Skip to main content
Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association logoLink to Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association
. 2020;131:356–368.

MOLECULAR MECHANISMS CONTRIBUTING TO FUZZY EPIDEMICS CAUSED BY GROUP A STREPTOCOCCUS, A FLESH-EATING HUMAN BACTERIAL PATHOGEN

JAMES M MUSSER 1,
PMCID: PMC7358509  PMID: 32675873

Abstract

Epidemics caused by microbial pathogens are inherently interesting because they can kill large numbers of our brethren, cause social upheaval, and alter history. Microbial epidemics will likely continue to occur at unpredictable times and result in poorly predictable consequences. Over a 30-year period, we have used the human bacterial pathogen group A streptococcus (also known as Streptococcus pyogenes) as a model organism to gain understanding of the molecular mechanisms contributing to epidemics caused by this pathogen and attendant virulence mechanisms. These epidemics have affected tens of millions of individuals worldwide and were largely unrecognized until revealed by full-genome sequence data from many thousands of isolates from intercontinental sources. Molecular genetic strategies, coupled with extensive use of relevant animal infection models, have delineated precise evolutionary genetic changes that contribute to pathogen clone emergence and successful dissemination among humans. Here, we summarize a few key findings from these studies.

INTRODUCTION

For millennia, humans have fretted about microbial epidemics because of the death and mayhem they cause. It is well known that epidemics have affected the course of history by decimating human and domesticated animal populations and detrimentally altering crop yields. Consequently, there is considerable interest in understanding the molecular events that contribute to pathogen emergence and the ability to cause geographically widespread epidemic or pandemic disease. Due to space constraints, we will focus on bacterial pathogens and not discuss viral or eukaryotic pathogens.

The great majority of pathogenic bacterial species are characterized by very abundant diversity in gene content and allelic variation (1-4). The genetic diversity found in bacterial pathogens is far greater than that found in higher eukaryotic species such as Homo sapiens. This substantial genetic diversity commonly results in differences in molecular interactions between pathogen and host, which contributes to changes in disease frequency and character, including severity. Thus, understanding the contribution an infecting bacterial pathogen makes to a pathogen-host interaction outcome requires detailed knowledge of gene content, allelic variation, and differences in gene transcriptome profile.

Historically, many techniques were used to detect diversity among bacterial isolates for studying the relationship between strain genotype and disease phenotype (1,2). Commonly used techniques included bacteriophage typing, antigen typing, resistotyping, and metabolic profiling, but these phenotypic techniques were limited because many had restricted resolving power and the phenotype being assessed generally could not be equated with precise genetic differences between strains (1,2). Subsequently, a few population geneticists began to apply the techniques and theory of contemporary population genetics to assess the degree of variation present in natural populations of bacteria (1,2,5,6). Early analyses focused on Escherichia coli and employed techniques such as multilocus enzyme electrophoresis, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and multilocus sequence typing (5-8). Although these techniques represented significant advances at the time, they were all limited because they assessed variation at only a relatively small number of chromosomal loci and, thus, substantially underestimated the magnitude of genetic diversity among isolates.

In approximately the last 15 years, the confluence of high-throughput, low-cost genome sequencing has revolutionized the study of bacterial population genetics (now commonly called population genomics) and permitted very large samples of strains to be interrogated at the full-genome level, including at the individual nucleotide (9-17). This has opened the door to several types of analyses, including the molecular events contributing to epidemics caused by many different bacterial pathogens, including Streptococcus pyogenes [group A streptococcus (GAS), see below]. These are termed “fuzzy epidemics” because they were not recognized and shown to be caused by recently evolved clonal progeny, arising from a common ancestor until full-genome sequence data were available, to unambiguously demonstrate shared recent common ancestry.

GAS IS A NUMERICALLY IMPORTANT HUMAN PATHOGEN

GAS is a gram-positive, human-specific pathogen that is responsible for greater than 700 million infections annually (18,19). This organism causes unusually diverse infections including pharyngitis and/or tonsillitis, skin infections such as impetigo and erysipelas, acute rheumatic fever (ARF), scarlet fever, poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis, sepsis, puerperal sepsis (commonly referred to as childbed fever), toxic shock syndrome, meningitis, and necrotizing fasciitis (18-20). Despite a century of study, for reasons that remain obscure, poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis, ARF, and subsequent rheumatic heart disease (RHD) occur in a subset of individuals as post-infection sequelae. Although antibiotic treatment has largely eliminated ARF and RHD in the United States and Europe, these diseases remain a very substantial public health problem globally, especially in certain areas of Africa and Oceania (18,19). Unfortunately, there is no licensed vaccine against GAS infection, although substantial effort has been directed toward this goal in the last 40 years and some important progress has been made (21,22). The direct and indirect costs of human GAS infections are estimated to be billions of dollars annually.

Historically, GAS has been subtyped based on serologic variation in the aminoterminal part of a bacterial cell surface-anchored protein known as M protein, a highly polymorphic protein that is a major virulence factor since it is anti-phagocytic (20,23). M protein serotyping has been largely replaced by sequencing of the hypervariable part of the emm gene encoding M protein. More than 240 emm types are now recognized, and this substantial allelic variation has proven useful for characterizing strains in epidemiologic studies. Importantly, no single emm type is solely responsible for any one type of GAS infection; however, strains expressing particular M serotypes have been repeatedly and nonrandomly associated with specific diseases over many decades of study (20,24). For example, emm1 and emm3 strains are leading causes of severe invasive infections in many parts of the United States and other Western countries, emm18 strains have been repeatedly associated with rheumatic fever outbreaks in the United States, and emm28 strains have been nonrandomly associated with cases of puerperal sepsis and neonatal infections (24-33). As a consequence of these epidemiologic associations, the concept arose that there are distinct molecular underpinnings to the nonrandom associations of emm type and disease phenotype. This thinking has resulted in substantial genome sequencing and other analyses strategies designed to identify molecular underpinnings responsible for the disease associations, including epidemics. Some important findings related to several distinct GAS emm types will be discussed below.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

GAS as a Useful Model Pathogen for Studying Epidemics

GAS is a useful model pathogen for studying human epidemic disease at the full-genome level for several reasons. First, the ability of GAS to cause human epidemics has been appreciated for more than a century. Second, the organism has a relatively small genome size, with the genome of most strains in the range of only 1.8 to 1.9 Mb (9,12-16,32). This is approximately half the size of many other common bacterial pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus and E. coli, only about one-fifth the size of many fungal pathogens, and much smaller (one-tenth the size) than many other eukaryotic pathogens such as Plasmodium species. Third, GAS severe invasive infections are reportable in many countries, and large culture collections spanning decades exist, most notably in the Nordic countries. Some of these culture collections have linked patient metadata available, which greatly assists and enriches analysis of strain genotype-patient phenotype relationships. Fourth, the organism can be readily manipulated genetically, which means isogenic mutant strains can be precisely constructed and used to test focused mechanistic hypotheses emerging from population genomic studies. Similarly, relevant animal models of many types of GAS infections exist, and these can be exploited to test hypotheses bearing on the molecular genetic basis of many infection types, including pharyngitis, necrotizing myositis, female genital tract interactions, and others (12-14,22,35-37). Finally, as noted previously, GAS is a human-specific pathogen, which means molecular events linked to clone emergence and epidemics occur only in the human host (i.e., not in a nonhuman host or elsewhere in the environment).

Serotype M1 Epidemic Disease

Type emm1 GAS is a common cause of pharyngitis and severe invasive infections in the United States, Canada, western European countries, and elsewhere. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, type emm1 GAS was reported to be responsible for increased disease frequency and severity in many of these countries (34,38-40). The infection resurgence captured public attention in part because of the death of the Muppet creator, Jim Henson, due to severe emm1 disease. Severe GAS infections also occurred in well-known public figures in other countries such as Canada (41). Some early data suggested that the increase in disease frequency and severity was due to emergence of a new emm1 clone (34,38-40,42).

In an effort to gain new understanding of the molecular events contributing to the rapid and recent upsurge in emm1 infections, we assembled a large international collection of 3,615 emm1 strains and sequenced the genomes of all of them (12). These strains were assembled from comprehensive, population-based collections from decades of cases. At the time it was conducted, this study represented the largest bacterial genome study of this type. Genome sequence analysis permitted us to unambiguously demonstrate that this epidemic was a consequence of three distinct genetic events that caused the emergence of a new, hypervirulent clone of emm1 GAS. Moreover, we were able to precisely define the order of these three genetic events, which involved acquisition of a bacteriophage (bacterial virus) that encodes scarlet fever toxin variant 1, also known as streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin A1 (SpeA1), a superantigen. Subsequently, SpeA2 evolved from SpeA1 by a single nucleotide change that resulted in one amino acid replacement in a functionally important region of the toxin. The third “big bang” genetic event was acquisition by horizontal gene transfer of a large chromosomal region containing the nga-ifs-slo three-gene operon that encodes two secreted toxins, NAD+-glycohydrolase and streptolysin O, a membrane lytic toxin. Thus, we demonstrated that the molecular evolutionary events occurring in clonal progeny of just one bacterial cell ultimately produced tens of millions of human infections globally (12). Our analysis also resolved a decades-old controversy about the sequence of genomic alterations producing the explosive global epidemic (34,38-40,43-45). Importantly, using nonhuman primate models of necrotizing myositis and pharyngitis, we showed that the contemporary clone is more virulent than a pre-epidemic reference strain (12,46,47). Quite unexpectedly, we discovered that the contemporary clone rose to global prominence in only a three-year period (1987–1989), essentially displacing antecedent emm1 strains over very broad geographic regions (12).

Although the population genomic study described above was of critical importance in precisely defining the genetic steps involved in evolution to a more virulent state, it did not address all questions. For example, it left open the exact molecular pathogenesis processes underpinning how the final genetic event (horizontal acquisition of the nga-ifs-slo gene region encoding the NAD+-glycohydrolase and streptolysin O toxins) triggered the global spread of progeny of the contemporary clone and increased infection frequency and severity. These matters were addressed in two subsequent studies (46,47). Using molecular genetic tools and animal infection models, we used isogenic mutant strains to discover that only three polymorphisms occurring in this toxin gene region increased toxin production, increased resistance to killing by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes, increased bacterial proliferation in vivo, and increased virulence in animal models of pharyngitis and necrotizing fasciitis (46,47). We also showed that production of both the NAD+-glycohydrolase and streptolysin O toxins was required for full virulence (47). That is, genetic inactivation of either the nga or slo gene decreased virulence to an approximately similar degree, and genetic inactivation of both genes greatly decreased virulence in relevant animal infection models. We did not expect to discover that an analogous recombinational replacement event also contributed to an intercontinental epidemic of type emm89 GAS infections and to the emergence and spread of progeny of a type emm28 GAS clone (13,14; see below). Thus, in the aggregate, our studies delineated the molecular changes in GAS that enhance upper respiratory tract fitness, increased resistance to innate immune defenses, and increased tissue destruction. A recent study (15) reported that recombinational replacement involving the nga-ifs-slo region is more widespread than emm1, emm28, and emm89 GAS. However, the role in virulence of other emm types was not addressed by construction and analysis of isogenic mutant strains in animal infection models of virulence.

Serotype M3 Epidemics

Type emm3 GAS also is a common cause of severe invasive infections in many geographic regions (25-27,30-33). Several epidemiologic studies have shown that type emm3 strains cause a disproportionate number of severe invasive infections such as bacteremia, streptococcal toxic shock syndrome, and necrotizing fasciitis (25-27). Importantly, large population-based studies conducted in Canada and the United States have reported that emm3 strains cause a higher rate of lethal infections than strains of other emm types (25-27). Like type emm1 GAS, emm3 strains can also undergo very rapid shifts in disease frequency. That is, they experience epidemic behavior, but the molecular causes are not known.

We conducted several studies (9,48-50) designed to delineate molecular genetic processes contributing to emm3 clone emergence and disease epidemics. Analysis of 255 emm3 strains cultured from patients in Ontario, Canada, during two peaks of severe infections occurring over 11 years found that distinct emm3 genotypes experienced rapid population expansion and caused infections that differed significantly in character, including severity. A four-amino-acid duplication in the extreme aminoterminus of M protein was proven to be a contributor to one of the epidemic waves. This is the region of M protein against which the host generates opsonizing antibodies. Importantly, this four-amino-acid change caused a difference in serologic reactivity and resulted in a significant difference in the ability of human polymorphonuclear leukocytes to phagocytosize and kill GAS expressing these variants. Given that the aminoterminal region of M protein is a well-known vaccine candidate, it is reasonable to think that this finding has implications for vaccine development and deployment, including the potential for rapid selection of immune escape variants.

Serotype M28 Epidemics

Type emm28 GAS strains are of importance to human infection biology for several reasons. First, emm28 strains are among the top five emm types that cause invasive GAS infections in the United States and many European countries (25-27,30-33). In some countries, emm28 strains are the most common cause of invasive infections and pharyngitis (30). Second, as noted above, type emm28 strains are repeatedly significantly overrepresented among cases of puerperal sepsis and neonatal infections (24,28). Third, the great majority of emm28 strains are a chimera in that they contain a 37-kb segment of DNA [termed region of difference 2 (RD2)] that was likely acquired from group B streptococcus, a very common cause of neonatal infections (51,52). This segment of DNA encodes at least seven secreted extracellular proteins, some of which are made during the course of human infections, as shown by serologic studies (53). A recent study reported that deletion of this entire region altered pathogen-host interaction in vitro (54).

Knowing that important new information about epidemic behavior could be acquired by molecular population genomic analysis coupled with bacterial pathogenesis techniques, we tested the hypothesis that new understanding of emm28 infection biology would be obtained by integrated analysis of the population genomics, transcriptomics, and virulence (13). We assembled an international collection of 2,101 emm28 strains recovered in comprehensive population-based surveys of invasive infections. The genomes of all strains were sequenced. We conducted RNA-seq transcriptome analysis on 492 phylogenetically diverse strains, and 50 genetically representative strains were tested for virulence in a mouse model of necrotizing myositis (13). We made new discoveries about the molecular pathogenesis of type emm28 GAS. For example, we found a striking magnitude of transcriptome variation among a relatively closely related genetic clade of organisms. In addition, application of statistical methods and machine learning led to the discovery of a new molecular genetic process that underpins enhanced virulence in some GAS strains (13). We determined that the RD2 region noted above has a homopolymeric tract of T residues that is highly polymorphic in number, resulting in variation in expression of a transcript that encodes a regulatory protein that controls expression of one of the secreted extracellular proteins. Finally, we found that one of the genetic subclades has increased in frequency rapidly in the United States (i.e., has experienced a recent epidemic wave) (13). Strains of this epidemic subclade were associated with puerperal sepsis, neonatal infections, and female genital tract infections and were also significantly more virulent in the mouse model of necrotizing myositis (13). Just like the type emm1 epidemic clone, the emm28 epidemic subclade has experienced a reciprocal recombination event involving the nga-ifs-slo region. The acquired nga-ifs-slo region is essentially identical to the analogous three-gene operon present in Streptococcus dysgalactiae subspecies equisimilis. Moreover, the acquired variant region produces significantly higher transcript levels of nga-ifs-slo, resulting in increased production of the two secreted toxins, NAD+-glycohydrolase and streptolysin O (13). Molecular genetic studies using isogenic mutant strains have confirmed that the upregulation of this three-gene operon is responsible for enhanced mouse and nonhuman primate virulence (13).

Basic Science and Public Health Utility of the Availability of Large and Well-Characterized Strain Samples with High-Quality Genome Sequences

One of the initial goals of our study of the molecular genetic underpinnings of GAS epidemics was to generate sufficiently robust datasets from large strain samples that could be used to analyze matters of basic science and public health utility, as need arises. The datasets arising from our study of emm1, emm28, emm89, and other emm types GAS strains have indeed proved to be useful in an analysis of recently identified nonsynonymous (amino acid-changing) mutations in the pbp2x gene associated with decreased susceptibility to beta-lactam antibiotics (55,56). Many generations of physicians, clinical microbiologists, and others have been taught that GAS strains are universally highly susceptible to beta-lactam antibiotics. However, a recent report (55) describing two GAS strains with decreased susceptibility to several beta-lactam antibiotics was very concerning and compelled us to rapidly bioinformatically interrogate our >7,000 genomes of type emm1, emm28, and emm89 strains for nonsynonymous mutations in pbp2x (56). We found that approximately 2% of organisms had amino acid-conferring mutations in pbp2x, usually one amino acid replacement per strain. The strains with pbp2x mutations were grown and examined by standard clinical laboratory methods for decreased susceptibility to benzylpenicillin, ampicillin, and several other beta-lactams. Because the strains had been archived over several decades and obtained from patients in multiple countries, we now know (unfortunately) that GAS strains with decreased susceptibility to beta-lactam antibiotics are neither exceedingly rare nor geographically restricted (56). These findings illustrate the importance of ongoing routine monitoring of beta-lactam susceptibility phenotypes in GAS strains.

In an analogous use of genomic and phenotypic data generated from banked strains, Lynskey et al. (57) discovered that emm1 organisms associated with a recent upsurge of scarlet fever activity in the United Kingdom represented a new emm1 clone that is characterized by increased production of scarlet fever toxin (SpeA).

CONCLUSIONS

Studies addressing the molecular genetic processes contributing to GAS strain emergence and epidemics have been a fruitful area of investigation over approximately 30 years. Some of these distinct processes include seemingly relatively minor genetic changes such as nucleotide mutations that upregulate toxin gene expression and en bloc horizontal gene transfer involving acquisition of one or more toxin genes that influence pathogen-host interactions. Delineation of the molecular contributors to bacterial pathogen strain emergence and epidemic spread is of fundamental biomedical importance and has substantial relevance to public health and downstream clinical and translational research, including vaccinology. The strategies used to investigate GAS are generally applicable to any pathogen for which there are available appropriate strain collections, genetic manipulation techniques, and animal infection models that mimic human disease.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND FINANCIAL SUPPORT

Some of the research summarized herein was supported in part by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease and the Fondren Foundation.

The author gratefully acknowledges the contributions to this work on GAS epidemics by many extraordinarily dedicated current and past laboratory members including but not limited to Stephen J. Beres, Concepcion C. Cantu, Jesus M. Eraso, Priyanka Kachroo, Waleed Nasser, Matthew Ojeda Saavedra, Randall J. Olsen, and Luchang Zhu; Frank R. DeLeo (long-term collaborator at the National Institute of Allergy and Diseases); and outstanding collaborators over the years from the Nordic countries including but not limited to Dominique A. Caugant, Magnus Gottsfredsson, Karl G. Kristinsson, and Jaana Vuopio. None of this work would have been accomplished without the support of these many colleagues. The author is also indebted to the late Richard M. Krause for his many intellectual contributions to the work done on GAS epidemics in the author's laboratory and to Camille M. Leugers for her critical reading of the manuscript.

Footnotes

Potential Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed.

DISCUSSION

Hook, Birmingham: Thank you for your presentation and for your work. Something you said challenged a misperception I may have and that has to do with super spreaders. You are saying that super spreading is a function of the virulence and pathogenicity of the organism. I always thought that super spreaders were, for lack of a better term, special people or maybe it's a combination. I would love to hear your thoughts.

Musser, Houston: We believe that super spreaders occur in certain hosts who have very high CFUs in the upper respiratory tract, caused in part by a lack of sufficient immunity, coupled with genetic attributes of the infecting GAS strain. Many of you in the audience—especially the young folks who know the literature from the 1950s—know about the studies done by a husband/wife team that really showed that once you get above about 107 CFUs in the upper respiratory tract then you can effectively spread. Those of course were done in the military populations. So we really think of it as certain individuals who have the ability—for reasons that we don't understand but I have some ideas about—to develop very high levels of CFUs and then spread to others quite effectively. The ability to upregulate the nga and slo toxins rapidly, as I showed and we have published on, we think basically trumps any preexisting host immunity in the upper respiratory tract. We actually have shown that as well in the nonhuman primates. But it is clearly an intricate sort of tango between the host and the pathogen. I don't know if that answers your question, but I am happy to talk more about it.

NOTE: This paper was presented in 2018 at the ACCA meeting in Sarasota, Florida, but the manuscript was not submitted for editorial review until the Fall of 2019, so it is being included in this volume of our Transactions.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Selander RK, Musser JM, Caugant DA, et al. Population genetics of pathogenic bacteria. Microb Pathog. 1987;3:1–7. doi: 10.1016/0882-4010(87)90032-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Selander R. K., Musser J.M. “The Population Genetics of Bacterial Pathogenesis.”. In: Iglewski B. H., Clark V. L., editors. Molecular Basis of Bacterial Pathogenesis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press; 1990. pp. 11–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Maiden MC, Bygraves JA, Feil E, et al. Multilocus sequence typing: a portable approach to the identification of clones within populations of pathogenic microorganisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:3140–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.6.3140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Spratt BG, Maiden MC. Bacterial population genetics, evolution and epidemiology. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999;354:701–10. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1999.0423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Selander RK, Levin BR. Genetic diversity and structure in Escherichia coli populations. Science. 1980;210:545–7. doi: 10.1126/science.6999623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Levin BR. Periodic selection, infectious gene exchange and the genetic structure of E. coli populations. Genetics. 1981;99:1–23. doi: 10.1093/genetics/99.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Caugant DA, Levin BR, Selander RK. Genetic diversity and temporal variation in the E. coli population of a human host. Genetics. 1981;98:467–90. doi: 10.1093/genetics/98.3.467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Caugant DA, Levin BR, Lidin-Janson G, et al. Genetic diversity and relationships among strains of Escherichia coli in the intestine and those causing urinary tract infections. Prog Allergy. 1983;33:203–27. doi: 10.1159/000318331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Beres SB, Carroll RK, Shea PR, et al. Molecular complexity of successive bacterial epidemics deconvoluted by comparative pathogenomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:4371–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911295107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Morelli G, Song Y, Mazzoni CJ, et al. Yersinia pestis genome sequencing identifies patterns of global phylogenetic diversity. Nat Genet. 2010;42:1140–3. doi: 10.1038/ng.705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Holden MT, Hsu LY, Kurt K, et al. A genomic portrait of the emergence, evolution, and global spread of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pandemic. Genome Res. 2013;23:653–64. doi: 10.1101/gr.147710.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nasser W, Beres SB, Olsen RJ, et al. Evolutionary pathway to increased virulence and epidemic group A streptococcus disease derived from 3,615 genome sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:E1768–76. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1403138111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kachroo P, Eraso JM, Beres SB, et al. Integrated analysis of population genomics, transcriptomics and virulence provides novel insights into Streptococcus pyogenes virulence. Nat Genetics. 2019;51:548–59. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0343-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhu L, Olsen RJ, Nasser W, et al. Trading capsule for increased cytotoxin production: contribution to virulence of a newly emerged clade of emm89 Streptococcus pyogenes. mBio. 2015;6:e01378–15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01378-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Turner CE, Holden MTG, Blane B, et al. The emergence of successful Streptococcus pyogenes lineages through convergent pathways of capsule loss and recombination directing high toxin production. mBio. 2019;10:e02521–19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02521-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Reuter S, Connor TR, Barquist L, et al. Parallel independent evolution of pathogenicity within the genus Yersinia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:6768–73. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317161111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Caugant DA, Brynildsrud OB. Neisseria meningitidis: using genomics to understand diversity, evolution and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Microbiol. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0282-6. Nov. 8, 2019;doi:10.1038/s41579-019-0282-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Carapetis JR, Steer AC, Mulholland EK, Weber M. The global burden of group A streptococcal diseases. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5:685–94. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70267-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Watkins DA, Johnson CO, Colquhoun SM, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of rheumatic heart disease, 1990–2015. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:713–22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1603693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Walker MJ, Barnett TC, McArthur JD, et al. Disease manifestations and pathogenic mechanisms of group A streptococcus. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27:264–301. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00101-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pastural É, McNeil SA, MacKinnon-Cameron D, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a 30-valent M protein-based group A streptococcal vaccine in healthy adult volunteers: a randomized, controlled phase I study. Vaccine. 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.12.005. pii:S0264-410X(19)31645–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rivera-Hernandez T, Carnathan DG, Jones S, et al. An experimental group A streptococcus vaccine that reduces pharyngitis and tonsillitis in a nonhuman primate model. mBio. 2019;10:e00693–19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00693-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ashbaugh CD, Warren HB, Carey VJ, et al. Molecular analysis of the role of the group A streptococcal cysteine protease, hyaluronic acid capsule, and M protein in a murine model of human invasive soft-tissue infection. J Clin Invest. 1998;102:550–60. doi: 10.1172/JCI3065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Colman G, Tanna A, Efstratiou A, et al. The serotypes of Streptococcus pyogenes present in Britain during 1980–1990 and their association with disease. J Med Microbiol. 1993;39:165–78. doi: 10.1099/00222615-39-3-165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sharkawy A, Low DE, Saginur R, et al. Severe group A streptococcal soft-tissue infections in Ontario: 1992–1996. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34:454–60. doi: 10.1086/338466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.O'Brien KL, Beall B, Barrett NL, et al. Epidemiology of invasive group A streptococcus disease in the United States, 1995–1999. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35:268–76. doi: 10.1086/341409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Li Z, Sakota V, Jackson D, et al. Array of M protein gene subtypes in 1064 recent invasive group A streptococcus isolates recovered from the active bacterial core surveillance. J Infect Dis. 2003;188:1587–92. doi: 10.1086/379050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chuang I, Van Beneden C, Beall B, et al. Population-based surveillance for postpartum invasive group A streptococcus infections, 1995–2000. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35:665–70. doi: 10.1086/342062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Smoot JC, Barbian KD, van Gompel JJ, et al. Genome sequence and comparative microarray analysis of serotype M18 group A streptococcus strains associated with acute rheumatic fever outbreaks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:4668–73. doi: 10.1073/pnas.062526099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gherardi G, Vitali LA, Creti R. Prevalent emm types among invasive GAS in Europe and North America since the year 2000. Front Public Health. 2018;6:59. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.O'Loughlin RE, Roberson A, Cieslak PR, et al. The epidemiology of invasive group A streptococcal infection and potential vaccine implications: United States, 2000–2004. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:853–62. doi: 10.1086/521264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chochua S, Metcalf BJ, Li Z, et al. Population and whole genome sequence based characterization of invasive group A streptococci recovered in the United States during 2015. mBio. 2017;8:e01422–17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01422-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nelson GE, Pondo T, Toews KA, et al. Epidemiology of invasive group A streptococcal infections in the United States, 2005–2012. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63:478–86. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Musser J.M., Krause R. M. “The Revival of Group A Streptococcal Diseases, with a Commentary on Staphylococcal Toxic Shock Syndrome.”. In: Krause R. M., editor. Emerging Infections. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1998. pp. 185–218. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sumby P, Tart AH, Musser JM. A nonhuman primate model of acute group A streptococcus pharyngitis. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;431:255–67. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-032-8_20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhu L, Olsen RJ, Beres SB, et al. Gene fitness landscape of group A streptococcus during necrotizing myositis. J Clin Invest. 2019;129:887–901. doi: 10.1172/JCI124994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhu L, Olsen RJ, Saavedra MO, et al. Genome-wide screens identify group A streptococcus surface proteins promoting primate genital tract colonization and virulence. Amer J Pathol. 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2019.12.003. In press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Musser JM, Hauser AR, Kim MH, et al. Streptococcus pyogenes causing toxic shock-like-syndrome and other invasive diseases: clonal diversity and pyrogenic exotoxin expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:2668–72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.7.2668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Cleary PP, Kaplan EL, Handley JP, et al. Clonal basis for resurgence of serious streptococcal disease in the 1980s. Lancet. 1992;321:518–21. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)90339-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Musser JM, Kapur V, Szeto J, et al. Genetic diversity and relationships among Streptococcus pyogenes strains expressing serotype M1 protein: recent intercontinental spread of a subclone causing episodes of invasive disease. Infect Immun. 1995;63:994–1003. doi: 10.1128/iai.63.3.994-1003.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necrotizing_fasciitis. Accessed December 27, 2019.
  • 42.Cleary PP, LaPenta D, Vessela R, et al. A globally disseminated M1 subclone of group A streptococci differs from other subclones by 70 kilobases of prophage DNA and capacity for high-frequency intracellular invasion. Infect Immun. 1998;66:5592–7. doi: 10.1128/iai.66.11.5592-5597.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Maamary PG, Ben Zakour NL, Cole JN, et al. Tracing the evolutionary history of the pandemic group A streptococcal M1T1 clone. FASEB J. 2012;26:4675–84. doi: 10.1096/fj.12-212142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Aziz RK, Edwards RA, Taylor WW, et al. Mosaic prophages with horizontally acquired genes account for the emergence and diversification of the globally disseminated M1T1 clone of Streptococcus pyogenes. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:3311–8. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.10.3311-3318.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Aziz RK, Kotb M. Rise and persistence of global M1T1 clone of Streptococcus pyogenes. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:1511–7. doi: 10.3201/eid1410.071660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhu L, Olsen RJ, Nasser W, et al. A molecular trigger for intercontinental epidemics of group A streptococcus. J Clin Invest. 2015;125:3545–59. doi: 10.1172/JCI82478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhu L, Olsen RJ, Lee JD, et al. Contribution of secreted NADase and streptolysin O to the pathogenesis of epidemic serotype M1 Streptococcus pyogenes infections. Amer J Pathol. 2017;187:605–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2016.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Beres SB, Sylva GL, Barbian KD, et al. Genome sequence of a serotype M3 strain of group A streptococcus: phage-encoded toxins, the high-virulence phenotype, and clone emergence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:10078–83. doi: 10.1073/pnas.152298499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Beres SB, Sylva GL, Sturdevant DE, et al. Genome-wide molecular dissection of serotype M3 group A streptococcus strains causing two recent epidemics of invasive infections. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:11833–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404163101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Beres SB, Richter EW, Nagiec MJ, et al. Molecular genetic anatomy of inter- and intra-serotype variation in the human bacterial pathogen group A streptococcus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:7059–64. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510279103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Green NM, Zhang S, Porcella SF, et al. Genome sequence of a serotype M28 strain of group A streptococcus: potential new insights into puerperal sepsis and bacterial disease specificity. J Infect Dis. 2005;192:760–70. doi: 10.1086/430618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Green NM, Beres SB, Graviss EA, et al. Genetic diversity among type emm28 group A streptococcus strains causing invasive infections and pharyngitis. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:4083–91. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.8.4083-4091.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zhang S, Green NM, Sitkiewicz I, et al. Identification and characterization of an antigen I/II family protein produced by group A streptococcus. Infect Immun. 2006;74:4200–13. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00493-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Jain I, Sarkar P, Danger JL, et al. A mobile genetic element promotes the association between serotype M28 group A streptococcus isolates and cases of puerperal sepsis. J Infect Dis. 2019;220:882–91. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Vannice K, Ricaldi J, Nanduri S, et al. Streptococcus pyogenes pbp2x mutation confers reduced susceptibility to beta-lactam antibiotics. Clin Infect Dis. 2019 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz1000. doi:10.1093/cid/ciz1000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Musser JM, Beres SB, Zhu L, et al. Reduced in vitro susceptibility of Streptococcus pyogenes to beta-lactam antibiotics associated with mutations in the pbp2x gene is geographically widespread. J Clin Microbiol. 2020;58:e01993–19. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01993-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lynskey NN, Jauneikaite E, Li HK, et al. Emergence of dominant toxigenic M1T1 Streptococcus pyogenes clone during increased scarlet fever activity in England: a population-based molecular epidemiological study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19:1209–18. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30446-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association are provided here courtesy of American Clinical and Climatological Association

RESOURCES