Abstract
Purpose of review:
The purpose of this review is to summarize the current understanding of germline mutations as they contribute to leukemia development and progression. We also discuss how these new insights may help improve clinical management of germline mutations associated leukemia.
Recent findings:
Germline mutations may represent important initial mutations in the development of leukemia where interaction with somatic mutations provide further hits in leukemic progression. In addition, germline mutations may also contribute to leukemogenesis by impacting bone marrow stem cell microenvironment and immune cell development and function.
Summary:
Leukemia is characterized by the clonal expansion of malignant cells secondary to somatic or germline mutations in a variety of genes. Understanding somatic mutations that drive leukemogenesis has drastically improved our knowledge of leukemia biology and led to novel therapeutic strategies. Advances have also been made in identifying germline mutations that may affect leukemic development and progression. This review will discuss the biological and clinical relationship of germline mutations with clonal hematopoiesis, bone marrow microenvironment, and immunity in the progression of leukemia.
Keywords: Germline mutations, Leukemogenesis, Hematopoietic stem cell, Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential, Microenvironment, Antitumor immunity
Introduction
Despite dramatic improvements in therapy for some, leukemia remains a clinical challenge, particularly in older adults for whom the prognosis can be quite dire. Leukemia is characterized by the clonal expansion of malignant cells driven by mutations in a variety of genes (1–6). Our understanding of somatic mutations that drive leukemogenesis has had a profound impact in better understanding leukemia biology and, to some extent, informing therapeutic interventions. Additionally, notable advances have been made in identifying germline mutations which predispose towards the development of hematologic malignancies (7, 8). Of note, several of these germline genes, including TP53 and PTEN, are also targeted in somatic mutations involved in leukemic transformation (9). Importantly though, the penetrance of leukemia in pedigrees that carry a pathogenic variant is incomplete. In contrast, a unique and more indolent form of clonal expansion of hematopoietic cells with specific somatic mutations has been identified and termed clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) (10). While germline mutations are well known to predispose towards the development of solid and hematologic malignancies through cell autonomous effects, this review will discuss the relationship of germline mutations with common CHIP mutations and the bone marrow microenvironment. Moreover, as immune cells are integral in the leukemic microenvironment, we will also discuss the role of germline mutations and clonality in immune evasion and anti-tumor immunity.
Functional Interactions of Germline Mutations with CHIP
Clonal hematopoiesis is an aging associated process where genetically distinct populations of blood cells clonally derived from a single hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell (HSPC) begin to populate the hematopoietic system. While often a benign process, somatic mutations in leukemia-associated genes such as DNA Methyltransferase 3a (DNMT3A), ASXL Transcriptional Regulator 1 (ASXL1), or Ten-Eleven Translocation-2 (TET2), have been well characterized to develop into a condition known as CHIP (11–17, 18*, 19). CHIP is defined as clonal expansion driven by somatic mutations which provide a growth advantage to a subset of HSPCs – at a variant allele fraction ≥ 2% – in the absence of cytopenias and dysplastic hematopoiesis (10, 20*). Moreover, CHIP is identified as a precursor condition, or an indolent pathological state associated with an increased risk of myeloid malignancy (10, 20*). As a benign precursor, CHIP is similar to monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis. Importantly, most individuals who develop CHIP do not develop myeloid malignancy, with only a 0.5% to 1% annual risk, suggesting that additional perturbations are necessary for leukemogenesis (10, 20*).
A better understanding of the relationship of germline mutations and CHIP-associated mutations may elucidate the progression to overt hematological malignancy. Among the common CHIP-associated mutations, germline variants in TET2 have recently been associated with hematologic malignancy. Heterozygous germline TET2 frameshift mutation has been described in families in which select family members developed lymphoma, acute myeloid leukemia (AML), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), and polycythemia vera (21*, 22*, 23). TET family proteins are involved in DNA methylation and play a critical role in normal hematopoiesis including self-renewal of hematopoietic stem cells, lineage commitment, and terminal differentiation on monocytes (24, 25). Mutations in TET2 are found in 20–25% of myelodysplasia syndrome (MDS) and AML and 40–50% of CMML (22*). Interestingly, TET2 mutations have been shown to cooperate with JAK2 and SRSF2 mutations – both of which are less commonly identified CHIP genes – to promote hematologic malignancies (26). Thus, germline and somatic mutations in TET2 cooperate with mutations in other CHIP-associated genes to promote leukemogenesis.
To further understand the relationship of germline and CHIP-associated mutations, analysis of the somatic mutations in individuals with known germline, leukemia-predisposing mutations may provide insight. Germline mutation of the Runt-Related Transcription Factor 1(RUNX1) gene is the cause of Familial Platelet Disorder with Predisposition to Myeloid Malignancy (FPD-MM) (9). Characterized by thrombocytopenia and varying degrees of platelet dysfunction, individuals with FPD-MM are at an increased risk of developing AML, MDS, and T-ALL with a lifetime risk of 30–40% (9, 27). Patients with germline RUNX1 mutations have also been found to have additional mutations in CHIP-associated genes, including but not limited to JAK2, SRSF2, ASXL1, TET2, and DNMT3A (27, 28). Similarly, among 72 individuals with FPD-MM due to germline RUNX1 mutation, somatic mutations in CHIP-associated genes were found in 22% without leukemia and in 40% with myeloid malignancies, including DNMT3A and TET2 (29*). However, comparing somatic mutations in AML patients from those with FPD-MM to those with sporadic disease with at least one somatic RUNX1 variant revealed that individuals with FPD-MM had fewer mutations in DNMT3A, NRAS, SRSF2, and other CHIP-associated genes, suggesting that the early acquisition of RUNX1 mutation may influence which cooperating mutations promote transformation (29*).
GATA binding protein 2 (GATA2) mutations are associated with increased risk of bone marrow failure, MDS and AML (30). A strong association between germline GATA2 and ASXL1 has been described (31, 32, 33*). In patients with germline GATA2 mutations, studies have found that about one third of patients with germline GATA2 mutations also have mutations in ASXL1, with a small percentage of the patient sample having DNMT3A and TET2 mutations (31, 32, 33*). Taken together, though the data remains limited, there appears to be overlap and functional interaction of leukemia predisposition germline mutations with CHIP-associated gene mutations. Nevertheless, many factors affect the ability of CHIP-associated mutations to promote leukemogenesis including HSPC microenvironment and changes to anti-tumor immunity that are simultaneously impacted by germline mutations.
Microenvironmental Impact of Germline Mutations on Leukemogenesis
HSPCs interact with the bone marrow microenvironment (BMME) for normal processes of self-renewal, proliferation, and differentiation (34, 35). Divided into mesenchymal stem cells, pericytes, osteoblastic cells, and endothelial cells, the BMME has more recently been linked to dysregulated hematopoiesis, MDS, and leukemia (34–39, 40, 41). Somatic mutations resulting in the dysregulation of the transcription factor, Forkhead Box C1 (Foxc1), in mesenchymal cells has been associated with increased BM adipocyte populations and decreased Stromal Cell-Derived Factor 1 (CXCL12) expression, which are associated with a poor prognosis in leukemia patients (43). Osteoblasts represent a protective niche as osteoblast ablation has been correlated with accelerated leukemia development and decreased overall survival (44). Endothelial cells sustain angiogenesis and promote leukemia cell adhesion through E-selectin, thereby inducing chemotherapy resistance (42, 46). Immune cells also represent a substantial population in the BMME and will be discussed in the following sections. Despite microenvironmental heterogeneity, genetic alterations, including germline mutations, and epigenetic changes effecting the BMME promote hematopoietic dysregulation (34–36, 45*).
For example, dominant germline mutations in PTPN11 (SHP2) cause about 50% of cases in Noonan syndrome (NS), a developmental disorder associated with an increased risk of leukemia (47). Although these mutations drive leukemogenesis primarily through hyperactivation of the Ras signaling, they can have significant impact on the bone marrow stem cell microenvironment (47). On a molecular level, hyperactivity of mutant SHP2 in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and osteoprogenitors is correlated with increased production of the chemokine CCL3, which recruits monocytes to the vicinity where hematopoietic stem cells also reside (48). Consequently, hematopoietic stem cells are hyperactivated by IL-1β and other proinflammatory cytokines produced by monocytes, accelerating the development of myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) in the setting of NS and leading to donor cell-derived MPN following stem cell transplantation for NS-associated hematological malignancy in the mouse model (48). Another key germline mutation involved in the leukemic progression is TP53. TP53 mutation has been detected in patient bone marrow MSC populations with no other leukemia-specific, cooperating mutation detected (49**). Importantly, TP53 alterations are observed in tumor as well as non-tumor cells in 43.3% of childhood low hypodiploid ALL, suggesting underlying Li-Fraumeni syndrome (50*). While germline mutations in PTPN11 and TP53 may promote the developing hematological malignancy in part by impacting stem cell microenvironment, altered immune cell populations and aberrant anti-tumor immunity directly caused by other germline mutations might be also significant players in leukemic progression.
Germline Mutations Affecting Anti-Tumor Immunity in Leukemia
Impaired immunity and immune tolerance have been identified as a key feature of leukemia (52–54). Indeed, primary immune deficiencies such as ataxia-telangiectasia, Nijmegen breakage syndrome, and autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome are associated with high-risk of hematologic malignancy (51, 56*, 58). The immune system is comprised of the innate and adaptive immune branches. The ability of innate immune cells to present germline-encoded pattern recognition receptors to recognize “non-self” conserved microbial components or, in the context of leukemia, malignant cell clones is key to the adaptive immune response (55). In a functioning immune system, antigen-specific lymphocytes known as T-cells undergo clonal expansion to populate the adaptive immune system and mature into effector cells to induce target cell death or become long-lived central memory cells for sustained adaptive immunity (55). The adaptive immune system also consists of B-cells which serve as antigen-presenting cells that activate T-cells during an immune response (54). Manipulating the adaptive immune response with immunotherapy via immune checkpoint blockade has been promising in solid tumors (57). Thus, understanding the immune landscape in the context of germline mutations associated leukemia is essential to progress immunotherapy as a viable therapeutic option for these leukemia patients.
Germline mutations in cytokine signaling pathways causing primary immune deficiencies can increase risk of developing hematologic malignancies, including lymphoma and leukemia. Germline loss-of-function STAT3 mutations have been associated with immunodeficiency and impaired Th17 differentiation, while germline gain-of-function STAT3 mutations have been associated with early-onset autoimmunity and lymphoproliferation (53). Additionally, a germline mutation in interleukin-2-inducible T-cell kinase (ITK) has been described in a child manifesting B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder, classical Hodgkin lymphoma, and hemophagocytic syndromes (58). Perhaps a more prevalent example of childhood immunodeficiency and high-risk hematological malignancies is found in Down’s syndrome. Significantly, individuals with Down’s syndrome display higher levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-6, IL-22, TNF-α, and MCP-1 (59). In a Down’s syndrome model, germline trisomy 21 has been associated with progenitor B-cell self-renewal in-vitro, maturation defects in-vivo, and the development of CRLF2-rearranged and JAK2 pathway-activated B-cell precursor ALL (59). Overall, germline mutations contributing to the immunosuppressive, pro-inflammatory BMME in individuals with hematological malignancies indicate that modulating cytokine signaling pathways may increase anti-tumor immunity in individuals with lymphoid and myeloid leukemias.
As germline mutations, especially those associated with childhood syndromes, such as TP53 in Li-Fraumeni syndrome, can influence leukemic progression, understanding the clinical significance of germline mutations is key to improving management of leukemia in patients with germline mutations.
Clinical Implications and Management of Leukemia Predisposition
The impact of germline and somatic mutations on cell-autonomous and non-cell-autonomous contributions to leukemogenesis needs to be considered in the management of cancer predisposition. Existing guidelines for management of leukemia predisposition is predicated on careful observation of symptoms, laboratory evaluation, and continued surveillance measures based on the risk of disease progression (5, 60). Others have described their practices of managing patients with clonal hematopoiesis which includes a thorough history and exam, baseline complete blood count, bone marrow evaluation and multidisciplinary care including cardiology (61–63). Additional clinical trials will help demonstrate whether serial assessment of variant allele frequencies using deep sequencing in those with germline leukemia predisposition and/or CHIP can provide the opportunity for detection of clonal evolution. Nevertheless, as germline mutations and their interaction with CHIP can affect disease occurrence, progression, and, in the instance of TP53 mutations in AML, drug response and prognosis, extensive germline mutation sequencing in addition to sequencing of currently known leukemia-associated genes should be considered for patients with or at risk for leukemia (64*).
Management of non-cell-autonomous contributions to leukemogenesis is guided by the underlying defect. For some immunodeficiencies, immunoglobulin therapy may be indicated, although the extent to which this may modify risk of malignancy is not known (65). More severe immune deficiencies require hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) to abrogate the risk of severe infections (e.g. severe combined immunodeficiency) and/or correct hematologic defects (GATA2 deficiency) (66). Indeed, the prospect of pre-emptive HSCT, prior to the onset of disease manifestations, should be considered for highly penetrant diseases such as N-terminal CEBPA mutation and Fanconi Anemia, recognizing that doing so can alter the natural history of disease such that other manifestations, such as solid tumor risk, may become apparent (67–69). Moreover, as a healthy BMME predicts successful HSCT, screening for germline mutations (e.g. TET2) in the BMME should be conducted to address potential germline mutation associated BMME impairment prior to HSCT (63, 70*). As cellular engineering technologies are rapidly evolving, it is conceivable that more refined cellular therapy approaches may be applied for the prevention or treatment of leukemias in those at the highest risk.
Conclusion
Germline mutations, whether by interacting with CHIP mutations or by affecting the BMME, are significant contributors to leukemic initiation and progression. As such, germline mutations represent a clinical challenge in the treatment and management of hematological malignancies. Continued research in the realm of germline mutations’ contribution to leukemogenesis will advance preemptive testing and treatment options for those with germline mutations associated with leukemia and lymphoma. With the advancement of personalized medicine, identifying germline mutations is invaluable to providing holistic care to individuals who may be at risk for hematological malignancies.
Key Points.
Germline mutations may functionally interact with CHIP-associated gene mutations
Germline mutations can contribute to leukemogenesis by disrupting supportive stem cell microenvironment
Germline mutations may also suppress immune cell development and cause a proinflammatory microenvironment to predispose individuals to leukemia
Clinical management is predicated on early detection, appropriate surveillance, and a multidisciplinary approach
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grant HL130995 (to C.K.Q.).
Footnotes
Conflict of interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
References:
- 1.Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60(5):277–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pui CH, Carroll WL, Meshinchi S, Arceci RJ. Biology, Risk Stratification, and Therapy of Pediatric Acute Leukemias: An Update. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Deschler B, Lubbert M. Acute myeloid leukemia: epidemiology and etiology. Cancer. 2006;107(9):2099–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mardis ER, Ding L, Dooling DJ, Larson DE, McLellan MD, Chen K, et al. Recurring mutations found by sequencing an acute myeloid leukemia genome. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(11):1058–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Walter MJ, Shen D, Ding L, Shao J, Koboldt DC, Chen K, et al. Clonal architecture of secondary acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(12):1090–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gu Z, Churchman ML, Roberts KG, Moore I, Zhou X, Nakitandwe J, et al. PAX5-driven subtypes of B-progenitor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Genet. 2019;51(2):296–307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Porter CC. Germ line mutations associated with leukemias. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2016;2016(1):302–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Godley LA, Shimamura A. Genetic predisposition to hematologic malignancies: management and surveillance. Blood. 2017;130(4):424–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bloom M, Maciaszek JL, Clark ME, Pui CH, Nichols KE. Recent advances in genetic predisposition to pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Expert Rev Hematol. 2020;13(1):55–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Steensma DP, Bejar R, Jaiswal S, Lindsley RC, Sekeres MA, Hasserjian RP, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential and its distinction from myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2015;126(1):9–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Busque L, Patel JP, Figueroa ME, Vasanthakumar A, Provost S, Hamilou Z, et al. Recurrent somatic TET2 mutations in normal elderly individuals with clonal hematopoiesis. Nat Genet. 2012;44(11):1179–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Delhommeau F, Dupont S, Della Valle V, James C, Trannoy S, Masse A, et al. Mutation in TET2 in myeloid cancers. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(22):2289–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cai Z, Kotzin JJ, Ramdas B, Chen S, Nelanuthala S, Palam LR, et al. Inhibition of Inflammatory Signaling in Tet2 Mutant Preleukemic Cells Mitigates Stress-Induced Abnormalities and Clonal Hematopoiesis. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;23(6):833–49 e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shlush LI, Zandi S, Mitchell A, Chen WC, Brandwein JM, Gupta V, et al. Identification of pre-leukaemic haematopoietic stem cells in acute leukaemia. Nature. 2014;506(7488):328–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dai YJ, Wang YY, Huang JY, Xia L, Shi XD, Xu J, et al. Conditional knockin of Dnmt3a R878H initiates acute myeloid leukemia with mTOR pathway involvement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(20):5237–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Meyer SE, Qin T, Muench DE, Masuda K, Venkatasubramanian M, Orr E, et al. DNMT3A Haploinsufficiency Transforms FLT3ITD Myeloproliferative Disease into a Rapid, Spontaneous, and Fully Penetrant Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Cancer Discov. 2016;6(5):501–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ernst T, Busch M, Rinke J, Ernst J, Haferlach C, Beck JF, et al. Frequent ASXL1 mutations in children and young adults with chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2018;32(9):2046–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.*.Asada S, Goyama S, Inoue D, Shikata S, Takeda R, Fukushima T, et al. Mutant ASXL1 cooperates with BAP1 to promote myeloid leukaemogenesis. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):2733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; [This study describes the tumor-promoting role of BAP1 and ASXL1 cooperation in leukemic progression.]
- 19.Yang H, Kurtenbach S, Guo Y, Lohse I, Durante MA, Li J, et al. Gain of function of ASXL1 truncating protein in the pathogenesis of myeloid malignancies. Blood. 2018;131(3):328–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.*.Steensma DP. Clinical consequences of clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential. Blood Adv. 2018;2(22):3404–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; [This review comprehensively describes the clinical implications of CHIP as clonally restricted hematopoiesis that predisposes to the development of hematological malignancies.]
- 21.*.Kaasinen E, Kuismin O, Rajamaki K, Ristolainen H, Aavikko M, Kondelin J, et al. Impact of constitutional TET2 haploinsufficiency on molecular and clinical phenotype in humans. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; [This study describes the role of constitutional TET2 haploinsufficiency on the molecular and clinical phenotype in a lymphoma-impacted family.]
- 22.*.Duployez N, Goursaud L, Fenwarth L, Bories C, Marceau-Renaut A, Boyer T, et al. Familial myeloid malignancies with germline TET2 mutation Leukemia. 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; [This study describes a French pedigree harboring a germline TET2 frameshift variant in which three siblings developed myeloid malignancies, including lymphoma. The authors note that TET2 mutations are well-known preleukemic lesions, although TET2 haploinsufficiency alone is not sufficient to trigger malignancy in humans. Thus, the authors suggest the role of TET2 mutations in leukemic predisposition, potentially through CHIP.]
- 23.Schaub FX, Looser R, Li S, Hao-Shen H, Lehmann T, Tichelli A, et al. Clonal analysis of TET2 and JAK2 mutations suggests that TET2 can be a late event in the progression of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2010;115(10):2003–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pan F, Weeks O, Yang FC, Xu M. The TET2 interactors and their links to hematological malignancies. IUBMB Life. 2015;67(6):438–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lio CJ, Yuita H, Rao A. Dysregulation of the TET family of epigenetic regulators in lymphoid and myeloid malignancies. Blood. 2019;134(18):1487–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Solary E, Bernard OA, Tefferi A, Fuks F, Vainchenker W. The Ten-Eleven Translocation-2 (TET2) gene in hematopoiesis and hematopoietic diseases. Leukemia. 2014;28(3):485–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.DiFilippo EC, Coltro G, Carr RM, Mangaonkar AA, Binder M, Khan SP, et al. Spectrum of abnormalities and clonal transformation in germline RUNX1 familial platelet disorder and a genomic comparative analysis with somatic RUNX1 mutations in MDS/MPN overlap neoplasms. Leukemia. 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Churpek JE, Pyrtel K, Kanchi KL, Shao J, Koboldt D, Miller CA, et al. Genomic analysis of germ line and somatic variants in familial myelodysplasia/acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2015;126(22):2484–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.*.Brown AL, Arts P, Carmichael CL, Babic M, Dobbins J, Chong CE, et al. RUNX1-mutated families show phenotype heterogeneity and a somatic mutation profile unique to germline predisposed AML. Blood Adv. 2020;4(6):1131–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; [This study describes familial germline RUNX1 mutations. Importantly, the authors note that germline RUNX1-mutated acute myeloid leukemias have different somatic mutation profiles from the sporadic RUNX1-mutated type.]
- 30.Kallen ME, Dulau-Florea A, Wang W, Calvo KR. Acquired and germline predisposition to bone marrow failure: Diagnostic features and clinical implications. Semin Hematol. 2019;56(1):69–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.West RR, Hsu AP, Holland SM, Cuellar-Rodriguez J, Hickstein DD. Acquired ASXL1 mutations are common in patients with inherited GATA2 mutations and correlate with myeloid transformation. Haematologica. 2014;99(2):276–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bodor C, Renneville A, Smith M, Charazac A, Iqbal S, Etancelin P, et al. Germ-line GATA2 p.THR354MET mutation in familial myelodysplastic syndrome with acquired monosomy 7 and ASXL1 mutation demonstrating rapid onset and poor survival. Haematologica. 2012;97(6):890–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.*.McReynolds LJ, Yang Y, Yuen Wong, Tang J, Zhang Y, Mule MP, et al. MDS-associated mutations in germline GATA2 mutated patients with hematologic manifestations. Leuk Res 2019;76:70–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; [This case study describes an AML patient with a germline GATA2 mutation and its role in luekemogenesis.]
- 34.Morrison SJ, Scadden DT. The bone marrow niche for haematopoietic stem cells. Nature. 2014;505(7483):327–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Li AJ, Calvi LM. The microenvironment in myelodysplastic syndromes: Niche-mediated disease initiation and progression. Exp Hematol. 2017;55:3–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Schepers K, Pietras EM, Reynaud D, Flach J, Binnewies M, Garg T, et al. Myeloproliferative neoplasia remodels the endosteal bone marrow niche into a self-reinforcing leukemic niche. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;13(3):285–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Liu X, Gao X, Zheng S, Wang B, Li Y, Zhao C, et al. Modified nanoparticle mediated IL-12 immunogene therapy for colon cancer. Nanomedicine. 2017;13(6):1993–2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lazzari E, Butler JM. The Instructive Role of the Bone Marrow Niche in Aging and Leukemia. Curr Stem Cell Rep. 2018;4(4):291–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhou HS, Carter BZ, Andreeff M. Bone marrow niche-mediated survival of leukemia stem cells in acute myeloid leukemia: Yin and Yang. Cancer Biol Med. 2016;13(2):248–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Walkley CR, Shea JM, Sims NA, Purton LE, Orkin SH. Rb regulates interactions between hematopoietic stem cells and their bone marrow microenvironment. Cell. 2007;6:1081–1095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Raaijmakers MH, Mukherjee S, Guo S, Scadden DT, et al. Bone progenitor dysfunction induces myelodysplasia and secondary leukaemia. Nature. 2010;464(7290):852–857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Godavarthy PS, Kumar R, Herkt SC, Pereira RS, Hayduk N, Weissenberger ES, et al. The vascular bone marrow niche influences outcome in chronic myeloid leukemia via the E-selectin - SCL/TAL1 - CD44 axis. Haematologica. 2020;105(1):136–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Omatsu Y, Seike M, Sugiyama T, Kume T, Nagasawa T. Foxc1 is a critical regulator of haematopoietic stem/progenitor cell niche formation. Nature. 2014;508(7497):536–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bowers M, Zhang B, Ho Y, Agarwal P, Chen CC, Bhatia R. Osteoblast ablation reduces normal long-term hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal but accelerates leukemia development. Blood. 2015;125(17):2678–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.*.Verma D, Zanetti C, Godavarthy PS, Kumar R, Minciacchi VR, Pfeiffer J, et al. Bone marrow niche-derived extracellular matrix-degrading enzymes influence the progression of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; [This study identifies matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) as an important factor in remodeling of the extracellular matrix (ECM) of the BMME of B-ALL. Moreover, leukemia cell-derived Tnfα induced MMP-9-expression by the BMM promoting B-ALL progression.]
- 46.Testa U, Saulle E, Castelli G, Pelosi E. Endothelial progenitor cells in hematologic malignancies. Stem Cell Investig. 2016;3:26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Tartaglia M, Niemeyer CM, Shannon KM, Loh ML. SHP-2 and myeloid malignancies. Curr Opin Hematol. 2004;11(1):44–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Dong L, Yu WM, Zheng H, Loh ML, Bunting ST, Pauly M, et al. Leukaemogenic effects of Ptpn11 activating mutations in the stem cell microenvironment. Nature. 2016;539(7628):304–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.**.Muller M, Graf R, Kashofer K, Macher S, Wolfler A, Zebisch A, et al. Detection of AML-specific TP53 mutations in bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells cultured under hypoxia conditions. Ann Hematol. 2019;98(8):2019–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; [This study describes the detection of leukemia–specific TP53 mutations in mesodermal ancestors of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells of AML patients which supports the concept of TP53 mutations as early events of acute myeloid leukemogenesis]
- 50.*.Holmfeldt L, Wei L, Diaz-Flores E, et al. The genomic landscape of hypodiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Genet. 2013;45(3):242–252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; [This study details the genomic profiling of 124 hypodiploid ALL cases. Of note, a majority of low-hypodiploid ALL with 32–39 chromosomes are characterized by alterations in TP53 that are commonly present in nontumor cells, implicating the role of germline TP53 mutations in leukemic progression.]
- 51.Holmfeldt L, Wei L, Diaz-Flores E, et al. The genomic landscape of hypodiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Genet. 2013;45(3):242–252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ureshino H, Shindo T, Kimura S. Role of cancer immunology in chronic myelogenous leukemia. Leuk Res. 2020;88:106273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Milner Joshua D., Vogel Tiphanie P., Forbes Lisa, Cooper Megan A., et al. Early-onset lymphoproliferation and autoimmunity caused by germline STAT3 gain-of-function mutations. Blood. 2015; 125(4):591–599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Goswami M, Prince G, Biancotto A, Moir S, Kardava L, Santich BH, et al. Impaired B cell immunity in acute myeloid leukemia patients after chemotherapy. J Transl Med. 2017;15(1):155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Jain A, Pasare C. Innate Control of Adaptive Immunity: Beyond the Three-Signal Paradigm. J Immunol. 2017;198(10):3791–800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.*.Zhang J, Hu X, Wang J, Sahu AD, Cohen D, Song L, et al. Immune receptor repertoires in pediatric and adult acute myeloid leukemia. Genome Med. 2019;11(1):73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; [This study describes the higher clonal expansion of both T cells and B cells in the AML microenvironment. The authors indicate that highly expanded IgA2 B cells found in AML may represent an immunosuppressive microenvironment associated with worse overall survival.]
- 57.Reiss KA, Forde PM, Brahmer JR. Harnessing the power of the immune system via blockade of PD-1 and PD-L1: a promising new anticancer strategy. Immunotherapy. 2014;6(4):459–475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Alme Charlotte, Satwani Prakash, Alobeid Bachir, Bhagat Govind, Kelly Kara. Atypical Clinical Course in Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma: Association With Germline Mutations in Interleukin-2-inducible T-Cell Kinase. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2015;37(7):507–508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Haas OA. Primary Immunodeficiency and Cancer Predisposition Revisited: Embedding Two Closely Related Concepts Into an Integrative Conceptual Framework. Front Immunol. 2019;9:3136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Libby P, Sidlow R, Lin AE, Gupta D, Jones LW, Moslehi J, et al. Clonal Hematopoiesis: Crossroads of Aging, Cardiovascular Disease, and Cancer: JACC Review Topic of the Week. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(4):567–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Porter CC, Druley TE, Erez A, Kuiper RP, Onel K, Schiffman JD, et al. Recommendations for Surveillance for Children with Leukemia-Predisposing Conditions. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(11):e14–e22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Bolton KL, Zehir A, Ptashkin RN, Patel M, Gupta D, Sidlow R, et al. The Clinical Management of Clonal Hematopoiesis: Creation of a Clonal Hematopoiesis Clinic. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2020;34(2):357–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Rücker FG, Schlenk RF, Bullinger L, von Lilienfeld-Toal M, Döhner H, et al. TP53 alterations in acute myeloid leukemia with complex karyotype correlate with specific copy number alterations, monosomal karyotype, and dismal outcome. Blood. 2012. March 1; 119(9):2114–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.*.Naqvi K, Sasaki K, Montalban-Bravo G, Alfonso Pierola A, Yilmaz M, Short N, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential-associated mutations and risk of comorbidities in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Cancer. 2019;125(13):2233–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; [This study discusses a multidisciplinary clinical approach to the management of patients with clonal hematopoiesis and on-going research needed to establish evidence-based clinical care guidelines and intervention strategies for individuals with clonal hematopoiesis.]
- 65.Perez EE, Orange JS, Bonilla F, Chinen J, Chinn IK, Dorsey M, et al. Update on the use of immunoglobulin in human disease: a review of evidence. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;139(3S):S1–S46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Hamilton Kayla V., Maese Luke, Marron Jonathan M., Pulsipher Michael A., Porter Christopher C., and Nichols Kim E.. Stopping Leukemia in Its Tracks: Should Preemptive Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation be Offered to Patients at Increased Genetic Risk for Acute Myeloid Leukemia? J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(24):2098–2104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Khan NE, Rosenberg PS, Alter BP. Preemptive Bone Marrow Transplantation and Event-Free Survival in Fanconi Anemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016;22(10):1888–1892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Dietz AC, Mehta PA, Vlachos A, et al. Current Knowledge and Priorities for Future Research in Late Effects after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Syndromes: Consensus Statement from the Second Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium International Conference on Late Effects after Pediatric Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017;23(5):726–735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Masouridi-Levrat S, Simonetta F, Chalandon Y. Immunological Basis of Bone Marrow Failure after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Front Immunol. 2016;7:362 Published 2016 Sep 16. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.*.Zebisch A., Winter G., Kashofer K. et al. The role of germline mutation profiling in the selection of related donors for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; [This Nature correspondence describes an application of germline mutation profiling in the context of HSCT, which can be expanded upon for use in screening for a leukemia setting.]
