Abstract
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease that affects millions of people worldwide and increases the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) development. We have previously shown that American ginseng (AG) can treat colitis and prevent colon cancer in mice. We further fractionated AG and identified the most potent fraction, hexane fraction (HAG), and the most potent compound in this fraction, panaxynol (PA). Because (1) oxidative stress plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of colitis and associated CRC and (2) nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) is the master regulator of antioxidant responses, we examined the role of Nrf2 as a mechanism by which AG suppresses colitis. Through a series of in vitro and in vivo Nrf2 knockout mouse experiments, we found that AG and its components activate the Nrf2 pathway and decrease the oxidative stress in macrophages (mΦ) and colon epithelial cells in vitro. Consistent with these in vitro results, the Nrf2 pathway is activated by AG and its components in vivo, and Nrf2-/- mice are resistant to the suppressive effects of AG, HAG and PA on colitis. Results from this study establish Nrf2 as a mediator of AG and its components in the treatment of colitis.
Keywords: ulcerative, colitis, mice, Nrf2, NFE2L2, panaxynol, falcarinol, inflammatory, inflammation, ginseng
1. Introduction
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD), debilitates approximately 2.6 million people in North America, and this number is on the rise [1]. In particular, the relative risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) in patients with UC is tenfold greater than the general population [2]. The etiology of UC remains to be fully elucidated but involves interactions among genetic, environmental, and immune factors, leading to uncontrolled abnormal immune responses in the intestinal mucosa [3]. Chronic intestinal inflammation is associated with enhanced reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and the consequent oxidative stress plays a critical role in the pathophysiology of IBD in both animals and humans [4,5,6]. Prevention of IBD has been shown by transgenic overexpression of endogenous antioxidant genes and administration of antioxidant compounds [7,8,9,10]. Treatment strategies for UC (and the prevention of CRC) reduce periods of active disease and maintain remission, but patients become refractory, and there are dangerous side effects like cancer, infection, sepsis, hepatitis, and death [11,12,13,14]. For that reason, 40%–50% of IBD patients use some form of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) [15,16]. Identifying new treatments that have minimal toxicity to treat the disease and prevent colon cancer, therefore, remains a high priority.
Through many years of experimentation, we have demonstrated that American ginseng (AG) suppresses colitis in mice without toxicity [17,18,19]. In further delineating the active components of AG, a fraction of AG was derived from extraction with n-hexane as the solvent (and therefore designated as the hexane fraction of American ginseng [HAG]), which was particularly potent in suppressing colitis and preventing CRC in mice [20,21,22]. We have also observed that panaxynol (PA), an abundant molecule in this fraction, suppresses colitis in mice. The next logical step was to explore the molecular mechanisms of the beneficial effects of AG and its components on the treatment of UC.
Nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), a master regulator of the antioxidant response element, is a member of the cap’n collar family of basic region-leucine zipper transcription factor [23]. As a transcription factor, Nrf2 promotes the expression of phase II antioxidant enzymes that include, but is not limited to, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (phosphate) hydrogen (NAD[P]H) quinone oxidoreductase-1 (NQO1) and heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), which protect against ROS. The precise mechanisms of Nrf2 activation are not fully understood, but it is widely accepted that Keap1 is a key regulator of Nrf2. Knowing that (1) Nrf2 is a key initiator of antioxidant response required for the treatment of UC [7,8,9,10]; (2) AG suppresses colitis [17,18,19,20,21,22]; and (3) ginseng and its components (including PA) can induce Nrf2 [24,25,26,27], we hypothesized that Nrf2 is at the crossroads of the protective action of AG, HAG, and PA against colitis. Here we show results that are consistent with this hypothesis.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Cell Culture
All cell lines were maintained in cell culture media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% penicillin, and were kept at 37 °C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2;. ANA-1 cells were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Hyclone, Logan, UT), and HCT-116 cells were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI)-1640 media. For the activation of ANA-1 cells, the cells were plated in 100 mm dishes, allowed to attach overnight, and were treated with 10 ng/mL interferon (IFN)-γ in 2 mL media (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) for 12 h. For co-culture experiments, 1 × 106 HCT-116 cells were plated and allowed to attach overnight in 6-well dishes. Then, they were pretreated with AG (100 µg/mL), HAG (100 µg/mL), or PA (0.25 µg/mL) for 8 h. Activated ANA-1 cells were then plated at 3 × 106 cells/well in transwell inserts (cat. # 2018-11, Greiner bio-one; Kremsmünster, Austria), which were then placed in the 6-well dishes to facilitate the exchange of cytokines and other cellular secretions. The 6-well dishes have a growth area of 9.5 cm2, and the transwell inserts have a growth area of 4.524 cm2.
2.2. ROS Detection
ANA-1 mΦ were pre-treated with AG (100 µg/mL), HAG (100 µg/mL), or PA (0.25 µg/mL) for 12 h in 6-well dishes. The media was replaced with media containing IFN-γ (10 ng/mL), the cells were treated for 1, 2, or 3 h, and were then processed according to the instructions of the Superoxide/Total Oxidant Species Chemiluminescent kit (lot # 101214A; Applied Bioanalytical labs). Briefly, the cells were washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and resuspended in Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS). Luminol and enhancer solutions were added before measuring the luminescence in a luminometer at 425 nm. Luminometer quantifies an oxidative burst through the reaction of luminol with ROS to produce a luminophore. Luminescence intensity is proportional to the number of reactive species in the sample and is quantified as relative light units.
2.3. Western Blot
For the gel electrophoresis, proteins were mixed with Novex Tris-Glycine SDS Sample buffer (LC2676; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for a final concentration of 2 µg/µL. Enough mixture of protein and sample buffer was obtained to ensure 30 µg of protein were loaded in Novex WedgeWell 4%–20% Tris-Glycine Mini Gels, 15-well (XP04205BOX; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The primary antibodies, HO-1 (ab13248; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and GAPDH (5174S; Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), were diluted to 1:1000 and incubated with the membrane overnight at 4 °C. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (7074S; Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA) at 1:2000 dilution were incubated at room temperature for 1 h. The Western blot signal was detected by Pierce ECL Western Blotting Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and imaged using Bio-Rad ChemiDoc Imager (17001402; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).
2.4. Immunofluorescence
Cells (5 × 105 per well) were seeded into six well plates containing a coverslip. The next day, cells were rinsed with ice-cold PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature, followed by permeabilization with 0.1% sodium citrate with 0.1% Triton X-100. The cells were incubated with Nrf2 antibody at 1:1000 dilution (12721S; Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. The cells were then washed with cold PBS three times (5 min each) and incubated with Alexa 514-labeled anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:1000) (A11061; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at room temperature for 1 h. The cells were then incubated with conjugated actin antibodies for 15 min. After washing with PBS, the coverslips were mounted onto the slides with ProLong Diamond Antifade Mountant with DAPI (P36962; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Standard immunofluorescence methods were used as described previously [28]. Imaging was performed using EvosFL fluorescence microscope (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) at 40× objective magnification. Fluorescence intensities from images of six randomly selected microscopic fields of cells were semi-quantitatively analyzed by densitometry (ImageJ software, NIH).
2.5. Immunohistochemistry
For immunohistochemical staining, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded serial sections of mouse colon tissues were incubated overnight at 4 °C with the following primary antibodies: anti-HO-1 (ab13248; Rabbit Polyclonal, diluted 1:2000; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), 4-Hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) (ab46545; Rabbit Polyclonal, diluted 1:1000; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), or cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) (Rabbit Polyclonal, diluted 1:1000; 60126; Cayman Chemical Company, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). To ensure even staining and reproducibility, sections were incubated by slow rocking using the Antibody Amplifier (AA1; ProHisto, LLC, Columbia, SC, USA). Sections were processed with EnVision+ System-HRP kit according to the kit protocols (K4011; Dako Cytomation, Carpinteria, CA, USA). The chromogen was diaminobenzidine, and sections were counterstained with 2% methyl green. The negative control was carried out in the absence of a primary antibody. Intensity and degree of specific staining were evaluated independently by two blinded investigators. Immunohistochemistry score was quantified as described previously [22].
2.6. RNA Isolation and RT-qPCR
Cells were lysed using Trizol, and RNA was isolated using the RNeasy mini kit (#74104; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the instructions. RNA concentrations were measured using NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). One microgram of RNA was used for cDNA synthesis using iScript cDNA synthesis kit (#1708890; Bio-rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The final product was diluted 1:10 for qPCR. qPCR was performed using iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (1725121; Bio-rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Fifty nanograms of cDNA were used with 500 nM of each primer. qPCR was carried out on CFX384 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (1855485; Bio-rad, Hercules, CA, USA). DNA polymerase activation and denaturation were done for 30 s at 95 °C, 40 cycles of denaturation for 5 s each at 95 °C, and annealing was done for 30 s at 60 °C. Primer design and selection was done using Primer-BLAST tool provided by the NIH. The list of primers used is as follows in the order of forward then reverse in 5′-3′ orientation:
2.6.1. Mouse Primers
HO-1: AAGCCGAGAATGCTGAGTTCA, GCCGTGTAGATATGGTACAAGGA
Nrf2: TCTTGGAGTAAGTCGAGAAGTGT, GTTGAAACTGAGCGAAAAAGGC
GAPDH: AGGTCGGTGTGAACGGATTTG, TGTAGACCATGTAGTTGAGGTCA
2.6.2. Human Primers
HO-1: CCACCTGTTAATGACCTTGCC, CACCGGACAAAGTTCATGGC
Nrf2: TCAGCGACGGAAAGAGTATGA, CCACTGGTTTCTGACTGGATGT
GAPDH: AATCCCATCACCATCTTCCA, TGGACTCCACGACGTACTCA
2.7. Dextran Sulfate Sodium (DSS) Mouse Model
All animal experimental protocols were performed in accordance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of South Carolina under an approved protocol (2375-101235-081417). We followed our previously described protocol for the DSS (MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH: 36,000–50,000 mw) mouse model of colitis [21,22]. Briefly, 8- to 10-week-old C57BL/6 wild-type (WT) and C57BL/6 Nrf2−/− (Nrf2−/−) (The Jackson Laboratory, B6.129X1-Nfe2l2tm1Ywk/J) mice received either water ad libitum or 2% DSS for two weeks. All mice were on an AIN93 M diet. During days 7–14, vehicle (PBS), AG (75 mg/kg/day), HAG (75 mg/kg/day), or PA (1 mg/kg/day) was dissolved in 100 μL of PBS and administered daily by oral gavage (per os, PO). The concentrations for AG and HAG were chosen to contain the same amount of PA given in this experiment. On the day of the sacrifice, stool consistency (0—fully formed stool; 2—loose stool; 4—diarrhea) and blood in the stool (0—no blood; 2—detected using Hemoccult; 4—rectal bleeding) were scored, and these measurements were used along with the weight difference in mice from the beginning to the end of the experiment (0 = no weight loss; 1 = 0%–5% weight loss; 2 = 6%–10% weight loss; 3 = 11%–15% weight loss; 4 = 16%–20% weight loss) to calculate the clinical disease index (CDI). Blood in the stool was detected using Beckman Coulter Hemoccult Fecal Occult Blood Slide Test System (SK-60151; Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) fecal immunochemical test. Mice were sacrificed on day 14, 24 h after the last treatment; colons were fixed overnight in formalin after they were cut longitudinally, and their lengths were measured. The colons were then embedded in paraffin for sectioning.
2.8. Quantifying Inflammation
Paraffin-embedded colons were serially sectioned (5 µm), and one section from each mouse was stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). The H&E-stained slides were blindly examined under a microscope by two independent investigators for histopathological changes and scored according to the system previously described [22,28,29]. The histology score for inflammation accounts for four parameters: (1) inflammation severity (0 = no inflammation, 1 = minimal, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe); (2) inflammation extent (0 = no inflammation, 1 = mucosa only, 2 = mucosa and submucosa, and 3 = transmural); (3) crypt damage (0 = no crypt damage, 1 = one-third of crypt damaged, 2 = two-thirds damaged, 3 = crypts lost and surface epithelium intact, and 4 = crypts lost and surface epithelium lost); and (4) percentage area of involvement (0 = 0% involvement, 1 = 1%–25%, 2 = 26%–50%, 3 = 51%–75%, and 4 = 76%–100%). The scores for the first three parameters were added, and the sum was multiplied by the fourth parameter, giving a range of scores between 0–40.
2.9. Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as a mean ± standard error of the mean. Mean differences between the groups were compared by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests. A p-value of ≤0.05 was chosen for significance.
3. Results
3.1. American Ginseng and Its Derivatives Suppress Oxidative Stress and Activate Nrf2 Pathway in Macrophages
We have previously shown that AG suppresses ROS in vitro [18,19]. Consistent with and advancing those findings, we show here that ANA-1 cells pre-treated with AG, HAG, and PA produced significantly decreased amounts of the total ROS associated with IFN-γ activation (Figure 1A). Given that Nrf2 is important in response to inflammation, we looked at the translocation of Nrf2 into the nucleus, as well as activation of a key target gene activated by this transcription factor using AG, HAG, or PA. Immunofluorescence data shows that Nrf2 was localized to the nucleus upon treatment with AG, HAG, or PA, indicating its activation (Figure 1B). HO-1, a target of Nrf2, was also upregulated by AG, HAG, and PA treatment of ANA-1 mΦ, as shown by Western blot and RT-qPCR (Figure 1C,D). Furthermore, AG, HAG, and PA treatments elevated the expression of the Nrf2 gene (Figure 1E). To check the activation of Nrf2 in epithelial cells in an inflammatory environment, we co-cultured HCT-116 cells with activated ANA-1 cells for 3 h after pretreating the HCT-116 cells for 8 h with AG, HAG, or PA. RT-qPCR data indicates that both Nrf2 and HO-1 were overexpressed when HCT-116 cells were pre-treated with AG, HAG, or PA, even in the presence of proinflammatory ANA-1 mΦ (Figure 1F,G).
3.2. American Ginseng and Its Derivatives Suppress Oxidative Stress and Activate Nrf2 Pathway In Vivo
To evaluate if Nrf2 is activated by the AG, HAG, and/or PA in vivo, the colons of mice treated with DSS or DSS combined with AG, HAG, or PA were probed for 4-HNE and HO-1. Since 4-HNE is known to activate Nrf2 [29] and is also a marker of inflammation, we probed for this endpoint. Figure 2A shows induced expression of 4-HNE in the DSS-treated group and its suppression when mice also consumed AG, HAG or PA. We have previously shown that AG and HAG suppress colitis in mice [18,19,21,22,30]. Consistent with our previous findings, AG, HAG, and now PA suppress colitis in DSS-treated mice (Figure 2A). Figure 2B shows induction of HO-1 in colitis (consistent with previous findings [31,32]) and further induction with administration of AG, HAG, or PA.
3.3. American Ginseng and Its Derivatives Suppress Colitis by Activating Nrf2 Pathway
With evidence indicating Nrf2 as a mediator of suppression of colitis by AG, HAG, and PA, we tested the hypothesis that these ingredients would suppress colitis in WT but not in Nrf2−/− mice exposed to DSS (Figure 3). As expected, AG, HAG, and PA suppressed DSS-induced colitis in WT but not Nrf2−/− mice (Figure 3C and Figure 4A,B). We also tested immunoreactivity of COX2, a proinflammatory enzyme that has elevated protein expression during inflammation. Again, AG, HAG, and PA each effectively decrease COX2 expression in WT mice but not the Nrf2−/− mice (Figure 4C,D).
4. Discussion
IBD, by definition, is described as a complex chronic colon inflammation condition. Therefore, there is no surprise that antioxidant-based approaches have shown efficacy in treating IBD [33]. Current FDA-approved therapies involve treatment with 5-aminosalicylic acid and its analogs, as well as glucocorticosteroids and anti-TNFα biologicals. Such treatment reduces periods of active disease and helps to maintain remission. Although these drugs have modest beneficial effects, patients become refractory, and there are significant side effects [34]. This underscores the importance of developing more effective IBD therapies. To this end, we have explored the potency of AG, a natural compound, in the treatment of colitis and identified the bioactive components that could be responsible for AG’s efficacy. The identification of a single, active component would bring AG a step closer to being used as a mainstream medicine. In this context, it makes sense and would be significant to explore the molecular mechanisms of AG-mediated beneficial effects on the treatment of IBD.
In this study, we evaluated the antioxidant response and activation of the Nrf2 signaling pathway in macrophage cell lines (in vitro) and mouse colon (in vivo) upon treatment with AG or its components. Treatment with either AG, HAG, or PA has activated HO-1 in both ANA-1 macrophage cell lines and mouse colons in the DSS-induced colitis model. They also induced the translocation of Nrf2 into the nucleus, indicating its activation. Furthermore, we observed that each of these treatment compounds also caused suppression of both ROS production in vitro and the expression of 4-HNE in vivo. Taken together, such an inhibition indicates decreased oxidative stress. Upon confirming that AG and its components activate the Nrf2 pathway, we used Nrf2−/− mice to investigate if the Nrf2 pathway is essential for the treatment of colitis. As predicted, AG and its components were not very effective in the Nrf2−/− mice as evidenced by the inflammation scores and expression of COX2.
Though the effects of AG and its components have been diminished considerably, there is still a decrease in inflammation with AG treatment of Nrf2−/− mice. This could be due to the effect of p53, which also plays an important role in the activation of antioxidant mechanisms like the synthesis of GSH and NADPH generation [35,36]. We have previously shown that the mechanism of action of AG in the treatment of colitis is p53 dependent, but the mechanism of HAG is only partially dependent on p53 [19,21]. Apart from possessing antioxidant properties, Nrf2 has also been shown to negatively regulate the expression of pro-inflammatory genes that are induced in M1 pro-inflammatory mΦ [37]. This is consistent with the decreased expression of ROS, the proinflammatory markers, and could be an additional mechanism by which Nrf2 activation helps in the treatment of colitis that we would explore in the future (Figure 5).
Because Nrf2 is involved in colitis and associated with colon cancer, we believe it would be significant to examine the ability of AG, HAG, and PA to target Nrf2 as a mechanism for the protection of colitis and colon cancer [38,39,40]. Such studies will not only better elucidate the mechanisms by which AG, HAG, and PA work in this disease, but also (1) identify other diseases where Nrf2 is dysregulated and AG, HAG, and individual constituents may be beneficial, such as obesity, neurodegenerative diseases, and cardiovascular disease [41,42,43]; (2) identify other CAMs or small molecules that target Nrf2 that may be beneficial to patients with colitis at a high colon cancer risk, such as triterpenoids that target Nrf2 and also suppress experimental colitis [44,45]; and (3) identify epigenetic biomarkers of Nrf2 regulation and attenuation of inflammation.
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Anne Hofseth for help with immunohistochemistry experiments for Figure 2 and Figure 4. Thanks to Tia Davis at the USC Animal Research Facility for the technical assistance in blood collection. Thanks to Meredith Tashkandi for grammar review.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, H.T., A.C., L.J.H., A.A.C., and T.C.; funding acquisition, L.J.H., M.N., and P.N.; investigation, E.E.W., A.A.C., H.T., and A.C.; resources, A.W.; project administration, A.C. and H.T.; methodology, H.T., A.C., A.A.C., and L.J.H.; formal analysis, A.C.; validation, H.T.; supervision, A.A.C. and L.J.H.; visualization, A.C. and H.T.; writing—original draft, A.C.; writing—review & editing, H.T., A.A.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Center for Colon Cancer Research, NCCAM, NIH 2 P01 AT003961-06A1, and University of South Carolina Electronic Research Administration (USCeRA) grant 11110-E193.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
References
- 1.Molodecky N.A., Soon I.S., Rabi D.M., Ghali W.A., Ferris M., Chernoff G., Benchimol E.I., Panaccione R., Ghosh S., Barkema H.W., et al. Increasing Incidence and Prevalence of the Inflammatory Bowel Diseases With Time, Based on Systematic Review. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:46–54. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lashner B.A., Kane S.V., Hanauer S.B. Colon cancer surveillance in chronic ulcerative colitis: Historical cohort study. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1990;85:1083–1087. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sartor R.B. Mechanisms of disease: Pathogenesis of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Nat. Clin. Pract. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2006;3:390–407. doi: 10.1038/ncpgasthep0528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pavlick K.P., Laroux F.S., Fuseler J., Wolf R.E., Gray L., Hoffman J., Grisham M.B. Role of reactive metabolites of oxygen and nitrogen in inflammatory bowel disease. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2002;33:311–322. doi: 10.1016/S0891-5849(02)00853-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pravda J. Radical induction theory of ulcerative colitis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2005;11:2371–2384. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i16.2371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tanida S., Mizoshita T., Mizushima T., Sasaki M., Shimura T., Kamiya T., Kataoka H., Joh T. Involvement of oxidative stress and mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1 (MAdCAM-1) in inflammatory bowel disease. J. Clin. Biochem. Nutr. 2011;48:112–116. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.10-41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Esworthy R., Aranda R., Martín M.G., Doroshow J.H., Binder S.W., Chu F.-F. Mice with combined disruption of Gpx1 and Gpx2 genes have colitis. Am. J. Physiol. Liver Physiol. 2001;281:G848–G855. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.2001.281.3.G848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kruidenier L. Attenuated mild colonic inflammation and improved survival from severe DSS-colitis of transgenic Cu/Zn-SOD mice. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2003;34:753–765. doi: 10.1016/S0891-5849(02)01426-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Oku T., Iyama S., Sato T., Sato Y., Tanaka M., Sagawa T., Kuribayashi K., Sumiyosi T., Murase K., Machida T., et al. Amelioration of murine dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis by ex vivo extracellular superoxide dismutase gene transfer. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2006;12:630–640. doi: 10.1097/01.MIB.0000225335.68614.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Watterlot L., Rochat T., Sokol H., Cherbuy C., Bouloufa I., Lefèvre F., Gratadoux J.-J., Honvo-Hueto E., Chilmonczyk S., Blugeon S. Intragastric administration of a superoxide dismutase-producing recombinant Lactobacillus casei BL23 strain attenuates DSS colitis in mice. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010;144:35–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.03.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Blonski W., Lichtenstein G.R. Safety of biologic therapy. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2007;13:769–796. doi: 10.1002/ibd.20027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Domm S., Cinatl J., Mrowietz U. The impact of treatment with tumour necrosis factor-α antagonists on the course of chronic viral infections: A review of the literature. Br. J. Dermatol. 2008;159:1217–1228. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08851.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kruis W., Schreiber S., Theuer D., Brandes J.-W., Schütz E., Howaldt S., Krakamp B., Hämling J., Mönnikes H., Koop I., et al. Low dose balsalazide (1.5 g twice daily) and mesalazine (0.5 g three times daily) maintained remission of ulcerative colitis but high dose balsalazide (3.0 g twice daily) was superior in preventing relapses. Gut. 2001;49:783–789. doi: 10.1136/gut.49.6.783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lichtenstein G.R., Abreu M.T., Cohen R., Tremaine W. American Gastroenterological Association Institute Medical Position Statement on Corticosteroids, Immunomodulators, and Infliximab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:935–939. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.01.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Head K.A., Jurenka J.S. Inflammatory bowel disease Part 1: Ulcerative colitis--pathophysiology and conventional and alternative treatment options. Altern. Med. Rev. A J. Clin. Ther. 2003;8:247–283. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hilsden R.J., Verhoef M.J., Best A., Pocobelli G. Complementary and alternative medicine use by Canadian patients with inflammatory bowel disease: Results from a national survey. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2003;98:1563–1568. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07519.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cui X., Jin Y., Poudyal D., Chumanevich A.A., Davis T., Windust A., Hofseth A., Wu W., Habiger J., Pena E., et al. Mechanistic insight into the ability of American ginseng to suppress colon cancer associated with colitis. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31:1734–1741. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgq163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jin Y., Kotakadi V.S., Ying L., Hofseth A.B., Cui X., Wood P.A., Windust A., Matesic L.E., Pena E.A., Chiuzan C., et al. American ginseng suppresses inflammation and DNA damage associated with mouse colitis. Carcinogenesis. 2008;29:2351–2359. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgn211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jin Y., Hofseth A.B., Cui X., Windust A.J., Poudyal D., Chumanevich A.A., Matesic L.E., Singh N.P., Nagarkatti M., Nagarkatti P.S., et al. American ginseng suppresses colitis through p53-mediated apoptosis of inflammatory cells. Cancer Prev. Res. 2010;3:339–347. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-09-0116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Poudyal D., Cui X., Le P.M., Hofseth A.B., Windust A., Nagarkatti M., Nagarkatti P.S., Schetter A.J., Harris C.C., Hofseth L.J. A Key Role of microRNA-29b for the Suppression of Colon Cancer Cell Migration by American Ginseng. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e75034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Poudyal D., Cui X., Le P.M., Davis T., Hofseth A.B., Jin Y., Chumanevich A.A., Wargovich M.J., Nagarkatti M., Nagarkatti P.S., et al. A Limited Role of p53 on the Ability of a Hexane Fraction of American Ginseng to Suppress Mouse Colitis. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2012;2012:1–11. doi: 10.1155/2012/785739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Poudyal D., Le P.M., Davis T., Hofseth A.B., Chumanevich A., Chumanevich A.A., Wargovich M.J., Nagarkatti M., Nagarkatti P.S., Windust A., et al. A hexane fraction of American ginseng suppresses mouse colitis and associated colon cancer: Anti-inflammatory and proapoptotic mechanisms. Cancer Prev. Res. 2012;5:685–696. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Buendia I., Michalska P., Navarro E., Gameiro I., Egea J., León R. Nrf2–ARE pathway: An emerging target against oxidative stress and neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative diseases. Pharmacol. Ther. 2016;157:84–104. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2015.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Qu C., Li B., Lai Y., Li H., Windust A., Hofseth L.J., Nagarkatti M., Nagarkatti P.S., Wang X.L., Tang N., et al. Identifying panaxynol, a natural activator of nuclear factor erythroid-2 related factor 2 (Nrf2) from American ginseng as a suppressor of inflamed macrophage-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015;168:326–336. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2015.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Truong V.-L., Bak M.J., Jeong W.-S. Chemopreventive Activity of Red Ginseng Oil in a Mouse Model of Azoxymethane/Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Inflammation-Associated Colon Carcinogenesis. J. Med. Food. 2019;22:578–586. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2018.4328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Choi J.H., Lee M.J., Jang M., Kim H.-J., Lee S., Lee S.W., Kim Y.O., Cho I.-H. Panax ginseng exerts antidepressant-like effects by suppressing neuroinflammatory response and upregulating nuclear factor erythroid 2 related factor 2 signaling in the amygdala. J. Ginseng Res. 2017;42:107–115. doi: 10.1016/j.jgr.2017.04.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhang B., Zhang X., Zhang C., Shen Q., Sun G., Sun X. Notoginsenoside R1 Protects db/db Mice against Diabetic Nephropathy via Upregulation of Nrf2-Mediated HO-1 Expression. Molecules. 2019;24:247. doi: 10.3390/molecules24020247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sohn J.J., Schetter A.J., Yfantis H.G., Ridnour L.A., Horikawa I., Khan M.A., Robles A.I., Hussain S.P., Goto A., Bowman E.D., et al. Macrophages, Nitric Oxide and microRNAs Are Associated with DNA Damage Response Pathway and Senescence in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e44156. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Iles K.E., Dickinson D.A., Wigley A.F., Welty N.E., Blank V., Forman H.J. HNE increases HO-1 through activation of the ERK pathway in pulmonary epithelial cells. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2005;39:355–364. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2005.03.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chumanevich A.A., Chaparala A., Witalison E.E., Tashkandi H., Hofseth A.B., Lane C., Pena E., Liu P., Pittman D.L., Nagarkatti P.S., et al. Looking for the best anti-colitis medicine: A comparative analysis of current and prospective compounds. Oncotarget. 2016;8:228–237. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Paul G., Bataille F., Obermeier F., Bock J., Klebl F., Strauch U., Lochbaum D., Rümmele P., Farkas S., Schölmerich J., et al. Analysis of intestinal haem-oxygenase-1 (HO-1) in clinical and experimental colitis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2005;140:547–555. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2005.02775.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kupai K., Almási N., Kósa M., Nemcsók J., Murlasits Z., Török S., Al-Awar A., Baráth Z., Pósa A., Varga C. H2S confers colonoprotection against TNBS-induced colitis by HO-1 upregulation in rats. Inflammopharmacology. 2017;26:479–489. doi: 10.1007/s10787-017-0382-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zhu H., Li Y. Oxidative stress and redox signaling mechanisms of inflammatory bowel disease: Updated experimental and clinical evidence. Exp. Biol. Med. 2012;237:474–480. doi: 10.1258/ebm.2011.011358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Shepela C. The safety of biologic agents in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Minn. Med. 2008;91:42–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Budanov A. The role of tumor suppressor p53 in the antioxidant defense and metabolism. Subcell. Biochem. 2014;85:337–358. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9211-0_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Puzio-Kuter A.M. The Role of p53 in Metabolic Regulation. Genes Cancer. 2011;2:385–391. doi: 10.1177/1947601911409738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kobayashi E.H., Suzuki T., Funayama R., Nagashima T., Hayashi M., Sekine H., Tanaka N., Moriguchi T., Motohashi H., Nakayama K., et al. Nrf2 suppresses macrophage inflammatory response by blocking proinflammatory cytokine transcription. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:11624. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Arisawa T., Tahara T., Shibata T., Nagasaka M., Nakamura M., Kamiya Y., Fujita H., Yoshioka D., Okubo M., Hirata I., et al. Nrf2 gene promoter polymorphism and gastric carcinogenesis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008;55:750–754. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Arisawa T., Tahara T., Shibata T., Nagasaka M., Nakamura M., Kamiya Y., Fujita H., Yoshioka D., Okubo M., Sakata M., et al. Nrf2 gene promoter polymorphism is associated with ulcerative colitis in a Japanese population. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008;55:394–397. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Osburn W.O., Karim B., Dolan P.M., Liu G., Yamamoto M., Huso D.L., Kensler T.W. Increased colonic inflammatory injury and formation of aberrant crypt foci in Nrf2-deficient mice upon dextran sulfate treatment. Int. J. Cancer. 2007;121:1883–1891. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Schneider K.S., Chan J.Y. Emerging Role of Nrf2 in Adipocytes and Adipose Biology123. Adv. Nutr. 2013;4:62–66. doi: 10.3945/an.112.003103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Joshi G., Johnson J.A. The Nrf2-ARE pathway: A valuable therapeutic target for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. Recent Pat. CNS Drug Discov. 2012;7:218–229. doi: 10.2174/157488912803252023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Li J., Ichikawa T., Janicki J.S., Cui T. Targeting the Nrf2 pathway against cardiovascular disease. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets. 2009;13:785–794. doi: 10.1517/14728220903025762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kwak M.-K., Kensler T.W. Targeting NRF2 signaling for cancer chemoprevention. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2009;244:66–76. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2009.08.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Papalois A., Gioxari A., Kaliora A., Lymperopoulou A., Agrogiannis G., Papada E., Andrikopoulos N.K. Chios Mastic Fractions in Experimental Colitis: Implication of the Nuclear Factor κB Pathway in Cultured HT29 Cells. J. Med. Food. 2012;15:974–983. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2012.0018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]