Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2020 Jul 10;10:11619. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68767-9

Author Correction: Image Quality and Radiation Dose for Prospectively Triggered Coronary CT Angiography: 128-Slice Single-Source CT versus First-Generation 64-Slice Dual-Source CT

Jin Gu 1, He-shui Shi 1, Ping Han 1,, Jie Yu 1, Gui-na Ma 1, Sheng Wu 1
PMCID: PMC7351788  PMID: 32651441

Correction to: Scientific Reports 10.1038/srep34795, published online 18 October 2016

This Article contains a typographical error in the Discussion section.

“Another factor is the relatively lower time resolution of 128-MSCT compared with DSCT (83 ms VS 150 ms).”

should read:

“Another factor is the relatively lower time resolution of 128-MSCT compared with DSCT (150 ms VS 83 ms).”


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES