Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2020 Jul 16;15(7):e0236122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236122

Predictors of hospital expenses and hospital stay among patients undergoing total laryngectomy: Cost effectiveness analysis

Ming-Hsien Tsai 1,2,3, Hui-Ching Chuang 1,2, Yu-Tsai Lin 1,2, Hui Lu 1, Fu-Min Fang 2,4, Tai-Lin Huang 2,5, Tai-Jan Chiu 2,5, Shau-Hsuan Li 2,5, Chih-Yen Chien 1,2,6,*
Editor: Giovanni Cammaroto7
PMCID: PMC7365401  PMID: 32673371

Abstract

Objective

To determine the predictive factors of postoperative hospital stay and total hospital medical cost among patients who underwent total laryngectomy.

Methods

A total of 213 patients who underwent total laryngectomy in a tertiary referral center for tumor ablation were enrolled retrospectively between January 2009 and May 2018. Statistical analyses including Pearson's chi-squared test were used to determine whether there was a significant difference between each selected clinical factors and outcomes. The outcomes of interest including postoperative length of hospital stay and inpatient total medical cost. Logistic regression analyses were performed to reveal the relationship between clinical factors and postoperative length of hospital stay or total inpatient medical cost.

Results

Preoperative radiotherapy (p = 0.007), method of wound closure (p < 0.001), postoperative serum albumin level (p = 0.025), and postoperative serum hemoglobin level (p = 0.04) were significantly associated with postoperative hospital stay in univariate analysis. Postoperative hypoalbuminemia (odds ratio [OR]: 2.477; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.189–5.163; p = 0.015) and previous radiotherapy history (OR 2.194; 95% CI: 1.228–3.917; p = 0.008) are independent predictors of a longer postoperative hospital stay in multiple regression analysis. With respect to total inpatient medical cost, method of wound closure (p < 0.001), preoperative serum albumin level (p = 0.04), postoperative serum albumin level (p < 0.001), and history of liver cirrhosis (p = 0.037) were significantly associated with total inpatient medical cost in univariate analysis. Postoperative hypoalbuminemia (OR: 6.671; 95% CI: 1.927–23.093; p = 0.003) and microvascular free flap reconstruction (OR: 5.011; 95% CI: 1.657–15.156; p = 0.004) were independent predictors of a higher total inpatient medical cost in multiple regression analysis.

Conclusions

Postoperative albumin status is a significant factor in predicting prolonged postoperative hospital stay and higher inpatient medical cost among patients who undergo total laryngectomy. In this cohort, the inpatient medical cost was 48% higher and length of stay after surgery was 35% longer among hypoalbuminemia patients.

Introduction

Current treatment of locally advanced laryngeal cancer/hypopharyngeal cancer has gradually evolved to the strategy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT). However, total laryngectomy still plays a role in primary advanced T4 laryngeal/hypopharyngeal cancer, in persistent or recurrent tumors after primary radiation (RT) for salvage purposes, or in a non-functional larynx after previous treatment [13]. Postoperative wound complications and prolonged hospital stay are important issues in primary and salvage total laryngectomy (TL) [4, 5]. When postoperative major wound complications occur among patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), it delays adjuvant therapy, prolongs hospital stay, increases medical expense, and induces a higher risk of psychological distress among patients. There are several factors related to wound complications, including previous history of CRT/RT, poor nutrition status, anemia, neck dissection, and tumor stage. Currently, it will be worthwhile to realize the factors about the prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS) and higher total inpatient medical cost among patients undergoing total laryngectomy. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the predictive factors of postoperative prolonged hospital LOS and higher inpatient medical cost among patients undergoing total laryngectomy.

Materials and methods

Study population

Patients who underwent total laryngectomy with or without microvascular free flap reconstruction were enrolled retrospectively from the institutional cancer database between January 2009 and May 2018 in Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial hospital, Taiwan. Free flap transfer for pharyngeal defect reconstruction after total laryngectomy would be performed if pharyngeal defect couldn’t primarily close without tension. Patients who received partial laryngectomy or partial laryngopharyngectomy or patient didn’t receive total laryngectomy surgical procedure in our hospital would be excluded from our study. Treatment was primarily based on the American National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines.

Peri-operative clinical variables of interest were collected, including age; sex; performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score); primary tumor location and histology; body mass index (BMI); pre-operative serum hemoglobin; pre- and post-operative serum albumin; post-operative serum hemoglobin; past medical history, including diabetes mellitus and liver cirrhosis; prior interventions such as RT and CRT; and reason for TL (i.e., primary tumor, salvage treatment for persistent or recurrent cancer, or non-functional larynx). Operative details, including completion of neck dissection(s) and method of pharyngeal closure (primary closure, use of free tissue reconstruction), were also included. Post-operative wound complications, LOS, and inpatient medical cost were also reviewed.

Variables and outcomes

Patients were retrospectively enrolled according to the following clinical characteristics: gender, age, primary tumor site, post-operative wound condition, length of hospital stay, and total medical cost of this hospitalization. BMI and circulatory laboratory data, including serum hemoglobin and serum albumin, were regularly measured within 1 week before the surgery. Postoperative serum hemoglobin is defined as the serum hemoglobin level collected the morning after the surgery. Postoperative serum albumin is defined as the serum albumin level collected the morning after the surgery. Anemia is defined as serum hemoglobin level < 13 g/dL. Hypoalbuminemia is defined as serum albumin level < 3.5 g/dL. Patients with liver cirrhosis presenting as Child-Pugh C classification were excluded from analysis. Major postoperative wound infection is defined as a postoperative recipient-site wound condition that necessitated wound debridement in the operating room. Length of hospital stay after surgery is defined as the period between the operation and discharge from the ward in this study.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0 software (SPSS/IBM, Inc., Chicago, IL). The endpoints of this study included major postoperative wound infection, length of hospital stay after surgery, and inpatient total medical cost of this hospitalization. A mean and median approach was applied to select appropriate thresholds for hospital stay and medical cost. Pearson’s chi-squared test was used to determine whether there was a significant difference between each selected clinical factor and the outcome we were interested in, such as postoperative major wound infection, postoperative length of hospital stay, and inpatient total medical cost. Logistic regression analyses were performed to reveal the relationship between postoperative length of hospital stay or total inpatient medical cost and clinical factors. The estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each independent factor. To compare the central tendency of hospital stay of the lower postoperative albumin group versus the higher postoperative albumin group, as well as their medical costs, the Mann–Whitney U test was applied. A 2-tailed p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics and Human Clinical Trial Committees at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (Ethical Application Reference number:201900875B0). Patients’ consent to review their medical records was not required by this hospital’s committees because the patient data remained anonymous in this study.

Results

A total of 213 patients were enrolled in this study. The clinical characteristics of the study patients are summarized in Table 1. The patients’ median age was 58 years (range: 35–88). The population included 201 (94.4%) male patients and 12 (5.6%) female patients. The ECOG performance status score in our cohort were all 0–1. The average BMI in this population was 21.86 kg/m2 (range: 14.2–32.83). The median length of hospital stay after surgery was 18 days (range: 7–70). The mean length of stay after surgery was 22.48 days, with a standard deviation of 12.49 days (Fig 1). The average total inpatient medical cost was 378,967 New Taiwan dollars (NTD) (range: 121,275–1,192,203 NTD ≈ 4,016–39,477 U.S. dollars ≈ 3,567–35,065 EUR (1 U.S. dollar is roughly equal to 30.2 NTD; 1 Euro is roughly equal to 34.0 NTD, according to the Bank of Taiwan, as of June 3, 2020).

Table 1. Clinicopathological characteristics of 213 patients underwent total laryngectomy.

Characteristics Value %
Age Median(range), yr
Sex Male 201 94.4
Female 12 5.6
BMI a Average (range), Kg/m2 21.86 (14.2 ~ 32.83)
Median hospital length of stay (range), days 26 (10 ~ 107)
Median postoperative hospital length of stay (range), days 18 (7 ~ 70)
Average of total inpatient medical cost (NTD b) 378,967 (121,275 ~ 1,192,203)
Average preoperative serum hemoglobin (range), g/dL 12.901 (7.70 ~ 17.80)
Average postoperative serum hemoglobin (range), g/dL 11.637 (8.35 ~ 15.40)
Average preoperative serum albumin (range), g/dL 4.075 (2.70 ~ 4.95)
Average postoperative serum albumin (range), g/dL 3.162 (2.00 ~ 4.20)
Diabetes mellitus 27 12.7
Liver cirrhosis 15 7.0
Salvage surgery * No 107 50.2
Yes 102 47.9
Preoperative radiotherapy No 126 59.2
Yes 87 40.8
Cancer location Oropharynx 8 3.8
Hypopharynx 112 52.6
Larynx 91 42.7
Thyroid 2 0.9
Neck dissection No 26 12.2
Ipsilateral 102 47.8
Bilateral 85 40.0
Reason of surgery Primary treatment 107 50.2
Residual tumor 56 26.3
Recurrent tumor 46 21.6
Non-functional 4 1.9
Wound closure Primary closure 48 22.5
Free flap reconstruction 165 77.5
Design of free flap reconstruction Patch on 101 47.4
Tubing 64 30.1
Postoperative major wound infection 57

aBMI: Body mass index

bNTD: New Taiwan dollars; 1 U.S. dollar = 30.2 NTD (according to the Bank of Taiwan, as of June 3, 2020)

* not include non-functional surgery

Fig 1. Variability in length of hospital stay.

Fig 1

The average preoperative serum hemoglobin level was 12.901 g/dL (range: 7.7–17.8). The average postoperative serum hemoglobin level was 11.637 g/dL (range: 8.35–15.4). The average preoperative serum albumin level was 4.075 g/dL (range: 2.7–4.95). The average postoperative serum albumin level was 3.1 g/dL (range: 1.9–4.3). In this cohort, 27 patients (12.7%) had type II diabetes mellitus, and 15 patients (7.0%) had liver cirrhosis (14 patients had Child class A liver cirrhosis; the other patient had Child class B liver cirrhosis according to the Child-Pugh score).

The most common tumor subsite was the hypopharynx (n = 112, 52.6%), followed by the larynx (n = 91, 42.7%), base of tongue (n = 8, 3.8%), and thyroid (n = 2, 0.9%). All base of tongue cancers in this cohort were p16-negative tumors. Total laryngectomy which was performed among patients of base of tongue cancer or thyroid cancer was due to the direct involvement of larynx by tumor. The most histopathologic cancer type in this population was squamous cell carcinoma; the other 2 patients had papillary thyroid carcinoma.

There were 107 patients (50.2%) who underwent TL as the primary treatment, 102 patients (47.9%) who underwent salvage surgery for recurrent or persistent head and neck cancer after definite treatment, and 4 patients (1.9%) who underwent TL due to non-functional larynx secondary to previous organ preservation therapy. There were 87 patients (40.8%) who had prior RT history. The radiation technique for these patients was intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The primary radiation dose was between 6,600 and 7,000 cGy (2 cGy/fraction).

In terms of operative method, ipsilateral neck dissection was performed in 102 patients (47.8%), 85 patients (40%) underwent bilateral neck dissections, and the other 26 patients (12.2%) didn’t receive neck dissection because of negative nodal status after CCRT or RT. Among all patients, 165 (77.5%) underwent reconstruction with free flap transfer, including 160 anterolateral thigh and 5 anteromedial thigh flaps; 101 patients were reconstructed by the patch-on method; the other 64 patients were reconstructed by the flap-tubing method.

Mortality and immediate surgical complications

Overall, 2 patients died in this hospitalization (2/213 = 0.9%). One patient had hypopharyngeal cancer (ypT4bN0M0), underwent salvage TL with free flap reconstruction for a persistent tumor after CCRT, and died on postoperative day 47 due to pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF) related carotid blowout. The other patient, who had liver cirrhosis history (Child-Pugh classification A), underwent salvage TL for persistent supraglottic cancer (ypT2N3bM0), restaged according to the eighth edition of the AJCC system) with free flap reconstruction after the failure of CCRT. This patient developed postoperative pneumonia and wound infection with PCF and died on postoperative day 58 due to severe sepsis. There were 5 patients (5/165 = 3%) who had free flap failure and in whom plastic surgeons redid another free tissue transfer. Nine patients (9/165 = 5.45%) had anastomosis site leakage with an acute bleeding episode and required surgical exploration.

Major wound infection

Major wound infection was defined as a wound that needed to be debrided and managed in the operating room. The incidence of postoperative major wound infection was 26.8% (57/213). Donor site wound infection or complication was not noted in this cohort.

Length of hospital stay

Several factors influencing prolonged postoperative LOS were selected for univariate analysis (Table 2). Prior RT history (p = 0.007), free flap reconstruction for pharyngeal defect (p < 0.001), postoperative lower serum albumin level (p = 0.025), and postoperative anemia (p = 0.04) were all significantly associated with higher probability of prolonged LOS. Logistic regression analysis was then performed, using these significant factors in univariate analysis. In this model, postoperative serum albumin level was a significant independent predictor of prolonged LOS (OR 2.477, 95% CI 1.189–5.163, p = 0.015). In addition, prior RT history significantly increased the probability of postoperative LOS as compared to no history of RT (OR 2.194, 95% CI 1.228–3.917, p = 0.08) (Table 3).

Table 2. Univariate analysis of factors impacting postoperative hospital stay and total inpatient medical cost.

Variable Postoperative hospital stay(≧18 days) p Total inpatient medical cost (≧ 379,000 NTDb) p
Cancer location Oropharynx* - 0.521 - 0.807
Hypopharynx 58 40
Larynx 43 31
Others* - -
Salvage surgery No 46 0.062 35 0.327
Yes 57 40
Preoperative radiotherapy No 53 0.007 40 0.203
Yes 53 35
Neck dissection No 11 0.417 6 0.167
Yes 95 69
Reason of surgery Primary treatment 46 0.169 35 0.619
Residual tumor 32 22
Recurrent tumor 25 18
Non-functional* - -
Wound closure Primary closure 10 <0.001 4 <0.001
Flap reconstruction 96 71
Design of free flap reconstruction Patch on 55 0.223 38 0.078
Tubing 41 33
Preoperative albumin level (g/dL) < 3.5 9 0.144 8 0.04
≧ 3.5 81 56
Postoperative albumin level (g/dL) < 3.5 88 0.025 70 <0.001
≧ 3.5 14 3
BMIa (Kg/m2) < 23 73 0.303 54 0.069
≧ 23 31 18
Liver cirrhosis No 95 0.058 66 0.037
Yes 11 9
Diabetes mellitus No 93 0.857 66 0.827
Yes 13 9
Preoperative hemoglobin level (g/dL) < 13 53 0.946 43 0.127
≧ 13 53 32
Postoperative hemoglobin level (g/dL) < 13 96 0.04 69 0.05
≧ 13 10 6

* subgroup which not include for analysis

aBMI: body mass index

bNTD: New Taiwan dollars; 1 U.S. dollar = 30.2 NTD (according to the Bank of Taiwan, as of June 3, 2020)

Table 3. Multiple regression analysis of factors impacting longer postoperative hospitalization (≧ 18 days) of all patients.

Factor Odds ratio 95% Confident Interval p value
Postoperative Albumin (g/dL) ≧ 3.5 1 .015
< 3.5 2.477 1.189 5.163
Preoperative radiotherapy No 1 .008
Yes 2.194 1.228 3.917

Inpatient medical cost

The association between clinical variables and inpatient medical cost is shown in Table 2. Free flap reconstruction for pharyngeal defect (p < 0.001), preoperative lower serum albumin level (p = 0.04), postoperative lower serum albumin level (p < 0.001), and history of liver cirrhosis (p = 0.037) were all significantly associated with higher probability of high inpatient medical cost. Logistic regression analysis was then performed, using these significant factors in univariate analysis. In this model, postoperative hypoalbuminemia was a significant independent predictor of higher inpatient medical cost (OR 6.671, 95% CI 1.927–23.093, p = 0.003). In addition, a wound that needed free flap reconstruction significantly increased the probability of high inpatient medical cost as compared to the group whose wounds were closed primarily (OR 5.011, 95% CI 1.657–15.156, p = 0.04) (Table 4).

Table 4. Multiple regression analysis of factors impacting higher total inpatient medical cost (≧ 379,000 NTDa).

Factor Odds ratio 95% Confident Interval p value
Postoperative Albumin (g/dL) ≧ 3.5 1 .003
< 3.5 6.671 1.927 23.093
Wound closure Primary closure 1 .004
flap reconstruction 5.011 1.657 15.156

a NTD: New Taiwan dollars; 1 U.S. dollar = 30.2 NTD (according to the Bank of Taiwan, as of June 3, 2020)

Patients with postoperative hypoalbuminemia had significantly longer postoperative LOS than those patients with higher postoperative albumin levels (≧3.5 g/dL; Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.001). On average, patients with lower postoperative albumin levels (<3.5 g/dL) had 23.49 days of hospitalization after surgery, which is 35% more days compared to patients with higher postoperative albumin levels (≧3.5 g/dL), whose LOS was 17.39 days on average. As the length of hospitalization increased, the patient’s total inpatient medical bill increased correspondingly. The total inpatient medical costs of patients with lower postoperative albumin levels (<3.5 g/dL) were significantly higher than those of patients with higher postoperative albumin levels (≧3.5 g/dL; Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.001). Patients with lower postoperative albumin levels (<3.5 g/dL) had an average medical cost of 404,875 NTD (about 13,406 U.S. dollars), which is 48% higher than that of patients with higher postoperative albumin levels (≧3.5 g/dL), who had an average cost of 272,847 NTD (about 9,035 U.S. dollars) (Table 5).

Table 5. Comparison of central tendency between different postoperative albumin level among postoperative length of hospital stay and total inpatient medical cost.

Postoperative length of hospital stay (days) Total inpatient mediation cost (NTD a)
Postoperative albumin< 3.5 g/dL Postoperative albumin≧3.5 g/dL Postoperative albumin< 3.5 g/dL Postoperative albumin≧3.5 g/dL
Number 164 41 164 41
Range [8, 69] [7, 40] [136725, 1192203] [121275, 454668]
Mean 23.49 17.39 404875 272847
Mean rank 110.00 75.00 114.28 57.87
Mann-Whitney U statistic 2214.0 1511.5
p value 0.001 <0.001

a NTD: New Taiwan dollars; 1 U.S. dollar = 30.2 NTD (according to the Bank of Taiwan, as of June 3, 2020)

Discussion

In the previous studies, BuSaba and Schaumberg described multiple factors, such as several comorbid conditions, longer operative time, intraoperative blood transfusion and postoperative complications, were significantly associated with increased length of stay in elective major head and neck surgeries [6]. In different laryngeal preservation treatments in glottic Cancer, Mandelbaum et al. had also found that open surgery, endoscopic surgery was associated with reduced hospital charges than primary chemoradiation therapy [7]. Dombrée et al had studied the surgical charge by different surgical methods for total laryngectomy, which demonstrated the surgical cost was more expensive in TORS (the average surgical cost was 6,767 Euro) than open approach (the average surgical cost was 3,581 Euro) [8].

In our cohort, almost 40% of patients had had history of prior radiation therapy. Major wound infection occurred in 26.8% of patients. We found that length of stay was highly associated with postoperative hypoalbuminemia and history of prior radiation therapy. Lastly, high inpatient medical cost was significantly associated with postoperative hypoalbuminemia and wound closure by free flap for neopharyngeal defect.

The lengths of postoperative hospital stay could be various in different countries due to the distinct type of funding in each country and the various post-hospitalization structures [9]. Most patients discharged from the hospital usually going back home in Taiwan directly.

Goepfert et al. demonstrated that preoperative RT significantly influenced the length of hospital stay [2]. Tissue blood flow dysfunction may occur after radiotherapy and lead to poor wound healing status [10]. Among patients who diagnosed with HNSCC and need surgical salvage after definite radiotherapy, as Sassler et al. reported in their study, the incidence of wound complications was up to 64% [11]. In the RTOG Trial 91–11, PCF rates after salvage total laryngectomy ranged from 15 to 30% [12]. Other studies showed that PCF rates were relatively high, range from 15 to 50% for salvage surgery after definite radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy [5, 11, 12]. Our cohort also revealed similar results: that history of radiotherapy increased the wound infection rate and prolonged hospital stays.

Another possible factor increased the rate of wound infection and PCF formation may be low thyroid function status perioperatively, especially in patients had prior RT history. In previous study, Rosko et al. described postoperative hypothyroidism independently predicts postoperative wound-healing complications including PCF formation in patients who underwent salvage total laryngectomy after RT/CRT [13]. In our cohort, only 41 patients (41/213 = 19.2%) had checked thyroid function status in postoperative period. Fifteen patients were in clinical hypothyroidism, six patients were in subclinical hypothyroidism and other twenty patients were in euthyroid status. All patients diagnosed as hypothyroidism after surgery would be immediately treated with thyroxine according to our guideline. The subgroup analysis didn’t show significance in the association between thyroid function status and clinical outcomes, including postoperative hospital stay and inpatient medical cost.

The management of pharyngeal mucosa defect after TL depends on the width of residual pharyngeal wall mucosa. If it is not adequate for primary closure or the circulation over the pharyngeal mucosa is poor after RT/CRT, reconstruction with local flap or free flap is inevitable. In turn, this prompts a lengthier hospital stay, higher medical expenses, and more potential morbidities, according to the data from this cohort.

Malnutrition is a well-known factor that related to poor wound healing. Hypoalbuminemia, as one of marker of malnutrition, also indicates prolonged hospital stay [14, 15]. In the present study, however, postoperative albumin level had a stronger association with prolonged hospital stay than any other nutrition-related marker. In the Takahara’s study, postoperative hypoalbuminemia has a stronger association with longer hospital stay than other nutrition-related marker [16]. Our previous studies showed similar results: that postoperative hypoalbuminemia is a useful indicator of the development of postoperative complications and prolonged postoperative hospital stay among patients who underwent tumor excision and free flap reconstruction for an advanced stage of HNSCC [17].

A locally advanced tumor stage over the larynx or hypopharynx may cause poor nutrition status before treatment. In addition, previous RT/CRT for locally advanced tumors may further decrease the nutrition reserve after this treatment cycle. This study demonstrated that lower albumin status before surgical intervention would increase the medical cost, complications after operation, and the hospital stay.

There are several limitations that should be addressed in the current study. First, this is a retrospective, single‐institute study and selection bias in patient and data collection may happen. Second, due to the different indication of surgery, cancer location, histological type of cancer, and prior radiotherapy or not, the heterogeneity between patients was still high. Third, another important weak point was lack of thyroid function status in most our patients in our cohort.

Conclusions

Previous RT history and postoperative lower albumin level show impacts on the length of hospital stay. In addition, the application of free flap reconstruction for pharyngeal defect and postoperative lower albumin status increase the inpatient medical cost among patients who undergo total laryngectomy for laryngeal cancer/hypopharyngeal cancer. In our cohort, the inpatient medical cost was 48% higher and length of stay after surgery was 35% longer among hypoalbuminemia patients.

Supporting information

S1 Study dataset. Analytical dataset used in the study.

https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12568565.v1.

(XLSX)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files. And All relevant data are held in Figshare, a public repository. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12568565.v1

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Forastiere AA, Goepfert H, Maor M, Pajak TF, Weber R, Morrison W et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for organ preservation in advanced laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med 2003; 349:2091–2098. 10.1056/NEJMoa031317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Goepfert RP, Hutcheson KA, Lewin JS, Desai NG, Zafereo ME, Hessel AC et al. Complications, hospital length of stay, and readmission after total laryngectomy. Cancer 2017; 123:1760–1767. 10.1002/cncr.30483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bradley PJ. The Contemporary Treatment of Hypopharyngeal Cancer: Options for Function Preservation Strategies. Int J Head Neck Sci 2017; 1(3): 154–166. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Herranz J, Sarandeses A, Fernandez MF, Barro CV, Vidal JM, Gavilan J. Complications after total laryngectomy in nonradiated laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 122:892–898. 10.1016/s0194-5998(00)70020-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ganly I, Patel S, Matsuo J, Singh B, Kraus D, Boyle J et al. Postoperative complications of salvage total laryngectomy. Cancer 2005; 103:2073–2081. 10.1002/cncr.20974 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.BuSaba NY, Schaumberg DA. Predictors of prolonged length of stay after major elective head and neck surgery. Laryngoscope 2007; 117:1756–1763.6. 10.1097/MLG.0b013e3180de4d85 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mandelbaum RS, Abemayor E, Mendelsohn AH. Laryngeal Preservation in Glottic Cancer: A Comparison of Hospital Charges and Morbidity among Treatment Options. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016; August; 155(2):265–73. 10.1177/0194599816639248 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dombrée M, Crott R, Lawson G, Janne P, Castiaux A, Krug B. Cost comparison of open approach, transoral laser microsurgery and transoral robotic surgery for partial and total laryngectomies. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014; October; 271(10):2825–34. 10.1007/s00405-014-3056-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Girod A, Brancati A, Mosseri V, Kriegel I, Jouffroy T, Rodriguez J. Study of the length of hospital stay for free flap reconstruction of oral and pharyngeal cancer in the context of the new French casemix-based funding. Oral Oncol 2010; 46:190–194. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Okamoto I, Tsukahara K, Shimizu A, Sato H. Post-operative complications of salvage total laryngectomy forpost-radiotherapy recurrent laryngeal cancer using pectoralis major myocutaneous flaps. Acta Otolaryngol 2019; 139:167–171. 10.1080/00016489.2018.1532108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sassler AM, Esclamado RM, Wolf GT. Surgery after organ preservation therapy. Analysis of wound complications. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995; 121:162–165. 10.1001/archotol.1995.01890020024006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Weber RS, Berkey BA, Forastiere A, Cooper J, Maor M, Goepfert H et al. Outcome of salvage total laryngectomy following organ preservation therapy: the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial 91–11. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 129:44–49. 10.1001/archotol.129.1.44 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rosko AJ, Birkeland AC, Bellile E et al. Hypothyroidism and Wound Healing After Salvage Laryngectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:1288–1295. 10.1245/s10434-017-6278-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shiraki T, Iida O, Takahara M, Soga Y, Yamauchi Y, Hirano K et al. Predictors of delayed wound healing after endovascular therapy of isolated infrapopliteal lesions underlying critical limb ischemia in patients with high prevalence of diabetes mellitus and hemodialysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015; 49:565–573. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.01.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Azuma N, Uchida H, Kokubo T, Koya A, Akasaka N, Sasajima T. Factors influencing wound healing of critical ischaemic foot after bypass surgery: is the angiosome important in selecting bypass target artery? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2012; 43:322–328. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Takahara M, Iida O, Soga Y, Azuma N, Nanto S, Investigators P. Length and Cost of Hospital Stay in Poor-Risk Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia Undergoing Revascularization. Circ J 2018; 82:2634–2639. 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tsai MH, Chuang HC, Lin YT, Lu H, Chen WC, Fang FM et al. Clinical impact of albumin in advanced head and neck cancer patients with free flap reconstruction-a retrospective study. PeerJ 2018; 6:e4490 10.7717/peerj.4490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Giovanni Cammaroto

17 Jun 2020

PONE-D-20-17243

Predictors of hospital expenses and hospital stay among patients undergoing total laryngectomy: Cost effectiveness analysis

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Chien,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 01 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Giovanni Cammaroto

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In the ethics statement in the manuscript and in the online submission form, please provide additional information about the patient records used in your retrospective study. Specifically, please ensure that you have discussed whether all data/tissue samples  were fully anonymized before you accessed them and/or whether the IRB or ethics committee waived the requirement for informed consent. If patients provided informed written consent to have data from their medical records used in research, please include this information.

3. We noticed minor instances of text overlap with the following previous publication(s), which need to be addressed:

(1) https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0194599810393117

(2) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1368837509009877?via%3Dihub

(3) https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00016489.2018.1532108?journalCode=ioto20

(4) https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/circj/82/10/82_CJ-18-0289/_article

The text that needs to be addressed involves the Discussion section (lines 219-224, 235-237, 240-248, 255-265).

In your revision please ensure you cite all your sources (including your own works), and quote or rephrase any duplicated text outside the methods section. Further consideration is dependent on these concerns being addressed.

4. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: A well-written article.

Results are very difficult to extrapolate, because as the authors highlight cost related to surgery varies according to each country.

However, add interesting information in order to increase savings related to healthcare.

Reviewer #2: please see attachment

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Carlos M Chiesa-Estomba

Reviewer #2: Yes: Jerome R. Lechien

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PLOS ONE - June 13 2020.docx

Attachment

Submitted filename: rev comments.docx

PLoS One. 2020 Jul 16;15(7):e0236122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236122.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


26 Jun 2020

We sincerely appreciate the constructive comments by your esteemed reviewers and we believe it has enhanced the clarity of our work. We have made the changes accordingly, along with the point-by-point response below. Once again we thank the editorial board of PLOS ONE and we hope to see our work published in this prestigious journal in the near future.

Many thanks

Reply to reviewers’ comments

To Reviewer #1:

A well-written article.

Results are very difficult to extrapolate, because as the authors highlight cost related to surgery varies according to each country.

However, add interesting information in order to increase savings related to healthcare.

Response:

We thank the reviewer for this great point. It is true that different health care systems in different countries will affect the length of postoperative hospital stay and inpatient medical expenses after total laryngectomy. We add this in the discussion. (line 241-242)

To Reviewer #2:

The authors investigated the predictive factors of PO hospital stay & medical cost in patients who benefited from TL. They identified several factors associated with the PO hospital stay or medical cost, including postoperative Hb level, albumin, preoperative RT (salvage TL), cirrhosis history or wound closure method. The study is well-conducted and designed and helpful for OTOHNS surgeons. The paper is short and to-the-point, which is particularly important for a potential publication in the journal.

Some point has however been addressed to improve the manuscript.

Abstract:

1. Develop the method section: state the studied outcomes (preop RT, etc.).

Response: We thank the reviewer for this suggestion. We added this description about studied outcomes in section of abstract. (line 7 - 12)

Introduction:

2. To the point, well organized.

Response: We thank the reviewer for your appreciation.

Methods:

3. What were your indication to make a flap and which flap were used ? Specify the exclusion criteria.

Response: Free flap transfer for pharyngeal defect reconstruction after total laryngectomy would be performed if pharyngeal defect couldn’t primarily close without tension. The flap was most often harvested from the anterolateral thigh (n=160) followed by the anteromedial thigh (n=5) in our cohort. Patients who received partial laryngectomy or partial laryngopharyngectomy or patient didn’t receive total laryngectomy surgical procedure in our hospital would be excluded from our study. We have also updated the manuscript in the section of Method. (line 67 - 71 and line 153 - 156).

4. Line 80: you already define BMI in the abbreviation (line 70), just keep in this line BMI.

Response: We thank the reviewer for this insightful observation. We had change word from “Body mass index (BMI, kg/m2)” to “BMI”. (line 85)

Results:

5. line 114 = the cost is presented in Taiwan money and U.S. dollar. Please, present in the brackets the Euro value for European Physicians. Thus, you cover both U.S. and Europe.

Response: Thank you very much for this useful recommendation. We had added the information of Taiwan Dollar to Euro Exchange Rate in our revised manuscript. (line 122 - 123)

6. Briefly specify the RT protocol (number of Gy, fraction, etc.)

Response: We thank the reviewer for this suggestion. The radiation technique for these patients was intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The primary radiation dose was between 6,600 and 7,000 cGy (2 cGy/fraction). We had added this description in the section of Result. (line 149 - 150)

Discussion:

7. Another biological point that is important to consider is the thyroid status. In practice, we usually observed that hypothyroidism patients have wound healing disorder and longer hospital stay. The lack of consideration of this point is a limitation that has to be addressed.

Response: We thank the reviewer for this great point. In previous study, Rosko et al. described postoperative hypothyroidism independently predicts postoperative wound-healing complications including pharyngocutaneous fistula formation in patients who underwent salvage total larygectomy [1]. In our cohort, most patients lack of thyroid function status in laboratory exam before/after total laryngectomy. Only 10 patients (10/213=4.7%) had thyroid function status before total laryngectomy and all of them were in euthyroid status. In postoperative period, 41 patients (41/213=19.2%) had checked thyroid function status during the hospitalization. Of them, 20 patients were in euthyroid status, 15 patients were in clinical hypothyroidism (decreased serum free T4 level and elevated serum TSH level) and 6 patients were in subclinical hypothyroidism (elevated serum TSH level and normal serum free T4 level). All patients diagnosed with hypothyroidism had been immediately treated with thyroxine according to our guideline. We have performed additional subgroup analyses between different postoperative thyroid function status. The association between thyroid function status and our interested outcome, including postoperative hospital stay and inpatient medical cost was showed in Table A. The univariate analysis didn’t show significance. The reason may be (1) the small number (n=41) in this analysis and (2) temporary low thyroid functional level postoperatively, because thyroxine supplement had been prescribed after hypothyroidism diagnosed. We have also updated the manuscript to reflect these findings. (line 253 – 263, 286 – 287)

8. Develop the limitation paragraph, heterogeneity between patients (indication/tumor localization, RT) etc. that may consist of heterogeneity in the study. The inclusion of non-SCC (papillary thyroid) is another bias.

Response: We thank the reviewer for this suggestion. We had added the limitation paragraph about this study in section of discussion (line 283 – 287)

Conclusion:

9. Remove “in total”. The sentence could be: Previous RT history and postoperative lower albumin level significantly impact the length of hospital stay.

Response: We thank the reviewer for this suggestion. We had changed this sentence in section of conclusion to “Previous RT history and postoperative lower albumin level significantly impact the length of hospital stay.” (line 290)

Reference:

1. Rosko AJ, Birkeland AC, Bellile Eet al. Hypothyroidism and Wound Healing After Salvage Laryngectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:1288-1295.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Giovanni Cammaroto

30 Jun 2020

Predictors of hospital expenses and hospital stay among patients undergoing total laryngectomy: Cost effectiveness analysis

PONE-D-20-17243R1

Dear Dr. Chien,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Giovanni Cammaroto

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Giovanni Cammaroto

6 Jul 2020

PONE-D-20-17243R1

Predictors of hospital expenses and hospital stay among patients undergoing total laryngectomy: Cost effectiveness analysis

Dear Dr. Chien:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Giovanni Cammaroto

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Study dataset. Analytical dataset used in the study.

    https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12568565.v1.

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PLOS ONE - June 13 2020.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: rev comments.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files. And All relevant data are held in Figshare, a public repository. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12568565.v1


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES