Skip to main content
Biomarker Research logoLink to Biomarker Research
letter
. 2020 Jul 16;8:26. doi: 10.1186/s40364-020-00206-3

Inactivating mutations in genes encoding for components of the BAF/PBAF complex and immune-checkpoint inhibitor outcome

Kevin Courtet 1,2,3, Yec’han Laizet 1,2, Carlo Lucchesi 1,2, Alban Bessede 3, Antoine Italiano 1,2,4,5,
PMCID: PMC7366303  PMID: 32695398

Abstract

Alterations of genes encoding subunits of the BAF/PBAF complexes are among the most frequent gene aberrations in human cancer. Such alterations have been shown to have an impact on tumor microenvironnement and on the capacity of tumors to respond to immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). We analysed the clinical and genetic data from 43,728 patients accessed through cBioportal. The mutational frequencies of ARID1A, ARID1B, ARID2, PBRM1, SMARCA4, and SMARCB1 were 6.6%, 3,4, 3.4, 3.2, 4.1, and 1.2%, respectively. We then investigated the association between the presence of least one nonsynonymous somatic mutation of ARID1A, ARID1B, ARID2, PBRM1, SMARCA4, or SMARCB1 and overall survival of 1661 patients treated with an ICI. Across the entire cohort, patients with BAF/PBAF mutated tumors have a statistically significant improvement in overall survival (median overall survival: 28 months [95% CI 21.6–34.3] versus 15 months [95% CI 12.9–17.0], p < 0.0001). When tumor mutational burden was adjusted for a multivariable Cox regression analysis, BAF/PBAF gene mutations remained an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in patients treated ICI. Our results establish a relationship between mutations in key genes encoding for components of the BAF/PBAF complex and outcome of patients treated with ICI. Further studies are needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of this interaction.

Keywords: Immune checkpoint inhibitors, SWI/SNF complex, BAP/PBAF complex


To the Editor

Two recent pre-clinical studies have shown that alterations of genes encoding subunits of polymorphic BRG−/BRM-associated factor (BAF) and Polybromo-associated BAF (PBAF) complexes may have an impact on tumor microenvironment and on the capacity of tumors to respond to immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) [1, 2].

Patients were selected from the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics (http://cbioportal.org) which provides a digitalized resource for investigating cancer genomics data and their correlation with clinical outcome [3, 4]. At the time of analysis, genetic data were available for 43,728 patients whereas survival and genetic data were available for 29,531 cancer patients of whom 1661 were treated with an ICI regimen [4]. Overall survival (OS) of ICI patients was defined as the time from the first infusion of treatment until death or last patient contact. Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Prognostic factors were planned to be identified by univariate and multivariate analyses using a Cox regression model. Variables tested in univariate analysis included: age, gender, tumor type, tumor mutational burden, and presence of BAF/PBAF gene mutation. Analyses were performed using SPSS 25.0 statistical software (IPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). All statistical tests were two-sided, and p < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.

We first investigated the prevalence of nonsynonymous somatic mutation of the BAF/PBAF genes: ARID1A, ARID1B, ARID2, PBRM1, SMARCA4, and SMARCB1 in 43,728 patients with different cancer types (Fig. 1a). Patients with uterus carcinoma, melanoma, and bladder cancer have the highest proportion of BAF/PBAF gene mutations.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Prevalence of BAF/PBAF genes mutations in 43,728 patients with different cancer types (a) and overall survival of patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) according to BAF/PBAF mutational status and tumor mutational burden (b-d). a Prevalence of ARID1A, ARID1B, ARID2, PBRM1, SMARCA4, or SMARCB1 genes mutations in 43,728 patients with different cancer types (b) Kaplan-Meir curves of overall survival in 1661 patients treated with (ICI) according to BAF/PBAF gene status for the overall cohort (b) and in patients with low (< 10 mutations/megabase) (c), and high (> 10 mutations/megabase) (d) tumor mutational burden. Red curves: BAF/PBAF mutated tumors, blue curves: BAF/PBAF wild-type tumors

We then investigated the association between the presence of least one nonsynonymous somatic mutation of these genes and overall survival in a previously described cohort of 1661 patients treated with a ICI. We found that patients with BAF/PBAF mutated tumors have a statistically significant improvement in overall survival (OS) (median OS: 28 months [95% CI 21.6–34.3] versus 15 months [95% CI 12.9–17.0], p < 0.0001) (Fig. 1b).

To investigate the possibility that this result might simply be attributable to an intrinsic prognostic impact of BAF/PBAF mutations, unrelated to ICI, we analysed the outcome of 27,870 patients with metastatic cancers who did not receive ICI and with available survival data. In these patients, BAF/PBAF mutated tumors had worse OS in comparison with wild-type tumors (109.2 months versus 61.8 months, p < 0.001) suggesting that the improved outcome observed in patients treated with ICI was related to a real predictive value of BAF/PBAF aberrations (Supplementary Figure 1).

When analysing the prognostic impact of BAF/PBAF mutations according to tumor mutational burden (TMB) level, BAF/PBAF mutations were associated with overall survival only in tumors with low TMB (< 10 mutations/megabase) (21 months versus 14 months, p = 0.024) (Fig. 1c-d) who represented the majority of patients (n = 1173, 70.6%). When TMB was adjusted for a multivariable Cox regression analysis in the whole cohort, BAF/PBAF gene mutations remained an independent prognostic factor for OS in patients treated ICI (Table 1).

Table 1.

Multivariate analysis for overall survival (n = 1661)

HR 95% CI P value
Tumor mutational burden ≤ 10 mutation/Mb 1.47 [1.2–1.8] < 0.0001
>  10 mutation/mb 1
Cancer Type Bladder 1.04 [0.8–1.3] < 0.0001
Melanoma 0.55 [0.4–0.7]
NSCLC 1.3 [1.1–1.5]
Other 1
BAF/PBAF mutational status Wild-type 1.2 [1.05–1.4] 0.017
Mutated 1

The presence of BAF/PBAF gene mutations was associated with improved outcome on immunotherapy in almost all carcinomas types except in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), unknown primary carcinoma and renal cancer even if the effect for some cancer types did not reach statistical significance, due to limited sample size. Interestingly, a recent study has shown that mutation or low expression of BAF/PBAF genes including SMARCA2 and PBRM1 were associated with higher neoantigen burden and higher tumor infiltration of activated CD8 T-cells in NSCLC [4]. These data indicate that the impact of BAF/PBAF gene aberration on tumor microenvironment may vary according to tumor types and further studies are needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of this interaction.

Altogether, our findings establish a relationship between mutations in key genes encoding for components of the BAF/PBAF complex and outcome of patients treated with ICI and pave the way for clinical trials combining ICI with small-molecule inhibitors of chromatin remodeling pathways such as EZH2 inhibitors [5].

Supplementary information

40364_2020_206_MOESM1_ESM.docx (151.2KB, docx)

Additional file 1: Supplementary Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier curves of overall survival of 27,870 cancer patients according to BAF/PBAF mutational status (red curves: mutated BAF/BPAF, blue curves: wild-type BAF/PBAF).

Acknowledgments

None

Abbreviations

BAF

Polymorphic BRG−/BRM-associated factor

ICI

Immune checkpoint inhibitors

NSCLC

Non-small cell lung cancer

OS

Overall survival

PBAF

Polybromo-associated BAF (PBAF)

TMB

Tumor mutational burden

Authors’ contributions

AI drafted the manuscript. KC performed the statistical analysis. All authors provided comments on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

None

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

AI has received research grants from Astra Zeneca, BMS and MSD.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Kevin Courtet, Email: k.courtet@bordeaux.unicancer.fr.

Yec’han Laizet, Email: y.laizet@bordeaux.unicancer.fr.

Carlo Lucchesi, Email: c.lucchesi@bordeaux.unicancer.fr.

Alban Bessede, Email: a.bessede@bordeaux.unicancer.fr.

Antoine Italiano, Email: a.italiano@bordeaux.unicancer.fr.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s40364-020-00206-3.

References

  • 1.Miao D, Margolis CA, Gao W, et al. Genomic correlates of response to immune checkpoint therapies in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Science. 2018;359:801–806. doi: 10.1126/science.aan5951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pan D, Kobayashi A, Jiang P, et al. A major chromatin regulator determines resistance of tumor cells to T cell-mediated killing. Science. 2018;359:770–775. doi: 10.1126/science.aao1710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gao J, Aksoy BA, Dogrusoz U, et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci Signal. 2013;6(269):pl1. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2004088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Park LC, et al. Impact of chromatin remodeling genes including SMARCA2 and PBRM1 on neoantigen and immune landscape of NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol. 2018;13(10):S525. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.08.716. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zingg D, Arenas-Ramirez N, Sahin D, et al. The histone methyltransferase Ezh2 controls mechanisms of adaptive resistance to tumor immunotherapy. Cell Rep. 2017;20(4):854–867. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

40364_2020_206_MOESM1_ESM.docx (151.2KB, docx)

Additional file 1: Supplementary Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier curves of overall survival of 27,870 cancer patients according to BAF/PBAF mutational status (red curves: mutated BAF/BPAF, blue curves: wild-type BAF/PBAF).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Biomarker Research are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES