Abstract
Cat fleas (Ctenocephalides felis) are the most commonly recognised ectoparasites of domestic pets globally and are frequently implicated in the transmission of a variety of zoonotic vector-borne pathogens. The aim of the present study was to investigate the morphological and molecular identity of fleas parasitising cats and dogs in Northern Laos and screen them for a range of bacterial pathogens. Fleas (n = 120) were collected from dogs and cats and morphologically identified as Ctenocephalides felis (115/120), Ctenocephalides orientis (4/120) and Pulex irritans (1/120). Molecular barcoding using the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene (cox1) was used to confirmed species identity of 21 selected fleas. The cat flea (C. felis) was the most dominant flea identified. Rickettsia and Bartonella spp. DNA was detected in 21/21 and 7/21 samples, respectively, via a multiplex real-time PCR targeting gltA and ssrA. Sequencing of the seven Bartonella-positive samples and ten Rickettsia-positive samples revealed Bartonella clarridgeiae, Bartonella rochalimae, Rickettsia felis and Rickettsia sp. genotype RF2125 DNA. Anaplasma platys DNA was detected in a single C. felis after 20 of the 21 DNA samples were screened using a commercial PCR panel for vector-borne pathogens. The detection of a range of bacterial pathogens in fleas from owned cats and dogs in Northern Laos provides further evidence to the importance of these ectoparasites as vectors of zoonotic diseases in the region.
Keywords: Microbiology, Zoology, Veterinary medicine, Infectious disease, Parasitology, Diagnostics, Anaplasma, cox1, gltA, omp-A, Real-time PCR, ssrA
Microbiology; Zoology; Veterinary Medicine; Infectious Disease; Parasitology; Diagnostics; Anaplasma; cox1; gltA; omp-A; Real-time PCR; ssrA
1. Introduction
Fleas in the genus Ctenocephalides are agents of a variety of important zoonotic pathogens, including Rickettsia and Bartonella bacterial species (Eisen and Gage, 2012; Lawrence et al., 2019; Varagnol et al., 2009). Rickettsia typhi and Rickettsia felis cause murine typhus and flea-borne spotted fever, respectively, and Bartonella henselae is responsible for cat scratch disease (Eisen and Gage, 2012; Kernif et al., 2012; Varagnol et al., 2009). These vector-borne diseases are globally distributed and yet often overlooked in developing countries where access to medical care is limited. Such is the case in the Lao People's Democratic Republic where rickettsial infections have been identified in 27% of patients suffering from undifferentiated febrile illnesses, and where three molecularly-confirmed R. felis infections were documented between 2003-2011 (Dittrich et al., 2014; Phongmany et al., 2006).
Despite the human health implications, very little work has been conducted on the molecular identity of fleas and the pathogens they carry in Northern Laos, with previous studies relying on morphological identification alone (Kernif et al., 2012; Parola et al., 2003; Varagnol et al., 2009). The limited data available suggests that fleas in the genus Ctenocephalides from dogs and cats in Lao PDR are the cat flea (Ctenocephalides felis), the dog flea (Ctenocephalides canis), and the Oriental cat flea (Ctenocephalides orientis) (Kernif et al., 2012; Lawrence et al., 2019; Varagnol et al., 2009). The morphological differentiation of Ctenocephalides spp., particularly C. orientis and C. canis, requires clarification of the specimens in order to observe obscure anatomical features. Molecular barcoding of the cox1 gene provides a straightforward alternative that has been proven to unambigiously differentiate these species (Lawrence et al., 2019).
The aim of this study was to unambiguously confirm the identity of fleas found on owned dogs and cats in Northern Laos via molecular barcoding of the cox1 gene and to provide further evidence of their significance to human health by screening the fleas for variety of vector-borne disease pathogens with a focsus on Bartonella and Rickettsia species.
2. Material and methods
2.1. Sample collection and species identification
Fleas were opportunistically collected from two cats and seven dogs across three provinces (Xayabouli, Xieng Khouang and Luang Prabang) in Northern Laos either upon visits to the local veterinary clinic for routine vaccinations (Luang Prabang) or during livestock disease surveillance activities in the 2019 dry season. With the owner's consent the samples were collected by hand and immediately placed in Eppendorf tubes with ≥96% (v/v) ethanol for transport to the Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology, The University of Sydney, Australia for morphological and molecular analysis.
All fleas were morphologically identified to the species level using a stereo microscope (Olympus, Australia) and published keys (Hopkins and Rothschild, 1953). Total DNA was extracted from selected individual voucher specimens (n = 21; from a maximum of three fleas per animal and at least one flea of each species) using the Isolate Genomic DNA Kit (Bioline, Australia) into a final volume of 100 μL and the exoskeleton preserved as previously described, before being clarified in KOH, dehydrated in an ethanol series and slide-mounted in Euparal for further identification to the subspecies level (Lawrence et al., 2014).
The morphological identity of each flea was confirmed molecularly via amplification of the mitochondrial encoded cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (cox1) as previously described (Lawrence et al., 2014). Unambiguous PCR products were sequenced at Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, Korea). Sequences were assembled, aligned with related sequences and analysed using CLC Main Workbench 6.9.1 (CLC bio, Denmark) before being deposited in GenBank (National Centre for Biotechnology Information, NCBI) under the following Accession Numbers: MT372307-MT372327.
2.2. Molecular detection and speciation of vector-borne pathogens including Rickettsia and Bartonella spp.
Twenty of the 21 samples were screened for vector-borne pathogens using a commercially available multiplex-tandem (MT) small animal anaemia PCR panel on the corresponding mini-plex 12 system (R910738, AusDiagnostics Pty. Ltd., Australia) as per the manufacturers’ instructions. The assay is an automated two-step nested PCR assay for the simultaneous detection of Anaplasma platys, Babesia vogeli, Babesia gibsoni, Bartonella spp., Mycoplasma haemofelis, Mycoplasma haemocanis, Candidatus Mycoplasma haematoparvum and Mycoplasma haemominutum and consists of a short (10-cycle) conventional PCR followed by a second longer SYBR-based qPCR for the detection of each of the pathogens listed (AusDiagnostics Pty. Ltd., Australia). The assay was run using 10 μL undiluted samples. Each run included controls to detect PCR inhibition (SPIKE) and sample adequacy control (ANONO) as per the recommended protocol (AusDiagnostics Pty. Ltd., Australia).
A TaqMan probe real-time PCR for Rickettsia and Bartonella species targeting the citrate synthase (gltA) gene and ssrA gene, respectively, was then used to further screen the samples for vector-borne pathogens (Diaz et al., 2012; Stenos et al., 2005). The reactions were run in duplicate in a total volume of 20 μL, with SensiFAST Probe No-ROX Kit (BioLine, Australia) and 2 μL template DNA. Real-time PCRs were run on CFX96 TouchTM Real-Time PCR Detection System (BioRad, Australia) and analysed using the corresponding CFX Maestro 1.0 software (BioRad, Australia) as previously described (Šlapeta and Šlapeta, 2016). Results were considered positive if both repeats yielded cycle threshold (Ct) values <36.00. Suspect positive results were determined when one or more repeats yielded Ct values ≥36.00 and samples were considered negative if neither repeat crossed the threshold (Ct > 40). Positive Bartonella results were sent to Macrogen for sequencing (Macrogen Ltd., Seoul, South Korea). Samples considered either positive or suspect positive for Rickettsia spp. were further identified via a pair of conventional nested PCRs targeting the outer membrane protein A (ompA) gene and gltA (Šlapeta and Šlapeta, 2016; Stenos et al., 2005). Unambiguous PCR products were sequenced at Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, Korea) before being assembled using CLC Main Workbench 6.9.1 (CLC bio, Denmark). New sequences were deposited in GenBank under the following Accession Numbers: MT394897-MT394913.
3. Results and discussion
A total of 120 fleas were collected from seven dogs and two cats in Northern Lao PDR in 2019, of which 21 were selected for molecular investigation (Table 1). Morphological identification revealed 115 (95.8%), four (3.3%) and one (0.8%) specimens of Ctenocephaides felis, Ctenocephalides orientis and Pulex irritans, respectively. Molecular barcoding at the cox1 gene confirmed 16 (76.2%) C. felis, four (19.1%) C. orientis and one (4.8%) P. irritans (Table 1). All 16 cox1 partial sequences from C. felis were 100% identical to each other and 100% identical to fleas from Hong Kong (KY417923), India (KX467335) and Thailand (KF684866), thus demonstrating that C. felis Clade 3:Tropical I (Lawrence et al., 2019) dominates dogs and cats in Lao PDR. This is in contrast to two previous studies from Lao PDR that relied on morphological keys alone to identify fleas on dogs and a cat, which suggested the dominance of C. orientis over C. felis (Varagnol et al., 2009; Kernif et al., 2012). No C. canis were identified in the current study, confirming our previous finding that C. canis is rare or absent from South East Asia (Lawence et al., 2019). We recommend the routine confirmation of morphologically identified C. canis/C. orientis using a cox1 DNA approach, because it is possible that past and current records of C. canis are misidentified C. orientis (Colella et al., 2020; Lawrence et al., 2014, 2019).
Table 1.
Identifier | Host | Locality in Lao PDR | C. felis | C. orientis | P. irritans | Samples for DNA analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P61/19-A | Canis familiaris | B. Nam Tuan, Xayabouli | 1 | 2 | 0 | P61/19-A1 (F), A2 (F), A3 (M) |
P61/19-B | Felis catus | SK Clinic, Luang Prabang | 1 | 0 | 0 | P61/19-B1 (F) |
P61/19-C | Canis familiaris | B. Konekham, Luang Prabang | 22 | 0 | 0 | P61/19-C1 (M), C2 (M), C3 (F) |
P61/19-D | Canis familiaris | B. Soynafar, Xieng Khouang | 1 | 1 | 1 | P61/19-D1 (M), D2 (F), D3 (M) |
P61/19-E | Felis catus | B. Nong, Xieng Khouang | 6 | 0 | 0 | P61/19-E1 (F), E2 (F), E3 (M) |
P61/19-F | Canis familiaris | SK Clinic, Luang Prabang | 1 | 0 | 0 | P61/19-F1 (F) |
P61/19-G | Canis familiaris | SK Clinic, Luang Prabang | 1 | 0 | 0 | P61/19-G1 (F) |
P61/19-H | Canis familiaris | B. Soynafar, Xieng Khouang | 4 | 1 | 0 | P61/19-H1 (F), H2 (F), H3 (F) |
P61/19-I | Canis familiaris | DLF Lab, Luang Prabang | 78 | 0 | 0 | P61/19-I1 (F), I2 (F), I3 (M) |
The cox1 partial sequences from four C. orientis were 100% identical to each other and 100% identical to cox1 of C. orientis from China (MG586605), Thailand (MG586338) and Bhutan (MG586534). The cox1 sequences were identical to those previously identified in Lao PDR, and according to standardized cox1 haplotype names (Lawrence et al., 2019), the C. felis and C. orientis in the current study correspond to h2 (MG586362) and h4 (MG586363), respectively. The cox1 partial sequence from the single Pulex irritans was 100% identical to cox1 from P. irritans in New Zealand (KY048351), Iran (MF380391) and Spain (LT797470). This study, as well as the previous studies (Kernif et al., 2012; Varagnol et al., 2009), was based on a small number of examined animals and more sampling of dogs and cats will be required to draw further conclusions on the apparent lack of within-species genetic diversity. For example, extensive sampling across dogs and cats in Australia demonstrated the presence of three C. felis haplogroups with distinct ecological preferences (Crkvencic and Šlapeta, 2019; Šlapeta et al., 2011).
The MT-PCR panel used to simultaneously detect eight different anaemia-causing pathogens of dogs and cats revealed the presence of A. platys DNA in a single (5%, 1/20) flea, C. felis (P61/19-C2), collected from a dog in Luang Prabang Province. Although this is an interestesting finding, further investigation is needed to better understand the role of fleas in the epidemiology of A. platys, which is currently poorly understood (Carrade et al., 2009). The panel detected Bartonella spp. DNA in half of the fleas tested (10/20), and all three C. felis samples collected from one of the two cats sampled tested positive for Bartonella DNA (P61/19-E1 to E3) (Table S1). All of the fleas tested (n = 20) were negative for the remaining targets. While there is a lack of information available regarding the diversity of vector-borne pathogens in fleas and their companion animal hosts in Lao PDR, a study of canine vector-borne pathogens in 101 semi-domesticated dogs in Cambodia revealed a high prevalence of B. vogeli (32.7%), M. haemocanis (9.9%) and Candidatus Mycoplasma haematoparvum (2.9%), none of which were detected in the current study (Inpankaew et al., 2016). These differences might be attributed to the limited sample size of the current study and provides further evidence towards increased surveillance of vector-borne diseases within ectoparasites and their mammalian hosts in Lao PDR. Further work within Southeast Asia is needed to refine our understanding of vector borne disease and arthropods parasitising dogs and cats (Colella et al., 2020).
We then screened all 21 fleas for the presence of Bartonella and Rickettsia spp. DNA using a multiplexed real-time PCR assay for the simultaneous detection of both pathogens (Table 2). Seven (7/21) samples were considered at least suspect positive (Ct values <40.00) for both targets, one of which was from the single Pulex irritans sample and six (6/20) Ctenocephalides spp. DNA samples were positive for ssrA Bartonella spp. DNA. The ssrA DNA sequences from C. felis (n = 6) were 100% identical to each other and to ssrA from a Bartonella clarridgeiae strain Houston-2 (JN982716). This finding is in alignment with earlier work identifying Bartonella spp. in Lao PDR, although is higher than was previously detected (5/54 of Ctenocephalides spp.) further south on the Thai-Myanmar border (Angelakis et al., 2009; Parola et al., 2003; Varagnol et al., 2009). All B. clarridgeiae positive samples were from C. felis, while no Bartonella spp. DNA was detected in any of the four C. orientis samples. The Bartonella spp. DNA sequence amplified from the total DNA of the single P. irritans sample showed 100% similarity to ssrA from Bartonella rochalimae type strain BMGH (JN029797), which is the first time this species has been detected in Laos.
Table 2.
Identifier | Host | Flea species | Number of fleas tested |
Number of samples PCR positive |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rickettsia | Bartonella | ||||
P61/19-A | Canis familaris | Ctenocephalides felis | 1 | 1/1 | 0/1 |
Ctenocephalides orientis | 2 | 2/2∗ | 0/2 | ||
P61/19-B | Felis catus | Ctenocephalides felis | 1 | 1/1∗∗ | 0/1 |
P61/19-C | Canis familaris | Ctenocephalides felis | 3 | 3/3∗∗ | 0/3 |
P61/19-D | Canis familaris | Ctenocephalides felis | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1∗∗∗ |
Ctenocephalides orientis | 1 | 1/1 | 0/1 | ||
Pulex irritans | 1 | 1/1∗∗ | 1/1∗∗∗∗ | ||
P61/19-E | Felis catus | Ctenocephalides felis | 3 | 3/3∗∗ | 2/3∗∗∗ |
P61/19-F | Canis familaris | Ctenocephalides felis | 1 | 1/1∗∗ | 1/1∗∗∗ |
P61/19-G | Canis familaris | Ctenocephalides felis | 1 | 1/1∗∗ | 1/1∗∗∗ |
P61/19-H | Canis familaris | Ctenocephalides felis | 2 | 2/2 | 0/2 |
Ctenocephalides orientis | 1 | 1/1∗∗ | 0/1 | ||
P61/19-I | Canis familaris | Ctenocephalides felis | 3 | 3/3∗∗ | 1/3∗∗∗ |
All (20/20) Ctenocephalides spp. DNA samples were gltA Rickettsia spp. qPCR positive and negative controls remained negative, ruling out potential cross-contamination. DNA from nine fleas was further tested using a nested PCR targeting gltA and ompA genes for additional Rickettsia spp. identification. DNA sequencing of the PCR products confirmed that the DNA from C. orientis (P61/19-A1) 100% matched gltA DNA from Rickettsia sp. genotype RF2125 (KX431979), which was initially detected along the Thai-Myanmar border (Parola et al., 2003). At ompA the P61/19-A1 sequence was 100% identical to Rickettsia sp. genotype RF2125 (KP256359) from C. orientis from India. The gltA and ompA from the remaining fleas (seven C. felis, one C. orientis and one P. irritans) matched 100% with sequences from the reference genome of R. felis (CP000053). Such a high prevalence of R. felis in the current study is in agreement with other findings from Lao PDR and adds further evidence to the importance of this pathogen as a cause of undifferentiated febrile illnesses in human patients (Dittrich et al., 2014; Kernif et al., 2012; Phongmany et al., 2006; Varagnol et al., 2009).
This study presents the first application of molecular techniques for the identification of fleas and the pathogens they carry in Lao PDR and suggests that both dogs and cats are important reservoirs of known zoonotic pathogens, specifically Bartonella and Rickettsia spp. These findings, and the abundance of R. felis in particular, have implications for the management of malaria and dengue-negative febrile patients and support the use doxycycline when more extensive diagnostic services and medical care is unavailable (Dittrich et al., 2014; Phongmany et al., 2006; Syhavong et al., 2010).
Declarations
Author contribution statement
Nichola E.D. Calvani: Conceived and designed the experiments; Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Wrote the paper.
Liam Bell, Abigail Carney, Carolina De La Fuente, Tori Stragliotto, Mikala Tunstall: Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data.
Jan Šlapeta: Conceived and designed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data; Wrote the paper.
Funding statement
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
No additional information is available for this paper.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The following is the supplementary data related to this article:
References
- Angelakis E., Khamphoukeo K., Grice D., Newton P.N., Roux V., Aplin K., Raoult D., Rolain J.M. Molecular detection of Bartonella species in rodents from the Lao PDR. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2009;15:95–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02177.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carrade D.D., Foley J.E., Borjesson D.L., Sykes J.E. Canine granulocytic anaplasmosis: a review. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2009;23:1129–1141. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2009.0384.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Colella V., Nguyen V.L., Tan D.Y., Lu N., Fang F., Zhijuan Y., Wang J., Liu X., Chen X., Dong J., Nurcahyo W., Hadi U.K., Venturina V., Tong K.B.Y., Tsai Y., Taweethavonsawat P., Tiwananthagorn S., Le T.Q., Bui K.L., Watanabe M., Rani P.A.M.A., Annoscia G., Beugnet F., Otranto D., Halos L. Zoonotic vectorborne pathogens and ectoparasites of dogs and cats in Eastern and Southeast Asia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020;26:1221–1233. doi: 10.3201/eid2606.191832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crkvencic N., Šlapeta J. Climate change models predict southerly shift of the cat flea (Ctenocephalides felis) distribution in Australia. Parasites Vectors. 2019;12:137. doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3399-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Diaz M.H., Bai Y., Malania L., Winchell J.M., Kosoy M.Y. Development of a novel genus-specific real-time PCR assay for detection and differentiation of Bartonella species and genotypes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012;50:1645–1649. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06621-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dittrich S., Phommasone K., Anantatat T., Panyanivong P., Slesak G., Blacksell S.D., Dubot-Peres A., Castonguay-Vanier J., Stenos J., Newton P.N., Paris D.H. Rickettsia felis infections and comorbid conditions, Laos, 2003-2011. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014;20:1402. doi: 10.3201/eid2008.131308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eisen R.J., Gage K.L. Transmission of flea-borne zoonotic agents. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2012;57:61–82. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-120710-100717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hopkins G.H.E., Rothschild M. Trustees of the British Museum; London: 1953. An Illustrated Catalogue of the Rothschild Collection of Fleas (Siphonaptera) in the British Museum (Natural History): with Keys and Short Descriptions for the Identification of Families, Genera, Species and Subspecies. [Google Scholar]
- Inpankaew T., Hii S.F., Chimnoi W., Traub R.J. Canine vector-borne pathogens in semi-domesticated dogs residing in northern Cambodia. Parasites Vectors. 2016;9:6. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1552-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kernif T., Socolovschi C., Wells K., Lakim M.B., Inthalad S., Slesak G., Boudebouch N., Beaucournu J.-C., Newton P.N., Raoult D., Parola P. Bartonella and Rickettsia in arthropods from the Lao PDR and from Borneo, Malaysia. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2012;35:51–57. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2011.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lawrence A.L., Brown G.K., Peters B., Spielman D.S., Morin-Adeline V., Šlapeta J. High phylogenetic diversity of the cat flea (Ctenocephalides felis) at two mitochondrial DNA markers. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2014;28:330–336. doi: 10.1111/mve.12051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lawrence A.L., Webb C.E., Clark N.J., Halajian A., Mihalca A.D., Miret J., D'Amico G., Brown G., Kumsa B., Modrý D., Šlapeta J. Out-of-Africa, human-mediated dispersal of the common cat flea, Ctenocephalides felis: the hitchhiker’s guide to world domination. Int. J. Parasitol. 2019;49:321–336. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2019.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parola P., Sanogo O., Lerdthusnee K., Zeaiter Z., Chauvancy G., Gonzalez J., Miller R., Telford, Wongsrichanalai C., Raoult D. Identification of Rickettsia spp. and Bartonella spp. in fleas from the Thai-Myanmar border. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2003;990:173–181. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07359.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Phongmany S., Rolain J.M., Phetsouvanh R., Blacksell S., Soukkhaseum V., Rasachack B., Phiasakha K., Soukkhaseum S., Frichithavong K., Chu V., Keolouangkhot V., Martinez-Aussel B., Chang K., Newton P. Rickettsial infections and fever, Vientiane, Laos. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2006;12:256–262. doi: 10.3201/eid1202.050900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Šlapeta J., King J., McDonell D., Malik R., Homer D., Hannan P., Emery D. The cat flea (Ctenocephalides f. felis) is the dominant flea on domestic dogs and cats in Australian veterinary practices. Vet. Parasitol. 2011;180:383–388. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.03.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Šlapeta Š., Šlapeta J. Molecular identity of cat fleas (Ctenocephalides felis) from cats in Georgia, USA carrying Bartonella clarridgeiae, Bartonella henselae and Rickettsia sp. RF2125. Vet. Parasitol.: Reg. Stud. Rep. 2016;3–4:36–40. doi: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2016.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stenos J., Graves S.R., Unsworth N.B. A highly sensitive and specific real-time PCR assay for the detection of spotted fever and typhus group Rickettsiae. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2005;73:1083–1085. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Syhavong B., Rasachack B., Smythe L., Rolain J.-M., Roque-Afonso A.-M., Jenjaroen K., Soukkhaserm V., Phongmany S., Phetsouvanh R., Soukkhaserm S., Thammavong T., Mayxay M., Blacksell S.D., Barnes E., Parola P., Dussaix E., Raoult D., Humphreys I., Klenerman P., White N.J. The infective causes of hepatitis and jaundice amongst hospitalised patients in Vientiane, Laos. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2010;104:475–483. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2010.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Varagnol M., Parola P., Jouan R., Beaucournu J.C., Rolain J.M., Raoult D. First detection of Rickettsia felis and Bartonella clarridgeiae in fleas from Laos. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2009;15:334–335. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02272.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.