Skip to main content
PMC home page
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2017 Feb 14;42(3):203–209. doi: 10.1007/s40858-017-0138-4

Novel Technologies for the detection of Fusarium head blight disease and airborne inoculum

Jonathan S West 1,✉, Gail G M Canning 1, Sarah A Perryman 1, Kevin King 1
PMCID: PMC7370946  PMID: 32714500

Abstract

Many pathogens are dispersed by airborne spores, which can vary in space and time. We can use air sampling integrated with suitable diagnostic methods to give a rapid warning of inoculum presence to improve the timing of control options, such as fungicides. Air sampling can also be used to monitor changes in genetic traits of pathogen populations such as the race structure or frequency of fungicide resistance. Although some image-analysis methods are possible to identify spores, in many cases, species-specific identification can only be achieved by DNA-based methods such as qPCR and LAMP and in some cases by antibody-based methods (lateral flow devices) and biomarker-based methods (‘electronic noses’ and electro-chemical biosensors). Many of these methods also offer the prospect of rapid on-site detection to direct disease control decisions. Thresholds of spore concentrations that correspond to a disease risk depend on the sampler (spore-trap) location (whether just above the crop canopy, on a UAV or drone, or on a tall building) and also need to be considered with weather-based infection models. Where disease control by spore detection is not possible, some diseases can be detected at early stages using optical sensing methods, especially chlorophyll fluorescence. In the case of Fusarium infections on wheat, it is possible to map locations of severe infections, using optical sensing methods, to segregate harvesting of severely affected areas of fields to avoid toxins entering the food chain. This is most useful where variable crop growth or microclimates within fields generate spatially variable infection, i.e. parts of fields that develop disease, while other areas have escaped infection and do not develop any disease.

Keywords: Disease risk, Spore-trap, qPCR, LAMP, Optical sensing

Introduction

In many parts of the world, head blight (ear blight or scab) in small grain cereals is caused by a complex of species in the genus Fusarium, Giberella and Microdochium. It is important to know which head blight pathogens are attacking crops as there may be important differences in host resistance, toxin production or sensitivity to fungicides that will affect control decisions or end-use of the affected crop. Often, the species present in a region and their relative abundance is affected by the local climate, types of crops grown and other agricultural practices, which affect inoculum production and infection success (Del Ponte et al. 2009; O’Donnell et al. 2004; Qiu and Shi 2014). Climate change is also likely to exacerbate the disease by increasing inoculum production and dispersal and also by reducing host resistance (Vaughan et al. 2016). Species of current concern in north-western Europe are deoxynivalenol (DON) toxin producers, F. culmorum and F. graminearum sensu stricto, against which no wheat variety is fully resistant. Wheat grains are only susceptible to infection for a relatively short period during flowering up to the early dough stage (Del Ponte et al. 2007) and infection is encouraged by warm springs and rainfall around anthesis (West et al. 2012). In addition, increased maize cultivation and a trend towards non-inversion or minimal-tillage has increased inoculum availability because the crop residues persist for a long time and produce large amounts of inoculum (Blandino et al. 2010). The timing of airborne inoculum risk and presence of suitable infection conditions can be predicted using within-season weather-based disease forecasting models (De Wolf et al. 2003; Hooker et al. 2002; Moschini et al. 2001). Ideal conditions for infection are 25°C and 100% RH for 24 hr post (Abramson et al. 1987; Parry et al. 1995). However, variation in the response of the pathogen to weather events and differences between microclimates in the crop canopy and soil surface can cause uncertainty in predictions of inoculum availability. For air-dispersed pathogens like F. graminearum, it is possible to use air sampling to produce a direct warning of inoculum presence, which reduces uncertainty of predictions. A range of air sampling methods are reviewed below with various pathogens used as examples. In addition, optical sensing, including remote sensing from satellites, aircraft and drones (UAVs) or ground-based vehicles, is another useful method for detection and mapping of disease symptoms. In the case of head blight, it is not possible to control the disease once symptoms have appeared but symptom detection can help with later decisions on the harvesting and end-use of the grain and is also of use for phenotyping of host material in disease resistance breeding trials. Various methods are reviewed below.

Air sampling for enhanced disease control

Air sampling has been used to study the epidemiology of crop diseases in order to design a control strategy – how to alter time of sowing or harvest to escape disease (Davidson et al. 2013), when precisely to apply fungicides or other crop protection agents (Brachaczek et al. 2016; Cao et al. 2016; Carisse et al. 2009; Thiessen et al. 2016; West et al. 2002), and whether it is possible to separate susceptible crops from inoculum sources (Maldonado-Ramirez et al. 2005; Marcroft et al. 2003). Spore sampling is useful to monitor changes in pathogen populations for both fundamental research and applied purposes such as providing a direct forecast of imminent disease risk by detecting the inoculum before infection events start.

Air particulate samples are typically a deposit of dust, spores, pollen, plant fragments and other microscopic material, either captured by impaction onto a sticky surface, or collected by devices that produce a rapid change of direction of airflow, which causes particles to be deposited onto a surface or into a tube (West and Kimber 2015). Until the early 2000s, samples were routinely identified by microscopy. This lengthy and skilled process is often only possible for identification of relatively large and visually characteristic spores because spores of many species look very similar or even identical and cannot be identified to the species level with high certainty. As a result, a range of diagnostic methods have been applied to air-particulate samples. Many recent advances in spore samplers have been designed to improve the ease of sampling and to enhance the downstream application of diagnostic methods to the sample. In the past 15 years or so, most spore samples have been processed not for microscopy but have DNA extracted from the mixture of particles and then tested by PCR or qPCR to detect a specific target organism e.g. (Carisse et al. 2009; Gent et al. 2009; Kunjeti et al. 2016); (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Stages in the detection of a plant pathogen from airborne samples

For lab-based studies, qPCR is often preferred as this method produces accurate quantification allowing the amount of pathogen DNA detected to be translated into a number of spores present in the air sample and therefore the concentration of spores per cubic metre of air sampled. DNA-based diagnostics can be designed in some cases to detect specific genotypes of a species such as a race that can infect a certain crop variety (Kaczmarek et al. 2014) or a mutant that is resistant to a class of fungicide. Already DNA of the air spora (i.e. spores and other biological particles in the air) has been sequenced but the process is currently relatively expensive, although costs are reducing (personal communication, Mogens Nicolaisen, December 2016, re: article submitted).

Other isothermal DNA-based diagnostics such as LAMP and TwistDX are now being used as they may be more rapid than PCR, use less-expensive equipment or be less prone to inhibition by chemicals present naturally at times in some of the components of the air spora (Hansen et al. 2016; Thiessen et al. 2016). These isothermal DNA amplification methods offer the prospect of samples to be analysed using relatively simple equipment and even in the field. It is possible to use these methods not only for pathogen detection but even quantification of specific pathogen DNA onsite in a matter of minutes. Sophisticated immunological diagnostics and biosensors can also perform this role relatively cheaply and rapidly (Wakeham et al. 2016).

The optimal deployment of air samplers varies according to how widespread or common the pathogen is, the volume of air sampled by the device used and the importance or value of the crop (West and Kimber 2015). Inoculum-based forecasts are best suited to sporadic but damaging diseases of crops and particularly those that infect at early or later crop growth stages (such as Fusarium) when farmers do not routinely spray. In particular, diseases that cause yield-loss in high-value crops such as vegetables or fruits, are also likely to benefit from inoculum-based disease forecasting. It is also not cost-effective to sample for exotic or unusual pathogens that only cause epidemics very rarely (Madden et al. 2007).

Thresholds of spore concentrations to trigger disease control operations are difficult to define and are different for each pathogen. Spore concentrations in air decline with distance from the source and height above the ground. If the exact location of the source is not known, we cannot infer how much dilution has occurred ahead of the sample being taken, i.e. a relatively high concentration of spores in the sample could be caused by a small source of spores very close to the sampler, or by a very large distant source. Some smoothing or buffering against the effects of proximity of the sampler to the source can be achieved by mounting air samplers on the roof of a tall building or on a drone or UAV. The decrease in signal strength due to dilution can be a problem for roof-top sampling but it can also be counter-acted by the air being better mixed, representing the air spora released from a wider range of microclimates present in the environment upwind of the sampling position. Therefore, a single air sampler located at rooftop height can be used to infer the presence of common plant pathogen airborne inoculum over a regional scale. However, for many sporadic pathogens a denser network of samplers is needed to provide the full picture of inoculum distribution. Further research is needed to understand issues of the spatial variability in spore concentrations and how that relates to subsequent disease risk. The prospect of automated samplers that are networked to send near real-time data could then provide a new aspect of precision agriculture – knowing exactly where and when to apply crop protection agents.

Optical sensing for disease management

Diseases can cause a range of different responses in plants from changes in leaf colour, shape or size to disturbances to the plant’s photosynthesis, transpiration, canopy morphology and canopy density (West et al. 2003). This alters the thermal and optical properties of the plant sufficiently for remote sensing to be used to quantify and even map symptoms. With the case of Fusarium head blight and wheat blast, it should be possible to map affected locations of fields to allow segregation of more severely affected parts of fields or entire fields from areas that are relatively unaffected. This can occur due to slight differences in crop growth stage in different parts of fields or nearby entire fields, causing some of the crop to escape disease, while other parts can be severely affected.

Generally, differences in the appearance of healthy and diseased plants can be detected simply by spectroscopy, which measures light quality in the ‘field of view’ of a sensor, by sensing the intensity of wavebands either over the entire spectrum or in just selected specific wavebands. Alternatively, differences in reflectance caused by diseases can be distinguished more powerfully using an imaging system to produce a focussed image that can be analysed pixel by pixel for differences in intensity at specific wavebands (Fig. 2). Different broad wavebands that can be useful for discriminating plant health are summarised in Table 1 (Carter 1993; Moshou et al. 2011; Rouse et al. 1973; West et al. 2003).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Illustration of a camera recording light reflected from a healthy or disease-affected canopy. The quality of light from the healthy canopy has a low ratio of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) to Near InfraRed (NIR), while this ratio is increased in the diseased canopy. Indices such as normal differential vegetation index (NDVI) can be used to improve classification of affected crops. A traditional camera needs to take duplicate images with different filters in front of the lens to allow this processing for classification of disease but modern hyperspectral or multispectral digital cameras can filter light reaching individual pixels of the image sensor surface, allowing images in different wavebands to be taken simultaneously, which can be processed using a computer. Such cameras can be smaller than a tennis ball enabling them to fit onto a drone (UAV). Alternatively, Fig. 2c shows processing of an image of Fusarium affected wheat from a standard digital camera into a simple black and white image, from which clusters of white pixels over a chosen threshold size can indicate an infected location

Table 1.

Comparison of thermal and optical features indicative of healthy and diseased crops

Waveband Diagnostic ability
Visible (400–700 nm) Increased reflectance in diseased canopies, especially in the chlorophyll absorption bands due to loss of chlorophyll and presence of surface spores or mycelium
Near Infra-Red (NIR 700-1200nm) The red edge (rapid transition from low reflectance to high reflectance) is shifted from 730 nm in healthy canopies to shorter wavelengths (e.g. 670 nm) in diseased canopies. Reflectance is also reduced in diseased canopies due to senescence and defoliation.
Short-wave Infra-Red (SWIR 1200–2400 nm) Relatively small effects occur due to water content
Thermal infrared band (TIR ≈ (8000–14000 nm) Leaf temperature is increased by reduced transpiration rate, caused by root diseases and wilts (xylem infection) and some foliar diseases (that cause closure of stomata at early stages). Water-soaked leaf lesions (caused by cell lysis) can appear cooler at the start of the day or warmer at the end of the day as the rest of the leaf changes temperature more quickly according to ambient conditions.
Open in a new tab

To develop a method to measure crop disease, it is important to validate the method on a wide range of symptom severities and under a diverse variety of conditions such as leaf wetness, types of cloud cover and solar angle or ambient light quality. For both spectroscopy and imaging, practical systems can measure just a few discriminatory wavebands, identified by prior research for a particular disease or type of symptom. These can be processed to reduce data storage, e.g. by dividing the intensity of light at one wavelength with that at another wavelength to make an index. A common index is NDVI or Normalised Differential Vegetation Index, which is an indicator of how much green leaf area is present. NDVI is calculated from the intensity of light measured in just two wavebands, near-infrared (NIR; waveband 780–890 nm) and red (R; waveband 650–680 nm) using the equation: (NIR—R) / (NIR + R) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Common Vegetation indices used for plant disease detection

Index Name Formula based on reflectance of given bands or wavelengths (nm) Reference
DVI difference vegetation index NIR - R Tucker and Red (1979)
RVI ratio vegetation index NIR / R Jordan (1969)
NDVI normalized differential vegetation index (NIR-R) / (NIR + R) Rouse et al. (1974)
GNDVI Green normalized difference vegetation index index (NIR - G) / (NIR + G) Gitelson et al. (1996)
NBNDVI Narrow-band normalized difference vegetation index (850–680) / (850 + 680) Thenkabail et al. (2000)
NRI Nitrogen reflectance index (570—670) / (570 + 670) Filella et al. (1995)
TVI Triangular vegetation index 0.5[120(750–550) - 200(670–550)] Broge and Leblanc (2001)
P/PRI Photochemical/Physiological Reflectance Index (531–570) / (531 + 570) Gamon et al. (1992)
TCARI The transformed chlorophyll absorption and reflectance index 3[(700–670) - 0.2(700–550)(700 / 670)] Haboudane et al. (2004)
MCARI Modified chlorophyll absorption ratio index [(701–671)- 0.2(701–549)] / (701/671) Daughtry et al. (2000)
RVSI Red-Edge Vegetation Stress Index [(712+752)/2] - 732 Merton and Huntington (1999)
PSRI Plant Senescence Reflectance Index (680–500)/750 Merzlyak et al. (1999)
ARI Anthocyanin Reflectance Index (550)-1 - (700)-1 Gitelson et al. (2001)
λred Red edge position Wavelength at red edge Gong et al. (2002)
drred Red edge slope Maximum value of 1st derivative with in red edge Gong et al. (2002)
Σdr680–760 nm The area of the red edge peak The area under the derivative curve in the region of red edge Gong et al. (2002)
Open in a new tab

R = Reflectance of red band within wavelengths 650 to 680 nm

NIR = Reflectance of near-infrared band within wavelengths 780 to 890 nm

G = Reflectance of green band within wavelengths 560 to 600 nm.

Using an index avoids measuring every wavelength of the spectrum, which would create a massive dataset. Many other indices can be used - common ones are listed in Table 2, adapted from Cao et al. (Cao et al. 2015).

Spectroscopy and imaging methods can each be used to map diseases and other stresses in fields. Platforms for sensors can include tractors, UAVs, aircraft or satellites. More proximal platforms such as tractors can produce image pixel sizes <1 mm2, while satellite images have pixel sizes of 1–400 m2. Satellite images are therefore best for scouting problems over large areas and usually are not able to identify the cause of the problem. Proximal sensors (e.g. tractor-mounted) are better than remote sensors to differentiate disease symptoms from symptoms of nutrient-stress (West et al. 2003). Artificial supplementary light can improve data collection, particularly if powerful visible or UV light is applied to induce fluorescence of cell walls and chlorophyll, which often can indicate altered photochemical efficiency of a plant before disease symptoms become visible (Cecchi et al. 1994; Scholes 1992; Wright et al. 1995). Fluorescence imaging typically uses cameras fitted with bandwidth filters or multispectral cameras (which have filters over individual pixels of the image sensor surface) to allow fluorescence in different wavebands to be used for diagnosis.

The cost of thermal imaging has been reducing considerably with tiny cameras now available cheaply that can be used with a Raspberry Pi computer. Since changes in the rate of transpiration (caused by early senescence) or disruption of root and xylem function, influence the temperature of leaves and ears in TIR wavebands (8000–14000 nm), it is possible to detect and map fusarium infection using thermal imaging (Oerke and Steiner 2010). In the case of fusarium head blight and wheat blast, this type of detection is only possible when it is too late for disease control options to be applied and is unlikely to allow discrimination of wheat blast and fusarium head blight without complicated pattern recognition methods being used. However, detection of symptoms can allow a more targeted sampling regime to assess which pathogen is present. In addition, where toxigenic Fusarium species are the main pathogen, optical sensing could allow segregation of harvesting severely-affected areas of fields from less-affected areas. It is also possible to use optical sensing to separate healthy and infected harvested grain (Barbedo et al. 2015).

Conclusions

A new type of precision disease management is emerging based on using air sampling with DNA-based diagnostic methods. This can be automated and integrated with wireless communications along with weather data to drive infection models, which together can provide a warning of imminent disease risk. This could be applied to improve control of Fusarium in crops by allowing decisions to be made in time for crop protection products to be effective or to reduce costs of unnecessary applications. Additionally, positions of fields affected by fusarium head blight could also be mapped using reflectance or thermal imaging to allow segregation of harvested grain. Fluorescence can be useful to detect infection at early stages and appears to be a promising method for many diseases. This approach appears not to be appropriate for fusarium control in production field, however, as current fungicides are not effective once infection has become established. Despite this, optical sensing methods can be useful to quantify host-resistance phenotype in pre-breeding and commercial breeding trials. Improved crop protection is increasingly important, particularly for intensive production systems and helps to reduce the environmental impact per unit of produce harvested.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank organisers of the 5th International Symposium on Fusarium Head Blight. Rothamsted Research receives strategic funding from the BBSRC (Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council in the UK). JW, GC and KK receive funding from InnovateUK (projects 102099 and 102104). JW and SP receive funding from InnovateUK (project 101815), JW and GC receive funding from the AHDB (projects RD- 2140021 and RD- 2140020105).

References

  1. Abramson D, Clear RM, Nowicki TW (1987) Fusarium species and trichothecene mycotoxins in suspect samples of 1985 Manitoba wheat. Can J Plant Sci 67(3):611–620
  2. Barbedo JGA, Jayme GA, Tibola CS, Fernandes JMC. Detecting Fusarium head blight in wheat kernels using hyperspectral imaging. Biosyst Eng. 2015;131:65–76. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2015.01.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blandino M, Pilati A, Reyneri A, Scudellari D. Effect of maize crop residue density on fusarium head blight and on deoxynivalenol contamination of common wheat grains. Cereal Res Commun. 2010;38(4):550–559. doi: 10.1556/CRC.38.2010.4.12. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brachaczek A, Kaczmarek J, Jedryczka M. Monitoring blackleg (Leptosphaeria spp.) ascospore release timing and quantity enables optimal fungicide application to improved oilseed rape yield and seed quality. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2016;145(3):643–657. doi: 10.1007/s10658-016-0922-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Broge NH, Leblanc E. Comparing prediction power and stability of broadband and hyperspectral vegetation indices for estimation of green leaf area index and canopy chlorophyll density. Remote Sens Environ. 2001;76(2):156–172. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00197-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cao X, Luo Y, Zhou Y, Fan J, Xu X, West JS, Duan X, Cheng D. Detection of powdery mildew in two winter wheat plant densities and prediction of grain yield using canopy hyperspectral reflectance. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3):e0121462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cao XR, Yao DM, Zhou YL, West JS, Xu XM, Luo Y, Ding KJ, Fan JR, Duan XY. Detection and quantification of airborne inoculum of Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici using quantitative PCR. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2016;146(1):225–229. doi: 10.1007/s10658-016-0908-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Carisse O, Bacon R, Lefebvre A. Grape powdery mildew (Erysiphe necator) risk assessment based on airborne conidium concentration. Crop Prot. 2009;28(12):1036–1044. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2009.06.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Carter GA. Responses of leaf spectral reflectance to plant stress. Am J Bot. 1993;80(3):239–243. doi: 10.2307/2445346. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cecchi G, Mazzinghi P, Pantani L, Valentini R, Tirelli D, Deangelis P. Remote-sensing of chlorophyll-a fluorescence of vegetation canopies 1. near- and far-field measurement techniques. Remote Sens Environ. 1994;47(1):18–28. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(94)90123-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Daughtry CST, Walthall CL, Kim MS, de Colstoun EB, McMurtrey JE. Estimating corn leaf chlorophyll concentration from leaf and canopy reflectance. Remote Sens Environ. 2000;74(2):229–239. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00113-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Davidson JA, Wilmshurst CJ, Scott ES, Salam MU. Relationship between ascochyta blight on field pea (Pisum sativum) and spore release patterns of Didymella pinodes and other causal agents of ascochyta blight. Plant Pathol. 2013;62(6):1258–1270. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. De Wolf ED, Madden LV, Lipps PE (2003) Risk assessment models for wheat fusarium head blight epidemics based on within-season weather data. Phytopathology 93(4):428–435 [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Del Ponte EM, Fernandes JMC, Bergstrom GC. Influence of growth stage on Fusarium head blight and deoxynivalenol production in wheat. J Phytopathol. 2007;155(10):577–581. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2007.01281.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Del Ponte EM, Fernandes JMC, Pavan W, Baethgen WE. A model-based assessment of the impacts of climate variability on Fusarium head blight seasonal risk in southern Brazil. J Phytopathol. 2009;157(11–12):675–681. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2009.01559.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Filella I, Serrano L, Serra J, Penuelas J. Evaluating wheat nitrogen status with canopy reflectance indices and discriminant analysis. Crop Sci. 1995;35(5):1400–1405. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500050023x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gamon JA, Penuelas J, Field CB. A narrow-waveband spectral index that tracks diurnal changes in photosynthetic efficiency. Remote Sens Environ. 1992;41(1):35–44. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(92)90059-S. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gent DH, Nelson ME, Farnsworth JL, Grove GG. PCR detection of Pseudoperonospora humuli in air samples from hop yards. Plant Pathol. 2009;58(6):1081–1091. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2009.02143.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gitelson AA, Kaufman Y, Merzlyak MN. Use of a green channel in remote sensing of global vegetation from EOS-MODIS. Remote Sens Environ. 1996;58(3):289–298. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00072-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gitelson AA, Merzlyak MN, Chivkunova OB. Optical properties and nondestructive estimation of anthocyanin content in plant leaves. Photochem Photobiol. 2001;74(1):38–45. doi: 10.1562/0031-8655(2001)074&#x0003c;0038:OPANEO&#x0003e;2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gong P, Pu R, Heald RC. Analysis of in situ hyperspectral data for nutrient estimation of giant sequoia. Int J Remote Sens. 2002;23(9):1827–1850. doi: 10.1080/01431160110075622. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Haboudane D, Miller JR, Pattery E, Zarco-Tejad PJ, Strachan IB. Hyperspectral vegetation indices and novel algorithms for predicting green LAI of crop canopies: Modeling and validation in the context of precision agriculture. Remote Sens Environ. 2004;90(3):337–352. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2003.12.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hansen ZR, Knaus BJ, Tabima JF, Press CM, Judelson HS, Grünwald NJ, Smart CD. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification for detection of the tomato and potato late blight pathogen, Phytophthora infestans. J Appl Microbiol. 2016;120(4):1010–1020. doi: 10.1111/jam.13079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hooker DC, Schaafsma AW, Tamburic-Ilincic L. Using weather variables pre- and post-heading to predict deoxynivalenol content in winter wheat. Plant Dis. 2002;86(6):611–619. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2002.86.6.611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jordan CF. Derivation of leaf area index from quality of light on the forest floor. Ecology. 1969;50(4):663–666. doi: 10.2307/1936256. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kaczmarek J, Latunde-Dada A-O, Irzykowski W, Cools HJ, Stonard JF, Brachaczek A, Jedryczka M. Molecular screening for avirulence alleles AvrLm1 and AvrLm6 in airborne inoculum of Leptosphaeria maculans and winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus) plants from Poland and the UK. J Appl Genet. 2014;55(4):529–539. doi: 10.1007/s13353-014-0235-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kunjeti SG, Anchieta A, Martin FN, Choi YJ, Thines M, Michelmore RW, Koike ST, Tsuchida C, Mahaffee W, Subbarao KV, Klosterman SJ. Detection and quantification of Bremia lactucae by spore trapping and quantitative PCR. Phytopathology. 2016;106(11):1426–1437. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-03-16-0143-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Madden LV, Hughes G, van den Bosch F (2007) The study of plant disease epidemics. American Phytopathological Society (APS Press) St. Paul, MN, 432p
  29. Maldonado-Ramirez SL, Schmale DG, Shields EJ, Bergstrom GC. The relative abundance of viable spores of Gibberella zeae in the planetary boundary layer suggests the role of long-distance transport in regional epidemics of Fusarium head blight. Agric For Meteorol. 2005;132(1–2):20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.06.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Marcroft SJ, Sprague SJ, Pymer SJ, Salisbury PA, Howlett BJ. Factors affecting production of inoculum of the blackleg fungus (Leptosphaeria maculans) in south-eastern Australia. Aust J Exp Agric. 2003;43(10):1231–1236. doi: 10.1071/EA02117. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Merton R, Huntington J (1999) Early simulation of the ARIES-1 satellite sensor for multi-temporal vegetation research derived from AVIRIS. In: Summaries of the Eight JPL Airborne Earth Science Workshop. Pasadena, USA, 23-25 Feb 1999, Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech.; Pasadena, USA, pp. 299–307
  32. Merzlyak MN, Gitelson AA, Chivkunova OB, Rakitin VY. Non-destructive optical detection of pigment changes during leaf senescence and fruit ripening. Physiologic Plantarum. 1999;106(1):135–141. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.1999.106119.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Moschini RC, Pioli R, Carmona M, Sacchi O. Empirical predictions of wheat head blight in the Northern Argentinean Pampas region. Crop Sci. 2001;41(5):1541–1545. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2001.4151541x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Moshou D, Bravo C, Oberti R, West JS, Ramon H, Vougioukas S, Bochtis D. Intelligent multi-sensor system for the detection and treatment of fungal diseases in arable crops. Biosyst Eng. 2011;108(4):311–321. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2011.01.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. O’Donnell K, Ward TJ, Geiser DM, Kistler HC, Aoki T. Genealogical concordance between mating type locus and seven other nuclear genes supports formal recognition of nine phylogenetically distinct species within the Fusarium graminearum clade. Fungal Genet Biol. 2004;41(6):600–623. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2004.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Oerke E-C, Steiner U. Potential of digital thermography for disease control. In: Oerke E-C, Gerhards R, Menz G, Sikora RA, editors. Precision crop protection – the challenge and use of heterogeneity, 1. Dordrecht: Springer Science; 2010. pp. 167–182. [Google Scholar]
  37. Parry DW, Jenkinson P, McLeod L. Fusarium ear blight (scab) in small-grain cereals - a review. Plant Pathol. 1995;44(2):207–238. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.1995.tb02773.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Qiu J, Shi J. Genetic relationships, carbendazim sensitivity and mycotoxin production of the Fusarium graminearum populations from maize, wheat and rice in eastern China. Toxins. 2014;6(8):2291–2309. doi: 10.3390/toxins6082291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Rouse JW, Haas RH, Schell JA, Deering DW (1974) Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. In: Freden, S.C.; Mercanti, E.P.; Becker, M. Third Earth Resources Technology Satellite Symposium, Washington, D.C., USA, 10-14 Dec 1973, Volume I: Technical Presentations, NASA SP-351, NASA, Washington, D.C., pp. 309-317
  40. Scholes JD (1992) Photosynthesis: cellular and tissue aspects in diseased leaves. In: Ayres, P.G. Pests and pathogens: plant responses to foliar attack. 1, Oxford, Bios Scientific Publishers, 1992, Chapter 7, 85–106
  41. Thenkabail PS, Smith RB, De Pauw E. Hyperspectral vegetation indices and their relationships with agricultural crop characteristics. Remote Sens Environ. 2000;71(2):158–182. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(99)00067-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Thiessen LD, Keune JA, Neill TM, Turechek WW, Grove GG, Mahaffee WF. Development of a grower-conducted inoculum detection assay for management of grape powdery mildew. Plant Pathol. 2016;65(2):238–249. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12421. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Tucker CJ. Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sens Environ. 1979;8(2):127–150. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(79)90013-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Vaughan M, Backhouse D, Del Ponte EM (2016) Climate change impacts on the ecology of Fusarium graminearum species complex and susceptibility of wheat to Fusarium head blight: a review. World Mycotoxin J 9(5):685–700
  45. Wakeham AJ, Keane G, Kennedy R. Field evaluation of a competitive lateral-flow assay for detection of Alternaria brassicae in vegetable Brassica crops. Plant Dis. 2016;100(9):1831–1839. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-10-15-1211-RE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. West JS, Kimber RBE. Innovations in air sampling to detect plant pathogens. Ann Appl Biol. 2015;166(1):4–17. doi: 10.1111/aab.12191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. West JS, Fitt BDL, Leech PK, Biddulph JE, Huang Y-J, Balesdent M-H. Effects of timing of Leptosphaeria maculans ascospore release and fungicide regime on phoma leaf spot and phoma stem canker development on winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus) in southern England. Plant Pathol. 2002;51(4):454–463. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3059.2002.00726.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. West JS, Bravo C, Oberti R, Lemaire D, Moshou D, McCartney HA. The potential of optical canopy measurement for targeted control of field crop diseases. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2003;41:593–614. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.121702.103726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. West JS, Holdgate S, Townsend JA, Edwards SG, Jennings P, Fitt BDL (2012) Impacts of changing climate and agronomic factors on Fusarium ear blight of wheat in the UK. Fungal Ecol 5(1):53–61
  50. Wright DP, Baldwin BC, Shepard MC, Scholes JD. Source-sink relationship in wheat leaves infected with powdery mildew. 1. alterations in carbohydrate metabolism. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 1995;47(4):237–253. doi: 10.1006/pmpp.1995.1055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tropical Plant Pathology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES