Skip to main content
Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 Jul 18;63(8):766–770. doi: 10.1111/myc.13135

COVID‐19‐associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) in patients admitted with severe COVID‐19 pneumonia: An observational study from Pakistan

Nosheen Nasir 1, Joveria Farooqi 2, Syed Faisal Mahmood 1, Kauser Jabeen 2,
PMCID: PMC7361517  PMID: 32585069

Summary

Background

Invasive aspergillosis is a well‐known complication of severe influenza pneumonia with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, recent studies are reporting emergence of aspergillosis in severe COVID‐19 pneumonia, named as COVID‐19‐associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA).

Methods

A retrospective observational study was conducted in patients with severe COVID‐19 pneumonia from February 2020 to April 2020. Patients ≥18 years of age with clinical features and abnormal chest imaging with confirmed COVID‐19 by RT‐PCR for SARS‐CoV‐2 were included. CAPA was diagnosed based on clinical parameters, radiological findings and mycological data. Data were recorded on a structured proforma, and descriptive analysis was performed using Stata ver 12.1.

Results

A total of 147 patients with confirmed COVID‐19 and 23 (15.6%) patients requiring ICU admission were identified. Aspergillus species were isolated from tracheal aspirates of nine (39.1%) patients, and of these, five patients (21.7%) were diagnosed with CAPA and four (17.4%) had Aspergillus colonisation. The mean age of patients with CAPA was 69 years (Median age: 71, IQR: 24, Range: 51‐85), and 3/5 patients were male. The most frequent co‐morbid was diabetes mellitus (4/5). The overall fatality rate of COVID‐19 patients with aspergillosis was 44% (4/9). The cause of death was ARDS in all three patients with CAPA, and the median length of stay was 16 days (IQR: 10; Range 6‐35 days).

Conclusion

This study highlights the need for comparative studies to establish whether there is an association of aspergillosis and COVID‐19 and the need for screening for fungal infections in severe COVID‐19 patients with certain risk factors.

Keywords: COVID‐19‐associated aspergillosis, ICU admission, invasive aspergillosis, Pakistan, severe COVID‐19

1. INTRODUCTION

COVID‐19 was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) in March 2020. 1 Patients with severe COVID‐19 pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) may become prone to invasive aspergillosis due to prolonged ICU admission, use of steroids and immunomodulators. Recent reports from Netherlands, Germany and France report invasive aspergillosis in 19%, 26% and 33% patients with severe COVID‐19 pneumonia, respectively. These studies recommend screening for invasive aspergillosis in severe COVID‐19 patients. 2 , 3 , 4 An expert panel recently recommends that patients with evidence of Aspergillus in serum or bronchoalveolar lavage should be treated with antifungals. The group also recommended need for more epidemiological data for the new entity COVID‐19‐associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA). 5

Therefore, in this study, we describe the clinical manifestations and outcomes of COVID‐19 patients with pulmonary aspergillosis from a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan.

2. METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study on PCR‐positive COVID‐19 patients admitted from March 2020 to April 2020 to the Aga Khan University hospital (AKUH), a 700‐bedded tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. Patients ≥18 years of both sexes, bilateral pulmonary infiltrates, and confirmed COVID‐19 infection based on a positive SARS‐CoV‐2 RT‐PCR were included. COVID‐19‐associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) was diagnosed if there were clinical signs and symptoms, an abnormal lung imaging, respiratory specimen culture (bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), tracheal aspirate or sputum) positive for Aspergillus spp. or a positive serum or lower respiratory samples galactomannan index of more than 0.5 and 1.0, respectively, in patients who were either not improving from COVID‐19 or who worsened after transient improvement of symptoms from COVID‐19.

Putative invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (PIPA) was defined as the isolation of Aspergillus spp. from any lower respiratory tract specimen, together with meeting three criteria: (1) signs and symptoms (eg worsening respiratory failure despite adequate treatment or after transient improvement of symptoms from COVID‐19), (2) abnormal imaging and (3) either (a) immunocompromised host, for example with underlying malignancy or receiving steroids or other immunomodulatory agents, or (b) Aspergillus‐positive smear and culture of tracheal aspirate without any bacteria. 6 , 7 Patients were considered colonised if clinical or imaging findings were not suggestive of infection despite positive cultures for Aspergillus spp. from a lower respiratory tract specimen.

2.1. Laboratory methods

Nasopharyngeal swabs were processed for detection of SARS‐CoV‐2 virus by real‐time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) Cobas® SARS‐CoV‐2 Qualitative assay for use on the Cobas® 6800/8800 Systems (Roche Molecular Systems). Aspergillus species was isolated from the clinical specimen using standard culture methodology. Briefly, a loopful of purulent part of sputa or tracheal aspirate was inoculated on Chocolate agar, Sheep Blood Agar with colistin, nalidixic acid and MacConkey agar each. An additional 0.5‐1 mL of the sample was also inoculated on Sabouraud's dextrose agar with chloramphenicol for improved yield of fungal isolates. Gram stain was also routinely performed for all lower respiratory samples to assess their quality and presence of organisms. Isolates were identified based on colony and microscopic morphology. Galactomannan index (GMI) was determined using Platelia Aspergillus®, Bio‐Rad Laboratories. Beta‐D‐glucan (BG) was performed using Fungitell®, Associates of Cape Cod. The serum and respiratory specimen testing was done within a median of 2 days (IQR: 1; Range −2 to 5 days).

2.2. Ethical consideration

The study was given exemption for ethical approval by the Ethics Review Committee of the Aga Khan University (ERC ref #: 2020‐4821‐10334).

2.3. Data entry and analysis

Data were collected on a structured proforma on the clinical characteristics, radiological findings, laboratory data and outcomes of COVID‐19 patients. Descriptive analysis was performed for demographic features with median and interquartile range (IQR) reported for quantitative variables such as age and length of hospital stay (LOS) and frequencies (percentage) for qualitative variables such as gender, co‐morbid conditions, mortality and complications etc. STATA ver 12.1 was used for data analysis.

3. RESULTS

A total of 147 patients with COVID‐19 were admitted; of these, 23 had ARDS 8 requiring ICU admission. Aspergillus species was isolated from nine patients, and of these, five patients had CAPA (Table 1). None of the patients had a positive GMI, and beta‐D‐glucan was positive in only one patient. Four patients were presumed to have Aspergillus colonisation; two patients were in recovery phase, and in two patients, clinical deterioration was attributed to a concomitant bacterial infection.

TABLE 1.

Patients with severe COVID‐19 with Aspergillosis

No Age/Sex Associated diseases A. species (Number of samples culture positive) Chest radiograph finding GMI/BDG pg/mL Other organisms Complication Treatment Length of stay in days Outcome CAPA Time from COVID‐19 to CAPA/colonization Anti‐COVID‐19 drugs
1 81/M DM A flavus (1) Bilateral peripheral patchy infiltrates 0.14/31 P aeruginosa ARDS, AKI, MODS Amphotericin B 20 Death Yes 10 HCQ, Azithromycin, Tocilizumab
2 60/M DM/HTN A flavus (1) Bilateral interstitial infiltrates 0.125/<7

ARDS, AKI

NSTEMI

No antifungal 25 Discharged No 1 HCQ, Azithromycin, Tocilizumab
3 57/M DM/HTN A flavus/A fumigatus (2) Bilateral peripheral patchy infiltrates, consolidation 0.272/<7 Klebsiella pneumoniae, MRSA ARDS, AKI, MRSA pneumonia, NSTEMI Amphotericin B 6 Death Yes 2 HCQ, Azithromycin, Tocilizumab
4 46/M DM A niger (1) Bilateral interstitial infiltrates 0.158/<7 Acinetobacter spp. Ventilator associated pneumonia No antifungal 16 Discharged No 5 HCQ, Azithromycin
5 55/M DM/Gas gangrene A flavus/A niger (1) Unilateral consolidation 0.316/54.785 Clostridium perfringens Bacteremia Septic shock, MODS No antifungal 6 Death No 1 HCQ
6 71/M HTN, DM, A flavus (2) Bilateral peripheral patchy infiltrates 0.213/111 S maltophilia ARDS, AKI, Septic shock Voriconazole 35 Discharged Yes 15
7 85/F DM/HTN A niger (1) Bilateral peripheral patchy infiltrates, consolidation 0.136/<7 MDR Acinetobacter spp. Septic shock, AKI, NSTEMI, sinusitis, mastoiditis Voriconazole 17 Death Yes 8 HCQ, Azithromycin, Tocilizumab
8 77/M DM/HTN A fumigatus (1) Bilateral interstitial infiltrates 0.131/<7 S maltophilia Hospital acquired pneumonia No antifungal 14 Discharged No 3 HCQ, Azithromycin, Tocilizumab
9 51/F Atrial myxoma, Recent Stroke A flavus (1) Bilateral peripheral patchy infiltrates, consolidation, unilateral pleural effusion 0.126/<7 P aeruginosa Acute kidney injury Voriconazole 11 Discharged Yes 0 HCQ, Azithromycin

The median age of COVID‐19 patients with CAPA was 71 years (IQR: 24; range 51‐85 years). Three out of five patents were male. The most frequent co‐morbid was diabetes mellitus (88%), and the most common chest radiograph finding was bilateral interstitial infiltrates in all patients. The time duration between admission and positive culture specimen sent for patients with CAPA was median of 8 days (IQR: 9). Out of nine in whom Aspergillus species were isolated from a clinical specimen, seven patients received systemic steroids and five patients received IL‐6 antagonist Tocilizumab. Patients were treated for initial 5‐10 days with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin during the course of illness. Among those with CAPA, four out of five patients had received systemic steroids and three had received tocilizumab. Four out of five patients had COVID‐19 ARDS out of which two required invasive positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) and two patients were managed on non‐invasive ventilation (NIV). All 5 patients with CAPA received antifungals. The overall fatality rate of COVID‐19 patients with aspergillosis was 44% (n = 4) while five patients were discharged. The cause of death was ARDS in all three patients with CAPA, and none of the deaths were directly attributable to CAPA. The median length of stay was 16 days (IQR: 10; Range 6‐35 days) (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Timelines for patients with severe COVID‐19 pneumonia and aspergillosis

4. DISCUSSION

This study demonstrates that invasive aspergillosis is a complication in moderate to severe COVID‐19 patients. The risk factors for severe disease in COVID‐19 are also the risk factors for aspergillosis including underlying co‐morbid like diabetes, prolonged duration of hospitalisation and use of immunosuppressive. 9 ICU aspergillosis is another entity associated with very poor outcomes unless diagnosed and treated early. 10 Three out of five patients with CAPA died in our cohort. This is comparable to the case series from Germany. 2 Although influenza‐associated aspergillosis (IAA) is now a well‐recognised disease entity, reports of CAPA have just begun to emerge from different parts of the world. 2 , 11 COVID‐19 is similar to Influenza with regard to incidence of ARDS but unique with regard to cytokine storm which is being treated with immunomodulators such as IL‐6 antagonist Tocilizumab. Tocilizumab has been associated with risk of severe infections particularly tuberculosis 12 and recurrent allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. 13 Although clinically significant disease requiring treatment was present in five out of nine cases, the beta‐D‐glucan was elevated in only one case and serum galactomannan was not elevated in any of the cases. 2 One hypothesis is that the Aspergillus spp. may not be invading into the blood vessels to cause release of galactomannan. 5 The finding correlates with the limited literature available on COVID‐19‐associated aspergillosis suggesting that serum galactomannan may not be the best marker to differentiate between invasive disease and colonisation and perhaps BAL galactomannan should be considered wherever possible. However, BAL is usually avoided in view of aerosolisation of the virus and high risk of transmissibility to healthcare providers during procedure. Since the radiological findings can overlap between COVID‐19 ARDS and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, seeking microbiological diagnosis is of utmost importance in order to minimise mortality and morbidity due to co‐infection. Our study is limited due to small sample size and data from a single centre. However, it is imperative to report COVID‐19‐associated aspergillosis as the case fatality rates have remained higher than that due to Influenza and may be due to co‐infections particularly in resource‐limited settings.

5. CONCLUSION

This study highlights the need for comparative studies to establish whether there really is an association of CAPA and COVID‐19 and whether COVID‐19 patients should undergo screening for fungal infections if they have certain risk factors.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

All the authors do not have conflict of interests to declare.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION

Nosheen Nasir: Conceptualization (supporting); Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Writing‐original draft (lead); Writing‐review & editing (supporting). Joveria Farooqi: Conceptualization (equal); Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Methodology (lead); Writing‐original draft (equal); Writing‐review & editing (equal). Syed Faisal Mahmood: Conceptualization (equal); Formal analysis (supporting); Methodology (equal); Supervision (supporting); Writing‐original draft (supporting); Writing‐review & editing (supporting). Kauser Jabeen: Conceptualization (lead); Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Methodology (equal); Project administration (lead); Supervision (lead); Writing‐original draft (equal); Writing‐review & editing (lead).

Nasir N, Farooqi J, Mahmood SF, Jabeen K. COVID‐19‐associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) in patients admitted with severe COVID‐19 pneumonia: An observational study from Pakistan. Mycoses. 2020;63:766–770. 10.1111/myc.13135

REFERENCES

  • 1. Mahase E. Covid‐19: WHO declares pandemic because of "alarming levels" of spread, severity, and inaction. BMJ. 2020;368:m1036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Koehler P, Cornely OA, Bottiger BW, et al. COVID‐19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis. Mycoses. 2020;63(6):528‐534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Alanio A, Dellière S, Fodil S, Bretagne S, Mégarbane B. Prevalence of putative invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in critically ill patients with COVID‐19. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8:e48‐e49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. van Arkel ALE, Rijpstra TA, Belderbos HNA, van Wijngaarden P, Verweij PE, Bentvelsen RG. COVID‐19 Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202(1):132‐135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Verweij PE, Gangneux J‐P, Bassetti M, et al. Diagnosing COVID‐19‐associated pulmonary aspergillosis. Lancet Microbe. 2020;1(2):e53‐e55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Delsuc C, Cottereau A, Frealle E, et al. Putative invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in critically ill patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a matched cohort study. Crit Care. 2015;19:421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Schauwvlieghe AFAD, Rijnders BJA, Philips N, et al. Invasive aspergillosis in patients admitted to the intensive care unit with severe influenza: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2018;6(10):782‐792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. World Health Organization . Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection when COVID‐19 is suspected. 2020; 2020. https://www.who.int/publications‐detail/clinical‐management‐of‐severe‐acute‐respiratory‐infection‐when‐novel‐coronavirus‐(ncov)‐infection‐is‐suspected. Accessed May 15, 2020.
  • 9. Vandewoude K, Blot S, Benoit D, Depuydt P, Vogelaers D, Colardyn F. Invasive aspergillosis in critically ill patients: analysis of risk factors for acquisition and mortality. Acta Clin Belg. 2004;59(5):251‐257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Meersseman W, Van Wijngaerden E. Invasive aspergillosis in the ICU: an emerging disease. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33(10):1679‐1681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Blaize M, Mayaux J, Nabet C, et al. Fatal invasive aspergillosis and coronavirus disease in an immunocompetent patient. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(7):1636‐1637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Kherani I, Chin C, Kherani RB, Kherani F. Refractory giant cell arteritis on prednisone and tocilizumab: improvement with subsequent tuberculosis reactivation. Can J Ophthalmol. 2019;54(4):e192‐e194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Honda H, Kida H, Yoshida M, et al. Recurrent allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis treated with etanercept and tocilizumab. Mod Rheumatol. 2011;21(6):660‐664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mycoses are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES