Skip to main content
Experimental Biology and Medicine logoLink to Experimental Biology and Medicine
. 2020 Mar 6;245(4):269–272. doi: 10.1177/1535370220909543

Biomedical optical imaging technology and applications: From basic research toward clinical diagnosis

Shuliang Jiao 1,
PMCID: PMC7370594  PMID: 32141780

Biomedical optical imaging technologies are playing an indispensable role in basic research and clinical diagnosis owing to their superior spatial resolution, rich imaging contrasts, and non-ionizing properties of the light radiation. Biomedical optical imaging technologies rely on the interaction of light with biological tissues, the subject of biomedical optics, to provide contrast to reveal the features of interest of a sample. When interacting with biological tissues, the properties of the incident photons like amplitude/intensity, phase, polarization states, and wavelength may be modified by scattering, absorption, tissue birefringence, fluorescence, and nonlinear effects. All these changes of the light properties may provide specific contrasts for imaging the structure or function of biological tissues.

Optical coherence tomography (OCT)15 and photoacoustic tomography (PAT)610 are two representative novel optical imaging technologies that can provide high-resolution (micrometer scale) three-dimensional (3D) structural and functional imaging of biological tissues. OCT is a low-coherence interferometry-based optical imaging technology that uses coherence gating to achieve depth resolution. Conventionally, OCT uses a Michelson interferometer, either optical fiber-based or in free space, illuminated with a broadband light source to get the interference signal between the backscattered light from a sample in the sample arm and the reflected light from the reference arm. Although first invented in 1991,1 time-domain OCT was not well accepted in the clinics until the invention of the spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT), which was reported first in 1995 and well recognized since 2003.2,3,1113

There are different branches of OCT technology for imaging different bio-parameters by using different contrast mechanisms. Conventional OCT images the structure of biological tissues by using the signal intensity contrast, which depends on the optical boundaries formed by regions with different optical properties.14,15 Polarization-sensitive OCT,16,17 including Mueller-matrix OCT and Jones-matrix OCT,1821 images the polarization properties of a sample like amplitude and orientation of birefringence. Optical Doppler tomography2224 or Doppler OCT images the flow speed of moving particles like the red blood cells inside a blood vessel. OCT angiography (OCTA)2527 is a recently developed technology to image the structures of the blood vessels with sensitivity high enough to image the capillaries, which uses the moving-induced decorrelation of the interference signals as contrast. Optical coherence elastography (OCE)28,29 is a new branch of OCT to measure the mechanical properties of biological tissues by taking advantage of the high spatial resolution of OCT to measure the small displacement induced by pressure.

OCT has found clinical and preclinical applications in various medical fields such as ophthalmology,3037 cardiology,3840 neurology,4143 gynecology,44,45 dermatology,4648 dentistry,49,50 developmental biology,51 urology,5254 gastroenterology,5557 etc. OCT has been used to measure the oxygen saturation in blood vessels by extracting the spectral information in the interference signals.5860 OCT can provide molecular contrasts in a multimodal imaging system to quantify the concentration of molecules like rhodopsin and lipofuscin in the retina.6165 OCT was used to measure the intrinsic signals of the photoreceptors.66,67 Currently, OCT has established its role in the forefront in ophthalmology for the diagnosis and monitoring progression of all kinds of retinal diseases. The clinical applications of OCT in other medical fields are also under investigation.

In this thematic issue, we have gathered research and mini-review articles in the fields of PS-OCT, OCE, OCTA, and novel applications of OCT. The paper by Yao and Duan68 presented a review on the recent developments of high-resolution 3D optical tractography using Jones-matrix PS-OCT. Tractography is a specialized imaging technology that can reveal the detailed fiber architecture of fibrous tissues. Recent developments have demonstrated the feasibility of extracting the depth resolved local optic axis from PS-OCT measurements using Jones-matrix calculus. The obtained optic axis data can then be used to construct 3D tractography in a variety of tissues including heart, skeletal muscle, cartilage, and artery. This new tractography technology is also termed optical polarization tractography.

Qian et al.69 presented a new method of evaluating the posterior eye elasticity in vivo by using a shaker-based OCE. They validated the technique by imaging both phantoms and rabbit eyes in vivo. Su et al.70 reported their investigations on retinal neurovascular responses to transcorneal electrical stimulation (TES). By using SD-OCT to measure the intrinsic optical signal (IOS) and the blood flow parameters, they were able to record simultaneously the neural and vascular responses of the retina to TES in vivo. They have found that TES mainly induced neural responses in the retina while no significant vascular responses were evoked. These results provided insights to the mechanism of retinal neurovascular coupling in response to TES. Yao et al.71 reviewed the current progress of quantitative OCTA, which extracts quantitative measures of the vasculature parameters from OCTA images, including blood vessel tortuosity, blood vessel caliber, blood vessel density, vessel perimeter index, fovea avascular zone area, FAZ contour irregularity, vessel branching coefficient, vessel branching angle, branching width ratio, and choroidal vascular analysis. These quantitative measures are proved to be useful for the diagnosis of various retinal diseases.

PAT is a scalable imaging technology, which has two major branches: photoacoustic microscopy (PAM) and photoacoustic computed tomography.6 PAT uses the photoacoustic effect to generate an image. When illuminated by pulsed or intensity-modulated laser light with a wavelength within the absorption spectrum of a sample, the absorbed light energy is converted to heat, inducing a transient temperature increase. Upon thermal relaxation, an ultrasonic wave is generated, which can be detected by using an ultrasonic transducer. The time-of-flight of the detected ultrasonic wave tells the depth information of the origin of the wave, thus the location of the absorber, e.g. the red blood cells in a blood vessel. The lateral resolution of PAM can be either the size of the light focus in the superficial region (the ballistic scattering regime) or the size of the ultrasonic focus in deeper regions where the incident light is diffused (optical quasidiffusive or diffusive regime). The majority of PAT technologies have been intensively studied for preclinical imaging of animal models.

Zhang et al.72 investigated the technical feasibility of transrectal PAT for prostate cancer imaging by using ICG as a contrast agent, light illumination from an LED array via the urethral track, and a commercial linear array ultrasonic transducer. They conducted experiments on a clinically relevant ex vivo model including whole human prostates harvested from radical prostatectomy. Their imaging results showed that tubes containing ICG solution at different concentrations could be detected at different positions in the prostate within a 2 cm range from the urethral wall, an imaging range that can possibly cover the entire prostate.

In the paper of Kim et al.,73 new updates to improve the clinical usability of a real-time clinical photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging system were reported. These updates allow optimization of all imaging parameters while continuously acquiring the photoacoustic and ultrasound images in real-time. The updated system has great potential to be used in a variety of clinical applications such as assessing the malignancy of thyroid cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma.

In the article of Karthikesh and Yang,74 technologies of photoacoustic image-guided interventions were reviewed. They reviewed the potentials of photoacoustic imaging in guiding active and passive drug deliveries, photothermal therapy, and other surgeries and therapies using endogenous and exogenous contrast agents including organic, inorganic, and hybrid nanoparticles, as well as needle-based biopsy procedures. The advantages of photoacoustic imaging in guided interventions were discussed.

Dadkhah and Jiao75 reported a PAM-based multimodal imaging technology, which integrated PAM, OCT, OCTA, and fluorescence microscopy in a single platform. The reported system was able to image complementary features of a biological sample by combining different contrast mechanisms.

In addition to the OCT and PAT technology and their applications, this thematic issue also features articles that use novel optical imaging as a key technology for research. Li et al.76 investigated application of intrinsic nonlinear optical imaging such as two-photon excited autofluorescence and second harmonic generation (SHG) microscopy to quantitatively assess chondrocyte viability in articular cartilage. Lu et al.77 applied time-lapse near-infrared light microscopy to monitor the spatiotemporal dynamics of the IOS responses in freshly isolated retinas activated by visible light stimulation. Nesmith et al.78 reported the use of optical method to map the electromechanics in intact organs. Massett et al.79 used SHG and total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy to investigate the loss of smooth muscle α-actin effects on mechanosensing and cell-matrix adhesions.

In summary, although only covered a limited number of optical imaging technologies and their applications, this thematic issue would help us perceive the power and significance of optical imaging technologies in clinical diagnosis and biomedical research. This thematic issue will also help attract future publications of biomedical optical imaging related articles in Experimental Biology and Medicine.

DECLARATION OF CONFLICTING INTERESTS

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

FUNDING

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Shuliang Jiao https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3690-3722

References

  • 1.Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, Schuman JS, Stinson WG, Chang W, Hee MR, Flotte T, Gregory K, Puliafito CA, Fujimoto JG. Optical coherence tomography. Science 1991; 254:1178–81 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fercher AF, Hitzenberger CK, Kamp G, Elzaiat SY. Measurement of intraocular distances by backscattering spectral interferometry. Opt Commun 1995; 117:43–8 [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wojtkowski M, Leitgeb R, Kowalczyk A, Bajraszewski T, Fercher AF. In vivo human retinal imaging by Fourier domain optical coherence tomography. J Biomed Opt 2002; 7:457–63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wojtkowski M, Srinivasan VJ, Ko TH, Fujimoto JG, Kowalczyk A, Duker JS. Ultrahigh-resolution, high-speed, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography and methods for dispersion compensation. Opt Express 2004; 12:2404–22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Park BH, Pierce MC, Cense B, Yun SH, Mujat M, Tearney GJ, Bouma BE, de Boer JF. Real-time fiber-based multi-functional spectral-domain optical coherence tomography at 1.3 mu m. Optics express 2005;13:3931–44 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wang LHV, Hu S. Photoacoustic tomography: in vivo imaging from organelles to organs. Science 2012; 335:1458–62 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Xu MH, Wang LV. Analytic explanation of spatial resolution related to bandwidth and detector aperture size in thermoacoustic or photoacoustic reconstruction. Phys Rev E 2003; 67:056605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wang LV. Tutorial on photoacoustic microscopy and computed tomography. IEEE J Select Topics Quantum Electron 2008; 14:171–9 [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhang HF, Maslov K, Stoica G, Wang LV. Functional photoacoustic microscopy for high-resolution and noninvasive in vivo imaging. Nat Biotechnol 2006; 24:848–51 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhang HF, Maslov K, Li ML, Stoica G, Wang LV. In vivo volumetric imaging of subcutaneous microvasculature by photoacoustic microscopy. Opt Express 2006; 14:9317–23 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.de Boer JF, Cense B, Park BH, Pierce MC, Tearney GJ, Bouma BE. Improved signal-to-noise ratio in spectral-domain compared with time-domain optical coherence tomography. Opt Lett 2003; 28:2067–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.White BR, Pierce MC, Nassif N, Cense B, Park BH, Tearney GJ, Bouma BE, Chen TC, de Boer JF. In vivo dynamic human retinal blood flow imaging using ultra-high-speed spectral domain optical Doppler tomography. Opt Express 2003; 11:3490–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yun SH, Tearney GJ, de Boer JF, Iftimia N, Bouma BE. High-speed optical frequency-domain imaging. Opt Express 2003; 11:2953–63 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pan YT, Birngruber R, Rosperich J, Engelhardt R. Low-coherence optical tomography in turbid tissue – theoretical-analysis. Appl Opt 1995; 34:6564–74 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pan YT, Birngruber R, Engelhardt R. Contrast limits of coherence-gated imaging in scattering media. Appl Opt 1997; 36:2979–83 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hee MR, Huang D, Swanson EA, Fujimoto JG. Polarization-sensitive low-coherence reflectometer for birefringence characterization and ranging. J Opt Soc Am B 1992; 9:903–8 [Google Scholar]
  • 17.de Boer JF, Srinivas SM, Malekafzali A, Chen ZP, Nelson JS. Imaging thermally damaged tissue by polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography. Opt Express 1998; 3:212–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jiao SL, Yao G, Wang L. Depth-resolved two-dimensional stokes vectors of backscattered light and Mueller matrices of biological tissue measured with optical coherence tomography. Appl Opt 2000; 39:6318–24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jiao SL, Wang L. Jones-matrix imaging of biological tissues with quadruple-channel optical coherence tomography. J Biomed Opt 2002; 7:350–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jiao SL, Wang LHV. Two-dimensional depth-resolved Mueller matrix of biological tissue measured with double-beam polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Opt Lett 2002; 27:101–3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Azinfar L, Ravanfar M, Wang YB, Zhang KQ, Duan DS, Yao G. High resolution imaging of the fibrous microstructure in bovine common carotid artery using optical polarization tractography. J Biophotonics 2017; 10:231–41 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhao YH, Chen ZP, Ding ZH, Ren HW, Nelson JS. Real-time phase-resolved functional optical coherence tomography by use of optical Hilbert transformation. Opt Lett 2002; 27:98–100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.He YM, Qu YQ, Jing JC, Chen ZP. Characterization of oviduct ciliary beat frequency using real time phase resolved Doppler spectrally encoded interferometric microscopy. Biomed Opt Express 2019; 10:5650–9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wehbe H, Ruggeri M, Jiao S, Gregori G, Puliafito CA, Zhao W. Automatic retinal blood flow calculation using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Opt Express 2007; 15:15193–206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhi ZW, Yin X, Dziennis S, Wietecha T, Hudkins KL, Alpers CE, Wang R. Optical microangiography of retina and choroid and measurement of total retinal blood flow in mice. Biomed Opt Express 2012; 3:2976–86 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.An L, Wang R. In vivo volumetric imaging of vascular perfusion within human retina and choroids with optical micro-angiography. Opt Express 2008; 16:11438–52 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.An L, Wang RKK. In vivo volumetric imaging of vascular perfusion within human retina and choroids with optical micro-angiography. Optics express 2008;16:11438–52 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Qi WJ, Chen RM, Chou L, Liu GJ, Zhang J, Zhou QF, Chen ZP. Phase-resolved acoustic radiation force optical coherence elastography. J Biomed Opt 2012; 17:110505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Qi WJ, Li R, Ma T, Shung KK, Zhou QF, Chen ZP. Confocal acoustic radiation force optical coherence elastography using a ring ultrasonic transducer. Appl Phys Lett 2014; 104:123702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Drexler W, Sattmarin H, Hermann B, Ko TH, Stur M, Unterhuber A, Scholda C, Findl O, Wirtitsch M, Fujimoto JG, Fercher AF. Enhanced visualization of macular pathology with the use of ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. Archives of ophthalmology 2003;121:695–706 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 31.Schuman JS, Wollstein G, Farra T, Hertzmark E, Aydin A, Fujimoto JG, Paunescu LA. Comparison of optic nerve head measurements obtained by optical coherence tomography and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 135:504–12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ko TH, Fujimoto JG, Schuman JS, Paunescu LA, Kowalevicz AM, Hartl I, Drexler W, Wollstein G, Ishikawa H, Duker JS. Comparison of ultrahigh- and standard-resolution optical coherence tomography for imaging macular pathology. Ophthalmology 2005; 112:1922–35 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jiao SL, Knighton R, Huang XR, Gregori G, Puliafito CA. Simultaneous acquisition of sectional and fundus ophthalmic images with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Opt Express 2005; 13:444–52 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wollstein G, Paunescu LA, Ko TH, Fujimoto JG, Kowalevicz A, Hartl I, Beaton S, Ishikawa H, Mattox C, Singh O, Duker J, Drexler W, Schuman JS. Ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography in glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2005; 112:229–37 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Adhi M, Duker JS. Optical coherence tomography – current and future applications. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2013; 24:213–21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ruggeri M, Webbe H, Jiao SL, Gregori G, Jockovich ME, Hackam A, Duan YL, Puliafito CA. In vivo three-dimensional high-resolution imaging of rodent retina with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48:1808–14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ruggeri M, Tsechpenakis G, Jiao SL, Jockovich ME, Cebulla C, Hernandez E, Murray TG, Puliafito CA. Retinal tumor imaging and volume quantification in mouse model using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Opt Express 2009; 17:4074–83 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.McGovern E, Hosking MCK, Balbacid E, Voss C, Berger F, Schubert S, Harris KC. Optical coherence tomography for the early detection of coronary vascular changes in children and adolescents after cardiac transplantation findings from the international pediatric OCT registry. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2019; 12:2492–501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pasterkamp G, Falk E, Woutman H, Borst C. Techniques characterizing the coronary atherosclerotic plaque: influence on clinical decision making. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36:13–21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tearney GJ, Jang IK, Kang DH, Aretz HT, Houser SL, Brady TJ, Schlendorf K, Shishkov M, Bouma BE. Porcine coronary imaging in vivo by optical coherence tomography. Acta Cardiol 2000; 55:233–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Almog IF, Chen FD, Senova S, Fomenko A, Gondard E, Sacher WD, Lozano AM, Poon JKS. Full-field swept-source optical coherence tomography and neural tissue classification for deep brain imaging. J Biophotonics 2020; 13:e201960083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ather S, Proudlock FA, Welton T, Morgan PS, Sheth V, Gottlob I, Dineen RA. Aberrant visual pathway development in albinism: from retina to cortex. Hum Brain Mapp 2019; 40:777–88 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Choi WJ, Li YD, Wang R. Monitoring acute stroke progression: multi-parametric OCT imaging of cortical perfusion, flow, and tissue scattering in a mouse model of permanent focal ischemia. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2019; 38:1427–37 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Shakhova N, Kuznetzova I, Gladkova N, Snopova L, Gelikonov V, Gelikonov G, Feldchtein F, Kuranov R, Sergeev A. Endoscopic OCT for imaging of uterine body and cervix pathologies. In: Proceedings of the coherence domain optical methods in biomedical science and clinical applications II, vol. 3251, 1998, San Jose, CA: SPIE, pp.59–66 [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kirillin M, Motovilova T, Shakhova N. Optical coherence tomography in gynecology: a narrative review. J Biomed Opt 2017; 22:121709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Welzel J, Lankenau E, Birngruber R, Engelhardt R. Optical coherence tomography of the human skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997; 37:958–63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hoffmann K, Happe M, Pott G, Fricke B, Knuttel A, Bocker D, Stucker M, Altmeyer P, Von During M. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) in dermatology. J Invest Dermatol 1998; 110:583 [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wang YJ, Chang WC, Wang JY, Wu YH. Ex vivo full-field cellular-resolution optical coherence tomography of basal cell carcinomas: a pilot study of quality and feasibility of images and diagnostic accuracy in subtypes. Skin Res Technol 2019. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1111/srt.12801 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Eom JB, Ahn JS, Eom J, Park A. Wide field of view optical coherence tomography for structural and functional diagnoses in dentistry. J Biomed Opt 2018; 23:076008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Golde J, Tetschke F, Walther J, Rosenauer T, Hempel F, Hannig C, Koch E, Kirsten L. Detection of carious lesions utilizing depolarization imaging by polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography. J Biomed Opt 2018; 23: 071203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ghaffari S, Leask RL, Jones E. Simultaneous imaging of blood flow dynamics and vascular remodelling during development. Development 2015; 142:4158–67 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kiseleva E, Kirillin M, Feldchtein F, Vitkin A, Sergeeva E, Zagaynova E, Streltzova O, Shakhov B, Gubarkova E, Gladkova N. Differential diagnosis of human bladder mucosa pathologies in vivo with cross-polarization optical coherence tomography. Biomed Opt Express 2015; 6:1464–76 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tearney GJ, Brezinski ME, Southern JF, Bouma BE, Boppart SA, Fujimoto JG. Optical biopsy in human urologic tissue using optical coherence tomography. J Urology 1997; 157:1915–19 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.D’Amico AV, Weinstein M, Li XD, Richie JP, Fujimoto J. Optical coherence tomography as a method for identifying benign and malignant microscopic structures in the prostate gland. Urology 2000; 55:783–87 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Li Y, Zhu ZK, Chen JJ, Jing JC, Sun CH, Kim S, Chung PS, Chen ZP. Multimodal endoscopy for colorectal cancer detection by optical coherence tomography and near-infrared fluorescence imaging. Biomed Opt Express 2019; 10:2419–29 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Liang KC, Wang Z, Ahsen OO, Lee HC, Potsaid BM, Jayaraman V, Cable A, Mashimo H, Li XD, Fujimoto JG. Cycloid scanning for wide field optical coherence tomography endomicroscopy and angiography in vivo. Optica 2018; 5:36–43 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lee HC, Ahsen OO, Liang KC, Wang Z, Figueiredo M, Giacomelli MG, Potsaid B, Huang Q, Mashimo H, Fujimoto JG. Endoscopic optical coherence tomography angiography microvascular features associated with dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 86:476–84 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Chen SY, Shu X, Nesper PL, Liu WZ, Fawzi AA, Zhang HF. Retinal oximetry in humans using visible-light optical coherence tomography [invited]. Biomed Opt Express 2017; 8:1415–29 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Linsenmeier RA, Zhang HF. Retinal oxygen: from animals to humans. Prog Retin Eye Res 2017; 58:115–51 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Shu X, Beckmann L, Zhang HF. Visible-light optical coherence tomography: a review. J Biomed Opt 2017; 22:121707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Dai C, Liu X, Jiao S. Simultaneous optical coherence tomography and autofluorescence microscopy with a single light source. J Biomed Opt 2012; 17:080502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Jiang M, Liu T, Liu X, Jiao S. Simultaneous optical coherence tomography and lipofuscin autofluorescence imaging of the retina with a single broadband light source at 480 nm. Biomed Opt Express 2014; 5:4242–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Liu T, Wen R, Lam BL, Puliafito CA, Jiao S. Depth-resolved rhodopsin molecular contrast imaging for functional assessment of photoreceptors. Sci Rep 2015; 5:13992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Nafar Z, Wen R, Jiao SL. Visible-light optical coherence tomography-based multimodal system for quantitative fundus autofluorescence imaging. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2018; 243:1265–74 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Nafar Z, Wen R, Jiao SL. Visible light OCT-based quantitative imaging of lipofuscin in the retinal pigment epithelium with standard reference targets. Biomed Opt Express 2018; 9:3768–82 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Thapa D, Wang BQ, Lu YM, Son T, Yao XC. Enhancement of intrinsic optical signal recording with split spectrum optical coherence tomography. J Mod Optic 2017; 64:1800–07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Zhang PF, Zawadzki RJ, Goswami M, Nguyen PT, Yarov-Yarovoy V, Burns ME, Pugh EN. In vivo optophysiology reveals that G-protein activation triggers osmotic swelling and increased light scattering of rod photoreceptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2017; 114:E2937–E46 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Yao G, Duan DS. High-resolution 3D tractography of fibrous tissue based on polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Exp Biol Med 2019; 245:273–81 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Qian XJ, Li RZ, Li Y, Lu GX, He YM, Humayun MS, Chen ZP, Zhou QF. In vivo evaluation of posterior eye elasticity using shaker-based optical coherence elastography. Exp Biol Med 2020; 245:282–88 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Su X, Zheng H, Li Q, Sun P, Zhou M, Li H, Guo J, Chai X, Zhou C. Retinal neurovascular responses to transcorneal electrical stimulation measured with optical coherence tomography. Exp Biol Med 2020; 245:289–300 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Yao X, Alam MN, Le D, Toslak D. Quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography: a review. Exp Biol Med 2020; 245:301–12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Zhang H, Huang S, Chen Y, Xie W, Zhang M, Pan J, Sato N, Wang X, Wu D, Cheng Q. Examining the technical feasibility of prostate cancer molecular imaging by transrectal photoacoustic tomography with transurethral illumination. Exp Biol Med 2020; 245:313–20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Kim J, Park E-Y, Park B, Choi W, Lee KJ, Kim C. Towards clinical photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging: probe improvement and real-time graphical user interface. Exp Biol Med 2020; 245:321–29 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Karthikesh MS, Yang X. Photoacoustic image-guided interventions. Exp Biol Med 2020; 245:330–341 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Dadkhah A, Jiao S. Integrating photoacoustic microscopy, optical coherence tomography, OCT angiography, and fluorescence microscopy for multimodal imaging. Exp Biol Med 2020; 245:342–47 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Li Y, Chen X, Watkins B, Saini N, Gannon S, Nadeau E, Reeves R, Gao B, Pelligrini V, Yao H, Mercuri J, Ye T. Nonlabeling and quantitative assessment of chondrocyte viability in articular cartilage with intrinsic nonlinear optical signatures. Exp Biol Med 2020; 245:348–59 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Lu Y, Kim T-H, Yao X. Comparative study of wild-type and rd10 mice reveals transient intrinsic optical signal response before phosphodiesterase activation in retinal photoreceptors. Exp Biol Med 2020; 245:360–67 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Nesmith HW, Zhang H, Rogers JM. Optical mapping of electromechanics in intact organs. Exp Biol Med 2020; 245:368–73 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Massett M, Bywaters B, Gibbs H, Trzeciakowski J, Padgham S, Chen J, Rivera G, Yeh A, Milewicz D, Trache A. Loss of smooth muscle α-actin effects on mechanosensing and cell-matrix adhesions. Exp Biol Med 2020; 245:374–84 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Experimental Biology and Medicine are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES