Abstract
Late wilt is a vascular disease of maize (Zea mays L.) caused by the soil-borne and seed-borne fungus Magnaporthiopsis maydis. The pathogen penetrates the roots of maize plants at the seedling stage, grows into the xylem vessels, and gradually spreads upwards. From the flowering stage to the kernel ripening, the fungal hyphae and secreted materials block the water supply in susceptible maize cultivars, leading to rapid dehydration and death. Laccase is an enzyme secreted by fungus for diverse purposes. The M. maydis laccase gene was identified in our laboratory, but under what conditions it is expressed and to what functions remain unknown. In the current study, we tested the influence of plant age and tissue source (roots or leaves) on M. maydis laccase secretion. The results show increasing laccase secretion as corn parts (as ground tissue) were added to the minimal medium (MM). Furthermore, roots stimulated laccase secretion more than leaves, and adult plants enhanced laccase secretion more than young plants. This implies the possibility that the richer lignin tissue of adult plants may cause increased secretion of the enzyme. In vitro pathogenicity assay proved the ability of M. maydis to develop inside detached roots of maize, barley, watermelon, and cotton but not peanut. Testing root powder from those plants in MM revealed a negative correlation between M. maydis growth (expressed as biomass) and laccase secretion. For example, while the addition of maize, barley, or cotton root powder led to increasing fungal dry weight, it also resulted in relatively lower laccase activity. Watermelon and peanut root powder led to opposite responses. These findings suggest a pivotal role of laccase in the ability of M. maydis to exploit and grow on different host tissues. The results encourage further examination and a deeper understanding of the laccase role in these interesting host–pathogen interactions.
Keywords: Cephalosporium maydis, corn, cotton, enzyme, fungus, Harpophora maydis, host–pathogen interactions, lacasse, roots pathogenicity assay, watermelon
1. Introduction
The maize late wilt disease causes severe damage to cornfields throughout Israel. The disease is characterized by rapid wilt of sweet and fodder maize, mainly from the tasseling stage phase until shortly before maturity [1]. The causal agent of the disease is the phytopathogenic fungus Magnaporthiopsis maydis (synonyms are Harpophora maydis and Cephalosporium maydis) [2]. The pathogen is a hemibiotroph, soil-borne [3], and seed-borne [4] fungus transmitted as spores, sclerotia, or hype on plant residues. M. maydis can survive in the soil (for long periods) or by developing inside an alternative host plant, such as Lupinus termis L. (lupine) [5], Gossypium hirsutum L. (cotton), Citrullus lanatus (watermelon), and Setaria viridis (green foxtail) [6,7].
Late wilt disease is considered the primary threat to maize fields in Egypt [8] and Israel [9] and a serious concern to other countries [10,11,12]. Attempts had been made in the past to control the disease using agricultural (balanced soil fertility and flood fallowing) [13,14], biological [15], physical (solar heating) [16], allelochemical [17], and chemical options [9,18,19], with different degrees of success. Nevertheless, today, the primary means of coping with the disease is the use of reduced sensitivity maize cultivars. Recently, for the first time, since the discovery of late wilt disease in Israel, an economical and efficient applicable solution was approved that can be used on a large scale to protect sensitive maize varieties in commercial fields [20].
The pathogen mode of infection is well detailed in the literature observations [4,12,21,22,23]. According to Sabet et al. [22], the infection takes place during the first three weeks of growth. After penetrating the roots, the fungus first appears in the xylem 21 days after seeding. The pathogen reaches the first stem internode above the ground after 35 days and the fourth internode after 49 days. At that stage (nearly 50 days from sowing), M. maydis DNA is detected in various parts of the host plant, with the highest concentration being in the roots [24]. When tassels first emerged (day 63) [22], the fungus was found throughout the length of the stalk, although there was less of it towards the top of the plant. At this plant age, the DNA levels peaked in the stems of a susceptible variety [24], and the first disease symptoms appeared shortly after that. The first symptom is moderately rapid plant wilting [23], progressing upwards. Leaves gradually lose their color and become dehydrated. At 78–84 days post sowing, the fungus was detected in the cob stalks and kernels. The abovementioned pathogenesis progression is described for a sensitive, sweet maize cultivar, whereas a similar infection mode occurs in a resistant cultivar but with about a two-week delay [24].
Laccases (benzenediol: oxygen oxidoreductase, EC 1.10.3.2) are typically produced enzymes in plants and fungi and in some bacteria. In plants, laccases participate in the radical-based mechanisms of lignin polymer formation. Fungi in general and phytopathogenic fungi in particular secrete this enzyme for a variety of purposes. Some functions are related to fungal growth and development, and others are related to interactions with the host plant [25]. Laccases are a group of oxidizing enzymes that catalyzes the reduction of molecular oxygen to water, bypassing the stage of hydrogen peroxide production [26], and they have a variety of potential applications in industry and biotechnology processes [27]. Laccases can oxidize a variety of organic (mainly aromatic) components as well as several inorganic components, including lignin.
Fungal laccases have many other roles, including defensive stress response and an offensive role to plants [28]. However, some of its biological functions are unknown. It was suggested that laccase’s major role in the fungus’ interactions with the host plant is the enzymatic decomposition of plant-produced toxic metabolites that are dangerous to fungus [29]. Indeed, laccase neutralizes the toxicity of these low molecular weight compounds in plants, making them nontoxic to the fungal hyphae. Different fungi were identified to contain closely regulated laccase genes, and phytopathogenic ascomycetes fungi were reported to produce multiple laccase isoforms (isoenzymes). For example, secretion of three laccase isoenzymes was found in Gaeumannomyces graminis [30].
Laccases are generally produced during the secondary metabolism of different fungi growing on a natural substrate or in submerged cultures [31]. Various cultivation parameters influence laccase production, such as carbon limitation, nitrogen source, and concentration, and the composition of microelements. In contrast, the use of excessive concentrations of glucose as a carbon source in the cultivation of laccase-producing fungal strains has an inhibitory effect on laccase production known as carbon catabolite repression [32].
The gene encoding laccase in M. maydis was previously identified and sequenced in our laboratory [33]. Still, it is unknown under what conditions the enzyme is produced and secreted and for what purpose (fungal development or the interactions with the host plant). Answering these questions is significant for our understanding of this emerging pathogen morphogenesis, its host relations, and its mode of operation during the infection process. The current work is the first report on M. maydis laccase secretion and production under the influence of a host tissue in submerged cultures. To this end, we used in vitro growth media manipulations and roots pathogenicity assay and measured variations in fungal growth weight, DNA levels, and extracellular laccase activity.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Fungal Isolates and Growth Conditions
One selected isolate of M. maydis, Hm2 (CBS 133,165), was used for this study. This isolate is currently deposited at the CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands. The morphological, microscopic, and molecular characteristics of the Hm2 isolate have all been well studied and have confirmed its identification [24,34]. All fungal colonies were grown on solid potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium (Difco, Detroit, MI, USA) at 28 ± 1 °C in the dark for 4–6 days. For submerged culturing, five 6-mm-diameter agar disks cut from the margins of PDA M. maydis colony (grown under the above conditions) were added to each 50 mL sterile minimal medium (MM) in a 250-mL Erlenmeyer flask. The MM was prepared according to Reference [35] and contained micro- and macronutrients without glucose or with 0.1% glucose (as will be indicated for each experiment) in double-distilled water (DDW).
To these flasks, 750 mg of plant parts (roots or leaves) powder (prepared by grinding in liquid nitrogen) was added. Cultures were grown at 28 ± 1 °C in complete darkness on a rotary shaker at 150 revolutions per minute (RPM) for one week. At the end of the growth, the fungus and plant components were filtered from the substrate through double-layer Whatman 3-mm filter paper in a Büchner funnel, dried at 40 °C for 24 h to a nearly complete dryness and weighed.
2.2. Maize and Other Plant Species Seedling Growth
The maize cultivars chosen for the experiments were Jubilee cv. (sweet maize from SRS Snowy River seeds, Australia, supplied by Green 2000 Ltd., Bitan Aharon, Israel) and Prelude cv. (from SRS Snowy River seeds, Australia, supplied by Green 2000 Ltd., Bitan Aharon, Israel), as will be indicated for each figure. Both cultivars had previously been tested for susceptibility in the field and proved to be late wilt sensitive [1,9,20,24]. Other summer field crops tested in this work were Gossypium hirsutum L. (cotton, Pima cv.), Citrullus lanatus (watermelon, Malali cv.), Hordeum vulgare (barley, Noga cv.), and Arachis hypogaea (peanut or groundnut, Harari cv.). Cotton and watermelon were previously proven to be M. maydis hosts [6,7]. All the plants were grown for 30 days, in a growth chamber at a constant temperature of 27 ± 1 °C and relative humidity of 38% under a 16-h photoperiod illuminated by cool-white fluorescent tubes (Philips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands). The soil was commercial, non-sterilized peat mixed with 30% Perlite No. 4 (for aerating the ground). Irrigation was done by adding 100 ± 10 mL tap water every 48 h to the pots using a computerized irrigation system.
2.3. Laccase Activity Assay
The fungus was incubated in the test medium for various periods, and the resultant suspension was filtrated and tested with 2,2′-azinobis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS, Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA). This substrate oxidized at high efficiency by laccase to produce a bluish-green color product measured in this work at 450 nm wavelength. Today, the majority of works described in the literature are done with 420 nm, which is considered the optimal wavelength for the ABTS substrate. Thus, although the current work was conducted near this optimum wavelength (at 450 nm), the measurements were still strong enough and differed significantly from each other (p < 0.05) to allow an accurate and detailed understanding of the host tissue effect on M. maydis extracellular laccase activity.
The growth fluid from each treatment was filtered through a 0.2-micron filter to separate the fungus from the substrate. From each repetition, 237.5 µl was moved to 96-well microplates (Greiner Bio-One GmbH, Frickenhausen, Germany). To each well, 12.5 µl of 50 mM ABTS (dissolved in 50 mM Buffer Citrate, pH 5) was added. Absorbance changes were measured by HP 8453 UV-visible Spectroscopy Systems (Hewlett Packard GmbH, Waldbronn, Germany) after incubation at 28 ± 1 °C in the dark for for 10 min (unless otherwise indicated).
The enzymatic units (U) was defined as the amount of enzyme oxidizing 1 µmol ABTS in 1 min and was calculated by the following formula: U/L = (∆A × Vt × 106)/(ε × d × Vs) [36,37], where ∆A = change in absorbance per min; Vt = total volume measured; 106 = correction factor; Vs = volume of enzyme; (ε) of ABTS = extinction coefficient for the oxidation, which is 36,000 M-1 cm−1; and d = path length of the optical cell, which is 1 cm.
2.4. In Vitro Root Infection
Lateral, young, white, about 2-cm-long roots were removed from 30-day-old seedlings and washed under tap water to discharge the soil. Immediately afterward, they were sterilized using 70% ethanol solution and dried using a fume hood. Each root was moved to a sterile Petri dish covered on the inside bottom with Whatman 3-mm filter paper. Two milliliters of autoclaved DDW was used for wetting the filter paper. Culture PDA agar disk (6 mm in diameter) cut from the growing edge of a 4–6-day-old M. maydis colony (grown previously at 28 ± 1 °C in the dark) was placed at the cut end of each root. In the negative control roots, a sterile PDA agar disk was used instead. The Petri plates were maintained in the dark at 28 ± 1 °C. Each treatment was conducted in five independent repetitions, and the entire experiment was conducted twice. The lengths of root infection threads (a dark filament within the plants’ detached root) were identified, measured, and photographed three and six days after inoculation. For DNA extraction, one fragment was cut 0.5 cm from the infected (or uninfected in the control treatment) roots’ cut ends. DNA isolation and qPCR were conducted, as will be described below.
2.5. Molecular Diagnosis of Magnaporthiopsis Maydis
Each root fragment considered one replication. DNA was obtained using the Extract-N-amp plant PCR kit (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Each repeat was tested three times using qPCR to ensure consistency of the results. The qPCR method used was recently described in detail [6]. Briefly, the qPCR reactions were executed using the ABI PRISM® 7900 HT Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) for 384-well plates. A reaction volume of 5 µL (in total) contained 2 µL of the DNA extract sample, 2.5 µL of the Universal SYBR® Green Supermix iTaq™ (Bio-Rad Laboratories Ltd., Rishon Le Zion, Israel), and 0.25 µL of each of the forward and reverse primers (at a concentration of 10 µM of each primer per well). The qPCR plan was 1 min at 95 °C precycle activation stage; 40 cycles of denaturation (15 s at 95 °C), and then annealing and extension (30 s at 60 °C), followed by a melting curve. The target A200a M. maydis-specific DNA was evaluated against a reference “housekeeping” gene—the mitochondria-cytochrome c oxidase, COXI gene (sequences in Table 1).
Table 1.
Pairs | Primer | Sequence | Uses | Amplification | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pair 1 | A200a-for A200a-rev |
5′-CCGACGCCTAAAATACAGGA-3′ 5′-GGGCTTTTTAGGGCCTTTTT-3′ |
Target gene | M maydis AFLP-derived species-specific fragment | [24] |
Pair 2 | COX-F COX-R |
5′-GTATGCCACGTCGCATTCCAGA-3′ 5′-CAACTACGGATATATAAGRRCCRRAACTG-3′ |
Control | Cytochrome c oxidase (COX) gene product | [38,39] |
1 qPCR—quantitative real-time PCR. AFLP—amplified fragment length polymorphism.
2.6. Statistical Analyses
A completely randomized statistical design was used in all experiments. Data analysis and statistics were done using the JMP program, 15th edition, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA. The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by multiple comparisons post hoc of the Student’s t-test for each pair was used to evaluate the M. maydis infection outcome in the experiments. The t-test compared each treatment to the control (with a significance threshold of p = 0.05). Relatively high standard error values were expected in the detached root inoculation experiment qPCR results, whereas an objective difficulty in achieving a uniform infection exists.
3. Results
Two sets of experiments were conducted to reveal the host tissue rule in M. maydis laccase secretion. The first experimental set aimed at studying the effect of maize sprouts’ tissues at different ages on laccase secretion in M. maydis. The second goal was to answer the question of whether different hosts’ root tissues have a distinct influence on laccase secretion.
In the first experiment, root powder from a 40-day-old plant in a minimal liquid medium was used as a nutrition source (Figure 1). Changes in laccase activity over time expressed as increasing product concentration (U/L) produced a linear curve. This ensured that the substrate used (ABTS) was at an excessive concentration and was not consumed during this time point. Also, the curve showed that the selected time point (10 min) was within the linear curve zone. Therefore, we conducted all the laccase assays at this time point.
In leaf-supplemented media, the fresh fungal biomass was significantly (p < 0.05) higher compared to both aged root-containing media (Figure 2). However, this response was dependent on plant tissue age. The 43-day-old plants’ leaf-supplemented medium caused the maximum fungal growth, whereas in medium containing 23-day-old plants’ aboveground parts powder, a significant (p < 0.05) 3.4-fold reduction in fungal biomass was recorded. In the root-containing media, no age-dependent response was recorded, and both ages tested (23 and 43 days) led to lower and similar fungal wet weights.
According to Figure 1, an incubation time of 10 min was set in the laccase assay in submerged cultures, which enables the detection of differences in laccase secretion between leaf and root. Indeed, in a follow-up experiment, we investigated the effect of plant age on extracellular laccase secretion in M. maydis (Figure 3). When the maize plants’ powder was from plants aged 23 and 43 days (designated young and mature, respectively), interesting differences were revealed. The highest laccase activity was measured when the root powder of mature seedlings was added to the cultures. Similar levels of extracellular laccase were found when young seedlings’ root powder was used instead. However, the addition of mature leaves led to a significant reduction in laccase activity (p < 0.05) compared to the addition of roots (mature or young). Leaves from 23-day-old plants induced extracellular laccase activity similar to leaves from 43-day-old plants (with no significant difference).
In the second experiment set, detached seedling roots from various plant species were used in vitro to identify the M. maydis ability to exploit them as a nutrition source and to measure variations in laccase secretion during growth. Indeed, the pathogen reacted differently to young roots from maize and other plant species used as field crops in the Hula Valley (Galilee area, northern Israel). The appearance of an infection thread (fungus filaments) inside the roots examined is in the following descending order: barley (where the longest thread was detected, Figure 4), watermelon, maize, cotton, and peanuts. The infection thread spread in all the plant roots tested except for peanuts. On day 3 from inoculation, the barley and watermelon treatments differed significantly (p < 0.05) from the rest of the species tested. On day 6 in the barley treatment, the infection thread was significantly (p < 0.05) longer compared to all other treatments. At the same time, maize and watermelon reached a similar result that was significantly higher than the cotton result. No infection thread was identified in the negative control treatments (non-inoculated roots).
In qPCR-based diagnostic of the samples made of a root section 0.5 cm from the infection site; M. maydis relative DNA levels were in the following descending order: watermelon, barley, cotton, and corn (Figure 5A). Similar to the measurement of the infection thread that resulted in zero values in the peanut detached roots (Figure 4), no DNA of the pathogen could be measured in those roots. Although M. maydis DNA levels in maize roots were less than a third of those in watermelon roots, the incidence (infection percentage) in maize reached 100%, while only 67% was recorded in watermelon (Figure 5B).
The root powder of the above-inspected plant species in MM-submerged M. maydis cultures revealed curious differences in fungal biomass and extracellular laccase secretion. Any of the root powder inspected enhanced the fungal growth in comparison to the control (pure minimal medium). Interestingly, it was found that the roots of maize and barley caused a high elevation (more than two-fold) in the pathogen’s wet-biomass (p < 0.05, Figure 6A). The cotton root powder treatment had a similar fungal fresh weight as the control but a significant (p < 0.05) increase in fungal dry weight. The highest dry weight was recorded in the barley-enriched medium, with a significant difference (p < 0.05) from maize and cotton media (Figure 6B). Still, these two enriched media yielded a significantly higher fungal dry weight than in the peanut- and watermelon-enriched media. Upon examining extracellular laccase activity through ABTS oxidation (Figure 6C), the strongest activity was measured by the influence of peanut and watermelon root powder (p < 0.05). Maize- and cotton-enriched media, induced relatively moderate laccase activity. The maize medium induced significantly higher laccase activity than the barley-containing medium (p < 0.05), which was the least inducing medium of all plant-supplemented media inspected. All laccase activity levels measured in this experiment were relatively low in comparison to the levels measured in Figure 3. This was the result of the addition of 0.1% glucose that led to catabolite repression [32]. In contrast, this glucose addition enables higher fungal-fresh-biomass (compared to Figure 2).
4. Discussion
M. maydis is considered exotic and unfamiliar in most parts of the world. It has been officially reported so far in only eight countries. Most of the work done on this pathogen has focused on means to restrict its distribution, to control its damages, and to improve our ability to detect and monitor it. Hence, the basic information regarding the biology of the pathogen and its interactions with the host plant remains unknown. This pioneering work provides preliminary results that could encourage the future establishment and widen the database that we have on this pathogen. Such vital information, yet to be achieved, includes the pathogen enzymatic array secreted during pathogenesis, the potential toxins it may produce, and the cellular network of signal transduction pathways that coordinated and synchronized these events. In this context, the laccase enzyme studied here exemplifies the importance of such a database for future coping with this emerging threat.
The laccase enzyme is secreted by fungi and can catalyze the oxidation of phenolic substrates for diverse functions, including virulence factors [28]. However, no information can be found about the role of laccases in the interaction of M. maydis with its host plant. The gene for M. maydis laccase was identified in our laboratory [33], but its specific roles under various conditions still remain unknown. In this study, we tested the influence of tissues (roots or leaves) from seedlings of different ages on M. maydis saprotrophic growth and laccase secretion. The results show basal and very low laccase secretion in minimal medium without glucose or with the addition of 0.1% glucose. The laccase levels increased significantly as corn parts were added as a form of ground tissue. Furthermore, mature roots were found to stimulate laccase secretion more than leaves (mature or young). Thus, it is possible that the composition of mature roots in maize, which contains more hard tissues (such as lignin) compared to leaves, may cause increased secretion of the enzyme, as was found by others [40].
To support this hypothesis, an opposite correlation was found between fungal saprotrophic growth (expressed as biomass) and laccase secretion. For example, in the root powder-supplemented medium, the fungal fresh weight was lower than in the leaf powder-containing medium (Figure 2). Similarly, the peanut root powder, which was the most potent laccase inducer among the plant species inspected here (Figure 6C), was the lesser growth enhancer (accessible nutrition source) (Figure 6A,B). This was also reflected in the fungal inability to develop inside peanut-detached roots (Figure 4). Contrary to this, barley roots-enriched media had the highest fungal biomass in submerged cultures and the longest infection thread in the detached root assay but the lowest extracellular laccase activity. Thus, the difficulty of the fungus to exploit some tissues may be correlated to laccase activity. It should also be taken into consideration that other factors, such as plant-derived inhibitors, may affect these findings.
These findings encourage further examination of host–pathogen interactions and foster a deeper understanding as to under what conditions the fungi use this enzyme. Reviewing the literature suggests that laccase secretion was found to rely on growth conditions and media nutrition composition (reviewed by Reference [41]). Laccase production in fungi is generally affected by different sources of carbon and by the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio (C/N) [42]. Also, laccases were generally secreted at low concentrations, but with the addition of various xenobiotic compounds, such as xylidene, lignin, and veratryl alcohol, fungal laccase production was increased [31]. Some of these compounds affect growth rate or metabolism, while others, such as ethanol, indirectly induce laccase secretion.
The excessive concentrations of sucrose or glucose in many cases reduce laccase production. However, in the cellulose-containing medium, the laccase was produced more efficiently [32]. Supporting that is our observation that the use of the minimal medium with the addition of 0.1% glucose resulted in relatively lower extracellular laccase activity (Figure 6). An interesting example is the case of Heterobasidion annosum s.s. and its host plant, the Scots pine [43]. Higher laccase activities were measured in culture growth media comprising sucrose, cellulose, or glucose in comparison to that of cellobiose as a sole carbon source. The severest Scots pine seedlings’ death was observed when they were infected by H. annosum s.s. on an extra carbon source such as glucose, suggesting that glucose plays an essential role in the upregulation of laccase activity in this fungus.
Based on the current work’s findings, a subsequent study could examine which additional substances and conditions in seedlings and mature plants induce laccase secretion in M. maydis. It would also be very interesting to map the laccase profile in this fungus and to study its expression patterns and role in the pathogen’s interactions with different hosts. An example of such a relationship is the fungal defense against antifungal phenols secreted by the plant. The first step conducted here of adjusting a quantitative/qualitative and rapid test for the secretion of extracellular laccases in the maize pathogen M. maydis provides a new research direction for understanding this fungus biology. This and other methods could be used to explore these extracellular enzymes and to enrich our knowledge about them in this unique pathogen.
5. Conclusions
The maize late wilt causal agent, Magnaporthiopsis maydis, is an emerging pathogen of destructive potential, but very limited information exists about its host relationship. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to study M. maydis laccases. Previous studies have shown that laccase is secreted during the penetration of pathogenic fungus into the plant to decompose phenols in the cell wall. The current work aimed at studying the effect of the host tissue (roots and leaves at different ages) on M. maydis saprophytic growth and secretion of extracellular enzyme laccase. We also studied the effect of roots from various crops on these measures. The results reveal an interesting negative correlation between the ability of the fungus to grow on different plant tissues and the extracellular laccase it produces. These conflicting effects hint at the role of laccase in exploiting different nutrition sources. The results of this study are an important step towards studying M. maydis host–pathogen interactions under different conditions. The findings expand the scientific research tools currently available for studying this pathogen’s behavior and for exploring its laccase involvement in pathogenesis.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Shlomit Dor (MIGAL–Galilee Research Institute), Tomer Lindeman, Sahar Nitzan, Ronit Smith, and Topaz Ron (Tel-Hai College, Israel) for their technical assistance.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, O.D. and Y.G.; methodology, O.D. and Y.G.; validation, O.D. and Y.G.; formal analysis, O.D. and Y.G.; investigation, O.D. and Y.G.; resources, O.D.; data curation, O.D. and Y.G.; writing—original draft preparation, O.D.; writing—review and editing, O.D. and Y.G.; visualization, O.D.; supervision, O.D.; project administration, O.D.; funding acquisition, O.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the MIGAL—Galilee Research Institute, Israel, Science Relations Foundation and the Tel-Hai College, Israel, Science Relations Foundation. The APC was funded by the MIGAL—Galilee Research Institute, Israel.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
References
- 1.Degani O., Movshowitz D., Dor S., Meerson A., Goldblat Y., Rabinovitz O. Evaluating Azoxystrobin Seed Coating against Maize Late Wilt Disease Using a Sensitive qPCR-Based Method. Plant Dis. 2019;103:238–248. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-05-18-0759-RE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Klaubauf S., Tharreau D., Fournier E., Groenewald J.Z., Crous P.W., de Vries R.P., Lebrun M.H. Resolving the polyphyletic nature of Pyricularia (Pyriculariaceae) Stud. Mycol. 2014;79:85–120. doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2014.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sabet K.A., Samra A.S., Mansour I.M. Saprophytic behaviour of Cephalosporium maydis and C. acremonium. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1970;66:265–271. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1970.tb06433.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Michail S.H., Abou-Elseoud M.S., Nour Eldin M.S. Seed health testing of corn for Cephalosporium maydis. Acta Phytopathol. Entomol. Hung. 1999;34:35–42. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sahab A.F., Osman A.R., Soleman N.K., Mikhail M.S. Studies on root-rot of lupin in Egypt and its control. Egypt. J. Phytopathol. 1985;17:23–35. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Degani O., Dor S., Abraham D., Cohen R. Interactions between Magnaporthiopsis maydis and Macrophomina phaseolina, the Causes of Wilt Diseases in Maize and Cotton. Microorganisms. 2020;8:249. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8020249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dor S., Degani O. Uncovering the Host Range for Maize Pathogen Magnaporthiopsis maydis. Plants. 2019;8:259. doi: 10.3390/plants8080259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.El-Naggarr A.A.A., Sabryr A.M., Yassin M.A. Impact of late wilt disease caused by Harpophora maydis on maize yield. J. Biol. Chem. Environ. Sci. 2015;10:577–595. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Degani O., Weinberg T., Graph S. Chemical control of maize late wilt in the field. Phytoparasitica. 2014;42:559–570. doi: 10.1007/s12600-014-0394-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Molinero-Ruiz M.L., Melero-Vara J.M., Mateos A. Cephalosporium maydis, the cause of late wilt in maize, a pathogen new to Portugal and Spain. Plant Dis. 2011;94:379. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-94-3-0379A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Payak M., Sharma R. Techniques of Scoring for Resistance to Important Diseases of Maize. Indian Agricultural Research Institute; New Delhi, India: 1983. Disease rating scales in maize in India; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pecsi S., Nemeth L. Appearance of Cephalosporium maydis Samra Sabet and Hingorani in Hungary. Meded. Fac. Landbouwkd. Toegepaste Biol. Wet. Univ. Gent. 1998;63:873–877. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Samra A.S., Sabet K.A., Abdel-Rahim M.F. Effect of Soil Conditions and Cultural Practices on Infection with Stalk Rots. U.A.R. Ministry of Agric. Government Printing Offices; Cairo, Egypt: 1966. pp. 117–164. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Singh S., Siradhana B. Effect of macro and micronutrients on the development of late wilt of maize induced by Cephalosporium maydis. Summa Phytopathol. 1990;16:140–145. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Elshahawy I.E., El-Sayed A.E.-K.B. Maximizing the efficacy of Trichoderma to control Cephalosporium maydis, causing maize late wilt disease, using freshwater microalgae extracts. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control. 2018;28:48. doi: 10.1186/s41938-018-0052-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fayzalla E., Sadik E., Elwakil M., Gomah A. Soil solarization for controlling Cephalosporium maydis, the cause of late wilt disease of maize in Egypt. Egypt J. Phytopathol. 1994;22:171–178. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tej R., Rodríguez-Mallol C., Rodríguez-Arcos R., Karray-Bouraoui N., Molinero-Ruiz L. Inhibitory effect of Lycium europaeum extracts on phytopathogenic soil-borne fungi and the reduction of late wilt in maize. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2018;152:249–265. doi: 10.1007/s10658-018-1469-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Abd-el-Rahim M.F., Sabet K.A., El-Shafey H.A., El-Assiuty E.M. Chemical control of the late-wilt disease of maize caused by Cephalosporium maydis. Agric. Res. Rev. 1982;60:31–49. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Degani O., Cernica G. Diagnosis and Control of Harpophora maydis, the Cause of Late Wilt in Maize. Adv. Microbiol. 2014;4:94–105. doi: 10.4236/aim.2014.42014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Degani O., Dor S., Movshowitz D., Fraidman E., Rabinowitz O., Graph S. Effective chemical protection against the maize late wilt causal agent, Harpophora maydis, in the field. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0208353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Payak M.M., Lal S., Lilaramani J., Renfro B.L. Cephalosporium maydis—A new threat to maize in India. Indian Phytopathol. 1970;23:562–569. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sabet K.A., Zaher A.M., Samra A.S., Mansour I.M. Pathogenic behaviour of Cephalosporium maydis and C. acremonium. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1970;66:257–263. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1970.tb06432.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Samra A.S., Sabet K.A., Hingorani M.K. Late wilt disease of maize caused by Cephalosporium maydis. Phytopathology. 1963;53:402–406. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Drori R., Sharon A., Goldberg D., Rabinovitz O., Levy M., Degani O. Molecular diagnosis for Harpophora maydis, the cause of maize late wilt in Israel. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2013;52:16–29. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Patel A., Patel V., Patel R., Trivedi U., Patel K. Emerging Technologies in Environmental Bioremediation. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2020. Fungal laccases: Versatile green catalyst for bioremediation of organopollutants; p. 85. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Janusz G., Pawlik A., Świderska-Burek U., Polak J., Sulej J., Jarosz-Wilkołazka A., Paszczyński A. Laccase properties, physiological functions, and evolution. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:966. doi: 10.3390/ijms21030966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rodríguez-Couto S. Recent Advancement in White Biotechnology Through Fungi. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2019. Fungal laccase: A versatile enzyme for biotechnological applications; pp. 429–457. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Baldrian P. Fungal laccases–occurrence and properties. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2006;30:215–242. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-4976.2005.00010.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bolobova A., Askadskii A., Kondrashchenko V., Rabinovich M. Theoretical Principles of Technology of Wood Composites. Book II. Enzymes, Models, Processes. Nauka; Moscow, Russia: 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Litvintseva A.P., Henson J.M. Cloning, characterization, and transcription of three laccase genes from Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici, the take-all fungus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002;68:1305–1311. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.3.1305-1311.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Singh D., Gupta N.J.B. Microbial Laccase: A robust enzyme and its industrial applications. Biologia. 2020:1–11. doi: 10.2478/s11756-019-00414-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Piscitelli A., Giardina P., Lettera V., Pezzella C., Sannia G., Faraco V. Induction and transcriptional regulation of laccases in fungi. Curr. Genom. 2011;12:104–112. doi: 10.2174/138920211795564331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Drori R. M.Sc. Thesis. Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Rehovot, Israel: 2010. Involvement of Harpophora maydis in late Wilt Disease of Sweet Corn: Characterization of the Disease Cycle and Identifying Means of Control. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Degani O., Goldblat Y. Ambient Stresses Regulate the Development of the Maize Late Wilt Causing Agent, Harpophora maydis. Agric. Sci. 2014;5:571–582. doi: 10.4236/as.2014.57060. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Leach J., Lang B.R., Yoder O.C. Methods for selection of mutants and in vitro culture of Cochliobolus heterostrophus. Microbiology. 1982;128:1719–1729. doi: 10.1099/00221287-128-8-1719. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Baltierra-Trejo E., Márquez-Benavides L., Sánchez-Yáñez J.M. Inconsistencies and ambiguities in calculating enzyme activity: The case of laccase. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2015;119:126–131. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2015.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Agrawal K., Verma P. Laccase: Addressing the ambivalence associated with the calculation of enzyme activity. 3 Biotech. 2019;9:365. doi: 10.1007/s13205-019-1895-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Li W., Hartung J.S., Levy L. Quantitative real-time PCR for detection and identification of Candidatus Liberibacter species associated with citrus huanglongbing. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2006;66:104–115. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2005.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Weller S., Elphinstone J., Smith N., Boonham N., Stead D. Detection of ralstonia solanacearumstrains with a quantitative, multiplex, real-time, fluorogenic PCR (TaqMan) assay. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000;66:2853–2858. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.7.2853-2858.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ten Have R., Teunissen P.J.J.C.R. Oxidative mechanisms involved in lignin degradation by white-rot fungi. Chem. Rev. 2001;101:3397–3414. doi: 10.1021/cr000115l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gochev V., Krastanov A. Fungal laccases. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 2007;13:75–83. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bollag J.-M., Leonowicz A. Comparative studies of extracellular fungal laccases. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1984;48:849–854. doi: 10.1128/AEM.48.4.849-854.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kuo H.-C., Détry N., Choi J., Lee Y.-H. Potential roles of laccases on virulence of Heterobasidion annosum ss. Microb. Pathog. 2015;81:16–21. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2015.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]