Skip to main content
BMJ Open Access logoLink to BMJ Open Access
letter
. 2020 Jun 11;186(18):608–609. doi: 10.1136/vr.m2249

Owner concerns that pets have Covid-19

Katharine M Watson 1, Yijia Zhang 1, Kristine Towns 2, Ka Kahe 3
PMCID: PMC7365567  PMID: 32527898

Several pet dogs and cats have tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 worldwide.1 However, the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in pets remains unknown and restrictions to testing in many countries have likely resulted in missed diagnoses.

We undertook a nationwide convenience survey of US veterinarians to estimate owners concerns about their pets and Covid-19.

We asked whether owners had expressed concerns that their pets had Covid-19 and whether veterinarians had tried to test pets for SARS-CoV-2. Answers to these questions prompted further questions (supplementary data – available online at https://veterinaryrecord.bmj.com/content/186/18). Fifty veterinarians completed the survey between 10 and 16 May 2020, which was approved by the Indiana University institutional review board.

Supplementary data

vetrecm2249supp001.pdf (146.1KB, pdf)

Thirty veterinarians (60 per cent) reported seeing owners concerned that their pets had Covid-19. Concerned owners’ pets included four dogs, eight cats and 18 with both dogs and cats. Most veterinarians (44) did not think any pet had Covid-19. Six veterinarians thought a pet may have been infected. Five of these did not obtain a test, with two of these noting the difficulty of obtaining a test. One veterinarian tested one cat, noting cost concerns. Most concerned owners (25 of 30; 83 per cent) said their pet had no known contact with a Covid-19 patient. Five veterinarians indicated that concerned owners’ pets had been in contact with someone who had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 or who was suspected of having Covid-19.

Based on veterinarians’ clinical opinions, Covid-19 in pets appears uncommon.

However, as six veterinarians (12 per cent) thought a pet may have had Covid-19, some diagnoses may be missed. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has established guidelines for SARS-CoV-2 in pets.2 It is possible that if test criteria were less stringent and if subsidies were available for tests more pets would be tested. A solution is for authorised facilities to test potentially infected pets and for research funds be used for testing costs. Pets that test positive, in-contact animals and in-contact humans would be followed for a designated period after testing. Data collected on a few thousand animals would answer questions surrounding transmission between people and pets.

Sixty-seven per cent of US and 40 per cent of UK households have a pet and they are important family members to most owners.3, 4

Diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infections in pets is important to understanding transmission between pets, people and, possibly, wildlife. Identifying infection is also important to allay owners’ concerns and to facilitate appropriate medical treatment of pets.

References

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data

vetrecm2249supp001.pdf (146.1KB, pdf)


Articles from The Veterinary Record are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES