Skip to main content
PMC home page
Plants logoLink to Plants
. 2020 Jun 12;9(6):740. doi: 10.3390/plants9060740

A New Ferula (Apiaceae) Species from Southwest Anatolia: Ferula pisidica Akalın & Miski

Emine Akalın 1,*, Hüseyin Onur Tuncay 1, Bülent Olcay 1, Mahmut Miski 2,*
PMCID: PMC7355485  PMID: 32545501

Abstract

Ferula pisidica is a novel endemic species found in the vicinity of Karaman province of inner Mediterranean Region of Turkey. F. pisidica is morphologically distinct from F. haussknechtii and F. brevipedicellata by habit, sheaths, terminal leaf lobes, and mericarp size as well as by chemotaxonomic differences. The new species is described by morphological, carpological, ecological and phytochemical characteristics. Its relationships with the other related species and proposed conservation status will be reviewed.

Keywords: Ferula, Ferula pisidica, new species, Turkey, Apiaceae, Anatolia, anatomy, chemotaxonomy

1. Introduction

The Apiaceae is one of the largest family of Plant Kingdom and shows extreme diversity in Angiosperm groups [1,2]. It is possible to evaluate as another indicator fewer number of species in the genera (434 genera and 3780 species, average 8.7 species (APG III)) diversity and variety in the family.

Ferula L. species were widespread in the temperate regions of Euro-Asian continent surrounded by Canary Islands in the West, China and India in the East, North Africa in the South, and Central Europe in the North. With more than 185 species, the genus Ferula is the largest genus of Apiaceae family [2,3]

The genus Ferula species distributed in the Irano-Turanian region was classified by Boissier into three sections based on the number of their vittae and the shape of their petals: Peucedanoides Boiss. Euferula Boiss. and Scrodosma Bunge [4].

Korovin introduced a novel and wider taxonomical classification by inclusion of the leaf and floral characteristics of Ferula species. However, he underestimated the carpological characters of genus [3]. Korovin defined six subgenera and eight sections in his monograph. Furthermore, he has divided each section into series or hybrid (grex) groups. In contrast, Safina and Pimenov have emphasized the fruit anatomy of Ferula and Peucedanoides sections while pointing out the heterogeneity amongst the species [5].

Cumulative analyses of 90 Ferula species based on molecular characters yielded quite different results in comparison with Korovin’s taxonomical classification [6]. In addition to the morphological characters, life cycle features and chemical classification data were used in this study which led to the definition of 12 sections by Safina and Pimenov [5].

Boissier was the first botanist who dealt with the Ferula species growing in Turkey [4]. Later, Peşmen listed 18 Ferula species (one of them as an incompletely known species) without any taxonomical subdivision of the genus in his monograph of Turkish Ferula species [7]. A recent revision of Ferula species growing in Turkey was completed by Sağıroğlu and Duman, with the introduction of four new species (i.e., F. coskunii H. Duman & M. Sağıroğlu, F. mervynii Sağıroğlu & H. Duman, F. brevipedicellata Peșmen ex Sağıroğlu & H. Duman and F. duranii Sağıroğlu & H. Duman) the total number of Ferula species growing in Turkey has reached 22 [8,9,10,11].

Due to the wide morphological variations and potential inter-species hybridization, taxonomical classification of Ferula species’ is very difficult. In order to resolve taxonomical issues of the genus, several recent publications were focused on the phylogenetic analyses of Ferula species [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19].

Recently, Panahi et al. compared nrDNA ITS and plastid DNA sequences of 153 samples from Irano-Turanian floristic region including some specimens from Turkey. Based on the data, a new classification system with four subgenera and 10 sections was proposed [17]. Results of this study were highly controversial and suggest the presence of intensive reticulate evolution for the Ferula specimens from Turkey. The Turkish Ferula species included in this study were classified under two subgenera: subgenus Ferula and subgenus Narthex (Falc.) Drude. F. communis L. and F. tingitana L. species were placed in the Section Ferula of Subgenus Ferula, F. caspica M. Bieb., F. haussknechtii H. Wolff ex Rech.f., F. orientalis L., F. rigidula Fisch. ex DC. were assigned to the Section Peucedanoides of Subgenus Narthex, F. szowitsiana DC. species was placed in the Section Merwia (Fedtsch.) Koso-Pol., and F. coskunii and F. mervynii were placed in the Section Stenocarpa of Subgenus Narthex along with F. stenocarpa Boiss. & Hausskn. ex Boiss., an endemic species from the Flora of Iran. These latter species were reconsidered as unusual species [17]. In another phylogenetic study that was performed simultaneously with the aforementioned paper, two monocarpic Turkish species; F. drudeana Korovin and F. huber-morathii Peşmen were included in Korovin’s Subgenus Merwia, whereas F. anatolica Boiss., F. mervynii and F. coskunii were identified as unassigned species [18]. These examples clearly illustrates the problems associated with the application of phylogenetic analyses to the taxonomical classification of Turkish Ferula species.

Except for F. jaeschkeana Vatke (i.e., chromosom number of 2n = 2x = 26), Ferula species are diploid with chromosome number of 2n = 22 and such information does not provide distinct taxonomical classification data [9,20,21].

Owing to the extremely large size of most Ferula species, majority of the herbarium specimens either contain fewer parts of the plant or selectively collected smaller plant samples that were not representative of the actual living specimen of species which inadvertently result in the incomplete description of many Ferula species. Furthermore, shape and anatomical characters of fruits and basal leaves were important criteria for the identification of species, and yet during the fruit formation phase basal leaves of some species disintegrates. Some type specimen of Ferula species only contain early or late development stage plant samples. In order to accomplish a correct description of a Ferula species, field observation of the living plants and collection of samples from several populations are very important.

Due to the difficulties encountered during the isolation and structure elucidation of complex sesquiterpenoid compounds from Ferula species, so far sesquiterpene based chemotaxonomic classification studies of Ferula species were not explored. Nevertheless, most significant secondary metabolites of Ferula species were sesquiterpenoid compounds that show unique chemical structure variations closely associated with their taxonomic status at the subgenera level. For example, Ferula species from Subgenus Merwia contain mainly sesquiterpene coumarin ethers and some sulfur containing compounds, on the other hand Ferula species from Subgenus Ferula yield both sesquiterpene coumarin ethers and sesquiterpene esters. In contrast, Ferula species from Subgenus Peucedanoides mainly afford sesquiterpene esters. Some of the major sesquiterpenoid metabolites isolated from the Ferula species growing in Turkey were shown in Figure 1. Ferula communis subsp. communis [22,23,24] and F. tingitana [25,26] from Subgenus Ferula yield several sesquiterpene coumarin ethers and sesquiterpene esters; F. elaeochytris Korov. [27], F. orientalis [28], F. rigidula [29], F. haussknechtii [30] and F. lycia Boiss. [31] from Subgenus Peucedanoides yield mainly daucane, apiene and germacrane sesquiterpene esters. Because of the presence of multiple chiral centers and variety of structural features such as mono-, di-, tricylic skeletons that vastly enhance their structural diversity, utilization of the sesquiterpenoid compounds as chemotaxonomic markers provide an unparalleled advantage over the use of classical phenolic chemotaxonomic markers such as flavonoids.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Various Sesquiterpenoid Compounds Isolated from the Ferula species Growing in Turkey.

In consideration of the aforementioned criteria, the taxonomic status of Ferula pisidica was extensively evaluated based on the comprehensive field observations, taxonomic survey and in depth chemotaxonomical analysis. Although it has some closely allied species in the Xeronarthex Korov. Section of Subgenus Peucedanoides (see Section 3.2), F. pisidica significantly differs from those species and has been confirmed as a new species.

2. Results

Ferula pisidica Akalın & Miski sp. nova (Figure 2 and Figure 3)

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(A) Habit of Ferula pisidica in habitat. (B) Umbel. (C) Basal Leaf.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(A,B) General view of F. pisidica fruits. (C,D) Basal leaf of F. pisidica. (E) Cross section of mericarp of F. pisidica (cr carpophore, cv commissural vittae, dv dorsal vittae, e endosperma, en endocarp, ex exocarp, fn funicle, me mesocarp, t testa, vb vascular bundle).

Type: Turkey. C4 Antalya: Near Beyreli village, 1550 m, 26 June 2015, 36°50′24.8′′ N, 32°22′14.41′′ E, M. Miski, E. Akalın & S. Anıl. (holotype: ISTE 117051)

F. haussknechtii and F. brevipedicellata are the closely allied species. F. haussknechtii differs by its shorter and slender habit, narrower and smaller sheaths, F. brevipedicellata differs by terminal leaf lobes ((3–)7–12 mm), larger and wider sheaths.

The petiole of basal leaves is 20–32 cm long in the new species, F. haussknechtii basal leaves sessile and F. brevipedicellata basal leaves petiole is 10–20 cm long.

2.1. Description

Erect, green, perennial herbs, polycarpic, 1–3 stemmed, up to 250 cm tall, solid, 1–3 cm diameter at base, stem glabrous and sulcate. Root 3–5 cm width with thick woody tap root system. Fibrous collar which are old petioles remains on the base of the stem. Leaves green, mostly basal, scabrid-setulose. Basal leaves petiolate, 50–72 cm long, 30–85 cm wide. Petioles of basal leaves 20–32 cm long. Basal leaves sheaths 4–9 cm long, 1–3 cm wide, not swollen. Petiole, equal or shorter than length of lamina. Basal leaf lamina (blade) triangular-ovate in outline; 25–40 cm long, 30–85 cm wide; 5–6 pennate; terminal lobes 2–3, each lobe 1–4 mm × 0.5–1.5 mm, linear, apex obtuse.

Cauline leaves with petioles 20–35 cm long, 12–30 cm wide. Cauline leaves with big or large broadly ovate sheath, 5–10 cm long, 4–8 cm wide, swollen.

Inflorescence paniculate-corymbose, central umbels composed of fertile flowers, lateral umbels composed of sterile flowers. Central umbels sessile or peduncle 1.5 cm long, lateral rays ascending, 8–22 rays, lateral rays 6–10 cm long, central rays 2–4 cm long, bracts caducous in fruiting time.

Umbellules (7–)9–15 flowered; pedicel at fruiting 2–8 mm long; sepals caducous in fruiting time. Petals yellow, setulose-scabrid on dorsal surface, 1–2 × 1 mm long. Filaments 1.5–2 mm long, reflexed, anthers ±oblong, 0.5–0.75 mm long. Stylopodium conical in fertile flowers, depressed in sterile flowers. Styles up to 2.5 mm long in fruit.

Mericarps oblong, 8–14 mm × 4–9 mm, depressed dorsally; brown when ripe; dorsal ridges filiform, lateral wings 0.5–1 mm wide, inferior wings up to 5 mm or absent, styles up to 2.5 mm long, dorsal vittae 1–3 per vallecula, commissural (2–)4–6.

Flowering time is from May to June and in fruit from June to July.

2.2. Carpology

In transversal section, mericarps shapes are elliptical (Figure 3). Cuticula is thin and smooth. Exocarp consists of thick-walled isodiametric cells in a single line. Exocarp is cut in the commissural area of 2 mericarps. Vascular bundles are placed in the dorsal ribs and lateral wings as a group consisting of vascular bundles. Each vascular bundle upper side is accompanied by some sclerenchymatous tissue. Trachea and tracheids are not distinguished from each other in xylem. Dorsal vittae are 1–3 per vallecula (one of them is bigger), commissural vittae (2–)4–6, two of them, which are located near the carpophore are bigger than others. Commissural vittae are bigger than vallecular vittae. Endocarp formed of single line and narrow thin-walled long cells. Cell walls are lignified.

2.3. Etymology

The new species is named after the ancient name of the region where it grows.

2.4. Holotype

C4 Antalya Near Beyreli village 26 June 2015, 36°50′24.8′′ N, 32°22′14.41′′ E, M. Miski, E. Akalın & S. Anıl (ISTE 117051).

2.5. Localities

C4 Antalya Near Beyreli village 26 June 2015, 36°50′24.8′′ N, 32°22′14.41′′ E, M. Miski, E. Akalın & S. Anıl (ISTE 117051); C4 Karaman, Ermenek near Damlaçal, 25 June 2015, 36°40′43.6′′ N, 32°56′35.55′′ E, M. Miski & S. Anıl (ISTE 117074) (Figure 4). All specimens collected from the same locality and date are deposited and preserved under the same ISTE number. Specimens will be available upon request.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Distribution of Ferula pisidica in Turkey.

2.6. Ecology

The species is spread in stony, rocky areas and in openings of sparsely woodland in the valley. High plants are mainly, Abies cilicica subsp. isaurica Coode & Cullen and Pinus nigra subsp. pallasiana (Lamb.) Holmboe trees and also Juniperus oxycedrus L. scrubs; Small plants, Dryopteris filix-mas (L.) Schott, Verbascum oreophilum C. Koch, Salvia candidissima subsp. occidentalis Hedge, Caucalis platycarpos L., Achillea setacea Waldst. & Kit., Astragalus pycnocephalus Fisch., Carduus nutans L., Vicia cracca L., Euphorbia macroclada Boiss., Galium aparine L., Nigella orientalis L. are widespread in the area. The endemic species of Erodium cedrorum subsp. salmoneum (P.H. Davis & Roberts) P.H. Davis are observed.

2.7. Distribution and Proposed Conservation Status

Ferula pisidica is an endemic species to Southwest Anatolia (between A7 and A9 squares) and only known from two localities; therefore, it is considered as ‘Endangered’ (criterion B1 a).

It could also be categorized as ‘Endangered’ (criterion B2) for its known ‘area of occupancy’ of less than 500 km2, population size estimated to be fewer than 250 mature individuals (criterion C).

It is recommended that the species of F. pisidica should be placed under World Conservation Union (IUCN) threat category ‘Endangered’ (EN) [32].

3. Discussion

3.1. Chemotaxonomic Characteristics

Preliminary phytochemical investigations on the roots of F. pisidica indicate that majority of the secondary metabolites of this species are sesquiterpene esters that is a characteristic feature of Ferula species of subgenus Peucedanoides. Absence of the sesquiterpene coumarins and/or sulfur-containing compounds clearly excludes this species from subgenera Scrodosma, Merwia, Narthex, Euferula and Dorematoides Korov. Based on their similar morphological characteristics F. haussknechtii was identified as the closely allied species of F. pisidica. However, while the roots of F. haussknechtii exclusively produce apiene ester derivatives, sesquiterpenes with eleven membered monocyclic skeleton (Figure 1, compounds 7 & 10) [30], the roots of F. pisidica yield cis- and trans-daucane esters, sesquiterpenes with 5 and 7 membered bicyclic skeleton (Figure 1, compounds 1, 2, 4, 6 & 9). Since the biogenetic pathways of apiene and daucane esters were different [30,33] and chemotaxonomically differs from F. haussknechtii which confirms the new species status of F. pisidica.

3.2. Relationship

There were two sets of criteria employed to differentiate the new species from those of closely allied species; morphological characters (internal-external) and chemotaxonomical profiles. Based on these criteria, differences of the new species from those of closely allied species were tabulated in the Table 1. Amongst all potentially related species, F. haussknechtii and F. brevipedicellata were identified as the most closely related species. While F. haussknechtii could be differentiated by its shorter and slender habit, narrower and smaller sheaths, F. brevipedicellata has longer terminal leaf lobes ((3–)7–12 mm) and larger, and wider sheath. However, most distinct difference between the new species and those closely allied species was the length of basal leaves petiole; the length of new species basal leaves petiole was 20–32 cm long, in contrast F. haussknechtii basal leaves sessile and F. brevipedicellata basal leaves petiole length varies between 10–20 cm long. In addition, mericarps of the new species are smaller than related species except F. elaeochytris. No specific differentiation was observed between the leaf hair morphology of new species and aforementioned Ferula species. Ferula species examined are as follows:

Table 1.

Comparison of diagnostic features of F. pisidica, F. haussknechtii, F. brevipedicellata, F. elaeochytris, F. rigidula, F. hermonis Boiss., F. halophila Peşmen.

Features F. pisidica F. haussknechtii F. brevipedicellata F. elaeochytris F. rigidula F. hermonis F. halophila
Stem length up to 250 cm 50–150 cm 100–250 cm 100–200 cm, terete 30–130 cm 100–150 cm, terete 60–90 cm
Leaves 5–7 pinnate, triangular ovate in outline, 25–40 × 30–85 cm 5 pinnate, triangular ovate in outline, 30–40 × 20–30 cm 5–6 pinnate, triangular ovate in outline, 30–65 × 20–45 cm 5–6 pinnate, triangular ovate in outline, 25–50 × 20–45 cm 5–6 pinnate, triangular ovate in outline, 15–30 × 10–25 cm 5–6 pinnate, triangular ovate in outline, 30–45 × 25–35 cm 5–6 pinnate, triangular ovate in outline
Petiole (basal leaves) 20–32 cm sessile 10–20 cm 17–40(-48) 1–12 cm - 8–10 cm
Ultimate segments 1–4 × 0.5–1.5 mm 0.5–3(–7) × 0.5–1.5 mm (3–)7–12 × 1–2.5 mm, 1.5–2.5 × 0.5 mm, 1–5(–8) x 0.2–0.8 mm, 1.5–3 × 0.4 mm, 5–15(–20) × 0.4–0.8 mm,
scabrid-setulose densely setulose-puberulent scabrid to glabrous glabrous scabrid glabrous very sparsely aculeolate-scabrid
Sheaths Ovate
4–9 × 1–3 cm		 Ovate-lanceolate
6–8 × 2–5.5 cm		 Broadly ovate
7–12 × 5–8 cm		 Ovate-oblong
(6–)10–15 cm		 Cylindric-oblong
3–12 × 1.5–3 cm		 - Ovate
6.5 × 7.5 cm
Rays 8–22 6–12 6–12(–18) 10–18 (4–)6–12(–15) 10–15 12–15
Petals Yellow Yellow Yellow Yellow Yellow Whitish-Green Yellow
Fruiting pedicels 2–8 mm (5–)7–10(–12) mm 0.5–6 mm 9–10 mm (5–)7–15 mm 4–6 mm 5–9 mm
Mericarps 8–14 × 4–9 mm, oblong 13–16 × 6 mm, elliptic-oblong 8–14 × 4–7 mm,
elliptic		 9–12 × 4–5 mm, elliptic-oblong 10–12 × 6–7 mm, oblong to obovate 10–13 × 6–7 mm, elliptic-oblong 9–11 × 6–7 mm, obovate
Lateral wings 0.5–1 mm wide 0.5–1 mm wide 0.5–1 mm wide 0.5–1 mm wide 1–2 mm wide 1–1.5 mm wide 2 mm wide
Dorsal vittae 1–3 per vallecula 1 per vallecula 1 per vallecula 1 per vallecula 1 per vallecula 1(–2) 1 per vallecula
Commissural vittae (2–)4–6 4 2–4 43,984 43,984 4–6 (2–)4
Open in a new tab

Ferula haussknechtii: B9 Bitlis, Betweeen Tatvan and Gevaş districts, near Obuz (Kamer) village, Saya Ö. 7 October 1983, 2000 m. (ISTE: 109377).; B9 Van, Tımar district, 3 km. on the hill near the crossroads Saya Ö. 20 July 1984., 1840 m. (ISTE: 109388).; B9 Van, Erek Mountain, Rocky slopes with Cachyris. Davis, Peter Hadland & Polunin, Oleg Vladimir. 18 July 1954, 2800 m. (Edinburgh: E00262871).

Ferula brevipedicellata: C7 Malatya, Sürgü district, Eski Kurucaova village, near the arable field. Yildiz B. 13 May 1989, 1500 m. (ISTE: 105387).; B9 Bitlis, Hizan district, 19 km after Hizan to Pervari district. 2 km after the bridge. Saya Ö. 20 June 1983. 1060 m. (ISTE: 109423).; B9 Bitlis Hizan-Bahçesaray road 22 km, Sağıroğlu M. 9 July 2002. 1000 m. (Edinburgh: E00656571)

Ferula elaeochytris: C6 Hatay, Bezge border police station. Baytop A., Baytop T., 17 May 1962. (ISTE: 7096).; C6 Hatay, Kel (Akra) Mountain, south-east side. Tuzlaci E., 27 May 1977, 1400 m. (ISTE: 37198).; Turkey, Siehe W. 15 July 1985 (Edinburgh: E00175321).; Prov. Maras, distr. Goksun: Binboga dag; on N. E. side of Isik dag, Davis, P.H.; Dodds, L.G.; Cetik, D. 16 July 1952. 1900 m. (KEW: K001097251).

Ferula rigidula: B5 Kayseri, Yahyalı district, Sazak way, Baytop A. Tuzlaci E., 19 June 1977, 1200 m. (ISTE: 37615).; B9 Iğdir, Tuzluca district, between Hadımlı and Sanabdal villages. Altundağ E. 2 October 2008, 1280 m. (ISTE: 85835).; A9 Kars: Kağızman to Akçay (Aras valley) 1100–1200 m. Dry gravelly hills. Perennial. Davis, Peter H. 19 July 1966. (Edinburgh: E00175311).

Ferula halophila: B4 Konya, Yavşan memlehası near Tuzgölü, Saline Artemisia step. Davis&Dodds., 8 June 1952; (ISTE: 21109) B6 Kayseri, Sarız. district Between Sarız and Pınarbaşı 4 km. near the crossroads. Saya Ö. 22 June 1984. 1650 m. (ISTE:109382).; Prov. Konya Distr. Cihanbeyli, Tuz gölü, nr. Yavsan Memlehesi, Davis. 9 September 1949. (Edinburgh: E00002485).

Ferula hermonis: Adana, Saimbeyli district, Bozoğlan mountain above Obruk yayla. Davis, Dodds & Çetik. 7 August 1952. 2000 m. (Edinburgh: E00175317, E00175316)

4. Materials and Methods

This study is based on field work, literature surveys and herbarium materials. The new species material was compared to the herbarium materials of Ferula in Herbarium of Istanbul University Faculty of Pharmacy (ISTE), Royal Botanic Gardens Kew (K), Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (E). Comparative measurements of all species were taken from 10 mature individuals using suitable herbarium specimens. In addition, morphological analyzes of the new species were carried out on 15 specimens from the population at Beyreli village location and 10 specimens from the population at Ermenek location as well as on the living plants during the field studies performed at the aforementioned populations of two locations (i.e., Beyreli village & Ermenek, see Figure 4). Following the publication of current paper, isotype specimens of F. pisidica will be submitted to the additional herbaria in Istanbul (NGBB), Turkey and Edinburgh (E), UK.

Anatomical research material was dried so they were preserved in 70% ethanol. In this study at least 30 mature fruits of F. pisidica were analyzed. All transverse sections were cut by hand from the middle of the mericarps using a razor blade. Samples were examined in Sartur reagent (a compound reagent of Sudan III, lactic acid, aniline, iodine, potassium iodide, water, and alcohol) [34]. Photographs were taken with iPhone X. Measurements of mericarps were made by program ImageJ©. The fruit morphology and anatomy were described by using the terms of Botanical Latin [35], and Kızılarslan and Akalın [36].

5. Conclusions

Ferula pisidica from the ancient Pisidia province of Anatolia was described as a new species. The genus Ferula has some unusual Turkish and Iranian species that their phylogeny is not adequate to provide a decisive taxonomical information. The number of chromosome was found to be 2n = 22 in all investigated Turkish Ferula species, in addition, palynologic data was not used as a distinctive character for Apiaceae family. Therefore, sesquiterpenoid metabolite data of F. pisidica were used to corroborate the traditional taxonomical analyses. In addition to our extensive secondary metabolite knowledge on the Turkish Ferula species [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,34], distinctive internal and external morphological features, as well as chemical differences between the closely allied species provide sufficient evidence for the recognition of F. pisidica as a new species.

Acknowledgments

We thank Sezin Anıl for her help during the collection of plant material.

Author Contributions

The following statements should be used “Conceptualization, E.A. and M.M.; methodology, E.A.; software, H.O.T. and B.O.; validation, E.A., M.M. and H.O.T., B.O.; resources, E.A. and M.M.; writing—original draft preparation, E.A., M.M., H.O.T. and B.O.; writing—review and editing, M.M., H.O.T. and B.O.; visualization, H.O.T. and B.O.; supervision, E.A. and M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Hickey M., King C. Common Families of Flowering Plants. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pimenov M.G., Leonov M.V. The Genera of the Umbelliferae. Royal Botanic Gardens; London, UK: 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Korovin E.P. Generis Ferula (Tourn.) L. Monographia illustrate. Academiae Scientiarum URSS; Tashkent, Uzbekistan: 1947. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Boissier E. Ferula. In: Boissier E., editor. Flora Orientalis. H. Georg; Geneva, Switzerland: 1872. pp. 819–1090. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Safina L.K., Pimenov M.G. Carpology of the species of type subgenus of the Ferula and some problems of their systematics. Feddes Reper. 1990;101:135–152. doi: 10.1002/fedr.19901010305. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pimenov M.G., Terekhin A.T., Devyatkova G.N., Baranova Y.V. Klassifikatsiya vidov roda Ferula L. (Umbelliferae) s pomoschchiyu yerakhicheskogo klaster-analiza. Vopr Kibern. 1978;47:98–113. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Peşmen H. Ferula L. In: Davis P.H., editor. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Volume 4. Edinburg University Press; Edinburg, TX, USA: 1972. pp. 440–453. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Duman H., Sağıroğlu M. A new species of Ferula (Apiaceae) from South Anatolia, Turkey. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2005;147:357–361. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2005.00360.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sağıroğlu M., Duman H. Ferula parva Freyn and Bornm. (Apiaceae): A contribution to an enigmatic species from Turkey. Turk. J. Bot. 2006;30:399–404. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sağıroğlu M., Duman H. Ferula mervynii (Apiaceae), a distinct new species from North East Anatolia, Turkey. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2007;153:357–362. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2007.00615.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sağıroğlu M., Duman H. Ferula brevipedicellata and F. duranii (Apiaceae), two new species from Anatolia, Turkey. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 2010;47:293–300. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Panahi M., Banasiak Ł., Piwczyński M., Puchałka R., Oskolski A.A., Spalik K. Phylogenetic relationships among Dorema, Ferula and Leutea (Apiaceae: Scandiceae: Ferulinae) inferred from nrDNA ITS and cpDNA noncoding sequences. Taxon. 2015;64:770–783. doi: 10.12705/644.8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yaqoob U., NawchooI A. Distribution and taxonomy of Ferula L.: A review. Res. Rev. J. Bot. 2016;5:15–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kurzyna-Młynik R., Oskolski A.A., Downie S.R., Kopacz R., Wojewódzka A., Spalik K. Phylogenetic position of the genus Ferula (Apiaceae) and its placement in tribe Scandiceae as inferred from nrDNA ITS sequence variation. Plant Syst. Evol. 2008;274:47. doi: 10.1007/s00606-008-0022-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Elibol Z., Menemen Y., Sağıroğlu M., Duman H. A molecular phylogenetic study on some Turkish Ferula L. (Apiaceae) species using nrDNA ITS sequences. Pak. J. Bot. 2012;44:589–594. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Downie S.R., Watson M.F., Spalik K., Katz-Downie D.S. Molecular systematics of Old World Apioideae (Apiaceae): Relationships among some members of tribe Peucedaneae sensu lato, the placement of several island endemic species, and resolution within the apioid superclade. Can. J. Bot. 2000;78:506–528. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Panahi M., Banasiak Ł., Marcin P., Puchałka R., Kanani M.R., Oskolskı A.A., Modnicki D., Mıłobędzka A., Spalik K. Taxonomy of the traditional medicinal plant genus Ferula(Apiaceae) is confounded by incongruence between nuclear rDNA and plastid DNA. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2018;188:173–189. doi: 10.1093/botlinnean/boy055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Piwczyński M., Wyborska D., Golbiewska J., Puchalka R. Phylogenetic positions of seven poorly known species of Ferula (Apiaceae) with remarks on the phylogenetic utility of the plastid trnH-psbA, trnS-trnG, and atpB-rbcL intergenic spacers. Syst. Biodivers. 2018;16:428–440. doi: 10.1080/14772000.2018.1442374. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ajani Y., Ajani A., Cordes J.M., Watson M.F., Downie S.R. Phylogenetic analysis of nrDNA ITS sequences reveals relationships within five groups of Iranian Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae. Taxon. 2008;57:383–401. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sağıroğlu M., Duman H. Rediscovery of Ferula anatolica and Ferula drudeana (Apiaceae) from Turkey. Biol. Divers. Conserv. 2011;4:191–197. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ubaid Y., Irshad A.N., Aijaz H.G. Occurrence of the two cytotypes of Ferula jaeschkeana Vatke in Kashmir Himalaya. Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett. 2018;41:333–336. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Miski M., Mabry T.J. Daucane esters from Ferula communis subsp. communis. Phytochemistry. 1985;24:1735–1741. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)82543-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Miski M., Mabry T.J. Fercolide, A type of sesquiterpene lactone from Ferula communis subsp. communis and the correct structure of vaginatin. Phytochemistry. 1986;25:1673–1675. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Miski M., Jakupovic J. Cyclic farnesyl-coumarin and farnesyl-chromone derivatives from Ferula communis subsp. communis. Phytochemistry. 1990;29:1995–1998. doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(90)85054-J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Miski M., Ulubelen A., Mabry T.J., Watson W.H., Vickovic I., Holub M. A new sesquiterpene ester from Ferula tingitana. Tetrahedron. 1984;24:5197–5201. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4020(01)91270-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Miski M., Ulubelen A., Lee E., Mabry T.J. Sesquiterpene-coumarin Ethers of Ferula tingitana. J. Nat. Prod. 1985;48:326–327. doi: 10.1021/np50038a024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Miski M., Ulubelen A., Mabry T.J. Six sesquiterpene alcohol esters from Ferula elaeochytris. Phytochemistry. 1983;22:2231–2233. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)80153-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Miski M., Mabry T.J., Saya Ö. New daucane and germacrene esters from Ferula orientalis var. orientalis. J. Nat. Prod. 1987;50:829–834. doi: 10.1021/np50053a009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Miski M., Jakupovic J. Daucane esters from Ferula rigidula. Phytochemistry. 1990;29:173–178. doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(90)89032-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Miski M., Mabry T.J., Saya Ö. Apiene esters from Ferula hausknechtii. Phytochemistry. 1987;26:1733–1737. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)82278-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Alkhatib R., Hennebelle T., Joha S., Roumy V., Güzel Y., Biabiany M., Idziorek T., Preudhomme C., Quesnel B., Sahpaz S., et al. Humulane and germacrene sesquiterpenes from Ferula lycia. Phytochemistry. 2010;73:780–783. doi: 10.1021/np900827a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. [(accessed on 16 June 2019)]; Version 14. Available online: http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf.
  • 33.Miski M., Mabry T.J. New daucane esters from Ferula tingitana. J. Nat. Prod. 1986;49:657–660. doi: 10.1021/np50046a016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Çelebioglu S., Baytop T. Bitkisel tozların tetkiki için yeni bir reaktif. Farmakolog. 1949;19:301. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Stearn W.T. Botanical Latin. Timber Press; Portland, OR, USA: 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kızılarslan-Hançer C., Akalın-Uruşak E. Term of “vitta” and their localization in fruit anatomy of Apiaceae Family. Eurasscience J. 2017;5:19–24. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plants are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES