Early precursor T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: current paradigms and evolving concepts

Omar Castaneda Puglianini; Nikolaos Papadantonakis

doi:10.1177/2040620720929475

. 2020 Jul 16;11:2040620720929475. doi: 10.1177/2040620720929475

Early precursor T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: current paradigms and evolving concepts

Omar Castaneda Puglianini ¹, Nikolaos Papadantonakis ^2,^✉

PMCID: PMC7370557 PMID: 32733662

Abstract

Early precursor T cell-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ETP-ALL) is a rare entity characterized by chemo-resistance and a paucity of data regarding optimal management. We review here the literature regarding the management of ETP-ALL and focus on the recent, emerging data, regarding the potential role of molecularly targeted approaches with a focus on venetoclax.

Keywords: early precursor T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, ETP-ALL

Introduction

T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) is a rare hematologic malignancy in adults.^1,2 A particular challenging subgroup is early precursor T cell (ETP)-ALL.³ ETP-ALL has distinct characteristics compared with other subtypes of T-ALL, and has attracted attention given its refractoriness to chemotherapy. In this review, we will outline the features of ETP-ALL, diagnostic challenges, and treatment outcomes. We will also outline the emerging data for targeted treatments.

ETP-ALL: a distinct entity of T-cell ALL

ETP-ALL was recognized as a new provisional entity in the 2016 update to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of acute leukemia, and is characterized by a unique immunophenotype and genetic profile.⁴ The origin of ETP-ALL is considered to involve the migration of cells from the thymus to the bone marrow (BM).⁵ These cells, although they have characteristics of T-cell lineage commitment, continue to have the potential for myeloid/dendritic cell differentiation. As such, ETP-ALL lymphoblasts have positivity for antigens such as CD7, CD2, and cCD3, but also positivity for antigens associated with myeloid lineage, such as CD34, CD117,CD13,CD11b, HLADR, and CD65, whereas MPO is negative and CD4 may be positive in some cases.^4,6 On the other hand, CD5 is negative/weakly positive (expressed in up to 75% of blasts).⁷ Notably, CD1a and CD8 are not typically detected. The CD33 and CD123 may be positive and appear to be so more frequently compared with non-ETP-ALL.^8,9 Interestingly, ETP-ALL with co-expression of B-cell markers has been reported, but the numbers of patients were small.¹⁰ The clinical significance of B-cell marker expression is unclear.

A study raised concerns if the ETP-ALL immunophenotypic signature may lead to underestimation of ETP-ALL cases.¹¹ The authors of the latter study did not include CD5 and rather utilized CD7+, with CD34+ and/or CD13+/CD33+, whereas CD1, CD4, CD8 were negative.¹¹ This immunophenotypic signature identified cases with ETP-ALL gene expression signature with 94% specificity.

Mutations uncommonly seen in other subtypes of ALL are enriched in ETP-ALL patients. Such mutations include EZH2, FLT3 ITD, RAS, and RUNX1.^12–15 Recently, NPM1 deletions were found to be enriched in ETP-ALL patients.¹⁶ The ETP-ALL cases reported in the literature do not have a uniform or pathognomonic cytogenetic aberration profile. PICALM-MLLT10 fusion has been reported and was associated with dismal prognosis in the context of ETP-ALL.¹⁰ Similarly, HOXA gene activating mutations have dismal outcomes.¹⁷

ETP-ALL cases may be challenging to diagnose. Exemplifying this difficulty, in a recent publication, the authors used flow cytometry to categorize cases as definite or probable.¹⁸ Scoring schemas based on immunophenotypic profiles have been reported in an attempt to distinguish ETP-ALL from other leukemias.^7,9,19 Notably, it may be challenging to distinguish ETP-ALL from mixed phenotype acute leukemia.⁶

ETP-ALL is uncommon (reports of ETP range from 5% to 36% in T cell ALL series/studies).^18–20 Limited data point towards a higher prevalence in adults compared with the pediatric population.¹⁸ ETP-ALL is a relatively new entity as it was not discovered until the late 2000s, and literature, especially for adults, is limited.

The interplay of transcription factors to the development of ETP-ALL has been explored only partially. A seminal study revealed that the expression of FLT3 ITD modulated the down-regulation of EZH2 and RUNX1, leading to ETP-ALL features in a mouse model.²¹ Other studies have raised the possibility that an entity termed “near/close to ETP” has a gene expression signature that is distinct from non-ETP-ALL but does not have the typical immunophenotype of ETP-ALL.^22–24 Of particular interest are the findings implicating EZH2 inactivation in murine models resulting in upregulation of genes expressed in ETP-ALL.²⁵

Outcomes of conventional chemotherapy are suboptimal in adult ETP-ALL patients

Few studies have examined the impact of chemotherapy and optimal treatment management of ETP-ALL. The optimal treatment regimen for ETP-ALL remains uncertain.²⁶ Studies have reported using different regimens utilizing combinations of steroids, vincristine, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, and anthracyclines.²⁶ Notably, the majority of the reported studies included a relatively small number of patients.

A study reported outcomes of patients with ETP compared with non-ETP-ALL treated under GRAALL-2003 and GRAALL-2005 protocols.¹⁵ The study identified 47 patients with ETP and 166 with non-ETP-ALL. The majority of ETP-ALL patients were male and younger (median age 38.5 years old), with lower white blood cell (WBC) count (median WBC 13.2 × 10⁹/l) compared with the non-ETP patients. At the molecular level, the majority of patients harbored mutations, which were clustered in the RAS signaling pathway, and involved cytokine receptors and genes involved in histone modifications. Although patients with ETP-ALL attained morphologic complete remission (CR), a higher percentage had persistent minimal residual disease (MRD) as measured on days 42 and 84. When data were censored for allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT), the ETP-ALL group had an inferior overall survival (OS) (49.2% versus 67.4%) compared with non-ETP-ALL, whereas event free survival (EFS) was not different.

Data from three consecutive GMALL studies were reported in 2009.²⁷ Further analysis identified 57 patients with ETP-ALL²⁸ (defined as CD1a⁻, CD8⁻, CD5^weak with co-expression of stem and/or myeloid markers). The ETP-ALL patients comprised a sizeable fraction (32%) of early T-cell ALL (defined as sCD3⁻, CD1a⁻). Of ETP-ALL patients, 79% achieved CR after induction and the probability of survival at 10 years was 35%; 46% of patients with ETP-ALL remained at CR at 9 years of follow up.²⁸

In another study for MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC),²⁹ outcomes of 111 patients with T-cell ALL/lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) were reported. Notably, 15 patients had ETP-ALL and 4 ETP-LBL. The majority of patients were male, with chromosomal aberrations (37% having diploid karyotype); 16% of patients had CNS involvement. The majority of patients (79%) were treated with hyperCVAD +/– nelarabine. Patients with ETP-ALL had significantly worse rates of CR achievement and OS (median 20 months versus NR) but comparable EFS to that of non ETP-ALL patients (the latter likely impacted by the low number of patients). Prognostic markers were not identified likely given the low number of patients. Only three ETP-ALL patients underwent alloHSCT and one maintained long-term remission.

In a small series from India, outcomes of six patients were described, and only one responded to intensive chemotherapy.³⁰ In another report, four patients received FLAG-IDA [fludarabine, cytarabine (Ara-C), granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and idarubicin] early on after induction, with three achieving CR without MRD.³¹ One patient had a reduction in leukemic burden and subsequently received high dose cytarabine with sorafenib. All patients were able to proceed to alloHSCT, but two succumbed to complications.

The use of asparaginase in the upfront setting in ETP-ALL patients was reported to be associated with improved progression-free survival.¹⁸ A recent publication reported a cryptic inversion [inv(7)(q22.3q21.3)] in patients with relapsed ETP-ALL that led to enhanced levels of asparagine synthetase (ASNS).³² Increased levels of ASNS may play a role in conferring resistance to asparaginase.³³ The importance of this finding is hampered by the limited number of reported patients and the conflicting reports regarding the ASNS role in chemo-resistance.³⁴

A case report described a 51-year-old man with ETP-ALL and monosomy 7 as well as mutations in KRAS and DNMT3A genes.³⁵ The patient was treated initially with the HyperCVAD regimen without response. Clofarabine and cytarabine were used as salvage leading to profound hypocellularity, and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis for monosomy 7 was negative. The patient was able to proceed to alloHSCT.

The management of refractory/relapsed patients with ETP-ALL is challenging. ETP-ALL lacks the targeted, United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapies available for relapsed or refractory Pre-B ALL such as inotuzumab ozogamicin, blinatumomab, or CAR-T cells.^36,37 Therefore, outside the context of clinical trials, chemotherapy is the backbone of the salvage treatments and may include peg-asparaginase-containing regimens (e.g., augmented HyperCVAD, MOpAD),^38,39 alkylating containing regimens, liposomal vincristine,⁴⁰ high dose cytarabine, or nelarabine.^41,42 Notably, the combination of nelarabine with the hyperCVAD was reported not to improve outcomes, with the caveat of a low number of ETP-ALL patients.²⁹ Data comparing the efficiency of different regimens are lacking.

In a retrospective study conducted in China, patients with R/R T-cell ALL were treated with a regimen comprised of cytarabine, aclarubicin, and G-CSF (CAG)⁴³ (the study is available as pre-print). Of the 41 patients, 26 had ETP-ALL. CR rates were high (~80%) regardless whether patients had ETP or non-ETP-ALL. Out of the 26 patients with ETP-ALL, 14 were able to proceed to alloHSCT. Patients with ETP-ALL had a 2-year OS of 78.3% and EFS of 63.2%. The results are very promising, but aclarubicin is not available in Europe or the United States.

In a case report, again from China, a patient with ETP lymphoblastic lymphoma did not respond to a five-drug regimen including anthracycline, cytarabine, steroids, pegaspariginase, and vindesine.⁴⁴ However, when the modified CAG regimen was combined with low dose decitabine the patient was able to achieve CR and proceed to alloHSCT.

Notably, encouraging treatment outcomes for ETP-ALL in children have been reported. The COG AALL0434 trial included 130 ETP-ALL and 195 near-ETP-ALL patients (~ 28% of the 1144 patients with T-ALL enrolled).^45,46 Significantly, more patients with ETP or near-ETP ALL had induction failure compared with non-ETP-ALL patients. In addition, more patients with ETP and near-ETP-ALL had MRD on day 29 compared with non-ETP-ALL patients. However, EFS and OS were similar between the three subgroups.⁴⁶

In this trial, the high and intermediate risk patients could receive through randomization six courses of nelarabine administrated for 5 days. Notably, the patients with induction failure were non randomly assigned to receive the nelarabine courses.⁴⁷ In addition, high- and intermediate-risk patients received cranial irradiation.

On the UKALL 2003 trial, 35 and 17 T-ALL patients were classified as definite/probable and possible ETP-ALL respectively.⁴⁸ Induction failures for ETP-ALL patients were rare in this trial (only two patients). With a median follow up of approximately 5 years, the EFS of ETP-ALL patients was not inferior (76%) to those with non-ETP-ALL (84.1%). There was a trend (p = 0.08) for inferior OS (84.1% versus 90.9%) for patients with ETP-ALL. Both protocols (AALL0434 and UKALL 2003) employed risk-stratified treatments.

A recent retrospective analysis of 185 T-ALL patients recruited in the ALL-HR-2003 and LL-HR-11 trials was reported.⁴⁹ Diagnosis of ETP-ALL was based on the criteria proposed by Zuurbier and colleagues,¹¹ and, notably, dim CD5 expression was not a criterion. A total of 34 patients met criteria for ETP-ALL, and their characteristics and outcomes were compared with those of 133 non-ETP-ALL patients. The authors reported that the median age for ETP-ALL patients was 39 years, and lymphadenopathy was common (79%). Compared with non-ETP-ALL patients, the ETP-ALL patients had inferior responses to chemotherapy, as manifested by persistence of blasts at day 14, administration of a second induction course.⁴⁹ Overall, 77% of the ETP-ALL patients ultimately attained CR compared with 94% for non-ETP-ALL; 85% of ETP-ALL patients were MRD positive (level > 0.01%) compared with 37% for non-ETP-ALL patients. Moreover, the rate of alloHSCT was significantly higher in ETP versus non-ETP-ALL patients (70% compared with 21%, respectively). Despite performance of alloHSCT, the outcomes of patients with ETP-ALL were dismal.

The role of alloHSCT in the management of ETP-ALL

As noted above, ETP-ALL is a complex and aggressive neoplasm with multiple factors leading to poor outcomes. Over the past several years, we have seen significant progress in the management of ALL, including new therapies, better MRD assessment, and stratification tools that continue to refine the role of alloHSCT. Transplant outcomes continue to improve over time, and the use of reduced-intensity regimens offer the option of transplantation to less fit and older patients with ALL.^50–52 In general, allograft for ALL in CR1 has been increasingly performed based on the presence of high-risk features,⁵³ which includes the ETP-ALL phenotype. However, with the advent of pediatric-based chemotherapy protocols, some of the traditional high-risk features are being brought into question. In addition, some of the accepted indications for alloHSCT may need reevaluation in the light of outcomes with intensive regimens, the more widespread use of MRD status, and the use of oncogenetics for risk stratification.⁵⁴

High-intensity upfront alloHSCT in CR1 for ALL has been justified historically by a post-relapse 5-year survival of less than 10%.⁵⁵ The largest randomized study comparing post-remission therapies in adults with ALL in CR1 (MRC/ECOG trial) demonstrated a significant survival advantage for alloHSCT in adults with standard-risk disease when performed in CR1.⁵⁶ However, this was not the case for high-risk patients; the discordance may have been due to the significantly higher non-relapse mortality (NRM) in the latter group. A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis by Pidala and coworkers that included a total of 14 trials consisting of 3157 patients,⁵⁷ supported the use of matched sibling donor alloHSCT as optimal post-remission therapy in ALL patients aged 15 years or over. In this patient population, this approach offered a superior OS and disease-free survival (DFS) at the expense of increased NRM. A European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) analysis has concluded that alloHSCT outcomes for adults with ALL in CR1 have improved significantly overtime in regards to reduced NRM, relapse, treatment failure, and overall mortality despite the use of myeloablative conditioning regimens.⁵⁸

Bond and colleagues examined whether alloHSCT influenced the prognosis of adult ETP-ALL using data from the GRAALL studies suggesting that alloHSCT directly affected the outcome of patients in the ETP cohort.¹⁵ Patients were more likely to receive transplantation in first CR because of the frequently poor initial treatment response. The analysis showed that alloHSCT correlated with a trend toward better OS in this high-risk population. Taken together, these findings suggest that implementation of alloHSCT in first CR confers a survival benefit that may abrogate the negative effects of intrinsic therapeutic resistance in ETP-ALL.

As noted previously, a recent retrospective analysis by Genescà and colleagues included 34 patients with ETP-ALL, and, despite treatment intensification with alloHSCT, a significant improvement on OS was not attained.⁴⁹ The 4-years OS was 36% for ETP-ALL patients when censoring occurred at alloHSCT and 33% without censoring for alloHSCT. On the other hand, non-ETP-ALL patients exhibited a 4-years OS 49% when censoring at alloHSCT and 51% without censoring for alloHSCT. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 3 years for the ETP-ALL patients was 24% versus 11% for the rest of the patients, but it did not reach statistical significance. The authors pointed out that the OS for the patients who underwent alloHSCT was lower compared with other studies, and that the inferior outcomes of ETP-ALL patients may be secondary to lower CR rates.⁴⁹

Another recent report by Zhu and colleagues (based on abstract available in English) explored the efficacy and outcomes of alloHSCT in 23 patients with ETP-ALL from 2010 to 2018.⁵⁹ The patients were diagnosed following WHO criteria. Of the 12 patients who received HaploHSCT, 7 had matched sibling donor alloHSCT, and in 4 patients matched unrelated donors were utilized. Out of the 23 patients, 19 were in CR at the time of alloHSCT. After the alloHSCT, 22 patients engrafted, and 1 died due to infection on day +14 post-transplantation.

The estimated 18-month OS and relapsed-free survival (RFS) rates were 55.0 ± 14.4% and 48.1 ± 14.7%, respectively. The median OS of patients proceeding to alloHSCT at CR was 20 months. The OS and RFS between HaploHSCT and match-sibling alloHSCT were comparable (p = 0.460 and 0.420 respectively). The transplant-related mortality (TRM) was 4.3%.

Four patients received alloHSCT as salvage and achieved CR. Three patients relapsed within a year post-transplant, with median OS of only 13 months. Although limited by the small number of patients, it appears that salvage alloHSCT may not be associated with favorable long-term outcomes in ETP-ALL patients.

In summary, alloHSCT remains an important part of the therapy for ALL including high-risk subgroups as ETP-ALL, with the caveat that the indication for alloHSCT in CR1 may change in the future. For example, MRD negative status may be attained by other means, including adoptive cell therapy, which could be an effective bridge to alloHSCT.

Novel treatment and approaches

The dismal outcomes of ETP-ALL with standard chemotherapy have led others to explore the use of different approaches including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), monoclonal antibodies, and inhibitors of anti-apoptotic pathways. Adoptive immunotherapies are a field with potentially great promise, and we will discuss recent developments.

Dasatinib

In one case report,⁶⁰ a young adult patient with ETP harboring the NUP214-ABL1 aberration was treated with a combination of vincristine, idarubicin, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone as well as dasatinib 100 mg/day for the first 2 weeks. The rationale for the use of dasatinib was that the NUP214-ABL1 fusion protein had been demonstrated to be sensitive to dasatinib. The fusion protein contains the N-terminal part of the NUP214 protein, while the C-terminal part is derived from the ABL1 protein. The patient rapidly cleared lymphoblasts from the BM and attained CR. The patient proceeded to receive consolidation with cytarabine, cyclophosphamide, and 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP). In vitro assays demonstrated that the patient lymphoblasts underwent apoptosis in the presence of dasatinib or selinexor (the combination has led to a more pronounced effect). Although this case report is encouraging, the prevalence of this particular aberration in ETP-ALL patients is unknown; it has been reported to occur in 6% of T-cell ALL patients.

CD123 targeting approaches

The interleukin-3 receptor (CD123) has attracted attention in the context of hematological malignancies, with several ongoing clinical trials.^61,62 CD123 has been reported to be expressed in patients with T-cell ALL (and especially ETP-ALL) and with a higher prevalence in adults compared with children. It should be noted that reports regarding the pattern of expression of CD123 in hemopoietic stem cells and T-cell ALL have been conflicting,^8,63 possibly due to different cut-offs for the relative fluorescence intensity.

Pre-clinical models have shown the activity of an immunoconjugate targeting CD123 blasts.⁸

Ruxolitinib

The JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib has been approved for patients afflicted by myelofibrosis. It has attracted attention in the context of ETP-ALL given that the JAK/STAT pathway may be affected.⁶⁴ In xenotransplant models, ruxolitinib demonstrated activity as monotherapy but did not eradicate ETP-ALL blasts.⁶⁴ A clinical trial for relapsed/refractory ETP-ALL patients combines ruxolitinib with vincristine, prednisone and l-asparaginase [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03613428].

Daratumumab

Daratumumab is a monoclonal antibody against CD38, which is approved for use in patients with multiple myeloma.^65,66 Preclinical data demonstrated that, in ETP-ALL with xenotransplants, daratumumab demonstrated activity.⁶⁷ Reports of Daratumumab use for ETP-ALL are scarce.^68,69 In one report, experience with daratumumab is described in two patients.⁶⁸ One patient had refractory disease following the UKALL-XII protocol. Moreover, the patient was not deemed a candidate for intensive salvage chemotherapy given comorbidities and fungal pneumonia. To this end, the patient was treated with daratumumab monotherapy, and achieved morphological remission rapidly. Further administration of daratumumab led to MRD negativity. Notably, multiple administrations of daratumumab were not associated with significant toxicities, and the patient was able to undergo alloHSCT. Unfortunately, the patient died from infectious complications. The second patient had refractory disease after induction and with MRD positivity after alloHSCT. Daratumumab was able to eradicate MRD positivity. In another report,⁶⁹ daratumumab was used for a heavily treated patient who had relapsed after a second alloHSCT. Daratumumab was well tolerated, and the patient achieved MRD negativity.

It is important to note the activity of daratumumab in the above case reports. Post-alloHSCT relapse and persistent disease coupled with fungal infections, are very challenging cases with a dismal prognosis. The reported – albeit limited in number – activity of daratumumab in ETP-ALL is very encouraging. A clinical trial using daratumumab for patients with T-ALL is underway, and the outcomes of ETP-ALL patients that may be enrolled would be of interest.

Cellular therapy: CAR T and NK cells

CAR-T cells have been approved in the context of R/R B-cell ALL, and adoptive cell therapy is a rapidly evolving field.⁷⁰ The progress regarding T-cell ALL has been slow, given the inherent difficulties targeting T-cell lymphoblasts. Such difficulties stem from the fact that epitopes are shared between lymphoblasts and normal T-cells. Therefore, CAR-T cells may attack lymphoblasts, normal T-cells, and CAR-T cells (fratricide).⁷¹ Furthermore, strategies to circumvent fratricide such as targeting CD1a cannot be used in ETP-ALL as the latter does not express CD1a.⁷² Despite these challenges, CAR-T cells targeting CD5⁷³ and CD7 have been reported and are in clinical trials.⁷¹ The progress in this field, although slower compared with B-cell ALL, is encouraging. It is currently unclear what impact CAR-T cells will have on ETP-ALL, and what would be the optimal target given its distinctive immunophenotype.

The field of cancer immunotherapy has further expanded with the advent of CAR-natural killer (NK) cells.^74–76 Off-the-shelf CAR-NK cells have attracted attention as the risk of graft versus disease is diminished,⁷⁴ and these cells have a relatively short life span.⁷⁷ CAR NK cells recognizing CD7 have been described and may offer a novel treatment approach.⁷⁸ Another emerging technology is the use of CAR modified γδ T cells,⁷⁹ which may offer another avenue for targeting difficult to treat diseases such as refractory/relapsed leukemias.

Targeting CD33

ETP-ALL may express CD33, and, in one report, more frequently than non-ETP-ALL (63% versus 17.9%) using 20% of blasts as the cut-off for positivity.⁹ In a pre-clinical model, the use of an immunoconjugate targeting CD33 leads to increased apoptosis.⁹ The use of gemtuzumab ozogamicin has been anecdotal in ETP-ALL.

Venetoclax

Venetoclax is an oral inhibitor of the Bcl-2 family of proteins and is used in patients with lymphoid malignancies such as CLL, and non Hodgkin’s lymphoma.^80,81 Venetoclax was also recently approved for AML,⁸² and, thus, exhibits a broad anti-leukemic effect. A few reports have indicated that Venetoclax can exhibit activity in ETP-ALL.

In a case report series published from MDACC,⁸³ two elderly patients received venetoclax for ETP-ALL. The first was refractory to HyperCVAD, nelarabine, and liposomal vincristine. The patient was treated with miniCVD and venetoclax. The initial dose of venetoclax was 400 mg daily after a ramp-up phase, and then 100 mg daily when azole antifungal prophylaxis was added. The patient achieved morphological remission with a low level of MRD by flow cytometry. The course was complicated by cytopenias, and, ultimately, the patient was transitioned to venetoclax monotherapy. The second patient was diagnosed with secondary AML initially and failed remission-induction chemotherapy. Upon evaluation at MDACC, the diagnosis of ETP-ALL was made; monosomy 7 was also observed amongst other cytogenetic aberrations. The use of miniCVD and venetoclax had a transient response only. Notably, the best response achieved was without evidence of ETP-ALL by morphology but with MRD by flow cytometry.

The use of venetoclax in combination with decitabine was reported by Rahmat and coworkers.⁸⁴ The patient was initially diagnosed with AML NOS and achieved CR with a combination of daunorubicin and high-dose cytarabine. The patient then received then cytarabine consolidation and sorafenib (given the presence of a FLT3 mutation). The patient relapsed after alloHSCT, and flow cytometry revealed positivity for CD34, TdT, CD5, and CD7 markers. Mutation analysis revealed aberrations in FBXW7, NOTCH1, and EZH2 genes. Retrospective analysis using clonoSEQ revealed that the same lymphoid population was present at diagnosis. Hence, there is a possibility that the AML NOS was in fact T-ALL.

Venetoclax was used in a dose of 800 mg daily reduced to 400 mg subsequent to given azole antifungal prophylaxis. The patient also received decitabine 20 mg/m² for 5 days every 28 days. The patient achieved CR within two cycles without MRD. Eventually the patient underwent a second alloHSCT. The case highlights the diagnostic challenges that aberrant myeloid markers may pose in the diagnosis of ETP-ALL, but also the potential sensitivity of ETP-ALL cells to venetoclax.

One of the authors (NP) also treated a patient with refractory ETP-ALL utilizing venetoclax and miniCVD. The patient received HyperCVAD at diagnosis and eventually achieved CR without MRD by flow cytometry. While on maintenance, the patient was diagnosed with relapsed disease. The patient achieved CR with nelarabine, but this was short-lived. The patient was treated with multiple regimens as remissions were short-lived or there was no response. Given the multiple lines of treatment previously received, the treatment plan was based on venetoclax (100 mg daily given concurrent azole anti-fungal prophylaxis) and miniCVD based on the experience described by MDACC. The patient tolerated miniCVD plus venetoclax without significant toxicities, and achieved CR with MRD by multi-color flow cytometry. The patient was transitioned to maintenance with monthly steroids and vincristine without antimetabolites; venetoclax was continued. The patient received prophylaxis with voriconazole as well as acyclovir and fluoroquinolone while neutropenic. G-CSF support was also provided with each cycle of miniCVD/methotrexate and cytarabine. The patient remained on CR (albeit with MRD) for more than 8 months with the described treatment schema.

The results of use of venetoclax and an attenuated chemotherapy regimen such as miniCVD, or in combination with decitabine in the relapsed setting, are encouraging. However, more extensive series are needed to determine efficacy and any emergent toxicities.

A case series from Italy reported outcomes of three patients treated with the combination of venetoclax and bortezomib.⁸⁵ Two patients had ETP-ALL and one near ETP-ALL. Two patients received HyperCVAD and one patient received vincristine and prednisone (given the advanced age/comorbidities). Subsequently, the two patients treated with intensive chemotherapy received further chemotherapy with GIMEMA LAL0904 and NILG ALL 10/07 trial followed by anti-CD52 antibody, respectively. The third patient received nelarabine. Given the persistence of ALL, patient samples were used to determine sensitivity to a panel of therapeutic agents. Bortezomib and venetoclax were noted to have activity ex vivo against lymphoblasts. All patients received venetoclax 800 mg for 28 days and bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² twice weekly. The leukemic burden was significantly decreased post-treatment in all patients by morphology, flow cytometry, and FISH analysis. Two patients were able to proceed to alloHSCT, and the third was reported to have hematological recovery before being discharged to hospice.

In another report,⁸⁶ a patient with ETP-ALL had refractory disease to HyperCVAD induction. ETP-ALL was noted to be sensitive to bortezomib and venetoclax. The use of venetoclax monotherapy (800 mg daily) was associated with leukemia burden decrease. The use of bortezomib led to a further decrease in leukemia burden and the patient was planned to undergo alloHSCT.

A phase I clinical trial currently ongoing in MDACC is exploring the effect of venetoclax and miniCVD/methotrexate and cytarabine [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03808610]. Another study is currently underway and combines liposomal vincristine with venetoclax [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03504644], while a third combines navitoclax and venetoclax in patients with relapsed/refractory ALL [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03181126].

The results of those early studies are eagerly awaited, especially in the ETP-ALL subgroup of patients and may provide more data regarding the possibility of treating ETP-ALL without intensive chemotherapy regimens associated with toxicities and prolonged hospitalizations.

Notably, the encouraging findings of venetoclax activity have led to the testing of molecules with activity against other proteins with anti-apoptotic activity. The S63845 is a potent inhibitor of MCL1 protein, and, in preclinical studies, it demonstrated activity against the Loucy cell line (resembling ETP-ALL).⁸⁷

Tailored treatments (precision oncology)

Precision oncology has attracted attention as it offers the possibility to tailor treatment to the characteristics of the patient malignancy. A recent publication utilized computational biology modeling to identify synergistic chemotherapy combinations for patients with ETP-ALL.¹⁶ In addition, ex vivo models were able to identify the sensitivity of ETP-ALL cells to venetoclax and other compounds.^86,88 In another publication, patient derived xenotransplants were used to identify tyrosine phosphorylation pattern.⁸⁹ Samples derived from ETP-ALL patients demonstrated an upregulation of JAK-STAT signaling cascade and phosphorylation of multiple residues in the tyrosine kinase ZAP70.⁸⁹ In some cases, ruxolitinib had in vivo activity in the xenografted murine models. The authors of this study latter also reported the analysis of xenotransplants from a patient with refractory B-cell ALL that had also underwent alloHSCT.⁸⁹ The patient had increasing MRD indicative of impending relapse. Analysis revealed augmented levels of LYN kinase phosphorylation compared with samples from the patient’s stored bone marrow. Dasatinib was able to effectively inhibit LYN kinase phosphorylation. This approach would be of further interest and may offer a novel platform for discovery of tailored treatments, especially for patients with refractory disease.

The field of in vitro drug sensitivity and resistance testing (DSRT) is expanding, and can include two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) cell culture systems.⁹⁰ Such an approach has been used in hematological malignancies and has been reported in ALL.^90,91 A small single-center study used ex vivo drug response profiling for patients with advanced hematological malignancies with a rapid turnaround time (5 days).⁹² The majority of patients had lymphoid malignancies, and have received multiple lines of treatment (2–7). Encouragingly, CR and partial responses were reported. Furthermore, a patient with T-ALL (who had received already four lines of treatment) had a partial response to bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone. Although the study did not include ETP-ALL patients specifically, such an approach could be envisioned for such patients. Overall, tailored treatment approaches for patients with ETP-ALL may offer new treatment options.⁹³

Concluding remarks

ETP-ALL is a complex disease that has recently attracted attention. The optimal management remains unclear. Our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of resistance may lead to more targeted and better tolerated treatments. Results of ongoing clinical trials may shape the future treatment paradigms for ETP-ALL.

Acknowledgments

We thank Andrea Wecker for the proofreading and language editing suggestions.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD: Nikolaos Papadantonakis Inline graphic https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1943-6421

Contributor Information

Omar Castaneda Puglianini, Virginia Commonwealth University, Massey Cancer Center, Cellular Immunotherapies and Transplant Program, Richmond, Virginia, USA.

Nikolaos Papadantonakis, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University, 1365 Clifton Road, Building B, B4119, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

References

1. Guru Murthy GS, Pondaiah SK, Abedin S, et al. Incidence and survival of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the United States. Leuk Lymphoma 2019; 60: 1171–1178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. Terwilliger T, Abdul-Hay M. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a comprehensive review and 2017 update. Blood Cancer J 2017; 7: e577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3. Coustan-Smith E, Mullighan CG, Onciu M, et al. Early T-cell precursor leukaemia: a subtype of very high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Lancet Oncol 2009; 10: 147–156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood 2016; 127: 2391–2405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Shortman K, Wu L. Early T lymphocyte progenitors. Annu Rev Immunol 1996; 14: 29–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. Wang P, Peng XX, Deng X, et al. Diagnostic challenges in T-lymphoblastic lymphoma, early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia or mixed phenotype acute leukemia: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97: e12743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Chopra A, Bakhshi S, Pramanik SK, et al. Immunophenotypic analysis of T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia. A CD5-based ETP-ALL perspective of non-ETP T-ALL. Eur J Haematol 2014; 92: 211–218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Angelova E, Audette C, Kovtun Y, et al. CD123 expression patterns and selective targeting with a CD123-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (IMGN632) in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica 2019; 104: 749–755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Khogeer H, Rahman H, Jain N, et al. Early T precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma shows differential immunophenotypic characteristics including frequent CD33 expression and in vitro response to targeted CD33 therapy. Br J Haematol 2019; 186: 538–548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Khurana S, Melody ME, Ketterling RP, et al. Molecular and phenotypic characterization of an early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic lymphoma harboring PICALM-MLLT10 fusion with aberrant expression of B-cell antigens. Cancer Genet 2020; 240: 40–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11. Zuurbier L, Gutierrez A, Mullighan CG, et al. Immature MEF2C-dysregulated T-cell leukemia patients have an early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia gene signature and typically have non-rearranged T-cell receptors. Haematologica 2014; 99: 94–102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Zhang J, Ding L, Holmfeldt L, et al. The genetic basis of early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Nature 2012; 481: 157–163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Noronha EP, Marques LVC, Andrade FG, et al. The profile of immunophenotype and genotype aberrations in subsets of pediatric T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Front Oncol 2019; 9: 316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14. Liu Y, Easton J, Shao Y, et al. The genomic landscape of pediatric and young adult T-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Genet 2017; 49: 1211–1218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15. Bond J, Graux C, Lhermitte L, et al. Early response-based therapy stratification improves survival in adult early thymic precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a group for research on adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia study. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35: 2683–2691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. Kumar A, Drusbosky LM, Meacham A, et al. Computational modeling of early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ETP-ALL) to identify personalized therapy using genomics. Leuk Res 2019; 78: 3–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Meijerink JPP, Canté-Barrett K, Vroegindeweij E, et al. HOXA-activated early T-cell progenitor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: predictor of poor outcome? Haematologica 2016; 101: 654–656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. Shah BD, Borate U, Kota VK, et al. Multi-institution review of adult early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ETP-ALL). Blood 2015; 126: 3715. [Google Scholar]
19. Inukai T, Kiyokawa N, Campana D, et al. Clinical significance of early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: results of the Tokyo children’s cancer study group study L99-15. Br J Haematol 2012; 156: 358–365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20. Allen A, Sireci A, Colovai A, et al. Early T-cell precursor leukemia/lymphoma in adults and children. Leuk Res 2013; 37: 1027–1034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. Booth CAG, Jacobsen SEW, Mead AJ. Origins of ETP leukemia. Oncoscience 2018; 5: 271–272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22. Richebourg S. Early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol 2018; 21: 447–450. [Google Scholar]
23. Haydu JE, Ferrando AA. Early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ETP T-ALL). Curr Opin Hematol 2013; 20: 369–373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24. Van Vlierberghe P, Ambesi-Impiombato A, Perez-Garcia A, et al. ETV6 mutations in early immature human T cell leukemias. J Exp Med 2011; 208: 2571–2579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25. Danis E, Yamauchi T, Echanique K, et al. Ezh2 controls an early hematopoietic program and growth and survival signaling in early T cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cell Rep 2016; 14: 1953–1965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26. Wang XX, Wu D, Zhang L. Clinical and molecular characterization of early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: two cases report and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97: e13856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27. Hoelzer D, Thiel E, Arnold R, et al. Successful subtype oriented treatment strategies in adult T-All; results of 744 patients treated in three consecutive GMALL studies. Blood 2009; 114: 324–324. [Google Scholar]
28. Neumann M, Heesch S, Gökbuget N, et al. Clinical and molecular characterization of early T-cell precursor leukemia: a high-risk subgroup in adult T-ALL with a high frequency of FLT3 mutations. Blood Cancer J 2012; 2: e55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29. Jain N, Lamb AV, O’Brien S, et al. Early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ETP-ALL/LBL) in adolescents and adults: a high-risk subtype. Blood 2016; 127: 1863–1869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30. Iqbal N, Sharma A, Raina V, et al. Poor response to standard chemotherapy in early T-precursor (ETP)-ALL: a subtype of T-ALL associated with unfavourable outcome: a brief report. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus 2014; 30: 215–218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31. Bataller A, Garrote M, Oliver-Caldés A, et al. Early T-cell precursor lymphoblastic leukaemia: response to FLAG-IDA and high-dose cytarabine with sorafenib after initial refractoriness. Br J Haematol 2019; 185: 755–757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32. Khater F, Lajoie M, Langlois S, et al. KMT2E-ASNS: a novel relapse-specific fusion gene in early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2017; 129: 1729–1732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33. Richards NGJ, Kilberg MS. Asparagine synthetase chemotherapy. Annu Rev Biochem 2006; 75: 629–654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34. Appel IM, den Boer ML, Meijerink JPP, et al. Up-regulation of asparagine synthetase expression is not linked to the clinical response L-asparaginase in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2006; 107: 4244–4249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35. Tran T, Krause J. Early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia with KRAS and DNMT3A mutations and unexpected monosomy 7. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2018; 31: 511–513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36. Papadantonakis N, Advani AS. Recent advances and novel treatment paradigms in acute lymphocytic leukemia. Ther Adv Hematol 2016; 7: 252–269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37. Maude SL, Laetsch TW, Buechner J, et al. Tisagenlecleucel in children and young adults with B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 439–448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38. Faderl S, Thomas DA, O’Brien S, et al. Augmented hyper-CVAD based on dose-intensified vincristine, dexamethasone, and asparaginase in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia salvage therapy. Clin Lymphoma, Myeloma Leuk 2011; 11: 54–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39. Kadia TM, Kantarjian HM, Thomas DA, et al. Phase II study of methotrexate, vincristine, pegylated-asparaginase, and dexamethasone (MOpAD) in patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Am J Hematol 2015; 90: 120–124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40. Pathak P, Hess R, Weiss MA. Liposomal vincristine for relapsed or refractory Ph-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a review of literature. Ther Adv Hematol 2014; 5: 18–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41. Brown PA, Shah B, Fathi A, et al. NCCN guidelines insights: acute lymphoblastic leukemia, version 1.2017. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2017; 15: 1091–1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42. Kadia TM, Gandhi V. Nelarabine in the treatment of pediatric and adult patients with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoma. Expert Rev Hematol 2017; 10: 1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43. Zhu HH, Qian JJ, Hu XX, et al. CAG regimen for refractory or relapsed adult T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a retrospective, multicenter, cohort study. SSRN Electron J. Epub ahead of print 1 January 2019. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3454706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44. Yang Y, Yao S, Zhang J, et al. Decitabine-containing G-CSF priming regimen overcomes resistance of primary mediastinal neoplasm from early T-cell precursors to conventional chemotherapy: a case report. Onco Targets Ther 2019; 12: 7039–7044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45. Winter SS, Dunsmore KP, Devidas M, et al. Improved survival for children and young adults with T-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results from the children’s oncology group AALL0434 methotrexate randomization. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36: 2926–2934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46. Wood BL, Winter SS, Dunsmore KP, et al. T-lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) shows excellent outcome, lack of significance of the early thymic precursor (ETP) immunophenotype, and validation of the prognostic value of end-induction minimal residual disease (MRD) in children’s oncology group (COG) study AALL0434. Blood 2014; 124: 1.24993873 [Google Scholar]
47. Dunsmore KP, Winter S, Devidas M, et al. COG AALL0434: a randomized trial testing nelarabine in newly diagnosed T-cell malignancy. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36: 10500–10500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48. Patrick K, Wade R, Goulden N, et al. Characteristics and outcome of children and young adults with early T-precusor (ETP) ALL treated on UKALL 2003. Blood 2013; 122: 58. [Google Scholar]
49. Genescà E, Morgades M, Montesinos P, et al. Unique clinico-biological, genetic and prognostic features of adult early T cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica. Epub ahead of print 19 September 2019. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2019.225078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
50. Gooley TA, Chien JW, Pergam SA, et al. Reduced mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 2091–2101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
51. Marks DI, Wang T, Pérez WS, et al. The outcome of full-intensity and reduced-intensity conditioning matched sibling or unrelated donor transplantation in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first and second complete remission. Blood 2010; 116: 366–374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
52. Wood WA, Lee SJ, Brazauskas R, et al. Survival improvements in adolescents and young adults after myeloablative allogeneic transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2014; 20: 829–836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
53. Rowe JM. Prognostic factors in adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol 2010; 150: 389–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
54. El Fakih R, Kharfan-Dabaja MA, Aljurf M. Refining the role of hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia as novel therapies emerge. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2016; 22: 2126–2133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
55. Fielding AK, Richards SM, Chopra R, et al. Outcome of 609 adults after relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL); an MRC UKALL12/ECOG 2993 study. Blood 2007; 109: 944–950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
56. Goldstone AH, Richards SM, Lazarus HM, et al. In adults with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia, the greatest benefit is achieved from a matched sibling allogeneic transplantation in first complete remission, and an autologous transplantation is less effective than conventional consolidation/maintenance chemotherapy in all patients: final results of the international ALL trial (MRC UKALL XII/ECOG E2993). Blood 2008; 111: 1827–1833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
57. Pidala J, Djulbegovic B, Anasetti C, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first complete remission. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; 86: CD008818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
58. Giebel S, Labopin M, Socié G, et al. Improving results of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first complete remission: an analysis from the acute leukemia working party of the european society for blood and marrow transplantation. Haematologica 2017; 102: 139–149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
59. Zhu YX, Zhu MQ, Dai HP, et al. A clinical study of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in 23 patients with early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 2019; 40: 1021–1025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
60. Chen Y, Zhang L, Huang J, et al. Dasatinib and chemotherapy in a patient with early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia and NUP214-ABL1 fusion: a case report. Exp Ther Med 2017; 14: 3979–3984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
61. Testa U, Pelosi E, Castelli G. CD123 as a therapeutic target in the treatment of hematological malignancies. Cancers. Epub ahead of print 1 September 2019. DOI: 10.3390/cancers11091358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
62. Cummins KD, Gill S. Anti-CD123 chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CART): an evolving treatment strategy for hematological malignancies, and a potential ace-in-the-hole against antigen-negative relapse. Leuk Lymphoma 2018; 59: 1539–1553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
63. Du W, Li J, Liu W, et al. Interleukin-3 receptor α chain (CD123) is preferentially expressed in immature T-ALL and may not associate with outcomes of chemotherapy. Tumor Biol 2016; 37: 3817–3821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
64. Maude SL, Dolai S, Delgado-Martin C, et al. Efficacy of JAK/STAT pathway inhibition in murine xenograft models of early T-cell precursor (ETP) acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2015; 125: 1759–1767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
65. Touzeau C, Moreau P. Daratumumab for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2017; 17: 887–893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
66. Plesner T, Krejcik J. Daratumumab for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Front Immunol 2018; 9: 1228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
67. Bride KL, Vincent TL, Im SY, et al. Preclinical efficacy of daratumumab in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2018; 131: 995–999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
68. Mirgh S, Ahmed R, Agrawal N, et al. Will Daratumumab be the next game changer in early thymic precursor-acute lymphoblastic leukaemia? Br J Haematol 2019; 187: e33–e35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
69. Bonda A, Punatar S, Gokarn A, et al. Daratumumab at the frontiers of post-transplant refractory T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia-a worthwhile strategy? Bone Marrow Transplant 2018; 53: 1487–1489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
70. Leyfman Y. Chimeric antigen receptors: unleashing a new age of anti-cancer therapy. Cancer Cell Int 2018; 18: 182–186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
71. Lulla PD, Mamonkin M, Brenner MK. Adoptive cell therapy for acute myeloid leukemia and T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer J 2019; 25: 199–207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
72. Sánchez-Martínez D, Baroni ML, Gutierrez-Agüera F, et al. Fratricide-resistant CD1a-specific CAR T cells for the treatment of cortical T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2019; 133: 2291-2304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
73. Mamonkin M, Rouce RH, Tashiro H, et al. A T-cell-directed chimeric antigen receptor for the selective treatment of T-cell malignancies. Blood 2015; 126: 983–992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
74. Oelsner S, Friede ME, Zhang C, et al. Continuously expanding CAR NK-92 cells display selective cytotoxicity against B-cell leukemia and lymphoma. Cytotherapy 2017; 19: 235–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
75. Mensali N, Dillard P, Hebeisen M, et al. NK cells specifically TCR-dressed to kill cancer cells. EBioMedicine 2019; 40: 106–117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
76. Liu E, Marin D, Banerjee P, et al. Use of CAR-transduced natural killer cells in CD19-positive lymphoid tumors. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: 545–553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
77. Paul S, Lal G. Development and function of natural killer cells and its importance in cancer immunotherapy. In: Hayat MA. (ed.) Immunology Volume 1: Immunotoxicology, Immunopathology, and Immunotherapy. London: Academic Press, 2018; 1: 117–140. [Google Scholar]
78. You F, Wang Y, Jiang L, et al. A novel CD7 chimeric antigen receptor-modified NK-92MI cell line targeting T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Am J Cancer Res 2019; 9: 64–78. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
79. Rotolo R, Leuci V, Donini C, et al. Car-based strategies beyond T lymphocytes: integrative opportunities for cancer adoptive immunotherapy. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20: 2839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
80. Yogarajah M, Stone RM. A concise review of BCL-2 inhibition in acute myeloid leukemia. Expert Rev Hematol 2018; 11: 145–154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
81. Perini GF, Ribeiro GN, Pinto Neto JV, et al. BCL-2 as therapeutic target for hematological malignancies. J Hematol Oncol 2018; 11: 65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
82. DiNardo CD, Pratz K, Pullarkat V, et al. Venetoclax combined with decitabine or azacitidine in treatment-naive, elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2019; 133: 7–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
83. Numan Y, Alfayez M, Maiti A, et al. First report of clinical response to Venetoclax in early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. JCO Precis Oncol 2018; 2: 1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
84. Rahmat LT, Nguyen A, Abdulhaq H, et al. Venetoclax in combination with decitabine for relapsed T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. Case Rep Hematol 2018; 2018: 1–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
85. La Starza R, Cambò B, Pierini A, et al. Venetoclax and bortezomib in relapsed/refractory early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. JCO Precis Oncol. Epub ahead of print 20 September 2019. DOI: DOI: 10.1200/PO.19.00172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
86. Follini E, Marchesini M, Roti G. Strategies to overcome resistance mechanisms in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20: 3021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
87. Li Z, He S, Look AT. The MCL1-specific inhibitor S63845 acts synergistically with venetoclax/ABT-199 to induce apoptosis in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Leukemia 2019; 33: 262–266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
88. Frismantas V, Dobay MP, Rinaldi A, et al. Ex vivo drug response profiling detects recurrent sensitivity patterns in drug-resistant acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2017; 129: e26–e37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
89. Dolai S, Sia KCS, Robbins AK, et al. Quantitative phosphotyrosine profiling of patient-derived xenografts identifies therapeutic targets in pediatric leukemia. Cancer Res 2016; 76: 2766–2777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
90. Popova AA, Levkin PA. Precision medicine in oncology: in vitro drug sensitivity and resistance test (DSRT) for selection of personalized anticancer therapy. Adv Ther 2020; 3: 1900100. [Google Scholar]
91. Guo J, Zhao C, Yao R, et al. 3D culture enhances chemoresistance of ALL Jurkat cell line by increasing DDR1 expression. Exp Ther Med 2019; 17: 1593–1600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
92. Snijder B, Vladimer GI, Krall N, et al. Image-based ex-vivo drug screening for patients with aggressive haematological malignancies: interim results from a single-arm, open-label, pilot study. Lancet Haematol 2017; 4: e595–e606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
93. Bassan R, Bourquin JP, DeAngelo DJ, et al. New approaches to the management of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36: 3504–3519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr1-2040620720929475] 1. Guru Murthy GS, Pondaiah SK, Abedin S, et al. Incidence and survival of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the United States. Leuk Lymphoma 2019; 60: 1171–1178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr2-2040620720929475] 2. Terwilliger T, Abdul-Hay M. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a comprehensive review and 2017 update. Blood Cancer J 2017; 7: e577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr3-2040620720929475] 3. Coustan-Smith E, Mullighan CG, Onciu M, et al. Early T-cell precursor leukaemia: a subtype of very high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Lancet Oncol 2009; 10: 147–156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr4-2040620720929475] 4. Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood 2016; 127: 2391–2405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr5-2040620720929475] 5. Shortman K, Wu L. Early T lymphocyte progenitors. Annu Rev Immunol 1996; 14: 29–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr6-2040620720929475] 6. Wang P, Peng XX, Deng X, et al. Diagnostic challenges in T-lymphoblastic lymphoma, early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia or mixed phenotype acute leukemia: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97: e12743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr7-2040620720929475] 7. Chopra A, Bakhshi S, Pramanik SK, et al. Immunophenotypic analysis of T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia. A CD5-based ETP-ALL perspective of non-ETP T-ALL. Eur J Haematol 2014; 92: 211–218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr8-2040620720929475] 8. Angelova E, Audette C, Kovtun Y, et al. CD123 expression patterns and selective targeting with a CD123-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (IMGN632) in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica 2019; 104: 749–755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr9-2040620720929475] 9. Khogeer H, Rahman H, Jain N, et al. Early T precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma shows differential immunophenotypic characteristics including frequent CD33 expression and in vitro response to targeted CD33 therapy. Br J Haematol 2019; 186: 538–548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr10-2040620720929475] 10. Khurana S, Melody ME, Ketterling RP, et al. Molecular and phenotypic characterization of an early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic lymphoma harboring PICALM-MLLT10 fusion with aberrant expression of B-cell antigens. Cancer Genet 2020; 240: 40–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr11-2040620720929475] 11. Zuurbier L, Gutierrez A, Mullighan CG, et al. Immature MEF2C-dysregulated T-cell leukemia patients have an early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia gene signature and typically have non-rearranged T-cell receptors. Haematologica 2014; 99: 94–102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr12-2040620720929475] 12. Zhang J, Ding L, Holmfeldt L, et al. The genetic basis of early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Nature 2012; 481: 157–163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr13-2040620720929475] 13. Noronha EP, Marques LVC, Andrade FG, et al. The profile of immunophenotype and genotype aberrations in subsets of pediatric T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Front Oncol 2019; 9: 316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr14-2040620720929475] 14. Liu Y, Easton J, Shao Y, et al. The genomic landscape of pediatric and young adult T-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Genet 2017; 49: 1211–1218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr15-2040620720929475] 15. Bond J, Graux C, Lhermitte L, et al. Early response-based therapy stratification improves survival in adult early thymic precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a group for research on adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia study. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35: 2683–2691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr16-2040620720929475] 16. Kumar A, Drusbosky LM, Meacham A, et al. Computational modeling of early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ETP-ALL) to identify personalized therapy using genomics. Leuk Res 2019; 78: 3–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr17-2040620720929475] 17. Meijerink JPP, Canté-Barrett K, Vroegindeweij E, et al. HOXA-activated early T-cell progenitor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: predictor of poor outcome? Haematologica 2016; 101: 654–656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr18-2040620720929475] 18. Shah BD, Borate U, Kota VK, et al. Multi-institution review of adult early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ETP-ALL). Blood 2015; 126: 3715. [Google Scholar]

[bibr19-2040620720929475] 19. Inukai T, Kiyokawa N, Campana D, et al. Clinical significance of early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: results of the Tokyo children’s cancer study group study L99-15. Br J Haematol 2012; 156: 358–365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr20-2040620720929475] 20. Allen A, Sireci A, Colovai A, et al. Early T-cell precursor leukemia/lymphoma in adults and children. Leuk Res 2013; 37: 1027–1034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr21-2040620720929475] 21. Booth CAG, Jacobsen SEW, Mead AJ. Origins of ETP leukemia. Oncoscience 2018; 5: 271–272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr22-2040620720929475] 22. Richebourg S. Early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol 2018; 21: 447–450. [Google Scholar]

[bibr23-2040620720929475] 23. Haydu JE, Ferrando AA. Early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ETP T-ALL). Curr Opin Hematol 2013; 20: 369–373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr24-2040620720929475] 24. Van Vlierberghe P, Ambesi-Impiombato A, Perez-Garcia A, et al. ETV6 mutations in early immature human T cell leukemias. J Exp Med 2011; 208: 2571–2579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr25-2040620720929475] 25. Danis E, Yamauchi T, Echanique K, et al. Ezh2 controls an early hematopoietic program and growth and survival signaling in early T cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cell Rep 2016; 14: 1953–1965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr26-2040620720929475] 26. Wang XX, Wu D, Zhang L. Clinical and molecular characterization of early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: two cases report and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97: e13856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr27-2040620720929475] 27. Hoelzer D, Thiel E, Arnold R, et al. Successful subtype oriented treatment strategies in adult T-All; results of 744 patients treated in three consecutive GMALL studies. Blood 2009; 114: 324–324. [Google Scholar]

[bibr28-2040620720929475] 28. Neumann M, Heesch S, Gökbuget N, et al. Clinical and molecular characterization of early T-cell precursor leukemia: a high-risk subgroup in adult T-ALL with a high frequency of FLT3 mutations. Blood Cancer J 2012; 2: e55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr29-2040620720929475] 29. Jain N, Lamb AV, O’Brien S, et al. Early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ETP-ALL/LBL) in adolescents and adults: a high-risk subtype. Blood 2016; 127: 1863–1869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr30-2040620720929475] 30. Iqbal N, Sharma A, Raina V, et al. Poor response to standard chemotherapy in early T-precursor (ETP)-ALL: a subtype of T-ALL associated with unfavourable outcome: a brief report. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus 2014; 30: 215–218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr31-2040620720929475] 31. Bataller A, Garrote M, Oliver-Caldés A, et al. Early T-cell precursor lymphoblastic leukaemia: response to FLAG-IDA and high-dose cytarabine with sorafenib after initial refractoriness. Br J Haematol 2019; 185: 755–757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr32-2040620720929475] 32. Khater F, Lajoie M, Langlois S, et al. KMT2E-ASNS: a novel relapse-specific fusion gene in early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2017; 129: 1729–1732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr33-2040620720929475] 33. Richards NGJ, Kilberg MS. Asparagine synthetase chemotherapy. Annu Rev Biochem 2006; 75: 629–654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr34-2040620720929475] 34. Appel IM, den Boer ML, Meijerink JPP, et al. Up-regulation of asparagine synthetase expression is not linked to the clinical response L-asparaginase in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2006; 107: 4244–4249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr35-2040620720929475] 35. Tran T, Krause J. Early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia with KRAS and DNMT3A mutations and unexpected monosomy 7. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2018; 31: 511–513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr36-2040620720929475] 36. Papadantonakis N, Advani AS. Recent advances and novel treatment paradigms in acute lymphocytic leukemia. Ther Adv Hematol 2016; 7: 252–269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr37-2040620720929475] 37. Maude SL, Laetsch TW, Buechner J, et al. Tisagenlecleucel in children and young adults with B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 439–448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr38-2040620720929475] 38. Faderl S, Thomas DA, O’Brien S, et al. Augmented hyper-CVAD based on dose-intensified vincristine, dexamethasone, and asparaginase in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia salvage therapy. Clin Lymphoma, Myeloma Leuk 2011; 11: 54–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr39-2040620720929475] 39. Kadia TM, Kantarjian HM, Thomas DA, et al. Phase II study of methotrexate, vincristine, pegylated-asparaginase, and dexamethasone (MOpAD) in patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Am J Hematol 2015; 90: 120–124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr40-2040620720929475] 40. Pathak P, Hess R, Weiss MA. Liposomal vincristine for relapsed or refractory Ph-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a review of literature. Ther Adv Hematol 2014; 5: 18–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr41-2040620720929475] 41. Brown PA, Shah B, Fathi A, et al. NCCN guidelines insights: acute lymphoblastic leukemia, version 1.2017. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2017; 15: 1091–1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr42-2040620720929475] 42. Kadia TM, Gandhi V. Nelarabine in the treatment of pediatric and adult patients with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoma. Expert Rev Hematol 2017; 10: 1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr43-2040620720929475] 43. Zhu HH, Qian JJ, Hu XX, et al. CAG regimen for refractory or relapsed adult T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a retrospective, multicenter, cohort study. SSRN Electron J. Epub ahead of print 1 January 2019. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3454706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr44-2040620720929475] 44. Yang Y, Yao S, Zhang J, et al. Decitabine-containing G-CSF priming regimen overcomes resistance of primary mediastinal neoplasm from early T-cell precursors to conventional chemotherapy: a case report. Onco Targets Ther 2019; 12: 7039–7044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr45-2040620720929475] 45. Winter SS, Dunsmore KP, Devidas M, et al. Improved survival for children and young adults with T-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results from the children’s oncology group AALL0434 methotrexate randomization. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36: 2926–2934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr46-2040620720929475] 46. Wood BL, Winter SS, Dunsmore KP, et al. T-lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) shows excellent outcome, lack of significance of the early thymic precursor (ETP) immunophenotype, and validation of the prognostic value of end-induction minimal residual disease (MRD) in children’s oncology group (COG) study AALL0434. Blood 2014; 124: 1.24993873 [Google Scholar]

[bibr47-2040620720929475] 47. Dunsmore KP, Winter S, Devidas M, et al. COG AALL0434: a randomized trial testing nelarabine in newly diagnosed T-cell malignancy. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36: 10500–10500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr48-2040620720929475] 48. Patrick K, Wade R, Goulden N, et al. Characteristics and outcome of children and young adults with early T-precusor (ETP) ALL treated on UKALL 2003. Blood 2013; 122: 58. [Google Scholar]

[bibr49-2040620720929475] 49. Genescà E, Morgades M, Montesinos P, et al. Unique clinico-biological, genetic and prognostic features of adult early T cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica. Epub ahead of print 19 September 2019. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2019.225078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr50-2040620720929475] 50. Gooley TA, Chien JW, Pergam SA, et al. Reduced mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 2091–2101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr51-2040620720929475] 51. Marks DI, Wang T, Pérez WS, et al. The outcome of full-intensity and reduced-intensity conditioning matched sibling or unrelated donor transplantation in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first and second complete remission. Blood 2010; 116: 366–374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr52-2040620720929475] 52. Wood WA, Lee SJ, Brazauskas R, et al. Survival improvements in adolescents and young adults after myeloablative allogeneic transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2014; 20: 829–836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr53-2040620720929475] 53. Rowe JM. Prognostic factors in adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol 2010; 150: 389–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr54-2040620720929475] 54. El Fakih R, Kharfan-Dabaja MA, Aljurf M. Refining the role of hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia as novel therapies emerge. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2016; 22: 2126–2133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr55-2040620720929475] 55. Fielding AK, Richards SM, Chopra R, et al. Outcome of 609 adults after relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL); an MRC UKALL12/ECOG 2993 study. Blood 2007; 109: 944–950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr56-2040620720929475] 56. Goldstone AH, Richards SM, Lazarus HM, et al. In adults with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia, the greatest benefit is achieved from a matched sibling allogeneic transplantation in first complete remission, and an autologous transplantation is less effective than conventional consolidation/maintenance chemotherapy in all patients: final results of the international ALL trial (MRC UKALL XII/ECOG E2993). Blood 2008; 111: 1827–1833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr57-2040620720929475] 57. Pidala J, Djulbegovic B, Anasetti C, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first complete remission. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; 86: CD008818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr58-2040620720929475] 58. Giebel S, Labopin M, Socié G, et al. Improving results of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first complete remission: an analysis from the acute leukemia working party of the european society for blood and marrow transplantation. Haematologica 2017; 102: 139–149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr59-2040620720929475] 59. Zhu YX, Zhu MQ, Dai HP, et al. A clinical study of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in 23 patients with early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 2019; 40: 1021–1025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr60-2040620720929475] 60. Chen Y, Zhang L, Huang J, et al. Dasatinib and chemotherapy in a patient with early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia and NUP214-ABL1 fusion: a case report. Exp Ther Med 2017; 14: 3979–3984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr61-2040620720929475] 61. Testa U, Pelosi E, Castelli G. CD123 as a therapeutic target in the treatment of hematological malignancies. Cancers. Epub ahead of print 1 September 2019. DOI: 10.3390/cancers11091358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr62-2040620720929475] 62. Cummins KD, Gill S. Anti-CD123 chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CART): an evolving treatment strategy for hematological malignancies, and a potential ace-in-the-hole against antigen-negative relapse. Leuk Lymphoma 2018; 59: 1539–1553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr63-2040620720929475] 63. Du W, Li J, Liu W, et al. Interleukin-3 receptor α chain (CD123) is preferentially expressed in immature T-ALL and may not associate with outcomes of chemotherapy. Tumor Biol 2016; 37: 3817–3821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr64-2040620720929475] 64. Maude SL, Dolai S, Delgado-Martin C, et al. Efficacy of JAK/STAT pathway inhibition in murine xenograft models of early T-cell precursor (ETP) acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2015; 125: 1759–1767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr65-2040620720929475] 65. Touzeau C, Moreau P. Daratumumab for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2017; 17: 887–893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr66-2040620720929475] 66. Plesner T, Krejcik J. Daratumumab for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Front Immunol 2018; 9: 1228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr67-2040620720929475] 67. Bride KL, Vincent TL, Im SY, et al. Preclinical efficacy of daratumumab in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2018; 131: 995–999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr68-2040620720929475] 68. Mirgh S, Ahmed R, Agrawal N, et al. Will Daratumumab be the next game changer in early thymic precursor-acute lymphoblastic leukaemia? Br J Haematol 2019; 187: e33–e35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr69-2040620720929475] 69. Bonda A, Punatar S, Gokarn A, et al. Daratumumab at the frontiers of post-transplant refractory T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia-a worthwhile strategy? Bone Marrow Transplant 2018; 53: 1487–1489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr70-2040620720929475] 70. Leyfman Y. Chimeric antigen receptors: unleashing a new age of anti-cancer therapy. Cancer Cell Int 2018; 18: 182–186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr71-2040620720929475] 71. Lulla PD, Mamonkin M, Brenner MK. Adoptive cell therapy for acute myeloid leukemia and T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer J 2019; 25: 199–207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr72-2040620720929475] 72. Sánchez-Martínez D, Baroni ML, Gutierrez-Agüera F, et al. Fratricide-resistant CD1a-specific CAR T cells for the treatment of cortical T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2019; 133: 2291-2304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr73-2040620720929475] 73. Mamonkin M, Rouce RH, Tashiro H, et al. A T-cell-directed chimeric antigen receptor for the selective treatment of T-cell malignancies. Blood 2015; 126: 983–992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr74-2040620720929475] 74. Oelsner S, Friede ME, Zhang C, et al. Continuously expanding CAR NK-92 cells display selective cytotoxicity against B-cell leukemia and lymphoma. Cytotherapy 2017; 19: 235–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr75-2040620720929475] 75. Mensali N, Dillard P, Hebeisen M, et al. NK cells specifically TCR-dressed to kill cancer cells. EBioMedicine 2019; 40: 106–117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr76-2040620720929475] 76. Liu E, Marin D, Banerjee P, et al. Use of CAR-transduced natural killer cells in CD19-positive lymphoid tumors. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: 545–553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr77-2040620720929475] 77. Paul S, Lal G. Development and function of natural killer cells and its importance in cancer immunotherapy. In: Hayat MA. (ed.) Immunology Volume 1: Immunotoxicology, Immunopathology, and Immunotherapy. London: Academic Press, 2018; 1: 117–140. [Google Scholar]

[bibr78-2040620720929475] 78. You F, Wang Y, Jiang L, et al. A novel CD7 chimeric antigen receptor-modified NK-92MI cell line targeting T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Am J Cancer Res 2019; 9: 64–78. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr79-2040620720929475] 79. Rotolo R, Leuci V, Donini C, et al. Car-based strategies beyond T lymphocytes: integrative opportunities for cancer adoptive immunotherapy. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20: 2839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr80-2040620720929475] 80. Yogarajah M, Stone RM. A concise review of BCL-2 inhibition in acute myeloid leukemia. Expert Rev Hematol 2018; 11: 145–154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr81-2040620720929475] 81. Perini GF, Ribeiro GN, Pinto Neto JV, et al. BCL-2 as therapeutic target for hematological malignancies. J Hematol Oncol 2018; 11: 65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr82-2040620720929475] 82. DiNardo CD, Pratz K, Pullarkat V, et al. Venetoclax combined with decitabine or azacitidine in treatment-naive, elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2019; 133: 7–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr83-2040620720929475] 83. Numan Y, Alfayez M, Maiti A, et al. First report of clinical response to Venetoclax in early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. JCO Precis Oncol 2018; 2: 1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr84-2040620720929475] 84. Rahmat LT, Nguyen A, Abdulhaq H, et al. Venetoclax in combination with decitabine for relapsed T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. Case Rep Hematol 2018; 2018: 1–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr85-2040620720929475] 85. La Starza R, Cambò B, Pierini A, et al. Venetoclax and bortezomib in relapsed/refractory early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. JCO Precis Oncol. Epub ahead of print 20 September 2019. DOI: DOI: 10.1200/PO.19.00172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr86-2040620720929475] 86. Follini E, Marchesini M, Roti G. Strategies to overcome resistance mechanisms in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20: 3021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr87-2040620720929475] 87. Li Z, He S, Look AT. The MCL1-specific inhibitor S63845 acts synergistically with venetoclax/ABT-199 to induce apoptosis in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Leukemia 2019; 33: 262–266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr88-2040620720929475] 88. Frismantas V, Dobay MP, Rinaldi A, et al. Ex vivo drug response profiling detects recurrent sensitivity patterns in drug-resistant acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2017; 129: e26–e37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr89-2040620720929475] 89. Dolai S, Sia KCS, Robbins AK, et al. Quantitative phosphotyrosine profiling of patient-derived xenografts identifies therapeutic targets in pediatric leukemia. Cancer Res 2016; 76: 2766–2777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr90-2040620720929475] 90. Popova AA, Levkin PA. Precision medicine in oncology: in vitro drug sensitivity and resistance test (DSRT) for selection of personalized anticancer therapy. Adv Ther 2020; 3: 1900100. [Google Scholar]

[bibr91-2040620720929475] 91. Guo J, Zhao C, Yao R, et al. 3D culture enhances chemoresistance of ALL Jurkat cell line by increasing DDR1 expression. Exp Ther Med 2019; 17: 1593–1600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr92-2040620720929475] 92. Snijder B, Vladimer GI, Krall N, et al. Image-based ex-vivo drug screening for patients with aggressive haematological malignancies: interim results from a single-arm, open-label, pilot study. Lancet Haematol 2017; 4: e595–e606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bibr93-2040620720929475] 93. Bassan R, Bourquin JP, DeAngelo DJ, et al. New approaches to the management of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36: 3504–3519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

PERMALINK

Early precursor T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: current paradigms and evolving concepts

Omar Castaneda Puglianini

Nikolaos Papadantonakis

Abstract

Introduction

ETP-ALL: a distinct entity of T-cell ALL

Outcomes of conventional chemotherapy are suboptimal in adult ETP-ALL patients

The role of alloHSCT in the management of ETP-ALL

Novel treatment and approaches

Dasatinib

CD123 targeting approaches

Ruxolitinib

Daratumumab

Cellular therapy: CAR T and NK cells

Targeting CD33

Venetoclax

Tailored treatments (precision oncology)

Concluding remarks

Acknowledgments

Footnotes

Contributor Information

References

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Cite

Add to Collections

PERMALINK

Early precursor T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: current paradigms and evolving concepts

Omar Castaneda Puglianini

Nikolaos Papadantonakis

Abstract

Introduction

ETP-ALL: a distinct entity of T-cell ALL

Outcomes of conventional chemotherapy are suboptimal in adult ETP-ALL patients

The role of alloHSCT in the management of ETP-ALL

Novel treatment and approaches

Dasatinib

CD123 targeting approaches

Ruxolitinib

Daratumumab

Cellular therapy: CAR T and NK cells

Targeting CD33

Venetoclax

Tailored treatments (precision oncology)

Concluding remarks

Acknowledgments

Footnotes

Contributor Information

References

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases