Skip to main content
The American Journal of Pathology logoLink to The American Journal of Pathology
. 2020 Jul;190(7):1414–1426. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2020.03.010

Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Complex 2 Signaling Is Required for Liver Regeneration in a Cholestatic Liver Injury Murine Model

Yi Zhou ∗,, Meng Xu †,, Pin Liu ‡,§, Binyong Liang ‡,, Manning Qian ‡,, Haichuan Wang ‡,∗∗,††, Xinhua Song , Pranavanand Nyshadham ‡‡, Li Che , Diego F Calvisi §§, Feng Li ‡‡, Shumei Lin ∗,, Xin Chen ‡,∗∗
PMCID: PMC7341974  PMID: 32275903

Abstract

Cholestatic liver injury may lead to a series of hepatobiliary syndromes, which can progress to cirrhosis and impaired liver regeneration, eventually resulting in liver-related death. Mammalian target of rapamycin complex 2 (mTORC2) is a major regulator of liver metabolism and tumor development. However, the role of mTORC2 signaling in cholestatic liver injury has not been characterized to date. In this study, we generated liver-specific Rictor knockout mice to block the mTORC2 signaling pathway. Mice were treated with 3,5-diethoxycarbonyl-1,4-dihydrocollidine (DDC) to induce cholestatic liver injury. DDC feeding induced cholestatic liver injury and ductular reaction as well as activation of the mTORC2/Akt signaling pathway in wild-type mice. Loss of mTORC2 led to significantly decreased oval cell expansion after DDC feeding. Mechanistically, this phenotype was independent of mTORC1/fatty acid synthase cascade (Fasn) or yes-associated protein (Yap) signaling. Notch pathway was instead strongly inhibited during DDC-induced cholestatic liver injury in liver-specific Rictor knockout mice. Furthermore, mTORC2 deficiency in adult hepatocytes did not inhibit ductular reaction in this cholestatic live injury mouse model. Our results indicated that mTORC2 signaling effectively regulates liver regeneration by inducing oval cell proliferation. Liver progenitor cells or bile duct cells, rather than mature hepatocytes, would be the major source of ductular reaction in DDC-induced cholestatic liver injury.


Cholestatic liver disease is a serious hepatic illness resulting from impaired bile secretion by hepatocytes or intrahepatic/extrahepatic bile duct obstruction. In this disease, although the liver has a good capacity to repair, injuries to bile ducts or hepatocytes may also lead to a wide spectrum of adverse consequences, ranging from hepatic inflammation to fibrogenesis with progression to cirrhosis and hepatobiliary cancer.1,2

The pathogenesis of cholestatic liver injury is complex and not fully elucidated. In the past 25 years, multiple animal models have been established to understand the mechanisms and seek new treatment strategies for this disease.3 Among them, the 3,5-diethoxycarbonyl-1,4-dihydrocollidine (DDC)–feeding mouse is a well-established model of cholestatic liver injury. Specifically, DDC feeding leads to increased biliary porphyrin secretion and subsequently induces sclerosing cholangitis. A previous study showed that DDC feeding increases profibrotic and proinflammatory cytokine expression and activates periductal myofibroblasts around bile ducts.4 In addition, Fickert et al5 reported that DDC treatment in mice leads to the generation of intraductal pigment plugs and intense pericholangitis, as well as segmental bile duct obstruction. More important, the DDC-induced cholangiopathy is accompanied by ductular reaction and oval cell expansion. Thus, chronic DDC feeding in mice has been used as an ideal model for the study of oval cell-mediated liver regeneration.6 However, the molecular mechanisms of biliary repair and how cholestatic disease progresses are still poorly understood.

It is well known that the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway plays a significant role in liver injury and regeneration.7,8 mTOR belongs to the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase–related kinase family of protein kinases and serves as a core component of two distinct protein complexes, mTORC1 and mTORC2, which phosphorylate a different set of substrates to regulate many fundamental cell processes. mTORC1 is composed of three core components (mTOR, Raptor, and mlST8), and it plays a central role in regulating protein synthesis, nucleotide biosynthesis, lipogenesis, glycolysis, and autophagy. There are two major cascades downstream of mTORC1: eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1 (4EBP1)/eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E cascade, which regulates protein synthesis; and p70S6K/RPS6 cascade, which in turn regulates SREBP1 and fatty acid synthase (FASN) and the related de novo lipogenesis.9 Instead of Raptor, rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR (Rictor) is the core protein of mTORC2, and ablation of Rictor has been demonstrated to block mTORC2 signaling pathway.10,11 Through phosphorylating and activating several AGC subfamily kinases, including AKT, serum and glucocorticoid induced kinase (SGK), and protein kinase C, mTORC2 controls the survival and growth by regulating cell proliferation, metabolism, and the activities of the cytoskeleton.12 Among all these molecules, AKT kinases have been considered the major substrate of mTORC2.13 In a previous study, it was shown that phosphorylated (p)-AKT could be detected in samples of human primary biliary cirrhosis,14 a major type of chronic cholestatic liver disease. The results suggest the activation of mTORC2 in this pathologic condition in humans. However, the role of mTORC2 signaling in development of cholestatic liver injury and liver regeneration has not been investigated to date.

In this article, we report the generation of a mouse model with liver-specific mTORC2 knockout obtained by deletion of Rictor in the mouse liver. In these mice, we evaluated DDC-induced liver injury and oval cell expansion. The results demonstrate that loss of mTORC2 inhibits hepatic progenitor cell– or bile duct cell–mediated, but not mature hepatocyte-dependent, oval cell expansion by regulating the Akt function. Mechanistically, we found that mTORC2-modulated oval cell expansion is independent of the Rps6/Fasn cascade, while presumably being mediated by the Notch signaling pathway. Altogether, our data provide novel insights into the role of mTORC2 in regulating liver regeneration during chronic liver injury.

Materials and Methods

Reagents

Adeno-associated virus encoding Cre-recombinase under the control of hepatocyte-specific thyroxine-binding globulin promoter (AAV-TBG-Cre) and AAV-TBG-Null virus were obtained from the University of Pennsylvania Gene Therapy Core Services (Philadelphia, PA). The 0.1% DDC-supplemented diet was produced by Research Diets (New Brunswick, NJ). Rapamycin (LC Laboratories, Woburn, MA) was dissolved in 100% ethanol to make 50 mg/mL rapamycin stock, then mixed with 10% PEG400 and 10% Tween 80 to make 1 mg/mL working solution.

Animals and Treatments

FVB/N mice, Albumin-Cre transgenic mice,15 and Rictorfl/fl mice16 (all in the C57BL/6 background) were obtained from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Fasnfl/fl mice17 (in the C57BL/6 background) were kindly provided by Dr. Clay F. Semenkovich (Washington University, St. Louis, MO). Rictorfl/fl mice and Fasnfl/fl mice were crossed with Albumin-Cre to generate liver-specific Rictor knockout mice (Rictor LKO) and liver-specific Fasn knockout mice (FasnLKO mice), respectively. Genotyping was conducted using the Mouse Direct PCR Kit (catalog number B40015; Bimake, Houston, TX), according to the standard protocol. To deplete the Rictor gene specifically in adult mouse hepatocytes, Rictorfl/fl mice (aged 6 weeks) were infected with 4 × 1011 genome copies AAV-TBG-Cre vectors by tail vein injection and aged for 3 weeks to allow the complete deletion of the gene in adult hepatocytes. An AAV-TBG-Null vector was used as the control. Both male and female mice were used in the study.

DDC treatment in mice was performed as described in previous studies.18 In brief, 6- to 9-week–old mice were fed a 0.1% DDC-supplemented diet for 3 weeks. Standard diet and age- and sex-matched mice were used as controls. An additional group of mice was fed a 0.1% DDC-supplemented diet for 3 weeks, followed by 3 weeks of recovery with standard chow diet. To block the mTORC1 pathway, rapamycin was intraperitoneally injected in a dose of 6 mg/kg per day for 6 days a week and subjected to DDC diet for 3 weeks in wild-type mice. Mice were injected intraperitoneally with the vehicle (PEG400 and Tween 80) as controls. After 3 weeks of feeding, mice were euthanized. Liver weight was recorded, and the liver/body weight ratio was calculated. Blood samples and liver tissues were collected. Animal experiments were performed according to protocols approved by the Committee for Animal Research at the University of California, San Francisco (San Francisco, CA).

Biochemical Assays

The serum alanine/aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin/direct bilirubin, and albumin levels were assayed by the Clinical Laboratory of the Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital (San Francisco, CA).

Histology and Immunohistochemistry

Liver samples were fixed overnight in 10% neutral-buffered formalin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), embedded in paraffin, cut into sections (5 μm thick), and collected on glass slides. The sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, using standard procedures. For immunohistochemistry, liver sections were processed for antigen retrieval in 10 mmol/L sodium citrate buffer (microwaved, 10 minutes) after deparaffinization and rehydration. Subsequently, slides were permeabilized with 1 × phosphate-buffered saline, then blocked with 5% goat serum, followed by incubation with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. The anti–cytokeratin 19 (CK19; 52625; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-sex determining region Y box 9 (Sox9; 82630; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), anti–α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA; M0851; Agilent, Santa Clara, CA), anti-vimentin (5741; Cell Signaling Technology), anti–Ki-67 (MA5-14520; Thermo Fisher Scientific), anti-F4/80 (14-4801-82; eBioscience, San Diego, CA), and anti-YAP (4912; Cell Signaling Technology) antibodies were used. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by 20 minutes of incubation of the slides in 3% H2O2. Subsequently, slides were incubated with the biotin-conjugated secondary antibody (B2770; Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 1 hour at room temperature. Finally, the immunoreactivity was visualized using the Vectastain Elite ABC Kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and diaminobenzidine substrates (Dako North America, Carpinteria, CA). Slides were counterstained with Mayer's hematoxylin. Images were taken using a bright-field microscope connected to a digital color camera (Leica, San Francisco, CA; model DFC295). The quantification was performed using the ImageJ version 1.46r (NIH, Bethesda, MD; http://imagej.nih.gov/ij) and Image Pro Plus software version 6.0 (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, MD).

Picro Sirius Red Staining

Liver tissues were embedded in paraffin, cut into sections (5 μm thick), and collected on glass slides, which were placed in an oven at 60°C for 45 minutes. Picro Sirius Red stain solution was prepared as follows: 0.1% direct red 80 plus 0.1% fast green FCF dissolved in 1.2% picric acid. After deparaffinization and rehydration, slides were incubated with Picro Sirius Red solution for 60 minutes. Next, slides were quickly dehydrated and mounted with clean mounting medium.

Immunofluorescence Staining

Frozen liver tissues were embedded in Tissue-Tek OCT compound (Sakura, Staufen, Germany), cut into sections (5 μm thick), and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) for 10 minutes at room temperature. After washing with phosphate-buffered saline, the sections were blocked with 5% goat serum and 0.1% Triton X-100 (in phosphate-buffered saline) for 30 minutes. Next, the sections were incubated with primary antibodies [A6, epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), and CK19] overnight at 4°C. The A6 antibody was kindly supplied by Dr. Valentina M. Factor (Laboratory of Experimental Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD). The EpCAM antibody was purchased from Biolegend (118201; Biolegend, San Diego, CA), and the CK19 antibody was purchased from Abcam (52625). The following day, after washing with phosphate-buffered saline, sections were incubated with Alexa Fluor 488 and/or Alexa Fluor 594 secondary antibodies for 30 minutes in the dark. Finally, the sections were mounted with VECTASHIELDH Mounting Medium with DAPI (Vector Laboratories), and the immunofluorescence signal was visualized by an immunofluorescence microscope.

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Frozen mouse liver specimens were homogenized in Mammalian Protein Extraction Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) containing the Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The lysate was clarified by centrifugation 16,000 × g for 10 minutes at 4°C) and stored at −80°C until assayed. Protein concentrations were determined using the Bio-Rad Protein Assay Kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), and bovine serum albumin was used as standard. Aliquots of 30 μg protein lysates were denatured by boiling in Tris-Glycine SDS Sample Buffer (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY), separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Invitrogen), blocked in 5% nonfat dry milk, and incubated overnight at 4°C with the specific primary antibodies. Each primary antibody was followed by incubation with a horseradish peroxidase secondary antibody diluted 1:5000 for 1 hour and revealed with the Super Signal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Pierce Chemical Co, New York, NY). The following antibodies were used: Rictor (9476), phosphorylated (phospho)-AKT (Ser473; 3787), phospho-AKT (Ser308; 13038), total AKT (9272), phospho-Akt1 (Ser473; 9018), phospho-Akt2 (Ser474; 8599), phospho-forkhead box O1 (p-FoxO1; Ser256; 84192), phospho-proline-rich AKT substrate of 40 kDa (p-PRAS40; Thr246; 2997), phospho-mTOR (Ser2448; 2971), phospho-S6 ribosomal protein (Ser235/236; 4858), phospho-4EBP1 (Ser65; 9451), YAP/transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ) (8418), phospho-β-catenin (Ser552; 5651), FASN (3180), and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (5174) from Cell Signaling Technology. The SOX9 (ab185230), cytokeratin 19 (ab52625), and Jagged1 (ab109536) antibodies were purchased from Abcam. The Sin1 antibody (A300-910A) was purchased from Bethyl Laboratories (Montgomery, TX).

RNA Extraction and RT-qPCR

Total mRNA was extracted from liver and small intestine tissues using the Quick RNA miniprep kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA). mRNA expression was determined by quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) using the SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) in a QuantStudio 6 Flex system (Applied Biosystems). Expression of each gene was normalized to the 18S rRNA. The primer sequences are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Primer Information for RT-qPCR

Gene Forward Reverse
18S rRNA 5′-CGGCTACCACATCCAAGGAA-3′ 5′-GCTGGAATTACCGCGGCT-3′
Mouse: Hes1 5′-AAAGCCTATCATGGAGAAGAGGCG-3 5′-GGAATGCCGGGAGCTATCTTTCTT-3′
Mouse: Hes5 5′-AAGCGCCCTTGCGAGGAAAC-3′ 5′-GGTAGTTGTCGGTGAATTGGAC-3′
Mouse: HeyL 5′-CAGCCCTTCGCAGATGCAA-3′ 5′-CCAATCGTCGCAATTCAGAAAG-3′
Mouse: Jagged1 5′-CCTCGGGTCAGTTTGAGCTG-3′ 5′-CCTTGAGGCACACTTTGAAGTA-3′
Mouse: Fgf15 5′-ATGGCGAGAAAGTGGAACGG-3′ 5′-CTGACACAGACTGGGATTGCT-3′
Mouse: Fxr 5′-GGCAGAATCTGGATTTGGAATCG-3′ 5′-GCTGAACTTGAGGAAACGGG-3′
Mouse: Cyp7a1 5′-GGGATTGCTGTGGTAGTGAGC-3′ 5′-GGTATGGAATCAACCCGTTGTC-3′
Mouse: Pc 5′-CTGAAGTTCCAAACAGTTCGAGG-3′ 5′-CGCACGAAACACTCGGATG-3′
Mouse: Pck1 5′-CTGCATAACGGTCTGGACTTC-3′ 5′-CAGCAACTGCCCGTACTCC-3′
Mouse: G6pc 5′-CGACTCGCTATCTCCAAGTGA-3′ 5′-GTTGAACCAGTCTCCGACCA-3′
Mouse: Srebf1 5′-CTGGTGAGTGGAGGGACCAT-3′ 5′-GACCGGTAGCGCTTCTCAAT-3′
Mouse: Acly 5′-CAGCCAAGGCAATTTCAGAGC-3′ 5′-CTCGACGTTTGATTAACTGGTCT-3′
Mouse: Acaca 5′-ATGGGCGGAATGGTCTCTTTC-3′ 5′-TGGGGACCTTGTCTTCATCAT-3′
Mouse: Fasn 5′-GGAGGTGGTGATAGCCGGTAT-3′ 5′-TGGGTAATCCATAGAGCCCAG-3′

RT-qPCR, quantitative RT-PCR.

Bile Acid Analysis

Total bile acid levels in serum and liver lysate samples were measured using the Mouse Total Bile Acids Assay Kit (80470; Crystal Chem, Elk Grove Village, IL), following the manufacturer's protocol. The analysis was performed with the BioTek ELx808 Absorbance Reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT), and the results were shown as μmol/L. Ultra–high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry analysis was conducted to profile the taurocholic acid and deoxycholic acid levels in samples obtained from DDC fed mice. Serum (20 μL) was added to 60 μL of methanol, followed by vortexing and centrifugation at 15,000 × g for 15 minutes. Livers were weighed and homogenized in three times volume of aqueous methanol. Subsequently, 50 μL of each mixture was added to 200 μL of methanol, followed by vortexing and centrifugation at 15,000 × g for 15 minutes. Each supernatant was transferred to a sample vial for analysis. Supernatant (3 μL) was injected into an ultra–high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry instrument coupled with Q Exactive Orbitrap MS (Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with a 2.1 × 100-mm BEH C18 Column (130Å; 1.7 μm; Waters, Milford, MA) for analysis. The column temperature was maintained at 40°C. The flow rate of mobile phase was 0.3 mL/minute, with a gradient ranging from 2% to 98% aqueous acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid in a 7-minute run. Q Exactive MS was operated in negative mode with electrospray ionization. Ultrapure nitrogen was applied as the sheath (45 arbitrary units), auxiliary (10 arbitrary units), sweep (1.0 arbitrary units), and the collision gas. The capillary gas temperature was set at 275°C, and the capillary voltage was set at 3.7 kV. Mass spectrometry data were acquired from m/z 80 to 1200 Da in profile mode, and reference ions at m/z 174.9562 in the negative mode were used as a lock mass during acquisition.

Statistical Analysis

The Prism software version 6.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA) was applied to analyze the data, which are presented as means ± SEM. Comparisons between two groups were performed with the two-tailed unpaired t-test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

DDC Ingestion Leads to Cholestatic Liver Injury and Induces mTORC2/Akt Activation

As the first step to investigate mTORC2/Akt signaling in cholestatic liver injury, wild-type mice were fed a regular chow diet or a 0.1% DDC-supplemented diet (DDC diet) for 3 weeks (Figure 1A). Consistent with a previous report,19 grossly, liver from DDC fed mice appeared to be darker (Figure 1B). Histologic examination revealed that DDC feeding induced pigment plug formation in bile ducts, intrahepatic bile duct dilation, and inflammatory cell infiltration (Figure 1B). As CK19 is a widely used marker of biliary epithelial cells and oval cells,20 CK19 expression was determined in control and DDC-fed livers by immunohistochemistry. A significantly increased number of CK19-positive cells were found in DDC-fed mouse liver tissues (Figure 1, B and D). Next, the activation of the mTORC2/Akt signaling in control and DDC-fed mouse liver tissues was investigated. DDC treatment led to an increased expression of Rictor and p-AktS473, supporting the activation of mTORC2. Interestingly, the p-Akt1 isoform, but not p-Akt2, was found to be activated in this cholestatic liver injury model. Furthermore, the downstream effectors of the mTORC2/Akt cascade, including p-Pras40T246, p-mTORS2448, p-Rps6S235/236, and p-4Ebp1S65, but not p-FoxO1S256, were expressed at higher levels in DDC-treated liver tissues (Figure 1C and Supplemental Figure S1A). The results indicated that DDC feeding induces mice cholestatic liver injury and ductular reaction. These events are paralleled by the activation of mTORC2/Akt/mTORC1 signaling cascade.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

3,5-diethoxycarbonyl-1,4-dihydrocollidine (DDC) feeding leads to cholestatic liver injury and is accompanied by Akt activation. A: Scheme of the experiment. B: Gross image and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemical staining of cytokeratin 19 (CK19) proteins in the livers of Rictorfl/fl mice with or without DDC diet. C: Western blot analysis of the mTORC2/Akt signaling cascade in livers of Rictorfl/fl mice with or without DDC diet. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Gapdh) was used as loading control. At least three mice per group were assayed. D: Quantification of CK19 staining. At least three mice per group were assayed. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (D). ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. Scale bars = 100 μm (B). 4Ebp1, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein; FoxO1, forkhead box O1; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; p-, phosphorylated; Pras40, proline-rich AKT substrate of 40 kDa; Rictor, rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR; Rps6, ribosomal protein S6; t-, total.

Genetic Depletion of Rictor Impairs Oval Cell Expansion in Mice

To investigate the functional roles of mTORC2 in regulating cholestatic liver injury, liver-specific conditional Rictor gene knockout mice were generated. Specifically, the Albumin-Cre transgenic mouse that contained Cre recombinase with albumin promoter was crossed with the Rictorfl/fl mouse to restrict gene expression to liver hepatoblasts (progenitors of both biliary epithelial cells and hepatocytes).21 Genotyping was performed to validate the depletion of Rictor in mice by PCR analysis. Consistent with previous reports,21 the liver weight and liver weight/body weight ratio were slightly decreased in 6-week–old RictorLKO mice compared with Rictorfl/fl littermates (Supplemental Figure S2, A and B). This phenotype is due to the decreased glycogen and triglyceride accumulation in the liver of RictorLKO mice.21 Histologic evaluation revealed that RictorLKO mouse livers were completely normal. More important, we confirmed that bile duct development, as revealed by CK19 immunostaining, was similar in RictorLKO and Rictorfl/fl control mice (Supplemental Figure S2C). The results suggest that mTORC2/Akt signaling is not required for normal liver development, including bile duct formation.

Subsequently, RictorLKO and Rictorfl/fl control littermates were fed a DDC-supplemented diet for 3 weeks (Figure 2A). Grossly, liver tissues appeared to be darker in all DDC-fed mice (Figure 2B). To ensure that loss of mTORC2 did not affect DDC-induced liver injury in mice, the liver biomarkers in the serum of the two cohorts of mice feeding regular chow or DDC were analyzed. DDC treatment led to significantly increased serum concentration of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin, and direct bilirubin, without affecting total protein and albumin levels (Figure 3). More important, overall, similar results were obtained in both control and RictorLKO mice. In addition, taurocholic acid, deoxycholic acid, and total bile acid levels were similar in serum and liver tissues from RictorLKO and Rictorfl/fl mice (Supplemental Figure S3); and gut fibroblast growth factor 15 (Fgf15) expression levels were also similar in two mouse cohorts (Supplemental Figure S4A). These data suggest that DDC treatment is effective in inducing liver injury in both strains of mice.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Genetic Rictor ablation impairs ductular reaction. A: Scheme of the experiment. B: Gross image and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemical staining of cytokeratin 19 (CK19) and sex determining region Y-box 9 (Sox9) proteins in the livers of Rictorfl/fl and RictorLKO mice fed 3,5-diethoxycarbonyl-1,4-dihydrocollidine (DDC) diet. CE: Quantification of CK19 (C), Sox9+ ductular-like cell (D), and Sox9+ hepatocyte (E) staining. At least three mice per group were assayed. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (CE). ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. Scale bars = 100 μm (B).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Indicators of liver function in Rictorfl/fl and RictorLKO mice subjected or not to 3,5-diethoxycarbonyl-1,4-dihydrocollidine (DDC) feeding. At least three mice per group were assayed. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. ALB, albumin; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; DBIL, direct bilirubin; TBIL, total bilirubin; TP, total protein.

Next, histologic analysis of the liver tissues from DDC-fed RictorLKO mice as well as Rictorfl/fl control littermates was performed. A similar pigment plug formation in the liver tissues of the two groups of mice was detected. As described previously,18,22 in DDC-treated Rictorfl/fl mice, a population of small cells with high nucleus/cytoplasm ratio as well as an atypical duct-like morphology was observed in the periportal area of the liver. In contrast, RictorLKO mice showed few of these atypical duct-like cells at the periportal region of the liver (Figure 2B). To further investigate this phenotype, immunohistochemical staining of CK19 on liver tissues was conducted. Consistent with the histologic evaluation, CK19 (+) cells were significantly decreased in DDC-treated RictorLKO mouse liver tissues (Figure 2, B and C). Additionally, immunohistochemistry of Sox9 (Figure 2B) as well as immunofluorescence of EpCAM and the oval cell marker A6 (Figure 4, A and B) were also performed. The expression of these markers was augmented in the atypical duct-like cells in DDC-treated Rictorfl/fl mice, whereas few cells expressed these oval cell markers in DDC-treated RictorLKO mice (Figures 2, B, D, and E, and 4, A and B). Double immunofluorescence staining of CK19 and A6 showed that the two markers were co-expressed in the same set of cells in Rictorfl/fl and RictorLKO mouse liver tissues (Figure 4C).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Genetic Rictor deletion impairs epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM)+ and A6+ oval cell proliferation. A and B: Immunofluorescence staining for EpCAM (A) and A6 (B) expression in livers of Rictorfl/fl and RictorLKO mice under 3,5-diethoxycarbonyl-1,4-dihydrocollidine (DDC) diet. C: Immunofluorescence staining for cytokeratin 19 (CK19; green) costained with A6 (red). Arrowheads indicate co-expression of CK19 and A6 in oval cells. Scale bars: 50 μm (A and B); 25 μm (C).

To elucidate the mechanisms leading to the reduced oval cell expansion in RictorLKO mice, we determined whether loss of mTORC2 affects DDC-induced liver fibrosis and hepatocyte proliferation. Thus, DDC-treated Rictorfl/fl and RictorLKO mouse liver tissues were stained with Picro Sirius Red as well as anti–α-smooth muscle actin and anti-vimentin antibodies (Figure 5A). A significant expansion of Sirius Red (+), α-smooth muscle actin (+), and vimentin (+) cells in DDC-treated Rictorfl/fl and RictorLKO mouse livers was detected when compared with regular chow fed mice. Interestingly, Picro Sirius Red staining was slightly decreased and vimentin staining was significantly decreased in DDC-treated RictorLKO mouse liver tissues (Figure 5, B and C), whereas α-smooth muscle actin staining pattern was similar in Rictorfl/fl and RictorLKO mouse liver tissues (Figure 5D). In addition, there was a significant decrease of F4/80 (+) macrophages in DDC-treated RictorLKO mouse liver tissues (Supplemental Figure S5). Using immunohistochemical staining of Ki-67, the hepatocyte proliferation rate in mouse livers was quantified. No difference was detected between Rictorfl/fl and RictorLKO mice (Figure 5E). These data suggest that loss of mTORC2 does not affect DDC treatment–induced hepatocyte proliferation, but it reduces liver fibrosis and inflammation after DDC-induced liver injury.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Ablation of Rictor may affect fibrosis but not hepatocyte proliferation. A: Picro Sirius Red staining and immunohistochemistry of vimentin, α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), and Ki-67 in the livers of Rictorfl/fl and RictorLKO mice under 3,5-diethoxycarbonyl-1,4-dihydrocollidine (DDC) diet. BE: Quantification of Picro Sirius Red (B), vimentin (C), α-SMA (D), and Ki-67 (E) staining. At least three mice per group were assayed. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (BE). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗∗P < 0.001. Scale bars = 100 μm (A).

Next, Western blot analysis of liver tissues from Rictorfl/fl and RictorLKO mice on regular chow or DDC chow diet was performed. As expected, Rictor protein expression was completely lost in RictorLKO mouse liver tissues (Figure 6 and Supplemental Figure S1B). This event was accompanied by a significantly lower expression of p-AktS473, but not p-AktT308, in DDC-treated RictorLKO mouse livers (Figure 6 and Supplemental Figure S1B). Levels of mTORC1, the major downstream effector of Akt, were significantly decreased in RictorLKO livers, as demonstrated by the down-regulation of p-mTORS2448, p-4Ebp1S65, and p-Rps6S235/236 (Figure 6 and Supplemental Figure S1B). Other Akt substrates, including p-FoxO1S256 and p-Prsa40T246, did not change significantly. Consistent with the decreased ductal reaction in RictorLKO mice, the expression of biliary cell markers, such as Sox9, was decreased (Figure 6 and Supplemental Figure S1B).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Ablation of Rictor reduces Akt signaling activation. Western blot analysis of the mTORC2/Akt signaling cascade in livers of Rictorfl/fl and RictorLKO mice under 3,5-diethoxycarbonyl-1,4-dihydrocollidine (DDC) diet. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Gapdh) was used as loading control. 4Ebp1, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1; CK19, cytokeratin 19; FoxO1, forkhead box O1; KO, knockout; mSin1, mitogen-activated protein kinase associated protein 1; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; p-, phosphorylated; Pras40, proline-rich AKT substrate of 40 kDa; Rictor, rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR; Rps6, ribosomal protein S6; Sox9, SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 9; t-, total.

Finally, to further investigate how the loss of mTORC2 influences liver injury and regeneration, mice were fed the DDC diet for 3 weeks and switched to regular mouse chow for additional 3 weeks to allow the mice to recover from DDC-induced liver injury. A significant decrease of CK19 (+) cells after 3 weeks of recovery in both Rictorfl/fl and RictorLKO mice was observed (Supplemental Figure S6).

In summary, DDC treatment triggers cholestatic liver injury in both Rictorfl/fl and RictorLKO mice. However, loss of mTORC2 leads to reduced DDC-driven Akt activation and decreases oval cell expansion in vivo.

mTORC2 from Progenitor or Biliary Epithelial Cells Drives Oval Cell Expansion in Vivo

Albumin-Cre mice are responsible for the deletion of the floxed gene in liver hepatoblasts, leading to gene knockout in both hepatocytes and biliary epithelial cells in adult mice.23 To further investigate the cellular population affected by mTORC2 deficiency during ductular reaction, we specifically deleted Rictor in adult hepatocytes. In brief, Rictorfl/fl mice were infected with AAV-TBG-Cre. Rictorfl/fl littermates infected with AAV-TBG-Null vector were used as controls (Figure 7A). Three weeks after AAV injection, mice were fed a DDC diet for additional 3 weeks. A significant similar degree of ductular reaction could be observed in DDC-treated AAV-TBG-Null and AAV-TBG-Cre injected Rictorfl/fl mice (Figure 7B). Immunohistochemical staining of CK19 or A6 was performed to quantify the oval cell expansion in mice, and similar staining patterns for CK19 or A6 were obtained in the two mouse cohorts (Figure 7, B and C, and Supplemental Figure S7). Interestingly, Sox9 staining revealed similar levels of Sox9 (+) cells in periportal ductal-like cells. However, although numerous hepatocytes were found to be Sox9 (+) surrounding the periportal region, the number of Sox9 (+) hepatocytes was significantly lower in DDC-treated AAV-TBG-Cre injected Rictorfl/fl mice (Figure 7, D and E). The results suggest that hepatocyte mTORC2 controls Sox9 expression in hepatocytes, but not in oval cells. Western blot analysis revealed that AAV-TBG-Cre was effective in deleting Rictor in the adult liver, leading to decreased expression of p-AktS473, p-Rps6235/236, and p-mTORS2448 in these mice (Figure 7F and Supplemental Figure S1C).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Rictor deficiency in hepatocytes has no effect on ductular reaction. A: Scheme of the experiment. B: Gross image and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemical staining of cytokeratin 19 (CK19) and sex-determining region Y-box 9 (Sox9) in the livers of AAV-Cre-Rictor and AAV-Null mice under 3,5-diethoxycarbonyl-1,4-dihydrocollidine (DDC) diet. Arrowheads indicate Sox9+ hepatocytes. CE: Quantification of CK19+ cells (C), Sox9+ ductular-like cells (D), and Sox9+ hepatocytes (E). F: Western blot analysis of mTORC2/Akt signaling cascade in AAV-Cre-Rictor and AAV-Null mouse liver under DDC diet. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Gapdh) was used as loading control. At least three mice per group were assayed. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (CE). ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. Scale bars = 100 μm (B). 4Ebp1, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein; FoxO1, forkhead box O1; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; p-, phosphorylated; Pras40, proline-rich AKT substrate of 40 kDa; Rictor, rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR; Rps6, ribosomal protein S6; t-, total.

Altogether, these findings suggest that liver progenitor cells or biliary epithelial cells, rather than hepatocytes, are the main cells types required for mTORC2 activation along ductular reaction in DDC-induced cholestatic liver injury.

The mTORC1/Fasn Signaling Is Dispensable in DDC-Induced Ductular Reaction

Because mTORC1 is the major signaling event downstream of the mTORC2/Akt cascade and p-mTORS2448 levels were significantly decreased in DDC-treated RictorLKO mice, we hypothesized that mTORC1 inhibition may also lead to decreased ductular reaction. To test this hypothesis, wild-type mice were subjected to daily rapamycin injection and DDC treatment (Supplemental Figure S8A). Additional mice were treated with vehicle and DDC as control. After 2 weeks of DDC treatment, similar oval cell expansion in vehicle and rapamycin-treated mice occurred (Supplemental Figure S8B). This observation was confirmed by CK19 immunohistochemistry (Supplemental Figure S8C). At the molecular level, as expected, rapamycin treatment effectively inhibited the levels of p-Rps6, the downstream effector of mTORC1 (Supplemental Figure S8D).

FASN-regulated de novo lipid biosynthesis is a major metabolic cascade downstream of mTORC1/Rps6.24 To test whether the lipogenic pathway is also dispensable for DDC-induced ductular reaction, liver-specific Fasn knockout (FasnLKO) mice were generated by crossing Albumin-Cre mice with Fasnfl/fl mice, as described in our previous publication (Supplemental Figure S9A).25 Thus, FasnLKO and control Fasnfl/fl mice were fed DDC for 3 weeks. FasnLKO and Fasnfl/fl mice displayed a similar oval cell expansion pattern, as assessed by histopathologic analysis and CK19 immunohistochemistry (Supplemental Figure S9, B and C). Western blot analysis confirmed the effective deletion of Fasn in the mouse liver (Supplemental Figure S9D).

In summary, our study indicates that the mTORC2/Akt pathway regulates DDC-induced ductular reaction independent of the mTORC1/Rps6/Fasn cascade.

Aberrant Notch but Not Yap Activation in DDC-Treated RictorLKO Mice

Finally, we investigated the possible pathways downstream of mTORC2 in regulating oval cell expansion in response to DDC treatment. As altered bile acid synthesis, gluconeogenesis, and lipogenesis have been shown to be the major metabolic pathways downstream of mTORC2 in the liver, the expression of genes involved in these pathways in DDC-treated Rictorfl/fl and RictorLKO mouse liver tissues by quantitative real-time RT-PCR were analyzed. All these genes exhibited similar expression levels in the two cohorts of mice (Supplemental Figure S4, B–D), suggesting that these metabolic processes are not the major events downstream of mTORC2 during DDC-induced liver injury. A recent investigation indicates that the Hippo/Yap cascade is involved in DDC-induced oval cell expansion.26 Additional studies suggest that Yap is a downstream effector of mTORC2.27,28 Thus, we investigated whether DDC-treated control and RictorLKO mouse liver tissues were characterized by activation of Yap by immunohistochemistry. Enhanced cytoplasmic and nuclear Yap expression was found in oval cells from DDC-treated control Rictorfl/fl mouse livers. A similar Yap expression pattern characterized DDC-treated RictorLKO mouse liver tissues (Supplemental Figure S10A). Furthermore, no difference in the total levels of either Yap or its paralog Taz was detected in the two mouse cohorts by Western blot analysis (Supplemental Figure S10B).

Notch signaling cascade is another pathway that has been implicated in oval cell expansion.29 We examined Notch pathway status in DDC-treated Rictorfl/fl and RictorLKO mouse liver tissues. Intriguingly, a significant decrease in Jag1 protein expression was observed in DDC-treated RictorLKO mouse liver tissues (Supplemental Figure S10B). Consistently, quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis confirmed the decreased mRNA expression of canonical Notch targets, such as Hes1, Hes5, and HeyL1, in DDC-treated RictorLKO mouse livers (Supplemental Figure S10C).

Altogether, these results indicate loss of mTORC2 does not affect Hippo/Yap cascade, whereas it inhibits the Notch pathway, along DDC-induced ductular reaction.

Discussion

Recent studies have established mTOR complexes as essential modulator of numerous cellular processes, including cell metabolism and growth. mTOR functions in two distinct complexes: mTORC1, which is sensitive to rapamycin treatment; and mTORC2, which is insensitive to rapamycin. Although the role of mTORC1 in liver homeostasis, regeneration, and tumor development has been extensively investigated, the studies about mTORC2 in liver biology remain limited. As Rictor is a unique subunit of mTORC2, conditional Rictor knockout mice have been used to characterize the function of mTORC2 in various cell types. In the liver, studies on mTORC2 mainly focus on its role in hepatic metabolism and carcinogenesis. For instance, it was found that hepatic mTORC2 deletion leads to loss of p-AktS473. This resulted in reduced activity of glucokinase and sterol regulatory element binding transcription factor 1 (Srebp1) proteins, leading to impaired glycolysis and lipogenesis in RictorLKO mice.21 In agreement with the latter findings, RictorLKO mice failed to develop a fatty liver phenotype when fed a high-fat diet.30 In addition, RictorLKO mice exhibited alterations in insulin-induced Akt activation and insulin-driven mTORC1 activation, leading to glucose intolerance and insulin resistance.21 In human hepatocellular carcinoma, chromosomal gains of RICTOR were found in approximately 25% of patient samples,31 and high expression of RICTOR was associated with poor prognosis.32 In addition, inhibition of mTORC2 induced cell cycle arrest in hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines.33 Furthermore, loss of Rictor prevented sgPten/c-Met34 and c-Myc/MCL132 induced hepatocellular carcinoma formation in mice. Taken together, these findings revealed the key role of mTORC2 in the regulation of liver metabolism and carcinogenesis. However, the functional contribution of mTORC2 to liver regeneration has not been reported to date. In this article, we investigated how mTORC2 regulates liver regeneration after DDC-induced cholestatic liver injury using RictorLKO mice. We discovered that mTORC2/Akt signaling cascade is activated after DDC treatment in wild-type mice. More important, we found that loss of mTORC2 did not prevent DDC-induced cholestatic liver injury, as similar serologic features, including increased levels of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, taurocholic acid, deoxycholic acid, and total bile acid, were observed in both control and RictorLKO mice. Although we were unable to measure bile flow rates in the DDC-treated mouse cohort, in a previous study, it was shown that DDC treatment does not alter bile flow rate in mice.35 It is well established that oval cell expansion is a major phenotype in the DDC-induced cholestatic liver injury model. We found that liver-specific ablation of Rictor significantly inhibited oval cell expansion in DDC fed mice, supporting a major function of the mTORC2 signaling cascade in this process. The present studies focus on DDC-induced cholestasis, but additional models,36 such as bile duct ligation model and Mdr2−/− mouse model, in combination with RictorLKO mice, should be applied. These studies will provide additional support for the role of mTORC2 in cholestatic disease pathogenesis.

mTORC2 phosphorylates several AGC kinases, such as AKT proteins (AKT1, AKT2, and AKT3), SGKs (SGK1, SGK2, and SGK3), and protein kinase C, leading to the activation of these kinases. Among these mTORC2 substrates, AKT kinases are considered the major downstream effectors of mTORC2. In the mouse liver, only Akt1 and Akt2, but not Akt3, are expressed. Between Akt1 and Akt2, it has been estimated that Akt2 represents approximately 85% of total Akt in the liver. Previous studies have shown that different Akt isoforms may have distinct roles in biological processes. For instance, Akt2 has been identified as the main Akt isoform downstream of insulin signaling in the liver,37,38 and it is required for loss of phosphatase and tensin homolog (Pten)-induced hepatic steatosis.39 Overexpression of constitutively activated Akt2 in RictorLKO mice rescued the metabolic defects observed in RictorLKO mice.21 Akt2 is also required for activated mutant form of PIK3CA or loss of Pten driven hepatocellular carcinoma formation in mice.40,41 The role of Akt1 in the liver has been only partially characterized.42 Recently, it was found that Akt1, but not Akt2, is the dominant Akt isoform in c-MYC driven liver carcinogenesis.32 On the other hand, it has been suggested that Akt1 and Akt2 have redundant roles in liver homeostasis, and concomitant deletion of Atk1 and Akt2 is required to disrupt such equilibrium.43 Our current study suggests that Akt1 may be the principal Akt isoform required for oval cell expansion. This hypothesis could be tested via generation of liver-specific Akt1, Akt2, and Akt1/Akt2 double-knockout mice and subjecting them to DDC feeding.

To further investigate the molecular mechanisms whereby the mTORC2/Akt pathway modulates DDC-induced cholestatic liver injury, we analyzed the expression of downstream signaling molecules in DDC-treated control and RictorLKO mice. We discovered a significant decreased expression of p-mTOR, p-Rps6, and p-4Ebp1 proteins, suggesting a decrease in the mTORC1 activity. In contrast, other known mTORC2/Akt substrates, including p-Pras40T246 and p-FoxO1S256, were not affected by the loss of Rictor. These data suggest that mTORC1 may be the key signaling complex downstream of mTORC2/Akt1 in cholestatic liver injury. Interestingly, using rapamycin treatment and liver-specific Fasn knockout mice, we demonstrate that Rps6/Fasn signaling cascade is dispensable for DDC-induced oval cell expansion. Rapamycin treatment inhibits p-Rps6 downstream of mTORC1, but not p-4Ebp1.44 Thus, it is possible that 4Ebp1/eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E–mediated translation is the major signaling event downstream of mTORC2/Akt during cholestatic liver injury. Recent studies have demonstrated the key roles of Hippo and Notch cascades in oval cell expansion.26, 27, 28, 29 Our investigation shows that the Notch cascade, but not the Hippo signaling, is down-regulated in DDC-treated RictorLKO mouse liver tissues. More important, Jag1, the predominant Notch ligand in the liver, was expressed at lower levels in DDC-treated RictorLKO livers. Further analysis suggested that Jag1 mRNA levels were equivalent in DDC-treated control and RictorLKO liver tissues (Supplemental Figure S10C), indicating that Jag1 is regulated at the post-transcriptional level by mTORC2. Overall, it is tempting to hypothesize that mTORC2/Akt regulates 4Ebp1/eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E downstream of mTORC1, leading to the increased protein synthesis of Jag1, elevated Notch signaling, and, eventually, oval cell expansion after DDC treatment. Clearly, additional studies are required to investigate this hypothesis. The results from these studies will provide novel mechanistic insights into how mTORC2/Akt and Notch signaling cascades interact during cholestatic liver injury–induced oval cell expansion.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Clay F. Semenkovich (Washington University, St. Louis, MO) for providing Fasnfl/fl mice; and Dr. Valentina M. Factor (Laboratory of Experimental Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Institute, NIH) for the A6 antibody used in the study.

Footnotes

Y.Z. and M.X. contributed equally to this work.

Supported by NIH grants R01CA239251 (X.C.), R01DK121970 (F.L.), and P30DK026743 (University of California, San Francisco, Liver Center); National Natural Science Foundation of China grant 81902449 (M.X.); and China Scholarship Council scholarship contract number 201806280217 (Y.Z.).

Disclosures: None declared.

Supplemental material for this article can be found at http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2020.03.010.

Contributor Information

Shumei Lin, Email: lsmxjtu@126.com.

Xin Chen, Email: xin.chen@ucsf.edu.

Supplemental Data

Supplemental Figure S1.

Supplemental Figure S1

Semiquantification of the Western blot analysis. Relative protein expression in liver tissues of Rictorfl/fl mice under standard diet or DDC diet (A); Rictorfl/fl mice and RictorLKO mice with DDC treatment (B); and AAV-Cre-Rictor and AAV-Null mice under DDC diet (C). At least three mice in each group were assayed. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (AC). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. p-, phosphorylated; t-, total. 4Ebp1, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1; CK19, cytokeratin 19; FoxO1, forkhead box O1; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; mSin1, mitogen-activated protein kinase associated protein 1; p-, phosphorylated; Pras40, proline-rich AKT substrate of 40 kDa; Rictor, rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR; Rps6, ribosomal protein S6; Sox9, SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 9; t-, total.

Supplemental Figure S2.

Supplemental Figure S2

Rictor deficiency does not affect quantity of cytokeratin (CK19)–positive cells but decreases the liver weight on baseline. A and B: The liver weight (A) and liver weight/body weight ratio (B) of Rictorfl/fl mice and RictorLKO mice with normal diet. C: Gross image (top row) and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E; middle row) and immunohistochemical staining of CK19 (bottom row) on livers of Rictorfl/fl mice and RictorLKO mice with normal diet. At least three mice in each group were assayed. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (A and B). ∗P < 0.05. Scale bars = 100 μm (C, middle and bottom rows).

Supplemental Figure S3.

Supplemental Figure S3

RictorLKO and Rictorfl/fl mice have similar levels of taurocholic acid (TCA), deoxycholic acid (DCA), and total bile acid (TBA). TCA, DCA, and TBA levels were measured in serum and liver tissues from Rictorfl/fl mice and RictorLKO mice under DDC diet. At least three mice in each group were assayed. Data are expressed as means ± SEM.

Supplemental Figure S4.

Supplemental Figure S4

Bile acid synthesis, gluconeogenesis, and lipogenesis pathways are not the major mTORC2 targets in this DDC-induced injury model. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis of genes involved in gut Fgf15 (A), bile acid synthesis (B), gluconeogenesis (C), and lipogenesis (D) in DDC-treated Rictorfl/fl and RictorLKO mouse liver tissues. At least three mice in each group were assayed. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (AD). ∗∗P < 0.01. Fasn, fatty acid synthase. Acaca, acetyl-CoA carboxylase alpha; Acly, ATP citrate lyase; Cyp7a1, cytochrome P450 family 7 subfamily A member 1; Fasn, fatty acid synthase; Fgf15, fibroblast growth factor 15; Fxr, farnesoid X receptor; G6pc, glucose-6-phosphatase catalytic subunit; Pc, Pyruvate carboxylase; Pck1, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1; Srebf1, sterol regulatory element binding transcription factor 1.

Supplemental Figure S5.

Supplemental Figure S5

Inhibition of mTORC2 reduces inflammatory responses in this cholestatic liver injury mouse model. A: Immunohistochemical staining of F4/80 on livers of Rictorfl/fl mice and RictorLKO mice with DDC diet. B: Quantification of F4/80 staining. At least three mice in each group were assayed. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (B). ∗∗∗P < 0.001. Scale bars = 100 μm (A).

Supplemental Figure S6.

Supplemental Figure S6

Oval cell expansion is decreased after 3 weeks of recovery. A: Gross image and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemistry staining of cytokeratin 19 (CK19) on livers of Rictorfl/fl mice and RictorLKO mice with 3 weeks of recovery after DDC diet. A: Gross image (top row) and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E; middle row) and immunohistochemistry staining of cytokeratin 19 (CK19; bottom row) on livers of Rictorfl/fl mice and RictorLKO mice with 3 weeks of recovery after DDC diet. B: Quantification of CK19 staining on livers of Rictorfl/fl mice and RictorLKO mice before and after 3 weeks of recovery. At least three mice in each group were assayed. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (B). ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. Scale bars = 100 μm (A).

Supplemental Figure S7.

Supplemental Figure S7

Rictor deficiency in hepatocytes has no effect on A6+ oval cell proliferation. A: Immunofluorescence staining for A6 expression in livers of AAV-Cre-Rictor and AAV-Null mice under DDC diet. B: Quantification of A6 staining. At least three mice in each group were assayed. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (B). Scale bars = 50 μm (A).

Supplemental Figure S8.

Supplemental Figure S8

mTORC1 signaling is dispensable in DDC-induced ductular reaction. A: Scheme of the experiment. B: Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemistry staining of cytokeratin 19 (CK19) on livers of rapamycin- and vehicle-treated mice with DDC diet. C: Quantification of CK19 staining. D: Western blot analysis of relative protein expression in liver tissues. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Gapdh) was used as loading control. At least three mice in each group were assayed. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (C). Scale bars = 100 μm (B). 4Ebp1, 4E-binding protein 1; p-, phosphorylated; t-, total. 4Ebp1, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; p-, phosphorylated; Rps6, ribosomal protein S6; t-, total.

Supplemental Figure S9.

Supplemental Figure S9

Fatty acid synthase (Fasn) signaling is dispensable in DDC-induced ductular reaction. A: Scheme of the experiment. B: Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and cytokeratin 19 (CK19) immunohistochemistry staining of CK19 on livers of Fasnfl/fl mice and FasnLKO mice with DDC diet. C: Quantification of CK19 staining. D: Western blot analysis of relative protein expression in liver tissues. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Gapdh) was used as loading control. At least three mice in each group were assayed. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (C). Scale bars = 100 μm (B). KO, knockout; Rps6, ribosomal protein S6; p-, phosphorylated; WT, wild type.

Supplemental Figure S10.

Supplemental Figure S10

Aberrant Notch but not Yap activation in DDC-treated RictorLKO mice. A: Immunohistochemical staining of Yap on livers of Rictorfl/fl mice and RictorLKO mice with DDC diet. B: Western blot analysis of relative protein expression in liver tissues. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Gapdh) was used as loading control. C: Quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis of liver tissues from Rictorfl/fl and RictorLKO mice with DDC diet. At least three mice in each group were assayed. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (C). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01. Scale bars = 100 μm (A). KO, knockout; p-, phosphorylated. Hes1, hes family bHLH transcription factor 1; Hes5, hes family bHLH transcription factor 5; HeyL, hairy/enhancer-of-split related with YRPW moti-like; KO, knockout; p-, phosphorylated; Taz, transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif.

References

  • 1.Hirschfield G.M., Heathcote E.J., Gershwin M.E. Pathogenesis of cholestatic liver disease and therapeutic approaches. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:1481–1496. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.European Association for the Study of the Liver EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of cholestatic liver diseases. J Hepatol. 2009;51:237–267. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mariotti V., Strazzabosco M., Fabris L., Calvisi D.F. Animal models of biliary injury and altered bile acid metabolism. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2018;1864:1254–1261. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2017.06.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fickert P., Thueringer A., Moustafa T., Silbert D., Gumhold J., Tsybrovskyy O., Lebofsky M., Jaeschke H., Denk H., Trauner M. The role of osteopontin and tumor necrosis factor alpha receptor-1 in xenobiotic-induced cholangitis and biliary fibrosis in mice, laboratory investigation. J Tech Methods Pathol. 2010;90:844–852. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2010.61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fickert P., Stoger U., Fuchsbichler A., Moustafa T., Marschall H.U., Weiglein A.H., Tsybrovskyy O., Jaeschke H., Zatloukal K., Denk H., Trauner M. A new xenobiotic-induced mouse model of sclerosing cholangitis and biliary fibrosis. Am J Pathol. 2007;171:525–536. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.061133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jakubowski A., Ambrose C., Parr M., Lincecum J.M., Wang M.Z., Zheng T.S., Browning B., Michaelson J.S., Baetscher M., Wang B., Bissell D.M., Burkly L.C. TWEAK induces liver progenitor cell proliferation. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:2330–2340. doi: 10.1172/JCI23486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Li Z., Zhang J., Mulholland M., Zhang W. mTOR activation protects liver from ischemia/reperfusion-induced injury through NF-kappaB pathway. FASEB J. 2017;31:3018–3026. doi: 10.1096/fj.201601278R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Panasyuk G., Patitucci C., Espeillac C., Pende M. The role of the mTOR pathway during liver regeneration and tumorigenesis. Ann Endocrinol. 2013;74:121–122. doi: 10.1016/j.ando.2013.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Saxton R.A., Sabatini D.M. mTOR signaling in growth, metabolism, and disease. Cell. 2017;168:960–976. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li J., Xu Z., Jiang L., Mao J., Zeng Z., Fang L., He W., Yuan W., Yang J., Dai C. Rictor/mTORC2 protects against cisplatin-induced tubular cell death and acute kidney injury. Kidney Int. 2014;86:86–102. doi: 10.1038/ki.2013.559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hallowell R.W., Collins S.L., Craig J.M., Zhang Y., Oh M., Illei P.B., Chan-Li Y., Vigeland C.L., Mitzner W., Scott A.L., Powell J.D., Horton M.R. mTORC2 signalling regulates M2 macrophage differentiation in response to helminth infection and adaptive thermogenesis. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14208. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Laplante M., Sabatini D.M. mTOR signaling in growth control and disease. Cell. 2012;149:274–293. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sarbassov D.D., Ali S.M., Sabatini D.M. Growing roles for the mTOR pathway. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2005;17:596–603. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2005.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Onori P., Alvaro D., Floreani A.R., Mancino M.G., Franchitto A., Guido M., Carpino G., De Santis A., Angelico M., Attili A.F., Gaudio E. Activation of the IGF1 system characterizes cholangiocyte survival during progression of primary biliary cirrhosis. J Histochem Cytochem. 2007;55:327–334. doi: 10.1369/jhc.6R7125.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Postic C., Shiota M., Niswender K.D., Jetton T.L., Chen Y., Moates J.M., Shelton K.D., Lindner J., Cherrington A.D., Magnuson M.A. Dual roles for glucokinase in glucose homeostasis as determined by liver and pancreatic beta cell-specific gene knock-outs using Cre recombinase. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:305–315. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.1.305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tang F., Wu Q., Ikenoue T., Guan K.L., Liu Y., Zheng P. A critical role for Rictor in T lymphopoiesis. J Immunol. 2012;189:1850–1857. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chakravarthy M.V., Zhu Y., Lopez M., Yin L., Wozniak D.F., Coleman T., Hu Z., Wolfgang M., Vidal-Puig A., Lane M.D., Semenkovich C.F. Brain fatty acid synthase activates PPARalpha to maintain energy homeostasis. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:2539–2552. doi: 10.1172/JCI31183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fan L., Xu C., Wang C., Tao J., Ho C., Jiang L., Gui B., Huang S., Evert M., Calvisi D.F., Chen X. Bmi1 is required for hepatic progenitor cell expansion and liver tumor development. PLoS One. 2012;7:e46472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nantasanti S., Toussaint M.J., Youssef S.A., Tooten P.C., de Bruin A. Rb and p53 liver functions are essential for xenobiotic metabolism and tumor suppression. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0150064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tirnitz-Parker J.E., Tonkin J.N., Knight B., Olynyk J.K., Yeoh G.C. Isolation, culture and immortalisation of hepatic oval cells from adult mice fed a choline-deficient, ethionine-supplemented diet. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2007;39:2226–2239. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2007.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hagiwara A., Cornu M., Cybulski N., Polak P., Betz C., Trapani F., Terracciano L., Heim M.H., Ruegg M.A., Hall M.N. Hepatic mTORC2 activates glycolysis and lipogenesis through Akt, glucokinase, and SREBP1c. Cell Metab. 2012;15:725–738. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wang X., Foster M., Al-Dhalimy M., Lagasse E., Finegold M., Grompe M. The origin and liver repopulating capacity of murine oval cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100 Suppl 1:11881–11888. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1734199100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lemaigre F.P. Determining the fate of hepatic cells by lineage tracing: facts and pitfalls. Hepatology. 2015;61:2100–2103. doi: 10.1002/hep.27659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bruning U., Morales-Rodriguez F., Kalucka J., Goveia J., Taverna F., Queiroz K.C.S., Dubois C., Cantelmo A.R., Chen R., Loroch S., Timmerman E., Caixeta V., Bloch K., Conradi L.C., Treps L., Staes A., Gevaert K., Tee A., Dewerchin M., Semenkovich C.F., Impens F., Schilling B., Verdin E., Swinnen J.V., Meier J.L., Kulkarni R.A., Sickmann A., Ghesquiere B., Schoonjans L., Li X., Mazzone M., Carmeliet P. Impairment of angiogenesis by fatty acid synthase inhibition involves mTOR malonylation. Cell Metab. 2018;28:866–880.e815. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.07.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Che L., Chi W., Qiao Y., Zhang J., Song X., Liu Y., Li L., Jia J., Pilo M.G., Wang J., Cigliano A., Ma Z., Kuang W., Tang Z., Zhang Z., Shui G., Ribback S., Dombrowski F., Evert M., Pascale R.M., Cossu C., Pes G.M., Osborne T.F., Calvisi D.F., Chen X., Chen L. Cholesterol biosynthesis supports the growth of hepatocarcinoma lesions depleted of fatty acid synthase in mice and humans. Gut. 2020;69:177–186. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Planas-Paz L., Sun T., Pikiolek M., Cochran N.R., Bergling S., Orsini V. YAP, but not RSPO-LGR4/5, signaling in biliary epithelial cells promotes a ductular reaction in response to liver injury. Cell Stem Cell. 2019;25:39–53.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2019.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Artinian N., Cloninger C., Holmes B., Benavides-Serrato A., Bashir T., Gera J. Phosphorylation of the hippo pathway component AMOTL2 by the mTORC2 kinase promotes YAP signaling, resulting in enhanced glioblastoma growth and invasiveness. J Biol Chem. 2015;290:19387–19401. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.656587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gui Y., Li J., Lu Q., Feng Y., Wang M., He W., Yang J., Dai C. Yap/Taz mediates mTORC2-stimulated fibroblast activation and kidney fibrosis. J Biol Chem. 2018;293:16364–16375. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.004073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Spee B., Carpino G., Schotanus B.A., Katoonizadeh A., Vander Borght S., Gaudio E., Roskams T. Characterisation of the liver progenitor cell niche in liver diseases: potential involvement of Wnt and Notch signalling. Gut. 2010;59:247–257. doi: 10.1136/gut.2009.188367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yuan M., Pino E., Wu L., Kacergis M., Soukas A.A. Identification of Akt-independent regulation of hepatic lipogenesis by mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) complex 2. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:29579–29588. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.386854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Villanueva A., Chiang D.Y., Newell P., Peix J., Thung S., Alsinet C., Tovar V., Roayaie S., Minguez B., Sole M., Battiston C., Van Laarhoven S., Fiel M.I., Di Feo A., Hoshida Y., Yea S., Toffanin S., Ramos A., Martignetti J.A., Mazzaferro V., Bruix J., Waxman S., Schwartz M., Meyerson M., Friedman S.L., Llovet J.M. Pivotal role of mTOR signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:1972–1983.e11. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.08.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Xu Z., Xu M., Liu P., Zhang S., Shang R., Qiao Y., Che L., Ribback S., Cigliano A., Evert K., Pascale R.M., Dombrowski F., Evert M., Chen X., Calvisi D.F. The mTORC2-Akt1 cascade is crucial for c-Myc to promote hepatocarcinogenesis in mice and humans. Hepatology. 2019;70:1600–1613. doi: 10.1002/hep.30697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chen B.W., Chen W., Liang H., Liu H., Liang C., Zhi X., Hu L.Q., Yu X.Z., Wei T., Ma T., Xue F., Zheng L., Zhao B., Feng X.H., Bai X.L., Liang T.B. Inhibition of mTORC2 induces cell-cycle arrest and enhances the cytotoxicity of doxorubicin by suppressing MDR1 expression in HCC cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2015;14:1805–1815. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Xu Z., Hu J., Cao H., Pilo M.G., Cigliano A., Shao Z., Xu M., Ribback S., Dombrowski F., Calvisi D.F., Chen X. Loss of Pten synergizes with c-Met to promote hepatocellular carcinoma development via mTORC2 pathway. Exp Mol Med. 2018;50:e417. doi: 10.1038/emm.2017.158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Soltis E.E., Newman P.S. Age-dependent salt-induced hypertension in the rat: prevention with DSP-4, a selective noradrenergic neurotoxin. Clin Exp Hypertens A. 1991;13:557–572. doi: 10.3109/10641969109045069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pollheimer M.J., Fickert P. Animal models in primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2015;48:207–217. doi: 10.1007/s12016-014-8442-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cho H., Mu J., Kim J.K., Thorvaldsen J.L., Chu Q., Crenshaw E.B., 3rd, Kaestner K.H., Bartolomei M.S., Shulman G.I., Birnbaum M.J. Insulin resistance and a diabetes mellitus-like syndrome in mice lacking the protein kinase Akt2 (PKB beta) Science. 2001;292:1728–1731. doi: 10.1126/science.292.5522.1728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Leavens K.F., Easton R.M., Shulman G.I., Previs S.F., Birnbaum M.J. Akt2 is required for hepatic lipid accumulation in models of insulin resistance. Cell Metab. 2009;10:405–418. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2009.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.He L., Hou X., Kanel G., Zeng N., Galicia V., Wang Y., Yang J., Wu H., Birnbaum M.J., Stiles B.L. The critical role of AKT2 in hepatic steatosis induced by PTEN loss. Am J Pathol. 2010;176:2302–2308. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wang C., Che L., Hu J., Zhang S., Jiang L., Latte G., Demartis M.I., Tao J., Gui B., Pilo M.G., Ribback S., Dombrowski F., Evert M., Calvisi D.F., Chen X. Activated mutant forms of PIK3CA cooperate with RasV12 or c-Met to induce liver tumour formation in mice via AKT2/mTORC1 cascade. Liver Int. 2016;36:1176–1186. doi: 10.1111/liv.13055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Galicia V.A., He L., Dang H., Kanel G., Vendryes C., French B.A., Zeng N., Bayan J.A., Ding W., Wang K.S., French S., Birnbaum M.J., Rountree C.B., Stiles B.L. Expansion of hepatic tumor progenitor cells in Pten-null mice requires liver injury and is reversed by loss of AKT2. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:2170–2182. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Fan B., Yu Y., Zhang Y. PI3K-Akt1 expression and its significance in liver tissues with chronic fluorosis. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8:1226–1236. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wang Q., Yu W.N., Chen X., Peng X.D., Jeon S.M., Birnbaum M.J., Guzman G., Hay N. Spontaneous hepatocellular carcinoma after the combined deletion of Akt isoforms. Cancer Cell. 2016;29:523–535. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.02.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Choo A.Y., Yoon S.O., Kim S.G., Roux P.P., Blenis J. Rapamycin differentially inhibits S6Ks and 4E-BP1 to mediate cell-type-specific repression of mRNA translation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:17414–17419. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809136105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The American Journal of Pathology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Investigative Pathology

RESOURCES