis, write and edited the paper; SLY and RYL: Study design, data analysis, interpretation, and write and edited the paper.

Declaration of competing interest

We declare that we have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

We thank all hospitals and anaesthesiologists who supported this study. We thank Dr. John Grothusen at the University of Pennsylvania for their careful editing to improve the readability of this paper.

References

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Appendix

Questionnaire about anxiety in anaesthesiologists with acquired COVID-19.

mmc1.docx (20.7KB, docx)

Articles from Journal of Clinical Anesthesia are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES