Abstract
Recently, a novel virus has spread worldwide causing the disease called COVID-19. In addition to putting people's lives at risk and causing mortality, various problems have occurred due to the negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Quarantine, social distancing, and the obligation to use protective tools have led to sometimes long term closing of various jobs and services, including rehabilitation services. For instance, the disease has interrupted the provision of Speech-Language Pathology (SLP) services to children due to the need for face-to-face communication between Speech and Language Pathologists (SLPs) and children during the evaluation and treatment processes. Therefore, here, we described the quality of providing SLP services during the COVID-19 pandemic and the negative effects of the disease on the provision of SLP services. In addition, we made an attempt to explain concerns and problems raised by the families, the importance of providing SLP services during the critical period of speech and language development, telepractice services, the roles of speech-language-hearing related scientific associations, and the roles of SLPs during the outbreak of COVID-19.
Keywords: COVID-19, Coronavirus, Speech, Language, Speech-language pathology, Telepractice
1. Introduction
Coronavirus is a major pathogen that can cause respiratory diseases. Diseases caused by coronavirus pose a serious public health risk [1,2]. The Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) are two recently emerged respiratory diseases caused by a coronavirus that seriously threated humans' health [2]. Recently, a novel type of the coronavirus has been reported, that seems to be much more transmittable, compared to the previous types [1,3,4]. The new disease caused by coronavirus is called COVID-19 by the World Health Organization (WHO) [2,5]. On December 31, 2019, the Wuhan Municipal Health Commission in Wuhan City, Hubei province, China, reported the first case of the COVID-19 disease [1,5,6]. Following that, the disease was reported in other countries of the world, and the pandemic nature of the disease led to reporting it in more than 200 countries [7,8]. COVID-19 is highly contagious [9], and people infected with the virus can transmit it before presenting significant symptoms [2]. As such, the prevalence of COVID-19 was higher than that of the previous types of coronavirus-related diseases (e.g., SARS, MERS, and Ebola) in the world and quickly became a global pandemic [10]. In addition to putting people's lives at risk and a high mortality rate, the COVID-19 pandemic has negatively affected people's lives in many ways [11,12]. Various occupations and service-providing centers have temporarily been closed down due to the necessity of quarantine during the COVID-19 outbreak [12]. This is especially true for services that require a close distance between the service receiver and the service provider [13]. Speech and Language Pathologists (SLPs) usually require face-to-face communication with their patients to provide assessment and treatment services. As a result, the provision of services in this field has seriously been interrupted so as to observe the necessity of quarantine and social distancing.
Therefore, the present paper aimed to describe service provision to treat speech-language disorders of children during the COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, we made an attempt to explain the problems, concerns, and solutions in this field as raised by this pandemic.
1.1. The negative effect of COVID-19 on the provision of speech-language pathology (SLP) services
COVID-19 can easily be transmitted in case of close contact between people in case Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), including medical masks, gloves, face shield, and other protective tools, are not used [4,14]. Therefore, it is crucial to put distance between yourself and other people outside your home and use PPE to avoid coronavirus infection. Meanwhile, provision of SLP services requires full communication between SLPs and patients, especially children. Given the necessity of having face-to-face communication, observing the speech articulators of SLPs by children, and establishing eye contact, SLPs cannot practically use PPE and may even need to touch the child for some reasons or use special toys to communicate with the children, which severely increase the risk of disease transmission. Therefore, in-person treatment is impossible in the area of SLP during the COVID-19 outbreak.
1.2. Families’ concerns and problems
Families of children with different disabilities and communication disorders (e.g., hearing loss, stuttering, autism, cleft lip and palate, and language developmental disorders) deal with frequent problems [[15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]]. The negative effects of children's disorder lead to physical, psychological, social, and economic discomforts in parents [[16], [17], [18],20,23,24]. The COVID-19 outbreak has probably caused other problems for these families, increasing the parents' physical and psychological issues during the pandemic [12]. This can negatively affect the quality of parental care and conducting speech-language exercises and this is while, the families of these children have typically the double burden of financial issues to treat their children's problems [17]. Meanwhile, with the outbreak of COVID-19 disease and its negative economic effects, families are likely to be under more economic pressure [25]. Families of these children deal with various psychological issues due to their children's problems [19,24], which are intensified by their concerns regarding the treatment of their children's speech-language problems. Overall, it seems that COVID-19 outbreak has increased the problems and concerns in families with children who suffer from various communication disorders and inabilities. Moreover, the sudden onset of certain speech and language disorders (e.g., stuttering) in children can increase parents' concerns for immediate assessment of the child's condition [19].
1.3. The importance of providing treatment during the critical period of speech and language development
The majority of children receiving SLP services are in the critical period of speech and language development [26], and will probably face several problems including reduced academic performance, reduced job opportunities, social outcomes, and reduced quality of life in the future in case of losing this golden age [[27], [28], [29]]. In fact, age is one of the most important factors in the development of speech and language [30]. The high complexity of speech and language development as well as the relationship between speech and language development and the development of other areas, such as cognitive and physical development, are other indications of the importance of early intervention for children who need SLP services [29]. Moreover, some disorders such as stuttering may become chronic in adulthood if left untreated in childhood, facing the individual with various challenges to resolve the issue [31]. Some other children, such as children with hearing loss who have recently received hearing aids or who have had cochlear implants, too, need to receive intensive speech-language pathology services [26,32]. If hearing-impaired children are deprived of sensory and auditory stimuli during critical period of speech and language development, they will have many problems in the future, and thus early treatment is very important for these children [30]. The outbreak of COVID-19 and closing of most SLP centers deprive children who are in need of SLP services and treatment and will cause numerous problems for them and their families, in case the golden time to receive SLP services is lost. As such, it is critical to find a solution to provide favorable and high-quality services to these children at times such as the COVID-19 outbreak, when the in-person provision of services is impossible.
1.4. Telepractice services: the best choice during a pandemic
In-person speech-language pathology is not possible for many individuals for different reasons, including geographical and economic issues, especially for low-income communities [28]. However, a solution is telepractice services and provision of SLP services from a distance [27,28]. Telemedicine is defined as using remote communication technologies to provide medical-treatment services and information. Since 1997, telepractice has mostly focused on providing purely medical services to other healthcare specialties, such as SLP [33]. In addition, telepractice refers to the use of technology to provide health-related services that leads to a link between the physician and patient so that education, counseling, assessment, and even intervention and support are provided remotely [33]. In fact, telepractice provides the potential to implement health care services in remote areas, too [28].
Since SLP mostly relies on communication through visual-auditory and perceptual aspects, telepractice could be a proper opportunity to provide care in this field [34]. In addition, many health care problems, such as rehabilitation, can be solved via telepractice protocols [33]. Nonetheless, there are restrictions in the use of telepractice in the community of SLPs due to certain barriers such as limited repayments, rules for issuing necessary licenses, and confidentiality terms regarding medical information [35]. Up to 2002, only 9% of SLPs used telepractice as a platform for therapeutic evaluation and intervention [28]. However, interest in research in this field has increased during the past decade [36], and numerous studies have reported the positive effects of using telepractice on evaluation and treatment of various speech-language disorders [27,28,35,[37], [38], [39]]. Currently, the outbreak of COVID-19 disease has disrupted the provision of services in many SLP clinics, and closing of the clinics has resulted in canceling speech-language therapy sessions for children with speech and language disorders. Given the need for continuous therapy sessions in order to treat speech-language disorders, the application of telepractice may eliminate problems in this area to some extent while preventing the transmission of COVID-19 [13], and guaranteeing the health of SLPs and children. The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) has assured that the assessment and treatment process in speech and language pathology can be done through telepractice [40].
1.5. The role of speech-language-hearing associations during COVID-19 pandemic
The outbreak of COVID-19 revealed the need for a higher emphasis on telepractice in speech-language-hearing associations to provide remote care in this field [41]. It is better to hold proper telepractice language-related courses in these associations across the world and in various countries so that therapists' awareness about this type of service provision is heightened and research on this issue is prioritized. It seems that the measures taken by these associations could improve the therapists’ attitude toward telepractice and increase their knowledge and skills. In addition, these associations must pursue legal efforts to make these services legitimate and also covered by insurance in various countries. However, some countries are already providing insurance for telepractice services. Overall, it is suggested that further measures be taken by scientific associations to eliminate barriers in the path of therapists and promote telepractice facilitators so that this type of care be used more extensively by SLPs. It should be noted that so far many associations, including ASHA, have emphasized on the use of telepractice by SLPs [40,42]. The ASHA have mentioned that telepractice is a viable process for delivering SLP services during COVID-19 pandemic and that both evaluation and treatment were possible through telepractice [40].
1.6. The role of therapists during COVID-19 pandemic and outbreak
Since many healthcare centers and occupations, including SLP clinics, are closed due to the numerous negative effects of pandemics, such as COVID-19 disease, SLPs are obligated to improve their knowledge and experience in the field of telepractice. Using this method, therapists can perform their duties and treat patients while reducing the negative effects of COVID-19 on their economic status and income. In addition, they can be more protective of themselves by providing remote SLP services and decrease the chance of COVID-19 transmission to children and their caregivers [13,41]. Given the negative effects of COVID-19 on cognitive abilities and nervous system [43], SLPs may deal with patients who are treated cases of COVID-19 and who now require SLP services to treat their preexisting disorders (e.g. memory problems and executive function deficits) [[43], [44], [45]]. Since these patients are still carriers of the disease, telepractice is the best method to provide required services. Moreover, by obtaining more experience and knowledge about COVID-19, SLPs can be prepared for the future, in case remote care is needed.
Another role that SLPs can play for patients with COVID-19 is to provide communication paths for speechless patients who are in the mechanically ventilated condition. Patients with COVID-19 who underwent tracheal intubation or mechanical ventilation need to interact with the treatment staff, especially nurses [46,47]. Patients, who are in this condition, need to be heard, have control over their conditions and treatment status, convey their problems, and collaborate in decision making regarding their health [48]. When speech and communication with others are not possible, speechless patients report concerns and frustration [49]. Also, the lack of patient's communication with the treatment staff has a negative impact on the quality of patient care [50]. SLPs have the potential to improve the interaction between nonspeaking patients and nurses in the intensive care unit using Alternative and Augmentative Communication (AAC) and hence promote patient treatment outcomes [50,51]. AAC strategies can equip treatment staff to interact effectively with the patients [49].
2. Conclusion
COVID-19 pandemic has caused numerous problems in people's lives all around the world. In addition, the disease has caused many problems for healthcare providers and several occupations because of its high transmission rate. In this regard, a problem related to service provision is related to SLP in children. Given the need of many children to SLP services on specific times and the sensitivity and significance of childhood in terms of speech and language development, it seems that any interference in receiving these services can lead to the persistence of speech and language problems in children and as a result decrease their quality of life in the future. As such, the active therapists of the field must dedicate efforts to the proper provision of telepractice services. Meanwhile, the speech-language-hearing associations and other diseases that require SLP services should take solemn measures to train therapists so as to provide telepractice services and increase the quality of these services.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declared that there is no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgements
This study was financially supported by the Semnan University of Medical Sciences (grant number 1768). This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Iran (IR.SEMUMS.REC.1399.072).
References
- 1.Rothan H.A., Byrareddy S.N. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. J. Autoimmun. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cascella M., Rajnik M., Cuomo A., Dulebohn S.C., Di Napoli R. StatPearls Publishing; 2020. Features, Evaluation and Treatment Coronavirus (COVID-19). StatPearls [Internet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bogoch II., Watts A., Thomas-Bachli A., Huber C., Kraemer M.U., Khan K. Pneumonia of unknown etiology in wuhan, China: potential for international spread via commercial air travel. J. Trav. Med. 2020;27(2) doi: 10.1093/jtm/taaa008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Shereen M.A., Khan S., Kazmi A., Bashir N., Siddique R. COVID-19 infection: origin, transmission, and characteristics of human coronaviruses. J. Adv. Res. 2020;24:91–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2020.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhao S., Lin Q., Ran J., Musa S.S., Yang G., Wang W., Lou Y., Gao D., Yang L., He D. Preliminary estimation of the basic reproduction number of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in China, from 2019 to 2020: a data-driven analysis in the early phase of the outbreak. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020;92:214–217. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.01.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhu N., Zhang D., Wang W., Li X., Yang B., Song J., Zhao X., Huang B., Shi W., Lu R. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382(8):727–733. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Warren M.S., Skillman S.W. arXiv preprint; 2020. Mobility Changes in Response to COVID-19. arXiv:200314228. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ahmad I., Rathore F.A. Neurological manifestations and complications of COVID-19: a literature review. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2020;77:8–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.05.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Park M., Thwaites R.S., Openshaw P.J. COVID‐19: lessons from SARS and MERS. Eur. J. Immunol. 2020;50:308. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hellewell J., Abbott S., Gimma A., Bosse N.I., Jarvis C.I., Russell T.W., Munday J.D., Kucharski A.J., Edmunds W.J., Sun F. Feasibility of controlling COVID-19 outbreaks by isolation of cases and contacts. The Lancet Global Health. 2020;8(4):488–496. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30074-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Brown E., Gray R., Lo Monaco S., O'Donoghue B., Nelson B., Thompson A., Francey S., McGorry P. Schizophrenia Research; 2020. The Potential Impact of COVID-19 on Psychosis: A Rapid Review of Contemporary Epidemic and Pandemic Research. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ornell F., Schuch J.B., Sordi A.O., Kessler F.H.P. “Pandemic fear” and COVID-19: mental health burden and strategies. Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry. 2020;42(3):232–235. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2020-0008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Smith A.C., Thomas E., Snoswell C.L., Haydon H., Mehrotra A., Clemensen J., Caffery L.J. Telehealth for global emergencies: implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) J. Telemed. Telecare. 2020;26(5):309–313. doi: 10.1177/1357633X20916567. 1357633X20916567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Organization Wh . World Health Organization; 2020. Rational Use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): Interim Guidance, 19 March 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Allik H., Larsson J.-O., Smedje H. Health-related quality of life in parents of school-age children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Health Qual. Life Outcome. 2006;4:1. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Aras I., Stevanović R., Vlahović S., Stevanović S., Kolarić B., Kondić L. Health related quality of life in parents of children with speech and hearing impairment. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;78:323–329. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lee M.H., Matthews A.K., Park C. Determinants of health-related quality of life among mothers of children with cerebral palsy. J. Pediatr. Nurs. 2019;44:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2018.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Limm H. Perception of stress by mothers of children with language development disorders. Prax. Kinderpsychol. Kinderpsychiatr. 1998;47:541–551. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Langevin M., Packman A., Onslow M. Parent perceptions of the impact of stuttering on their preschoolers and themselves. J. Commun. Disord. 2010;43:407–423. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2010.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.McStay R.L., Trembath D., Dissanayake C. Stress and family quality of life in parents of children with autism spectrum disorder: parent gender and the double ABCX model. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2014;44:3101–3118. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2178-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Vasilopoulou E., Nisbet J. The quality of life of parents of children with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders. 2016;23:36–49. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kramer F.-J., Baethge C., Sinikovic B., Schliephake H. An analysis of quality of life in 130 families having small children with cleft lip/palate using the impact on family scale. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2007;36:1146–1152. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lee G.K., Lopata C., Volker M.A., Thomeer M.L., Nida R.E., Toomey J.A., Chow S.Y., Smerbeck A.M. Health-related quality of life of parents of children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities. 2009;24:227–239. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Weigl V., Rudolph M., Eysholdt U., Rosanowski F. Anxiety, depression, and quality of life in mothers of children with cleft lip/palate. Folia Phoniatrica Logop. 2005;57:20–27. doi: 10.1159/000081958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Baldwin R., Tomiura E. 2020. Thinking Ahead about the Trade Impact of COVID-19. Economics in the Time of COVID-19; p. 59. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nicholas J.G., Geers A.E. Effects of early auditory experience on the spoken language of deaf children at 3 years of age. Ear Hear. 2006;27:286. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000215973.76912.c6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wales D., Skinner L., Hayman M. The efficacy of telehealth-delivered speech and language intervention for primary school-age children: a systematic review. Int. J. Telerehabilitation. 2017;9:55. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2017.6219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Taylor O.D., Armfield N.R., Dodrill P., Smith A.C. A review of the efficacy and effectiveness of using telehealth for paediatric speech and language assessment. J. Telemed. Telecare. 2014;20:405–412. doi: 10.1177/1357633X14552388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kaiser A.P., Roberts M.Y. Advances in early communication and language intervention. J. Early Interv. 2011;33:298–309. [Google Scholar]
- 30.May-Mederake B. Early intervention and assessment of speech and language development in young children with cochlear implants. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;76:939–946. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.02.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Guitar B. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013. Stuttering: an Integrated Approach to its Nature and Treatment. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kral A., Dorman M.F., Wilson B.S. Neuronal development of hearing and language: cochlear implants and critical periods. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2019;42:47–65. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-080317-061513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mashima P.A., Birkmire-Peters D.P., Syms M.J., Holtel M.R., Burgess L., Peters L.J. Telehealth: voice therapy using telecommunications technology. Am. J. Speech Lang. Pathol. 2003;12:432–439. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2003/089). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kully D. Telehealth in speech pathology: applications to the treatment of stuttering. J. Telemed. Telecare. 2000;6:39–41. doi: 10.1258/1357633001935509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Keck C.S., Doarn C.R. Telehealth technology applications in speech-language pathology. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2014;20:653–659. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Jafni T.I., Bahari M., Ismail W., Radman A. Understanding the implementation of telerehabilitation at pre-implementation stage: a systematic literature review. Procedia Computer Science. 2017;124:452–460. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Reynolds A.L., Vick J.L., Haak N.J. Telehealth applications in speech-language pathology: a modified narrative review. J. Telemed. Telecare. 2009;15:310–316. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2009.081215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Theodoros D.G. Telerehabilitation for service delivery in speech-language pathology. J. Telemed. Telecare. 2008;14:221–224. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2007.007044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mashima P.A., Doarn C.R. Overview of telehealth activities in speech-language pathology. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2008;14:1101–1117. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2008.0080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (Asha) Service delivery considerations in health care during coronavirus/COVID-19 [internet] https://www.asha.org/SLP/healthcare/SLP-Service-Delivery-Considerations-in-Health-Care-During-Coronavirus/ Available from:
- 41.Sarsak H.I. Telerehabilitation services: a successful paradigm for occupational therapy clinical services. International Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Journal. 2020;5 [Google Scholar]
- 42.Grillo E.U. Building a successful voice telepractice program. Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups. 2019;4:100–110. doi: 10.1044/2018_PERS-SIG3-2018-0014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Carda S., Invernizzi M., Bavikatte G., Bensmaïl D., Bianchi F., Deltombe T., Draulans N., Esquenazi A., Francisco G.E., Gross R., Jacinto L.J., Pérez S.M., O’Dell M.W., Reebye R., Verduzco-Gutierrez M., Wissel J., Molteni F. The role of physical and rehabilitation medicine in the COVID-19 pandemic: the clinician’s view. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2020.04.001. In press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mao L., Wang M., Chen S., He Q., Chang J., Hong C., Zhou Y., Wang D., Miao X., Hu Y. 2020. Neurological Manifestations of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a Retrospective Case Series Study. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Filatov A., Sharma P., Hindi F., Espinosa P.S. Neurological complications of coronavirus disease (covid-19): encephalopathy. Cureus. 2020;12 doi: 10.7759/cureus.7352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Dithole K., Sibanda S., Moleki M.M., Thupayagale‐Tshweneagae G. Exploring communication challenges between nurses and mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit: a structured review. Worldviews Evidence-Based Nurs. 2016;13:197–206. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Laakso K., Hartelius L., Idvall M. Ventilator-supported communication: a case study of patient and staff experiences. J. Med. Speech Lang. Pathol. 2009;17:153–165. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Salem A., Ahmad M.M. Communication with invasive mechanically ventilated patients and the use of alternative devices: integrative review. J. Res. Nurs. 2018;23:614–630. doi: 10.1177/1744987118785987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Finke E.H., Light J., Kitko L. A systematic review of the effectiveness of nurse communication with patients with complex communication needs with a focus on the use of augmentative and alternative communication. J. Clin. Nurs. 2008;17:2102–2115. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02373.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Radtke J.V., Baumann B.M., Garrett K.L., Happ M.B. Listening to the voiceless patient: case reports in assisted communication in the intensive care unit. J. Palliat. Med. 2011;14:791–795. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Braun-Janzen C., Sarchuk L., Murray R.P. Roles of speech-language Pathologists and nurses in providing communication intervention for nonspeaking adults in Acute care: a regional pilot study. Canadian Journal of Speech-Language Pathology & Audiology. 2009;33 [Google Scholar]