Skip to main content
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 Jul 13;50(3):587–595. doi: 10.1007/s11239-020-02228-y

COVID-19 and ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-summary of the literature

Ying-Kiat Tan 1, Claire Goh 1, Aloysius S T Leow 2, Paul A Tambyah 1,3, Alicia Ang 3, Eng-Soo Yap 4,5, Tian-Ming Tu 6, Vijay K Sharma 1,2, Leonard L L Yeo 1,2,, Bernard P L Chan 2, Benjamin Y Q Tan 1,2
PMCID: PMC7358286  PMID: 32661757

Abstract

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a life-threatening complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Increasing reports suggest an association between COVID-19 and AIS, although the underlying mechanism remains uncertain. We performed a systematic review to characterize the clinical characteristics, neuroimaging findings, and outcomes of AIS in COVID-19 patients. A literature search was performed in PubMed and Embase using a suitable keyword search strategy from 1st December 2019 to 29th May 2020. All studies reporting AIS occurrence in COVID-19 patients were included. A total of 39 studies comprising 135 patients were studied. The pooled incidence of AIS in COVID-19 patients from observational studies was 1.2% (54/4466) with a mean age of 63.4 ± 13.1 years. The mean duration of AIS from COVID-19 symptoms onset was 10 ± 8 days, and the mean NIHSS score was 19 ± 8. Laboratory investigations revealed an elevated mean d-dimer (9.2 ± 14.8 mg/L) and fibrinogen (5.8 ± 2.0 g/L). Antiphospholipid antibodies were detected in a significant number of cases. The majority of AIS neuroimaging patterns observed was large vessel thrombosis, embolism or stenosis (62.1%, 64/103), followed by multiple vascular territory (26.2%, 27/103). A high mortality rate was reported (38.0%, 49/129). We report the pooled incidence of AIS in COVID-19 patients to be 1.2%, with a high mortality rate. Elevated d-dimer, fibrinogen and the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies appear to be prominent in COVID-19 patients with concomitant AIS, but further mechanistic studies are required to elucidate their role in pathogenesis.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s11239-020-02228-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Keywords: Antiphospholipid antibodies, COVID-19, Hypercoagulable, Ischemic stroke, Thrombosis

Highlights

  • Incidence of acute ischemic stroke in COVID-19 patients ranges from 0.9% to 2.7%

  • Stroke severity in COVID-19 patients are typically at least moderate (NIHSS score 19 ± 8), with a high prevalence (40.9%) of large vessel occlusion

  • Notable number of cases tested positive for antiphospholipid antibodies

  • A high mortality rate (38.0%) was reported

Introduction

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a life-threatening complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection [1]. While much is still unknown about the novel coronavirus, the link between COVID-19 and ischemic stroke has been increasingly documented in recent literature and mass media, be it in young COVID-19 patients [2] or patients without pre-existing cardiovascular risk factors or significant comorbidities [3]. Till date, the true incidence of AIS in COVID-19 patients remains unclear. In a study of 214 patients in Wuhan, the initial epicenter of the pandemic, the incidence of stroke was 2.34% [4]. However, in a more recent study conducted in New York, the incidence was relatively lower at 0.9% [5]. Furthermore, the underlying stroke mechanism of COVID-19 remains debatable. It has been proposed that COVID-19 may induce a prothrombotic state, as supported by the elevated levels of factor VIII, fibrinogen, and d-dimer [6, 7]. Interestingly, various case series and reports also suggest a preponderance of large vessel occlusion (LVO) AIS [2].

Given the rapidly rising number of COVID-19 infections globally and AIS complications, it is important to have a more in-depth understanding of their association. Thus far, the published literature has been limited to case reports, case series and observational cohort studies. We performed a systematic review and meta-summary of the literature to evaluate patient demographics, clinical and stroke characteristics, prothrombotic workup, neuroimaging findings, treatment and outcomes of COVID-19 patients who have suffered an AIS.

Methods

Literature search strategy

We conducted the systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was performed on PubMed and Embase from 1st December 2019, before the first case of COVID-19 was reported, to 29th May 2020 [1]. The search strategy consisted of different combinations of the following search terms: COVID, Coronavirus, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, CoV, SARS-CoV-2, stroke, AIS, neurologic*, acute cerebrovascular*, transient ischemic attack, infarct, coagulopathy, pro-thrombotic, hypercoagulable, thrombus and clot. The search was performed by two independent reviewers (YKT & CG). During study screening for relevance, any disagreement was resolved by consensus with a senior author (BT). Studies reporting incidences of stroke in patients positive for COVID-19 were identified separately. The reference lists of these articles were also screened, and hand searched to identify further relevant studies.

Study and cohort selection

All studies (case reports, case series and observational cohort studies) that reported AIS in COVID-19 patients were included during the initial search. We subsequently excluded all studies that reported only hemorrhagic stroke, cerebral venous thrombosis and those without an English translation.

Data extraction

Relevant quantitative data were extracted by two authors (YKT & CG) in the form of absolute frequencies of events or absolute numbers when appropriate. Where available, the data included incidence rate, individual case data: patient demographics (age, gender), country of study origin, comorbidities, COVID-19 symptoms, duration of stroke from symptom onset, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), presence of LVO, patterns of stroke on neuroimaging, relevant biological markers (white cell count, absolute lymphocyte count, platelets, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (PTT), c-reactive protein (CRP), d-dimer, fibrinogen, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and ferritin), treatment (acute recanalisation and antithrombotic therapy) and early outcomes (hemorrhagic transformation and mortality). Neuroimaging data reported in text or image format was reviewed by two stroke neurologists (BT & LL) and classified as one of these patterns: (1) large vessel thrombosis or embolism or stenosis; (2) multiple vascular territory; (3) small vessel; (4) others.

Risk of bias assessment

The quality of the included case reports and case series was assessed using the guidelines recommended by the Johanna Briggs Institute, while the quality of the included observational cohort studies was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. For case series, each study was assessed if there was a clear inclusion criterion, measured the condition in a reliable way, had a valid method to identify the condition, had consecutive or complete inclusion and reported patient demographics, clinical information, and outcomes. For case reports, each study was assessed if the following was well described: patient demographics, medical history, clinical conditions, diagnostic tests, treatment, post-treatment clinical condition, adverse events and takeaway lessons. For observational cohort studies, each study was assessed on their selection, comparability (if applicable) and outcome.

Statistical analysis

We present the numeric variables as mean and SD. Categorical variables are presented as percentages. Studies that reported the incidence of ischemic stroke among COVID-19 patients were pooled to generate a pooled incidence table. Individual case data were separately pooled with patient demographics, COVID-19 symptoms, stroke characteristics, treatment, and clinical outcomes presented. All data analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics 25.0 software.

Results

Study selection and grading

The electronic search strategy yielded 4965 studies, of which 2644 studies were removed as duplicates or not meeting criteria A further 2200 studies were excluded after an initial screen of title and abstract as they did not specifically report incidence or cases of stroke in COVID-19 patients. Lastly, 82 articles were excluded after full text review. Finally, 39 eligible studies were included in our systematic review and meta-summary. The study identification and selection process are reflected in Fig. 1 [15, 738].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

PRISMA flowchart for study selection

Based on guidelines provided by the Joanna Briggs Institute, all case series studies, and the majority of case reports were assessed to be of low risk of bias. A few case reports were assessed to be moderately biased given lack of reporting completeness (Supplementary Table 1). In accordance with the Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment scale, most observational cohort studies were assessed to be of low risk of bias.

Incidence of AIS

Five observational cohort studies reported varying incidences of AIS among COVID-19 patients ranging from 0.9% to 2.7% (Table 1). Across the five studies, there were a total of 4466 COVID-19 patients, of which AIS was reported in 54 patients, yielding an overall pooled incidence of AIS as 1.2%. All five studies were conducted in different countries (France, Netherlands, Italy, China, and the United States (US)) with varying ethnic demographics. Two studies had patient cohorts specifically consisting of patients with severe COVID-19 infection, while three included all hospitalized patients with laboratory proven COVID-19 infection.

Table 1.

Pooled Incidence of acute ischemic stroke in COVID-19 patients

Study Country Patient population Total number of COVID patients Total number of COVID patients with stroke Incidence (%)
Helms et al. [8] France Severe SARS-CoV-2 infection 150 3 2.0
Klok et al. [9] Netherlands Severe SARS-CoV-2 infection 184 5 2.7
Lodigiani et al. [10] Italy Laboratory proven COVID-19, hospitalised 362 9 2.5
Mao et al. [4] China Laboratory proven COVID-19, hospitalised 214 5 2.3
Yaghi et al. [5] United States Laboratory proven COVID-19, hospitalised 3556 32 0.9
Pooled 4466 54 1.2

Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients with AIS

Overall, we report a total of 135 COVID-19 patients with AIS. Their demographics, COVID-19 symptoms, blood investigations and stroke characteristics are presented in Table 2. The mean age was 63.4 ± 13.1 years and the majority were male patients (62.3%, 81/130). Majority of the COVID-19 related AIS patients were reported from US (57.0%, 77/135) and China (13.3%, 18/135). Common co-morbidities included hypertension (64.5%, 78/121), diabetes mellitus (42.6%, 52/122) and hyperlipidemia (32.0%, 33/103).

Table 2.

Characteristics of COVID-19 patients with acute ischemic stroke

Variable Valid N Values
Age (years) 135 63.4 ± 13.1
Male gender 130 81 (62.3)
Country of study origin 135
 United States 77 (57.0)
 Italy 14 (10.4)
 France 13 (9.6)
 United Kingdoms 6 (4.4)
 Spain 2 (1.5)
 Turkey 4 (3.0)
 China 18 (13.3)
 Philippines 1 (0.7)
Co-morbidities
 Diabetes mellitus 122 52 (42.6)
 Hypertension 121 78 (64.5)
 Hyperlipidemia 103 33 (32.0)
 Atrial fibrillation 94 17 (18.1)
 Previous strokes 36 8 (22.2)
 Smoking 45 7 (15.6)
COVID-19 symptoms
 Fever 102 65 (63.7)
 Acute respiratory symptomsa 96 73 (76.0)
 Dyspnea 58 34 (58.6)
Duration of stroke from symptom onset (days) 72 10 ± 8
NIHSS 40 19 ± 8
Presence of LVO 115 47 (40.9)
 Simultaneous LVO of different territories 47 7 (14.9)
Laboratory investigations
 TW (× 109/L;) 46 10.2 ± 5.0
 Absolute lymphocyte count (× 109/L) 37 0.88 ± 0.46
 Platelets (× 109/L) 45 244.3 ± 123.9
 PT (s) 22 14.9 ± 4.9
 PTT (s) 19 34.1 ± 7.4
 CRP (mg/L) 80 105.6 ± 91.1
 d-dimer (mg/L) 98 9.2 ± 14.8
 Fibrinogen (g/L) 23 5.8 ± 2.0
 LDH (U/L) 18 531.6 ± 228.5
 Ferritin (μg/L) 38 1014.4 ± 1216.2
Stroke treatment
 Intravenous thrombolysis 104 26 (25.0)
 Endovascular thrombectomy 104 35 (33.7)
 Antiplatelet therapy 80 40 (50.0)
 Anticoagulation 77 56 (72.7)
Outcomes
 Hemorrhagic transformation 29 3 (10.3)
 Mortality 129 49 (38.0)

ARI acute respiratory infection, COVID-19 coronavirus disease 2019, LVO large vessel occlusion, NIHSS National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale

aAcute respiratory symptoms include cough, rhinorrhea, sore throat, myalgia

The majority of patients manifested typical COVID-19 symptoms, namely fever (63.7%, 65/102), acute respiratory symptoms (76.0%, 73/96) and dyspnea (58.6%, 34/58). The mean duration of AIS from COVID-19 symptoms onset was 10 ± 8 days. Laboratory investigations showed elevated mean d-dimer (9.2 ± 14.8 mg/L) and fibrinogen levels (5.8 ± 2.0 g/L).

AIS severity and neuroimaging features

The mean NIHSS score was 19 ± 8, consistent with a LVO described in a significant number of AIS patients with COVID-19 (40.9%, 47/115). Simultaneous multiple LVO of different vascular territories was reported in 14.9% of LVO AIS patients (7/47).

Based on available neuroimaging data of 103 cases, the majority of AIS patterns was large vessel thrombosis, embolism or stenosis pattern (62.1%, 64/103), followed by multiple vascular territory (26.2%, 27/103) (Supplementary Table 2). Small vessel pattern was infrequently reported on imaging (8.7%, 9/103). There was 1 case of ophthalmic artery occlusion and 2 cases of cerebellar infarcts reported.

Significance of antiphospholipid antibodies

Information on antiphospholipid antibodies or lupus anticoagulant status was available in only 16 AIS cases (Table 3). Amongst these, 5 out of the 12 patients (41.7%) tested for lupus anticoagulant were positive. For anti-cardiolipin antibodies, 20% (2/10) tested positive for IgM and 42.9% (3/7) tested positive for IgA. No patient (0/9) tested positive for IgG anti-cardiolipin antibodies. In addition, the study by Fara et al. [14] also reported one unspecified patient with mildly elevated anti-cardiolipin antibodies. For anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies: 10% (1/10) of those tested were positive for IgM, 38.5% (5/13) tested positive for IgG, and 42.9% (3/7) tested positive for IgA.

Table 3.

Detection of Antiphospholipid Antibodies in concomitant AIS and COVID-19 patients

Study Patient no LAC Anti-cardiolipin Ab Anti-B2-glycoprotein 1 Ab Neuroimaging findings
IgM IgG IgA IgM IgG IgA
Viguier et al. [3] 1 Left CCA thrombus
Beyrouti et al. [12] 2a  +   +  -  +   +  Left vertebral artery occlusion and PICA territory infarct
3  +  Left cerebellar and right parieto-occipital infarcts
4 Left PCA occlusion and infarct
5  +  Right striatocapsular infarct
6  +  Right M2 occlusion and insula infarct
7  +  Basilar thrombus and bilateral posterior circulation infarcts
Deliwala et al. [18] 8 Right MCA infarct
Dumitrascu et al. [34] 9 Ophthalmic artery occlusion
Goldberg et al. [19] 10  +  Right MCA and bilateral ACA infarcts
Gunasekaran et al. [11] 11 Right MCA infarct
Zayet et al. [35] 12  +  Multiple vascular territory embolic pattern
13 Multiple vascular territory embolic pattern
Zhang et al. [13] 14  +   +   +  Multiple vascular territory embolic pattern
15  +   +   +  Multiple vascular territory embolic pattern
16  +   +   +  Multiple vascular territory embolic pattern

aStudy by Beyrouti et al. [12] had one patient (patient 2) who presented with medium titre values for Anti-cardiolipin Ab IgM, and low titre values for Anti-B2-glycoprotein 1 Ab IgM and IgG

ACA anterior cerebral artery, CCA common carotid artery, MCA middle cerebral artery, PCA posterior cerebral artery, PICA posterior inferior cerebellar artery

AIS treatment and outcomes

Availability of details regarding treatment varied between the different acute recanalisation therapy and antithrombotic options. For studies that reported details of treatment: 25.0% (26/104) received intravenous thrombolysis, 33.7% (35/104) received endovascular thrombectomy, 50% (40/80) received antiplatelet therapy and 72.7% (56/77) received anticoagulation treatment. Patient outcomes on hemorrhagic transformation were available in only 29 cases, of which 3 (10.3%) developing this complication. Out of the 129 patients with information on mortality, 49 (38.0%) had demised at the time that the respective reports were published.

Discussion

Our study provides a comprehensive systematic review and meta-summary of the clinical manifestations, investigations, and outcomes of COVID-19 patients with AIS. The key findings of this study are: (1) incidence of AIS in COVID-19 patients ranges from 0.9% to 2.7%; (2) AIS severity in COVID-19 patients are typically at least moderate (NIHSS score 19 ± 8), with a high prevalence (40.9%) of LVO; (3) a notable number of cases tested positive for antiphospholipid antibodies and (4) a high mortality rate (38.0%) was reported.

Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, few observational studies have reported the incidence of AIS, with a pooled incidence of 1.2% (range 0.9–2.7%) [4, 5, 810]. The variation in incidence may be attributed to the different patient populations in which AIS outcomes were studied, for instance a relatively higher incidence was observed in studies comprising severe COVID-19 infection cases [8, 9] compared to those that included all laboratory proven hospitalized COVID-19 patients [5]. This is congruent with existing studies that reported an increased prevalence of neurological disorders in severe COVID-19 infection [4, 8], possibly mediated by the effects of cytokine storm and other complications associated with critical illness. The role of different patient demographics and ethnicities in influencing the incidence of AIS also remains uncertain. Certain countries may also be limited by testing capabilities resulting in under-reporting of COVID-19 cases and hence an overestimation of AIS incidence [39].

In a small but significant proportion of AIS patients, typical symptoms of COVID-19 were not reported on presentation (24.0% (23/96) had no acute respiratory symptoms), and respiratory COVID-19 infection was picked up incidentally on chest radiograph or computed tomography scan before testing for the virus was performed. This prompts the question as to the need for routine COVID-19 screening of AIS patients who are asymptomatic for the infection especially when the stroke mechanism is unclear or in the absence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. In addition, it is especially difficult to detect signs of ischemic stroke in critically ill COVID-19 patients who are often intubated and heavily sedated, masking their clinical features [5]. Furthermore, social isolation policies and reluctance to go to the hospital may also contribute to under-reporting of minor strokes in asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 patients [40]. Owing to these reasons, we strongly feel that determining the true incidence of AIS in COVID-19 patients would be extremely challenging.

Although there have been some reports of young strokes in COVID-19 patients [2, 11, 41], we found that the mean age of COVID-19 patients with AIS was 63.4 ± 13.1 years, with cardiovascular risk factors being commonly seen. Studies have reported conflicting data on the timing of thromboembolic complications in COVID-19 patients [10, 12]. In this systematic review, the mean duration of AIS from onset of COVID-19 symptoms was 10 ± 8 days, suggestive of a delayed presentation. This is in agreement with the current postulations that patients with severe COVID-19 infection may develop an early hyperinflammatory state from cytokine storm followed by a prothrombotic state that is frequently complicated by both venous and arterial thromboembolism [41, 42]. However, clinicians should be wary that thrombotic sequelae such as stroke may be seen in both early and late phases of the infection [10, 12, 42, 43]. Elevated biomarkers such as d-dimer, fibrinogen, factor VIII and von Willebrand factor provide further evidence of a prothrombotic state [6, 14, 44, 45].

Antiphospholipid antibodies, which refer to any or all of the antibodies detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for anti-β2-glycoprotein I or anticardiolipin antibodies, IgG or IgM serotypes and the lupus-anticoagulant assays [46], were frequently reported in COVID-19 AIS patients. Anti-phospholipid antibodies increase the risk of thrombosis by inducing cellular activation, inhibiting natural anticoagulant and fibrinolytic systems, and activating the complement system [46]. While it is reported that antiphospholipid antibodies are commonly found in COVID-19 infections, the true prevalence of antiphospholipid-antibody positivity in the general population is not known and has also been detected in healthy individuals [47]. Even among patients with stroke who are younger than 50 years of age, 17% were found to have antiphospholipid antibodies [47]. Furthermore, non-criteria antiphospholipid subtypes had been tested in COVID-19 studies, such as IgA anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies which there is insufficient evidence of their clinical relevance [48]. Hence, the significance of antiphospholipid antibodies in the pathogenesis of AIS in COVID-19 patient remains uncertain and it may be worthwhile for future studies to repeat and trend these serological markers after the acute thrombotic setting.

COVID-19 patients appear to manifest with moderate to severe AIS, with a high prevalence of LVO. Importantly, most of these AIS demonstrated a large vessel thrombosis, embolism, stenosis or multiple vascular territory pattern on imaging, and a much lower incidence of small vessel stroke, deviating from traditional trends of AIS subtypes [49]. The presence of simultaneous multiple LVO of different vascular territories (14.9%, 7/47) was also greater than its presumed prevalence in the current literature of patients receiving thrombectomy, consistent with the postulated theory of a COVID-19 induced prothrombotic state [50]. Furthermore, AIS in COVID-19 patients suffer from worse outcomes in the form of higher hemorrhagic transformation and all-cause mortality [51]. Consistent findings were reported in a study that compared the stroke characteristics of COVID-19 positive patients with COVID-19 negative patients and historical controls. In their comparative analysis, it was observed that patients with concomitant COVID-19 suffered more severe strokes, with a higher NIHSS score, greater proportion of large vessel occlusion and higher in-hospital mortality [5]. However, we were unable to directly compare the AIS rate in matched controls at the present setting given the lack of available literature. Future studies should compare the stroke risk in an appropriately matched cohort of patients with non-COVID-19 infections.

Owing to the observations of a prothrombotic state and higher mortality in AIS patients with COVID-19 infection, recommendations have been made for the use of prophylactic or therapeutic anticoagulation [42, 52]. Nevertheless, it is difficult to establish a direct causal relationship between COVID-19 and AIS, especially in the presence of multiple cardiovascular risk factors and other stroke mechanisms, such as large artery atherosclerosis or cardioembolism due to atrial fibrillation, found in many COVID-19 patients [15].

Limitations

We acknowledge that this systematic review has several limitations. Firstly, the majority of studies included are either case series or case reports, with only a few being observational cohort studies. Accordingly, many of these studies are considered relatively lower in quality with publication and reporting bias. While observational cohorts with negligible incidence of COVID-19 related AIS may not have been reported, cases with severe stroke, LVO and dramatic neuroimaging findings could have been reported more frequently. Secondly, significant heterogeneity is expected when most of the publications are case reports or series. In addition, not all the studies included in this systematic review reported every relevant variable. These factors limit our ability to generalize the characteristics of COVID-19 related AIS. Finally, language restrictions may have affected the identification and inclusion of relevant cases. This was especially relevant as many publications related to COVID-19 related AIS may have been published in their regional language (especially Chinese, Italian, and Spanish). Perhaps, there is an urgent need to establish an international registry of COVID-19 patients manifesting with AIS, with meticulous reporting of clinical characteristics, imaging findings, treatment, and outcomes in a standardized manner. This will help further elucidate the relationship between COVID-19 and AIS and serve as a platform to provide recommendations and guidelines for the workup, treatment, and follow-up of these patients.

Conclusion

We report the pooled incidence of AIS in COVID-19 patients to be 1.2%, with a high mortality rate. Elevated d-dimer, fibrinogen and the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies appear to be prominent in COVID-19 patients with concomitant ischemic stroke, but further mechanistic studies are required to elucidate their role in the pathogenesis of AIS.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Funding

None.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflict of interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Ying-Kiat Tan and Claire Goh are co-first authors.

References

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES