Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Jul 9;15(7):e0236073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236073

Correction: Reliability of technologies to measure the barbell velocity: Implications for monitoring resistance training

Alejandro Martínez-Cava, Alejandro Hernández-Belmonte, Javier Courel-Ibáñez, Ricardo Morán-Navarro, Juan José González-Badillo, Jesús G Pallarés
PMCID: PMC7347109  PMID: 32645094

Fig 3 is incorrect. The authors have provided a corrected version here.

Fig 3. Intra-device agreement between two T-Force devices.

Fig 3

Bland–Altman plots for the velocity readings in bench press (A, C and E panels) and full squat (B, D and F) exercises. Panels are ordered by velocity outcomes: mean velocity (MV), mean propulsive velocity (MPV) and peak velocity (PV). The grey shaded area indicates an acceptable level of agreement between devices, which results in differences in terms of load ≤ 5% 1RM [26,27].

Reference

  • 1.Martínez-Cava A, Hernández-Belmonte A, Courel-Ibáñez J, Morán-Navarro R, González-Badillo JJ, Pallarés JG (2020) Reliability of technologies to measure the barbell velocity: Implications for monitoring resistance training. PLoS ONE 15(6): e0232465 10.1371/journal.pone.0232465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES