Understanding the current status of influenza A viruses of swine (IAVs-S) and their evolution at the farm level is important for controlling these pathogens. Efforts to monitor IAVs-S during 2015 to 2019 yielded H1N1, H1N2, and H3N2 viruses. H1 genes in Japanese swine formed a unique clade in the classical swine H1 lineage of 1A.1, and H3 genes originating from 1999–2000 human seasonal influenza viruses appear to have become established among Japanese swine. A(H1N1)pdm09-derived H1 genes became introduced repeatedly and reassorted with endemic IAVs-S, resulting in various combinations of surface and internal genes among pig populations in Japan. At the farm level, multiple introductions of IAVs-S with phylogenetically distinct HA sequences occurred, or IAVs-S derived from a single introduction have persisted for at least 3 years with only a single mutation at the antigenic site of the HA protein. Continued monitoring of IAVs-S is necessary to update and maximize control strategies.
KEYWORDS: Japan, influenza, phylogeny, pig, reassortment
ABSTRACT
To assess the current status of influenza A viruses of swine (IAVs-S) throughout Japan and to investigate how these viruses persisted and evolve on pig farms, we genetically characterized IAVs-S isolated during 2015 to 2019. Nasal swab samples collected through active surveillance and lung tissue samples collected for diagnosis yielded 424 IAVs-S, comprising 78 H1N1, 331 H1N2, and 15 H3N2 viruses, from farms in 21 sampled prefectures in Japan. Phylogenetic analyses of surface genes revealed that the 1A.1 classical swine H1 lineage has evolved uniquely since the late 1970s among pig populations in Japan. During 2015 to 2019, A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses repeatedly became introduced into farms and reassorted with endemic H1N2 and H3N2 IAVs-S. H3N2 IAVs-S isolated during 2015 to 2019 formed a clade that originated from 1999–2000 human seasonal influenza viruses; this situation differs from previous reports, in which H3N2 IAVs-S derived from human seasonal influenza viruses were transmitted sporadically from humans to swine but then disappeared without becoming established within the pig population. At farms where IAVs-S were frequently isolated for at least 3 years, multiple introductions of IAVs-S with phylogenetically distinct hemagglutinin (HA) genes occurred. In addition, at one farm, IAVs-S derived from a single introduction persisted for at least 3 years and carried no mutations at the deduced antigenic sites of the hemagglutinin protein, except for one at the antigenic site (Sa). Our results extend our understanding regarding the status of IAVs-S currently circulating in Japan and how they genetically evolve at the farm level.
IMPORTANCE Understanding the current status of influenza A viruses of swine (IAVs-S) and their evolution at the farm level is important for controlling these pathogens. Efforts to monitor IAVs-S during 2015 to 2019 yielded H1N1, H1N2, and H3N2 viruses. H1 genes in Japanese swine formed a unique clade in the classical swine H1 lineage of 1A.1, and H3 genes originating from 1999–2000 human seasonal influenza viruses appear to have become established among Japanese swine. A(H1N1)pdm09-derived H1 genes became introduced repeatedly and reassorted with endemic IAVs-S, resulting in various combinations of surface and internal genes among pig populations in Japan. At the farm level, multiple introductions of IAVs-S with phylogenetically distinct HA sequences occurred, or IAVs-S derived from a single introduction have persisted for at least 3 years with only a single mutation at the antigenic site of the HA protein. Continued monitoring of IAVs-S is necessary to update and maximize control strategies.
INTRODUCTION
Influenza A virus of swine (IAV-S) is a major respiratory pathogen and causes broadly prevalent disease in pigs worldwide. IAV-S typically causes mild symptoms, such as fever, loss of appetite, dullness, and low mortality rates (1), but coinfection with IAV-S and other pathogens, such as porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, increases the mortality rate and decreases average daily weight gain (2). Thus, IAV-S, alone and in combination with other pathogens, causes tremendous economic loss for pig farmers worldwide (3, 4). Additionally, pigs are susceptible to both human and avian influenza viruses, as they express the receptors to both influenza viruses on their tracheal epithelial cells (5). With such characteristics, pigs serve as a reservoir and a “mixing vessel” in which reassortment events of influenza viruses occur to generate novel gene constellations with pandemic potential (6). Therefore, surveillance activities on IAV-S have been accelerated not only for moderating the economic loss to the swine industry all over the world but also for monitoring emerging IAVs-S with the potential to be the next pandemic.
Worldwide circulation of IAV-S changed dramatically after the pandemic caused by A(H1N1)2009 [A(H1N1)pdm09] viruses. Before 2009, three IAV-S subtypes, H1N1, H1N2, and H3N2, predominated in swine throughout the world (7). Classical swine H1N1 IAVs-S were first isolated in North America in 1930 and have been infecting pigs endemically there since the 1970s, currently circulating among pig population worldwide, whereas avian-like H1N1 IAVs-S have stably persisted in Europe since 1979 (7, 8). In Asia, avian-like H1N1 IAVs-S was first isolated in China in 1993 (7, 9, 10), and reassortant IAVs-S containing genes derived from avian-like H1N1 IAVs-S have been reported in Thailand (11–14), South Korea (15), and Vietnam (16). A/Hong Kong/1968-like H3N2 viruses have been isolated from pigs in Asia and Europe, indicating the worldwide circulation of human-like H3N2 IAVs-S, while some cases of the isolation of avian-like H3N2 IAVs-S were reported in Asia in the 1970s (17–21). In 1998, a triple-reassortant H3N2 virus emerged in North America through reassortment among a human seasonal virus, a classical swine IAV-S, and an avian influenza virus, which was followed by the emergence of H1N1 and H1N2 triple-reassortant IAVs-S and their circulation in North America. (22). Subsequently, in April 2009, an IAV containing a combination of segments from both the above-described triple-reassortant virus and Eurasian avian-like swine lineages spread rapidly to cause a worldwide pandemic in humans (23, 24). After the 2009 pandemic, A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses were introduced into swine populations and reassorted with endemic IAVs-S, further increasing genetic diversity among IAVs-S all over the world (25–37).
The pig industry in Japan has risen to intensive production recently; fewer but bigger pig farms are distributed around Japan, raising a total of about 9 million pigs and producing about 900,000 tons of pork in Japan in 2019. To evade the introduction of pathogens from foreign countries, imported live pigs are quarantined for 15 days at an animal quarantine station. Classical swine H1N1 IAVs-S are thought to have been introduced into the swine population in Japan during the late 1970s (38, 39). Cases of the isolation of human-like H3N2 IAVs-S from pigs were sporadic and few during 1970 to 2013 (33, 40, 41). After the introduction of a classical swine H1N1 IAV-S, it was replaced by the reassortant H1N2 IAVs-S that carried the hemagglutinin (HA) gene of the classical swine lineage and human-like neuraminidase (NA) gene. After the 1980s, the H1N2 IAVs-S have circulated predominantly among Japanese swine, and an H1N1 IAV-S possessing both H1 and N1 genes from the classical swine lineage has been rarely isolated (42–44). After the pandemic in 2009, A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses were introduced into pig populations in Japan, and genetic reassortment occurred between A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses and endemic H1N1, H1N2, and H3N2 viruses that had circulated previously (33, 41). However, information regarding IAVs-S in Japan remains sparse and localized to limited areas. Furthermore, the dynamics of IAVs-S at the farm level in Japan are unclear.
To understand the status of IAVs-S among pig populations in Japan, from 2015 through 2019, we collected nasal swab samples from pigs on farms in 21 prefectures in Japan for virus isolation and phylogenetic analyses. Simultaneously, we monitored several pig farms for at least 3 years to examine how IAVs-S circulated within these populations. The findings from our study will improve our understanding of IAVs-S currently circulating in Japan and how they evolve at the farm level.
RESULTS
Subtyping and geographic distribution of IAV-S in Japan.
The swabs collected through the active surveillance efforts in this study yielded 370 IAVs-S, giving an overall IAV-S isolation rate of 5.2% (see Tables S1 and S2 in the supplemental material). In addition, 54 isolates were obtained from the specimens submitted for diagnosis during 2015 to 2019. Overall, 78 of the 424 total IAVs-S were subtyped as H1N1, 331 as H1N2, and 15 as H3N2. In addition, the lineages of the HA and NA genes were determined through phylogenetic analysis. Specifically, the H1 HA genes of 37 H1N1 and 319 H1N2 viruses belong to the 1A.1 classical swine lineage, whereas those of 41 H1N1 and 12 H1N2 viruses belong to the 1A.3.3.2 lineage [A(H1N1)pdm09] (Fig. 1 and Fig. S1). The H1 HA genes of the 1A.1 classical swine lineage share a common ancestor with the IAVs-S in Japan during the late 1970s, indicating that they have been circulating domestically for approximately 40 years (Fig. 2A and Fig. S2).
All 15 of the H3N2 IAVs-S isolated here are located in a clade belonging to the human seasonal lineage (Fig. 1 and Fig. S3). These IAVs-S are related to the human influenza viruses that circulated during the 1999–2000 season, and their ancestral strain in swine, A/swine/Japan/KU-MD4/2013, was first isolated in 2013 (Fig. 2B and Fig. S4). All 78 N1 genes of the H1N1 IAVs-S isolated here originated from A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses (Fig. 1 and Fig. S5), even though 37 of the H1N1 IAVs-S had H1 HA genes of the classical swine lineage. All 346 N2 genes of the 331 H1N2 IAVs-S and 15 H3N2 IAVs-S were classified into the human seasonal lineage (Fig. 1 and Fig. S6). However, a cluster consisting of N2 genes of the H1N2 IAVs-S was phylogenetically distinct from that of H3N2 IAVs-S. These H1N2 IAVs-S are related to the late-1960 seasonal viruses, which were derived from Hong Kong H3N2 viruses (Fig. 3A and Fig. S7), whereas those of the H3N2 IAVs-S are related to the 1999–2000 seasonal influenza viruses, which correspond to the origin of their H3 genes (Fig. 3B and Fig. S8).
The number of IAVs-S with various combinations of surface genes and the number of IAV-S-positive farms in each prefecture and year indicate the breadth of distribution of IAVs-S in Japan and their persistence on some farms (Table 1). During 2015 to 2019, H1N1 IAVs-S with solely A(H1N1)pdm09-derived surface genes (P-P) were isolated from 18 farms in 9 prefectures. H1N2 IAVs-S with 1A.1 classical swine H1 but human seasonal N2 genes (C-H) were distributed on 14 farms in 4 prefectures. Reassortant H1N1 IAVs-S, carrying 1A.1 classical swine H1 and A(H1N1)pdm09-derived N1 genes (C-P), were found on 6 farms in 2 prefectures, and those harboring 1A.3.3.2 A(H1N1)pdm09 H1 and human seasonal N2 genes (P-H) were isolated from 2 farms in a single prefecture. H3N2 IAVs-S with human seasonal H3 and N2 genes (H-H) were found on 5 farms in 4 prefectures.
TABLE 1.
Prefecture | 2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. of positive farms (no. of strains isolated) |
No. of negative farms | No. of tested farms | No. of positive farms (no. of strains isolated) |
No. of negative farms | No. of tested farms | No. of positive farms (no. of strains isolated) |
No. of negative farms | No. of tested farms | No. of positive farms (no. of strains isolated) |
No. of negative farms | No. of tested farms | No. of positive farms (no. of strains isolated) |
No. of negative farms | No. of tested farms | |||||||||||||||||||||
H1N1 |
H1N2 |
H3N2(H-H) | H1N1 |
H1N2 |
H3N2(H-H) | H1N1 |
H1N2 |
H3N2(H-H) | H1N1 |
H1N2 |
H3N2(H-H) | H1N1 |
H1N2 |
H3N2(H-H) | |||||||||||||||||||||
(P-P)a | (C-P) | (P-H) | (C-H) | (P-P) | (C-P) | (P-H) | (C-H) | (P-P) | (C-P) | (P-H) | (C-H) | (P-P) | (C-P) | (P-H) | (C-H) | (P-P) | (C-P) | (P-H) | (C-H) | ||||||||||||||||
Hokkaido | 2 (4) | 2 | 4 | 1 (1) | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Tochigi | 1 (1) | 1 (3) | 1 | 3 | 2 (2) | 0 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ibaraki | 1 (1) | 0 | 1 | 1 (1) | 0 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gunma | 1 (1) | 3 (5) | 4 (13) | 1 | 8 | 1 (9) | 4 (5) | 8 (129) | 0 | 9 | 7 (51) | 5 | 12 | 2 (5) | 8 (26) | 1 | 10 | 8 (59) | 3 | 11 | |||||||||||||||
Chiba | 1 (8) | 3 (3) | 0 | 3 | 1 (5) | 1 (21) | 0 | 1 | 1 (11) | 1 (4) | 0 | 1 | 1 (3) | 1 (1) | 1 (1) | 0 | 1 | 1 (9) | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
Niigata | 1 (6) | 0 | 1 | 1 (2) | 0 | 1 | 2 (4) | 0 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aichi | 3 (5) | 12 | 15 | 1 (1) | 0 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tottori | 1 (3) | 0 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Okayama | 1 (1) | 0 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nagasaki | 1 (2) | 1 | 2 | 1 (2) | 0 | 1 | 1 (2) | 0 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Miyazaki | 1 (2) | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kagoshima | 1 (1) | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 (1) | 0 | 1 | 2 (4) | 0 | 2 | 2 (6) | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Aomori | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Iwate | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yamagata | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shizuoka | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hiroshima | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fukuoka | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Saga | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oita | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kumamoto | 2 | 2 |
Surface genes derived from A(H1N1)pdm09 (P), 1A.1 classical swine (C), and human seasonal (H) viruses, respectively. For example, H1N1(C-P) indicates IAVs-S with 1A.1 classical swine HA and A(H1N1)pdm09 NA genes.
The geographic distributions of the viruses corresponding to these 5 combinations of surface genes were plotted on the map of Japan (Fig. 4). Of the 21 prefectures where samples were collected during 2015 to 2019, C-H H1N2 IAVs-S were isolated from 4 prefectures around the center of Japan (Chiba, Gunma, Ibaraki, and Tochigi). P-P H1N1 IAVs-S were isolated from 9 prefectures: 3 on the southern island, Kyushu (Kagoshima, Miyazaki, and Nagasaki); 5 on the main island, Honshu (Aichi, Gunma, Okayama, Tochigi, and Tottori); and 1 on the northern island, Hokkaido. C-P H1N1 IAVs-S were isolated in Chiba prefecture, and P-H H1N2 IAVs-S were obtained in Niigata and Aichi prefectures. H-H H3N2 IAVs-S were isolated from 3 prefectures on Kyushu (Kagoshima, Miyazaki, and Nagasaki) and from Chiba prefecture.
Gene constellations and their numbers in the present study revealed all IAVs-S isolated here had at least 1 gene that was derived from an A(H1N1)pdm09 virus, except for a single strain isolated in Tochigi prefecture: A/swine/Tochigi/38-7119/2019 (H1N2) inherited all of its genes from Japanese pig isolates that circulated during the 1990s and 2000s (Fig. 5 and Fig. S9).
Genetic evolution of IAVs-S among pig populations on selected farms.
During 2015 to 2019, active surveillance over prolonged periods yielded continuous isolation of IAVs-S on some farms (Table 2). Out of the 12 farms where IAVs-S were isolated twice or more through active surveillance, single-genotype IAV-S was introduced and persisted at 4 farms (004, 034, 006, and 012), while 8 farms (001, 007, 009, 010, 011, 008, 035, and 040) experienced multiple introductions. In particular, farms 001, 006, 007, and 012 were IAV-S positive at least 15 times during 3 years or more. The evolutionary analyses of the HA genes of those isolates as well as their genetic constellations revealed that farms 001 (Fig. 6) and 007 (Fig. 7) had experienced multiple introductions of different genotypes, whereas farms 006 (Fig. 8) and 012 (Fig. 9) had virus persistence, where viruses originated from a single introduction persisting for 3 or more years. All 4 farms applied farrow-to-finish operating systems, and 300, 500, 1,000, and 2,000 sows were raised at farms 001, 006, 007, and 012, respectively.
TABLE 2.
Prefecture | Farm no. | No. of samplings (no. IAVs-S positive) |
No. of IAVs-S-positive/total no. of samplings (%) | No. of IAVs-S isolated | Duration of IAV-S persistencea (no. of mo) | Deduced no. of introductions | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | ||||||
Gunma | 007 | 20 (20) | 2 (2) | 10 (10) | 4 (4) | 2 (2) | 2 (2) | 100 | 84 | 42 | 1 H1N1, 2 H1N2 |
Chiba | 001 | 27 (20) | 5 (4) | 12 (9) | 6 (4) | 2 (2) | 2 (1) | 74.1 | 67 | 42 | 6 H1N2, 1 H3N2 |
Gunma | 012 | 20 (16) | 2 (2) | 10 (9) | 4 (2) | 2 (2) | 2 (1) | 80 | 40 | 39 | 1 H1N2 |
Gunma | 006 | 20 (15) | 2 (1) | 10 (7) | 4 (3) | 2 (2) | 2 (2) | 75 | 69 | 42 | 1 H1N2 |
Gunma | 010 | 13 (9) | 2 (1) | 10 (8) | 1 (0) | 0 | 0 | 69.2 | 16 | 9 | 2 H1N2 |
Gunma | 040 | 12 (9) | 0 | 3 (2) | 5 (4) | 2 (2) | 2 (1) | 75 | 13 | 34 | 2 H1N1, 2 H1N2 |
Gunma | 009 | 20 (8) | 2 (1) | 10 (5) | 4 (1) | 2 (1) | 2 (0) | 40 | 19 | 25 | 1 H1N1, 2 H1N2 |
Gunma | 011 | 13 (6) | 2 (1) | 10 (5) | 1 (1) | 0 | 0 | 46.2 | 12 | 11 | 2 H1N2 |
Gunma | 034 | 7 (5) | 0 | 0 | 3 (2) | 2 (1) | 2 (2) | 71.4 | 8 | 24 | 1 H1N2 |
Gunma | 008 | 13 (4) | 2 (0) | 10 (4) | 1 (0) | 0 | 0 | 30.8 | 20 | 4 | 1 H1N1, 1 H1N2 |
Gunma | 035 | 7 (4) | 0 | 0 | 3 (1) | 2 (2) | 2 (1) | 57.1 | 11 | 24 | 2 H1N2 |
Hokkaido | 004 | 6 (2) | 1 (1) | 2 (1) | 2 (0) | 1 (0) | 0 | 33.3 | 2 | 12 | 1 H1N1 |
Kagoshima | 043 | 2 (1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (1) | 0 | 50 | 3 | ||
Gunma | 036 | 7 (1) | 0 | 0 | 3 (0) | 2 (0) | 2 (1) | 14.3 | 4 | ||
Hokkaido | 003 | 6 (1) | 1 (1) | 2 (0) | 2 (0) | 1 (0) | 0 | 16.7 | 3 | ||
Kagoshima | 037 | 3 (1) | 0 | 0 | 1 (0) | 2 (1) | 0 | 33.3 | 2 | ||
Gunma | 045 | 2 (1) | 0 | 0 | 1 (0) | 1 (1) | 0 | 50 | 1 | ||
Hokkaido | 002 | 6 (0) | 1 (0) | 2 (0) | 2 (0) | 1 (0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Hokkaido | 005 | 6 (0) | 1 (0) | 2 (0) | 2 (0) | 1 (0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Kagoshima | 013 | 4 (0) | 0 | 4 (0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Kagoshima | 027 | 2 (0) | 0 | 2 (0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The longest period that IAV-S was repeatedly isolated in the farm, regardless of genotypes.
On farm 001, H1N1 and its reassortant H1N2 IAVs-S (yellow-green) were circulating from October 2015 to September 2016 (Fig. 6). Phylogenetically distinct H1N2 IAVs-S (orange) were sporadically isolated during the same period. Closely related but apparently distinct H1N2 IAVs-S (purple) emerged on the farm and circulated from March to October 2016; this was followed by replacement by other related H1N1 strains (red) from April 2017 to November 2018. In February 2017, H3N2 IAVs-S were isolated at the farm, and a progeny IAV-S was isolated 1 year later (Fig. 2B and Fig. S4). Introduction of two other clusters of H1N2 IAVs-S occurred during 2018 to 2019. One cluster has been isolated since November 2018 (green), and another was first isolated in May 2019 (blue). The N2 genes of A/swine/Chiba/1-6328/2018 and 7 IAVs-S isolated in May 2019 were genetically distinguishable from the N2 genes of other H1N2 IAVs-S at the farm (Fig. S7); the N2 genes of these viruses were phylogenetically distinct from those of the H3N2 IAVs-S. All internal genes of the H1N2 isolates were derived from A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses. In contrast, 5 of the internal genes (PB2, PB1, PA, MP, and NS) of the H1N1 IAVs-S were derived from A(H1N1)pdm09, but all of the NP genes were derived from 1A.1 classical swine H1 IAVs-S closely related to Japanese pig isolates during the 1990s and 2000s (Fig. 5 and Fig. S9). All of the internal genes of the H3N2 IAVs-S at the farm were A(H1N1)pdm09 in origin. However, the PB2, PB1, PA, and MP genes were phylogenetically distinguishable from those of H1 IAVs-S on the farm, although NP and NS genes were shared with them, indicating the reassortment of H1 and H3 IAVs-S.
In the case of farm 007, two phylogenetically distinct 1A.1 classical swine H1 IAVs-S were introduced (Fig. 7A and B). One was first isolated in November 2015 and persisted until January 2019; the other was isolated in May 2019. In addition to 1A.1 classical swine H1 IAVs-S, an 1A.3.3.2 H1 IAV-S that originated from an A(H1N1)pdm09 virus circulating within the human population during the 2012–2013 season was isolated in December 2015. Likewise, the NA genes of those isolates were phylogenetically classified into 3 groups: 2 groups derived from human seasonal-derived N2 genes and the remaining group from an A(H1N1)pdm09-derived N1 gene. All internal genes were derived from A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses and comprised 3 phylogenetically distinct groups.
At two farms, 006 and 012, H1N2 IAVs-S with 1A.1 classical swine H1 and human seasonal N2 genes derived from a single introduction had circulated for more than 3 years (Fig. 8 and 9). On farm 006, H1N2 IAVs-S were first isolated in November 2015, and they persisted until May 2019. At farm 012, H1N2 IAVs-S persisted from November 2015 to February 2019. An IAV-S genetically related to the strains on farm 012, A/swine/Gunma/46-6975/2019, was isolated at another farm in the same prefecture during May 2019. The N2 and internal genes of all IAVs-S isolated at farm 006 formed a single clade in phylogenetic trees constructed for all genes, indicating that they were all derived from the single introduction. Likewise, all genes of the IAVs-S at farm 012 formed a single clade.
DISCUSSION
The aims of this study were to illustrate the current situation of IAVs-S in pig populations in Japan and to show how IAVs-S genetically evolved at farms where they were isolated over a long period of time. Our phylogenetic analyses of HA genes revealed that 3 types of IAVs-S have been isolated in Japan. As reported previously (42–44), the 1A.1 classical swine H1 lineage in Japan has evolved uniquely in Japanese pig populations, as neither a human nor foreign isolate carrying an HA gene related to 1A.1 classical swine H1 genes of Japanese pig isolates has been reported since the late 1970s. Although triple-reassortant H3N2 viruses related to isolates in Canada were obtained in Japan during animal quarantine (45), they do not appear to have become introduced into the swine population in Japan. Instead, multiple introductions of 1A.3.3.2 A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses from humans have affected the Japanese swine population. As has been reported throughout the world, A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses repeatedly became introduced into swine in Japan and then reassorted with endemic IAVs-S (25–37). Frequent introductions of 1A.3.3.2 A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses occurred on Hokkaido, mainland Japan, and Kyushu. Consequently, 1A.3.3.2 A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses that became introduced into the swine population and reassorted with Japanese endemic H1N2 IAVs-S were observed in Niigata prefecture. All cases of the isolation of 1A.3.3.2 A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses were sporadic, except for those from farms in Niigata prefecture, where H1N2 IAVs-S possessing 1A.3.3.2 A(H1N1)pdm09 HA genes persisted from May 2017 to May 2019. In a previous study, experimental infection of pigs with 5 IAVs-S of 3 subtypes (H1N1, H1N2, and H3N2), followed by cohousing, yielded H1N2 IAVs-S that were more viable than other subtypes (46). Although the epidemiologic and genetic background in the previous experiment differed from those in our current study, circulation in the pig population in Niigata prefecture might have selected H1N2 IAVs-S with increased stability and viability.
IAVs-S with an H3 HA gene of human seasonal strains have been reported sporadically in Japan (33, 40, 41), but the current situation differs from that during 1970 to 2013. H3N2 IAVs-S derived from human seasonal influenza viruses were isolated in Hokkaido in 1985, Ehime in 2002, and Osaka in 2007 (47). However, no descendant strains have been isolated subsequently, suggesting that these H3N2 IAVs-S have disappeared without becoming established within the Japanese pig population. In contrast, the remaining H3N2 IAVs-S that inherited the HA gene from the human 1999–2000 seasonal lineage, including those we collected in our current study, were isolated in 2013 (40) and from diagnostic specimens submitted from Miyazaki prefecture, Kyushu. Subsequent strains carrying HAs of the same lineage were isolated in 2017, 2018, and 2019 in Kyushu and Chiba prefectures (Fig. 2B). This finding suggests that H3N2 IAVs-S harboring the earlier-mentioned lineage of the HA gene adapted to swine well enough to become established within the Japanese pig population. One possible mechanism of this adaptation is that these H3N2 IAVs-S acquired internal genes derived from A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses. A previous study demonstrated that an avian H9N2 influenza virus adapted better to pigs when the internal genes were replaced by those from A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses (48). This possibility should be further explored concerning the H3N2 IAVs-S currently circulating in Japan.
Vaccination is one of the most frequently implemented strategies to control IAV-S on farms. However, the vaccine will be ineffective when the vaccine strain and field strains differ in antigenicity; when mutations occur at antigenic sites of the HA gene in a field strain of IAV-S that is of the same lineage as a vaccine strain; or when a virus possessing HA of a different lineage from the vaccine strain circulates in the field (49). The vaccine strains available in Japan were derived from isolates in the 1960s to 1970s, which are phylogenetically distinct from IAVs-S currently circulating in Japan. Therefore, vaccine strains need to be updated to combat classical swine H1, human seasonal H3, and 1A.3.3.2 A(H1N1)pdm09 and, thus, effectively control the current IAV-S situation in Japan. Further, current vaccination coverage against IAV-S of Japanese swine is, at most, about 10%. This is partially because swine influenza is not regarded as a critical or notifiable disease in Japan.
Multiple introductions of IAVs-S with the same subtype but different lineages of the HA genes might have contributed to the long-term isolation of IAVs-S on farms 001 and 007, as we previously suggested (37). The level of immunity to a particular strain of IAV-S against experimentally infected IAVs-S might be high enough to hamper reinfection for approximately 100 days (50). If the same was true for farm levels, the herd immunity achieved against preexisting IAVs-S could suppress the prevalence of preexisting IAVs-S for several months. However, it could not prevent a newly introduced IAV-S, providing that the newly introduced virus expresses an HA protein of different antigenicity from that of the preexisting one. This mechanism might be a factor in the long-term isolation of IAVs-S from a farm, such as farms 001 and 007; however, the occurrence of substitutions that are considered to influence the antigenicity of the HA proteins at positions 155 (51, 52) and 185 (53) could be another persistence-associated factor. On farm 012, glutamic acid 155 (Sa site) in the HA protein was shared by IAVs-S from November 2015 to July 2016 and then was replaced by glycine in the IAVs-S collected from October 2016 to February 2019. Likewise, along with one amino acid substitution at the antigenic site (168 on Ca1 site), aspartic acid at position 185 (Sb site) in the HA protein was shared among IAVs-S from November 2015 to April 2017 and then was replaced by asparagine in the IAVs-S from October 2017 to May 2019 on farm 006 (see Table S3 in the supplemental material). Single mutations at positions 145, 155, 156, 158, 159, 189, and 193 that are adjacent to the receptor binding site of the human H3 HA protein greatly reduced reactivity against serum obtained from ferrets infected with a wild-type strain (54). Of these 7 mutations, the single mutation at position 145 on H3 HA protein among IAVs-S also reduced reactivity against serum obtained from pigs infected with a wild-type strain (55). Likewise, in the present study, the single mutation at position 155 on H1 HA protein, which corresponds to 158 on H3 HA protein, might be critical for the altered antigenicity, enabling the variant to evade immunity against the previous strain on the farm. However, demonstration of an effect of lineage replacement and substitution at the antigenic site on the antigenicity of the HA protein is necessary to prove this hypothesis.
In summary, our phylogenetic analysis reveals the current situation of IAVs-S in Japan and the genetic evolution of IAVs-S on various farms. Whereas the 1A.1 classical swine H1 IAVs-S and human seasonal H3 IAVs-S have become established among pig populations in Japan, 1A.3.3.2 A(H1N1)pdm09 IAVs-S have become introduced repeatedly from the human population. Therefore, IAVs-S surveillance should be continued to understand the status of IAVs-S among the pig population in Japan and to support vaccine strategies compatible with the current situation in Japan.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sample collection.
Through active surveillance efforts during 2015 through 2019, we collected 7,133 nasal swabs from pigs in various age groups at farms in Japan. During the same period, nasal swab samples and lung tissue samples collected from pigs suspected to have swine influenza were transferred from prefectural animal hygiene centers to the National Institute of Animal Health, Japan, for diagnosis. Through active and passive surveillance, we collected samples from 21 of all 47 prefectures. Nasal swabs collected through active surveillance were put promptly into minimum essential medium containing penicillin (1,000 U/ml), streptomycin (1,000 μg/ml), amphotericin B (25 μg/ml), HEPES (0.01 M), and 0.5% bovine serum albumin and were kept on ice packs until transport to the National Institute of Animal Health, Japan. There, the swabs were removed and the medium aliquoted and stored at –80°C until virus isolation. From each sample, 200 μl was used for RNA extraction and virus detection.
Virus detection and isolation.
RNA was extracted from swab samples by using RNeasy minikits (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), as described previously (32, 56). The extracted RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA by using Superscript III (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and universal primers for influenza A virus (57). This cDNA was the template for real-time PCR analysis using SYBR premix Ex Taq (TaKaRa Bio, Shiga, Japan) with primers specific for the matrix protein (MP) gene, as described previously (58), or the MP gene was detected using an AgPath-ID one-step reverse transcription-PCR kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with primers and probes according to the diagnostic manual of the CSIRO Australian Animal Health Laboratory (59, 60). For virus isolation, media from nasal swabs that were virus positive according to real-time PCR analysis were filtered (pore size, 0.45 μm; Millipore, Danvers, MA, USA) and inoculated into cultures of floating MDCK cells, 9- to 11-day-old embryonated chicken eggs, or primary cultures of porcine alveolar epithelial cells, as previously reported (47, 61). The supernatants of these cell cultures were used in HA assays (68) with guinea pig erythrocytes.
Genomic sequencing and phylogenetic analysis.
All gene segments of isolated viruses were sequenced by using next-generation sequencing; consensus sequences were generated and the HA and NA genes of each isolate were subtyped by using FluGAS software as described previously (37). Briefly, the output paired-end reads from the MiSeq second-generation sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) were mapped to reference sequences that were selected from a search of the Influenza Virus Database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) by using the FluGAS algorithm; this was followed by the construction of a consensus sequence when at least 3 reads were available. A single nucleotide was adopted when its representation exceeded 51% at that site, whereas mixed-base codes were adopted when multiple bases each accounted for at least 15% of the total coverage at the site. The nucleotide sequences of the IAVs-S analyzed here have been deposited in the GISAID EpiFlu database; isolate identifier numbers are listed in Table S4 in the supplemental material. For phylogenetic analyses, all H1 and H3 HA genes and N1 and N2 NA genes in the GISAID database were downloaded in September 2019. The sequences of the IAVs-S isolated here and the downloaded sequences from GISAID were aligned by using BioEdit (62) and MAFFT (63). Maximum likelihood trees based on aligned sequences (H1, 55,345; H3, 68,720; N1, 56,555; and N2, 70,938 strains) were constructed by using FastTree, version 2.1.10 (64), and clusters containing Japanese IAVs-S with fast-global bootstrap values of 90 or greater were further analyzed.
To calculate molecular estimates of divergence times from ancestral IAVs for selected clusters containing HA and NA genes of IAVs-S, maximum clade credibility trees were constructed as previously reported (65).
Sequences for the polymerase basic protein 1 (PB1) genes of IAVs isolated from humans (55,504 strains) and swine (5,793 strains) were downloaded from the GISAID database, and nonredundant sets of human and swine sequences were produced by using CD-HIT software (66) at an identity threshold of 99.5%. Other gene segments of strains selected as described earlier (human, 1,475 strains; swine, 2,056 strains) were used for constructing maximum likelihood trees. A/swine/Gunma/10-1636/2016 was removed from the analysis, because several gene segments included many mixed bases, indicating that this isolate can be considered a mixture of two IAVs-S. Tanglegrams were constructed from the maximum likelihood trees for individual genes by using Dendroscope 3 (67).
Data availability.
See Table S4 for a complete list of the EpiFlu accession numbers of the IAVs-S in the present study.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the JRA Livestock Promotion Project (FY2015–2017) and was conducted under the research project “Development of the Management Technologies for the Risk of Introduction of Livestock Infectious Diseases and Their Wildlife-Borne Spread in Japan,” which was funded by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries of Japan (FY 2018–2022).
We thank Miwa Takahashi and Sayuri Nakamura for their excellent technical assistance. We thank all of the pig farmers who participated in this study and members for supporting the collection of pig nasal swabs. All of the analyses involving the FastTree and BEAST software package were conducted by using the supercomputer of AFFRIT, MAFF, Japan.
Footnotes
Supplemental material is available online only.
REFERENCES
- 1.Vincent A, Awada L, Brown I, Chen H, Claes F, Dauphin G, Donis R, Culhane M, Hamilton K, Lewis N, Mumford E, Nguyen T, Parchariyanon S, Pasick J, Pavade G, Pereda A, Peiris M, Saito T, Swenson S, Van Reeth K, Webby R, Wong F, Ciacci-Zanella J. 2014. Review of influenza A virus in swine worldwide: a call for increased surveillance and research. Zoonoses Public Health 61:4–17. doi: 10.1111/zph.12049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kitikoon P, Vincent AL, Jones KR, Nilubol D, Yu S, Janke BH, Thacker BJ, Thacker EL. 2009. Vaccine efficacy and immune response to swine influenza virus challenge in pigs infected with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus at the time of SIV vaccination. Vet Microbiol 139:235–244. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bennett R, Ijpelaar J. 2005. Updated estimates of the costs associated with thirty four endemic livestock diseases in Great Britain: a note. J Agric Econ 56:135–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2005.tb00126.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.FAO. 2009. The human influenza due to a novel subtype H1N1. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy: http://www.fao.org/3/a-ak061e.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ito T, Couceiro JN, Kelm S, Baum LG, Krauss S, Castrucci MR, Donatelli I, Kida H, Paulson JC, Webster RG, Kawaoka Y. 1998. Molecular basis for the generation in pigs of influenza A viruses with pandemic potential. J Virol 72:7367–7373. doi: 10.1128/JVI.72.9.7367-7373.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ma W, Lager KM, Vincent AL, Janke BH, Gramer MR, Richt JA. 2009. The role of swine in the generation of novel influenza viruses. Zoonoses Public Health 56:326–337. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01217.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Brown IH. 2000. The epidemiology and evolution of influenza viruses in pigs. Vet Microbiol 74:29–46. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1135(00)00164-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zell R, Scholtissek C, Ludwig S. 2013. Genetics, evolution, and the zoonotic capacity of European swine influenza viruses. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 370:29–55. doi: 10.1007/82_2012_267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhu H, Webby R, Lam TT, Smith DK, Peiris JS, Guan Y. 2013. History of swine influenza viruses in Asia. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 370:57–68. doi: 10.1007/82_2011_179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Guan Y, Shortridge KF, Krauss S, Li PH, Kawaoka Y, Webster RG. 1996. Emergence of avian H1N1 influenza viruses in pigs in China. J Virol 70:8041–8046. doi: 10.1128/JVI.70.11.8041-8046.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Takemae N, Parchariyanon S, Damrongwatanapokin S, Uchida Y, Ruttanapumma R, Watanabe C, Yamaguchi S, Saito T. 2008. Genetic diversity of swine influenza viruses isolated from pigs during 2000 to 2005 in Thailand. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2:181–189. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2008.00062.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Poonsuk S, Sangthong P, Petcharat N, Lekcharoensuk P. 2013. Genesis and genetic constellations of swine influenza viruses in Thailand. Vet Microbiol 167:314–326. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nonthabenjawan N, Chanvatik S, Chaiyawong S, Jairak W, Boonyapisusopha S, Tuanudom R, Thontiravong A, Bunpapong N, Amonsin A. 2015. Genetic diversity of swine influenza viruses in Thai swine farms, 2011-2014. Virus Genes 50:221–230. doi: 10.1007/s11262-014-1153-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Abe H, Mine J, Parchariyanon S, Takemae N, Boonpornprasert P, Ubonyaem N, Patcharasinghawut P, Nuansrichay B, Tanikawa T, Tsunekuni R, Saito T. 2015. Co-infection of influenza A viruses of swine contributes to effective shuffling of gene segments in a naturally reared pig. Virology 484:203–212. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2015.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lee JH, Pascua PN, Decano AG, Kim SM, Park SJ, Kwon HI, Kim EH, Kim YI, Kim H, Kim SY, Song MS, Jang HK, Park BK, Choi YK. 2015. Evaluation of the zoonotic potential of a novel reassortant H1N2 swine influenza virus with gene constellation derived from multiple viral sources. Infect Genet Evol 34:378–393. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2015.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Takemae N, Nguyen PT, Le VT, Nguyen TN, To TL, Nguyen TD, Pham VP, Vo HV, Le QVT, Do HT, Nguyen DT, Uchida Y, Saito T. 2018. Appearance of reassortant European avian-origin H1 influenza A viruses of swine in Vietnam. Transbound Emerg Dis 65:1110–1116. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kundin WD. 1970. Hong Kong A-2 influenza virus infection among swine during a human epidemic in Taiwan. Nature 228:857. doi: 10.1038/228857a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tumova B, Mensik J, Stumpa A, Fedova D, Pospisil Z. 1976. Serological evidence and isolation of a virus closely related to the human A/Hong Kong/68 (H3N2) strain in swine populations in Czechoslovakia in 1969-1972. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B 23:590–563. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shortridge KF, Webster RG. 1979. Geographical distribution of swine (Hsw1N1) and Hong Kong (H3N2) influenza virus variants in pigs in Southeast Asia. Intervirology 11:9–15. doi: 10.1159/000149006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nerome K, Ishida M, Nakayama M, Oya A, Kanai C, Suwicha K. 1981. Antigenic and genetic analysis of A/Hong Kong (H3N2) influenza viruses isolated from swine and man. J Gen Virol 56:441–445. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-56-2-441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ottis K, Sidoli L, Bachmann PA, Webster RG, Kaplan MM. 1982. Human influenza A viruses in pigs: isolation of a H3N2 strain antigenically related to A/England/42/72 and evidence for continuous circulation of human viruses in the pig population. Arch Virol 73:103–108. doi: 10.1007/bf01314719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhou NN, Senne DA, Landgraf JS, Swenson SL, Erickson G, Rossow K, Liu L, Yoon K, Krauss S, Webster RG. 1999. Genetic reassortment of avian, swine, and human influenza A viruses in American pigs. J Virol 73:8851–8856. doi: 10.1128/JVI.73.10.8851-8856.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Garten RJ, Davis CT, Russell CA, Shu B, Lindstrom S, Balish A, Sessions WM, Xu X, Skepner E, Deyde V, Okomo-Adhiambo M, Gubareva L, Barnes J, Smith CB, Emery SL, Hillman MJ, Rivailler P, Smagala J, de Graaf M, Burke DF, Fouchier RAM, Pappas C, Alpuche-Aranda CM, López-Gatell H, Olivera H, López I, Myers CA, Faix D, Blair PJ, Yu C, Keene KM, Dotson PD, Boxrud D, Sambol AR, Abid SH, St George K, Bannerman T, Moore AL, Stringer DJ, Blevins P, Demmler-Harrison GJ, Ginsberg M, Kriner P, Waterman S, Smole S, Guevara HF, Belongia EA, Clark PA, Beatrice ST, Donis R, Katz J, Finelli L, Bridges CB, Shaw M, Jernigan DB, Uyeki TM, Smith DJ, Klimov AI, Cox NJ. 2009. Antigenic and genetic characteristics of swine-origin 2009 A(H1N1) influenza viruses circulating in humans. Science 325:197–201. doi: 10.1126/science.1176225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Smith GJ, Vijaykrishna D, Bahl J, Lycett SJ, Worobey M, Pybus OG, Ma SK, Cheung CL, Raghwani J, Bhatt S, Peiris JS, Guan Y, Rambaut A. 2009. Origins and evolutionary genomics of the 2009 swine-origin H1N1 influenza A epidemic. Nature 459:1122–1125. doi: 10.1038/nature08182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sreta D, Tantawet S, Na Ayudhya SN, Thontiravong A, Wongphatcharachai M, Lapkuntod J, Bunpapong N, Tuanudom R, Suradhat S, Vimolket L, Poovorawan Y, Thanawongnuwech R, Amonsin A, Kitikoon P. 2010. Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus on commercial swine farm, Thailand. Emerg Infect Dis 16:1587–1590. doi: 10.3201/eid1610.100665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Vijaykrishna D, Poon LL, Zhu HC, Ma SK, Li OT, Cheung CL, Smith GJ, Peiris JS, Guan Y. 2010. Reassortment of pandemic H1N1/2009 influenza A virus in swine. Science 328:1529. doi: 10.1126/science.1189132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ducatez MF, Hause B, Stigger-Rosser E, Darnell D, Corzo C, Juleen K, Simonson R, Brockwell-Staats C, Rubrum A, Wang D, Webb A, Crumpton JC, Lowe J, Gramer M, Webby RJ. 2011. Multiple reassortment between pandemic (H1N1) 2009 and endemic influenza viruses in pigs, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 17:1624–1629. doi: 10.3201/eid1709.110338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Howard WA, Essen SC, Strugnell BW, Russell C, Barass L, Reid SM, Brown IH. 2011. Reassortant Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus in pigs, United Kingdom. Emerg Infect Dis 17:1049–1052. doi: 10.3201/eid/1706.101886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kitikoon P, Sreta D, Na Ayudhya SN, Wongphatcharachai M, Lapkuntod J, Prakairungnamthip D, Bunpapong N, Suradhat S, Thanawongnuwech R, Amonsin A. 2011. Brief report: molecular characterization of a novel reassorted pandemic H1N1 2009 in Thai pigs. Virus Genes 43:1–5. doi: 10.1007/s11262-011-0597-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lam TT, Zhu H, Wang J, Smith DK, Holmes EC, Webster RG, Webby R, Peiris JM, Guan Y. 2011. Reassortment events among swine influenza A viruses in China: implications for the origin of the 2009 influenza pandemic. J Virol 85:10279–10285. doi: 10.1128/JVI.05262-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Moreno A, Di Trani L, Faccini S, Vaccari G, Nigrelli D, Boniotti MB, Falcone E, Boni A, Chiapponi C, Sozzi E, Cordioli P. 2011. Novel H1N2 swine influenza reassortant strain in pigs derived from the pandemic H1N1/2009 virus. Vet Microbiol 149:472–477. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hiromoto Y, Parchariyanon S, Ketusing N, Netrabukkana P, Hayashi T, Kobayashi T, Takemae N, Saito T. 2012. Isolation of the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus and its reassortant with an H3N2 swine influenza virus from healthy weaning pigs in Thailand in 2011. Virus Res 169:175–181. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2012.07.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kirisawa R, Ogasawara Y, Yoshitake H, Koda A, Furuya T. 2014. Genomic reassortants of pandemic A (H1N1) 2009 virus and endemic porcine H1 and H3 viruses in swine in Japan. J Vet Med Sci 76:1457–1470. doi: 10.1292/jvms.14-0194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kanehira K, Takemae N, Uchida Y, Hikono H, Saito T. 2014. Reassortant swine influenza viruses isolated in Japan contain genes from pandemic A(H1N1) 2009. Microbiol Immunol 58:327–341. doi: 10.1111/1348-0421.12152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Diaz A, Marthaler D, Culhane M, Sreevatsan S, Alkhamis M, Torremorell M. 2017. Complete genome sequencing of influenza A viruses within swine farrow-to-wean farms reveals the emergence, persistence, and subsidence of diverse viral genotypes. J Virol 91:e00745-17. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00745-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gao S, Anderson TK, Walia RR, Dorman KS, Janas-Martindale A, Vincent AL. 2017. The genomic evolution of H1 influenza A viruses from swine detected in the United States between 2009 and 2016. J Gen Virol 98:2001–2010. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mine J, Abe H, Parchariyanon S, Boonpornprasert P, Ubonyaem N, Nuansrichay B, Takemae N, Tanikawa T, Tsunekuni R, Uchida Y, Saito T. 2019. Genetic and antigenic dynamics of influenza A viruses of swine on pig farms in Thailand. Arch Virol 164:457–472. doi: 10.1007/s00705-018-4091-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yamane N, Arikawa J, Odagiri T, Ishida N. 1979. Annual examination of influenza virus infection among pigs in Miyagi prefecture, Japan: the appearance of Hsw1N1 virus. Acta Virol 23:240–248. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sugimura T, Yonemochi H, Ogawa T, Tanaka Y, Kumagai T. 1980. Isolation of a recombinant influenza virus (Hsw 1 N2) from swine in Japan. Arch Virol 66:271–274. doi: 10.1007/bf01314741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ozawa M, Matsuu A, Yonezawa K, Igarashi M, Okuya K, Kawabata T, Ito K, Tsukiyama-Kohara K, Taneno A, Deguchi E. 2015. Efficient isolation of Swine influenza viruses by age-targeted specimen collection. J Clin Microbiol 53:1331–1338. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02941-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Okuya K, Matsuu A, Kawabata T, Koike F, Ito M, Furuya T, Taneno A, Akimoto S, Deguchi E, Ozawa M. 2018. Distribution of gene segments of the pandemic A(H1N1) 2009 virus lineage in pig populations. Transbound Emerg Dis 65:1502–1513. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ito T, Kawaoka Y, Vines A, Ishikawa H, Asai T, Kida H. 1998. Continued circulation of reassortant H1N2 influenza viruses in pigs in Japan. Arch Virol 143:1773–1782. doi: 10.1007/s007050050415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Saito T, Suzuki H, Maeda K, Inai K, Takemae N, Uchida Y, Tsunemitsu H. 2008. Molecular characterization of an H1N2 swine influenza virus isolated in Miyazaki, Japan, in 2006. J Vet Med Sci 70:423–427. doi: 10.1292/jvms.70.423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Yoneyama S, Hayashi T, Kojima H, Usami Y, Kubo M, Takemae N, Uchida Y, Saito T. 2010. Occurrence of a pig respiratory disease associated with swine influenza A (H1N2) virus in Tochigi Prefecture, Japan. J Vet Med Sci 72:481–488. doi: 10.1292/jvms.09-0342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Matsuu A, Uchida Y, Takemae N, Mawatari T, Yoneyama SK, Kasai T, Nakamura R, Eto M, Saito T. 2012. Genetic characterization of swine influenza viruses isolated in Japan between 2009 and 2012. Microbiol Immunol 56:792–803. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2012.00501.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ma J, Shen H, McDowell C, Liu Q, Duff M, Lee J, Lang Y, Hesse D, Richt JA, Ma W. 2019. Virus survival and fitness when multiple genotypes and subtypes of influenza A viruses exist and circulate in swine. Virology 532:30–38. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2019.03.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Takemae N, Nguyen T, Ngo LT, Hiromoto Y, Uchida Y, Pham VP, Kageyama T, Kasuo S, Shimada S, Yamashita Y, Goto K, Kubo H, Le VT, Van Vo H, Do HT, Nguyen DH, Hayashi T, Matsuu A, Saito T. 2013. Antigenic variation of H1N1, H1N2 and H3N2 swine influenza viruses in Japan and Vietnam. Arch Virol 158:859–876. doi: 10.1007/s00705-013-1616-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Mancera Gracia JC, Van den Hoecke S, Richt JA, Ma W, Saelens X, Van Reeth K. 2017. A reassortant H9N2 influenza virus containing 2009 pandemic H1N1 internal-protein genes acquired enhanced pig-to-pig transmission after serial passages in swine. Sci Rep 7:1323. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01512-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ryt-Hansen P, Pedersen AG, Larsen I, Krog JS, Kristensen CS, Larsen LE. 2019. Acute influenza A virus outbreak in an enzootic infected sow herd: impact on viral dynamics, genetic and antigenic variability and effect of maternally derived antibodies and vaccination. PLoS One 14:e0224854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sun H, Cunningham FL, Harris J, Xu Y, Long LP, Hanson-Dorr K, Baroch JA, Fioranelli P, Lutman MW, Li T, Pedersen K, Schmit BS, Cooley J, Lin X, Jarman RG, DeLiberto TJ, Wan XF. 2015. Dynamics of virus shedding and antibody responses in influenza A virus-infected feral swine. J Gen Virol 96:2569–2578. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Both GW, Shi CH, Kilbourne ED. 1983. Hemagglutinin of swine influenza virus: a single amino acid change pleiotropically affects viral antigenicity and replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 80:6996–7000. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.22.6996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Pulit-Penaloza JA, Jones J, Sun X, Jang Y, Thor S, Belser JA, Zanders N, Creager HM, Ridenour C, Wang L, Stark TJ, Garten R, Chen LM, Barnes J, Tumpey TM, Wentworth DE, Maines TR, Davis CT. 2018. Antigenically diverse swine origin H1N1 variant influenza viruses exhibit differential ferret pathogenesis and transmission phenotypes. J Virol 92:e00095-18. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00095-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Rajao DS, Anderson TK, Kitikoon P, Stratton J, Lewis NS, Vincent AL. 2018. Antigenic and genetic evolution of contemporary swine H1 influenza viruses in the United States. Virology 518:45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2018.02.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Koel BF, Burke DF, Bestebroer TM, van der Vliet S, Zondag GC, Vervaet G, Skepner E, Lewis NS, Spronken MI, Russell CA, Eropkin MY, Hurt AC, Barr IG, de Jong JC, Rimmelzwaan GF, Osterhaus AD, Fouchier RA, Smith DJ. 2013. Substitutions near the receptor binding site determine major antigenic change during influenza virus evolution. Science 342:976–979. doi: 10.1126/science.1244730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Santos JJS, Abente EJ, Obadan AO, Thompson AJ, Ferreri L, Geiger G, Gonzalez-Reiche AS, Lewis NS, Burke DF, Rajao DS, Paulson JC, Vincent AL, Perez DR. 2018. Plasticity of amino acid residue 145 near the receptor binding site of H3 swine influenza A viruses and its impact on receptor binding and antibody recognition. J Virol 93:e01413-18. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01413-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Takemae N, Parchariyanon S, Ruttanapumma R, Hiromoto Y, Hayashi T, Uchida Y, Saito T. 2011. Swine influenza virus infection in different age groups of pigs in farrow-to-finish farms in Thailand. Virol J 8:537. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-8-537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Huddleston JA, Brownlee GG. 1982. The sequence of the nucleoprotein gene of human influenza A virus, strain A/NT/60/68. Nucleic Acids Res 10:1029–1038. doi: 10.1093/nar/10.3.1029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ngo LT, Hiromoto Y, Pham VP, Le HT, Nguyen HT, Le VT, Takemae N, Saito T. 2012. Isolation of novel triple-reassortant swine H3N2 influenza viruses possessing the hemagglutinin and neuraminidase genes of a seasonal influenza virus in Vietnam in 2010. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 6:6–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00267.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Heine HG, Trinidad L, Selleck P, Lowther S. 2007. Rapid detection of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus by TaqMan reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Avian Dis 51:370–372. doi: 10.1637/7587-040206R.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Heine HG, Foord AJ, Wang J, Valdeter S, Walker S, Morrissy C, Wong FY, Meehan B. 2015. Detection of highly pathogenic zoonotic influenza virus H5N6 by reverse-transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Virol J 12:18. doi: 10.1186/s12985-015-0250-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Takemae N, Shobugawa Y, Nguyen PT, Nguyen T, Nguyen TN, To TL, Thai PD, Nguyen TD, Nguyen DT, Nguyen DK, Do HT, Le TQ, Hua PT, Van Vo H, Nguyen DT, Nguyen DH, Uchida Y, Saito R, Saito T. 2016. Effect of herd size on subclinical infection of swine in Vietnam with influenza A viruses. BMC Vet Res 12:227. doi: 10.1186/s12917-016-0844-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Hall TA. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Katoh K, Standley DM. 2016. A simple method to control over-alignment in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Bioinformatics 32:1933–1942. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. 2010. FastTree 2–approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 5:e9490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Mine J, Uchida Y, Nakayama M, Tanikawa T, Tsunekuni R, Sharshov K, Takemae N, Sobolev I, Shestpalov A, Saito T. 2019. Genetics and pathogenicity of H5N6 highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses isolated from wild birds and a chicken in Japan during winter 2017-2018. Virology 533:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2019.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Fu L, Niu B, Zhu Z, Wu S, Li W. 2012. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28:3150–3152. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Huson DH, Scornavacca C. 2012. Dendroscope 3: an interactive tool for rooted phylogenetic trees and networks. Syst Biol 61:1061–1067. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.WHO. 2002. WHO manual on animal diagnosis and surveillance. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland: http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/influenza/whocdscsrncs20025rev.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
See Table S4 for a complete list of the EpiFlu accession numbers of the IAVs-S in the present study.