Abstract
In the cell, proteins fold and perform complex functions through global structural rearrangements. Function requires a protein to be at the brink of stability to be susceptible to small environmental fluctuations, yet stable enough to maintain structural integrity. These apparently conflicting behaviors are exhibited by systems near a critical point, where distinct phases merge—a concept beyond previous studies indicating proteins have a well-defined folded/unfolded phase boundary in the pressure-temperature plane. Here, by modeling the protein phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) on the temperature (T), pressure (P), and crowding volume-fraction (ϕ) phase diagram, we demonstrate a critical transition where phases merge, and PGK exhibits large structural fluctuations. Above the critical point, the difference between the intermediate and unfolded phases disappears. When ϕ increases, the critical point moves to lower Tc. We verify the calculations with experiments mapping the T-P-ϕ space, which likewise reveal a critical point at 305 K and 170 MPa that moves to lower Tc as ϕ increases. Crowding places PGK near a critical line in its natural parameter space, where large conformational changes can occur without costly free energy barriers. Specific structures are proposed for each phase based on simulation.
Subject Areas: Biological Physics, Soft Matter, Statistical Physics
I. INTRODUCTION
Complex processes in nature often arise at an order-disorder transition [1–4]. In proteins, this complexity arises from an almost perfect compensation of entropy by enthalpy: molecular interactions that create structural integrity are on the same scale as thermal fluctuations from the environment. The resulting marginal stability of proteins suggests that they could behave like fluids near a critical point [5] – their structures fluctuate considerably subject to small perturbations without overcoming a large activation barrier.
The concept of first order and critical phase transitions does not rigorously apply to nano-objects such as proteins, but is a useful one to classify folding transitions. For example, folding of small model proteins has been described as an abrupt, cooperative transition between the folded and unfolded phase for some proteins (the below-critical point scenario), or as a gradual barrier-less ‘downhill’ transition for other proteins (the above-critical point scenario) [6]. Even though critical behavior of proteins has been previously hinted [7–9], there has not been a direct observation of a critical point where one of these abrupt transitions simply disappears at Tc and Pc. In larger proteins, such as PGK ([10] in section S1), the situation can get even more complex: different parts or ‘domains’ of a large protein are more likely to be able to undergo separate order-disorder events [11], delicately poised between folded and partially unfolded structures to carry out their functions [12].
Proteins must fold and function while crowded by surrounding macromolecules [13], which perturb the structure of the proteins at physiological conditions in the cell. The volume exclusion from macromolecules [14], which places shape and size (or co-volume) [15,16] constraints on the conformational space (Fig. 1A), complicates protein folding and dynamics in living cells [17]. How the competing properties of a protein arise – being both stable yet dynamically sensitive to its environment – is largely unknown; however, we show that the crowded environment provides a unique solution by placing PGK near a critical regime.
We use pressure P, temperature T, and crowder-excluded volume fraction ϕ, to map PGK’s folding energy landscape [12,18] and its critical regime on the T-P-ϕ phase diagram. Temperature can induce heat unfolding by favoring states of high conformational entropy, or cold unfolding by favoring reduced solvent entropy when hydrating core amino acids in the protein [19,20]. Since folded proteins contain heterogeneously distributed small, dry cavities due to imperfect packing of their quasi-fractal topology [21–23], high pressure also induces unfolding by introducing water molecules (as small granular particles) into the cavities in protein structures, leading to reduced overall solvent-accessible volume of the unfolded protein [24]. Finally, in the presence of high crowding (large excluded volume fraction ϕ), compact desolvated (crystal) states are favored over less compact solvated (unfolded) states [12].
To investigate the opposing impact of macromolecular volume exclusion and solvation water on protein conformation, we utilized a minimalist protein model that incorporates the free energy cost of expelling a water molecule between a pair of residues in a contact (desolvation potential) [25]. This potential has a barrier that separates two minima that account for a native contact and a water-mediated contact. As pressure increases, the desovlation barrier increases and the free energy gap between the two minima tilts to favor the water-mediated contact, leading to an unfolding of a protein. We previously employed a similar model in molecular dynamics simulations to investigate compact conformations of PGK induced by macromolecular crowding [12] (Fig. 1 and [10] in section S2.2). Despite the model’s simplicity without capturing all the chemistry in a residue, this desolvation model predicts a folding mechanism involving water expulsion from the hydrophobic core, which has been observed by all-atomistic molecular dynamics [26] and validated by experiments in which the volume or polarity of amino acids is changed by mutation [27]. By studying the competition of temperature, pressure and crowding on the energy landscape, we are able to observe a rich ensemble of PGK states on a P-ϕ phase diagram (Fig. 2). By using scaling arguments from polymer physics, we derive a critical line, where the costly barrier between two phases disappears, on the isochore surface. As a consequence of being near the critical regime, PGK exhibits large structural fluctuations at physiologic conditions, which may be advantageous for enzymatic function.
To test our computational model, we observe structural transitions of PGK by fluorescence to construct the experimental T-P-ϕ phase diagram (Fig. 3). Experiment verifies the predicted existence of a critical point which moves to a lower temperature Tc as the crowding volume fraction ϕ is increased. Finally, a unified phase diagram is presented (Fig. 4) using analytically derived equation for Tc(ϕ) mapped onto the experimental results. Our current investigation is transforming the typical “structure-function” problem in proteins to a novel paradigm of a “structure-function-environment” relationship, and is a step toward developing universal thermodynamic principles of protein folding in living cells.
II. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A. T-P-ϕ phase diagram of PGK from simulation
We investigated the conformations of PGK, a large, 415 amino acid, two-domain protein ([10] in section S1 for more information on PGK), in an environment that includes cell-like excluded volume. From prior FRET experiments and molecular simulations, we gained knowledge of several PGK conformations that denote a phase diagram in the ϕ-T plane [12]. It includes C (crystal structure), CC (collapsed crystal), Sph (spherical compact state), and U (unfolded structures). In the C state, there is a linker that separates the N-terminal and C-terminal domains, resembling an open “pacman”. The CC state is a closed “pacman”. The Sph state involves a twisting of one of the domains with respect to the other and becomes more spherical than the CC state. A complete description of the structures of these states is in Supplemental Material [10] section S3.
By changing hydrostatic pressure and volume fraction of crowders at several temperatures, we have identified two new states on the ϕ-P isothermal phase plane (Fig. 2): I (folding intermediate), and SU (swollen compact unfolded structure). The criteria to define the six distinctive conformations are in Table S3.1 [10]. The I state is an ensemble of structures containing one folded domain (C-terminus) and one unfolded domain (N-terminus), making a specific prediction as to which domain is least stable on its own (N-terminal). SU is completely denatured, but exhibits a large number of water-mediated contacts (Fig. 1B). Thus, the SU state is structurally more compact than the U state.
The microscopic mechanism of pressure-induced unfolding of PGK depends on the temperature T and volume fraction ϕ of Ficoll 70 crowders. Ficoll 70 is a neutral crowding agent that is computationally modelled as hard spheres. Fig. 2 shows the P-ϕ phase plane at low T (a) and high T (c). At sufficiently low T and ϕ = 0 (no crowders) the unfolding of PGK is a multi-state transition between folded state C (Fig. 2 A&B) and unfolded state U via an intermediate state I. We capture the folding process using the overlap parameter χ ([10] for definition), which characterizes similarity to the crystal structure. In Fig. 2B, χ ranges from 0 for the C state to 1 for the U state, with the I state at about 0.35. The state I is a consequence of the heterogeneous distribution of cavities, causing a localized pressure-denaturation. Small packing differences between the domains are revealed by pressure. Since the sum total of cavity volume of the N-terminal domain (≈171 Å3) is larger than of the C-terminal domain (≈132 Å3), the former is more vulnerable to high pressure. Moreover, two anti-parallel β-strands m and n of the N-terminal domain are totally exposed to the solvent ([10] in section S5 and Fig S1.1). Under high pressure, they act as a channel for water to fill the N-terminal domain’s cavities. Therefore, the dominant intermediate contains an unfolded N-terminal domain and a folded C-terminal domain.
At sufficiently high T (Fig. 2C) or high ϕ (Fig. 2A, above the red critical point), the transition between folding and unfolding versus pressure exhibits only two states, without the folding intermediate I. As the limited void formed by the density fluctuations of crowders inhibits extended unfolded conformations [29], macromolecular crowding favors compact states like the spherical state Sph [28]. PGK’s domains collapse from C to Sph and CC states when the linker “cracks” [11] and forms a disordered hinge. High pressure competing with crowding gives rise to compact unfolded conformations where up to half of the contacts becomes swollen with water that forms a “wet interface” (swollen unfolded states, SU). Without extended unfolded conformations in the U state, the protein only needs to subtly reduce its volume as if it expels water molecules out of this wet core to return to the Sph state. There are effectively no barriers between the Sph, CC, and SU states, which are thus located in the same region of the phase diagram (see Figures 2A and 2B, and S5.2 [10]). This data supports the theory that protein dynamics is governed by the solvent motion [30], and water inside the protein “lubricates” the transitions between conformations without significant free energy costs [25].
Thus, our model predicts that PGK undergoes a critical transition with a value of Tc that decreases as ϕ is increased: crowding makes the folding of PGK apparent two-state at both low and high T, whereas lack of crowding produces a multi-state transition below Tc.
B. T-P-ϕ phase diagram of PGK from experiment
To validate the computed phase diagram, we measured the P-T phase diagram of PGK at various Ficoll 70 crowder concentrations to obtain the full P-T-ϕ information experimentally (Fig. 3). While one cannot expect the exact temperatures and pressures to agree, identical topologies of the experimental and computed phase diagrams validate the general conclusions from theory. Changes of state were detected by tryptophan fluorescence because tryptophan mean fluorescence wavelength is sensitive to water exposure as the protein unfolds. We scanned T from 283 to 318 K at constant P, and P from 0 to 250 MPa at constant T with 0, 25, 50, 100, 150, and 200 mg/mL of Ficoll concentration (ϕ = 0 to ≈ 0.56) to cover the complete phase diagram. Each transition produces a sigmoidal step in the plot of mean tryptophan fluorescence wavelength λm vs. P (Fig. S2.1 [10]). Singular value decomposition analysis ([10] in section S4) also strongly supports the conclusions obtained from analyzing λm.
In the absence of crowder at sufficiently low T (Fig. 3A, blue trace), there are two steps in λm as a function of pressure, signaling two separate transitions among three states. These steps are easily revealed by plotting ∂λm/∂P and identifying peaks (see Fig 3A, and Fig. S2.1 [10]). We assign the first peak to the C to I transition, the second to the I to U transition. At sufficiently high T, at ≥ 303 K and ≈170 MPa, one of the peaks disappears (Fig. 3C, blue trace), leaving only one transition between two states. We assign this to a direct transition from C to U from Fig. 2C, corresponding to a critical point at Tc = 306±3 K. Finally, when crowder is added, Tc moves to lower temperature, until the apparent three-state transition is no longer observed at all at 200 mg/ml Ficoll (Fig. 3AC, red traces). We assign this to the transition between C and SU/Sph/CC from Fig. 2A. Accurate transition midpoints (Tm, Pm, ϕm) were obtained from each trace by fitting to sigmoidal two- or three-state models (solid curves in Fig. 3A&C; see Appendix B; all data traces are shown [10] in section S4.)
We constructed T-P planes of the phase diagram at all crowder concentrations as follows: First, the transition midpoints were plotted on P-T slices at constant ϕ as shown in Fig. 3B. These points correspond to zero free energy difference, ΔG = 0, for the first-order transition, where concentrations of C and I, I and U, or C and U (depending on the location on the phase diagram) are equal. Then the transitions were fitted to Hawley’s elliptical P-T phase curve for proteins [31],
(1) |
at each value of ϕ (fits for all ϕ and parameter definitions in [10] section S4). Here Δβ, Δα, ΔCp, ΔV0, and ΔS0, signify changes in compressibility, thermal expansion coefficient, heat capacity, volume, and entropy, respectively. The resulting experimental phase diagram in Fig. 3B agrees with the computational data as both exhibit two pressure transitions at low T, one at high T, and a shift from two to three transitions at a value of Tc that decreases with increased crowding.
The simulation predicts that in the state I, the N-terminus would be unfolded and the C-terminus folded. We truncated the protein to the N-terminal domain, and indeed found it to be unfolded with long tryptophan fluorescence wavelength and no cooperative transition (Fig. S4.4 [10]). It is known from the literature [32] that the C-terminal domain of PGK is stable by itself. These two observations combined strongly support the computational assignment of the intermediate I to a state with the N-terminal domain largely unfolded, and the C-terminal domain largely folded. Thus, experiment and theory are in agreement both on the disappearance of a phase at high T or high ϕ, as well as the general structural features of an intermediate I formed at low crowding.
C. Unified T-P-ϕ phase diagram of PGK from theory and experiment
The three-dimensional T-P-ϕ phase diagram in Fig. 4C presents a unified picture of the computational and experimental results. In addition, Fig. 4A shows a computational low and high T slice in the ϕ-P plane, and Fig. 4B shows an experimental low ϕ and high ϕ slice in the P-T plane. As temperature increases, the second transition surface terminates in a critical line (bold red line on the red I-U coexistence surface in Fig. 4C). As the crowding volume fraction increases, the critical point shifts towards lower temperatures. Thus, above ϕ = ϕc ≈ 0.5 or above T = Tc0 ≈ 306 K the pressure-induced folding transition contains only two apparent phases. Whereas at low ϕ and T, PGK exhibits apparent three-state folding.
To quantitate the unified phase diagram, we modified Hawley’s theory by incorporating the free energy change due to crowding to construct the first transition surface (blue surface in Fig 4). We treat the folded and unfolded proteins as effective hard spheres and utilized scaled particle theory (SPT) to estimate the change in folding free energy as the difference between the insertion free energy for the folded and the unfolded states to first order approximation. As for the critical line on the second transition surface (in red in Fig 4), we used scaling arguments to derive the equation for the critical line,
#(2) |
by treating the proteins U to I transition similar to in the coil-globule transition of theory [33,34]. Here,
#(3) |
where Tc0 is the critical temperature without crowding, ϕc is the critical crowding volume fraction, Pc (≈ 170 MPa) is the critical pressure at Tc0, and and . From the fitting, we found γ = 0.40 with a possible range from 0.41 to 0.39 when including the margin of error. This is the predicted scaling exponent of a polymer collapse due to crowders, γ = 2/5 [35,36] (see Appendix C). From this phase diagram, we can see the protein moves through a rich space of structural states, suggesting different folding mechanisms that depend on how the phase diagram is traced out [37,38].
D. Consequences of criticality
In Fig. 5, we explore the impact of pressure and crowding on the folding of PGK. The consequences of the critical regime are revealed by the ensemble distributions of the cavity volume (conjugate variable of P) and co-volume (conjugate variable of ϕ) [15,16] from our simulations (also see Fig. S5.1 [10]). In the critical regime, small perturbations in crowding volume fraction, pressure, or temperature will greatly affect the system.
We investigate the response of the ensembles near the conformational distribution of structures close to the critical region by comparing the volume fluctuations (or proportionally, the compressibility) and structural fluctuations in the presence and absence of crowding agent. PGK has larger cavity volume fluctuations (δV2 = 〈V2〉 − 〈V〉2) (Fig. 5A) at ϕ = 0.4 with a peak at 6.6 ε/σ3 than that of ϕ = 0. We suspected that the critical regime is between at ϕ = 0.2 and 0.4 and between pressure 4.6 ε/σ3 and 6.6 ε/σ3 at a temperature of 0.97 ε/ kBT in the computational model, which qualitatively agrees with the experiment. Even though the cavity volume fluctuations are large in the presence of crowders, structures lie in a narrow range of co-volumes, making them indistinguishable to macromolecular crowding effects if shape can be neglected to 0th order (Fig. 5B). A sample of the diverse structures with similar cavity volumes and co-volumes are shown in Fig. 5C.
Not only does crowding shift the population of structures to more compact states such as CC or Sph (Fig. 2 and [12]), where the two ligand binding sites (for ADP and 1,3-DPG) come into close proximity of each other, but it also increases the structural fluctuations of the compact states by bringing PGK closer to the critical regime, as shown in Fig. 5. Both of these properties would most likely facilitate enzymatic activity. This is corroborated by previous FRET experiments that show an increase in PGK’s enzymatic activity as Ficoll 70 concentration increases [12]. These results suggest that criticality assists the enzymatic function of a protein.
III. CONCLUSION
In summary, we have shown direct evidence of equilibrium critical-like behavior on the T-P-ϕ phase diagram of a protein by computational simulations, by fluorescence spectroscopy, and by a theoretical argument based on polymer theory. Above the critical line in Fig. 4C (by increasing T and/or ϕ at Pc ≈ 170 MPa), the difference between the intermediate I and unfolded U phases disappears. This is due to the disappearance of the free energy barrier between the two phases (Fig 2B), and is validated by the high-pressure fluorescence measurements (Fig 3).
What is the origin of this critical behavior in proteins? Firstly, proteins are biopolymers that often undergo an abrupt or first-order-like transition to a compacted folded state from an expanded unfolded state or coil at a certain temperature (TF). Secondly, the coil-globule transition seen in other polymers is a continuous transition at a certain temperature (Tθ). Therefore, the first order transition in protein folding must be occurring near the collapse transition (TF ≈ Tθ), meaning it normally is tricritical [7]. In our system, the pressure perturbation may cause TF ≠ Tθ, separating the continuous and first-order transitions. When going from a continuous to a first-order transition, there are signatures of passing through a critical point [39,40]. Finally, when ϕ is high (ϕ > ϕc), the protein is collapsed even when it is unfolded resulting in no collapse transition. Our theoretical model in Eq. (3) and Appendix C captures this postulation of basis of criticality in proteins.
Furthermore, our computational and experimental results are in accord with the capillarity picture of folding [41], which posits a wetting interface between folded and unfolded parts of a protein, giving rise to a rich state space. Strong macromolecular crowding, which drives conformational changes to favor spherical states, roughens that wetting interface, allowing cavities to spread throughout the conformation of the protein, with two major consequences. A roughened interface reduces activation barriers for folding, driving multi-state transitions towards apparent two-state transitions. It also creates a critical state where heterogeneous conformations coexist, as the front of wetting interface moves across the protein.
We conclude that large structural fluctuations (Fig 5) and merging of protein phases are consequences of being close to a critical point (Fig 4C). At such a point, the barrier separating states vanishes (here: between I and U). Critical behavior has been proposed for protein folding at the onset of downhill folding [8], but its manifestation has been difficult to demonstrate computationally and experimentally [42]. Macromolecular crowding shifts the critical point to a lower temperature (Eq. (3)), indicating that such criticality could be physiologically important [3,4]: a protein near a critical state could access a wide range of conformations without large activation barriers for functional purposes inside the cell.
Further work will be needed to provide stronger evidence for the universality of critical behavior in proteins. Due to their complexity, proteins are not like other conventional condensed matter systems, and conventional tools, such as finite size scaling [43] or renormalization group theory [44], are not easily applicable. Our investigation is a starting point toward developing universal principles of protein folding relevant to the environmental perturbations inside living cells, and also inspiration to create new tools to understand critical phenomena in these complex systems.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Prof. Dave Thirumalai, Prof. Vassiliy Lubchenko, Prof. Greg Morrison, and Prof. Peter G. Wolynes for stimulating discussions. M.B.P. was a Howard Hughes Medical Institute International Student Research Fellow, and then a Helen Hay Whitney Foundation Postdoctoral Fellow. A.G.G is supported by a training fellowship on the Houston Area Molecular Biophysics Program (T32 GM008280). M.S.C. and A.G.G. were funded by the National Science Foundation (MCB-1412532, PHY-1427654, ACI-1531814), and thank computing resources from the Center for Advanced Computing and Data Systems at UH. M.G. and M.B.P. were funded by NIH grant GM093318.
APPENDIX A: SIMULATION MODEL
The emergence of structure and function from a protein sequence makes the modeling of proteins from first principle (ab initio models) computationally and theoretically prohibitive. Therefore, experimentally derived structural information is needed (even in models termed “all-atom”, which refine ab initio force field parameters to fit experimentally known structures) to capture key features in protein folding and dynamics [45]. A structure-based model is one of the minimalist protein models to incorporate experimentally derived structural information [46] to investigate the mechanism of protein folding dynamics. It is often utilized as the “ideal gas” of protein folding for the investigation of a wide range of folding mechanisms [2,47]. This model renders an energy landscape [48] with minimal frustration and contains a dominant basin of attraction, corresponding to an experimentally determined configuration [49]. This “necklace and beads” model carries the added bonus of being computationally inexpensive, enabling long-timescale simulations to be obtained for our large protein and macromolecular crowding system. Additionally, structure-based models tend to capture unfolded protein scaling laws better than all-atom models [50], which is necessary to correctly characterize the various non-crystal states of PGK. Lastly, high pressure is known to unfold proteins on a longer time scale; therefore, structure-based, minimalist-model simulations provide statistically significant results. Similar to adding specific complexity to the ideal gas model to study specific phenomena, we add the desolvation barrier [25] to the native interactions that accounts for the free energy cost to expel a water molecule in the first hydration shell between two hydrophobic residues [51] to study pressure unfolding, leading to the appearance of a partially folded intermediate. The use of this model has been validated in other systems [27]. The Hamiltonian of this structure-based protein model is as follows:
(4) |
where Γ is a configuration of the set r, θ, ϕ. The rij term is the distance between ith and jth residues, θ is the angle between three consecutive beads, and ϕ is the dihedral angle defined over four sequential residues. δ is the Kronecker delta function. Γ0 = {{r0},{θ0},{ϕ0}} is obtained from the crystal structure configuration. Lastly, U(rij) is desolvation potential. Crowders are modeled as hard spheres. The complete descriptions of a structure-based protein model, desolvation potential, and simulations of PGK in a periodic cubic box of Ficoll 70 are provided in the Supplemental Material [10]. All simulations were performed using GROMACS 2016.3 molecular dynamics software [52].
APPENDIX B: HIGH PRESURE FLUORESCENCE EXPERIMENT METHODS
Fluorescence experiments were carried out at high pressure using a high-pressure cell (ISS High-Pressure Cell System) on a fluorimeter (JASCO FP8300). A computerized high-pressure generator (Pressure BioSciences Inc. HUB440) was used to pressurize the fluorescence cell. We used a rectangular quartz cuvette with a path length of 6 mm and deionized water was used as pressurizing fluid. The pressure was raised from 0.1 MPa to 250 MPa at a rate of 10 MPa/min and held at intervals of 10 MPa for a 5 min wait time to allow sample equilibration. Fluorescence spectra from 300 to 450 nm were acquired in the middle of the wait time and an in-built proportional-integral-derivative (PID) feedback loop was used to obtain accurate pressures (within 5 bars of target pressure). The temperature was controlled using an external water-circulating bath. To construct a complete P-T-ϕ phase diagram, fluorescence measurements were done at 6 different Ficoll concentrations ([Ficoll] = 0, 25, 50, 100, 150 and 200 mg/ml), each at 6 different temperatures T ranging from from 282K to 317K (9°C to 44°C). Equilibrium traces of mean fluorescence wavelength vs. pressure (e.g. Fig. 3 left) were fit to a two-state or three-state thermodynamic model (see Supplementary Material [10]), depending on whether the derivative (Fig. S1.2 [10]) of the titration curve identified one or two transitions (An inflection point in the fluorescence vs. P trace at given T and [Ficoll] produces a peak in the derivative). The fitted transition midpoints (P, T, ϕ) were then plotted in a phase diagram (e.g. Fig. 3 middle) and fitted to Eq. (1). See [10] for complete data and fitting parameters.
APPENDIX C: CONSTRUCTION OF PHASE DIAGRAM
We derived the critical line on the P-T-ϕ phase diagram using arguments based on the coil-globule transition [33,34] of a polymer. Beginning with a Landau-Ginsberg free energy [53], F = −r(T,ϕ)Ψ2 + sΨ4 + F0, to describe the critical transition, where Ψ is the order parameter, which is a scaled and shifted Rg (radius of gyration) so that Ψ = − Ψ0 for the I state and Ψ = + Ψ0 for the U state. Since pressure is only involved with the first-order transitions, it can be ignored for now. At the critical temperature, the barrier between the I and U states vanishes, meaning r = 0; therefore, a reasonable function is r(T,ϕ) = r0[T − Tc(ϕ)], where the critical temperature Tc is a function of ϕ. To find the ϕ dependence of Tc, we used the scaling relationship
#(5) |
which relates Rg at a given ϕ to Rg without crowders for the collapse of a coil to globule transition [35]. The scaling exponent γ, is shown to be 2/5 in Refs [35,36]. Since the collapse of the polymer, or in our case the protein, is dependent on ϕ, and since Ψ2 ~ Rg(ϕ)2/Rg(0)2, the critical temperature Tc(ϕ) causing the free energy barrier between I and U to disappear must also scale as Eq. (5), giving Eq. (3). We fit Eq. (3) to the experimental critical point values at all Ficoll 70 concentrations to find γ and ϕc. We fit Eq. (2) to experimental values of the I to U transition surface to find the Taylor expansion coefficients.
Lastly, we modified Hawly’s equation [31] to fit the C to I (or U, depending on T and ϕ) transition surface. Similar to Minton’s theory [16], we added a ϕ-dependent ΔGcrowd(ϕ) term to Eq. (1),
#(6) |
which treats the folded and unfolded proteins as effective hard spheres and employs scaled particle theory (SPT) to estimate the change in folding free energy as the difference between the insertion free energy for the folded and the unfolded states [54].
References
- [1].Crutchfield JP, Nat. Phys 8, 17 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- [2].Whitford PC, Sanbonmatsu KY, and Onuchic JN, Reports Prog. Phys 75, 76601 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Mora T and Bialek W, J. Stat. Phys 144, 268 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- [4].Munoz MA, Rev. Mod. Phys 90, 31001 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- [5].Wolynes PG, Onuchic JN, and Thirumalai D, Science (80-.) 267, 1619 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Onuchic JN, Wolynes PG, Luthey-Schulten Z, and Socci ND, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 92, 3626 (1995). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Li MS, Klimov DK, and Thirumalai D, Phys. Rev. Lett 93, 268107 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Cho SS, Weinkam P, and Wolynes PG, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 105, 118 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Tang Q-Y, Zhang Y-Y, Wang J, Wang W, and Chialvo DR, Phys. Rev. Lett 118, 88102 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10]. See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for simulation and experiment details, and further analysis.
- [11].Miyashita O, Onuchic JN, and Wolynes PG, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 100, 12570 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Dhar A, Samiotakis A, Ebbinghaus S, Nienhaus L, Homouz D, Gruebele M, and Cheung MS, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Zimmerman SB and Trach SO, J. Mol. Biol 222, 599 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Asakura S and Oosawa F, J. Chem. Phys 22, 1255 (1954). [Google Scholar]
- [15].Minton AP, Biopolym. Orig. Res. Biomol 20, 2093 (1981). [Google Scholar]
- [16].Minton AP, Biophys. J 88, 971 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Gruebele M, Dave K, and Sukenik S, Annu. Rev. Biophys 45, 233 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Luong TQ, Kapoor S, and Winter R, ChemPhysChem 16, 3555 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Dias CL, Ala-Nissila T, Karttunen M, Vattulainen I, and Grant M, Phys. Rev. Lett 100, 118101 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Sirovetz BJ, Schafer NP, and Wolynes PG, J. Phys. Chem. B 119, 11416 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Dewey TG, Fractals in Molecular Biophysics (Oxford University Press, 1998). [Google Scholar]
- [22].Reuveni S, Granek R, and Klafter J, Phys. Rev. Lett 100, 208101 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Chowdary PD and Gruebele M, J. Phys. Chem. A 113, 13139 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Roche J, Caro JA, Norberto DR, Barthe P, Roumestand C, Schlessman JL, Garcia AE, Royer CA, and others, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Cheung MS, Garćia AE, and Onuchic JN, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 99, 685 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Shea J-E, Onuchic JN, and Brooks CL, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 99, 16064 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Fernandez-Escamilla AM, Cheung MS, Vega MC, Wilmanns M, Onuchic JN, and Serrano L, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 101, 2834 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Homouz D, Perham M, Samiotakis A, Cheung MS, and Wittung-Stafshede P, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 105, 11754 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Shaw MR and Thirumalai D, Phys. Rev. A 44, R4797 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Fenimore PW, Frauenfelder H, McMahon BH, and Parak FG, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 99, 16047 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Hawley SA, Biochemistry 10, 2436 (1971). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Osváth S, Sabelko JJ, and Gruebele M, J. Mol. Biol 333, 187 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Lifshitz IM, Grosberg AY, and Khokhlov AR, Rev. Mod. Phys 50, 683 (1978). [Google Scholar]
- [34].De Gennes P-G and Gennes P-G, Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics (Cornell university press, 1979). [Google Scholar]
- [35].Thirumalai D, Phys. Rev. A 37, 269 (1988). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Kang H, Pincus PA, Hyeon C, and Thirumalai D, Phys. Rev. Lett 114, 68303 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Zhuravlev PI, Hinczewski M, Chakrabarti S, Marqusee S, and Thirumalai D, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 113, E715 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Pierse CAand Dudko OK, Phys. Rev. Lett 118, 88101 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Taylor MP, Paul W, and Binder K, Phys. Rev. E 79, 50801 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Maffi C, Baiesi M, Casetti L, Piazza F, and De Los Rios P, Nat. Commun 3, 1065 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Wolynes PG, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 94, 6170 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Sabelko J, Ervin J, and Gruebele M, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 96, 6031 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Binder K, Zeitschrift Für Phys. B Condens. Matter 43, 119 (1981). [Google Scholar]
- [44].Wilson KG, Phys. Rev. B 4, 3174 (1971). [Google Scholar]
- [45].Freddolino PL, Harrison CB, Liu Y, and Schulten K, Nat. Phys 6, 751 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Clementi C, Nymeyer H, and Onuchic JN, J. Mol. Biol 298, 937 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Papoian GA, Coarse-Grained Modeling of Biomolecules (CRC Press, 2017). [Google Scholar]
- [48].Bryngelson JD and Wolynes PG, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 84, 7524 (1987). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Leopold PE, Montal M, and Onuchic JN, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 89, 8721 (1992). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Hu J, Chen T, Wang M, Chan HS, and Zhang Z, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys 19, 13629 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Hillson N, Onuchic JN, and Garćia AE, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 96, 14848 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Berendsen HJC, van der Spoel D, and van Drunen R, Comput. Phys. Commun 91, 43 (1995). [Google Scholar]
- [53].Landau LD, Lifshitz EM, and Pitaevskii LP, Statistical Physics (Course of Theoretical Physics Vol 5), Third edit (Pergamon Press, New York, 1980). [Google Scholar]
- [54].Lebowitz JL and Rowlinson JS, J. Chem. Phys 41, 133 (1964). [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.