Abstract
Coronin 1C is overexpressed in multiple tumors, leading to the widely held view that this gene drives tumor progression, but this hypothesis has not been rigorously tested in melanoma. Here, we combined a conditional knockout of Coronin 1C with a genetically engineered mouse model of PTEN/BRAF-driven melanoma. Loss of Coronin 1C in this model increases both primary tumor growth rates and distant metastases. Coronin 1C-null cells isolated from this model are more invasive in vitro and produce more metastatic lesions in orthotopic transplants than Coronin 1C-reexpressing cells due to the shedding of extracellular vesicles (EVs) containing MT1-MMP. Interestingly, these vesicles contain melanosome markers suggesting a melanoma-specific mechanism of EV release, regulated by Coronin 1C, that contributes to the high rates of metastasis in melanoma.
Subject terms: Membrane trafficking, Cancer
Introduction
Melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer with a high propensity for metastatic spread1,2. The most common genetic drivers of melanoma are BRAF-activating mutations such as V600E, often found in conjunction with loss of tumor suppressors such as PTEN3–5. If caught in its early stages, melanoma is treatable by surgical resection, but prognosis worsens significantly with the occurrence of in-transit, regional, or distant metastasis. Clinically, up to 54% of metastatic melanoma patients show tumor dissemination to the brain, 77% to the liver, and 85% to the lung6. The high rate of metastasis in melanoma is poorly understood, but may be linked to lineage-specific factors that impact vesicular trafficking, secretion, degradation, and overall cell migration7,8.
The extracellular matrix (ECM) is an important substrate for tumor cell migration, but it also acts as a physical barrier whose degradation by matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) is thought to be a critical step in tumor dissemination9–11. MMPs are a family of both transmembrane (designated “membrane-type” or “MT”) and secreted catalytic enzymes capable of cleaving ECM proteins and other substrates. Membrane-type 1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) is a particularly important pro-invasive MMP across many cancer types 12 and whose expression closely correlates with invasion and metastasis13–15. MT1-MMP is also unique in its ability to both directly cleave a wide range of ECM proteins including collagen types I, II, and III, laminin 1 and 5, and fibronectin, as well as activate pro-MMP216.
The trafficking of MT1-MMP to and from the plasma membrane (PM) and other membrane structures is surprisingly complex, but critical for the protein’s function during tumor invasion and metastasis. Phosphorylation of the cytoplasmic tail initiates internalization of MT1-MMP from the PM by both clathrin-mediated and caveolin-mediated routes13. Internalized vesicles traffic through the endolysosomal pathway, resulting in redirection to other areas of the PM or to the lysosome for degradation17. MT1-MMP recycling has been shown to involve various flotilins18 and SNARE proteins19–22, as well as a variety of Rab proteins including Rab5, Rab718,22, Rab823,24, and Rab27a25. Interestingly, MT1-MMP can also localize to secreted extracellular vesicles (EVs) and these EVs are capable of degrading matrix at sites distant from the cell19,26. The mechanism of MT1-MMP trafficking to EVs is not well understood, nor is the significance of this phenomenon for metastasis clear.
Coronins are highly conserved F-actin binding proteins that regulate actin dynamics through multiple mechanisms including ADF/cofilin-mediated turnover and Arp2/3 complex-mediated branching27,28. Coronin 1C is a member of the Type 1 coronin family that has been implicated in lamellipodial protrusion, cell migration and, most recently, vesicular trafficking29. In pancreatic β-cells, Coronin 1C regulates endocytosis of insulin granule membranes and subsequent retrograde transport30. Coronin 1C also plays a role in endosome fission to membrane contact sites on the endoplasmic reticulum31, and directly binds to the melanosome- and endosome-sorting protein Rab27a in pancreatic β-cells32. Unlike other coronin genes, Coronin 1C expression is highly dynamic and is regulated through transcriptional control, as well as through miRNAs33–35. Coronin 1C is upregulated in several cancers36–40, and its depletion by RNAi has been shown to inhibit proliferation, migration, and transwell invasion in lung-squamous cell carcinoma34 and triple-negative breast cancer cells35. However, its role in cancer progression has not been rigorously tested in animal models of metastatic cancer and has not been functionally tested in melanoma at all.
Animal models of cancer are important tools for studying tumor cell behavior in physiological contexts, and genetically engineered mouse (GEM) models allow for the study of tumor progression in the presence of an intact immune system. However, GEM models have been difficult to use to study metastasis due to lack of control over the site and timing of tumor initiation. Recently, we modified an existing GEM model of melanoma by adding a Cre-inducible TdTomato fluorescent reporter allele41. Using this model, we developed a precise tumor initiation protocol using localized trans-dermal application of 4-hydroxytamoxifen to activate CreER expressed only in endogenous melanocytes. The TdTomato allele in this model allows primary tumors to be tracked by intravital imaging and disseminated cells to be detected by fluorescence-based methods such as flow cytometry. By combining this model and tumor initiation protocol with a conditional knockout allele, we evaluated the role of Coronin 1C in melanoma progression and metastasis.
Results
Pten/Braf melanoma tumors lacking Coronin 1C grow faster and metastasize more frequently
To test the role of Coronin 1C in melanoma growth and metastasis, we modified an existing GEM model by breeding in a Coronin 1C conditional knockout allele (Fig. 1a). The PBT model utilizes Cre/Lox recombination to delete the tumor suppressor gene Pten and constitutively activate the oncogene Braf in melanocytes42. The addition of a LoxP/stop/LoxP (LSL) TdTomato allele43 enables the tracking of induced tumor cells via fluorescent microscopy41 (Fig. 1b). The expanded model (designated PBT-1C) utilizes a previously validated conditional knockout allele of the Coro1C gene44, allowing us to directly compare tumor growth and metastases with and without Coronin 1C.
Primary tumors were induced on the ears of mice using a previously developed topical tamoxifen application protocol to activate CreER expressed in the mouse’s endogenous melanocytes using the Tyrosinase promoter. Primary PBT-1C tumors (lacking Coronin 1C) grew to a palpable mass four to five weeks after induction with tamoxifen, while it took approximately six to eight weeks for a palpable mass to form in the PBT animals (Fig. 1c). Over the course of 13 weeks, primary tumors lacking Coronin 1C grew deeper into the tissue significantly faster than their PBT counterparts (Fig. 1d). Multiphoton imaging of the TdTomato + tumor cells and the bundled collagen fibers (visualized via second harmonic imaging) within the ear revealed that the tumor cells increased in number faster when they lacked Coronin 1C, and that the collagen fibers degraded more quickly than the PBT control tumors (Fig. 1e, f). In addition, immunohistochemical staining of the primary tumors revealed stronger CD31 staining around blood vessels in PBT-1C primary tumors (Suppl. Fig. 1) suggesting increased angiogenesis45–47. Although there was a trend of larger blood vessels measured in PBT-1C tumors at 10 weeks post-induction compared to the control PBT counterparts, this change was not significant.
To measure metastasis, five organs relevant to clinical melanoma metastasis were then checked for the presence of TdTomato + surface metastases by imaging with a dissection microscope (Fig. 2a, b). To our surprise, we observed that the Coronin 1C-null tumors in the PBT-1C mice had more large, distant metastases (macro-metastases) than the control tumors in the PBT model (Fig. 2C). While PBT mice displayed no visible metastases to the brain or the liver, PBT-1C mice displayed macro-metastases in 18% and 9%, respectively. 7% of PBT mice and 5% of PBT-1C mice had macro-metastases in the lung.
Given the fact that the primary tumors grew faster in the PBT-1C mice, we suspected that metastastic tumors in distant organs in this model would also grow faster and would produce the observed trends in macro-metastases, even without differences in the rates of metastatic seeding. In order to address this question, we exploited the presence of TdTomato fluorescence in the model to develop a protocol using flow cytometry to identify micro-metastases that were either too small to see on the dissecting microscope or buried within the tissues (Fig. 2a). We postulated that the presence of micro-metastases would reflect events of metastatic seeding without the confounding factor of tumor growth. Although both the PBT and PBT-1C models showed micro-metastases, they were more prevalent in PBT-1C mice than PBT in every organ sampled with the exception of the pancreas (Fig. 2d), suggesting that in addition to primary tumor cell proliferation, metastatic seeding was also enhanced by the deletion of Coronin 1C. The most pronounced differences in the rate of micro-metastases were in the brain and liver, where 37.5% and 50% of PBT-1C mice developed micro-metastases, respectively, compared to 8.3% and 16.6% in the PBT mice. Together, these data show that deletion of Coronin 1C from the tumor cells in this model leads to significantly accelerated primary tumor growth and a trend toward enhanced metastasis.
Coronin 1C-null cells display a higher propensity for invasion
To better understand the increased trend towards metastasis observed upon loss of Coronin 1C, we isolated a Coronin 1C-null cell line (referred to as Null throughout) from a macroscopic brain lesion in a PBT-1C mouse. The cells were then stably rescued with Coronin1C-GFP and single cell clones were isolated and expanded (Fig. 3a, Suppl. Fig. 2). The clone termed Rescue, showed Coronin 1C expression levels similar to those seen in a melanoma cell line derived previously from the Pten/Braf model48 containing endogenous Coronin 1C (PBT2460). Another clone termed OE (overexpression) had expression of Coronin 1C > 2 × higher than the endogenous level (Fig. 3b).
We first characterized proliferation rates of these 3 cell lines and found that Null cells proliferated more slowly than their Coronin 1C-expressing counterparts in 2D culture (Suppl. Fig. 2). While this observation is in line with Coronin 1C knockdown in other cancer types34,35,49, it also indicates that proliferation in vitro does not always accurately predict proliferation in the 3D tumor microenvironment. To compare cell motility rates, we used single cell tracking and found that OE cells, moved significantly faster than the Rescue and Null lines on FN-coated glass (Fig. 3c). While this is consistent with previous 2D work involving Coronin 1C in other tumor cell lines34,35,50, it also suggests that this assay is a poor predictor of in vivo metastasis. To better mimic the endogenous environment of the tumor, multicellular spheroids were generated from each of the three cell lines and embedded into a 3D collagen matrix. Invasion of the cells into the surrounding gel was observed over 15 h (Fig. 3d, Suppl. Vid. 1–3). Null cells migrated significantly faster than Rescues, and OEs moved the slowest (Fig. 3e), suggesting that this form of motility more faithfully represents with the metastasis phenotype observed in vivo.
To ensure that our in vitro results accurately reflect the in vivo phenotypes observed in the original GEM mice, spheroids generated from these cells were injected into the ears of nude mice51. This is a critical experiment that controls for any differences in GEM strain backgrounds that may have contributed to changes in metastatic potential. Upon primary tumor ulceration, organs were subjected to the same metastasis identification protocol that was used on the GEM mice (Fig. 2a). Tumors arising from Null cell spheroid injection resulted in brain and liver micro-metastases in 80% and 60% of cases, respectively, whereas the occurrence of micro-metastases fell to 25% for these organs in OE cells, with the Rescue cells displaying in an intermediate phenotype. This demonstrated a Coronin 1C-dependent decrease in metastasis (Fig. 3f) that confirms our in vivo metastasis observations in the GEM models. Minimal change in lung micro-metastases was observed between the three injected cell lines, and there were no macro-metastases observed in any of the nude mice injected with any of the cell spheroids, possibly due to faster primary tumor growth rates in this immunodeficient background that resulted in faster ulceration and therefore less time for the distant tumors to grow. These data, in conjunction with GEM model metastases and 3D cell invasion, demonstrate that the loss of Coronin 1C enhances the invasive capacity and metastasis of melanoma tumor cells to the brain and liver. It was unexpected to see such low numbers of micro-metastases to the lung considering such increase in the brain and the liver. These data, along with minimal change in lung metastases in the GEM model upon Coro1C deletion, suggests that Coronin 1C expression impacts the ability for the dissemination of metastases to the brain and liver, but not to the lung.
Coronin 1C-null cells exhibit increased matrix degradation
Since Coronin 1C has a role in suppressing migration/invasion in 3D collagen gels but not in 2D, we hypothesized that the cells lacking Coronin 1C may be able to degrade the matrix more efficiently, a crucial component of 3D migration22,52. To test this hypothesis, we plated cells on 2D FITC-labeled collagen matrix for 24 h to identify sites of degradation by the absence of fluorescent signal. All three cell lines formed invadopodia as defined by spots of degradation under the cells where a subset colocalized with spots of filamentous actin (F-actin)53. While we saw no significant change in the fraction of cells containing invadopodia with or without Coronin 1C (Fig. 4b), the Nulls contained roughly twice as many spots of degradation under the cell body as the Coronin 1C-rescued lines (Fig. 4c).
Although Coronin 1C-null cells had more invadopodia under the cell body than the Rescue and OE cells, the most striking difference was the number of degradation spots distant from the cells (Fig. 4A, D). There were over three times more spots of degradation outside of the cell border in the Null cells compared to the Rescue and OE cells (Fig. 4d). One possible explanation for this result would be that Coronin 1C-null cells visit more areas of the gel during the experiment through migration, degrading the matrix via invadopodia as they moved along. However, the velocity at which the Null cells moved over the gelatin invadopodia substrate was not significantly altered compared to the two rescue lines (Fig. 4e).
We therefore postulated that not all of these degradation events observed outside of the cell boundary of the Null cells originated from PM-localized invadopodia, but rather from a diffusible factor secreted into the extracellular space. To test this hypothesis, we harvested conditioned media from each cell line and ran a zymography assay to visualize changes in secreted degradative proteins (Fig. 5a). We identified a band of gelatin degradation at ~ 60 kD that was nearly ten times stronger in the Null cell conditioned media compared to the Rescues and OEs (Fig. 5b), demonstrating that the loss of Coronin 1C results in an increase in the secretion of degradative factors.
Extracellular vesicles containing MT1-MMP, Trp1 and Rab27a are responsible for extracellular matrix degradation
We sought to identify the protein in the conditioned media responsible for the 60 kD band of degradation. MT1-MMP was a strong candidate due to its molecular weight, relevance in cancer invasion, and its unique signature in melanoma54–57. Western blot analysis revealed higher MT1-MMP expression in the conditioned media from Nulls relative to Rescues and OEs (Fig. 5c), while MT1-MMP in the cellular lysates were unchanged (Fig. 5d). To confirm that MT1-MMP localized to distant sites of degradation, we used immunofluorescent staining and observed co-localization of MT1-MMP with degraded spots both under the cells and at distant sites (Fig. 5e). These MT1-MMP-positive sites of extracellular degradation also colocalized with extracellular vesicle (EV) markers CD63 (Fig. 5e), HSC70 (Suppl. Fig. 3), and β1 integrin (Suppl. Fig. 3). MT1-MMP (Fig. 5f) and each EV marker (Fig. 5g, Suppl. Fig. 3) was also detectible in western blots of pelleted EVs following differential ultracentrifugation of the conditioned media in the Null cells while these proteins were either decreased or undetectable in the Rescues and OEs. Interestingly, we also detected increased MMP2 secretion in the Null cells (Sup Fig. 3F) and saw localization to sites of degradation, though on the western blot the molecular weight of ~ 75 KD ran higher than where we saw degradation on the zymography gel, and is indicative of inactive, pro-MMP2 (Suppl. Fig. 3).
Since whole-cell MT1-MMP levels were not affected by Coronin 1C expression (Fig. 5d) but were increased on EVs being secreted by Coronin 1C null cells, we tested if MT1-MMP present on the PM was affected by Coronin 1C expression. To address this question, fixed cells were labeled for MT1-MMP presented on the PM using a fluorescent conjugated primary antibody. Integrated fluorescent density was measured for individual cells to determine the quantity of MT1-MMP present on the surface. Interestingly, we found that PM-localized MT1-MMP increases as the levels of Coronin 1C expression rises (Fig. 5h), consistent with altered trafficking of MT1-MMP with and without Coronin 1C. These results suggest that MT1-MMP secreted on EVs, as opposed to the surface-presented MT1-MMP, is driving the degradation at distant sites and subsequent invasion of these cells.
Based on the evidence of altered secretion in the Coronin 1C-null cells, we sought to identify ultrastructural abnormalities indicative of changes in the secretion pathway. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were taken of each of the three cell lines. The Nulls exhibited many multicompartmental EVs docked at the cell surface for secretion (Fig. 6a) and some separated from any surrounding cells (Suppl. Fig. 4), suggesting these structures were being released into the media. By contrast, Rescues and OEs displayed fewer EVs docked to the cell surface, and there was a noticeable increase in the amount of membrane-bound bodies built up around the PM (Fig. 6b, c, Suppl. Fig. 4). Some of these bodies bore resemblance to the EVs at the cell surface, denoted by red arrows, and others showed signs of abnormal multivesicular body development, denoted by purple arrows. An additional subset of these bodies, highlighted by blue arrows, bore a strong resemblance to granular melanosomes58. In cases where we captured EVs being secreted from OE cells, they were presented at the end of fingerlike projections (Fig. 6d, Suppl. Fig. 4) which strongly resemble a proposed mechanism of melanosome transfer where multiple melanosomes are presented at the tips of dendritic fingers for transfer to neighboring keratinocyte59–61.
These observations show differences in vesicular trafficking and EV secretion depending on Coronin 1C expression. We were especially intrigued by the observation of melanosome-like structures accumulating near the membrane in the Rescue and OE cells. Immunostaining with late-stage melanosome marker Trp1 revealed pockets of strong signal near the PM which colocalized with both MT1-MMP and Coronin 1C in the Rescue and OE cells (Fig. 6e). These pockets of increased PM signal were absent in Null cells, but Trp1- and MT1-MMP-postive spots on the glass surface near the cells were observed. On FITC-labeled gelatin, Trp1 co-localized with sites of degradation along with MT1-MMP in each of the three cell lines (Fig. 6f).
To further confirm that this phenomenon is tied to the melanosome secretion pathway, we tested the role of Rab27a, a protein critical for the trafficking and docking of melanosomes62,63, in MT1-MMP secretion. We found that upon Rab27a inhibition with the drug Nexinhib20 which inhibits the interaction with Rab27a and Slp1/JFC164, extracellular degradation was drastically reduced (Suppl. Fig. 5). Interestingly, Rab27a also localizes to spots of extracellular degradation and was detected in the EVs pelleted from Null cell CM via western blotting. These data are consistent with the notion that MT1-MMP secretion is at least partially utilizing the melanosome secretion pathway, and that this process is affected by the presence or absence of Coronin 1C. This melanosome secretion pathway is lineage-specific, and thus unique to melanoma compared to other cancer types. This observation may explain the unexpected increase in metastasis upon the loss of Coronin 1C in this tumor type.
MT1-MMP is crucial for melanoma cell invasion
To functionally confirm that MT1-MMP was responsible for surrounding matrix degradation, we depleted MT1-MMP using two distinct shRNAs. The resulting knockdown (Suppl. Fig. 6) correlated with decreased degradation in the zymography assay of Null cell conditioned media (Fig. 7a). Upon plating the MT1-MMP-depleted cells on 2D gelatin, we observed a significant reduction in distant spots of degradation in Rescue and OE cells (Fig. 7b). Strikingly, we observed > 10 fold reduction in the number of degradation spots distant from the cells in the Nulls with MT1-MMP depletion, and these cells also showed a decrease in the percentage of cells containing degradation spots (Fig. 7c) as well as a slight decrease in the total number of degradation spots under each cell (Fig. 7d). Interestingly, MT1-MMP depletion led to only modest changes in the number of invadopodia of Rescues and OE cells suggesting that a baseline level of MT1-MMP-independent invadopodia function exists in these cells that must rely on other MMPs.
Upon MT1-MMP depletion we also observed a decreased capacity for Null spheroids to invade in 3D collagen (Fig. 7e, Suppl. Vids. 4–5). The velocities of the Nulls with MT1-MMP depletion was reduced to near the levels of the OEs (Fig. 7f). MT1-MMP depletion in Rescue cells showed slight but significant decrease in 3D cell velocity and no significant difference was observed in the MT1-MMP-depleted OE cells. Together, these results show that MT1-MMP secretion is critical for melanoma cells to degrade ECM and efficiently invade the surrounding matrix. Moreover, these data show that the increased invasion observed in Coronin 1C-null melanoma cells is almost entirely dependent on MT1-MMP.
Discussion
In this study, we functionally tested the role of Coronin 1C in primary tumor growth and metastasis using a Braf/Pten Cre-inducible GEM model for melanoma41. Surprisingly, we found that primary tumor growth was accelerated without Coronin 1C (Fig. 1) and that both macroscopic and microscopic metastatic events were more frequent (Fig. 2, 3f). Cells isolated from these Coronin 1C-null tumors displayed a greater propensity for invasion in 3D collagen matrices compared to cells re-expressing Coronin 1C, consistent with our in vivo results (Fig. 3, Suppl. Vids. 1–3). The Coronin 1C-null cells showed a striking increase in secretion of MT1-MMP compared to rescue lines (Fig. 5), which is crucial for ECM degradation at sites distant from the cells in 2D and for 3D invasion (Fig. 7). From these observations, we conclude that the loss of Coronin 1C in melanoma leads to increased release of MT1-MMP-containing extracellular vesicles, resulting in an increased propensity for local tumor cell invasion and, more importantly, for the establishment of distant metastases. Because the MT1-MMP-containing EVs colocalize with both exosome markers as well as melanosome marker Trp1 (Figs. 5, 6, Suppl. Fig.s 3, 5), we hypothesize that secretion of these EVs reflects an aberrant, Coronin 1C-regulated melanosome secretion pathway, and that this mechanism is likely responsible for the unique role of Coronin 1C in melanoma invasion.
MT1-MMP’s role in invasion is well documented and is one of the most important MMPs for cancer progression12–15. The degradative protease activity of MT1-MMP is typically thought to function at the PM, with a strong enrichment at invadopodia structures4,65. These finger-like protrusions are crucial for tumor cell invasion in vitro and are believed to help tumor cells breach the basement membrane and other ECM barriers during several stages of metastasis in vivo4,66–68. In addition to the pericellular function of MT1-MMP at the PM, several studies have also reported that it is secreted into the extracellular space on EVs. MT1-MMP can be secreted both on exosomes24,26 as well as on microvesicles19 in melanoma cells. In both cases, MT1-MMP maintains the correct typology to degrade substrates in the extracellular space. However, the mechanism by which MT1-MMP is secreted on EVs and how this process is regulated remains poorly understood.
In our studies, we found extracellular spots of matrix degradation that colocalized with MT1-MMP and contained exosome markers CD63, HSC70 and β1 integrin (Fig. 5). While these observations suggest that these MT1-MMP-containing EVs are being released as exosomes through an MVB-mediated secretion pathway69–72, in actuality the story is more complicated as these structures also contain the melanosome markers Trp1 (Fig. 6f) and Rab27a (Suppl. Fig. 5). These data, along with the presence of aberrant MVBs and multivesicular EVs in our Rescue and OE cells (Fig. 6a–d, Suppl. Fig. 4), suggest that secretion of MT1-MMP-containing EVs are regulated by some kind of functional crosstalk between the MVB and melanosome trafficking machinery.
Melanoma is a uniquely aggressive cancer that has a high propensity for invasion and establishment of distant metastases. This behavior is thought to reflect the developmental history of melanoblasts/melanocytes. Consistent with this idea, melanoma cells display early-development gene signatures during tumor progression8,73–75 and studies illustrate how melanoma cells revert back to gene expression signatures of precursor Neural Crest Cells (NCCs) that give them growth and migratory advantages to promote tumor development8,76. Interestingly, MT1-MMP is highly expressed in NCCs77 and has recently been identified as a necessary contributor to NCC migration78 and these elevated levels of MT1-MMP are inappropriately re-expressed in melanoma during disease progression12.
Vesicular and membrane trafficking are also uniquely regulated in melanocytes and have been observed to be differentially modulated in melanoma cells compared to other cancers7,79. One of the core functions of melanocytes relies on a unique vesicular trafficking processes: the production, trafficking, and secretion of melanosomes, aiding in skin pigmentation and protection against damaging solar radiation. Our data demonstrating that the melanosome markers Trp1 and Rab27a colocalizes with MT1-MMP-containing EVs and subsequent matrix degradation suggests that these cells appear to be utilizing this melanocyte-specific pathway to promote invasion and metastasis, and that this process is regulated by Coronin 1C. In normal melanocytes, melanosomes mature as they are trafficked from the nucleus through the cytoplasm to the cell periphery along microtubules with the aid of Rab27a and associated motor protein myosin Va80. Once melanosomes reach the cell periphery, our understanding of the mechanism of their secretion and transfer becomes less clear.
Proposed mechanisms for melanosome transport include both vesicle fusion events as well as direct PM budding80–82. One well supported mechanism involves secretion through exocytosis of the melanin core through fusion of the melanosome with the PM83–85 which is consistent with both our staining data and our TEM images of intracellular and extracellular vesicles (Fig. 6, Suppl. Fig. 4). Another interesting proposal is that melanosomes are transferred to neighboring keratinocytes through the projection of filopodia-like structures with bundles of melanosomes presented at the tip for transfer to neighboring cells59–61, which shows a striking resemblance to the TEM images acquired of our OE cell line (Fig. 6d, Suppl. Fig. 4). Given the evidence that cancers can rewire lineage-specific signatures to create a growth or metastasis advantage, these trafficking pathways may be vital in understanding how Coronin 1C influences MT1-MMP secretion in our model, and why the role for Coronin 1C in melanoma seems so different from other cancer types.
Based on these expression data showing Coronin 1C overexpression/upregulation in many aggressive cancers36–39,86, we expected that deletion of Coronin 1C would yield a less aggressive tumor with fewer metastases. However, we found that tumors lacking Coronin 1C grew faster and were much more metastatic. Although our data are seemingly at odds with these over-expression observations, we would point out that correlation does not automatically mean causation and hypotheses derived from expression data must be tested with functional experiments. Indeed, some experiments using either RNAi depletion or over-expression in cell lines show that Coronin 1C is a positive regulator of proliferation and invasion in breast cancer and lung-squamous cell carcinoma34,35,87. Additionally, Coronin 1C was shown to enhance MT1-MMP trafficking to the cell surface in an orthotopic injection model of breast cancer87, which is again seemingly at odds with our results. However, recent data using genetic deletion of Coronin 1C in a GEM model of glioblastoma showed no change in time of survival with or without Coronin 1C88, further supporting the idea that Coronin 1C impacts tumor progression differently between cancer types. We postulate that the unique metastatic nature of melanoma and the underlying biology of melanocytes may help explain the context-dependent nature of Coronin 1C function in disease progression and metastasis.
Based on our data, the loss of Coronin 1C results in increased secretion of MT1-MMP-containing extracellular vesicles. Although Coronins are best known to regulate actin dynamics in lamellipodia, there is a growing body of literature supporting their function in membrane and vesicle trafficking. In HeLa cells, Coronin 1C was identified as a crucial regulator of endosomal fission from the endoplasmic31 and has been reported to bind directly to GDP-Rab27a to regulate endocytosis32 and insulin exocytosis89 in secretory pancreatic β-cells. In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells, Coronin 1B, a coronin with significant homology to Coronin 1C, has been shown to regulate exosome secretion via destabilization of the actin network at MVB docking sites through interactions with cortactin and Rab27a71. It is possible that Coronin 1C’s influence on the actin cytoskeleton at the PM contributes to the increased exosome secretion in our cells either through interactions with Rab27a, cortactin, and/or F-actin itself. Coronin 1C has even been shown to bind to MT1-MMP directly in glioblastoma cells88, but the function of this interaction has not been defined. Future studies will be directed at dissecting the precise mechanisms involved in this process.
Materials and methods
Reagents and materials
Antibodies for Western blotting, immunofluorescence, and IHC were purchased from Abcam (MMP14 [MT1-MMP, [EP1264Y] and CD31 [ab28364]), Takara Bio (GFP [JL8]), Thermo Fisher (GAPDH [6C5] and MMP2 [PA5-85197]), and Santa Cruz (HSC70 [B6], CD63 [MX-49.129.5], TRP1 [TA99], Rab27a [E12A-1], Trp1 [TA99], MT1-MMP [C9, AF647], and integrin β1 [A-4]). The Coronin 1C antibody was purified as described in Chan et al. 2012. 4-Hydroxytamoxifen, Nexinhib20, and 60 well Nunc MicroWell MiniTrays were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. 28 mL Nalgene Oak Ridge High-Speed PPCO Centrifuge Tubes, and 20 mm Nalgene Sealing Caps for Oak Ridge Centrifuge Tubes were purchased from Thermo Fisher. 10 KDa Amicon Ultra-15 Centrifugal Filter Units were purchased from EMD Millipore. Untreated µ-Slide 8 Well dishes were purchased from Ibidi. 35 mm Dish, No. 1.5 Coverslip, 20 mm Glass Diameter, Uncoated dishes were purchased from MatTek. A 10 µL Microsyringe model 701 and 27GA needle attachments were purchased from Hamilton.
Genetically engineered mouse models
The PBT model used was described previously41. Briefly, CreER is expressed under the melanocyte-specific promotor Tyrosinase and its activity is regulated spatially and temporally by addition of 4-Hydroxytamoxifen (4-HT). Endogenous PTEN is flanked by LoxP sites on both alleles, and a WT Braf cDNA is flanked by LoxP sites and followed by the V600E mutant form expressed from the endogenous promoter upon deletion of the WT cDNA. A Lox/stop/Lox site precedes a TdTomato gene, which upon activation with Cre is deleted allowing for TdTomato expression. The PTB-1C model was derived from the PBT model with homozygous floxed Coro1C alleles bred in44. Breeding, care, and maintenance of each strain were carried out in accordance to UNC’s Division of Laboratory Animal Medicine- and Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee-approved protocols and standards. Genotyping for correct PTEN, BRAF, TdTomato, Cre, and Coro1C is completed from DNA isolated from toe clips of pups before use in experimentation.
Tumor induction and measurement in GEM models
Tumors were induced in PBT and PBT-1C mice by local application of 4-HT to the left ear of 7–8-week-old PBT and PBT-1C mice of both sexes as described previously41. Briefly, 1 µL of 20 mM 4-HT solution in DMSO, 100% ethanol, and orange-6 dye was applied under anesthesia for precisely nine minutes before the area was thoroughly washed with 70% ethanol. Tumor growth was quantified by measuring the thickness of the ear where the tumor was induced every seven days by caliper while the mice were anesthetized with 1.5% isoflurane.
Cell lines
All cells were cultured in DMEM with 10% FBS at 37 °C and 5% CO2. A Coronin 1C-null cell line (referred to all Null throughout the paper) was isolated from a brain metastasis from a male PBT-1C mouse induced with 4-HT by surgical resection of the tumor, dissociation in 0.25% trypsin/EDTA, and selected by FACS for TdTomato expression. Western blot analysis confirmed that the cell line was null for Coronin 1C as well as Pten. Mouse Coronin 1C fused to GFP on its C-terminus in the lentiviral vector pLL5.090 was packaged into viral particles using HEK293FT cells. Null cells were incubated with this virus for 36 h. Infected cells were selected by FACS sorting for GFP expression and expanded. Single GFP-positive cells were sorted into a 96-well plate for clonal expansion by the UNC Flow Cytometry Core Facility. Clonal populations were screened for Coronin 1C expression levels using Western blotting. One clonal population was identified as having endogenous Coronin 1C expression compared to line PBT2460 isolated from the PBT model42 and we designated this line Rescue. Another clonal population showed ~ 2 × higher Coronin 1C expression and was called OE. TdTomato-negative cell lines were generated by targeting TdTomato using the Zhang Lab lentiviral CRISPR toolbox protocol and lentiCRISPR v2 construct91,92. Cells infected with the construct were selected using 10 µM puromycin, and the cells were then sorted for lack of TdTomato expression using FACS.
Macro-metastasis identification
Mice were sacrificed when the primary tumor began to ulcerate via CO2 euthanasia and cervical dislocation according to UNC’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines. Organs were harvested, placed in sterile PBS and imaged with an Olympus MVX10 macroscope system. TdTomato + macro-metastases were identified using fluorescence and appropriate filter sets in conjunction with Metamorph software.
Micro-metastasis identification
Organs that had been scanned for macro-metastases were prepped for micro-metastasis identification protocol adapted from a previous method93, then transferred to 6 cm dishes and minced with a razor blade in 0.5 mL of sterile PBS. The dish was then rinsed with 1 mL of PBS and all the contents transferred to a 15 mL conical tube. These were spun at 1,000 rpm for three minutes and the supernatant was removed. The pellets were then resuspended in 0.25–1 mL of 300 U/mL collagenase and 100 U/mL hyaluronidase in DMEM, incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with vortex mixing at 30 min. The mixtures were again pelleted and the supernatant was removed, followed by wash with 1 mL PBS. At this point, brain tissue was set aside because it did not require further dissociation. The remaining organ mixtures were resuspended in 0.25% trypsin/EDTA and incubated for 21 min at 37 °C with a vortex mix every 7 min, before being spun down and rinsed with 1 mL PBS. All dissociated organs were resuspended in 0.5 mL ice cold PBS and fixed with 4.5 mL ice cold 4% PFA for 15 min. Cells were then spun down and rinsed with 1 mL of PBS for 5 min and stored at 4 °C for no longer than 48 h before analysis. Cells were prepped for sorting according to protocol outlined previously94 and profiled with a Bio-Rad S3 Cell Sorter. TdTomato + threshold was set by the profile of TdTomato-expressing Coronin 1C-defincient Null cell line as outlined below. Uninduced PBT and PBT-1C mice (not treated with 4-HT) were used as a negative control by profiling each organ for endogenous TdTomato expression. For each organ type, the mean number of cells that fell inside of the TdTomato + threshold plus the 95% confidence intervals were calculated so that each organ had its own unique threshold based on endogenous autofluorescence of the tissue. Any induced mouse organ TdTomato profile that fell above the control 95% confidence interval was considered a positive hit for a micro-metastasis.
Immunohistochemistry
Tumors were harvested from the base of the ear, fixed in 4% PFA for 24 h at 4 °C and preserved in 30% sucrose at 4 °C. Fixed tumors were washed for 24 h in PBS and paraffin embedded for sectioning. Sections underwent heat-induced epitope retrieval and were chromogen stained for CD31 with Vector Red and counterstained with hematoxylin. Sectioning and staining were preformed by the Histology Research Core Facility in the Department of Cell Biology and Physiology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Depletion of MT1-MMP by shRNA
shRNAs against mouse MT1-MMP were acquired from the UNC-CH Lenti-shRNA Core Facility in pLKO.1 vectors. Lentiviruses expressing these shRNAs were generated using standard packaging methods in HEK293FT cells as described previously95 and were used to infect Null, Rescue, and OE cells for 36 h. Infected cells were selected by 10 µM puromycin and knockdown was assessed by western blotting. All experiments were completed with three passages following puromycin selection. The targeting sequences for MT1-MMP were: (sh1) CCATCAATACTGCCTACGAAA; (sh2) GCAGTGATGAAGTCTTCACAT.
Zymography
80% confluent 6 cm dishes were rinsed with PBS and covered with 4 mL of serum-free DMEM. After 24 h, 3.5 mL of this conditioned media was removed and concentrated to 250 µL using Amicon Ultra-15 Centrifugal Filters. Conditioned media volumes were normalized according to cell count from the dishes of origin and incubated with 2 × SDS loading buffer without 2-mercaptoethanol for 20 min at 37 °C before being loaded into a 10% SDS gel containing 0.1% porcine gelatin. Gels were run at 200 V packed on ice until the 37kd marker ran off of the gel, then washed four times for 30 min each at room temperature with wash buffer (25 mM Tris pH 7.6, 5 mM CaCl2, 3 mM NaN3, 0.25 nM ZnCl2, and 1.25% Triton-X100 in water). The gel was then washed with ddH2O for 30 min before incubation for 36 h at 37°C in incubation buffer composed of 25 mM Tris pH 7.6, 5 mM CaCl2, 3 mM NaN3 and 0.375 M NaCl in water. The gel was then quickly rinsed in distilled water before staining with 0.1% Coomassie Blue solution for 1 h. After destaining for about 30 min, the gel was imaged using a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc MP Imaging System. Band intensity was quantified using Image Lab 6.0.1 software and graphed in GraphPad Prism.
Western blotting and immunostaining
Western blotting was performed as described previously96. Conditioned media loading was controlled by normalizing the volume to the number of cells counted from the dish which the media was removed. Band intensity was quantified using Image Lab 6.0.1 software and graphed in GraphPad Prism. Immunostaining of cells on either 2D gelatin matrix or fibronectin-coated glass was done following a previously published protocol97.
Cell spheroid generation: hanging droplet method
Cells in culture were suspended at 100,000 cells/mL. 24 µL of suspension was added to each well of a Nunc MicroWell MiniTray and inverted. Dishes were placed inside of a 15 cm culture dish humidified with 8 mL of PBS inside an open 6 cm dish. Spheroids were left to coalesce for 4 days at 37 °C 5% CO2 before use.
Nude mouse spheroid injection
Cell spheroids plus 1–1.5 µL of sterile PBS were injected into the left ear of nude mice anesthetized with 1.5% isoflurane using a Hamilton Microliter Syringe with a 27GA needle29. Primary tumor growth was monitored weekly and imaged on an Olympus MVX10 macroscope system. Mice were sacrificed via CO2 euthanasia and cervical dislocation according to UNC’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines when the primary tumor began to ulcerate and were processed by the macro- and micro-metastasis identification protocol.
Microscopy
Fixed-cell and live-cell images of 3D spheroid invasion, 2D matrix degradation, and cells plated on glass coverslips were captured with a Zeiss LSM800 microscope with a 10 ×, 40 ×, or 63 × objective using both confocal and airyscan settings. Movies and images were processed on both Zen Blue and Fiji software. IHC slides were imaged using an Olympus BX51 microscope with a 40 × objective using Metamorph software. TEM was performed by the University of North Carolina’s Microscopy Services Laboratory.
2D collagen matrix degradation
Acid-washed coverslips were coated with a 2D FITC-conjugated collagen matrix previously described94. Equal numbers of each cell type were plated onto the gel-coated coverslips in 12 well dishes for 24 h before fixation and staining. Degradation spots were counted manually. Calculations of matrix area devoid of cells was determined by using a custom MATLAB script to identify cell area and subtracting that value from the total area of the image. Briefly, the code uses the image processing toolbox to threshold the cell boundary from fluorescent cell images and calculates the area within that boundary in order to determine the area of matrix in uninhabited by a cell body. The code used in this study and a sample data set is openly available on GitHub along with auxiliary scripts accessible for download at https://github.com/maxhocken/SuperfineBear.
3D matrix invasion
Gel matrix composed of 1 mg/mL rat tail collagen, 1 × DPBS, and 3.3 mM NaOH dissolved in sterile water. 100 µL of gel mix was used to coat the bottom of each glass-bottomed chamber slide well and solidified at 37 °C for 1 h. One spheroid was suspended in 100 µL of gel mix and pipetted on top of the primary gel layer and solidified for 1 h at 37 °C and then overlaid with 100 µL of DMEM to avoid drying out. Chamber slides were then imaged every 10–20 min for 16 h with a Zeiss LSM800 confocal microscope in 51 Z planes across 200 µm. Maximum intensity projection movies were generated with Zen Blue software and invading cells were tracked using the manual tracking tool on Fiji. Velocities were calculated using the chemotaxis plugin on Fiji. Temperature, humidity, and CO2 levels were maintained by a Tokai Hit chamber regulator.
Surface MT1-MMP quantification
Cells were plated on FN-coated glass coverslips and fixed with 4% PFA. After three 10-min washes with PBS, cells were blocked for 30 min in 10% BSA and 10% NGS in PBS. Without permeabilizing the cells, surface MT1-MMP was labeled via incubation with AlexaFluor647-conjugated MT1-MMP primary antibody for 1 h in 1% BSA in PBS. The cells were rinsed three times for 10 min with PBS, then mounted onto slides for imaging using a Hamamatsu Orca-flash 4.0LT camera on a Zeiss800 microscope and 40 × objective. MT1-MMP surface expression was quantified by calculating the integrated pixel density of individual cells across 3 biological replicates, as previously described98. Briefly, images were imported into Fiji and the TdTomato signal from the cells was used to carefully trace an outline for each cell. Integrated pixel density of the AlexaFluor647 signal was measured and calculated for each individual cell using Fiji’s measurement tool.
Ultracentrifugation
Three 10-cm dishes of 80% confluent cells were rinsed with PBS before incubation with 10 mL each of serum-free DMEM for 48 h. CM was collected and cell debris was spun out at 5,000 g for 15 min and discarded. 25 mL of supernatant was transferred to ultracentrifuge tubes and spun at 10,000 g for 30 min. Supernatant was transferred to clean ultracentrifuge tubes and spun at 100,000 g for 2 h. The pellets from the 10,000 g and 100,000 g spins were resuspended in 400 µL of PBS containing protease inhibitor cocktail and run out in western blots for protein detection.
2D migration assay
Equal numbers of cells were either plated on 2D collagen matrix or glass-bottomed Mat-Tek dishes coated with 10 µg/mL fibronectin for 1 h and rinsed with PBS. Cells were given 4 h to adhere before imaging every 10 min with a VivaView microscope for 16 h. Movies were generated with Metamorph software and individual cells were tracked in Fiji using the manual tracking tool. Velocities were calculated using the Fiji Chemotaxis plugin.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank Robert Currin in the Hooker Imaging Core for assistance with intravital imaging, Ashley Ezzel in the Histology Research Core Facility in the Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, and members of the Bear lab for scientific feedback and discussion. We gratefully acknowledge support from a National Institutes of Health grant to J.E.B. (R35GM130312). C.V.P. was supported in part by the UCRF Innovator Award and the Susan G. Komen Career Catalyst Award.
Author contributions
A.C.T. and J.E.B. conceived experiments while A.C.T., S.C.H., and P.S.H. conducted experiments. M.A.H. wrote and ran code. J.E.B. secured funding and supervised. A.C.T. and J.E.B. wrote and edited the manuscript. C.V.P. and H.E.B. provided technological and methodological assistance.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-67465-w.
References
- 1.Domingues B, Lopes JM, Soares P, Pópulo H. Melanoma treatment in review. Immunotargets Ther. 2018;7:35–49. doi: 10.2147/ITT.S134842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Leonardi GC, et al. Cutaneous melanoma: From pathogenesis to therapy (review) Int. J. Oncol. 2018;52:1071–1080. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2018.4287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rabbie R, Ferguson P, Molina-Aguilar C, Adams DJ, Robles-Espinoza CD. Melanoma subtypes: Genomic profiles, prognostic molecular markers and therapeutic possibilities. J. Pathol. 2019;247:539–551. doi: 10.1002/path.5213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Reddy BY, Miller DM, Tsao H. Somatic driver mutations in melanoma. Cancer. 2017;123:2104–2117. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tsao H, Goel V, Wu H, Yang G, Haluska FG. Genetic interaction between NRAS and BRAF mutations and PTEN/MMAC1 inactivation in melanoma. J. Invest. Dermatol. (London) 2004;122:337–341. doi: 10.1046/j.0022-202X.2004.22243.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Damsky WE, Rosenbaum LE, Bosenberg M. Decoding melanoma metastasis. Cancers (Basel) 2010;3:126–163. doi: 10.3390/cancers3010126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Alonso-Curbelo D, et al. RAB7 controls melanoma progression by exploiting a lineage-specific wiring of the endolysosomal pathway. Cancer Cell. 2014;26:61–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.04.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gupta PB, et al. The melanocyte differentiation program predisposes to metastasis after neoplastic transformation. Nat. Genet. 2005;37:1047–1054. doi: 10.1038/ng1634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Knapinska AM, Fields GB. The expanding role of MT1-MMP in cancer progression. Pharmaceuticals. 2019;12:77. doi: 10.3390/ph12020077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sakamoto T, Seiki M. Integrated functions of membrane-type 1 matrix metalloproteinase in regulating cancer malignancy: Beyond a proteinase. Cancer Sci. 2017;108:1095–1100. doi: 10.1111/cas.13231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wolf K, et al. Physical limits of cell migration: Control by ECM space and nuclear deformation and tuning by proteolysis and traction force. J. Cell Biol. 2013;201:1069–1084. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201210152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Thakur V, Bedogni B. The membrane tethered matrix metalloproteinase MT1-MMP at the forefront of melanoma cell invasion and metastasis. Pharmacol. Res. 2016;111:17–22. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2016.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Remacle A, Murphy G, Roghi C. Membrane type I-matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) is internalised by two different pathways and is recycled to the cell surface. J. Cell Sci. 2003;116:3905–3916. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sabeh F, et al. Tumor cell traffic through the extracellular matrix is controlled by the membrane-anchored collagenase MT1-MMP. J. Cell Biol. 2004;167:769–781. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200408028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Takino T, et al. Membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase regulates collagen-dependent mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal-related kinase activation and cell migration. Cancer Res. 2004;64:1044–1049. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-1843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Itoh Y. MT1-MMP: A key regulator of cell migration in tissue. IUBMB Life. 2006;58:589–596. doi: 10.1080/15216540600962818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Uekita T, Itoh Y, Yana I, Ohno H, Seiki M. Cytoplasmic tail–dependent internalization of membrane-type 1 matrix metalloproteinase is important for its invasion-promoting activity. J. Cell Biol. 2001;155:1345–1356. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200108112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Planchon D, et al. MT1-MMP targeting to endolysosomes is mediated by upregulation of flotillins. J. Cell Sci. 2018;131:jcs218925. doi: 10.1242/jcs.218925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Clancy JW, et al. Regulated delivery of molecular cargo to invasive tumour-derived microvesicles. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:6919. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kean MJ, et al. VAMP3, syntaxin-13 and SNAP23 are involved in secretion of matrix metalloproteinases, degradation of the extracellular matrix and cell invasion. J. Cell Sci. 2009;122:4089–4098. doi: 10.1242/jcs.052761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Steffen A, et al. MT1-MMP-dependent invasion is regulated by TI-VAMP/VAMP7. Curr. Biol. 2008;18:926–931. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.05.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Williams KC, Coppolino MG. Phosphorylation of membrane type 1-matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) and its vesicle-associated membrane protein 7 (VAMP7)-dependent trafficking facilitate cell invasion and migration. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:43405–43416. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.297069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hendrix A, Westbroek W, Bracke M, De Wever O. An ex(o)citing machinery for invasive tumor growth. Can. Res. 2010;70:9533–9537. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Muralidharan-Chari V, et al. ARF6-regulated shedding of tumor cell-derived plasma membrane microvesicles. Curr. Biol. 2009;19:1875–1885. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.09.059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hoshino D, et al. Exosome secretion is enhanced by invadopodia and drives invasive behavior. Cell Rep. 2013;5:1159–1168. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.10.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hakulinen J, Sankkila L, Sugiyama N, Lehti K, Keski-Oja J. Secretion of active membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase (MMP-14) into extracellular space in microvesicular exosomes. J. Cell. Biochem. 2008;105:1211–1218. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chan KT, Creed SJ, Bear JE. Unraveling the enigma: progress towards understanding the coronin family of actin regulators. Trends Cell Biol. 2011;21:481–488. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2011.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gandhi, M. & Goode, B. L. In The Coronin Family of Proteins: Subcellular Biochemistry (eds. Clemen, C. S., Eichinger, L. & Rybakin, V.) 72–87 (Springer, New York, 2008). 10.1007/978-0-387-09595-0_7. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 29.Chan KT, Roadcap DW, Holoweckyj N, Bear JE. Coronin 1C harbours a second actin-binding site that confers co-operative binding to F-actin. Biochem. J. 2012;444:89–96. doi: 10.1042/BJ20120209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kimura T, Niki I. Rab27a in pancreatic beta-cells, a busy protein in membrane trafficking. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2011;107:219–223. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2011.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hoyer MJ, et al. A novel class of ER membrane proteins regulates ER-associated endosome fission. Cell. 2018;175:254–265.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kimura T, et al. The GDP-dependent Rab27a effector coronin 3 controls endocytosis of secretory membrane in insulin-secreting cell lines. J. Cell Sci. 2008;121:3092–3098. doi: 10.1242/jcs.030544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lim JP, et al. YBX1 gene silencing inhibits migratory and invasive potential via CORO1C in breast cancer in vitro. BMC Cancer. 2017;17:201. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3187-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mataki H, et al. Downregulation of the microRNA-1/133a cluster enhances cancer cell migration and invasion in lung-squamous cell carcinoma via regulation of Coronin 1C. J. Hum. Genet. 2015;60:53–61. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2014.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wang J, et al. miR-206 inhibits cell migration through direct targeting of the actin-binding protein Coronin 1C in triple-negative breast cancer. Mol. Oncol. 2014;8:1690–1702. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Luan S-L, et al. Primary effusion lymphoma: genomic profiling revealed amplification of SELPLG and CORO1C encoding for proteins important for cell migration. J. Pathol. 2010;222:166–179. doi: 10.1002/path.2752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ren G, et al. Coronin 3 promotes gastric cancer metastasis via the up-regulation of MMP-9 and cathepsin K. Mol. Cancer. 2012;11:67. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-11-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Roadcap, D. W., Clemen, C. S. & Bear, J. E. In The Coronin Family of Proteins: Subcellular Biochemistry (eds. Clemen, C. S., Eichinger, L. & Rybakin, V.) 124–135 (Springer, New York, 2008). 10.1007/978-0-387-09595-0_12. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 39.Thal DR, et al. Expression of coronin-3 (coronin-1C) in diffuse gliomas is related to malignancy. J. Pathol. 2008;214:415–424. doi: 10.1002/path.2308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wu L, et al. Coronin-1C is a novel biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma invasive progression identified by proteomics analysis and clinical validation. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010;29:17. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-29-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Brighton HE, et al. New mechanisms of resistance to MEK inhibitors in melanoma revealed by intravital imaging. Cancer Res. 2018;78:542–557. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-1653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Dankort D, et al. BrafV600E cooperates with Pten loss to induce metastatic melanoma. Nat. Genet. 2009;41:544. doi: 10.1038/ng.356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Madisen L, et al. A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat. Neurosci. 2010;13:133–140. doi: 10.1038/nn.2467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Behrens J, et al. Coronin 1C-free primary mouse fibroblasts exhibit robust rearrangements in the orientation of actin filaments, microtubules and intermediate filaments. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2016;95:239–251. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2016.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.DeLisser HM, et al. Involvement of endothelial PECAM-1/CD31 in angiogenesis. Am J Pathol. 1997;151:671–677. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kim H, et al. CD31+ cells represent highly angiogenic and vasculogenic cells in bone marrow: novel role of non-endothelial CD31+ cells in neovascularization and their therapeutic effects on ischemic vascular disease. Circ Res. 2010;107:602–614. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.218396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Schlüter A, et al. CD31 and VEGF are prognostic biomarkers in early-stage, but not in late-stage, laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:272. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4180-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hanna SC, et al. HIF1α and HIF2α independently activate SRC to promote melanoma metastases. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:2078–2093. doi: 10.1172/JCI66715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Guo W, et al. Exosomes: New players in cancer (review) Oncol. Rep. 2017;38:665–675. doi: 10.3892/or.2017.5714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Samarin SN, Koch S, Ivanov AI, Parkos CA, Nusrat A. Coronin 1C negatively regulates cell-matrix adhesion and motility of intestinal epithelial cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010;391:394–400. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.11.069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Chan KT, et al. Intravital imaging of a spheroid-based orthotopic model of melanoma in the mouse ear skin. IntraVital. 2013;2:e25805. doi: 10.4161/intv.25805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wolf K, Friedl P. Extracellular matrix determinants of proteolytic and non-proteolytic cell migration. Trends Cell Biol. 2011;21:736–744. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2011.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kelly T, Mueller SC, Yeh Y, Chen WT. Invadopodia promote proteolysis of a wide variety of extracellular matrix proteins. J. Cell. Physiol. 1994;158:299–308. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041580212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Jacomasso T, Trombetta-Lima M, Sogayar MC, Winnischofer SMB. Downregulation of reversion-inducing cysteine-rich protein with Kazal motifs in malignant melanoma: inverse correlation with membrane-type 1-matrix metalloproteinase and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2. Melanoma Res. 2014;24:32–39. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ma J, et al. Noncanonical activation of Notch1 protein by membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) controls melanoma cell proliferation. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289:8442–8449. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.516039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Pekkonen, P. et al. Lymphatic endothelium stimulates melanoma metastasis and invasion via MMP14-dependent Notch3 and β1-integrin activation. Elife7 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 57.Shaverdashvili K, et al. MT1-MMP modulates melanoma cell dissemination and metastasis through activation of MMP2 and RAC1. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2014;27:287–296. doi: 10.1111/pcmr.12201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hunter JA, et al. Cellular fine structure in the invasive nodules of different histogenetic types of malignant melanoma. Br. J. Dermatol. 1978;98:255–272. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1978.tb06152.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Okazaki K, Uzuka M, Morikawa F, Toda K, Seiji M. Transfer mechanism of melanosomes in epidermal cell culture. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1976;67:541–547. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12664554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Ruprecht KW. Pigmentation of the down feather in Gallus domesticus L. Light and electron microscopic studies of melanosome transfer. Z. Zellforsch. Mikrosk. Anat. 1971;112:396–413. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Yamamoto O, Bhawan J. Three modes of melanosome transfers in Caucasian facial skin: Hypothesis based on an ultrastructural study. Pigment Cell Res. 1994;7:158–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0749.1994.tb00044.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Booth AEG, Seabra MC, Hume AN. Rab27a and melanosomes: A model to investigate the membrane targeting of Rabs. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2012;40:1383–1388. doi: 10.1042/BST20120200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Ohbayashi N, Fukuda M. Role of Rab family GTPases and their effectors in melanosomal logistics. J. Biochem. 2012;151:343–351. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvs009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Johnson JL, et al. Identification of neutrophil exocytosis inhibitors (Nexinhibs), small molecule inhibitors of neutrophil exocytosis and inflammation: Druggability of the small GTPase Rab27a. J. Biol. Chem. 2016;291:25965–25982. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.741884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Murphy DA, Courtneidge SA. The ‘ins’ and ‘outs’ of podosomes and invadopodia: characteristics, formation and function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011;12:413–426. doi: 10.1038/nrm3141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Chiang SPH, Cabrera RM, Segall JE. Tumor cell intravasation. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2016;311:C1–C14. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00238.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Condeelis J, Segall JE. Intravital imaging of cell movement in tumours. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2003;3:921–930. doi: 10.1038/nrc1231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Tokui N, et al. Extravasation during bladder cancer metastasis requires cortactin-mediated invadopodia formation. Mol. Med. Rep. 2014;9:1142–1146. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2014.1965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Bobrie, A., Colombo, M., Krumeich, S., Raposo, G. & Théry, C. Diverse subpopulations of vesicles secreted by different intracellular mechanisms are present in exosome preparations obtained by differential ultracentrifugation. J. Extracell. Vesicles1 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 70.Carroll-Portillo, A., Surviladze, Z., Cambi, A., Lidke, D. S. & Wilson, B. S. Mast cell synapses and exosomes: Membrane contacts for information exchange. Front. Immunol.3 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 71.Sinha S, et al. Cortactin promotes exosome secretion by controlling branched actin dynamics. J Cell Biol. 2016;214:197–213. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201601025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Théry C, Zitvogel L, Amigorena S. Exosomes: Composition, biogenesis and function. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2002;2:569–579. doi: 10.1038/nri855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Garraway LA, Lander ES. Lessons from the cancer genome. Cell. 2013;153:17–37. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Garraway LA, Sellers WR. From integrated genomics to tumor lineage dependency. Cancer Res. 2006;66:2506–2508. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Hendrix MJC, et al. Reprogramming metastatic tumour cells with embryonic microenvironments. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2007;7:246–255. doi: 10.1038/nrc2108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Bronner-Fraser M. Neural crest cell migration in the developing embryo. Trends Cell Biol. 1993;3:392–397. doi: 10.1016/0962-8924(93)90089-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Harrison M, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase genes in Xenopus development. Dev. Dyn. 2004;231:214–220. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.20113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Garmon T, Wittling M, Nie S. MMP14 regulates cranial neural crest epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and migration. Dev. Dyn. 2018;247:1083–1092. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.24661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Cheli Y, Ohanna M, Ballotti R, Bertolotto C. Fifteen-year quest for microphthalmia-associated transcription factor target genes. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2010;23:27–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-148X.2009.00653.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Tadokoro R, Takahashi Y. Intercellular transfer of organelles during body pigmentation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2017;45:132–138. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2017.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Bossche KVD, Naeyaert J-M, Lambert J. The quest for the mechanism of melanin transfer. Traffic. 2006;7:769–778. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2006.00425.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Wu, X. & Hammer, J. A. Melanosome transfer: It is best to give and receive. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1–7 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 83.Ando H, et al. Melanosomes are transferred from melanocytes to keratinocytes through the processes of packaging, release, uptake, and dispersion. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2012;132:1222–1229. doi: 10.1038/jid.2011.413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Tarafder AK, et al. Rab11b mediates melanin transfer between donor melanocytes and acceptor keratinocytes via coupled exo/endocytosis. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2014;134:1056–1066. doi: 10.1038/jid.2013.432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Virador VM, et al. Influence of α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone and ultraviolet radiation on the transfer of melanosomes to keratinocytes. FASEB J. 2001;16:105–107. doi: 10.1096/fj.01-0518fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Sun Y, et al. Coronin3 regulates gastric cancer invasion and metastasis by interacting with Arp2. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2014;15:1163–1173. doi: 10.4161/cbt.29501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Castagnino A, et al. Coronin 1C promotes triple-negative breast cancer invasiveness through regulation of MT1-MMP traffic and invadopodia function. Oncogene. 2018;37:6425–6441. doi: 10.1038/s41388-018-0422-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Solga, R. et al. CRN2 binds to TIMP4 and MMP14 and promotes perivascular invasion of glioblastoma cells. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 151046 (2019). 10.1016/j.ejcb.2019.151046. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 89.Yi Z, et al. The Rab27a/granuphilin complex regulates the exocytosis of insulin-containing dense-core granules. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002;22:1858–1867. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.6.1858-1867.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Vitriol EA, Uetrecht AC, Shen F, Jacobson K, Bear JE. Enhanced EGFP-chromophore-assisted laser inactivation using deficient cells rescued with functional EGFP-fusion proteins. PNAS. 2007;104:6702–6707. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701801104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Sanjana NE, Shalem O, Zhang F. Improved vectors and genome-wide libraries for CRISPR screening. Nat. Methods. 2014;11:783–784. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Shalem O, et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells. Science. 2014;343:84–87. doi: 10.1126/science.1247005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Leslie PL, et al. Histone deacetylase 11 inhibition promotes breast cancer metastasis from lymph nodes. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12222-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Graham DM, et al. Enucleated cells reveal differential roles of the nucleus in cell migration, polarity, and mechanotransduction. J. Cell Biol. 2018;217:895–914. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201706097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Cai L, Makhov AM, Schafer DA, Bear JE. Coronin 1B antagonizes cortactin and remodels Arp2/3-containing actin branches in lamellipodia. Cell. 2008;134:828–842. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Haynes EM, et al. GMFβ controls branched actin content and lamellipodial retraction in fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 2015;209:803–812. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201501094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Zimmerman SP, Asokan SB, Kuhlman B, Bear JE. Cells lay their own tracks—Optogenetic Cdc42 activation stimulates fibronectin deposition supporting directed migration. J. Cell Sci. 2017;130:2971–2983. doi: 10.1242/jcs.205948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Rotty JD, et al. Profilin-1 serves as a gatekeeper for actin assembly by Arp2/3-dependent and -independent pathways. Dev. Cell. 2015;32:54–67. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.10.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.