Abstract
The OX40-OX40L pathway provides crucial co-stimulatory signals for CD4 T cell responses, however the precise cellular interactions critical for OX40L provision in vivo and when these occur, remains unclear. Here, we demonstrate that provision of OX40L by dendritic cells (DCs), but not T cells, B cells nor group 3 innate lymphoid cells (ILC3s), is critical specifically for the effector Th1 response to an acute systemic infection with Listeria monocytogenes (Lm). OX40L expression by DCs is regulated by cross-talk with NK cells, with IFNγ signalling to the DC to enhance OX40L in a mechanism conserved in both mouse and human DCs. Strikingly, DC expression of OX40L is redundant in a chronic intestinal Th1 response and expression by ILC3s is necessary. Collectively these data reveal tissue specific compartmentalisation of the cellular provision of OX40L and define a mechanism controlling DC expression of OX40L in vivo.
Subject terms: Immunology, Microbiology
The OX40-OX40L axis is a crucial component of the costimulatory requirement of CD4 T cell responses. Here, the authors show context and cell type specific expression of OX40L for driving Th1 cell generation during acute and chronic models of infection.
Introduction
Productive T cell responses require interactions between costimulatory molecules in addition to signals conveyed through T cell receptor (TCR) engagement of peptide:major histocompatibility complex (MHC) complexes. Members of the tumour necrosis factor (TNF) receptor super family (TNFRSF) play critical roles in shaping T cell responses through sustaining proliferation, enhancing survival and directing cellular differentiation1–5. CD4 T cell responses are particularly reliant on OX406, with OX40−/− and OX40L−/− mice, alongside OX40−/− TCR transgenic T cells, all implicating OX40 signals in effector memory responses7–9. Furthermore, a human patient lacking functional OX40 expression was unable to make rapid effector cytokines upon challenge10, entirely consistent with the CD4 T cell defects observed in OX40−/− mice. Thus OX40 signals are thought to be critical in both generating effector CD4 T cell responses and the subsequent establishment of CD4 T cell memory. Since OX40 shares signalling pathways with its fellow TNFRSF member CD30, which is also induced upon T cell activation, there is also potential redundancy in the roles of these two molecules2,11–13.
Despite some understanding of the importance of OX40:OX40L at the molecular level, the cellular interactions underpinning provision of this costimulatory signal remain unclear. T helper type 1 (Th1) and Th2 responses are both thought to be OX40 dependent14–18, while the generation of Th17 cells may be inhibited by OX40 signals19. Expression of OX40L has been described on different professional antigen (Ag)-presenting cells20,21 alongside T cells22, innate lymphoid cells23 and also non-haematopoietic populations24,25; thus many different cellular interactions may underpin the phenotypes observed in OX40- and OX40L-deficient mice.
The activation of naive T cells within secondary lymphoid tissue is initiated through T cell interactions with Ag-bearing dendritic cells (DC) within the T zone26–28. Thus DCs are obvious potential providers of costimulatory signals to activated T cells. However, after initial interactions with DCs, activated CD4 T cells migrate to the border between B and T zones and the interfollicular spaces, suggesting that some costimulatory ligands maybe provided by further cellular interactions that occur in distinct tissue microenvironments29. Cells isolated from secondary lymphoid tissue with the highest expression of OX40L were found to be lymphoid tissue-inducer cells (now considered a type of group 3 innate lymphoid cell (ILC3))23 and were located specifically within the interfollicular spaces of lymph nodes (LNs) and the functionally analogous bridging channels of the spleen30,31. Given that these ILC3s were also found to express high levels of CD30L23,32, they might be key providers of costimulatory signals to activated T cells moving through the interfollicular spaces. Such interactions would be consistent with evidence that ILC3s support splenic CD4 T cell responses33. Alternatively or in addition, activated T cells may encounter OX40L expression by B cells14 or other T cells22. The question of whether specific cellular interactions are required after initial priming by DC remains an important mechanistic detail and answering this would facilitate efforts to manipulate CD4 T cell responses in vivo.
Here we use the reporting of effector cytokines by endogenous Ag-specific CD4 T cells to carefully dissect the provision of OX40L in vivo. Our data reveal that OX40:OX40L interactions are critical for the generation of functional Th1 effector cells in the response to acute systemic Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) infection, and using conditional OX40L knockout mice, we show that the expression of OX40L by DCs but not by T cells, B cells or ILC3s was required. Expression of OX40L by DCs is dependent upon crosstalk with natural killer (NK) cells that results in early interferon-γ (IFNγ) production directly signalling to the DCs to upregulate OX40L expression. In contrast, within a chronic intestinal Th1 response, DC OX40L expression is redundant and ILC3 expression of OX40L is required. Together, these studies define distinct cellular providers of OX40L in vivo, revealing that compartmentalisation of these signals, dependent on the nature of the response and the microenvironments, occurs to elicit optimal CD4 effector T cell responses.
Results
IFNγ-producing Th1 effector T cells are OX40 dependent
Studies in humans10 and mice8,34,35 indicate that effector CD4 T cell responses are highly OX40 dependent. To better understand the costimulatory requirements for CD4 effector cell function in vivo, mice deficient in both CD30 and OX40 (CD30−/− × OX40−/−) were crossed with Great × Smart17A dual IFNγ and interleukin (IL)-17A reporter (GS) mice36. This approach enables reporting of cytokine expression without ex vivo manipulation. Furthermore, when combined with assessment of endogenous CD4 T cell responses using MHCII tetramers allows for the careful analysis of CD4 T cell function versus impacts on Ag-specific CD4 T cell numbers. Infection with an attenuated Lm expressing the 2W1S peptide (Lm-2W1S) strain was used to model an acute intracellular bacterial infection that could be tracked with 2W1S-specific MHCII tetramers37,38. This well-characterised model provides a robust means to carefully dissect a robust Th1 response in vivo. To assess the impact of CD30 and OX40 deficiency on the effector CD4 T cell response, GS and GS CD30−/− × OX40−/− mice were assessed at 7 days post infection (dpi) with Lm-2W1S, revealing a substantial CD44hi 2W1S-specifc CD4 T cell population in both mouse strains, with the absence of CD30 and OX40 resulting in an approximate 2-fold reduction in total Ag-specific CD4 T cells (Fig. 1a, b). Expression of IFNγ, revealed by enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (eYFP) expression, was restricted to CXCR5− 2W1S-specific T cells38, and notably, eYFP expression was almost completely absent in CXCR5− 2W1S-specific T cells isolated from GS CD30−/− × OX40−/− mice (Fig. 1c, d). In contrast, the number of CXCR5+ follicular 2W1S-specific cells was not significantly changed (Fig. 1e) consistent with previous data that the follicular T cell response to this attenuated Lm strain was not OX40 dependent34. Expression of the Th1 associated transcription factor T-bet was used to identify effector cells that might be unable to produce effector cytokines (Fig. 1f). Numbers of T-bet+CXCR5− 2W1S-specific T cells were reduced approximately 2–3-fold in the absence of CD30 and OX40 (Fig. 1g, h). This is compared to the tenfold loss in eYFP+CXCR5− 2W1S-specific T cells indicating that the most substantial defect in the response is the ability of the cells to make effector cytokines. To determine whether the lack of IFNγ-producing Th1 cells at 7 dpi (the peak of the response) reflected an inability of these cells to survive after initial priming, the response was assessed at 4 dpi. Again, eYFP+ 2W1S-specific CD4 T cells, but not CXCR5+ 2W1S-specific T cells, were heavily reduced in the absence of CD30 and OX40 (Fig. 1i–l) as observed at the peak of the response, suggesting that the effector Th1 cells were not being generated. Combined, these data reveal that, in the primary CD4 T cell response to Lm-2W1S infection, the number of Th1 effector CD4 T cells was reduced in the absence of CD30 and OX40, reflecting the early loss of cytokine-producing Th1 effector cells.
To determine the individual contributions of CD30 and OX40 to the effector T cell response, the 2W1S response at 7 dpi in OX40−/− and CD30−/− × OX40−/− mice was compared (Fig. 2a). Enumeration of total 2W1S-specific CD4 T cells (Fig. 2b), 2W1S-specific Th1 effectors (Fig. 2c, d) and 2W1S-specific CXCR5+ follicular cells (Fig. 2e) revealed that loss of OX40 signals accounted for the defects observed in CD30−/− × OX40−/− mice. Thus, for numbers of Ag-specific T cells at the peak of the response, OX40 expression was key. To determine whether CD30 played a role in the functional capacity of the Th1 effector population, GS mice with only single copies of either CD30 or OX40 (GS OX40−/− CD30−/+ and GS OX40−/+ CD30−/−) were also generated. A single copy of OX40 in the absence of CD30 was sufficient for normal IFNγ (eYFP) production (Fig. 2f, g) and formation of a T-bet+ effector CD4 T cell population (Fig. 2h, i), indicating that these aspects of the response were not CD30 dependent. Combined, these experiments demonstrate that signals through OX40, rather than through CD30, were critical for the primary Th1 response induced by Lm-2W1S infection. While OX40L is the only reported ligand for OX40, we confirmed that observations made in OX40−/− mice were consistent with mice lacking OX40L by crossing OX40Lf/f mice39 with PGKcre mice (which express cre recombinase ubiquitously) to generate a total OX40L-deficient mouse model. As anticipated, total OX40−/− or PGKcre × OX40Lf/f mice showed a comparable disruption of the effector Th1 response (Fig. 2j–l).
DC expression of OX40L is required in systemic Th1 response
The specific cellular providers of OX40L signals within secondary lymphoid tissue remain to be elucidated, with professional Ag-presenting cells, T cells and ILC populations all possible sources in vivo. We hypothesised that in the response to Lm-2W1S there was a critical cellular provider of OX40L signals that underpinned the CD4 effector T cell response. To test this, OX40Lf/f mice were crossed with multiple cell-specific cre strains to target DCs, ILC3s, T cells and B cells, since all of these have been reported to express OX40L5. Specific deletion of OX40L expression on the appropriate populations was confirmed through analysis of splenocytes ex vivo alongside fate-mapping of cre expression (Supplementary Fig. 1). Given their expression of OX40L23,32, positioning in lymphoid tissue31 and support for splenic CD4 T cell responses33, we first hypothesised that ILC3 expression of OX40L was required for functional Th1 responses. To test this, Rorccre versus Rorccre × OX40Lf/f mice were infected with Lm-2W1S and assessed at 7 dpi, alongside OX40−/− controls. Strikingly, no defect was observed in the 2W1S-specific response when ILC3 lacked OX40L (Fig. 3a–c), indicating that ILC3 provision of OX40L was not required for the generation of effector Th1 responses in the spleen. Given that the defect in the Th1 effector response was established by 4 dpi, we hypothesised that DCs were the critical source of OX40L signal in vivo. To first confirm that the 2W1S-specific response to Lm-2W1S was dependent upon interactions with DCs, MHCII expression by DCs was deleted using CD11ccre × H2Ab-1f/f mice. As expected, in the absence of MHCII expression on CD11c+ cells, the 2W1S-specific response was completely abrogated (Fig. 3d, e). To then test whether DC provision of OX40L was necessary for normal Th1 effector T cell responses, CD11ccre × OX40Lf/f mice were infected with Lm-2W1S, alongside CD11ccre and CD30−/− × OX40−/− controls. Compared with CD11ccre controls, CD11ccre × OX40Lf/f mice had significantly reduced numbers of 2W1S-specific CD4 T cells at 7 dpi (Fig. 3f, g) due to substantial loss of the T-bet+CXCR5− subset (Fig. 3h–j). Strikingly, the defects in CD11ccre × OX40Lf/f mice were comparable to those observed in CD30−/− × OX40−/− controls, demonstrating that the expression of OX40L by DCs was absolutely required for the Th1 effector response and could account for the impaired Th1 effector response observed in the total absence of CD30 and OX40 signals. While these data clearly establish the importance of OX40L expression by DCs, we sought to further confirm that there was no absolute requirement for provision of OX40L by lymphocytes during the primary response, perhaps acting subsequent to interactions with DCs. Therefore, B cell-specific (Mb1cre) and T cell-specific (CD4cre) conditional OX40L-deficient mice were infected with Lm-2W1S and the 2W1S-specific CD4 T cell response was analysed. No significant differences were observed versus cre-only controls in either strain confirming that there was no requirement for B nor T cell provision of OX40L in vivo for the normal response to Lm-2W1S (Supplementary Fig. 2). Together, these data reveal that, in the primary response to Lm-2W1S, provision of OX40L by a single cellular source, the CD11c+ DCs, is required for the Th1 effector T cell response.
Early IFNγ regulates OX40L expression by DCs
Defining the cellular interaction required for provision of OX40L enabled the investigation into how expression of this key costimulatory pathway was regulated in vivo. The kinetics of DC expression of OX40L was assessed by infecting mice with Lm-2W1S and then analysing splenic DC expression of OX40L at different time points post infection. Although a basal level of OX40L expression by the splenic DCs was evident, Lm-2W1S infection resulted in the rapid upregulation of OX40L expression by 24 h, which then declined to basal levels once more by 72 h post infection (Fig. 4a, b). The dynamics of OX40 expression relative to OX40L expression in the same spleen tissue was then assessed to better understand the relationship between maximal DC expression of the ligand and Ag-specific T cell expression of the receptor (Supplementary Fig. 3). OX40 expression was evident on 2W1S-specific CD4 T cells at 48 h, where approximately 50% of the cells expressed OX40 and many also co-expressed CD25, described to be expressed by early Th1 effector T cells38. The proportion of OX40-expressing 2W1S-specific CD4 T cells peaked at 2 dpi and then rapidly decline such that by 4 dpi the vast majority of the responding CD4 T cells lacked any detectable expression of OX40 and DC expression of OX40L had returned to baseline. Thus the expression of both OX40 and OX40L expression was focused very early in the response and OX40 expression was limited to only a proportion of the responding 2W1S-specific CD4 T cells with a phenotype consistent with Th1 effector cells.
While OX40L expression can be upregulated in vitro by stimulation through CD4021, the rapid upregulation of OX40L expression observed after Lm-2W1S infection suggested that early signals from innate immune cells would precede CD40L expression by activated T cells. Activation of NK cells contributes to robust Th1 responses40–42, and more recently, IFNγ release by activated NK cells was revealed as the mechanism by which an adjuvanted vaccine response enhanced Th1 responses43. Furthermore, crosstalk between NK cells and DCs has been previously identified as a key mechanism through which both populations are fully activated44. To investigate early innate cell production of IFNγ in vivo, GS mice were infected with Lm-2W1S and assessed 24 h later. Gating on NK cells revealed substantial IFNγ expression compared to NK cells from uninfected GS control mice (Fig. 4c, d). Moreover, NK cells were the dominant source (approximately 70%) of IFNγ expression at this time, with T cells contributing most of the remaining signal (Fig. 4e, f). To ask whether this early IFNγ signal was required for upregulation of OX40L on DCs, wild-type (WT) and IFNγ−/− mice were infected with Lm-2W1S and DC expression of OX40L assessed 24 h later. Notably, the upregulation of OX40L expression by DCs isolated from IFNγ−/− mice was impeded compared to WT controls but was higher than the basal level observed in uninfected mice (Fig. 4g). These data indicate that early IFNγ was resulting in the increase in OX40L expression by DCs, but other signals might also contribute. In vitro, Th1 responses to heat-killed Lm required IL-1245,46, and neutralisation of IL-12 in vivo results in reduced resistance to Lm, which could be reversed by recombinant IFNγ47. To assess the requirement for IL-12, IL-12p35−/− mice were infected with Lm-2W1S and assessed 24 h later for NK cell production of IFNγ and OX40L expression by splenic DCs. The proportion of NK cells producing IFNγ (Fig. 4h, i) and the amount of IFNγ produced (Fig. 4j) were significantly reduced in IL-12p35−/− mice and DC upregulation of OX40L was impaired (Fig. 4k, l), indicating that IL-12-mediated NK cell expression of IFNγ was linked to DC OX40L expression. We further confirmed that expression of IL-12 mRNA was equally upregulated by DCs from CD11ccre × OX40Lf/f and OX40Lf/f littermate controls after infection with Lm-2W1S (Supplementary Fig. 4), indicating that IL-12 production by OX40L-deficient DCs was not impaired and the loss of Th1 effector cells not due to impaired polarisation during priming.
Since the activation of NK cells can occur subsequent to the rapid activation of invariant NK T (iNKT) cells and mediated through very early iNKT expression of IFNγ48, we assessed the requirement for iNKT cell activation using CD1d−/− mice. WT, CD1d−/− and IFNγ−/− mice were infected with Lm-2W1S, and NK cell IFNγ expression was assessed 24 h later. NK cells from CD1d−/− mice showed comparable IFNγ expression to NK cells from WT controls (Fig. 4m, n). Furthermore, DC expression of OX40L was also not impaired in CD1d−/− mice (Fig. 4o). Combined, these data reveal that iNKT cells are not required for IFNγ production by NK cells in response to Lm-2W1S and highlight the importance of IFNγ in enhancing DC expression of OX40L.
IFNγ produced by NK cells signals directly to DCs
To investigate whether IFNγ could directly upregulate OX40L expression by DCs, splenocytes were cultured in vitro with recombinant IFNγ alongside anti-CD40 antibodies (Abs) as a positive control21. Culture with IFNγ induced robust upregulation of OX40L expression by DCs (Fig. 5a, b), suggesting that IFNγ might directly stimulate OX40L expression via signals through the IFNγR. To test this in vivo, CD11ccre × IFNγRf/f mice were generated and infected with Lm-2W1S alongside CD11ccre and IFNγ−/− controls. DCs isolated from either CD11ccre × IFNγRf/f or total IFNγ−/− mice expressed significantly less OX40L than controls (Fig. 5c, d). Flow cytometric analysis of IFNγR expression by CD11c+ DCs confirmed efficient deletion of this receptor in CD11ccre × IFNγRf/f mice (Fig. 5e). Finally, DCs from CD11ccre × IFNγRf/f mice cultured with recombinant IFNγ failed to upregulate OX40L to the level observed for WT controls (Fig. 5f, g). Combined, these data indicate a mechanism where DC-expressed IL-12 instructs NK production of IFNγ, which then directly signals back to the DC to enhance OX40L expression and orchestrate the generation of a robust Th1 effector T cell response.
Although NK cells were the largest population of IFNγ-expressing cells, CD3+ IFNγ+ cells were evident 24 h after infection with Lm-2W1S raising the possibility that multiple sources of IFNγ expression contributed to DC activation. To better understand the spatial distribution of IFNγ-producing cells in the spleen after Lm infection, IFNγ expression was localised in tissue sections 24 h post infection. Expression of IFNγ was detected within some white pulp areas of the spleen of infected mice (Supplementary Fig. 5). Both IFNγ+ NK cells and IFNγ+ CD8 T cells were detected in approximately equal frequency in the proximity of DCs in the splenic white pulp (Fig. 6a, b). To specifically test in vivo whether NK cells were a critical source of IFNγ, mice were treated with either anti-NK1.1 Abs alone or in combination with anti-CD8 Abs, then infected with Lm-2W1S and analysed 24 h later. Depletion of the targeted cells and a loss IFNγ expression among this population was confirmed by flow cytometry (Supplementary Fig. 6), and the expected reduction in IFNγ expression was observed when splenocytes were analysed after ex vivo culture in the presence of brefeldin A (Fig. 6c–e). Importantly, depletion of NK cells resulted in the impaired upregulation of OX40L expression by DCs, comparable to that observed in IFNγ−/− controls (Fig. 6f), indicating that NK cells were a critical in vivo source of the cytokine. Given the proximity of IFNγ+ CD8 T cells to DCs in the splenic white pulp of Lm-2W1S-infected mice, mice were also treated with a combination of anti-NK1.1 and anti-CD8 Abs; however, this did not significantly reduce the OX40L expression by DCs further.
While our data indicated an important role for IFNγ in regulating OX40L expression, the OX40L expression by DC when IFNγ signalling was disrupted remained higher than in uninfected mice, indicating that other signals likely contributed to the upregulation of this ligand. To investigate this further, we employed in vitro cultures of splenocytes to screen other cytokines that could boost the expression of OX40L by DCs. Splenocytes from WT and IFNγ−/− mice were compared in parallel to help determine potentially indirect effects via stimulating IFNγ expression in the cultures. Notably, basal expression of OX40L in IFNγ−/− splenocyte cultures was lower than in WT controls. Recombinant IFNγ robustly upregulated OX40L expression as observed previously, but both IL-18 and TNFα were identified as further cytokines that could enhance OX40L expression by DCs in this assay (Supplementary Fig. 7).
NK cell-derived IFNγ upregulates OX40L on human DCs
Having identified how DC expression of OX40L in response to Lm-2W1S infection was controlled in vivo, we sought to confirm that this pathway was conserved in human DCs. Human cDC2 were isolated to high purity by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and then cultured alone or with autologous FACS-isolated NK cells (Supplementary Fig. 8). Under these conditions, recombinant human IFNγ was sufficient to significantly enhance OX40L expression consistent with direct effects of this cytokine on human cDC2 (Fig. 7a–c). Activation of NK cells in co-culture with cDC2 through addition of IL-12 and IL-15 was also able to enhance OX40L expression to similar levels as the recombinant IFNγ. Thus the mechanism of direct IFNγ signalling to DCs resulting from crosstalk with NK cells would also appear to operate for human DCs.
DC expression of OX40L redundant in intestinal Th1 response
Our data have revealed that OX40L expression by DCs, licenced by early crosstalk with NK cells, is sufficient for Th1 cell expansion and function in a model of acute systemic bacterial infection. To ask whether this mechanism was specific to the splenic response observed with Lm-2W1S infection, we sought to test the requirement for DC OX40L under quite different experimental conditions. To this end, we established an oral Salmonella infection model using an attenuated Salmonella-2W1S strain49, thus enabling tracking of the same endogenous 2W1S-specific CD4 T cell response within the draining secondary lymphoid tissue (mesenteric LNs (mLNs)) and the non-lymphoid effector site (colon). Having established that OX40L expression by ILC3s was not required in the response to Lm-2W1S, the Salmonella infection model provided an opportunity to further test the potential role of ILC3s in supporting CD4 T cells at mucosal sites via their expression of OX40L50. Thus CD11ccre × OX40Lf/f and Rorccre × OX40Lf/f mice, alongside littermate OX40Lf/f only and OX40-deficient controls, were infected, and the 2W1S-specific response was assessed 7 days later in the colon (Fig. 8a). To aid assessment of cytokine production, the different OX40L conditional mice had been further crossed with Great × Smart17A dual IFNγ and IL-17A reporters. Enumeration of the total CD4 T cell response confirmed a significant reduction in the intestinal CD4 T cell compartment in mice lacking OX40 (Fig. 8b)51, which was not detected in the conditional OX40L-deficient mice. Strikingly, the number of 2W1S-specific CD4 T cells, alongside the proportion and number of IFNγ+ (eYFP+), was specifically reduced in Rorccre × OX40Lf/f, but not in CD11ccre × OX40Lf/f mice (Fig. 8c–e), indicating that, for the effector Th1 cells in the colon, OX40L expression by ILC3s rather than by DCs was required. Furthermore, assessment of the response in the mLN (Fig. 8f) again revealed that the 2W1S Th1 response was specifically reduced in Rorccre × OX40Lf/f mice (Fig. 8g–i), suggesting that ILC3s might provide OX40L within the draining lymphoid tissue, either in addition or instead of provision within the colon. Regardless, the data clearly showed that, in the primary response to Salmonella-2W1S, the expression of OX40L by DCs was not required to sustain the effector Th1 response.
Collectively these data demonstrate a critical role for OX40L in supporting the effector Th1 response and that in vivo there are specific cellular providers of these signals dependent on the microenvironment and the response.
Discussion
Many cells are able to present Ag to T cells and potentially provide the costimulatory signals critical for optimal responses52. This suggests that CD4 T cells may interact with distinct Ag-presenting cell populations during the initial stages of the immune response as they move through different microenvironments within secondary lymphoid tissue29. However, despite its relevance for understanding how CD4 T cell responses are regulated, such a model has not been tested in vivo. Here we have provided a detailed in vivo dissection of the cellular provision of OX40L for Th1 effector CD4 T cells contrasting an acute systemic response with a chronic intestinal infection. Our data reveal that, in an acute Th1 infection model, OX40L provision by DCs is critical with OX40L expression by T cells, B cells or ILC3s redundant for the Th1 effector T cell response. In contrast, DC OX40L expression was not needed for the Th1 effector cells in response to oral Salmonella infection and here OX40L expression by ILC3s, or potentially T cells, was absolutely required. Thus, through conditionally deleting OX40L on different immune cell populations, our data reveal that, in vivo, there are specific cellular interactions that are critical for normal OX40L provision and this is tissue and response specific.
Having identified that DC expression of OX40L was required for generating a robust Th1 response, we were then able to dissect the pathway through which expression of OX40L by the DC was regulated, thereby identifying that NK cell:DC crosstalk ensures optimal OX40L expression through early IFNγ production signalling back to the DC. That this mechanism was also evident for regulating human DC expression of OX40L suggests this is a broadly relevant pathway controlling the expression of this costimulatory molecule. However, it is evident that other pro-inflammatory cytokines can also enhance DC expression of OX40L and in vitro culture with recombinant IL-18 or TNFα enhanced OX40L expression by DCs and both of these cytokines are required for optimal clearance of virulent Lm infection53,54. That DC expression of OX40L was critical in the response to Lm-2W1S likely reflects the very acute nature of this attenuated infection, resulting in only a short window of OX40 expression by activated T cells and thus presumably limited time for different cellular interactions providing OX40L signals. Where high levels of Ag are maintained for longer, such as in more chronic infections, T cell expression of OX40 is prolonged and here other cellular interactions after initial DC priming become relevant.
In the response to Salmonella-2W1S, deletion of OX40L using the Rorccre resulted in the loss of IFNγ-producing Th1 CD4 T cells in both the draining lymphoid tissue and the effector tissue (colon). While T cell provision of OX40L cannot be excluded, these data are consistent with ILC3 OX40L expression critical for intestinal T cell responses, significantly developing previous studies using immunodeficient mice50,55 where ILC frequencies are grossly perturbed31. The lack of a role for ILC3s in the splenic response to Lm-2W1S may reflect the acute response or simply perhaps the very low frequency of ILC3 in the spleen and the lack of clear clusters of ILC3, as seen in the intestine and their draining LNs30. Within the intestinal tract, it is evident that ILC3s restrict responses to commensal bacteria not only at the level of effector T cell responses56,57 but also through T follicular helper cells and IgA production58. Thus ILC3s promote some T cell responses, while limiting others, indicating a critical regulatory role in intestinal immunity, potentially presenting an attractive cellular target for therapeutic manipulation59. Exactly where ILC3s interact with activated T cells remains unanswered; however, the impaired 2W1S-specific response observed in both the mLN and colon suggests a role in the draining lymphoid tissue, and the interfollicular spaces of the mLN may be the critical microenvironment fostering such crosstalk31.
The 2W1S-specific CD4 T cell response to Lm-2W1S has been characterised in detail38 and contains both T-bet-dependent Th1 effector cells and Bcl-6-dependent follicular T cells in roughly equal proportions. How the individual cells within this polyclonal response are pushed down one differentiation pathway or another is poorly understood but at least partially reflects differences in the strength of TCR signalling60. Our data suggest that only about half the activated CD4 T cells responding to Lm-2W1S ever express OX40 and differentiate into Th1 effector cells through upregulation of Blimp-1 and T-bet, alongside repression of Bcl-635,61. Within the chronic Salmonella model, deletion of OX40L on ILC3 and T cells again resulted in a significant loss in the number Th1 effector cells; however, those cells that survived still expressed IFNγ. Thus signals through OX40 support Th1 effector cell expansion and survival rather than CD4 T cell differentiation9. The central finding of this manuscript is that, depending on the nature of the response, provision of OX40L signals is achieved through quite distinct interactions, with critical contributions by DCs and ILC3 demonstrated in vivo.
Collectively our data reveal that, despite the ability of many cell types to express costimulatory ligands for T cells, in vivo, there are specific cellular interactions that are needed for provision of these signals. Understanding these regulatory checkpoints and how costimulatory molecule expression is controlled in these situations will present further opportunities to better manipulate T cell responses for therapeutic benefit.
Methods
Mice
All mice used were C57BL/6 background and bred at Birmingham, except for IL-12p35−/− mice that were generated at the University of Manchester and shipped to Birmingham. Strains used were C57BL/6 (WT), CD11ccre, Cd1d1−/− (JAX stock 017294), E8111cre62, Great × Smart17A36, H2-Ab1f/f63, IL-12p35−/− (JAX stock #002692)64, IFNγ−/−, IFNγRf/f (JAX stock #025394)65, mT/mG (JAX stock #007576)66, OX40−/−, OX40−/− × CD30−/−13, OX40Lf/f39, PGKcre67 and Rorccre68. Animals were used in accordance with Home Office guidelines at the University of Birmingham. Mice were housed at 21 °C +/− 2 °C, 55% humidity (+/−10%) with 12-h light/dark cycle in 7–7 IVC caging with environmental enrichment of plastic houses plus paper bedding.
Lm-2W1S infection
Mice were infected with 107 actA-deficient Lm-expressing OVA-2W1S (Lm-2W1S, kind gift from Dr. M. Jenkins) through intravenous injection in the tail vein. Bacteria were pre-cultured in 10 ml of LB broth containing 20 μg/ml chloramphenicol from a single colony and grown overnight at 37 °C at 200–250 rpm. Next day, 1 ml of Lm-2W1S was seeded into 200 ml of LB broth containing 20 μg/ml chloramphenicol and grown at 37 °C at 200–250 rpm until OD600 of 0.6–0.7 was reached. The liquid bacterial cultures were then centrifuged for 20 min at 4 °C, 4000 rpm. The supernatant was discarded and pellets were resuspended in LB broth with 15% glycerol. Glycerol stocks of Lm-2W1S were aliquoted into 1 ml cryovials and stored at −80 °C. Three randomly chosen samples were used to assess the viability of bacterial stocks by plating serial dilution of bacteria on agar containing 20 μg/ml chloramphenicol. Prior administration, the 1 ml Lm-2W1S was centrifuged and washed with sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) before resuspending in adequate volume of sterile PBS to obtain 107 bacteria per 200 μl.
Salmonella-2W1S infection
The mice were given 20 mg of streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich) in 100 μl sterile PBS by oral gavage 24 h prior to the administration of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium BRD509 strain expressing the 2W1S epitope49 (Salmonella-2W1S, kind gift from Dr. S. McSorley). Bacteria were resuspended in adequate volume of sterile PBS to obtain 109 bacteria per 100 μl and administered by oral gavage.
Glycerol stocks were prepared using the same method as described in previous section. Streptomycin was used as a selection antibiotic. The viability of the stocks was tested by randomly choosing 3 samples and plating the bacteria on MacConkey agar (Sigma-Aldrich) containing 100 μg/ml of streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich).
In vivo Ab administration
The depletion of NK cells and CD8 T cells was achieved by intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of a dose of 250 μg anti-NK1.1 and 400 μg anti-CD8 in PBS at 48 h prior infection with 107 Lm-2W1S. Abs were provided by AstraZeneca.
Cell culture
Cell suspensions were prepared in sterile conditions.
Experiments to assess OX40L expression in conditional OX40L-deficient mice: Assessment of OX40L expression on Ag-presenting ells, like dendritic cells and B cells, required overnight culture with CD40 stimulation. For this purpose, purified anti-CD40 Ab was added at 1 μg/ml. To assess the expression of OX40L on T cells, 2 × 106 splenocytes were cultured at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 72 h in the presence of 10 μg/ml Abatacept and 0.5 μg/ml functional-grade anti-CD3ε.
Experiments to assess expression and regulation of OX40L on splenic DCs: In all, 2 × 106 splenocytes from uninfected or Lm-2W1S infected mice were cultured overnight (18–24 h) at 37 °C, 5% CO2 in 24-well plate in 1 ml culture media (RPMI/10% foetal bovine serum/L-Glu/penicillin and streptomycin), either alone or with 1 µg anti-CD40 Abs or 100 ng recombinant IFNγ (Peprotech).
Experiments to detect IFNγ production by NK cells: Splenocytes from mice infected with Lm-2W1S 24 h previously were cultured for 3 h in culture media in the presence of brefeldin A (10 µg/ml) and then analysed by flow cytometry.
Flow cytometry
Spleens were teased using fine forceps and digested for 25 min in RPMI containing with 250 µg/ml Collagenase-Dispase (Roche) and 25 µg/ml DNase I (Sigma). Digested tissue was then crushed through a nylon mesh, treated with Gey’s solution red blood lysis buffer and resuspended in appropriate volume of staining buffer. Splenocytes were re-filtered prior to use. Staining for 2W1S:I-Ab MHCII Tetramer and CXCR5 was performed for 1 h at room temperature (RT). Surface staining was performed at +4 °C for 30 min. Intracellular staining was done using the FoxP3 Fixation and Permeabilisation Kit (eBioscience) or Cytofix/Cytoperm Plus (BD Biosciences), both according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Abs raised against the following mouse agents were used: B220 (1:300 or 1:200; clone RA3-6B2, eBioscience), CCR6 (1:100; clone 29-2L17, eBioscience), CD3 (1:100 or 1:200; clone 145-2C11 or 17A2; eBioscience, BD Biosciences, or BioLegend), CD4 (1:200 or 1:300; clone RM4−5, BioLegend, eBioscience), CD8 (1:100 or 1:200; clone 53–6.7, eBioscience), CD11b (1:100 or 1:200; clone M1/70, eBioscience), CD11c (1:200 or 1:300; clone N418, eBioscience), CD25 (1:200; clone PC61, BioLegend), CD44 (1:200; clone IM7, eBioscience), CD49b (1:100; clone DX5, eBioscience), CD86 (1:100 or 1:600; clone GL-1, BioLegend), CXCR5 (1:50; clone 2G8, BD Biosciences), EOMES (1:50; clone Dan11mag, eBioscience), IFNγ (1:200 or 1:300; clone XMG1.2, eBioscience or BioLegend), IFNγR (1:100; clone 2E2, eBioscience), IL-7Rα (1:100; clone A7R34, BioLegend), Ly6c (1:800; clone HK1.4, BioLegend), MHCII (1:500; clone M5/114.15.2, eBioscience), NK1.1 (1:100; clone PK136, BD Biosciences or eBioscience), NKp46 (1:100; clone 29A1.4, BioLegend), OX40 (1:25; clone OX86, eBioscience), OX40L (1:50; clone RM134L, BioLegend), T-bet (1:50; clone 4B10, eBioscience), and TCRβ (1:100; clone H57–597, Biolegend). Addition of Spherotech Accucount blank particles was done to calculate cell frequencies. Flow cytometry was performed on a Fortessa analyser using the FACSDiva 8.0.2 software (BD), with data subsequently analysed with the FlowJo software version 10 (Tree Star).
Immunofluorescence detection of IFNγ expression in situ
Procedure has been performed as previously described69. Briefly, WT mice were infected with 104 colony-forming units LmOVA. Mice were given 250 μg brefeldin A by i.p. injection, 6 h before being sacrificed. After 24 h, mice were euthanised, and the spleens were removed, fixed in 4% PFA and cryopreserved in OCT. Serial sections (30 µm in thickness) of frozen spleens were stained overnight at +4 °C in a humidified chamber with the following Abs: anti-B220 PB (1:300; 103230, Biolegend), anti-CD169 Alexa647 (1:300; 142407, Biolegend), anti-CD8 BV510 (1:100; 100751, Biolegend), anti-IFNγ BV421 (1:200; 505829, Biolegend), anti-I-A/I-E biotin (1:200; 107603, Biolegend), or anti-NKp46 (1:200; AF2225, R&D). For secondary detection, sections were then washed and incubated with Streptavidin-Cy3 (1:200; 016-160-084, Jackson Immunoresearch) and anti-goat IgG A647 (1:500; ab150131; Abcam) for 3 h at RT. All sections were analysed by confocal microscopy. Quantification of the interaction between DCs and IFNγ-producing cells was performed manually. DCs were randomly selected in the IFNγ-rich area. For each DC, the number of IFNγ-producing CD8 T cells and the number of IFNγ-producing NK cells was recorded and averaged.
Human subjects
All analyses of human data were carried out in compliance with the relevant ethical regulations. Healthy blood donors gave informed consent at DRK Dresden, Germany, and buffy coats were obtained as approved by Charité ethics committee (EA4/059/17).
In vitro culture of human cDC2 and NK cells
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from buffy coats by density gradient centrifugation (Ficoll Paque Plus, GE Healthcare). CD56+ and CD19+ cells were depleted (CD56, CD19 microbeads and LD-columns, Miltenyi Biotec), the remaining cells were stained with biotinylated anti-CD1c Ab (1:50; 130-110-535, Miltenyi Biotec) and CD1c+ cells were enriched (anti-Biotin microbeads and LS-columns, Miltenyi Biotec). cDC2 were sorted from the CD1c-enriched fraction as viable CD14− CD1c+ cells (Supplementary Fig. 8a). Pure NK cells were sorted on a FACS Aria II (BD) from the CD56+/CD19+ fraction as viable CD14− CD19− CD3− CD56+ CD57− lymphocytes (shown in Supplementary Fig. 8b), using anti-CD14 (1:50; 301820, Biolegend), anti-CD19 (1:50; 302216, Biolegend), anti-CD3 (1:50, generated in house), anti-CD56 (1:200, 318306, Biolegend) and anti-CD57 (1:50, 393304, Biolegend) Abs. Autologous NK cells and cDC2 were mixed at a ratio of 2:1 and cultured in RPMI-1640 (Gibco) supplemented with 10% foetal calf serum at the indicated conditions for 40 h. Where indicated, recombinant IFNγ (Miltenyi Biotec) was added at a concentration of 100 ng/ml and IL-12 and IL-15 (both Miltenyi Biotec) at 50 ng/ml each. After 40 h, cells were stained and analysed on a FACS Aria II (BD) using these additional Abs: anti-HLA-DR (1:200; generated in house), anti-CD86 (1:50; 130-114-095, Miltenyi), anti-OX40L (1:100; 326308, Biolegend), anti-CD40 (1:50; 334336, Biolegend), and anti-CD3 (1:50; 47-0036-42, eBioscience).
RNA extraction of Lm-2W1S-stimulated DC and reverse transcriptase (RT) quantitative PCR
The DC [lin− (B220, CD3, NK1.1), CD11c+, MHCII+, Ly6c−] were sorted at 4 h post infection with Lm-2W1S. Total RNA was extracted from Buffer RLT with 1% β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich)-conserved DC using the RNeasy® Mini Kit (Qiagen), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA samples were stored at −80 °C until conversion into cDNA.
RNA was reverse-transcribed with SuperScriptTM III RT (InvitrogenTM ThermoFisher Scientific) using oligo-dT strategy and according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To synthesise cDNA, 1 μl of oligo (dT) primer, 1 μl of 10 mM stock of dNTPs (Invitrogen) and 11 μl of total RNA in Nuclease-free water were incubated at 65 °C for 5 min and then put on ice for 3 min. The following reagents were added: 4 μl of 5× First strand buffer (Invitrogen), 1 μl RNase OUT (Invitrogen), 1 μl of 0.1 M dithiothreitol (Invitrogen) and 1 μl of 200 units/μl Superscript III RT (Invitrogen) followed by incubation at 50 °C for 60 min. Reaction was inactivated for 15 min at 72 °C. To remove RNA complementary to the cDNA, 1 μl (2 units) of RNase H were added, and the reaction mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 20 min. cDNA samples were stored as multiple aliquots at −20 °C for subsequent use.
Quantitative real-time PCR
cDNA was amplified with the SensiFASTTM SYBR® Hi-Rox Kit (Bioline Meridian Bioscience), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Amplification reactions and detections were performed on ABI PRISM 7900HT Sequence Detection System (Applied BiosystemsTM ThermoFisher Scientific): 50 °C 2 min, 95 °C 10 min, [95 °C 15 s; 60 °C 1 min] × 40.
Primers used were Il12a p35 (Mm_Il12a_1_SG Qiagen QT01048334) and Il12b p40 (Mm_Il12b_1_SG Qiagen QT00153643). Each sample was run in triplicates, and the levels of the mRNA detected were normalised to β-actin. Data were analysed by calculating the relative expression of the target to β-actin in each sample = 2ΔCt (with ΔCt = Ctβ-actin − Cttarget).
Statistical analysis
Data were analysed using GraphPad Prism (version 8). Non-parametric Mann–Whitney, two tailed or non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc Dunn’s tests or, following the successful normality tests, ordinary one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s tests were used to determine significance, which was set at p ≤ 0.05. Median values were calculated and used in all analyses unless stated.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
The following tetramer was obtained through the NIH Tetramer Facility: 2W1S:I-Ab. We thank Dr. M. Jenkins (Lm-2W1S) and Dr. S. McSorley (Salmonella-2W1S) for provision of bacterial strains. We thank the following for their kind provision of mice: Dr. Adam Cunningham (Ifnγ−/− mice), Dr. Daniela Finke (H2-Ab1f/f mice), Dr. Dan Littman (Rorccre mice), Dr. Nick Jones (CD1d−/− mice), Dr. Richard Locksley (Great × Smart17A mice), Dr. Michael Reth (Mb1cre), and Dr. Alfred Singer (E8111cre mice). We thank Dr. Gianluca Carlesso and AstraZeneca for their kind provision of anti-NK1.1 and anti-CD8 Abs for in vivo depletion experiments. This work was supported by a Senior Research Fellowship from the Wellcome Trust to DRW (Grant Number 110199/Z/15/Z).
Source data
Author contributions
D.W.G. designed and performed experiments and wrote the manuscript; F.G., E.E.H., R.F., E.E.D., C.W. and S.L.B. performed and assisted with experiments; T.R., C.R. and A.G. designed, performed and analysed experiments; A.S.M. provided IL-12p35−/− mice, critiqued data and helped design experiments; M.B. and T.V. generated and provided OX40Lf/f mice and critiqued data; D.R.W. designed experiments, critiqued data and wrote the manuscript.
Data availability
All data are available on request. Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Guido Ferlazzo and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41467-020-17293-3.
References
- 1.Ward-Kavanagh LK, Lin WW, Sedy JR, Ware CF. The TNF receptor superfamily in co-stimulating and co-inhibitory responses. Immunity. 2016;44:1005–1019. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.04.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Watts TH. TNF/TNFR family members in costimulation of T cell responses. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2005;23:23–68. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Croft M. Co-stimulatory members of the TNFR family: keys to effective T-cell immunity? Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2003;3:609–620. doi: 10.1038/nri1148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Croft M. The role of TNF superfamily members in T-cell function and diseases. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2009;9:271–285. doi: 10.1038/nri2526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Croft M. Control of immunity by the TNFR-related molecule OX40 (CD134) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2010;28:57–78. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-030409-101243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dawicki W, Bertram EM, Sharpe AH, Watts TH. 4-1BB and OX40 act independently to facilitate robust CD8 and CD4 recall responses. J. Immunol. 2004;173:5944–5951. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.10.5944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gramaglia I, et al. The OX40 costimulatory receptor determines the development of CD4 memory by regulating primary clonal expansion. J. Immunol. 2000;165:3043–3050. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.6.3043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Soroosh P, Ine S, Sugamura K, Ishii N. Differential requirements for OX40 signals on generation of effector and central memory CD4+ T cells. J. Immunol. 2007;179:5014–5023. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.8.5014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rogers PR, Song J, Gramaglia I, Killeen N, Croft M. OX40 promotes Bcl-xL and Bcl-2 expression and is essential for long- term survival of CD4 T cells. Immunity. 2001;15:445–455. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(01)00191-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Byun M, et al. Inherited human OX40 deficiency underlying classic Kaposi sarcoma of childhood. J. Exp. Med. 2013;210:1743–1759. doi: 10.1084/jem.20130592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gaspal F, et al. Critical synergy of CD30 and OX40 signals in CD4 T cell homeostasis and Th1 immunity to Salmonella. J. Immunol. 2008;180:2824–2829. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.5.2824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gaspal F, et al. Abrogation of CD30 and OX40 signals prevents autoimmune disease in FoxP3-deficient mice. J. Exp. Med. 2011;208:1579–1584. doi: 10.1084/jem.20101484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gaspal FM, et al. Mice deficient in OX40 and CD30 signals lack memory antibody responses because of deficient CD4 T cell memory. J. Immunol. 2005;174:3891–3896. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.7.3891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Linton PJ, et al. Costimulation via OX40L expressed by B cells is sufficient to determine the extent of primary CD4 cell expansion and Th2 cytokine secretion in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 2003;197:875–883. doi: 10.1084/jem.20021290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Arestides RS, et al. Costimulatory molecule OX40L is critical for both Th1 and Th2 responses in allergic inflammation. Eur. J. Immunol. 2002;32:2874–2880. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(2002010)32:10<2874::AID-IMMU2874>3.0.CO;2-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jenkins SJ, Perona-Wright G, Worsley AG, Ishii N, MacDonald AS. Dendritic cell expression of OX40 ligand acts as a costimulatory, not polarizing, signal for optimal Th2 priming and memory induction in vivo. J. Immunol. 2007;179:3515–3523. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.6.3515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kopf M, et al. OX40−deficient mice are defective in Th cell proliferation but are competent in generating B cell and CTL responses after virus infection. Immunity. 1999;11:699–708. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80144-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ito T, et al. TSLP-activated dendritic cells induce an inflammatory T helper type 2 cell response through OX40 ligand. J. Exp. Med. 2005;202:1213–1223. doi: 10.1084/jem.20051135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Xiao X, et al. The costimulatory receptor OX40 inhibits interleukin-17 expression through activation of repressive chromatin remodeling pathways. Immunity. 2016;44:1271–1283. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.05.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Stüber E, Neurath M, Calderhead D, Fell HP, Strober W. Cross-linking of OX40 ligand, a member of the TNF/NGF cytokine family, induces proliferation and differentiation in murine splenic B cells. Immunity. 1995;2:507–521. doi: 10.1016/1074-7613(95)90031-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ohshima Y, et al. Expression and function of OX40 ligand on human dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 1997;159:3838–3848. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Takasawa N, et al. Expression of gp34 (OX40 ligand) and OX40 on human T cell clones. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 2001;92:377–382. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2001.tb01105.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kim MY, et al. CD4(+)CD3(−) accessory cells costimulate primed CD4 T cells through OX40 and CD30 at sites where T cells collaborate with B cells. Immunity. 2003;18:643–654. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(03)00110-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Imura A, et al. The human OX40/gp34 system directly mediates adhesion of activated T cells to vascular endothelial cells. J. Exp. Med. 1996;183:2185–2191. doi: 10.1084/jem.183.5.2185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Burgess JK, et al. Detection and characterization of OX40 ligand expression in human airway smooth muscle cells: a possible role in asthma? J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2004;113:683–689. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2003.12.311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mempel TR, Henrickson SE, Von Andrian UH. T-cell priming by dendritic cells in lymph nodes occurs in three distinct phases. Nature. 2004;427:154–159. doi: 10.1038/nature02238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Stoll S, Delon J, Brotz TM, Germain RN. Dynamic imaging of T cell-dendritic cell interactions in lymph nodes. Science. 2002;296:1873–1876. doi: 10.1126/science.1071065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bousso P, Robey E. Dynamics of CD8+ T cell priming by dendritic cells in intact lymph nodes. Nat. Immunol. 2003;4:579–585. doi: 10.1038/ni928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kerfoot SM, et al. Germinal center B cell and T follicular helper cell development initiates in the interfollicular zone. Immunity. 2011;34:947–960. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.03.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Withers DR, et al. Cutting edge: lymphoid tissue inducer cells maintain memory CD4 T cells within secondary lymphoid tissue. J. Immunol. 2012;189:2094–2098. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mackley EC, et al. CCR7-dependent trafficking of RORgamma(+) ILCs creates a unique microenvironment within mucosal draining lymph nodes. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:5862. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kim M-Y, et al. OX40-ligand and CD30-ligand are expressed on adult but not neonatal CD4+CD3- inducer cells: evidence that IL7 signals regulate CD30-ligand but not OX40-ligand expression. J. Immunol. 2005;174:6686–6691. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.11.6686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.von Burg N, et al. Activated group 3 innate lymphoid cells promote T-cell-mediated immune responses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:12835–12840. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1406908111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Marriott CL, et al. OX40 controls effector CD4+ T-cell expansion, not follicular T helper cell generation in acute Listeria infection. Eur. J. Immunol. 2014;44:2437–2447. doi: 10.1002/eji.201344211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Boettler T, et al. Exogenous OX40 stimulation during lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection impairs follicular Th cell differentiation and diverts CD4 T cells into the effector lineage by upregulating Blimp-1. J. Immunol. 2013 doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Price AE, Reinhardt RL, Liang HE, Locksley RM. Marking and quantifying IL-17A-producing cells in vivo. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e39750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Pepper M, et al. Different routes of bacterial infection induce long-lived TH1 memory cells and short-lived TH17 cells. Nat. Immunol. 2010;11:83–89. doi: 10.1038/ni.1826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Pepper M, Pagan AJ, Igyarto BZ, Taylor JJ, Jenkins MK. Opposing signals from the Bcl6 transcription factor and the interleukin-2 receptor generate T helper 1 central and effector memory cells. Immunity. 2011;35:583–595. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.09.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Cortini A, et al. B cell OX40L supports T follicular helper cell development and contributes to SLE pathogenesis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017;76:2095–2103. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Scharton TM, Scott P. Natural killer cells are a source of interferon gamma that drives differentiation of CD4+ T cell subsets and induces early resistance to Leishmania major in mice. J. Exp. Med. 1993;178:567–577. doi: 10.1084/jem.178.2.567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Takeda K, et al. Defective NK cell activity and Th1 response in IL-18-deficient mice. Immunity. 1998;8:383–390. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80543-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Manetti R, et al. Natural killer cell stimulatory factor (interleukin 12 [IL-12]) induces T helper type 1 (Th1)-specific immune responses and inhibits the development of IL-4-producing Th cells. J. Exp. Med. 1993;177:1199–1204. doi: 10.1084/jem.177.4.1199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Coccia M, et al. Cellular and molecular synergy in AS01-adjuvanted vaccines results in an early IFNgamma response promoting vaccine immunogenicity. NPJ Vaccines. 2017;2:25. doi: 10.1038/s41541-017-0027-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gerosa F, et al. Reciprocal activating interaction between natural killer cells and dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 2002;195:327–333. doi: 10.1084/jem.20010938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hsieh CS, et al. Development of TH1 CD4+ T cells through IL-12 produced by Listeria-induced macrophages. Science. 1993;260:547–549. doi: 10.1126/science.8097338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Humann J, Lenz LL. Activation of naive NK cells in response to Listeria monocytogenes requires IL-18 and contact with infected dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 2010;184:5172–5178. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0903759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Tripp CS, Gately MK, Hakimi J, Ling P, Unanue ER. Neutralization of IL-12 decreases resistance to Listeria in SCID and C.B-17 mice. Reversal by IFN-gamma. J. Immunol. 1994;152:1883–1887. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Carnaud C, et al. Cutting edge: cross-talk between cells of the innate immune system: NKT cells rapidly activate NK cells. J. Immunol. 1999;163:4647–4650. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mooney JP, et al. Transient loss of protection afforded by a live attenuated non-typhoidal Salmonella vaccine in mice co-infected with malaria. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015;9:e0004027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Castellanos JG, et al. Microbiota-induced TNF-like ligand 1A drives group 3 innate lymphoid cell-mediated barrier protection and intestinal T cell activation during colitis. Immunity. 2018;49:1077–1089 e1075. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.10.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Withers DR, et al. The survival of memory CD4+ T cells within the gut lamina propria requires OX40 and CD30 signals. J. Immunol. 2009;183:5079–5084. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kambayashi T, Laufer TM. Atypical MHC class II-expressing antigen-presenting cells: can anything replace a dendritic cell? Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2014;14:719–730. doi: 10.1038/nri3754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Neighbors M, et al. A critical role for interleukin 18 in primary and memory effector responses to Listeria monocytogenes that extends beyond its effects on Interferon gamma production. J. Exp. Med. 2001;194:343–354. doi: 10.1084/jem.194.3.343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Shibuya K, et al. IL-1 alpha and TNF-alpha are required for IL-12-induced development of Th1 cells producing high levels of IFN-gamma in BALB/c but not C57BL/6 mice. J. Immunol. 1998;160:1708–1716. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Deng T, et al. ILC3-derived OX40L is essential for homeostasis of intestinal Tregs in immunodeficient mice. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2019 doi: 10.1038/s41423-019-0200-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hepworth MR, et al. Immune tolerance. Group 3 innate lymphoid cells mediate intestinal selection of commensal bacteria-specific CD4(+) T cells. Science. 2015;348:1031–1035. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa4812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hepworth MR, et al. Innate lymphoid cells regulate CD4+ T-cell responses to intestinal commensal bacteria. Nature. 2013;498:113–117. doi: 10.1038/nature12240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Melo-Gonzalez F, Hepworth MR. Functional and phenotypic heterogeneity of group 3 innate lymphoid cells. Immunology. 2017;150:265–275. doi: 10.1111/imm.12697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Withers DR. Innate lymphoid cell regulation of adaptive immunity. Immunology. 2016;149:123–130. doi: 10.1111/imm.12639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Tubo NJ, et al. Single naive CD4+ T cells from a diverse repertoire produce different effector cell types during infection. Cell. 2013;153:785–796. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Johnston RJ, et al. Bcl6 and Blimp-1 are reciprocal and antagonistic regulators of T follicular helper cell differentiation. Science. 2009;325:1006–1010. doi: 10.1126/science.1175870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.McCaughtry TM, et al. Conditional deletion of cytokine receptor chains reveals that IL-7 and IL-15 specify CD8 cytotoxic lineage fate in the thymus. J. Exp. Med. 2012;209:2263–2276. doi: 10.1084/jem.20121505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Hashimoto K, Joshi SK, Koni PA. A conditional null allele of the major histocompatibility IA-beta chain gene. Genesis. 2002;32:152–153. doi: 10.1002/gene.10056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Mattner F, et al. Genetically resistant mice lacking interleukin-12 are susceptible to infection with Leishmania major and mount a polarized Th2 cell response. Eur. J. Immunol. 1996;26:1553–1559. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830260722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Lee SH, et al. Identifying the initiating events of anti-Listeria responses using mice with conditional loss of IFN-gamma receptor subunit 1 (IFNGR1) J. Immunol. 2013;191:4223–4234. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Muzumdar MD, Tasic B, Miyamichi K, Li L, Luo L. A global double-fluorescent Cre reporter mouse. Genesis. 2007;45:593–605. doi: 10.1002/dvg.20335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Lallemand Y, Luria V, Haffner-Krausz R, Lonai P. Maternally expressed PGK-Cre transgene as a tool for early and uniform activation of the Cre site-specific recombinase. Transgenic Res. 1998;7:105–112. doi: 10.1023/a:1008868325009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Eberl G, Littman DR. Thymic origin of intestinal alphabeta T cells revealed by fate mapping of RORgammat+ cells. Science. 2004;305:248–251. doi: 10.1126/science.1096472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Mazet JM, Chiodetti AL, Mahale JN, Gerard A. Imaging of in situ interferon gamma production in the mouse spleen following Listeria monocytogenes infection. J. Vis. Exp. 2019 doi: 10.3791/59819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data are available on request. Source data are provided with this paper.