Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Jul 9;15(7):e0235331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235331

Clinical presentation and comorbidities of obstructive sleep apnea-COPD overlap syndrome

Dan Adler 1,2,*, Sébastien Bailly 3,4, Meriem Benmerad 3,4, Marie Joyeux-Faure 3,4, Ingrid Jullian-Desayes 3,4, Paola Marina Soccal 1,2, Jean Paul Janssens 1,2, Marc Sapène 5, Yves Grillet 6, Bruno Stach 7, Renaud Tamisier 3,4, Jean-Louis Pépin 1,3,4
Editor: Stelios Loukides8
PMCID: PMC7347183  PMID: 32645005

Abstract

Background

More advanced knowledge is needed on how COPD alters the clinical presentation of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and how the association of both diseases, known as ‘overlap syndrome’ (OVS), impacts on cardiovascular health.

Objective

To investigate differences between patients with OVS and those with moderate-to-severe OSA alone.

Methods

A cross-sectional study conducted in the French National Sleep Apnea Registry between January 1997 and January 2017. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to compare OVS versus OSA alone on symptoms and cardiovascular health.

Results

46,786 patients had moderate-to-severe OSA. Valid spirometry was available for 16,466 patients: 14,368 (87%) had moderate-to-severe OSA alone and 2098 (13%) had OVS. A lower proportion of OVS patients complained of snoring, morning headaches and excessive daytime sleepiness compared to OSA alone (median Epworth Sleepiness Scale score: 9 [interquartile range (IQR) 6–13] versus 10 (IQR 6–13), respectively; P <0.02). Similarly, a lower proportion of OVS patients (35.6% versus 39.4%, respectively; P <0.01) experienced sleepiness while driving. In contrast, 63.5% of the OVS population experienced nocturia compared to 58.0% of the OSA population (P<0.01). Apnea hypopnea index (36 [25; 52] vs 33.1 [23.3; 50]), oxygen desaturation index (28 [15; 48] vs 25.2 [14; 45]) and mean nocturnal SaO2 (92 [90; 93.8] vs 93 [91.3; 94]) were significantly more altered in the OVS group. Associated COPD had no effect on the prevalence of hypertension and stroke. After controlling for main confounders, COPD severity was associated in a dose-response relationship with a higher prevalence of coronary heart disease, heart failure and peripheral arteriopathy.

Conclusions

In adults with moderate-to-severe OSA, OVS was minimally symptomatic, but exhibited higher odds for prevalent coronary heart disease, heart failure and peripheral arteriopathy.

Introduction

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and COPD are among the most prevalent chronic diseases and represent a major economic burden for healthcare systems worldwide [13]. Two recent statements from the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society have emphasized that the clinical presentation of OSA-COPD “overlap syndrome” compared to OSA alone remains undefined and more research is needed to elucidate how the association of both diseases impacts on cardiovascular health [4, 5]. In particular, observational studies comparing cardiovascular outcomes among individuals with OVS compared to OSA or COPD alone have been recommended to address this knowledge gap [4].

OSA can be suspected in various clinical settings, including in highly symptomatic individuals or in an ‘at-risk’ population for cardiometabolic diseases where most patients do not present classical 0SA symptoms. This has now been evidenced by multiple recent cluster analyses [69]. The description of additional phenotypes is ongoing and an improved knowledge of their associated clinical presentation is required to appropriately design diagnostic pathways and specific patient-reported outcomes adapted to various clinical scenarios. In line with this challenge, we and others have reported that OSA is less symptomatic in COPD patients and might be better anticipated by assessment of lung function rather than classical screening tools [1012]. However, these data emerge from relatively limited sample size populations and need external validation in large real-life routine practices to allow a generalization of findings.

The co-occurrence of OSA and COPD is characterized by profound nocturnal hypoxemia and a higher risk of pulmonary hypertension and right heart failure [1316]. In terms of intermediary mechanisms, OSA and COPD share an increased burden of systemic inflammation via the activation of transcriptional factors (nuclear factor kappa B and hypoxia-inducible factor 1), oxidative stress, sympathetic overactivity and endothelial dysfunction [1719]. Thus, it can be expected that cardiovascular diseases are more prevalent in patients with OVS compared to OSA or COPD alone. However, there are very few reports on the prevalence of cardiovascular diseases in patients with OVS [2023] and it remains to be delineated how OSA and COPD interact to magnify the cardiometabolic risk in real-life routine practice.

The aim of this study was to report clinical differences between OSA and OVS patients at initial presentation in a large national sleep apnea registry and to investigate the effect of COPD on the cardiovascular risk in OSA patients.

Methods

Study design and population

This is a cross-sectional study using prospective data from the French National Sleep Apnea Registry (Observatoire Sommeil de la Fédération de Pneumologie [OSFP; www.osfp.fr]). The methodology and participants of the registry have been described in detail elsewhere [9, 24, 25]. In brief, the registry is a web-based report administered by the French Federation of Pulmonology. It contains standardized, anonymized, longitudinal data of patients referred for suspected sleep-disordered breathing, assessed by respiratory physicians working in private practice and general or university hospitals.

Among 100,759 patients included in the OSFP database from January 1997 to January 2017, 72,376 patients had completed a sleep study within 6 months of the first medical visit and were flagged for analysis in the present study. A subgroup of 46,786 patients >18 years old with an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥15 and/or oxygen desaturation index (ODI) ≥15 was then selected to assure a robust diagnosis of sleep apnea. Valid measurement of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) over forced vital capacity (FVC) was available for 16,466 patients (Fig 1). Demographic data and medical history were collected during the baseline evaluations, including diagnosis of cardiovascular comorbidities made by a physician. Symptoms were evaluated using standardized questionnaires.

Fig 1. Study population profile.

Fig 1

OSFP = Observatoire Sommeil de la Fédération de Pneumologie, OSA = sleep apnea syndrome, AHI = apnea-hypopnea index, ODI = oxygen desaturation index, OVS = overlap syndrome.

Ethics committee approval to set up the study database was obtained from the French information technology and personal data protection authorities (C.C.T. I.R.S n° 09.521). The OSFP Independent Scientific Advisory Committee approved the use of this database for the present study. All patients included gave written informed consent.

Sleep studies

Full night, in-laboratory, attended polysomnography or type III cardiopulmonary sleep recordings are required by the OSFP registry for OSA diagnosis. In France, sleep stages and arousals are usually scored using the American Academy of Sleep Medicine criteria [26]. Apnea is scored if a drop of 90% or more in airflow signal excursion is noted for at least 10 s. Hypopnea is defined as a drop greater than or equal to 30% in airflow lasting at least 10 s and associated with 3% oxygen desaturation or electroencephalogram arousal. Type III cardiopulmonary sleep recordings are a reliable, cost-effective option for suspected OSA [27, 28]. Interpretation of type III recording using hypopnea criteria, which includes only a 30% drop in airflow and 3% desaturation, has been demonstrated to have the best diagnosis accuracy compared to full polysomnography [29]. AHI cut-off values between 15 and <30 are used to classify moderate sleep apnea and a cut-off value ≥30 is considered as severe sleep apnea.

Spirometry

In France, pulmonary function tests are offered as part of the initial workup for OSA in the case of current or past cigarette smoking and/or obesity (body mass index [BMI] >30 kg/m2) and/or respiratory symptoms, such as dyspnea [30]. A post-bronchodilator fixed FEV1/FVC ratio <70% is used to define the presence of persistent airflow limitation and thus COPD.(1) Specific spirometric FEV1 (percentage of predicted) cut points are used to assess airflow limitation severity: 1) GOLD 1 (FEV1 ≥80%); 2) GOLD 2 (50% ≤FEV1 <80%); 3) GOLD 3 (30% ≤FEV1 <50%); 4) GOLD 4 (FEV1<30%).

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics are reported as counts and percentages for categorical data and the median and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous variables. When comparing subgroups, we used the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test for continuous variables or the chi-squared test for categorical variables. As variables presented less than 5% of missing values, a simple imputation was implemented, based on the median for quantitative variables or most common attribute value for qualitative data. Univariable logistic regression models were used to characterize OVS compared to OSA alone. Age, gender, apnea-hypopnea index, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, peripheral arterial disease, heart failure, coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction, stroke, diabetes, cigarette smoking and alcohol exposure, excessive daytime sleepiness and nocturia were all significantly associated with the outcome (P < .05) and included in a multivariable logistic regression model. A stepwise forward selection method was used to define the final multivariable model. Statistical interaction between FEV1 and AHI on cardiovascular outcomes was non-significant when tested in a logistic model (P values of >0.15 for all cardiovascular outcomes). Logistic regression models were also used to test the effect of type of sleep study (type III or type I), age, gender, BMI, smoking status, AHI and COPD on cardiovascular outcomes. The collinearity between factors was tested. Log linearity between the variables was tested and the variables were transformed into categorical variables if necessary. Statistical analyses were conducted with SAS v9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Results were considered significant at P values of 0.05.

Results

Study population

A total of 16,466 patients with available spirometry data were included in the present analysis. The clinical characteristics are presented in Table 1. Among these, 14,368 (87%) had OSA and 2098 (13%) had OVS. Clinical characteristics of 16,466 OSA patients who were offered spirometry compared to 30,320 OSA patients without available spirometry data are available in the online supplementary S1 Table. By definition, OVS patients had a median FEV1/FVC ratio of 64% (interquartile range [IQR] 59 to 67) compared to OSA patients who had a FEV1/FVC ratio of 82% (IQR 77 to 87.9) (P <0.01). Median FEV1 (% predicted) was 75 (IQR 60.0 to 88.1) in OVS patients and 97 (IQR 86.0 to 107.7) in OSA patients (P <0.01). GOLD stages were: 1: 863 (41%); 2: 976 (46.5%); 3 and 4 combined: 259 (12.3%). There were no differences in BMI between groups. Mean nocturnal SaO2 was lower in patients with OVS versus OSA alone (92% (IQR 90.0 to 93.8) and 93% (IQR 91.3 to 94.0), respectively; P <0.01). Conversely, PaCO2 was higher in patients with OVS compared to patients with OSA (39 mmHg (IQR 36.0 to 43.0) versus 38 mmHg (IQR 35.6 to 41.0), respectively; P <0.01). OVS exhibited a higher percentage of chronic hypercapnia (PaCO2> 45 mmHg) (18.6% (95% CI 16.3 to 20.0) versus 6.7% (95% CI 6.11 to 7.32), respectively; P <0.01).

Table 1. Study population.

Variable Items ALL n = 16,466 OSA n = 14,368 Overlap n = 2098 P Missing (%)
Age, yrs, [IQR] 57.7 [48.6;66.1] 56.9 [47.7; 65.1] 63.5 [55.7; 71.7] < .01
Male gender (%) 11,693 (71.2) 10,004 (69.8) 1689 (80.7) < .01 38 (0.2)
Body mass index, kg/m2,median [IQR] 31.1 [27.3; 35.9] 31.1 [27.3; 35.9] 31.1 [27.3; 35.9] 0.72 186 (1.1)
Smoking status Non-smoker 8,019 (48.8) 7,316 (51.0) 703 (33.7) < .01 48 (0.3)
Ex-smoker 5,434 (33.1) 4,495 (31.4) 939 (45.0) .
Smoker 2,965 (18.1) 2,522 (17.6) 443 (21.2) .
Alcohol use, n (%) 816 (5.0) 623 (4.4) 193 (9.3) < .01 87 (0.5)
Sedentarity, n (%) 3,525 (21.5) 3,014 (21.1) 511 (24.5) < .01 81 (0.5)
FEV1/FVC, [IQR] 81 [75; 87] 82 [77; 87.9] 64 [59; 67] < .01
FEV1 (% predicted), [IQR] 95 [83; 106] 97 [86; 107.7] 75 [60; 88.1] < .01
COPD status, n (%) No 14,368 (87.3) 14,368 (100) 0 /
GOLD Stage 1 863 (5.2) 0 863 (41.1)
GOLD Stage 2 976 (5.9) 0 976 (46.5)
GOLD Stages 3 & 4 259 (1.6) 0 259 (12.3)
Apnea-hypopnea index, [IQR] 34 [24; 50.6] 33.1 [23.3; 50] 36 [25; 52] < .01 16 (0.1)
Oxygen desaturation index, [IQR] 26 [14.; 45.2] 25.2 [14; 45] 28 [15; 48] < .01 2988 (18.1)
Mean nocturnal Sa02, [IQR] 93 [91; 94] 93 [91.3; 94] 92 [90; 93.8] < .01 3571 (21.7)
Sleep examination, n (%) Polysomnography 6,200 (39.8) 5,323 (39.1) 877 (44.1) < .01 870 (5.3)
Polygraphy 9,396 (60.2) 8,285 (60.9) 1,111 (55.9) .
pH, [IQR] 7.4 [7.4; 7.5] 7.4 [7.4; 7.5] 7.4 [7.4; 7.5] 0.06 10,256 (62.3)
PaCO2, mmHg [IQR] 38 [35.8; 41] 38 [35.6; 41] 39 [36; 43] < .01 8748 (53.1)
PaCO2≥ 45 mmHg, n(%) 649 (8.4) 445 (6.7) 204 (18.6) < .01 8748 (53.1)
PaO2, mmHg [IQR] 79 [71; 85.8] 79 [72; 86] 74.1 [67; 81.1] < .01 8726 (53)

OSA = obstructive sleep apnea, FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in 1 second, FVC = forced vital capacity.

Anthropometric factors and exposures associated with OVS

Older age, male gender, higher exposure to cigarette smoke and alcohol and reduced reported physical activity were associated with OVS. After adjustment for confounders, the same clinical factors remained associated with OVS in the multivariable analysis, except for reduced physical activity. Table 2 shows the results of the univariable and multivariable logistic regression models depicting factors associated with OVS.

Table 2. Predictors of OVS in the study population.

Variable Univariable analysis OR [95% CI] P Multivariable analysis OR [95% CI] P
Age (10 years) 1.56 [1.50; 1.63] <0.01 1.64 [1.58; 1.72] <0.01
Gender (men) 1.80 [1.61; 2.02] <0.01 1.46 [1.29; 1.65] <0.01
Smoking status Non-smoker 1 <0.01 1 <0.01
Ex-smoker 2.14 [1.93; 2.38] 1.83 [1.64; 2.04]
Smoker 1.80 [1.59; 2.05] 2.45 [2.14; 2.82]
Peripheral arteriopathy 3.31 [2.66; 4.11] <0.01 1.88 [1.50; 2.35] <0.01
Alcohol 2.24 [1.89; 2.65] <0.01 1.69 [1.4; 2.02] <0.01
Apnea-hypopnea index (event/hour) <24 1 <0.01
[24; 34] 1.02 [0.89; 1.17]
[34; 50.6] 1.26 [1.10; 1.43]
≥50.6 1.24 [1.09; 1.41]
Sedentarity 1.21 [1.09; 1.35] <0.01
Hyperlipidemia 1.25 [1.14; 1.38] <0.01
Hypertension 1.46 [1.33; 1.60] <0.01
Coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction 1.91 [1.66; 2.19] <0.01
Heart failure 2.06 [1.63; 2.62] <0.01
Stroke 1.53 [1.21; 1.93] <0.01
Diabetes 1.47 [1.31; 1.66] <0.01
Sleepiness at the wheel 0.85 [0.77; 0.93] <0.01
Nocturia 1.26 [1.15; 1.39] <0.01

OVS, overlap syndrome

Symptoms and clinical presentation of OVS compared to OSA

Usual symptoms related to sleep-disordered breathing were generally less reported in the OVS population compared to classical OSA, whereas the severity of AHI was in the same range (Table 3). A lower proportion of OVS patients complained of snoring, morning headaches and excessive daytime sleepiness as measured by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (median score: 9 [IQR 6 to 13] versus 10 [IQR 6 to 13], respectively; P <0.02). Similarly, a lower proportion of OVS patients (35.6% [95% CI 33.6 to 37.7]) experienced sleepiness while driving compared to OSA patients (39.4% [95% CI 38.6 to 40.3]; P <0.01). There were no differences between groups regarding dyspnea and fatigue as measured by dedicated scales. In contrast, 63.5% (95% CI 61.4 to 65.6) of the OVS population experienced nocturia compared to 58.0% (95% CI 57.2 to 58.8) of the OSA population; P <0.01.

Table 3. Symptoms and clinical presentation of OVS compared to OSA.

Variable Items ALL n = 16,466 OSA n = 14,368 Overlap n = 2098 P
Depression 2,217 (13.5) 1,966 (13.7) 251 (12.1) 0.04
Snoring 15,296 (92.9) 13,393 (93.2) 1,903 (90.7) <0.01
Sleepiness at the wheel 6,411 (38.9) 5,665 (39.4) 746 (35.6) <0.01
Near-miss accidents 449 (2.8) 398 (2.8) 51 (2.5) 0.39
Epworth Sleepiness Scale 10 [6; 13] 10 [6; 13] 9 [6; 13] 0.02
Pichot’s Fatigue Scale 12 [6; 19] 12 [6; 19] 12 [6; 19] 0.08
Morning tiredness 11,931 (72.5) 10,426 (72.6) 1,505 (71.7) 0.43
Morning headaches 5,933 (36) 5,294 (36.8) 639 (30.5) <0.01
Exertional dyspnea 8,581 (52.1) 7,491 (52.1) 1,090 (52.0) 0.88
Nocturia 9,670 (58.7) 8,337 (58.0) 1,333 (63.5) <0.01
Number of nocturnal urinations 1 2,615 (33.6) 2,334 (34.4) 281 (28.5) <0.01
2 2,781 (35.8) 2,421 (35.7) 360 (36.5)
≥3 2,381 (30.6) 2,035 (30.0) 346 (35.1)
Restless leg syndrome 2,539 (15.6) 2,194 (15.4) 345 (16.6) 0.15

OVS = overlap syndrome, OSA = obstructive sleep apnea.

Cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities

Both patients with OVS and those with OSA experienced a high burden of prevalent cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities. Compared to OSA patients, OVS patients had a higher prevalence of hyperlipidemia (35.0% versus 29.7%; P<0.01), hypertension (53.4% versus 43.8%; P<0.01), stroke (4.3% versus 2.8%; P<0.01), coronary artery diseases/myocardial infarction (13.4% versus 7.4%; P<0.01), peripheral arteriopathy (6.0% versus 1.9%; P<0.01), and heart failure (4.4% versus 2.2%; P<0.01). Table 4 shows the associations by multivariable analyses between cardiometabolic comorbidities in OVS patients compared to OSA patients as a reference. After adjustment for age, gender, BMI, exposure to cigarette smoke and AHI, peripheral arterial disease remained associated with OVS patients (odds ratio 1.88; 95% CI 1.50 to 2.36; P < .01). Table 5 and Fig 2 provide a numerical and graphical illustration of how OSA and COPD interact to impact on cardiovascular health. The probability of having hypertension was higher in severe OSA (AHI ≥30) compared to moderate OSA (AHI <30), but was not impacted by COPD. In moderate and severe OSA, COPD was associated with a higher probability of having coronary heart disease, heart failure and, particularly, peripheral arteriopathy in a dose-response relationship. Finally, irrespective of its severity, COPD did not increase the prevalence of stroke in OSA (P = 0.89).

Table 4. Effect of OVS on associated comorbidities in a multivariable logistic regression model.

Variable OR [95% CI] P value
Hyperlipidemia 0.91 [0.82; 1.01] 0.0722
Hypertension 0.98 [0.89; 1.09] 0.7502
Stroke 1.07 [0.84; 1.36] 0.5925
Coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction 1.1 [0.95; 1.28] 0.2115
Peripheral arteriopathy 1.91 [1.52; 2.4] <0.0001
Heart failure 1.27 [0.99; 1.62] 0.0644

*Odds ratio (OR) is the effect of overlap syndrome (OVS) on different cardiovascular comorbidities after adjustment for age, gender, body mass index, exposure to cigarette smoke, the apnea-hypopnea index and the type of sleep study (type III or type I).

Table 5. Effect of COPD and OSA on associated comorbidities in multivariable logistic regression.

Variable OR [95% CI] P value
Hypertension AHI<30 COPD stage 1 0.82 [0.64; 1.06] <0.0001
COPD stage 2 1.33 [1.04; 1.69]
COPD stages 3 & 4 0.81 [0.52; 1.26]
AHI≥30 no COPD 1.42 [1.32; 1.53]
COPD stage 1 1.3 [1.09; 1.56]
COPD stage 2 1.7 [1.43; 2.02]
COPD stages 3 & 4 1.61 [1.16; 2.23]
Peripheral arteriopathy AHI<30 COPD stage 1 1.18 [0.53; 2.61] <0.0001
COPD stage 2 2.91 [1.79; 4.74]
COPD stages 3 & 4 2.92 [1.27; 6.7]
AHI≥30 no COPD 1.31 [0.99; 1.72]
COPD stage 1 2.24 [1.44; 3.5]
COPD stage 2 2.4 [1.6; 3.59]
COPD stages 3 & 4 2.42 [1.27; 4.63]
Heart failure AHI<30 COPD stage 1 1.06 [0.53 2.14] 0.0005
COPD stage 2 1.58 [0.93; 2.69]
COPD stages 3 & 4 2.48 [1.14; 5.42]
AHI≥30 no COPD 0.92 [0.72; 1.17]
COPD stage 1 0.43 [0.22; 0.87]
COPD stage 2 1.4 [0.93; 2.1]
COPD stages 3 & 4 2.16 [1.16; 3.99]
Coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction AHI<30 COPD stage 1 0.76 [0.48; 1.23] 0.0156
COPD stage 2 1.02 [0.7; 1.49]
COPD stages 3 & 4 1.31 [0.69; 2.46]
AHI≥30 no COPD 1.15 [1; 1.33]
COPD stage 1 1.13 [0.85; 1.5]
COPD stage 2 1.41 [1.09; 1.81]
COPD stages 3 & 4 1.88 [1.24; 2.86]
Stroke AHI<30 COPD stage 1 1.36 [0.75; 2.45] 0.8969
COPD stage 2 1.26 [0.72; 2.2]
COPD stages 3 & 4 1.13 [0.4; 3.17]
AHI≥30 no COPD 1.1 [0.88; 1.36]
COPD stage 1 0.91 [0.56; 1.48]
COPD stage 2 1.22 [0.81; 1.84]
COPD stages 3 & 4 0.91 [0.39; 2.12]

*The odds ratio (OR) assesses the effect of COPD and OSA severity on comorbidities by using a logistic regression adjusted on age, gender, exposure to cigarette smoke and the type of sleep study (type III or type I). Patients with moderate sleep apnea and no COPD serve as reference.

AHI, apnea-hypopnea index

Fig 2. Graphic illustration of how OSA and COPD interact to impact on cardiovascular health.

Fig 2

The probability of having hypertension was higher in severe OSA (AHI ≥30) compared to non-severe OSA (AHI <30) and was not impacted by COPD. In moderate-to-severe OSA, COPD was associated with a higher probability of having coronary heart disease, heart failure, particularly peripheral arteriopathy, in a dose-response relationship. COPD did not increase the prevalence of stroke in OSA, irrespective of its severity. Odd ratios are adjusted on age, gender and smoking status. Numerical data are provided in Table 4.

A subgroup analysis in patients diagnosed by respiratory polygraphy or polysomnography yielded to similar results.

Discussion

In this large real-life population of more than 16,000 patients with moderate-to-severe OSA with available spirometry data, the prevalence of OVS was 13%. The burden of symptoms related to sleep-disordered breathing was significantly reduced in OVS compared to OSA alone, although the AHI scores were in the same range and nocturnal hypoxemia was more pronounced. A significant percentage of OSA patients with hypercapnia were obese representing an obesity hypoventilation population included in the general OSA population. After careful consideration of confounders, we suggest that COPD, in addition to moderate or severe OSA, does not have the same impact on the different facets of cardiovascular disease. Prevalence of coronary heart disease, heart failure and peripheral arteriopathy were increased, but we did not observe any effect of COPD on prevalent hypertension and stroke in OSA patients.

We found a prevalence of OVS of 13%, which is in line with most recent epidemiological studies of patients with both OSA and COPD. Approximately 1 out of 10 patients with one disorder will have the other disorder by chance alone [31, 32]. This prevalence most probably reflects the fact that pulmonary function tests were offered in a rather large and unselected OSA population. Specific environmental exposures were associated with OVS compared to the OSA population. Tobacco and alcohol consumption were expected to be higher in COPD and might also predispose to the occurrence or worsening of OSA in subjects by increasing upper airway inflammation and altering protective upper airway reflexes [33]. Reduced physical activity and further physical deconditioning perpetuates the COPD vicious circle, but also favors leg edema and rostral night fluid shift, a condition associated with OSA, even in non-obese subjects [34]. In a previous study, we have demonstrated that OSA phenotypes are specifically influenced by the above-mentioned environmental factors [9]. Thus, taking into consideration the patient’s ecosystem will provide a sound basis for personalized medicine and a multimodal management of OSA, including lifestyle interventions and an exercise programme to complement continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment [35].

Whereas OSA severity assessed by AHI was similar in both groups, OVS patients exhibited less symptoms related to sleep-disordered breathing and reported less excessive daytime sleepiness compared to the OSA alone population. It can be hypothesized that a more sedentary lifestyle in OVS patients is associated with less self-perceived excessive daytime sleepiness. This difference regarding sleepiness is statistically significant but under the Epworth Sleepiness Scale minimum Clinically Important Difference of -2 or -3 [36,37]. Conversely, nocturia, which disrupts sleep continuity and impacts on daytime sleepiness, was more frequent in the OVS group. Nocturia is a ubiquitous phenomenon associated with several chronic disease and reflects an increased burden of sympathetic activity [38]. It is also an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality [39]. Thus, the higher prevalence of nocturia and increased number of voids in our OVS population might reflect an increase in sympathetic activity and raised cardiovascular risk. Fatigue and dyspnea complaints were similar between groups. This can probably be explained by the fact that the two chronic diseases are associated with these complaints, but potentially for different reasons and by different mechanisms. Our data are in line with previous small observational studies [11, 20] showing that classical OSA symptoms are less sensitive to diagnose OSA in COPD. Differences in the burden of symptoms between groups were statistically significant, but too small to suspect or to rule out COPD in single individuals. Other diagnostic methods incorporating pulmonary function tests [10, 11] or high-resolution computed tomography imaging [12] should be designed and validated to identify OSA in COPD populations.

While BMI was in the same range in both groups, nocturnal hypoxia was of greater severity and nearly 20% of OVS patients presented with increased daytime PaCO2. A recent study evidenced that a hypoxic burden in OSA strongly predicts cardiovascular disease-related mortality [40]. Diurnal and nocturnal hypoxemia of COPD is also associated with elevated sympathetic nerve activity, which is probably linked to an increased cardiovascular risk [40]. This is of particular importance when considering the cardiovascular risk in OVS patients [22]. Previous observational studies have suggested a synergistic impact of COPD and OSA on cardiovascular disease [21, 22, 41, 42, 43]. Although these studies generally reported a higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease in OVS, they were flawed by small sample sizes and poor characterization of the respective contribution of OSA and COPD. A recent review [44] stated that “careful consideration of the severity of both OSA and COPD is required when determining the significance of OVS as a clinically relevant entity” associated with hard outcomes. This is the case in our current dataset demonstrating that decreasing lung function, in addition to moderate-to-severe OSA, had different effects on different cardiovascular traits. However, it is difficult to speculate why an increasing severity of COPD increased the prevalence of coronary heart disease, heart failure and peripheral arteriopathy in a dose-response manner, while prevalent hypertension and stroke seemed not to be affected. Available evidence only suggests that sympathetic activation associated with OSA is more important in systemic hypertension [45], whereas systemic inflammation associated with COPD may play a greater role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease [46].

Our study has several strengths and limitations. We report here the largest OVS population to date. Both OSA and COPD severity were objectively assessed and allowed subgroup analyses. In such a well-maintained registry, a careful analysis of confounders allowed reporting an association between COPD and cardiovascular health in OSA patients [47] but causality remains to be firmly established by incident data and randomized controlled trials as our study design only allows generating hypothesis. A selection bias is possible since pulmonary function tests were conducted only in a large subset of patients, but not in the whole population referred for a suspicion of OSA [30]. However, a prevalence of OVS around 13% and an analysis of the clinical characteristics of 16,466 OSA patients with available spirometry data compared to 30,320 OSA patients without spirometry data did not bring to light major differences between populations to support a significant selection bias. Regarding dataset, we acknowledge two more limitations: (i) the majority of centers were using a 3% desaturation and a micro arousal ending the event for hypopneas scoring during polysomnography and reduced flow associated with a 3% desaturation for hypopnea scoring during type III sleep recording. Owing to the size of the registry it was impossible to use a centralized scoring for all sleep studies but we did not observe major differences in AHI between polysomnography and type III sleep recording (not reported); (ii) no detailed information on the type of stroke was available in this large registry.

Conclusions

We found evidence that comorbid COPD is minimally symptomatic for sleep-disordered breathing but exhibit higher odds for coronary heart disease, heart failure and peripheral arteriopathy. Owing to this specific clinical presentation, new diagnostic tools should be developed to target this particular phenotype to CPAP treatment in order to improve cardiovascular outcome. Randomized controlled trials comparing clinical outcomes among OVS patients with OSA treated with CPAP versus OVS patients with untreated OSA are highly desirable.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Clinical characteristics and cardiovascular comorbidities of patients without and with available spirometry data.

(DOCX)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by an unrestricted grant from “Appel d’offre cohorte-fondation du souffle” (SRC_2017) to JLP and RT. RT and JLP are supported by a research grant from the French National Research Agency (ANR-12-TECS-0010) in the framework of the “Investissements d’avenir” programme (ANR-15-IDEX-02) and the “e-health and integrated care” Chair of excellence of the University Grenoble Alpes Foundation. DA is supported by research grant LPS-16/12 from the “Ligue Pulmonaire Suisse” to conduct a programme entitled “integrated care of patients surviving acute hypercapnic respiratory failure in the ICU."

References

  • 1.Vogelmeier CF, Criner GJ, Martinez FJ, Anzueto A, Barnes PJ, Bourbeau J, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease 2017 report. GOLD executive summary. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2017;195(5):557–82. 10.1164/rccm.201701-0218PP [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Malhotra A, Orr JE, Owens RL. On the cutting edge of obstructive sleep apnoea: where next? The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 2015;3(5):397–403. 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00051-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lévy P, Kohler M, McNicholas WT, Barbe F, McEvoy RD, Somers VK, et al. Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. Nature reviews Disease primers. 2015;1:15015 10.1038/nrdp.2015.15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Malhotra A, Schwartz AR, Schneider H, Owens RL, DeYoung P, Han MK, et al. Research Priorities in Pathophysiology for Sleep-disordered Breathing in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2018;197(3):289–99. 10.1164/rccm.201712-2510ST [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Randerath W, Bassetti CL, Bonsignore MR, Farre R, Ferini-Strambi L, Grote L, et al. Challenges and perspectives in obstructive sleep apnoea: report by an ad hoc working group of the sleep disordered breathing group of the european respiratory society and the european sleep research society. European respiratory journal. 2018;52(3):1702616 10.1183/13993003.02616-2017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Joosten SA, Hamza K, Sands S, Turton A, Berger P, Hamilton G. Phenotypes of patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnoea as confirmed by cluster analysis. Respirology. 2012;17(1):99–107. 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.02037.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lacedonia D, Carpagnano GE, Sabato R, Storto MMl, Palmiotti GA, Capozzi V, et al. Characterization of obstructive sleep apnea–hypopnea syndrome (OSA) population by means of cluster analysis. Journal of sleep research. 2016;25(6):724–30. 10.1111/jsr.12429 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ye L, Pien GW, Ratcliffe SJ, Björnsdottir E, Arnardottir ES, Pack AI, et al. The different clinical faces of obstructive sleep apnoea: a cluster analysis. European Respiratory Journal. 2014:erj00323–2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bailly S, Destors M, Grillet Y, Richard P, Stach B, Vivodtzev I, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea: a cluster analysis at time of diagnosis. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0157318 10.1371/journal.pone.0157318 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Adler D, Dupuis-Lozeron E, Janssens JP, Soccal PM, Lador F, Brochard L, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea in patients surviving acute hypercapnic respiratory failure is best predicted by static hyperinflation. PloS one. 2018;13(10):e0205669 10.1371/journal.pone.0205669 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Soler X, Liao S-Y, Marin JM, Lorenzi-Filho G, Jen R, DeYoung P, et al. Age, gender, neck circumference, and Epworth sleepiness scale do not predict obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): The challenge to predict OSA in advanced COPD. PloS one. 2017;12(5):e0177289 10.1371/journal.pone.0177289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Krachman SL, Tiwari R, Vega ME, Yu D, Soler X, Jaffe F, et al. Effect of Emphysema Severity on the Apnea–Hypopnea Index in Smokers with Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 2016;13(7):1129–35. 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201511-765OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chaouat A, Weitzenblum E, Krieger J, Ifoundza T, Oswald M, Kessler R. Association of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and sleep apnea syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;151(1):82–6. 10.1164/ajrccm.151.1.7812577 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Weitzenblum E, Chaouat A, Kessler R, Canuet M. Overlap syndrome: obstructive sleep apnea in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2008;5(2):237–41. 10.1513/pats.200706-077MG [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.McNicholas WT. COPD-OSA Overlap Syndrome: Evolving Evidence Regarding Epidemiology, Clinical Consequences, and Management. Chest. 2017;152(6):1318–26. 10.1016/j.chest.2017.04.160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.McNicholas WT. Does Associated Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Increase Morbidity and Mortality in Obstructive Sleep Apnea?: American Thoracic Society; 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Vernooy JH, Küçükaycan M, Jacobs JA, Chavannes NH, Buurman WA, Dentener MA, et al. Local and systemic inflammation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: soluble tumor necrosis factor receptors are increased in sputum. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2002;166(9):1218–24. 10.1164/rccm.2202023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ryan S, Taylor CT, McNicholas WT. Selective activation of inflammatory pathways by intermittent hypoxia in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Circulation. 2005;112(17):2660–7. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.556746 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ryan S, Taylor CT, McNicholas WT. Predictors of elevated nuclear factor-κB–dependent genes in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2006;174(7):824–30. 10.1164/rccm.200601-066OC [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Adler D, Pépin J-L, Dupuis-Lozeron E, Espa-Cervena K, Merlet-Violet R, Muller H, et al. Comorbidities and subgroups of patients surviving severe acute hypercapnic respiratory failure in the intensive care unit. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2017;196(2):200–7. 10.1164/rccm.201608-1666OC [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Putcha N, Crainiceanu C, Norato G, Samet J, Quan SF, Gottlieb DJ, et al. Influence of lung function and sleep-disordered breathing on all-cause mortality. A community-based study. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2016;194(8):1007–14. 10.1164/rccm.201511-2178OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kendzerska T, Leung RS, Aaron SD, Ayas N, Sandoz JS, Gershon AS, et al. Cardiovascular Outcomes and All-Cause Mortality in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (Overlap Syndrome). Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 2018(ja). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Marin JM, Soriano JB, Carrizo SJ, Boldova A, Celli BR. Outcomes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and obstructive sleep apnea: the overlap syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182(3):325–31. 10.1164/rccm.200912-1869OC [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Borel JC, Tamisier R, Dias-Domingos S, Sapene M, Martin F, Stach B, et al. Type of mask may impact on continuous positive airway pressure adherence in apneic patients. PloS one. 2013;8(5):e64382 10.1371/journal.pone.0064382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Galerneau L-M, Pépin J-L, Borel A-L, Chabre O, Sapene M, Stach B, et al. Acromegaly in sleep apnoea patients: a large observational study of 755 patients. European Respiratory Journal. 2016;48(5):1489–92. 10.1183/13993003.01229-2016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Berry RB, Budhiraja R, Gottlieb DJ, Gozal D, Iber C, Kapur VK, et al. Rules for scoring respiratory events in sleep: update of the 2007 AASM manual for the scoring of sleep and associated events. Journal of clinical sleep medicine. 2012;8(05):597–619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Corral J, Sánchez-Quiroga M-Á, Carmona-Bernal C, Sánchez-Armengol Á, Torre ASdl, Durán-Cantolla J, et al. Conventional Polysomnography Is Not Necessary for the Management of Most Patients with Suspected Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Noninferiority, Randomized Controlled Trial. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2017;196(9):1181–90. 10.1164/rccm.201612-2497OC [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chai-Coetzer CL, McEvoy RD. The Debate Should Now Be Over: Simplified Cardiorespiratory Sleep Tests Are a Reliable, Cost-Saving Option for Diagnosing Obstructive Sleep Apnea. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2017;196(9):1096–8. 10.1164/rccm.201706-1199ED [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vat S, Haba-Rubio J, Tafti M, Tobback N, Andries D, Heinzer R. Scoring criteria for portable monitor recordings: a comparison of four hypopnoea definitions in a population-based cohort. Thorax. 2015:thoraxjnl-2014-205982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.SdPdL F. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique. Syndrome d'apnées hypopnées obstructives du sommeil de l'adulte. Revue des Maladies Respiratoires. 2010;27:806–33. 10.1016/j.rmr.2010.05.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sharma B, Feinsilver S, Owens RL, Malhotra A, McSharry D, Karbowitz S. Obstructive airway disease and obstructive sleep apnea: effect of pulmonary function. Lung. 2011;189(1):37–41. 10.1007/s00408-010-9270-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Budhiraja R, Siddiqi TA, Quan SF. Sleep disorders in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: etiology, impact, and management. Journal of clinical sleep medicine: JCSM: official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. 2015;11(3):259–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lévy P, Pépin J-L, Dematteis M. Pharyngeal neuropathy in obstructive sleep apnea: where are we going?: American Thoracic Society; 2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.White LH, Bradley TD. Role of nocturnal rostral fluid shift in the pathogenesis of obstructive and central sleep apnoea. The Journal of Physiology. 2013;591(5):1179–93. 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.245159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Vivodtzev I, Tamisier R, Croteau M, Borel J-C, Grangier A, Wuyam B, et al. Ventilatory support or respiratory muscle training as adjuncts to exercise in obese CPAP-treated patients with obstructive sleep apnoea: a randomised controlled trial. Thorax. 2018;73(7):634–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Patel S, Kon SSC, Nolan CM, Barker RE, Simonds AK, Morrell MJ et al. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale: Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;197(7):961–3. 10.1164/rccm.201704-0672LE [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Crook S, Sievi NA, Bloch KE, Stradling JR, Frei A, Puhan MA et al. Minimum Important Difference of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale in Obstructive Sleep Apnoea: Estimation From Three Randomised Controlled Trials. Thorax. 2019;74(4):390–6. 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-211959 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Destors M, Tamisier R, Sapene M, Grillet Y, Baguet J-P, Richard P, et al. Nocturia is an independent predictive factor of prevalent hypertension in obstructive sleep apnea patients. Sleep medicine. 2015;16(5):652–8. 10.1016/j.sleep.2014.10.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kupelian V, Fitzgerald MP, Kaplan SA, Norgaard JP, Chiu GR, Rosen RC. Association of nocturia and mortality: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The Journal of urology. 2011;185(2):571–7. 10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Azarbarzin A, Sands SA, Stone KL, Taranto-Montemurro L, Messineo L, Terrill PI, et al. The hypoxic burden of sleep apnoea predicts cardiovascular disease-related mortality: the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study and the Sleep Heart Health Study. European heart journal. 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Crinion SJ, Ryan S, McNicholas WT. Obstructive sleep apnoea as a cause of nocturnal nondipping blood pressure: recent evidence regarding clinical importance and underlying mechanisms. Eur Respiratory Soc; 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Haarmann H, Folle J, Nguyen XP, Herrmann P, Heusser K, Hasenfuβ G. Impact of Non-Invasive Ventilation on Sympathetic Nerve Activity in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Lung. 2017;195(1):69–75. 10.1007/s00408-016-9965-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ganga HV, Nair SU, Puppala VK, Miller WL. Risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation in elderly patients with the overlap syndrome: a retrospective cohort study. Journal of geriatric cardiology: JGC. 2013;10(2):129 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5411.2013.02.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Shawon MS, Perret JL, Senaratna CV, Lodge C, Hamilton GS, Dharmage SC. Current evidence on prevalence and clinical outcomes of co-morbid obstructive sleep apnea and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review. Sleep Med Rev. 2017;32:58–68. 10.1016/j.smrv.2016.02.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tamisier R, Pépin JL, Rémy J, Baguet JP, Taylor JA, Weiss JW, et al. 14 nights of intermittent hypoxia elevate daytime blood pressure and sympathetic activity in healthy humans. European Respiratory Journal. 2011;37(1):119–28. 10.1183/09031936.00204209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Decramer M, Janssens W. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and comorbidities. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 2013;1(1):73–83. 10.1016/S2213-2600(12)70060-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lederer DJ, Bell SC, Branson RD, Chalmers JD, Marshall R, Maslove DM, et al. Control of Confounding and Reporting of Results in Causal Inference Studies. Guidance for Authors from Editors of Respiratory, Sleep, and Critical Care Journals. Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 2019;16(1):22–8. 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201808-564PS [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Stelios Loukides

23 Mar 2020

PONE-D-19-30703

Clinical presentation and cardiovascular outcomes of obstructive sleep apnea-COPDoverlap syndrome

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr Adler,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

First of all, receive my apologies for the delayed process. I was the last handling editor and did my best to terminate the process in a proper time schedule. Both reviewers found your work interesting but simultaneously raised some points mainly related to either methodological issues or/and the way that results were presented. 

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by May 07 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Stelios Loukides

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements:

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following in the Financial Disclosure section:

"This study was funded by an unrestricted grant from “Appel d’offre cohorte-fondation du souffle” (SRC_2017). SB, RT and JLP are supported by a research grant from the French National Research Agency (ANR-12-TECS-0010) in the framework of the “Investissements d’avenir” programme (ANR-15-IDEX-02) and the “e-health and integrated care” Chair of excellence of the University Grenoble Alpes Foundation. DA is supported by a research grant from the “Ligue Pulmonaire Suisse” to conduct a programme entitled “integrated care of patients surviving acute hypercapnic respiratory failure in the ICU”."

We note that one or more of the authors are employed by a commercial company: Private Practice Sleep and Respiratory Disease Centre.

  1. Please provide an amended Funding Statement declaring this commercial affiliation, as well as a statement regarding the Role of Funders in your study. If the funding organization did not play a role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript and only provided financial support in the form of authors' salaries and/or research materials, please review your statements relating to the author contributions, and ensure you have specifically and accurately indicated the role(s) that these authors had in your study. You can update author roles in the Author Contributions section of the online submission form.

Please also include the following statement within your amended Funding Statement.

“The funder provided support in the form of salaries for authors [insert relevant initials], but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.”

If your commercial affiliation did play a role in your study, please state and explain this role within your updated Funding Statement.

2. Please also provide an updated Competing Interests Statement declaring this commercial affiliation along with any other relevant declarations relating to employment, consultancy, patents, products in development, or marketed products, etc. 

Within your Competing Interests Statement, please confirm that this commercial affiliation does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to  PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests) . If this adherence statement is not accurate and  there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please include both an updated Funding Statement and Competing Interests Statement in your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Please know it is PLOS ONE policy for corresponding authors to declare, on behalf of all authors, all potential competing interests for the purposes of transparency. PLOS defines a competing interest as anything that interferes with, or could reasonably be perceived as interfering with, the full and objective presentation, peer review, editorial decision-making, or publication of research or non-research articles submitted to one of the journals. Competing interests can be financial or non-financial, professional, or personal. Competing interests can arise in relationship to an organization or another person. Please follow this link to our website for more details on competing interests: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests

3. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This cross-sectional analysis of the French Sleep Apnoea Registry addresses an interesting question, namely how the co-existence of COPD and OSA (Overlap Syndrome) affects symptoms comorbidities compared to OSA alone. The sample size is large, however, the study design introduces a lot of bias that hampers the interpretation of the findings. In addition, statistically significant differences in symptom burden are reported between Overlap Syndrome and COPD alone. However, when looking at the difference and the confidence intervals, there is no clinically relevant difference between the groups. Therefore, the conclusion is not really supported by the data.

The question asked and the data are interesting but the title, the methods (hypothesis, outcomes), the interpretation of the data, the limitations and the conclusions need to be revised thoroughly.

- mean (SD) or median (IQR) AHI, ODI and SpO2 should be reported in the abstract to understand differences in SDB in the two compared populations

- the method section of the abstract should report outcomes of interest and statistical approach

- the difference in ESS between the compared populations is statistically significant but there is no clinically meaningful difference (MCID in ESS 2-3), therefore, the conclusion is not supported by the data

- patients with OSA who are in the French register represent a population referred to a sleep clinic due to suspicion of symptomatic SDB whereas patients with Overlap Syndrome might have undergone a sleep study for a different reason; this introduces a relevant selection bias that hampers the interpretation on differences in sleepiness and associated symptoms

- due to the study design, these results can be used for generating a hypothesis but not more

- the title should be changed to symptoms and comorbidities – delete cardiovascular outcomes); this is a cross-sectional analysis not a longitudinal analysis that looks at how baseline characteristics affect the incidence of cardiovascular events

- it should be discussed which scoring rules have been used during the period analysed (1997-2017); hypopnea definition has changed and this will affect the prevalence of Overlap Syndrome

Reviewer #2: This cross-sectional study evaluates and compares the clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed with OVS and moderate OSA alone, in the largest until now study, retrieved from the French National Sleep Apnea Registry. In addition, emphasis was placed on the impact that COPD may have on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with OSA. COPD diagnosis was based on available spirometric data, while OSA was diagnosed using either PSG or type III cardio-respiratory studies. The percentage of OVS patients out of the total examined OSA population was in accordance with published epidemiological studies on this field (at 13%), whereas OSA related symptoms were less frequently reported in the OVS than the OSA population (apart from nocturnia). Finally, and more importantly, increasing COPD severity, based on GOLD airflow limitation criteria, associated with higher prevalence of CVD, but not with hypertension and stroke after adjustment for significant cofounders.

Major concerns

1. It would be interesting to distinguish between patients diagnosed with PSG or type III studies and to perform the same analyses. The findings of this proposed subgroup analysis may explain possible differences regarding the impact of COPD on prevalent hypertension as well as other important findings such as symptoms related to OSA between investigated groups.

2. The authors should consider the fact that hypercapnic OSA patients (6.7% of the patients in this study) may have obesity hypoventilation syndrome, especially since the reported median BMI is 31.1 kg/m2. FVC values could also be helpful in this. I would suggest to add this this, at least as a limitation because those patients may not represent a “pure” OSA population.

3. It would be also useful to better define COPD, underling the fact that included patients should be ≥40 years and have a history and symptoms compatible with a COPD diagnosis. How the authors explain that 33.7% of the OVS patients were non-smokers?

4. The authors should also add minimum SaO2 values dying sleep in Table 1. They should also remove peripheral arteriopathy from Table1 or to add other comorbidities.

5. In the present study, OVS was not associated with prevalent stroke. Were there any available data regarding the subtypes of stroke in this study (i.e. ischaemic or haemorragic)? Actually, COPD may especially increase the risk of hemorrhagic stroke, while the risk of ischemic stroke in COPD patients could be confounded by other parameters. Similarly, non- significant effect of COPD on prevalent hypertension may be hard to explain. Nevertheless, moderate to severe and very severe COPD are all associated with multimorbidity, making it difficult to find any difference in prevalent hypertension.

Minor concerns

1. The authors state that “Randomized controlled trials comparing clinical outcomes among OVS patients with OSA treated with CPAP versus OVS patients with untreated OSA are highly desirable.”

Although RCTs are the cornerstone of medical evidence and explain causality, they are hard to be implemented in daily practice due to ethics concerns regarding treatment of OSA. Thus, real life studies, as the present one, could offer important evidence on the field of OVS.

2. Discussion section: the authors state that “Sustained hypoxemia may also adequately assess the degree of sympathetic activity.” They should provide more clarifications and references.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Paschalis Steiropoulos

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Decision Letter 1

Stelios Loukides

15 Jun 2020

Clinical presentation and comorbidities of obstructive sleep apnea- COPD overlap syndrome

PONE-D-19-30703R1

Dear Dr. Adler,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Stelios Loukides

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Reviewer‘s comments have been addressed. The new version is fine and these registry data are of interest and should be made available to our research community

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Esther Irene Schwarz

Reviewer #2: Yes: Paschalis Steiropoulos

Acceptance letter

Stelios Loukides

18 Jun 2020

PONE-D-19-30703R1

Clinical presentation and comorbidities of obstructive sleep apnea-COPD overlap syndrome

Dear Dr. Adler:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr Stelios Loukides

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Clinical characteristics and cardiovascular comorbidities of patients without and with available spirometry data.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Responses to reviewers PLoS one Overlap JLP.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES