Correction to: Hum Resour Health (2019) 17:54
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0392-2
Following publication of the original article [1], the authors identified an error in Table 2. The correct table is given below.
Table 2.
Percent of interventions reported as “not started”, “in progress” and “completed” by thematic area
| Thematic Area | No. of interventions | No. of responders | Not started N (%) |
In progress N (%) |
Completed N (%) |
In progress & completed N (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Ensuring an educated, competent and motivated nursing and midwifery workforce within effective and responsive health systems at all levels and settings | 7 | 35 | 61 (25%) | 123 (50%) | 61 (25%) | 184 (75%) |
| 2. Optimizing policy development, effective leadership, management and governance | 6 | 35 | 42 (20%) | 122 (58%) | 46 (22%) | 168 (80%) |
| 3. Working together to maximize the capacities and potentials of nurses and midwives through intra- and interprofessional collaborative partnerships, education and CPD | 4 | 35 | 46 (33%) | 77 (59%) | 10 (8%) | 87 (67%) |
| 4. Mobilizing political will to invest in building effective evidence-based nursing and midwifery workforce development | 5 | 35 | 53 (30%) | 93 (53%) | 30 (17%) | 123 (70%) |
| Overall from four thematic areas | 22 | 35 | 200(26%) | 420(55%) | 150(19%) | 570(74%) |
Reference
- 1.Ajuebor O, et al. Are the Global Strategic Directions for Strengthening Nursing and Midwifery 2016–2020 being implemented in countries? Findings from a cross-sectional analysis. Hum Resour Health. 2019;17:54. doi: 10.1186/s12960-019-0392-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
