Skip to main content
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health logoLink to International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
. 2020 Jun 25;17(12):4568. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124568

Predicting the Epidemiological Outbreak of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Saudi Arabia

Dabiah Alboaneen 1,*, Bernardi Pranggono 2, Dhahi Alshammari 3, Nourah Alqahtani 1, Raja Alyaffer 1
PMCID: PMC7344859  PMID: 32630363

Abstract

The coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak continues to spread rapidly across the world and has been declared as pandemic by World Health Organization (WHO). Saudi Arabia was among the countries that was affected by the deadly and contagious virus. Using a real-time data from 2 March 2020 to 15 May 2020 collected from Saudi Ministry of Health, we aimed to give a local prediction of the epidemic in Saudi Arabia. We used two models: the Logistic Growth and the Susceptible-Infected-Recovered for real-time forecasting the confirmed cases of COVID-19 across Saudi Arabia. Our models predicted that the epidemics of COVID-19 will have total cases of 69,000 to 79,000 cases. The simulations also predicted that the outbreak will entering the final-phase by end of June 2020.

Keywords: 2019 novel coronavirus, COVID-19, Saudi Arabia, logistic growth model, SIR model

1. Introduction

Coronaviruses are a large family of viruses that are distributed among humans and animals such as livestock, birds, bats and other wild animals. These viruses cause serious illnesses for human when infecting respiratory, hepatic, gastrointestinal and neurological [1,2,3]. In December 2019, China notified the World Health Organization (WHO) about a novel coronavirus—severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)—that caused many cases of respiratory illnesses that were mostly related to people who had visited a live animal seafood market in Wuhan city [4]. The disease, now formally called COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019), caused an outbreak of a typical pneumonia through human-to-human transmission starting from Wuhan, a highly populated city with more than eleven million residents, then rapidly spread in China [5]. The Chinese authority put Wuhan city and several cities in Hubei province on lockdown, and all the public transportation was stopped to prevent any further spread of the virus [6,7]. However, the confirmed cases have increased daily in China and in many countries around the globe. On 11 March 2020, WHO officially declared COVID-19 outbreak as a global pandemic as the virus has spread to well over 200 countries around the world [8]. To date, COVID-19 has infected more than 4.5 million people and killed over 300,000 people across the world [8].

Saudi Arabia was among the countries that was affected by the virus. On 2 March 2020, the Saudi Ministry of Health reported the first confirmed COVID-19 case in the country. From the beginning of March, the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases gradually increased and the highest number of cases reported in one day was 2307 on 15 May 2020 with a total of 49,176 confirmed cases of COVID-19 infections and 292 deaths have been confirmed in Saudi Arabia (see Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Number of (a) confirmed, (b) recovered and (c) deaths cases related to COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia from 2 March 2020 to 15 May 2020.

Mathematical models and simulations are considered an important tools to predict the possibility and severity of disease outbreak and provide main information for determining the type and intensity of disease intervention. Resulting in decreasing the transmission of the diseases and a more accurate approaches to manage the epidemic. Recently, mathematical modeling has been used to predict epidemics such as Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD), SARS, Zika and Ebola [9,10,11,12].

This article aims to give a local prediction of the epidemic peak for COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia by using the real-time data from 2 March 2020 to 15 May 2020.

The remainder of this article is arranged as follows. Section 2 presents the related work on COVID-19. Section 3 describes data and the models used in prediction of the epidemic peak for COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia. Section 4 presents our simulation results. Finally, Section 5 draws the conclusion.

2. Related Work

In [13], a model called FPASSA-ANFIS was proposed to predict the number of the confirmed COVID-19 cases for the upcoming 10 days after previous cases until 8 February 2020 in China in order to take the right course of action. The main idea of the model was to enhance the performance of Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) using parameters from the output of FPASSA, namely, Flower Pollination Algorithm (FPA) and Salp Swarm Algorithm (SSA). The result of the model was outstanding with regards to Mean Absolute Percentage Error, Root Mean Squared Relative Error, Root Mean Squared Relative Error, and coefficient of determination (R2). Moreover, the proposed model was evaluated with two other data sets, and the result showed good performance.

In [14], the end and the infection turning point of the COVID-19 epidemic in China and Hubei Province were predicted. A proper model was used and parameterized with the latest data of the daily and total infections in Hubei and China from NHC. The model predicted the end of the epidemic to be after March 10 with 51,600 infections, while the daily case turning points were predicted to be between 1 and 6 February 2020.

Roosa et al. in [15] generated a real-time prediction of cumulative confirmed COVID-19 cases in Hubei and China in general for the few upcoming days after 5 and 9 February 2020. They used three phenomenological models that were previously utilized to predict the epidemics of several other diseases. These models were the Generalized Logistic Growth model, Richards model, and sub-epidemic wave model. The models predicted that the average number of the additional cases would be from 7409 to 7496 in Hubei and 1128 to 1929 in China. Moreover, they concluded that by the end of 24 February, the predicted cases would be from 37,415 to 38,028 in Hubei and 11,588 to 13,499 in China.

In [16], the Case Fatality Rate (CFR) for COVID-19 in China was measured. They collected the confirmed and death cases from 10 January to 3 February then applied simple statistics technique such as linear regression to find the estimation. They found that the CFR of novel COVID-19 is lower than those of the previous SARS-CoV and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (MERSCoV).

Batista in [17] predicted the final infection numbers of COVID-19 in China. The Logistic Growth model and classic Susceptible-Infected-Recovered (SIR) dynamic model were used with data from Worldmeters website. The model predicted that the final estimation of coronavirus epidemic will be approximately 83,700 cases.

In [18], a mathematical model was developed to predict the effects of implementing government restrictions to contain COVID-19 epidemic on the number of infection cases in China. The model showed that the number of infection cases decreased if high restrictions are taken earlier instead of later.

When the novel COVID-19 started to spread in China in the first half of January 2020, many cases went unreported. In [19], a model was generated to estimate the real number of unreported cases with the help of existing information from the Serial Intervals (SI) of infection caused by the two previous coronaviruses (SARS and MERS). The model results showed that the unreported cases from 1 to 15 January 2020 were approximately 469 cases. In addition, they found that the cases increased by 21-fold after 17 January 2020. Moreover, in [20], they proposed a statistical model to estimate the rate of COVID-19 cases in China. In this model, they used the data of the evacuated Japanese citizens from Wuhan from 29 to 31 January 2020. The model estimated the infection rate to be 9.5, and the death rate to be from 0.3 to 0.6. The Japanese citizens totaled 565, and this number is insufficient to estimate an accurate rate.

In [21], the risk of transmission of COVID-19 was estimated. They proposed a model based on clinical information of the disease and confirmed cases of individuals. The estimated result of the reproduction number was higher than 6.47. In addition, the model predicted the confirmed cases in seven days (23 to 29 January 2020).

Thompson in [22] developed a mathematical model to estimate the sustained human-to-human transmission. The data of 47 patients were used, and the estimated result showed that the transmission rate is 0.4. Moreover, the transmission is only 0.012 in case the symptoms have not yet manifested in half of the tested data.

In [23], they proposed a model to estimate the COVID-19 death risk based on the data of 20 cases reported by 24 January 2020. Two different scenarios were estimated, and the results are 5.1 and 8.4. Moreover, the estimation of the reproduction for both scenarios are 2.1 and 3.2. The results indicated that the COVID-19 epidemic could become a pandemic.

3. Methodology

3.1. Data

We collected the daily number of confirmed, recovered, and deaths COVID-19 cases released by Saudi Ministry of Health’s Twitter account from 2 March 2020 to 15 May 2020 to construct a real-time database. The data were organized in a matrix with the rows representing the date and columns representing the number of the new confirmed cases, the number of accumulated cases, the number of accumulated recovered cases and the number of accumulated deaths cases as shown in Table 1 and Table 2.

Table 1.

Number of cases in Saudi Arabia from 2 March 2020 to 15 April 2020.

Date New Accumulated Confirmed Accumulated Recovered Accumulated Deaths
2/3/2020 1 1 1 0
4/3/2020 1 2 0 0
5/3/2020 3 5 0 0
6/3/2020 2 7 0 0
7/3/2020 4 11 0 0
8/3/2020 4 15 0 0
9/3/2020 5 20 0 0
10/3/2020 1 21 1 0
11/3/2020 24 45 0 0
12/3/2020 17 62 0 0
13/3/2020 24 86 1 0
14/3/2020 17 103 1 0
15/3/2020 15 118 2 0
16/3/2020 15 133 2 0
17/3/2020 38 171 0 0
18/3/2020 67 238 6 0
19/3/2020 36 274 8 0
20/3/2020 70 344 8 0
21/3/2020 48 392 16 0
22/3/2020 119 511 17 0
23/3/2020 51 562 19 0
24/3/2020 205 767 28 1
25/3/2020 133 900 29 2
26/3/2020 112 1012 33 3
27/3/2020 92 1104 35 3
28/3/2020 99 1203 37 4
29/3/2020 96 1299 66 8
30/3/2020 154 1453 115 8
31/3/2020 110 1563 165 10
1/4/2020 157 1720 264 16
2/4/2020 165 1885 328 21
3/4/2020 154 2039 351 25
4/4/2020 140 2179 420 29
5/4/2020 206 2385 488 34
6/4/2020 138 2523 551 38
7/4/2020 272 2795 615 41
8/4/2020 137 2932 631 41
9/4/2020 355 3287 666 44
10/4/2020 364 3651 685 47
11/4/2020 382 4033 720 52
12/4/2020 429 4462 761 59
13/4/2020 472 4934 805 65
14/4/2020 435 5369 889 73
15/4/2020 493 5862 931 79

Table 2.

Number of cases in Saudi Arabia from 16 April 2020 to 15 May 2020.

Date New Accumulated Confirmed Accumulated Recovered Accumulated Deaths
16/4/2020 518 6380 990 83
17/4/2020 762 7142 1049 87
18/4/2020 1132 8274 1329 92
19/4/2020 1088 9362 1398 97
20/4/2020 1122 10,484 1490 103
21/4/2020 1147 11,631 1640 109
22/4/2020 1141 12,772 1812 114
23/4/2020 1158 13,930 1925 121
24/4/2020 1172 15,102 2049 127
25/4/2020 1197 16,299 2215 136
26/4/2020 1223 17,522 2357 139
27/4/2020 1289 18,811 2531 144
28/4/2020 1266 20,077 2784 152
29/4/2020 1325 21,402 2953 157
30/4/2020 1351 22,753 3163 162
1/5/2020 1344 24,097 3555 169
2/5/2020 1362 25,459 3765 176
3/5/2020 1552 27,011 4134 184
4/5/2020 1645 28,656 4476 191
5/5/2020 1595 30,251 5431 200
6/5/2020 1687 31,938 6783 209
7/5/2020 1793 33,731 7798 219
8/5/2020 1701 35,432 9120 229
9/5/2020 1704 37,136 10,144 239
10/5/2020 1912 39,048 11,457 246
11/5/2020 1966 41,014 12,737 255
12/5/2020 1911 42,925 15,257 264
13/5/2020 1905 44,830 17,622 273
14/5/2020 2039 46,869 19,051 283
15/5/2020 2307 49,176 21,869 292

3.2. Models

We generated short-term forecasts in real-time using two models namely, the Logistic Growth and SIR models.

3.2.1. Logistic Growth Model

The phenomenological Logistic Growth model has been widely used to model population growth with limited resources and space. The model was originally developed by Haberman in [24] and have been used to predict 2015 Ebola epidemic [11,12]. The dynamics of the epidemic, typically expressed as a cumulative number of cases, can use the similar model when the primary method of control is quarantine—as in the case of a novel viral infection such as COVID-19.

In the Logistic Growth model, the epidemic can be defined by the differential equation

dCdt=rC1CK, (1)

where C is the cumulative cases at time t, r is the early growth rate, and K is the final epidemic size.

3.2.2. Susceptible-Infected-Recovered Model

For comparison, we also simulate the well-known SIR model to represent the spreading process of COVID-19 epidemic in Saudi Arabia. SIR model framework is an epidemic spreading model inspired by the seminal work of Kermack and McKendric [25]. In epidemiology, SIR model is belong to compartmental epidemic models. The basic in compartmental epidemic model is proposed by Hamer in 1906 where he suggested that the infection spread should depend on the number of susceptible population and the number of infected population [26].

We estimate the parameters of model to get a best fit on reported data of COVID-19 outbreak in Saudi Arabia. In SIR model, we assume that the modeling timescale is short, no vital dynamics (births and deaths), and the host population size (N) is constant. In SIR-type models, individuals are classified into three separate groups (or compartments) based on their infectious status:

  • Susceptible (S): group of individuals that not currently infected but may catch the disease.

  • Infected (I): group of individuals that are currently infectious.

  • Recovered or Removed (R): group of individuals that are no longer infectious. They are either recovered, become immune, or have died.

The SIR model is represented by the following system of nonlinear Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs) [27]:

dSdt=βSIN (2)
dIdt=βSINγI (3)
dRdt=γI (4)

where t is time (in day), β is the contact rate, gamma is the remove rate or the inverse of infectious period, S(t) is the number of susceptible population at time t, I(t) is the number of infected population at time t, and R(t) is the number of recovered population at time t (see Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

SIR model.

In the SIR model, one key parameter to understand the basic epidemiological characteristics of the epidemic is the basic reproduction number (R0). R0 is the average number of secondary persons in a complete susceptible population infected by a single infected person during its spreading life. It indicates how contagious is the infectious diseases. The true value of R0 is uncertain until the outbreak is over. R0 depends on three factors:

  • Duration of infectiousness;

  • Probability of infection being transmitted during contact between an infected person and a susceptible person;

  • The average rate of contact between infected and susceptible individuals.

R0 is represented as

R0=βγ (5)

when R0 > 1 virus is currently spreading in the population and when R0 < 1 virus is stop spreading due to run out of susceptible and the decrease of new cases.

4. Results

4.1. Results of Logistic Growth Model

We used MATLAB to simulate the Logistic Growth and SIR model based on [17,28] models. In the epidemic simulation graphs, regions color separate epidemic into three phases:

  • Red: fast growth phase;

  • Yellow: transition to steady-state phase;

  • Green: ending phase (plateau stage).

The Logistic Growth model results of COVID-19 epidemic in Saudi Arabia are shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

COVID-19 epidemic in Saudi Arabia prediction based on Logistic Growth model.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

COVID-19 epidemic in Saudi Arabia prediction based on Logistic Growth model (infection rate).

The simulation is data-driven which is rely on the historical time-series data. From the simulations, it is shown that the Logistic Growth prediction is more optimistic compare to the other models. From the Logistic Growth model prediction, the peak of the infection rate is 7 May 2020 (see Figure 3). The transition to steady-state phase starts on 28 May 2020 and the ending phase starts on 14 June 2020. The Logistic Growth model predicts that final number of case is around 69,000 cases.

4.2. Results of Susceptible-Infected-Recovered Model

Several assumptions were taken in the simulation of SIR model: constant total population, uniform mixing of the people, and equally likely recovery of infected. The SIR model of COVID-19 epidemic simulation in Saudi Arabia are shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

COVID-19 epidemic in Saudi Arabia prediction based on SIR model.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

COVID-19 epidemic in Saudi Arabia prediction based on SIR model (infection rate).

In SIR-model the parameters β and γ are estimated from the actual number of confirmed cases. The variable R0 changes with respect to time. It will change every day based on the number of cases confirmed. From the SIR-model prediction, the peak of the infection rate is 1 May 2020. The transition to steady-state phase starts on 2 June 2020 and the ending phase starts on 24 June 2020. The SIR-model predict that final number of case is around 79,000 cases.

5. Conclusions

Predicting the epidemic evolution based on limited data and with no past epidemiological data is not trivial task. We present predictions for reported cases of COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia from 2 March to 15 May 2020 using mathematical modeling and simulation. We used two models: Logistic Growth and SIR models. Across both predictions, Logistic Growth and SIR-model provide different results (Figure 3 and Figure 5). Both models are similar in predicting the epidemic trends but with a slightly different timing, the SIR model predicts about a few days late than the Logistic Growth. Both models also have a gap in predicting the final number of cases with SIR model has a higher number of cases compared to the Logistic Growth.

In conclusion, while our models predict the COVID-19 outbreak in Saudi Arabia still in fast growth phase, our predictions need to be interpreted with caution given the dynamic case definition and reporting patterns. Without mass testing, the confirmed case number might be only a subset of the true total infected cases. Also, the asymptomatic infected individuals who are not tested and then recovered do not get counted. Under-reporting and asymptomatic people are observed in many countries worldwide and may lead to under-estimation of the accumulated cases. Therefore, mass testing is needed to identify patients and to contain the spread of the disease. Our prediction based on current data suggests that the epidemic continue to spreading in Saudi Arabia. It is suggested that warmer weather may contribute to slowing down the spread of coronavirus but this would need further investigation when more data is available. It should be noted that the MERS coronavirus has spread in Saudi Arabia in the summer (August) [29].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.A. (Dabiah Alboaneen); Data Collection: D.A. (Dabiah Alboaneen), D.A. (Dhahi Alshammari), R.A., N.A.; Analysis: D.A. (Dabiah Alboaneen), B.P.; Visualisation: B.P., D.A.(Dhahi Alshammari), D.A. (Dabiah Alboaneen); Writing—original draft preparation, D.A. (Dabiah Alboaneen), B.P., D.A.(Dhahi Alshammari), N.A, R.A.; Writing—review and editing, D.A. (Dabiah Alboaneen), B.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Chen Y., Liu Q., Guo D. Emerging coronaviruses: Genome structure, replication, and pathogenesis. J. Med. Virol. 2020;92:418–423. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ge X.Y., Li J.L., Yang X.L., Chmura A.A., Zhu G., Epstein J.H., Mazet J.K., Hu B., Zhang W., Peng C., et al. Isolation and characterization of a bat SARS-like coronavirus that uses the ACE2 receptor. Nature. 2013;503:535–538. doi: 10.1038/nature12711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wang L.F., Shi Z., Zhang S., Field H., Daszak P., Eaton B.T. Review of bats and SARS. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2006;12:1834. doi: 10.3201/eid1212.060401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Huang C., Wang Y., Li X., Ren L., Zhao J., Hu Y., Zhang L., Fan G., Xu J., Gu X., et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395:497–506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Du Z., Wang L., Cauchemez S., Xu X., Wang X., Cowling B.J., Meyers L.A. Risk for Transportation of 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) from Wuhan to Cities in China. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.01.28.20019299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wu J.T., Leung K., Leung G.M. Nowcasting and forecasting the potential domestic and international spread of the 2019-nCoV outbreak originating in Wuhan, China: A modelling study. Lancet. 2020;395:689–697. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30260-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.COVID-19 Coronavirus Pandemic. [(accessed on 17 April 2020)]; Available online: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
  • 9.Shanafelt D.W., Jones G., Lima M., Perrings C., Chowell G. Forecasting the 2001 foot-and-mouth disease epidemic in the UK. EcoHealth. 2018;15:338–347. doi: 10.1007/s10393-017-1293-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang W., Ruan S. Simulating the SARS outbreak in Beijing with limited data. J. Theor. Biol. 2004;227:369–379. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2003.11.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chowell G., Simonsen L., Viboud C., Kuang Y. Is West Africa approaching a catastrophic phase or is the 2014 Ebola epidemic slowing down? Different models yield different answers for Liberia. PLoS Curr. 2014;6 doi: 10.1371/currents.outbreaks.b4690859d91684da963dc40e00f3da81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pell B., Kuang Y., Viboud C., Chowell G. Using phenomenological models for forecasting the 2015 Ebola challenge. Epidemics. 2018;22:62–70. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2016.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Al-qaness M.A., Ewees A.A., Fan H., Abd El Aziz M. Optimization Method for Forecasting Confirmed Cases of COVID-19 in China. J. Clin. Med. 2020;9:674. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Li Q., Feng W. Trend and forecasting of the COVID-19 outbreak in China. arXiv. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.02.014.2002.05866 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Roosa K., Lee Y., Luo R., Kirpich A., Rothenberg R., Hyman J., Yan P., Chowell G. Real-time forecasts of the COVID-19 epidemic in China from February 5th to February 24th, 2020. Infect. Dis. Model. 2020;5:256–263. doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2020.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yang S., Cao P., Du P., Wu Z., Zhuang Z., Yang L., Yu X., Zhou Q., Feng X., Wang X., et al. Early estimation of the case fatality rate of COVID-19 in mainland China: A data-driven analysis. Ann. Transl. Med. 2020;8:128. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Batista M. Estimation of the final size of the COVID-19 epidemic. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.02.16.20023606. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liu Z., Magal P., Seydi O., Webb G. Predicting the cumulative number of cases for the COVID-19 epidemic in China from early data. arXiv. 2020 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3543148.2002.12298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhao S., Musa S.S., Lin Q., Ran J., Yang G., Wang W., Lou Y., Yang L., Gao D., He D., et al. Estimating the unreported number of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) cases in China in the first half of January 2020: A data-driven Modelling analysis of the early outbreak. J. Clin. Med. 2020;9:388. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nishiura H., Kobayashi T., Yang Y., Hayashi K., Miyama T., Kinoshita R., Linton N.M., Jung S.m., Yuan B., Suzuki A., et al. The rate of underascertainment of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infection: Estimation using Japanese passengers data on evacuation flights. J. Clin. Med. 2020;9:419. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tang B., Wang X., Li Q., Bragazzi N.L., Tang S., Xiao Y., Wu J. Estimation of the transmission risk of the 2019-nCoV and its implication for public health interventions. J. Clin. Med. 2020;9:462. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Thompson R.N. Novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China, 2020: Intense surveillance Is vital for preventing sustained transmission in new locations. J. Clin. Med. 2020;9:498. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jung S.m., Akhmetzhanov A.R., Hayashi K., Linton N.M., Yang Y., Yuan B., Kobayashi T., Kinoshita R., Nishiura H. Real-time estimation of the risk of death from novel coronavirus (COVID-19) infection: Inference using exported cases. J. Clin. Med. 2020;9:523. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Haberman R. Mathematical Models: Mechanical Vibrations, Population Dynamics, and Traffic Flow. Volume 21 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics; Philadelphia, PA, USA: 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kermack W.O., McKendrick A.G. A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Contain. Pap. Math. Phys. Charact. 1927;115:700–721. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hamer W.H. Epidemic Disease in England: The Evidence of Variability and of Persistency of Type. Bedford Press; Bedford, UK: 1906. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hethcote H.W. The mathematics of infectious diseases. SIAM Rev. 2000;42:599–653. doi: 10.1137/S0036144500371907. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Batista M. Estimation of the final size of the second phase of the coronavirus epidemic by the logistic model. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.03.11.20024901. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Le Page M. Will heat kill the coronavirus? New Sci. 2020;245:6–7. doi: 10.1016/S0262-4079(20)30377-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES