Skip to main content
Critical Care logoLink to Critical Care
letter
. 2020 Jul 9;24:402. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03140-w

Double trouble: methanol outbreak in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic in Iran—a cross-sectional assessment

Hossein Hassanian-Moghaddam 1,2,, Nasim Zamani 1,2, Ali-Asghar Kolahi 1, Rebecca McDonald 3, Knut Erik Hovda 4
PMCID: PMC7344025  PMID: 32646475

Iran has been the epicenter of COVID-19 in the Middle East, with a total of 120,198 infected cases and 8556 deaths as of June 10 [1]. The pandemic has been complicated by the co-occurrence of a large methanol outbreak in Iran, seemingly triggered by false claims that consumption of disinfectants and alcohols could prevent and treat COVID-19 infection. According to local news, the ensuing rise in ethanol demand made bootleggers decolorate industrial alcohols containing pyridine (to deter from consumption) using bleach, before selling them as regular ethanol to Iranians.

In this research letter, we describe the scale of the Iranian methanol outbreak, based on hospitalization and mortality data collated from databases of the Iranian Ministry of Health (MOH) and Legal Medicine Organization (LMO) for the period of February 23 (first documented COVID-19 case in Iran) until May 2, 2020. MOH records indicate 5876 hospitalizations for methanol poisoning, occurring in geographical clusters, with just three (Tehran, Fars, Khuzestan) out of the total 31 Iranian provinces accounting for the majority (52.2%; n = 3068) of cases (see Table 1). In terms of mortality, MOH reported that 534 patients with methanol poisoning were confirmed dead in the hospital setting, equivalent to an estimated case fatality rate of approximately 9% (534/5876). LMO registered 800 deaths from methanol poisoning during the same period (see Table 1 and Fig. 1), comprising both in-hospital and community-based fatalities. This 33% discrepancy in deaths between MOH and LMO data (i.e., (800–534)/800 × 100) may have several explanations. For instance, LMO data also includes out-of-hospital deaths and is likely more accurate. Moreover, a hospital-based diagnosis of methanol poisoning is difficult and complicated by the lack of diagnostic equipment or physician knowledge. Therefore, methanol poisoning may go undetected in hospitals, and accurate diagnosis is—best case scenario—only assigned during a post-mortem examination, which then enters LMO statistics. In the absence of formate analyses, late presenters can become false negatives.

Table 1.

Methanol poisoning cases and fatalities in Iran (23 February to 2 May 2020)

Province Poisoning cases: hospital admissions (source: MOH) Methanol deaths*
In hospital (source: MOH) Total registered (source: LMO)
Tehran 1177 87 205
Khuzestan 1079 93 88
Fars 812 99 139
Razavi Khorasan 581 67 78
East Azerbaijan 483 50 75
Alborz 248 43 52
Ardebil 223 22 31
Isfahan 207 6 19
Kerman 139 0 2
Kermanshah 132 2 2
Mazandaran 100 10 28
Yazd 96 12 10
Markazi 87 4 4
Kurdestan 79 0 9
The other provinces 433 39 58
Total 5876 534 800

*Brain-dead cases considered dead

MOH Ministry of Health, LMO Legal Medicine Organization (data is available through https://bit.ly/2WUBfZo)

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Mortality by province based on LMO data

Despite these inconsistencies, the number of Iranian poisoning cases (5876 hospitalizations from late February until early May),\ is already five times higher than the second-largest methanol outbreak in history, which was recorded in Libya in March 2013 and affected 1066 patients [2].

From our data, it is unclear how many Iranians drank adulterated alcohol for recreational purposes or as gastrointestinal “disinfectant” to prevent—or treat—COVID-19 infection. With no end to the COVID-19 pandemic in sight, it is thus paramount to educate the general public that alcohol does not protect against COVID-19, as already initiated by the WHO [3]. The United Nations rightly recognizes the international spread of “fake news” related to COVID-19 as a threat to human lives [4], as health care systems have to contend with medical misinformation of the general public.

In methanol poisoning, the efficacy of treatment is markedly reduced in delayed presentations. With 534 methanol deaths registered by MOH and 800 deaths by LMO, alongside 5876 hospitalizations, we report an estimated mortality rate in the range of 9–14%. However, this figure is preliminary and should be interpreted with great caution, until LMO and MOH release their final data. Additionally, in many more non-fatal methanol poisoning cases, adults and children are now vision-impaired or blind from this toxic alcohol.

During situations like pandemics, healthcare institutions may seem dangerous settings, which could pose a risk of viral infection. It is possible that fear of COVID-19 kept methanol poisoning victims from seeking and obtaining timely care. This highlights the importance of early identification and initiation of treatment, which can be supplemented by “active case finding” by treating physicians and public health agencies [5]. Public health messaging and strategic planning are crucial to prevent future methanol outbreaks [6].

Acknowledgements

We want to acknowledge the novel initiative by Medécins sans Frontières (MSF/Doctors without Borders) which looks at mechanisms to improve the survival of methanol poisoning victims globally. Methanol poisoning is an under-recognized issue, especially in low- and middle-income countries. For more information on the work of MSF regarding methanol poisoning, please visit https://msf.no/mpi.

Authors’ contributions

HHM helped in the conception and design of the study. AAK, HHM, and NZ contributed to the data collection. NZ helped in writing the first draft. RM and KEH composed the final draft. All authors contributed to the final approval of the version to be submitted. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

Availability of data and materials

All the data is presented in the text.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study is a preliminary report and was approved by the ethics committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR.SBMU.RETECH.REC.1398.872).

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All the data is presented in the text.


Articles from Critical Care are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES