Abstract
Objective(s):
Somatostatin receptor-positive neuroendocrine tumors have been targeted using various peptide analogs radiolabeled with therapeutic radionuclides for years. The better biomedical properties of radioantagonists as higher tumor uptake make these radioligands more attractive than agonists for somatostatin receptor-targeted radionuclide therapy. In this study, we tried to evaluate the efficiency of Luthetium-177 (177Lu) radiolabeled DOTA-Peptide 2 (177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2) as a new radioantagonist in HT-29 human colorectal cancer in vitro and in vivo.
Methods:
DOTA conjugated antagonistic peptide with the sequence of p-Cl-Phe-Cyclo(D-Cys-L-BzThi-D-Aph-Lys-Thr-Cys)-D-Tyr-NH2 (DOTA-Peptide 2) was labeled with 177Lu. In vitro assays (saturation binding assay and internalization test) and animal biodistribution were performed in human colon adenocarcinoma cells (HT-29) and HT-29 tumor-bearing nude mice.
Results:
177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 showed high stability in acetate buffer and human plasma (>97%). Antagonistic property of 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 was confirmed by low internalization in HT-29 cells (<5%). The desired dissociation constant (Kd =11.14 nM) and effective tumor uptake (10.89 percentage of injected dose per gram of tumor) showed high binding affinity of 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 to somatostatin receptors.
Conclusion:
177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 demonstrated selective and high binding affinity to somatostatin receptors overexpressed on the surface of HT-29 cancer cells, which could make this radiopeptide suitable for somatostatin receptor-targeted radionuclide therapy.
Key Words: Somatostatin, Lutetium-177, Antagonistic peptide, Human colon- adenocarcinoma cells
Introduction
Therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals based on beta-emitting radionuclides have been utilized to treat various diseases for decades (1). Proteins and their fragments (monoclonal antibodies, nanobodies, peptides) and small molecules (steroids, phosphonate ligands and, etc.) conjugated to therapeutic radionuclides such as iodine-131 (131I), lutetium-177 (177Lu) and yttrium-90 (90Y) have been developed for the treatment of benign and malignant disorders(2).
Nowadays, targeted radionuclide therapy as a specific treatment of cancers is performed to expose the tumor cells by high doses of ionizing radiation, reduce the radiation toxic effects on healthy cells, and simultaneous destruction of primary and metastatic tumors (3). Overexpression of peptide receptors on the surface of cancer cells has established the peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) as an efficient method to treat a variety of cancers (4–6). 177Lu-labeled peptide analogues like bombesin (7), prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) (8), substance P (9), Cholecystokinin (CCK) (10), α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH) (11) have been assessed for treatment of many types of cancers based on the desirable 177Lu therapeutic properties.
Somatostatin (SST) receptors overexpressed in neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are the most widely used targets for PRRT and varied sequences of somatostatin labeled with therapeutic radionuclides have been designed for the treatment of NETs. Of all SST analogs, DOTA-Tyr3-octreotide (DOTA-TOC) and DOTA-Tyr3-octreotate (DOTA-TATE) radiolabeled with therapeutic radionuclides are the most commonly used SST receptor agonists applied in PRRT so that the 177Lu-DOTA-TATE was approved by U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA)(4,12).
Despite the extensive studies on SST receptor agonists, it has been indicated that SST receptor antagonists with lower receptor internalization show higher tumor uptake compared to corresponding agonists. Different new 177Lu-labeled somatostatin antagonists like 177Lu-DOTA-BASS and 177Lu-DOTA-JR11 have been developed in recent years due to their desirable properties including the better pharmacokinetic the as well as higher tumor uptake and effective dose(13).
In the present study, we assessed our new published 177Lu-labeled antagonistic peptide (177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2, Figure 1) (14) for stability, receptor binding affinity to SST receptors on human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line HT-29, and biodistribution in HT-29 tumor-bearing mice models.
Figure 1.

Chemical structure of 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2
Methods
Materials
The antagonistic peptide (DOTA-Peptide 2) with the sequence of ([(1, 4, 7, 10-Tricarboxymethyl-1, 4, 7, 10-tetrazacyclododec-1-yl) acetyl]-(L) p-Chlorophenylalanyl-(D) Cysteinyl-(L)-3-Benzo-Thienylalanyl (L-BzThi)-(D)-4-Aminocarbamoyl- phenylalanyl(D-Aph)-(L)-Lysyl-(L)-Threoninyl-(L)-Cysteinyl-(D)-Tyrosine-NH2-cyclic disulfide) was synthesized using the previously reported method(14).
177Lu Trichloride (177LuCl3) and DOTA-TATE were prepared by Pars Isotope Co. (Tehran, Iran). Human colon adenocarcinoma cells (HT-29) was purchased from the Pasteur Institute of Iran (Tehran, Iran). All chemicals and solvents used in our work were of analytical reagent (AR) grade.
Instant thin-layer chromatography (ITLC) was performed using TLC–silica gel sheets (Gelman Sciences, Washington, DC, USA) which were plotted using a MiniGITA TLC Scanner (Elysia-raytest GmbH, Germany). Radiochemical purity (RCP) of radiopeptide was evaluated by high-performance liquid chromatography (C18-RPHPLC, Sykam S7131, Eresing, Germany) equipped with a Gabi radioactivity detector (Raytest-Gabi, Straubenhardt, Germany).
Radiosynthesis and stability study of 177 Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2
Radiosynthesis and stability study of 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 Radiolabeling of DOTA-Peptide 2, stability in ammonium acetate buffer and human plasma and quality control procedures were performed based on the previous study (14). Briefly, 177LuCl3 solution (25 µL, 120 MBq) was added to DOTA-Peptide 2 in ammonium acetate buffer (0.25 M, pH=5.0) and heated at 95°C for 30 min. RCP was determined by Radio-HPLC (0.1% TFA (solvent A) acetonitrile (solvent B), gradient program: 0–8 min, 20%–65% solvent B, flow rate: 1.0 mL/min) and Radio-TLC (citrate buffer 0.1 M (pH=5.0) as mobile phase).
In-vitro stability of 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 (20 µL, 5 MBq) in ammonium acetate buffer solution (500 μL, 0.25 M, pH=5) was evaluated for 3 days post-labeling at room temperature (25°C) by radio-TLC. The plasma stability of 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 (50 µL, 12 MBq) was assessed at 37 ˚C for 1, 4 and 24 h as well. After each interval, plasma proteins were precipitated by cold ethanol, the mixture was centrifuged RCP of supernatant was reported by ITLC (14).
Cell culture and animal models
The HT-29 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 (Gibco, UK) complemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2% L-Glutamine solution 2 mM, penicillin (50 U/mL) and streptomycin (50 μg/mL) in a humidified atmosphere at 37°C with 5% CO2(15).
All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the national research council's guide and the investigation was approved by the ethical committee at Tehran University of Medical Sciences (Code no: IR.TUMS.VCR.REC.1397.894). To develop tumor-bearing mice models, male athymic nude mice (8 week, 18-23 gr, Pasteur Institute of Iran) were subcutaneously injected with HT-29 cells (7×106 cells in 0.1 mL PBS) into the right shoulders.
Cell binding affinity test
The HT-29 cells were seeded in 6-well plates (approximately 105 cells/ 2 mL RPMI per well) and incubated at 37˚C for 24 h. Afterwards, the cells were treated with different concentrations (1-100 nM) of 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 and incubated for 60 min at 37°C. To estimate the non-specific binding of radiopeptide to SST receptors, a 1,000-fold molar excess of octreotide was added to some wells 30 min before the addition of 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2. The cells were harvested after washing twice with PBS and the bound activity was measured using a gamma counter (EG&G/ORTEC, Model 4001M). Dissociation constant (Kd) and the total concentration of SST receptors expressed on HT-29 cells (Bmax) values were calculated by plotting the specific binding versus the concentration of 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 (nM) using software (Prism; GraphPad) (16, 17). All experiments were conducted in triplicate.
Internalization Study
The internalization study of 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 was performed in HT-29 cells. Approximately 105 cells per well were seeded in 6-well plates (triplicate for each time) and incubated for 24 h at 37˚C with 5% CO2. The cells were treated with 2.5 pmol of radioligand and washed with PBS at 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 h after treatment. The cells were incubated with 1 mL glycine buffer 0.1 M (pH=2.8) twice for 5 min and then rinsed with 1 mL PBS. Finally, 1 mL NaOH 1 N was added to lyse the cells (three times) and the internalized radioactivity was measured in a gamma counter. Specific internalization was evaluated in the presence of an excess amount of octreotide (5 nmol). The percentage of the applied radioactivity calculated as internalization results (16, 18).
Biodistribution studies
Approximately 3 weeks after cell implantation, biodistribution studies were performed in HT-29-bearing nude mice (19). Mice models were intravenously injected with 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 (10 MBq) in 100 µL sterile saline. At 1, 4, and 24 h after injection, mice were sacrificed under anaesthesia, removed organs were weighted and heir radioactivity was counted using a gamma counter. Blocking studies were carried out by the intravenous injection of octreotide (50 μg) in 100 µL normal saline. To compare, biodistribution study of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE (10 MBq in 100 µL) was done in the tumor mice as well. The results were reported as the percentage of injected dose per gram (%ID/g) of organ or tissue mass (20).
Results
Radiosynthesis and stability study of 177 Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2
RCP of 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 was obtained >98% by radio-HPLC (Rt: radiopeptide 17.38 min, free 177Lu 5.23 min) and radio-TLC (Rf: radiolabeled peptide 0.3-0.4, free 177Lu 0.9- 1.0) procedures.
The stability assessment of 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 in ammonium acetate buffer solution showed more than 95% of RCP during 3 days. The RCP of 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 in human plasma was calculated > 97% for 24 h at 37˚C (Table 1).
Table 1.
Stability study of 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 in acetate buffer and human plasma. Values represent mean±SD, (n=3)
| Time | 1 | 4 | 24 | 48 | 72 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (h) Medium | ||||||
| Acetate buffer | 99.3±0.32 | 99.2±0.21 | 98.9±0.43 | 98.3±0.56 | 96.7±0.87 | |
| Human plasma | 99.2±0.17 | 98.3±0.35 | 97.6±0.44 | - | - |
Determination of K d and B max
Human colon adenocarcinoma cells (HT-29) were utilized for saturation binding assay. As shown in figure 2, Kd and Bmax values for 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 were determined by specific binding curve and obtained 11.14±2.10 nM and 0.25±0.01 pmol/106 cells, respectively.
Figure 2.

Saturation binding curve for 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 in HT-29 cells
Internalization study
Cell internalization was studied using HT-29 cells at 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 h after treatment with 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2. As shown in Figure 3, negligible internalization (~ 5%) was observed for 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 in HT-29 cells.
Figure 3.

Internalization of 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 in HT-29 cells
Biodistribution in tumor-bearing mice
The distribution of radioactivity and tumor-to-organ ratios for 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 in the tumor-bearing mice at 1, 4 and 24 h after injection were shown in Table 2 and Figure 4, respectively.
Table 2.
Biodistribution of 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 and 177Lu-DOTA-TATE in HT-29 tumor-bearing mice. Values represent mean±SD, (n=3)
| %ID/g organ | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 | *Blocking Tumor | 177Lu-DOTA-TATE | |||
| Organ | 1 h | 4 h | 24 h | 4 h | 4 h |
| Blood | 0.31±0.04 | 0.11±0.02 | 0.02±0.01 | 0.10±0.07 | 0.71±0.06 |
| Liver | 6.66±1.90 | 2.54±0.70 | 0.73±0.40 | 3.03±0.50 | 2.74±0.60 |
| Kidneys | 14.57±4.20 | 10.85±3.30 | 7.79±2.80 | 13.34±6.20 | 9.48±4.10 |
| Stomach | 19.58±4.10 | 15.60±3.70 | 8.4±2.10 | 2.2±1.20 | 4.32±1.71 |
| Heart | 1.33±0.45 | 1.17±0.15 | 0.32±0.07 | 0.8±0.02 | 1.04±0.08 |
| Spleen | 3.33±1.30 | 2.8±1.10 | 0.89±0.40 | 0.78±0.40 | 1.72±1.60 |
| Pancreas | 50.22±10.60 | 41.56±7.70 | 19.63±8.70 | 5.22±3.80 | 17.05±9.50 |
| Lung | 10.12±4.37 | 5.91±2.45 | 4.28±2.07 | 1.08±0.60 | 3.08±1.10 |
| Intestine | 4.19±4.40 | 3.55±2.35 | 1.31±0.80 | 2.10±2.47 | 3.52±1.97 |
| Muscle | 0.3±0.10 | 0.12±0.10 | 0.11±0.07 | 0.18±0.10 | 0.15±0.08 |
| Tumor | 7.87±1.30 | 10.89±3.45 | 8.83±2.17 | 1.22±0.70 | 6.28±1.65 |
| Whole body | 2.8±0.67 | 1.31±0.12 | 1.19±0.40 | 2.64±0.82 | 2.08±0.71 |
*Octreotide (50 μg) in 0.1 mL saline as a co-injection
Figure 4.
Tumor-to-organ ratios at 1, 4 and 24 h after injection of 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2
The radiopeptide cleared fast from circulation and a significant uptake was observed in pancreas of tumor-bearing mice. Because of the hydrophilic nature of radiopeptide, renal clearance was the main elimination pathway.
Discussion
It has been reported plenty of preclinical and clinical studies on SST receptor agonistic and antagonistic peptides for targeted diagnosis and therapy of NETs (21, 22). Studies have revealed that binding of SST antagonists to their receptors leads to lower desensitization and internalization than agonists which provide a large number of binding sites and decreased dissociation rate than agonists (23).
In this research, we radiolabeled DOTA-Peptide 2 as an SST antagonistic peptide with 177Lu to evaluate its preclinical behavior in mice models (14). DOTA is known as the most used chelator for 177Lu radiolabeling which can form stable coordination complexes (log KML=23.5) (24). Therefore, RCP of 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 showed high radiolabeling yield and favorable stability in buffer solution and human plasma.
The expression analysis of SST receptors in HT-29 human colon adenocarcinoma cells using various methods like reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (25), western-blot (15), fluorescence imaging (19) and immunocytochemistry (26) showed the expression of all SST receptor subtypes (SSTR1-5) in HT-29 cells. Since the acceptable in-vitro results were obtained in our previous study for C6 glioma cells (Kd=12.06 nM) (14), the binding affinity of our radiopeptide was evaluated by saturation binding assay and internalization study using HT-29 cells. Considerable binding affinity to SST receptors was observed for 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 (Kd=11.14 nM) which was comparable with the obtained Kd of 177Lu-DOTA-BASS (8.16 nM) (27) as a favorable SSTR2 antagonist with the similar radiometal and chelating agent.
As expected, low internalization of radiopeptide (5%) in HT-29 cells after 6 h confirmed the antagonistic behavior of this radioligand. Intracellular localization of therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals could be advantageous in targeted radionuclide therapy. A receptor antagonist remains bound to the cell membrane on average at a larger distance from the nucleus and its DNA content which it might reduce the number of β-particles effectively reaching the DNA to induce damage. But due to high tissue rang of beta particles (~ 700 µm for 177Lu) and crossfire effect by β-emitting radionuclides, therapeutic effect could be obtained by radioantagonists and without cellular internalization (28, 29).
Renal clearance was the main elimination pathway for 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 due to the hydrophilic nature of the radiopeptide, hepatobiliary excretion was observed in biodistribution assay using HT-29 xenograft mice models though (30). The main differences between the biodistribution of an antagonist (177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2) and agonist (177Lu-DOTA-TATE) were observed in organs with the expression of somatostatin receptors like stomach and pancreas. Due to the higher tendency of antagonists to bind the SST receptors than agonists, it is expected that higher radioactivity is accumulated in these organs. Therefore, higher uptake of 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 in mentioned organs than 177Lu-DOTA-TATE could confirm the antagonistic property of our radioligand. This phenomenon was also reported for antagonistic radiopeptides as 177Lu-DOTA-JR11 (31) and 177Lu-DOTA-sst2-ANT (27). On the other hand, higher accumulation of radiopeptide in SST expressing organs can cause more damages to them. But, it has been reported that tumor effective dose by radioantagonists will be 2-times more than radioagonists only using 50% of applied activity for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Therefore, reduced radiation to non-target organs as well as higher tumor efficient dose could be achieved by lower standard dose for agonists. This property is one of the advantages of radioantagonists (32). The most accumulation of 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 in tumor was obtained at 4 h post-injection (10.89% ID/g), whereas this value was significantly decreased to 1.22% after injection of Octreotide as an SSTRs blocking agent (p<0.05). Octreotide is a somatostatin analogue which is considered as the gold standard for systemic therapy of advanced neuroendocrine tumors because of the capability of this ligand to bind to SST receptors with a high affinity. Therefore, octreotide was used in blocking tests to ensure the occupation of all SST receptors on the surface of cells. The reduction in tumor uptake indicated the specific binding of 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 to SSTRs. Decreased tumor uptake for 177Lu-DOTA-TATE (6.28%) compared to 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 (10.89%) may be due to agonistic property of this radiopeptide.
Conclusion
Treatment of neuroendocrine tumors using SSTR-targeting radiopeptides have been utilized for years. Radiolabeled SSTR antagonists have been developed for SSTR overexpressed tumors due to desirable characteristics of antagonists. In this study, 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 as an SST radioantagonist manifested high in vitro stability and good affinity to SSTRs. Acceptable tumor uptake and the high tumor-to-blood ratio of 177Lu-DOTA-Peptide 2 could introduce this radiopeptide as a therapeutic agent for colorectal adenocarcinoma in human.
Acknowledgements
This research was a part of a PhD thesis at Tehran University of Medical Sciences [Code no. 97-03-58- 39735] and supported by Iranian National Science Foundation [Grant no. 96005739], Tehran, Iran.
References
- 1.Yeong C-H, Ng K-H, Cheng M. Therapeutic radionuclides in nuclear medicine: Current and future prospects. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2014;15(10):845–63. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1400131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Banerjee S, Pillai MRA, Knapp FF. Lutetium-177 therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals: Linking chemistry, radiochemistry, and practical applications. Chem Rev. 2015;115(8):2934–74. doi: 10.1021/cr500171e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dash A, Chakraborty S, Pillai MRA, Knapp FF (Russ) Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy: An overview. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2015;30(2):47–71. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2014.1741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bison SM, Konijnenberg MW, Melis M, Pool SE, Bernsen MR, Teunissen JJM, et al. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy using radiolabeled somatostatin analogs: Focus on future developments. Clin Transl Imaging. 2014;2(1):55–66. doi: 10.1007/s40336-014-0054-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fani M, Maecke HR, Okarvi SM. Radiolabeled peptides: Valuable tools for the detection and treatment of cancer. Theranostics. 2012;2(5):481–501. doi: 10.7150/thno.4024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Reubi JC. Peptide receptors as molecular targets for cancer diagnosis and therapy. Endocr Rev. 2003;24(4):389–427. doi: 10.1210/er.2002-0007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Stott Reynolds T P, Bandari R, Jiang Z J, Smith C. Lutetium-177 labeled bombesin peptides for radionuclide therapy. Curr Radiopharm. 2015;9(1):33–43. doi: 10.2174/1874471008666150313112922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rahbar K, Afshar-Oromieh A, Jadvar H, Ahmadzadehfar H. PSMA theranostics: Current status and future directions. Mol Imaging. 2018;17:1–9. doi: 10.1177/1536012118776068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.De Araújo EB, Pujatti PB, Mengatti J. Radiolabeling of substance P with lutetium-177 And biodistribution study in rat pancreatic tumor xenografted NUDE mice. Cell Mol Biol. 2010;56(2):12–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cho EH, Lim JC, Lee SY, Jung SH. An assessment tumor targeting ability of 177Lu labeled cyclic CCK analogue peptide by binding with cholecystokinin receptor. J Pharmacol Sci. 2016;131(3):209–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jphs.2016.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Miao Y, Shelton T, Quinn TP. Therapeutic efficacy of a 177Lu-labeled DOTA conjugated α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone peptide in a murine melanoma-bearing mouse model. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2009;22(3):333–41. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2007.376.A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Barbieri F, Bajetto A, Pattarozzi A, Gatti M, Würth R, Thellung S, et al. Peptide receptor targeting in cancer: The somatostatin paradigm. Int J Pept. 2013;2013:1–20. doi: 10.1155/2013/926295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fani M, Nicolas GP, Wild D. Somatostatin receptor antagonists for imaging and therapy. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:61S–66S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.186783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Behnammanesh H, Jokar S, Erfani M, Geramifar P, Sabzevari O, Amini M, et al. Design, preparation and biological evaluation of a 177Lu-labeled somatostatin receptor antagonist for targeted therapy of neuroendocrine tumors. Bioorg Chem. 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.103381. doi:10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.103381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Colucci R, Blandizzi C, Ghisu N, Florio T, Del Tacca M. Somatostatin inhibits colon cancer cell growth through cyclooxygenase-2 downregulation. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;155(2):198–209. doi: 10.1038/bjp.2008.268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rylova SN, Stoykow C, Del Pozzo L, Abiraj K, Tamma ML, Kiefer Y, et al. The somatostatin receptor 2 antagonist 64Cu-NODAGA-JR11 outperforms 64Cu-DOTA-TATE in a mouse xenograft model. PLoS One. 2018;13(4):1–16. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wadas TJ, Eiblmaier M, Zheleznyak A, Sherman CD, Ferdani R, Liang K, et al. Preparation and biological evaluation of 64Cu-CB-TE2A-sst2-ANT, a somatostatin antagonist for PET imaging of somatostatin receptor-positive tumors. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(11):1819–27. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.054502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.de Araújo EB, Caldeira Filho JS, Nagamati LT, Muramoto E, Colturato MT, Couto RM, et al. A comparative study of 131I and 177Lu labeled somatostatin analogues for therapy of neuroendocrine tumours. Appl Radiat Isot. 2009;67(2):227–33. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kostenich G, Oron-Herman M, Kimel S, Livnah N, Tsarfaty I, Orenstein A. Diagnostic targeting of colon cancer using a novel fluorescent somatostatin conjugate in a mouse xenograft model. Int J Cancer. 2008;122(9):2044–9. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Liu F, Zhu H, Yu J, Han X, Xie Q, Liu T, et al. 68Ga/177Lu-labeled DOTA-TATE shows similar imaging and biodistribution in neuroendocrine tumor model. Tumor Biol. 2017;39(6):1–9. doi: 10.1177/1010428317705519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mikołajczak R, Maecke HR. Radiopharmaceuticals for somatostatin receptor imaging. Nucl Med Rev. 2016;19(2):126–32. doi: 10.5603/NMR.2016.0024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bodei L, Kwekkeboom DJ, Kidd M, Modlin IM, Krenning EP. Radiolabeled somatostatin analogue therapy of gastroenteropancreatic cancer. Semin Nucl Med. 2016;46(3):225–38. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2015.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fani M, Peitl P, Velikyan I. Current status of radiopharmaceuticals for the theranostics of neuroendocrine neoplasms. Pharmaceuticals. 2017;10(30):1–22. doi: 10.3390/ph10010030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Price EW, Orvig C. Matching chelators to radiometals for radiopharmaceuticals. Chemical Society Reviews. 2014;43(1):260–90. doi: 10.1039/c3cs60304k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ayiomamitis GD, Notas G, Zaravinos A, Drygiannakis I, Georgiadou M, Sfakianaki O, et al. Effects of octreotide and insulin on colon cancer cellular proliferation and correlation with hTERT activity. Oncoscience. 2014;1(6):457–467. doi: 10.18632/oncoscience.58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Modarai SR, Opdenaker LM, Viswanathan V, Fields JZ, Boman BM. Somatostatin signaling via SSTR1 contributes to the quiescence of colon cancer stem cells. BMC Cancer. 2016;16(1):1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2969-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang X, Fani M, Schulz S, Rivier J, Reubi JC, Maecke HR. Comprehensive evaluation of a somatostatin-based radiolabelled antagonist for diagnostic imaging and radionuclide therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39(12):1876–85. doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2231-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cescato R, Waser B, Fani M, Reubi JC. Evaluation of 177Lu-DOTA-sst2 antagonist versus 177Lu-DOTA-sst2 agonist binding in human cancers in vitro. Journal of nuclear medicine. 2011 ;52(12):1886–90. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.095778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dalm SU, Nonnekens J, Doeswijk GN, de Blois E, van Gent DC, Konijnenberg MW, de Jong M. Comparison of the therapeutic response to treatment with a 177Lu-labeled somatostatin receptor agonist and antagonist in preclinical models. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2016 ;57(2):260–5. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.167007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Fani M, Del Pozzo L, Abiraj K, Mansi R, Tamma ML, Cescato R, et al. PET of somatostatin receptor-positive tumors using 64Cu- and 68Ga-somatostatin antagonists: The chelate makes the difference. J Nucl Med. 2011;52(7):1110–8. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.087999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nicolas GP, Mansi R, McDougall L, Kaufmann J, Bouterfa H, Wild D, et al. Biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, and dosimetry of 177Lu-, 90Y-, and 111In-labeled somatostatin receptor antagonist OPS201 in comparison to the agonist 177Lu-DOTATATE: The mass effect. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(9):1435–41. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.191684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wild D, Fani M, Fischer R, Del Pozzo L, Kaul F, Krebs S, Rivier JE, Reubi JC, Maecke HR, Weber WA. Comparison of somatostatin receptor agonist and antagonist for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy: a pilot study. Journal of nuclear medicine. 2014;55(8):1248–52. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.138834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

