Abstract
Over the past decade, topology has emerged as a major branch in broad areas of physics, from atomic lattices to condensed matter. In particular, topology has received significant attention in photonics because light waves can serve as a platform to investigate nontrivial bulk and edge physics with the aid of carefully engineered photonic crystals and metamaterials. Simultaneously, photonics provides enriched physics that arises from spin-1 vectorial electromagnetic fields. Here, we review recent progress in the growing field of topological photonics in three parts. The first part is dedicated to the basics of topological band theory and introduces various two-dimensional topological phases. The second part reviews three-dimensional topological phases and numerous approaches to achieve them in photonics. Last, we present recently emerging fields in topological photonics that have not yet been reviewed. This part includes topological degeneracies in nonzero dimensions, unidirectional Maxwellian spin waves, higher-order photonic topological phases, and stacking of photonic crystals to attain layer pseudospin. In addition to the various approaches for realizing photonic topological phases, we also discuss the interaction between light and topological matter and the efforts towards practical applications of topological photonics.
Subject terms: Metamaterials, Nanophotonics and plasmonics, Photonic devices, Sub-wavelength optics
Topological photonics: Light and topology linked in theory and practice
The structural property of materials known as their topology can be exploited to control the behavior of light in the emerging field of topological photonics, offering potential applications in areas including topology theory, optical communication and optical computing. Researchers in South Korea and the USA, led by Junsuk Rho at Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH) in South Korea, review recent progress in this rapidly developing field. They consider detailed theoretical and practical aspects of the interaction of light with materials whose topology influences the behavior of light waves. These materials include ‘photonic crystals’ and ‘metamaterials’, which have structural features on scales shorter than the wavelength of light. The authors also discuss progress towards developing practical applications for topological photonics. The ability to achieve highly efficient light transmission without dissipation is particularly promising.
Introduction
Topology is a field of mathematics that studies conserved and quantized quantities, which are known as topological invariants. Two objects that have the same topological invariants are defined as topologically equivalent. For instance, imagine a sphere that transforms via two intermediates to a torus in time (Fig. 1a–d). Whereas the geometrical parameters continuously change in time, a topological parameter, or a topological invariant, is discretized as an integer. We consider the number of holes on a surface as a topological invariant; it is zero for objects A to C and unity for object D. Deformations from A to B and from B to C preserve the topological invariant and are called continuous because the parameters continuously change during the deformation. Therefore, objects A, B, and C can be transformed into each other by a continuous deformation, irrespective of its strength. More generally, any two topologically equivalent objects can be transformed into each other by an arbitrary continuous deformation, such as stretching and compression. In contrast, deformations that involve cutting, tearing, or attachment alter topological invariants. These deformations are called discontinuous in that a topological invariant abruptly changes at a certain moment. The deformation from C to D belongs to this case because the topological invariant changes from zero to unity. The transition between topologically distinct states is called a topological phase transition.
The definition of topological equivalence implies that if a physical phenomenon is characterized by a topological invariant, then the phenomenon does not change under any continuous deformation. This perspective is fundamentally different from the previous understanding that phases of matter can be described by spontaneous symmetry breaking. This robust feature of topology has spawned a new paradigm called topological order1 and has explained many experimental observations that could not be described by other concepts. A good example is the quantum Hall effect2, in which the Hall conductance of a 2D electron gas under an external magnetic field has a quantized value with remarkable precision regardless of the charge density and impurities in the sample. This extraordinary behavior cannot be explained by Landau’s local-order parameters3 but can be understood by topological order.
Topology is becoming a universal notion throughout physics. Starting from condensed matter physics4, the concept of topology has been extended to various systems, including photonics, phononics5, mechanics6, and cold atomic gases7. In particular, the implementation of topology in photonics has been motivated by three reasons. First, photonics provides a concrete and versatile platform for realizing and exploring topological features because the photon wavelength is much longer than the electron wavelength. Photons have wavelengths on the order of hundreds of nanometers for visible light and larger for lower frequencies, whereas electrons with 1 eV energy have wavelengths on the order of nanometers. Therefore, without going down to the atomic level, the photonic band structure and its topology can be engineered by appropriately artificially structuring and arranging the unit design on a scale comparable to or smaller than the wavelength. The booming interest in light manipulation over the past couple of decades using photonic crystals and metamaterials has facilitated topological photonic band engineering. Indeed, despite the fundamental difference between fermionic and bosonic systems, many extraordinary features that have been predicted in condensed matter physics or high-energy physics have been found in photonics. Second, consisting of two vector fields, electromagnetic waves enable richer physics compared to other classical scalar waves. For example, electromagnetic duality can be used to emulate electronic spin states8, and the vectorial nature of electric fields gives rise to the definition of polarization and to resultant properties such as chirality9. Last, adding topology to photonics facilitates robust control of photons on a wavelength scale. Current communication technologies use electrons as information carriers. However, compared to electrons, photons are faster, dissipate less, and support more channels. However, because the propagation of photons is sensitive to the surface at a scale comparable to the wavelength, impurities and defects at the surface easily scatter photons. Therefore, optical communication relies on guiding based on the refractive index, such as in optical fibers, which makes the whole system bulky. Topology can provide a solution to this practical problem by providing a robust way to control photons in compact systems. The application of topology to photonics may yield many practical applications, such as compact waveguides with no bending loss, lasers, and cavities.
During the past several years, there has been vast progress in topological photonics. The emerging fields of topological photonics have been reviewed many times10–16. A comprehensive review13 exists that covers most of the progress in topological photonics in a broad aspect, in addition to some reviews focused on specific topics, such as two-dimensional (2D) topological photonics12,16, topological nanophotonics15, active topological photonics17, nonlinear topological photonics18, and topological photonics using synthetic dimensions14. However, approaches to three-dimensional (3D) photonic topological phases have been considered only as a minor part of these reviews. Additionally, following the rapid progress in topological photonics, a review that covers the latest achievements is in demand. Therefore, this review is devoted to 3D topological phases and their photonic realization and to the latest progress in this rapidly evolving field.
In the first part, we review topological band theory and three 2D topological phases: the quantum Hall, quantum spin Hall, and quantum valley Hall phases. The basics of topological band theory and some representative topological phases have been previously reviewed4,19,20. However, they are mostly described in the context of condensed matter physics and are difficult to follow for general readers in photonics who do not have a firm background in this field. Thus, we concisely review the basics of topological band theory and some 2D topological phases, especially for readers who are interested in topological photonics but are not familiar with condensed matter physics. Before finishing this section, we briefly cover other topological phases, such as the Floquet topological phase and Zak phase.
Then, we cover 3D photonic topological phases and various approaches for realizing them. We aim to discuss photonic systems with 3D topological phases and especially focus on approaches that use photonic crystals or metamaterials. Various symmetry breakings and material responses to achieve topological phases are elucidated. The symmetries referred to in this review are visualized in Table 1. Five symmetries, time-reversal symmetry (), inversion symmetry (), glide reflection symmetry, screw symmetry and electromagnetic duality, are discussed. refers to a symmetry under time-reversal operation21 (t → −t). , glide reflection symmetry and screw symmetry are spatial symmetries related to symmetries under spatial transformation21,22. Electromagnetic duality is associated with a symmetry between electric and magnetic fields and is an intrinsic property of the Maxwell equations in vacuum23. Not only symmetries but also material responses can be exploited to realize topological phases. Five material responses, gyrotropic24, bianisotropic25, chiral26, hyperbolic27, and double hyperbolic28 responses, the constitutive equations of which are shown in Table 2, will be covered.
Table 1.
Symmetries | Operation |
---|---|
Time-reversal symmetry21 () | t → −t, x → x, E → E, H → −H |
Inversion symmetry21 (or parity symmetry, ) | x → −x, t → t, E → −E, H → H |
Glide reflection symmetry22 | Reflection + translation |
Screw symmetry22 | Rotation + translation along the rotational axis |
Electromagnetic duality23 | E → −cB, cB → E, ε = αμ (α is a constant scalar) |
The bold values indicate that the quantity is a vector
Table 2.
Material responses | Constitutive equations |
---|---|
Gyrotropic24 | Gyroelectric , Gryomagnetic |
Bianisotropic25 (magneto-electric coupling) | |
Chiral26 | |
Hyperbolic27 |
One or two components among εx, εy, and εz have the opposite sign. |
Double hyperbolic28 |
One or two components among εx, εy, and εz have the opposite sign, and one or two components among μx, μy, and μz have the opposite sign. |
The bold values indicate that the quantity is a vector
In the last part, to follow the rapid development of topological photonics, some recently emerging fields that have not hitherto been discussed by previous reviews are focused on. More specifically, this part includes six subtopics: stacked topological photonic crystals for layer pseudospin, Weyl degeneracies in nonzero dimensions, unidirectional Maxwellian spin waves, higher-order photonic topological phases, interactions between light and topological phases and progress towards application of topological photonics. We conclude this review by providing a perspective on this promising field.
Topological band theory
Conventional band theory in photonics has been developed for photonic crystals29–31. Similar to electrons propagating through a crystal, photons in a photonic crystal experience a periodic potential, and the global features can be delineated by the photonic band structure32. The photonic band dispersion, which has been generally discussed in terms of the photonic band gap, has another interesting characteristic called topology. The topology originates from winding of eigenmodes in momentum space and can be characterized by a topological invariant. Apart from the band dispersion, each band has a topological invariant that is zero for topologically trivial cases and nonzero for topologically nontrivial cases. Two bands are defined to be topologically equivalent if they can be adiabatically transformed into each other33. Therefore, two topologically equivalent insulators are connected by a continuous deformation, along which a band gap remains open. In contrast, a topological insulator and an ordinary insulator cannot be adiabatically transformed into each other. Instead, they can only be interconverted if the band gap is closed and reopened33. The band gap closing corresponds to cutting of the photonic band dispersion in momentum space and alters the bulk topology. This topological phase transition ensures gapless boundary modes at the interfaces between a topological insulator and an ordinary insulator. The existence of these edge modes across the band gap is consistent with the definition of topological equivalence of bands and is closely related to the bulk topology. Indeed, the number of gapless edge modes is equal to the difference between the topological invariants of the two media34,35. This so-called bulk-boundary correspondence34,35 dictates that the number of lower-dimensional modes, or boundary modes, is determined by the topology of the bulk states. Because the existence of the gapless boundary modes is protected by the bulk topology, these modes provide robust characteristics insensitive to small perturbations that do not change topology.
In this section, we discuss a few representative 2D topological phases by classifying them according to their topological invariants. Three topological phases—the quantum Hall phase, quantum spin Hall phase, and quantum valley Hall phase—are reviewed (Fig. 2a–c) and compared to the ordinary insulating phase (Fig. 2d). A brief and general discussion on other topological phases then follows. Since the details of such topological phases4,19,20 and attempts in photonics to emulate them10,12,13 can be found elsewhere in the literature, we do not go into detail but discuss important features and conditions so that readers who are not familiar with topology can grasp the concept and appreciate the rest of the paper.
Quantum Hall phase
The discovery of the quantum Hall phase goes back to 1980 when Klitzing, Dorda, and Pepper observed that a 2D electron gas under a perpendicular magnetic field has a quantized Hall conductance2. This effect corresponds to the quantum version of the conventional Hall effect, in which electrons in a metal plate under an applied magnetic field are deflected by the Lorentz force. In contrast to the Hall effect, the strong magnetic field and cryogenic conditions in the quantum Hall state accentuate the quantized feature of the Hall conductance. It was later revealed that a magnetic flux is not a necessary condition for such quantum Hall effects19. Other mechanisms, such as magnetization and strong spin–orbit coupling in magnetic materials that break , can induce a similar effect in the absence of a magnetic field19.
The signature of the quantum Hall phase is that electrons are localized in the bulk but unidirectionally propagate along the boundaries (Fig. 2a, top row). The broken makes the propagation of edge modes chiral. In other words, electrons propagate either counterclockwise or clockwise. Propagation in the reverse direction is not allowed, as implied by the fixed sign of the group velocity (Fig. 2a, middle row). Therefore, the edge states are not back-scattered, even in the presence of large defects. A topological invariant of the quantum Hall phase is the integer of the Hall conductance, which is called the Chern number (or TKNN invariant)1,36
1 |
where BZ denotes the Brillouin zone, is the Berry curvature of the n-th band, and is the n-th eigenstate37. An example of the Berry curvature of a system possessing the quantum Hall phase is shown in Fig. 2a, bottom row. The Chern number of a medium that possesses a quantum Hall phase is nonzero.
It has been suggested that photons in 2D photonic crystals composed of magnetoelectric materials behave like electrons under the quantum Hall effect38,39. The magnetoelectric coupling breaks , resulting in a nonzero Chern number across a photonic band gap. At the band gap, chiral edge transport immune from back-scattering was theoretically predicted39. Gyromagnetic photonic crystals, which exhibit strong gyromagnetic anisotropy, have been proposed as a realistic platform to manifest the photonic analog of the quantum Hall effect40. This theoretical prediction was soon experimentally confirmed in the microwave regime by showing chiral edge propagation robust against an artificially introduced scatterer41. The quantum Hall phase has also been demonstrated in photonics using Floquet-like waveguide arrays42, dynamic modulation43, magnetoplasmons44, and graphene45.
Quantum spin Hall phase
Difficulties in applying magnetic fields and the scarcity of gyromaterials make it difficult to realize the quantum Hall effect. Challenges in breaking have motivated the search for topological phases in -invariant systems. Spin, a fundamental characteristic of electrons, provides a solution. According to Kramers’ theorem46, all eigenstates of a system that possesses half-integer spin are at least doubly degenerate under . Because electrons with spin-up experience different forces than electrons with spin-down in the presence of spin–orbit coupling, the two classes of electrons may have different topological behaviors despite the degenerate energy level. In other words, electrons with spin-up may propagate along the boundaries counterclockwise while electrons with spin-down propagate clockwise, or vice versa (Fig. 2b, top row). At the band gap of a quantum spin Hall insulator, gapless edge states for each spin exist, and the sign of the group velocity of the edge states is locked by the spin (Fig. 2b, middle row). This spin-momentum-locked characteristic47,48 enables topologically protected helical edge states that propagate without back-scattering if the spin is not flipped.
This quantum spin Hall state can be viewed as two copies of the quantum Hall state for each spin. The Berry curvature of the quantum spin Hall phase is spin-dependent. For example, the Berry curvature of electrons with spin-up is positive, and that of electrons with spin-down is negative (Fig. 2b, bottom row). Thus, the Chern number calculated for a specific spin has a nonzero value under (C↑ = − C↓ ≠ 0, where C↑ is the Chern number of spin-up electrons and C↓ is the Chern number of spin-down electrons), although the Chern number of the two spins cancel each other, leading to a zero Chern number (C = C↑ + C↓ = 0). This is a relaxed condition compared to the quantum Hall phase, considering that a nonzero spin Chern number Cspin = (C↑ − C↓)/2 instead of a nonzero Chern number suffices. The quantum spin Hall phase is characterized by the invariant, which is associated with the spin Chern number by4,49,50 Cspin(mod 2). The Z2 invariant has only two integer values: 0 for topologically trivial cases and 1 for nontrivial cases.
At a glance, the quantum spin Hall phase seems incompatible with photonics. Kramers’ theorem is not applicable to photons because they do not have half-integer spins. However, photons, even in free space, have spin properties as a result of circular polarization9,51. The spin-locked characteristics of boundary modes have been studied for 2D interfaces between vacuum and a metal9, between dielectric media, between a metal and a dielectric47, and between definite and indefinite anisotropic media52. Additionally, photons inside structured matter can have a spin-like quantity called pseudospin by using electromagnetic duality8 or crystalline symmetries53 to emulate the fermionic operator . The photonic analog of the quantum spin Hall phase has been actively investigated using a 2D array of resonators54,55 and photonic crystals that possess crystalline symmetries53,56,57. In the latter instance, a quantum spin Hall phase of a perturbed photonic crystal has an integer Cspin only in the limit of zero-order perturbation theory58. Beyond this limit, Cspin may depend on the strength of the perturbation and cannot serve as a topological invariant.
Quantum valley Hall phase
In the previous section, we reviewed the quantum spin Hall phase, where the spin degree of freedom guarantees spin-polarized topological edge states. Similarly, there exists another binary degree of freedom: a valley has recently been identified as a candidate to yield a new topological phase under , the so-called quantum valley Hall phase. A valley refers to momentum with a local energy extremum. When a Dirac point at a valley is lifted by symmetry breaking, the band gap may support the quantum valley Hall phase. In a quantum valley Hall system, electrons at different valleys (K and K′) propagate along the boundaries in the opposite directions (Fig. 2c, top row). The edge state dispersion of a quantum valley Hall insulator exhibits opposite signs of the group velocity (Fig. 2c, middle row).
Breaking of is a prerequisite of the quantum valley Hall phase. This condition can be easily understood by symmetry consideration of Berry curvatures. The Berry curvature of the n-th band satisfies Fn(k) = −Fn(−k) under and Fn(k) = Fn(−k) under . Therefore, the Berry curvature is zero in the whole BZ in a system that preserves both and . However, in a system that lacks , the Berry curvature can have a nonzero value localized at valleys (Fig. 2c, bottom row). The Berry curvature at the two valleys K and K′ have opposite signs, which leads to a total Chern number of zero. The topological invariant of the quantum valley Hall effect is Cvalley, which can be calculated by replacing the BZ in Eq. (1) with the half of the BZ around the valley. Along the interfaces between media with distinct Cvalley, this valley-momentum locking enables edge transport robust against perturbations that do not cause intervalley scattering59.
Despite the relatively short history compared to that of the quantum Hall and quantum spin Hall effects, the quantum valley Hall effect has been intensively studied. Before finishing this section, we briefly introduce recent work on the quantum valley Hall phase in photonics. The quantum valley Hall effect in photonics was first proposed in 2016 by breaking the of triangularly arranged dielectric rods59. Before is broken, the photonic crystal consists of circular rods arranged in a hexagonal lattice, in which the spatial symmetry gives rise to a Dirac point at valleys. Application of a -breaking perturbation by changing the cross-sectional shape of the rods from circles to triangles suppresses the intervalley scattering, which lifts the Dirac point and opens a complete band gap. The authors numerically demonstrated unidirectional propagation of edge states and efficient in-coupling and out-coupling59. The quantum valley Hall effect and valley-dependent robust propagation have been experimentally observed in microwaves using designer surface plasmon crystals60. Studies on valley-dependent transport were further extended to surface waves that propagate in a specified direction determined by their spins inside a bulk photonic crystal61. In this case, is broken by differentiating the heights of the two sublattices of the honeycomb lattice. The quantum valley Hall effect has been confirmed numerically by using dielectric rods in a perturbed kagome lattice62 and experimentally by using coupled waveguide arrays with detuned refractive indices63, a dielectric slab with air holes with a -breaking shape64,65 and -broken connected dielectrics that have dual-band edge states66. The quantum valley Hall phase can also be implemented in an active system. Recently, topologically protected lasing modes were demonstrated by combining the quantum valley Hall effect with an electrically pumped laser67.
A photonic crystal can simultaneously possess both valley-dependent and spin-dependent properties. A hexagonal array of staggered bianisotropic rods has a bulk dispersion, for which the spin-dependent features appear in a valley. The interaction between the valley and spin enables valley-selective net spin flow inside bulk photonic crystals68. Additionally, the quantum spin and valley Hall phases can be independently controlled in a photonic crystal. In such a system, two perturbations, one to induce a quantum spin Hall phase by adding bianisotropy and the other to induce a quantum valley Hall phase by breaking , are present. The topological phase of the system is determined by the relative strengths of the two perturbations. By varying the strengths of the two perturbations, a topological phase transition between the quantum spin and valley Hall phases was demonstrated. This work suggested a photonic system in which the topological phase can be controlled by both the spin and valley degrees of freedom69.
Other topological phases
In addition to the aforementioned three topological phases, there are other topological phases that originate from different mechanisms. One example is the Floquet topological phase, which can be understood as a time counterpart of the Bloch theorem. Floquet’s theorem states that a solution of a time-periodic Hamiltonian can be expressed by multiplying a time-periodic function by a phase term70. This theorem has been used to study periodically driven quantum systems. Interesting phenomena occur when we examine the results of the time periodicity. As a translational symmetry originating from a potential periodic in space gives rise to conservation of quasi-momentum71 (crystal momentum), a potential periodic in time results in conservation of a quantity according to Noether’s theorem72. This conserved quantity is a quasi-energy and can serve as an additional dimension along with crystal momenta. Therefore, similar to how spatially periodic structures can possess a topological phase, a system under periodic temporal modulation can also support a topological phase called the Floquet topological phase73–76. This phenomenon has also been realized in photonics by using time-dependent index modulation77,78 and by using the propagation axis of a waveguide array to mimic a time-like axis42,79,80.
Another topological phase is called the Zak phase, along with its 2D version81,82. The Zak phase is obtained by integrating the Berry connection along one wave vector axis and can be viewed as a 1D version of the Berry phase. The topology of the Zak phase originates in bulk polarization, or a shift of the Wannier band, and can have only two values: 0 for trivial topology and π for nontrivial topology81. The edge modes in a 2D system that carry the nontrivial Zak phase are floating in the band gap and not connected to the bulk bands. Additionally, the topological protection of the Zak phase is weak compared to the previously mentioned topological phases82.
Three-dimensional photonic topological phases
3D gapped phase
In the previous section, the topological phases of 2D insulators were reviewed. Such systems are generally composed of unit cells periodically arranged along two axes, and the resultant two crystal momenta form the 2D BZ. The gapped 2D bulk states support gapless edge states with topological protection. The 2D topological insulating phases can be further extended to 3D by using a 3D crystalline structure that consists of unit cells periodically arranged along all three spatial directions. These 3D gapless topological phases, also known as 3D topological insulating phases, are attributed to the 3D band gap that separates topologically inequivalent bands. If two 3D bulk bands, one of which is above the band gap and the other below it, are topologically distinct, then gapless surface states appear inside the band gap83–85 (Fig. 3a) as 2D gapped bulk states host gapless edge states in 2D topological phases. The edge states of 2D topological insulators are confined in a 2D plane, so their propagations are protected by topology only along the planar directions. In contrast, the surface states of 3D topological insulators are confined in all three spatial directions86. In other words, a 3D photonic gapped phase enables photons to propagate robustly against defects along any spatial direction without being limited to a certain plane.
3D gapped topological phases can be realized in both -broken and -invariant systems. The 3D quantum Hall phase, which can be regarded as a 3D extended version of the 2D quantum Hall phase, corresponds to the -broken case. The Chern number, the topological invariant of the 2D quantum Hall phase, is defined only in even spatial dimensions. In 3D cases, the quantum Hall phase is characterized by a triad of Chern numbers: C(1) ≡ (Cx(1), Cy(1), Cz(1)), where Cj(1) is the Chern number of the 2D momentum plane normal to the j-axis. The superscript (1) is added to distinguish the Chern numbers from the second Chern number87, which characterizes the quantum Hall phases in four dimensions88.
The 3D quantum Hall phase has been theoretically predicted by examining 3D electron gases under magnetic fields89–91 and has been experimentally demonstrated using semiconductor superlattices constructed by stacking 2D quantum Hall insulators with appropriate interlayer coupling92. However, the 3D quantum Hall phase in a strict sense, with surface states closed along the stacking direction, was only recently observed93. A quantized Hall resistivity and conductive surface states were confirmed in ZrTe5 crystals under magnetic fields. A photonic analog of the 3D quantum Hall phase was theoretically proposed by using photonic crystals composed of gyroelectric materials94. A magnetic field bias breaks and produces a band gap and topological surface states within the gap.
Similarly, the 3D quantum spin Hall phase can be viewed as a generalization of the 2D quantum spin Hall phase and corresponds to the -invariant case. The 3D quantum spin Hall phase is characterized by four invariants83–85 (ν0; ν1 ν2 ν3). To understand these invariants, we imagine a kx − ky plane by fixing the kz of a given 3D BZ. A invariant can be defined in only two momentum planes, kz = 0 and kz = π/a, where a is a lattice constant, as they are the only -symmetric planes. If the invariants of the two planes are distinct, then the invariants of the two planes defined by the other two directions should also be different85. This change in invariants between two planes is described by the strong topological invariant ν0; if one of the planes has = 0 and the other has = 1, then the system is topologically nontrivial and has ν0 = 1. In contrast, if the invariants of the two planes are the same, then the system has ν0 = 0 and is trivial. The other three invariants are weak invariants, each of which corresponds to the invariant of ki = π/a (i = {x, y, z})83.
ν0 classifies 3D quantum spin Hall insulators into weak topological insulators (ν0 = 0) and strong topological insulators4,33 (ν0 = 1). Weak topological insulators can be achieved by layering 2D quantum spin Hall insulators similar to how 3D quantum Hall insulators are formed by stacking 2D quantum Hall insulators. For weak topological insulators, the invariants of the two 2D planes (kz = 0 and kz = π/a) are the same, so only an even number of surface Dirac cones are possible4,33. On the other hand, strong topological insulators require other mechanisms, such as strong spin–orbit coupling, and support an odd number of surface Dirac cones95,96. In 2011, the first proposal of a 3D topological insulating phase in photonics was reported97. Following the scheme of topological crystalline insulators in an electronic system98, a tetragonal lattice of uniaxial dielectric cavities in a lossless metallic host was investigated using a coupled dipole method. This system with and point-group symmetry exhibits a complete 3D band gap and gapless topological surface states. Topological photonic systems with 3D band gaps have also been proposed by using 3D bianisotropic structures86,99,100 and a 2D crystalline structure with a synthetic dimension78.
3D gapless phase
The 3D gapped phase is not the only type of phase possible among 3D topological phases. Discovery of a 3D gapless bulk dispersion that hosts nontrivial band topology101–106 refuted the perception that topological features necessarily require a band gap and has extended our understanding of the topological phases. The 3D gapless topological phase, also known as the topological semimetal phase, is a new topological phase of matter different from the topological insulating phase (Fig. 3b, c). Unlike 3D gapped phases, the 3D gapless phase has no 2D counterpart. Instead of a band gap, the 3D gapless topological phases are characterized by Weyl degeneracies, which are degeneracies between topologically inequivalent bands. The main signature of 3D gapless topological phases is a 0D Weyl degeneracy, called a Weyl point, which is said to be type-I if the equi-frequency surface at the Weyl frequency is point-like (Fig. 3b) and type-II otherwise (Fig. 3c).
Aside from the different dimensionality, Weyl points are distinct from 2D Dirac points, which are nodal points in 2D momentum space, in some other aspects. The existence of 2D Dirac points is protected by symmetry. Thus, they can be easily removed if either or is broken. In contrast, Weyl points exist in systems that lack , , or both, so Weyl points cannot be eliminated by breaking or . This can be understood in that they are monopoles of the Berry curvature in 3D momentum space. Each Weyl point serves as a source or drain of the Berry curvature and carries a quantized topological charge. Thus, two Weyl points always come in pairs with opposite signs of charge and can be created or eliminated only when the Weyl point pairs are generated together or annihilate each other101. The topological charge, often called the chirality, of a Weyl point is a topological invariant of 3D gapless phases and can be obtained by integrating the Berry curvature over a small sphere enclosing the Weyl point101.
Studies on 3D gapless phases are closely related to Weyl physics. This physics addresses a Weyl particle, which is a solution of the massless Dirac equation, also known as the Weyl equation107. The existence of Weyl particles was uncertain for a long time until they were concurrently found in electronic103,104 and photonic108 systems by three independent groups. These demonstrations were remarkable achievements because no Weyl point had ever been previously identified, while studies on Weyl particles trace back to the early twentieth century107. Near Weyl points, electrons (or photons in a photonic system) behave as Weyl particles, which are relativistic particles that have charge but no mass. Another interesting feature of Weyl points is the existence of a Fermi arc between a pair of Weyl points101,103,109. The Fermi arc corresponds to topologically protected surface states resilient to perturbations.
Analogously, photonic systems that host Weyl points exhibit topological surface states, which are often called photonic Fermi arcs. The photonic counterparts of these advances in condensed matter physics have been investigated over the past several years. The first achievement in 3D topological photonics was the numerical demonstration of a Weyl point using photonic crystals108. Since then, photonic systems that possess Weyl points have been extensively studied and realized in homogeneous media110,111, photonic crystals112–116, and metamaterials109,117–119. Such Weyl systems have exhibited various unprecedented phenomena, such as topological surface states connecting a pair of Weyl points120, the quantum anomalous Hall effect105, and chiral anomalies121.
Approaches to realize 3D photonic topological phases
In this section, we review 3D photonic topological systems, especially focusing on a variety of approaches to achieve 3D topological phases and related phenomena. For the photonic analog of a 3D topological phase, at least one of or must be broken108. We review the first demonstrations of 3D photonic topological systems that broke either or , or both simultaneously. Then, we discuss -breaking approaches, followed by -breaking approaches.
The first realization of a 3D photonic topological phase was achieved by breaking the symmetries of double gyroid photonic crystals (Fig. 4a–d)108. An array of a single gyroid possesses a wide and complete band gap (Fig. 4a, red lines), whereas a double gyroid photonic crystal, whose unit cell consists of a single gyroid and its inversion counterpart, exhibits a gapless dispersion with a three-fold quadratic nodal point (Fig. 4a, blue lines). The band structure and its topology were studied by breaking symmetries of the double gyroid photonic crystal. The authors first introduced two -symmetric air spheres into the double gyroids. Under this perturbation that preserves both and , the trivial nodal point is converted into a two-fold nodal ring. However, the nodal ring is topologically trivial as a result of and . Weyl points appear when either or is broken. Breaking by applying the perturbation in which only one air sphere is added without its inversion counterpart leads to four Weyl points (Fig. 4b). This corresponds to the minimal number of Weyl points in -invariant systems because a Weyl point at k has a time-reversal pair with the same chirality at −k under and another Weyl pair with opposite chirality should exist to neutralize the first pair. In contrast, breaking by assuming the gyroid to be a gyroelectric material under a biased magnetic field results in two Weyl points aligned along the magnetic field direction (Fig. 4c). The double gyroid photonic crystal and -broken and -broken structures are illustrated in Fig. 4d. Simultaneous breaking of and by varying their strength has revealed a topological phase transition between pure -breaking and -breaking phases. As the amplitude of the magnetic field in a -broken system increases, a pair of Weyl points with the same chirality moves parallel to the magnetic field direction. When the -breaking perturbation is strong enough, the Weyl pair finally merges with a Weyl point with opposite chirality, forming a -dominant topological phase. Since the proposal of the Weyl point, 3D photonic topological systems have been intensively studied using various schemes, as we will see in the following section.
By breaking the time-reversal symmetry
Realization of a 3D topological phase by breaking provides a concrete platform in which gapless surface states are protected by topology regardless of the spin or valley. Therefore, -broken topological systems are robust against perturbations that cause spin flipping or valley flipping. However, despite the large number of theoretical investigations and experimental demonstrations of 2D topological phases by breaking 41–45,122–129, there exist few examples of 3D photonic topological systems with broken . Therefore, in this section, we review -broken 3D photonic topological systems without further classifying them. We discuss theoretical approaches towards 3D gapped and gapless dispersions by using -broken photonic crystals. Then, homogeneous photonic topological systems based on magnetized plasmas and recent experimental demonstrations are reviewed. Last, we briefly mention 3D photonic topological phases using Floquet’s theorem.
A photonic analog of a 3D strong topological insulator was reported in 2016, in which the surface Dirac cone is protected by crystalline symmetry94. The unit structure consists of four identical gyroelectric rods with and two glide reflection symmetries (Fig. 4e). When there is no perturbation, the photonic crystal possesses a four-fold Dirac point at the boundary of the BZ; this Dirac point is slightly different from other Dirac points in that it splits into four singlets instead of into two doublets. Breaking of by applying alternating magnetizations on the gyroelectric rods while preserving the glide reflection symmetries splits the 3D Dirac point and leads to a single surface Dirac cone (Fig. 4f). The surface Dirac cone is protected by the glide symmetries. Therefore, gapless surface states are observed under the glide symmetries, but the surface states are gapped when the glide symmetries are broken (Fig. 4g).
Breaking of can also yield a 3D gapless dispersion by splitting a Dirac point into a pair of Weyl points. In comparison to the -broken case, Weyl points in -broken systems have been known to support exotic phenomena such as chiral Majorana edge states and zero modes44,130, chiral and gravitational anomalies118,131, giant photocurrents132, and quantum oscillation phenomena133. A tetrahedral photonic crystal composed of anisotropic gyroelectric materials has been proposed to host Weyl points112. The tetrahedral photonic crystal with broken possesses a three-fold nodal point. Under a magnetic field, the trivial nodal point is lifted, and Weyl points and the consequential topological surface states were numerically demonstrated112.
In these photonic crystal-based approaches108,112, judiciously designed structures arranged in an adequate lattice are essential. However, Weyl points can also exist in a homogeneous medium: a magnetized plasma, which is a free electron gas under a static magnetic field111. If the magnetic field is strong enough that the cyclotron frequency exceeds the plasma frequency, then the longitudinal plasma modes linearly cross the transverse helical modes. This forms two pairs of Weyl points along the magnetic field direction at the plasma frequency. The Weyl points are at the transition between the type-I and type-II states as a result of the flat longitudinal modes at the plasma frequency. This magnetized plasma system has clear advantages over other photonic crystal-based systems: complicated structures are not required, and topological phases can be dynamically controlled by tuning the amplitude and direction of the external magnetic field.
This system was recently experimentally realized by exploiting indium antimonide (InSb), which behaves like a magnetized plasma under a magnetic field in the terahertz regime110. The synthetic parameter space (kx, ky, B) was used instead of (kx, ky, kz) to facilitate the experiment because the strength of the magnetic field acts similarly to kz in the Hamiltonian. Therefore, to obtain the band dispersion, the authors fabricated an InSb sample with a metal grating to compensate for the phase mismatch (Fig. 4h) and then measured the reflection spectrum under varying magnetic field. The InSb sample under the magnetic field supports linear band crossing in the terahertz regime (Fig. 4i). The measured reflection spectrum manifests a band crossing at 0.31 THz, which corresponds to a Weyl point, and surface states (Fig. 4j). The topological surface states were further observed under a different measurement setup, where the beam was obliquely injected into the tilted grating on the InSb substrate.
A 3D photonic topological phase can be realized in a slightly different scheme using Floquet’s theorem. A periodically driven 3D network composed of vertically stacked 2D networks can host an ordinary insulating phase, a topological insulating phase, or a topological semimetal phase depending on the coupling strength134,135. It is also possible to attain a 3D gapless topological phase possessing Weyl points77,136 and a 3D gapped topological phase78 in a 2D array of resonators by dynamic modulation.
By breaking the inversion symmetry using photonic crystals
An alternative way to achieve 3D photonic topological systems is by breaking . In this section, we review various numerical and experimental demonstrations of -invariant 3D photonic topological systems realized by using photonic crystals. The of a photonic crystal can be broken by designing a -broken unit cell. This can be realized by, for example, combining two structures that are not -symmetric108 or breaking the symmetry along the vertical direction116. In addition to the double gyroid photonic crystal with air holes, many attempts have been made to achieve a 3D topological phase by using -broken photonic crystals. An early study used a superlattice of photonic crystals, in which the unit cell was composed of three stacked layers of hexagonal patterns of dielectrics137. The authors changed a geometrical parameter of each layer to break . The resulting unit cell is composed of three unit cells with slightly modified geometries and has a gapless bulk dispersion possessing Weyl points.
The first experimental observation of Weyl points was demonstrated in the microwave range by using double gyroid photonic crystals with broken .114 A single gyroid photonic crystal was fabricated by drilling air holes in a high index dielectric material (Fig. 5a) and then combining the perforated material with its -broken counterpart. The -broken double gyroid photonic crystals possess two Weyl points in the microwave regime (Fig. 5b). Because transmission is generally proportional to the bulk density of states, an angle-resolved transmission spectrum was measured to probe the bulk dispersion. The measured spectrum clearly showed a band crossing that corresponds to a type-I Weyl point (Fig. 5c). The four Weyl points with equal frequency in -broken double gyroid photonic crystals have potential practical applications, such as in angular and frequency selectivity, invisibility cloaking and 3D imaging138.
Weyl points can also be experimentally demonstrated by observing conical diffraction, which is a signature of type-II Weyl systems, as implied by the conical equi-frequency curves at the Weyl point. Weyl points have been observed by probing conical diffraction at optical wavelengths116. The sample consisted of two interpenetrating square lattices of helical waveguides with a relative phase difference of π (Fig. 5d) and was fabricated by femtosecond direct laser writing. Such photonic crystals support type-II Weyl points (Fig. 5e). The intensity on one side was measured during excitation of the opposite side and showed conical diffraction at the Weyl frequency (Fig. 5f). Topological surface states were also observed by exciting the center of the top surface. Weyl points have also been demonstrated using -broken gyroid photonic crystals coated with layered composite nanometric materials139.
Weyl points may carry multiple topological charges higher than unity if an additional spatial symmetry exists that causes overlap of several Weyl points with a single topological charge113. To find such multiple Weyl points, the authors used a photonic crystal with a honeycomb lattice, which is known to produce Dirac points in the 2D BZ, and then introduced chiral interlayer coupling (Fig. 5g). Symmetry analysis showed that the double and triple Weyl points are protected by rotational symmetries: C3 symmetry and for double Weyl points and C6 symmetry and for triple Weyl points (Fig. 5h). The measured transmission along the samples with and without defects showed similar results, proving that the surface states are not scattered by the defects (Fig. 5i). Soon afterward, multiple Weyl points were theoretically demonstrated in a simple woodpile structure of photonic crystals140.
If two Weyl points with opposite signs of chirality merge, the resultant 3D Dirac point has a topological charge of zero due to the annihilation and thus may exist under both and . Similar to the multiple Weyl point cases, the additional degeneracy between two Weyl pairs requires spatial symmetries such as point group symmetry141 and nonsymmorphic symmetry142. These Dirac points are distinct from other unpaired Dirac points143 in that they are paired as a result of the overlap of two Weyl point pairs and carry a nontrivial Z2 topological phase. Therefore, when the symmetry that ensures overlap of two Weyl pairs breaks, the 3D Dirac point splits into Weyl points144.
In a topological semimetal, the dispersion of surface states can be mapped to helicoid Riemann surfaces (Fig. 5k)145. However, observation of the helicoidal dispersion of topological surface states has been elusive because of the other bulk bands at the Weyl frequency. It was recently proposed that the helicoidal dispersion may be observable in an ideal Weyl system in which all Weyl points are located at the same frequency and separated from the other bands115. To realize this ideal Weyl system, a saddle-shaped metallic coil was designed as a unit structure (Fig. 5j). The metallic coil lacks while possessing D2d point group symmetry and is periodically arranged in a tetragonal lattice. As a consequence of the absence of other bands at the Weyl frequency, a helicoidal dispersion of the topological surface states could be observed by near-field scanning measurement (Fig. 5l). The existence of the Weyl points was experimentally verified by measuring the angle-resolved transmission.
Recently, an approach for hosting a -breaking topological phase in a -invariant system has been reported118. To emulate -breaking, a spatially inhomogeneous structure was designed to induce an artificial magnetic field. Unit cells were designed to support Weyl points that vary spatially in momentum space but are fixed in the frequency axis (Fig. 5m). Starting from the design of a metallic coil that supports four ideal Weyl points115, adiabatic variation of two geometric parameters of the unit structure makes the Weyl points rotate in momentum space (Fig. 5n). The rotating Weyl points were confirmed by near-field scanning measurements. The gauge field resulting from the rotating Weyl points makes this -invariant Weyl system a platform for examining a variety of interesting features that appear under a magnetic field. In the presence of the gauge field, the zeroth Landau level propagates in a chiral way, thereby generating a chiral anomaly. This chiral anomaly was observed by placing a source on one side of the sample and then scanning the near field of the transmitted beam. The Fourier-transformed image of the scanned field at the top (bottom) surface obtained while exciting the sample on the other side dominantly showed positive (negative) Weyl points, as shown in Fig. 5o. This result is consistent with the theoretical prediction that the Landau levels for Weyl points with positive (negative) chirality support a chiral zero mode with a positive (negative) group velocity.
By breaking the inversion symmetry using metamaterials
Photonic crystals play a major role in realizing topological photonic bands. However, there is another way to yield topological phases by a radically different mechanism. Metamaterials, which are artificially designed materials to possess extraordinary optical properties, can be exploited to achieve topological phases. Here, the criterion used to distinguish metamaterials from photonic crystals is the validity of the effective medium approximation. Photonic crystals are periodically arranged structures in which the band dispersion is strictly determined by the periodic arrangement and its scale. In contrast, metamaterials that work at the same frequency generally possess much smaller dimensions and can be regarded as homogeneous media. As some readers might sense, the boundaries of this classification are somewhat vague. The operating wavelength is a range, not a specific value, and no strict criterion can be used to determine whether the scale is comparable to or much smaller than the wavelength. In this review, photonic topological systems for which topological phases are attributed to effective parameters are categorized as topological metamaterials.
Whereas the properties of naturally occurring materials are determined by the chemical constituents and their arrangements, the optical properties of metamaterials depend on the artificial unit structure. If the unit structure is much smaller than the wavelength, then light in the metamaterial behaves as if it propagates through a homogeneous medium with effective properties. In other words, the metamaterial can be described as a homogeneous medium with effective parameters even though it is composed of spatially nonuniform structures.
Interestingly, well-tuned effective parameters of metamaterials can induce topological phases. To understand the underlying principle of topological phases, we examine the most general form of the constitutive equation:
2 |
where is the permittivity tensor, is the permeability tensor, and and are tensors associated with the magnetoelectric coupling. Approaches that use metamaterials can be categorized by the key parameters that produce nontrivial band topology. In this section, we review three different types of topological metamaterials, bianisotropic metamaterials, chiral hyperbolic metamaterials, and Dirac metamaterials, and discuss the key mechanisms of topological phases in each metamaterial using the effective parameters. The constitutive equations of these material responses are summarized in Table 2. Bianisotropic metamaterials obey electromagnetic duality ( for scalar η) and have bianisotropy (off-diagonal elements of ), which in combination yield a 3D gapped phase with an even number of surface Dirac cones. Chiral hyperbolic metamaterials simultaneously have hyperbolic (different signs of diagonal elements of ) and chiral (diagonal elements of ) properties and support a 3D gapless phase with Weyl points. Dirac metamaterials satisfy electromagnetic duality and have double hyperbolicity (different signs of diagonal elements of and simultaneously), which leads to a 3D gapless phase with Dirac points.
We first review bianisotropic metamaterials. The realization of electromagnetic duality and bianisotropy to achieve a topological insulating phase was first proposed in a 2D system8. When for scalar η, the transverse magnetic (TM) and transverse electric (TE) modes are degenerate due to the electromagnetic duality. To build the photonic counterpart of the Kramers degeneracy, the spin states can be defined as , where Ez is the out-of-plane electric field of the TM mode, and Hz is the out-of-plane magnetic field of the TE mode. Then, the two spin states are related as . Therefore, in a -invariant system, the two spin states are doubly degenerate, analogous to Kramers partners. At high symmetric momenta, the bulk states have a gapless dispersion with four-fold Dirac points. Bianisotropy, represented as , is used to produce a band gap. The nonzero off-diagonal components of (, with all other components ) lift the Dirac point in the 2D BZ and open a topological band gap characterized by a nonzero Cspin (Fig. 6a). Bianisotropy plays the role of strong spin–orbit coupling in electronic topological insulators and provides a pathway to directly emulate the Kane–Mele Hamiltonian8. Spin-polarized edge states with topological protection have been demonstrated numerically using a metamaterial composed of a hexagonal array of bianisotropic rods8 and experimentally using a slightly modified design146. Bianisotropy has also stimulated studies on topologically nontrivial 2D photonic crystals, called bianisotropic metawaveguides with relaxed design complexity147–150.
The topological phase of the aforementioned bianisotropic systems is 2D. However, bianisotropy can also induce a 3D topological insulating phase. A 3D topological gapped system mediated by bianisotropy hosts a full band gap in the whole 3D BZ and topological surface states99. A stacked layer of triangular arrays of mirror-symmetry-broken dielectric rods (Fig. 6b) supports a conical dispersion of topological surface states (Fig. 6c) and back-scattering-immune propagation of the surface modes. The broken mirror symmetry makes the in-plane electric and magnetic orbitals couple to each other, which leads to opening of a band gap. The 3D bianisotropic metamaterial is periodic along the out-of-plane direction and therefore has a 3D BZ. The nontrivial 3D topology can be understood as a weak 3D topological insulator, which can be produced by layering arrays of 2D topological systems. Indeed, a bianisotropic metasurface, an array of dielectric bianisotropic unit structures as a 2D version of 3D bianisotropic metamaterials, has been reported to support a 2D topological phase151. In contrast to the linear surface Dirac cones in the triangular lattice, quadratic surface dispersions have been demonstrated in the tetragonal lattice of a similar unit structure100. Recently, a 3D photonic topological system with a complete and broad band gap was proposed by using a 3D array of metallic split-ring resonators86. The authors started with a unit cell composed of six connected split-ring resonators. This mirror-symmetric structure possesses a 3D Dirac point formed by the overlap of two Weyl point pairs. The introduction of bianisotropy by breaking the symmetry along the stacking direction (Fig. 6d) lifts the Dirac point and generates a complete band gap. A gapped bulk dispersion and a surface Dirac cone were observed by Fourier transforming the measured field profile in the bulk and at the domain wall, respectively (Fig. 6e). Robust propagation of surface states was also demonstrated at the interfaces between metamaterials with opposite signs of bianisotropy.
A 3D topological phase can also be obtained by combining chiral and hyperbolic properties152. Chirality is associated with diagonal elements of and gives rise to distinct optical responses of right circularly polarized and left circularly polarized light. Compared to natural chiral materials, which exhibit exceedingly weak chiral responses, chiral metamaterials are designed to exhibit drastically enhanced chiral light–matter interactions. The origin of the nontrivial topology of the chiral hyperbolic metamaterial is illustrated in Fig. 7a. The equi-frequency surface of an isotropic medium is spherical and topologically trivial. In contrast, the equi-frequency surface of chiral metamaterials is split into two concentric spheres with radii corresponding to the refractive indices of the types of two circularly polarized light. The two types of circularly polarized light possess Cspin = ±2 due to the spin nature9. However, a chiral metamaterial cannot provide a photonic analog of the quantum spin Hall phase because of the closed dispersion. A momentum gap can be introduced by adopting hyperbolicity152. Hyperbolic metamaterials refer to metamaterials in which the diagonal components of have opposite signs. Such materials possess equi-frequency contours of a sphere for TE modes and a hyperboloid for TM modes. Although hyperbolic metamaterials are topologically trivial, combining chiral and hyperbolic properties provides a momentum gap between topologically inequivalent modes.
After the first proposal to realize topologically protected surface states in a chiral hyperbolic metamaterial, 3D gapless topological band dispersions and the existence of Weyl points in such materials were reported using effective medium theory117. If we define the uniaxial axis of hyperbolicity as the z-axis, then introducing anisotropy (εxx ≠ εyy) or adding chirality (kxx ≠ 0 or kyy ≠ 0) into the tangential plane lifts doubly degenerate transverse modes, and each transverse mode forms Weyl points by crossing the longitudinal mode. Weyl points and topological surface states that connect the Weyl points were experimentally observed by near-field scanning measurements in the microwave regime109. To simultaneously obtain chiral and hyperbolic properties, a unit cell composed of two layers embedded in a dielectric spacer was employed; the bottom layer was used to realize hyperbolicity, and the top was used to realize chirality (Fig. 7b). The scanned electric field distributions proved that the surface states are immune from back-scattering, and the Fourier-transformed image of the measured electric fields showed topological surface states and Weyl points in momentum space (Fig. 7c–e).
Recently, an array of metallic helices was proposed as a geometrically simple photonic topological platform exhibiting both chiral and hyperbolic properties (Fig. 7f)119,153. One advantage of the metallic helix is that the lowest band has topological features. Because of the geometrical chirality, the eigenmodes of the two lowest bands are circularly polarized at long wavelengths. In the zero frequency limit, modes that have opposite signs of Cspin converge and form a double Weyl point at zero frequency (Fig. 7g). Using this Weyl point at zero frequency, broadband topological surface states with no lower limit were demonstrated in a double-helix array119 (Fig. 7h). In addition to Weyl points, a Weyl nodal surface, which is a 2D degeneracy between topologically inequivalent bands, has been demonstrated in a single-helix array153. The nodal surface originates from the two-fold screw symmetry and , while the origin of the topological charge of the nodal surface lies in the chiral and hyperbolic properties of the helices.
A similar but slightly different metamaterial that possesses topological features is a gyromagnetic hyperbolic metamaterial154,155. Instead of chirality, the gyromagnetic property can be combined with hyperbolicity to yield the photonic counterpart of the quantum Hall phase by breaking .
The last type of topological metamaterial is Dirac metamaterials156. Magnetoelectric coupling plays no role here: . Instead, the topological phases of a Dirac metamaterial lie in electromagnetic duality and double hyperbolicity (Fig. 7i). A conventional hyperbolic medium has different signs of diagonal components of and nonmagnetic responses. The eigenmodes of such a medium are linearly polarized; they can be classified as TE and TM. However, if both the and of the medium have different signs of diagonal components and their ratio is fixed ( with scalar η > 0), then electromagnetic duality holds, and circularly polarized light becomes the eigenmodes. Additionally, this double hyperbolic medium has a gap in momentum space. A pair of 3D Dirac points, which are four-fold nodal points in 3D momentum space, is observed at the frequency where the two tensors satisfy the electromagnetic duality (Fig. 7j). Each Dirac point is an overlap of two Weyl points with opposite chirality and hence supports double topological surface states connected to the Dirac points. To realize a Dirac metamaterial, a bilayer unit cell composed of eight metallic helices was designed (Fig. 7k). The Dirac point and spin-polarized topological surface states were experimentally demonstrated in the microwave regime157 (Fig. 7l). Topological features, such as nonzero Cspin and topological surface states, have also been observed when the ratio between and is negative158 (η < 0).
The main advantage of topological metamaterials is that they provide flexible and relaxed conditions in design119,153. The topological features of photonic crystals are attributed to Bloch eigenmodes that require translational symmetries. In contrast, topological metamaterials rely on effective medium theory. Although topological metamaterials have been studied under periodic arrangements to calculate the band structure and Chern numbers, translational symmetry is not a necessary condition for effective medium theory. For example, topological features of chiral hyperbolic metamaterials109,117,119,152 and Dirac metamaterials156,157 have also been confirmed by using effective medium theory and retrieved effective parameters without assuming a periodic arrangement. Therefore, topological phases of topological metamaterials are stable under a disordered arrangement or changes in geometrical parameters as long as the effective parameter conditions are satisfied. Topological phases also remain when the effective parameters are perturbed159.
Approaches that use metamaterials have a disadvantage in the deep-subwavelength condition. To support topological phases at a given wavelength, topological metamaterials should be composed of smaller structural units compared to topological photonic crystals. This deep-subwavelength condition may be advantageous in applications such as compact photonic devices, but the design complexity hinders experimental demonstration and practical realization.
Recent progress in topological photonics
In the previous section, we reviewed numerous attempts to realize 3D topological phases in photonic systems using photonic crystals and metamaterials. In this section, we review and discuss recent progress in topological photonics not covered in the previous sections. We start with stacked topological photonic crystals for layer pseudospin, which were proposed very recently. In addition to the approaches for realizing topological systems, other recent studies have been conducted in a broader context. For example, Weyl degeneracies may have dimensions higher than zero, as opposed to the zero dimension of Weyl points. Additionally, a system possessing a 3D gapped topological phase may support gapless 1D edge states instead of gapless 2D surface states. We discuss the cutting edge in topological photonics, especially focusing on six areas: (1) stacked 2D photonic crystals to emulate layer pseudospin, (2) 1D and 2D Weyl degeneracies, (3) unidirectional Maxwellian spin waves, (4) photonic systems with higher-order topological phases, (5) interactions of light with topological phases, and (6) topological photonics oriented to applications.
Stacked topological photonic crystals for layer pseudospin
Recently, layer pseudospin has emerged as a new degree of freedom. The concept of layer pseudospin was originally studied in 2D materials160 and then extended to acoustics161 and photonics. In 2019, two independent research groups162,163 proposed the use of bilayer photonic crystals to introduce layer pseudospin.
One group used dielectric slabs with triangle-shaped air holes arranged in a hexagonal pattern163. The layer pseudospin mechanism (Fig. 8a) entails the dispersion of the single slabs, each of which has a Dirac cone. When the separation between two layers is large enough that interlayer coupling is negligible, the dispersion of the bilayer forms doubly degenerate Dirac cones. If interlayer coupling is introduced between two equivalent layers, then the degeneracy is lifted, and the two Dirac cones move oppositely along the frequency axis. The dispersion can be further engineered by using layers with different geometries. When the mirror symmetry is broken while preserving , the bands are gapped, and two double degeneracies form in the K valley: one above the band gap and one below it. In such cases, fields are localized with counterpropagating power flux in each layer, analogous to spin-orbit coupling in electronics. On the other hand, under a perturbation that lacks and preserves mirror symmetry, the bands are gapped but have no degeneracy. Now, the eigenmodes are mixed between two layers that have the same rotation direction of the power flux. These two topological phases are called “layer-polarized” and “layer-mixed” by the authors. Perturbations that simultaneously break mirror symmetry and lead to either layer-polarized or layer-mixed topological phases, depending on the relative strengths of the two symmetry breakings.
These two phases were also realized by stacking three layers of patterned metal plates (Fig. 8b)162. The first and third layers have slots shaped like ceiling fans, and a topological phase transition occurs by rotating the patterns of the layers. The layer-polarized topological states support two edge states, each localized in each layer, but with opposite group velocities (Fig. 8c, left). This layer-momentum locking shows that the layer pseudospin can be exploited to control edge transport as spin and valley do. However, considering that the edge states localized in two layers can be easily flipped, the layer-polarized phase cannot provide unidirectional propagation. In contrast, in the layer-mixed topological case, the two edge states have the same group velocity sign, positive in the K valley and negative in the K′ valley (Fig. 8c, right); this arrangement is equivalent to the quantum valley Hall effect. Therefore, the edge states can robustly propagate in the presence of defects as long as intervalley scattering is absent. Edge transport was experimentally demonstrated in the microwave regime by using samples fabricated by circuit-board printing (Fig. 8d)162. In these experiments, layer-polarized edge states between media possessing layer-polarized and layer-mixed phases were also observed, suggesting potential in a layer-selected topological delay line.
Recently, photonic crystals composed of two complementary layers were proposed to emulate quantum spin Hall phases. If two complementary layers are placed close to each other, then the interlayer coupling introduces bianisotropy and lifts the Dirac cones (Fig. 8e). Layer pseudospin was recently demonstrated using bilayer photonic crystals composed of a metallic hexagonal patch and its complementary image (Fig. 8f)164. Because of the high symmetry, each layer possesses a gapless Dirac dispersion, where the TE and TM modes are degenerate. The two modes are flipped in the complementary layer due to the electromagnetic duality. When the layers are close enough such that interlayer coupling is involved, a band gap appears (Fig. 8g). The bilayer photonic crystals host spin-degenerate states with nonzero Cspin, similar to bianisotropic metamaterials164. At the interfaces between bilayer photonic crystals with opposite signs of bianisotropy, topological edge states immune from back-scattering were demonstrated in the microwave range (Fig. 8h)164.
Weyl degeneracies with nonzero dimensions
3D gapless topological phase can possess not only Weyl points but also topological degeneracies that have nonzero dimensions in 3D momentum space. Weyl degeneracies include Weyl nodal lines and Weyl nodal surfaces (Fig. 9a, b). Weyl nodal lines are 1D line degeneracies that can manifest as rings, chains, links, and knots in 3D momentum space165. A nodal ring is an ordinary closed loop, while a nodal chain is composed of several nodal rings touching each other. A nodal link and a nodal knot involve links; several nodal rings linked together form a nodal link, and a nodal ring linked with itself is a nodal knot166. Photonic nodal rings have been demonstrated using double gyroid photonic crystals108,114, a face-centered cubic lattice of a dielectric sphere167, and 2D photonic crystal lattices composed of two distinct dielectric cylinders168. Experimental observation of a nodal line has been reported using a photonic crystal with and two glide symmetries169. Although a nodal ring contains topological features, such as a nonzero Berry phase threading the ring, it is not topologically charged and can be split into two Weyl points by breaking . Nodal chains composed of touching nodal rings, as another type of nodal line, have been experimentally observed in a metallic-mesh photonic crystal (Fig. 9c, d)170. However, the nodal lines rely on accidental degeneracies and are therefore prone to be broken or removed by perturbations that even preserve such symmetries as structural variation. In contrast, a nodal line that arises from an hourglass-shaped dispersion of four bands is robust against perturbations that preserve the symmetries171,172. An hourglass nodal line was experimentally observed in a photonic crystal possessing three glide mirror symmetries and C4 symmetry (Fig. 9e, f)173. Recently, nodal links were observed in a biaxial hyperbolic metamaterial174.
In contrast to the increasing interest in Weyl nodal lines, studies on Weyl nodal surfaces (Fig. 9b) are scarce in photonics. Nodal surfaces carrying topological charge have been presented in condensed matter physics175–177 and acoustics178,179, including a recent experimental demonstration. Theoretical predictions suggest that nonsymmorphic symmetries and ensure nodal surfaces at the BZ boundary180. Weyl nodal surfaces have been numerically demonstrated in photonics using a topological metamaterial possessing such symmetries153.
Unidirectional Maxwellian spin waves
Recently, a new phase of matter called a Maxwellian phase was theoretically predicted (Fig. 10a)51,181–183. Atomic-scale media can host photonic edge waves analogous to the electronic edge states in condensed matter systems. In the (2 + 1)-dimension, photonic edge waves arise specifically from the Hall viscosity184, which is a unique spatially dispersive form of the Hall conductivity. Such edge waves can occur at the interface of a viscous Hall medium and any arbitrary medium, even vacuum (Fig. 10b). These topological waves completely vanish on the edge due to the Hall viscosity and have a biexponential decay away from the interface. The dispersion relation of the bulk and edge shows that a unidirectional Maxwellian spin wave closes the bulk band gap (Fig. 10c)51,181–183. The defining property of such an edge wave is helicity quantization, in contrast to conventional classical surface waves, in which the helicity is a classical continuous variable. The theoretical approach known as the Dirac–Maxwell correspondence compares the spin-1 vector fields of light with the spin-1/2 spinor fields in Dirac’s equation185,186. Gyrotropy, which is the high-frequency equivalence of the DC Hall coefficient, has been rigorously shown to behave as a mass term for photons51,181–183. Therefore, an interface between a positive gyrotropy and a negative gyrotropy can host special spin waves that are unidirectional (Fig. 10d). These waves are photonic analogs of Jackiw–Rebbi waves, which are solutions of the Dirac equation for an interface between a positive mass and a negative mass. These are fundamentally different from the surface plasmon polaritons or magnetic edge plasmons that exist on the interface between media with opposite signs of dielectric constant45. The photonic Jackiw–Rebbi waves exponentially decay on both sides of the interface (Fig. 10e). Here, the field has a maximum at the interface and does not vanish like in a viscous Hall medium. Figure 10f shows the dispersion of these photonic Jackiw–Rebbi waves.
Higher-order photonic topological phase
The topological insulating phases that we have reviewed thus far have an insulating bulk with gapless boundary modes, which are one dimension lower than the bulk. In other words, a d-dimensional topological system possesses (d − 1)-dimensional boundary states187. It has recently been revealed that there exists a new type of topological phase called a higher-order topological phase that does not obey the traditional bulk-boundary correspondence. Here, topologically nontrivial boundary modes are more than one dimension lower than the bulk. A d-dimensional n-th order topological insulator has (d − 1)−, (d − 2)−, …, (d − n + 1)-dimensional gapped boundaries, which can be viewed as topological insulators possessing (d − n)-dimensional gapless boundary states188. Examples of such higher-order topological phases include 2D systems with topological corner modes and 3D systems with topological hinge or corner modes (Fig. 11a). Higher-order topological insulators189–192 and semimetals193,194, which can be obtained by stacking and introducing appropriate interlayer coupling, have been reported in condensed matter physics.
Higher-order topological insulating phases were soon extended to photonics. In 2018, a second-order photonic topological phase was demonstrated using hexagonally arranged evanescently coupled waveguides195. The bulk dispersion of the hexagonal lattice was engineered to possess mid-gap edge states by viewing it as a triangular lattice with six hexagonal clusters and arranging them (Fig. 11b)53. Whereas a similar structure has been known to support an ordinary first-order topological phase, the mid-gap leads to the existence of topological corner modes (Fig. 11c). 0D modes confined to the corners of the array were observed by measuring the intensity of a diffracted beam at the output interfaces (Fig. 11d). Motivated by the topological corner modes in the breathing kagome lattice in condensed matter physics193,196, a similar observation in the visible wavelength regime was conducted using straight waveguides arranged in a breathing kagome lattice197. Observation of the second-order photonic topological phase in this breathing kagome waveguide requires a simplified setup that does not require additional waveguides to excite the zero-energy modes. Recently, topological corner modes that originate from long-range interactions beyond nearest-neighbor coupling were observed in a kagome lattice198. The long-range interactions were achieved by far-field radiative coupling induced by the transverse mode.
Silicon ring resonators, which have been used to achieve 2D photonic topological phases via asymmetric phases, can also be made to host a second-order photonic topological phase by using a different coupling configuration (Fig. 11e)199. The coupling strength and its sign were determined by vertically shifting the links between ring resonators. The ring resonator array has a nonzero quadrupole moment that originates from the negative coupling and the resultant synthetic gauge field. The negative coupling gives rise to topological corner modes in the band gap (Fig. 11f, g).
On the other hand, 2D topological systems with second-order topological phases that do not involve negative coupling also exist. The 2D Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) model has been proposed to host topological corner modes without requiring negative coupling or a synthetic gauge field200. The SSH model201, originally defined in 1D, is a dimerized chain, the band topology of which is characterized by the Zak phase. The 1D SSH model is trivial if the intracellular coupling is stronger than the intercellular coupling and nontrivial otherwise. This feature can be straightforwardly generalized to 2D by expanding or shrinking four clusters in a rectangular lattice82. When the topologically nontrivial 2D SSH model is enclosed by the trivial 2D model (Fig. 11h), the system supports not only topological edge states but also corner states confined at the corners of the domain boundaries (Fig. 11i)200. The corner modes were experimentally observed in the microwave regime by scanning dielectric cylinders arranged in the 2D SSH model (Fig. 11j)202,203. Polarization-dependent switching of the topological corner modes was suggested by using plasmonic particles in a 2D SSH lattice under open boundaries204. A second-order topological phase in the 2D SSH model was also examined in a microwave circuit205. The topological phases in the 2D SSH model are protected by a nontrivial Zak phase, but the quadrupole bulk moment of the model is zero. A 2D SSH model with a nonzero quadrupole moment was recently proposed by breaking by means of gyromagnetic materials206.
These higher-order photonic topological features have also been found in non-Hermitian systems that can be realized with optical resonators or cold atomic gases207,208. Corner modes with topological protection provide a new route to robustly confine light in extremely small mode volumes. This may enable many potential applications such as nanocavities with a high quality factor209, low-threshold lasers, and a platform to enhance nonlinearity. To facilitate application in integrated photonics, surface-wave photonic crystals with a broad band gap and topological corner modes were proposed210.
Interactions between light and topological phases
To date, a variety of approaches to realize photonic topological systems have been reviewed. In this section, we slightly shift our focus and discuss the interplay between light and topological matter. The research discussed here puts more emphasis on determining how photonic topological phases modify previously reported phenomena. The behavior of Weyl particles at the interfaces of two Weyl semimetals has been explored, with a special focus on their valley-dependent transverse shift211–213 and scattering214. Similarly, the interaction between electromagnetic waves and Weyl media has been studied. At the interface of a Weyl medium and an insulator, a reflected beam undergoes an anomalous shift that maps a half-vortex in momentum space influenced by the topological surface states215. The phase vortex of the reflected beam was experimentally verified by using a photonic crystal possessing synthetic Weyl points and a Fabry–Perot interference setup (Fig. 12a–c)216. This work suggests a way to detect the topology of Weyl media by measuring beam trajectories.
Furthermore, nontrivial band topology can be used to enhance optical phenomena. It has been demonstrated that the photonic spin Hall effect can be enhanced by the topological edge states of a zigzag array of dielectric particles217. More directly, the nonzero Berry curvature near the Weyl points can improve the photonic spin Hall effect. Serving as sources and sinks of the Berry curvature, Weyl points can drastically increase phenomena related to the Berry curvature. Theoretical analysis using a spatially varying waveguide array that supports synthetic Weyl points (Fig. 12d, e) predicted that wave packets propagating near the Weyl points exhibit an enhanced photonic spin Hall effect. Anomalous propagation, called helical Zitterbewegung motion, was also numerically observed along helical trajectories (Fig. 12f)218.
The peculiar behavior of photons near a Weyl point also alters the light–matter interactions at both the classical and quantum levels. The conical dispersion at the Weyl frequency decouples the scattering cross-section and wavelength and enables resonant scattering at a desired wavelength219. It has been reported that quantum vacuum fluctuations can be engineered by the topology of photonic bands220. When a quantum emitter is coupled to a Weyl point at a frequency that matches the transition of the emitter, fractional decay is predicted even when the density states are smooth221. Furthermore, the interaction of topological nontrivial systems with nonlinearity has emerged as an interesting field. Topological edge states can be used to increase nonlinear responses such as parametric amplification220, optical isolation222, Kerr nonlinearity223, harmonic generation enhancement223,224, and control225.
Topological photonics towards applications
The virtue of topological photonics becomes clearer when we examine applications. The absence of back-scattering modes opens a new route for the implementation of topological photonics in real-world applications. In particular, topological photonics enables dissipation-less transport and thus efficient photonic devices for optical communication. This trait is in contrast to applications based on trivial systems because the energy losses in such systems are strongly affected by device conditions such as defects. Furthermore, whereas topologically protected transport in electronics requires a low temperature, that in photonics operates at room temperature and can be implemented in practical platforms.
Some work has been devoted to developing applications by increasing the practicability of photonic topological systems. Recently, a photonic crystal that supports the quantum valley Hall effect in the terahertz regime was used to transport uncompressed video226. The topological boundary modes of the photonic crystal transmitted dynamic signals at high rates, even under a perturbed domain wall. The mass data transfer with robust features proved that photonic topological systems can serve as compact and efficient on-chip devices for communications and data processing. Another paper proposed ultrathin topological photonic crystals that have electrical shielding and can be readily integrated into conventional optical platforms227.
For practical applications, a device should give more than one fixed response. Therefore, reconfigurable topological systems that support topological phase transitions that can be manipulated are essential. Dynamic control of topological phase transitions has been achieved using liquid crystals228, a phase-change material under temperature variation229,230 and transparent conducting oxides under optical pumping231. A reconfigurable photonic topological system that supports selective propagation of topological edge modes under mechanical modulation was demonstrated using a bianisotropic photonic crystal150. A topological photonic crystal composed of a patterned silicon slab also exhibited tuning of the transmission spectrum under optical pumping232.
Some researchers have focused on the practical issues that arise while implementing topological photonics in applications. For example, topological boundary modes should be well coupled with input and outgoing waves. Broadband rerouting of topological edge states excited by propagating plane waves and then released to free space via leaky-wave radiation has been numerically studied by using a magnetized plasma with a patterned plasmonic coating233. Whereas a topological system assumes infinitely periodic structures, realistic devices should have finite dimensions. Therefore, studies on these practical limitations, such as the size effect, have been conducted using polariton topological insulators234.
Following the currently growing interest in machine learning technology, the design of topological systems by machine learning has been suggested235–240. A design methodology, which was originally based on researchers’ intuition and trial-and-error, was developed by training neural networks to estimate topological invariants or find topological band gaps.
Conclusion and outlook
Despite its short history, topological photonics has been developed surprisingly rapidly. Great success has been achieved in both emulating topological phenomena in photonic systems and finding new exotic features that have no electronic counterpart. The combination of topology and photonics is beneficial for both fields; photonics serves as a tool by which theoretical predictions of topological phenomena can be tested, which has led to the rapid development of topological phases of matter. Topology has also contributed to the growth of photonics by enabling its robust control, even through imperfect devices, and by promoting its implementation in practical applications. The advances in topological photonics have enabled a variety of fascinating phenomena that have not been realized using conventional photonics.
Topological photonics will continue to evolve in the following years, as in the past decade. Classification of the topological phases by their symmetries can provide helpful guidelines for systematically understanding the phases97,241–244. Additionally, the scope of the topological phases is becoming diverse, covering nonlinearity220–225, non-Hermiticity245–249, and dimensions higher than three250,251. The scope of topological photonics can be further expanded by combining multidimensional synthetic space and interdimensional mapping252 and by including the terms that have been generally ignored, for example, strong coupling of photons253–256. Along with previous research on realizing and demonstrating photonic topological systems, studies of how they interact with classical and/or quantum objects and how they alter or enhance the previously reported phenomena may provide surprising insights. In addition to fundamental studies to understand the origin of topology and attempts to realize topological features in many different physical systems, topological photonics has bright prospects in applications, especially when combined with other techniques and interdisciplinary fields.
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) grants (NRF-2019R1A2C3003129, CAMM-2019M3A6B3030637, NRF-2019R1A5A8080290, NRF-2018M3D1A1058997) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) of the Korean government. M.K. acknowledges the Global Ph.D. fellowship (NRF-2017H1A2A1043204) funded by the Ministry of Education of the Korean government.
Author contributions
J.R. conceived the idea and initiated the project. M.K. and J.R. mainly wrote the manuscript and produced the figures. Z.J. provided the advices and partially involved writing the manuscript. All authors participated in the discussion and confirmed the final manuscript. J.R. guided all aspects of the work.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Thouless DJ, et al. Quantized hall conductance in a two-dimensional periodic potential. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1982;49:405–408. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Klitzing KV, Dorda G, Pepper M. New method for high-accuracy determination of the fine-structure constant based on quantized hall resistance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1980;45:494–497. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. Course of Theoretical Physics Vol 5. (USSR Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 1980).
- 4.Hasan MZ, Kane CL. Colloquium: topological insulators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2010;82:3045–3067. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liu YZ, Chen XB, Xu Y. Topological phononics: from fundamental models to real materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020;30:1904784. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Huber SD. Topological mechanics. Nat. Phys. 2016;12:621–623. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cooper NR, Dalibard J, Spielman IB. Topological bands for ultracold atoms. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2019;91:015005. doi: 10.1103/revmodphys.91.015005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Khanikaev AB, et al. Photonic topological insulators. Nat. Mater. 2013;12:233–239. doi: 10.1038/nmat3520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bliokh KY, Smirnova D, Nori F. Quantum spin Hall effect of light. Science. 2015;348:1448–1451. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa9519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lu L, Joannopoulos JD, Soljačić M. Topological photonics. Nat. Photonics. 2014;8:821–829. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Xie BY, et al. Photonics meets topology. Opt. Express. 2018;26:24531–24550. doi: 10.1364/OE.26.024531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Khanikaev AB, Shvets G. Two-dimensional topological photonics. Nat. Photonics. 2017;11:763–773. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ozawa T, et al. Topological photonics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2019;91:015006. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yuan LQ, et al. Synthetic dimension in photonics. Optica. 2018;5:1396–1405. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rider MS, et al. A perspective on topological nanophotonics: current status and future challenges. J. Appl. Phys. 2019;125:120901. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sun XC, et al. Two-dimensional topological photonic systems. Prog. Quantum Electron. 2017;55:52–73. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ota Y, et al. Active topological photonics. Nanophotonics. 2020;9:547–567. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Smirnova, D. et al. Nonlinear topological photonics. Appl. Phys. Rev. 7, 021306 (2020).
- 19.Liu CX, Zhang SC, Qi XL. The quantum anomalous hall effect: theory and experiment. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 2016;7:301–321. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Weng HM, et al. Quantum anomalous Hall effect and related topological electronic states. Adv. Phys. 2015;64:227–282. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Berestetskii, V. B., Lifshitz, E. M. & Pitaevskii, L. P. Quantum Electrodynamics. 2nd edn. (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1982).
- 22.Martin, G. E. Transformation Geometry: An Introduction to Symmetry. (New York: Springer, 1982).
- 23.Heaviside OXI. On the forces, stresses, and fluxes of energy in the electromagnetic field. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A. 1892;183:423–480. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bouchaud JP, Zérah PG. Spontaneous resonances and universal behavior in ferrimagnets: effective-medium theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1989;63:1000–1003. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.1000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Asadchy V, Díaz-Rubio A, Tretyakov SA. Bianisotropic metasurfaces: physics and applications. Nanophotonics. 2018;7:1069–1094. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lekner J. Optical properties of isotropic chiral media. Pure Appl. Opt. 1996;5:417–443. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Poddubny A, et al. Hyperbolic metamaterials. Nat. Photonics. 2013;7:948–957. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Simovski CR, Belov PA. Low-frequency spatial dispersion in wire media. Phys. Rev. E. 2004;70:046616. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.046616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Rayleigh L. XXVI. On the remarkable phenomenon of crystalline reflexion described by Prof. Stokes. Lond. Edinb. Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 1888;26:256–265. [Google Scholar]
- 30.John S. Strong localization of photons in certain disordered dielectric superlattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1987;58:2486–2489. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.2486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yablonovitch E. Inhibited spontaneous emission in solid-state physics and electronics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1987;58:2059–2062. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.2059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Joannopoulos, J. D., Meade, R. D. & Winn, J. N. Photonic Crystals: Molding the Flow of Light. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1995).
- 33.Kane, C. L. Topological band theory and the invariant. Contemp. Concepts Condens. Matter Sci.6, 3–34 (2013).
- 34.Jackiw R, Rebbi C. Solitons with fermion number 1/2. Phys. Rev. D. 1976;13:3398–3409. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hatsugai Y. Chern number and edge states in the integer quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1993;71:3697–3700. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.3697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kohmoto M. Topological invariant and the quantization of the Hall conductance. Ann. Phys. 1985;160:343–354. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Berry MV. Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changes. Proc. R. Soc. A. 1984;392:45–57. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Haldane FDM, Raghu S. Possible realization of directional optical waveguides in photonic crystals with broken time-reversal symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008;100:013904. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.013904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Raghu S, Haldane FDM. Analogs of quantum-Hall-effect edge states in photonic crystals. Phys. Rev. A. 2008;78:033834. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wang Z, et al. Reflection-free one-way edge modes in a gyromagnetic photonic crystal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008;100:013905. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.013905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wang Z, et al. Observation of unidirectional backscattering-immune topological electromagnetic states. Nature. 2009;461:772–775. doi: 10.1038/nature08293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Rechtsman MC, et al. Photonic Floquet topological insulators. Nature. 2013;496:196–200. doi: 10.1038/nature12066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Fang KJ, Yu ZF, Fan SH. Realizing effective magnetic field for photons by controlling the phase of dynamic modulation. Nat. Photonics. 2012;6:782–787. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Jin DF, et al. Topological magnetoplasmon. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:13486. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Jin DF, et al. Infrared topological plasmons in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017;118:245301. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.245301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kramers HA. Théorie générale de la rotation paramagnétique dans les cristaux. Proc. R. Neth. Acad. Arts Sci. 1930;33:959–972. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Van Mechelen T, Jacob Z. Universal spin-momentum locking of evanescent waves. Optica. 2016;3:118–126. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kalhor F, Thundat T, Jacob Z. Universal spin-momentum locked optical forces. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016;108:061102. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kane CL, Mele EJ. Z2 topological order and the quantum spin hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005;95:146802. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.146802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Roy R. Z2 classification of quantum spin Hall systems: an approach using time-reversal invariance. Phys. Rev. B. 2009;79:195321. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Van Mechelen T, Jacob Z. Photonic Dirac monopoles and skyrmions: spin-1 quantization [Invited] Opt. Mater. Express. 2019;9:95–111. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Piao XJ, Yu S, Park N. Design of transverse spinning of light with globally unique handedness. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018;120:203901. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.203901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wu LH, Hu X. Scheme for achieving a topological photonic crystal by using dielectric material. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015;114:223901. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.223901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hafezi M, et al. Imaging topological edge states in silicon photonics. Nat. Photonics. 2013;7:1001–1005. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Mittal S, et al. Photonic anomalous quantum hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019;123:043201. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.043201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Barik S, et al. A topological quantum optics interface. Science. 2018;359:666–668. doi: 10.1126/science.aaq0327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Jalali Mehrabad M, et al. A semiconductor topological photonic ring resonator. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2020;116:061102. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Saba M, Wong S, Elman M, Oh SS, Hess O. Nature of topological protection in photonic spin and valley Hall insulators. Phys. Rev. B. 2020;101:054307. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ma T, Shvets G. All-Si valley-Hall photonic topological insulator. New J. Phys. 2016;18:025012. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wu XX, et al. Direct observation of valley-polarized topological edge states in designer surface plasmon crystals. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:1304. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01515-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Gao Z, et al. Valley surface-wave photonic crystal and its bulk/edge transport. Phys. Rev. B. 2017;96:201402. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Wong S, et al. Gapless unidirectional photonic transport using all-dielectric kagome lattices. Phys. Rev. Res. 2020;2:012011. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Noh J, et al. Observation of photonic topological valley hall edge states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018;120:063902. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.063902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.He XT, et al. A silicon-on-insulator slab for topological valley transport. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:872. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08881-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Shalaev MI, et al. Robust topologically protected transport in photonic crystals at telecommunication wavelengths. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2019;14:31–34. doi: 10.1038/s41565-018-0297-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Chen QL, et al. Valley-hall photonic topological insulators with dual-band kink states. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019;7:1900036. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Zeng YQ, et al. Electrically pumped topological laser with valley edge modes. Nature. 2020;578:246–250. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-1981-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Dong JW, et al. Valley photonic crystals for control of spin and topology. Nat. Mater. 2017;16:298–302. doi: 10.1038/nmat4807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Xue, H. R. et al. Spin-valley-controlled photonic topological insulator. Preprint at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.00393 (2018).
- 70.Floquet G. Sur les équations différentielles linéaires à coefficients périodiques. Annales scientifiques de. l’École Norm. Supérieure. 1883;12:47–88. [Google Scholar]
- 71.Kittle, C. Introduction to Solid State Physics. 5th edn. (Wiley, New York, 1976).
- 72.Noether E. Invariant variation problems. Transp. Theory Stat. Phys. 1971;1:186–207. [Google Scholar]
- 73.Kitagawa T, et al. Topological characterization of periodically driven quantum systems. Phys. Rev. B. 2010;82:235114. [Google Scholar]
- 74.Lindner NH, Refael G, Galitski V. Floquet topological insulator in semiconductor quantum wells. Nat. Phys. 2011;7:490–495. [Google Scholar]
- 75.Gu ZH, et al. Floquet spectrum and transport through an irradiated graphene ribbon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011;107:216601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.216601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Oka T, Aoki H. Photovoltaic Hall effect in graphene. Phys. Rev. B. 2009;79:081406. [Google Scholar]
- 77.Lin Q, et al. Photonic Weyl point in a two-dimensional resonator lattice with a synthetic frequency dimension. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:13731. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Lin Q, et al. A three-dimensional photonic topological insulator using a two-dimensional ring resonator lattice with a synthetic frequency dimension. Sci. Adv. 2018;4:eaat2774. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aat2774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Maczewsky LJ, et al. Observation of photonic anomalous Floquet topological insulators. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:13756. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Mukherjee S, et al. Experimental observation of anomalous topological edge modes in a slowly driven photonic lattice. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:13918. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Zak J. Berry’s phase for energy bands in solids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1989;62:2747–2750. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.2747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Liu F, Wakabayashi K. Novel topological phase with a zero berry curvature. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017;118:076803. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.076803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Fu L, Kane CL, Mele EJ. Topological insulators in three dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007;98:106803. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.106803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Moore JE, Balents L. Topological invariants of time-reversal-invariant band structures. Phys. Rev. B. 2007;75:121306. [Google Scholar]
- 85.Roy R. Topological phases and the quantum spin Hall effect in three dimensions. Phys. Rev. B. 2009;79:195322. [Google Scholar]
- 86.Yang YH, et al. Realization of a three-dimensional photonic topological insulator. Nature. 2019;565:622–626. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0829-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Nakahara, M. Geometry, Topology and Physics. 2nd edn. (CRC Press, Bristol, 2003).
- 88.Zhang SC, Hu JP. A four-dimensional generalization of the quantum hall effect. Science. 2001;294:823–828. doi: 10.1126/science.294.5543.823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Halperin BI. Possible states for a three-dimensional electron gas in a strong magnetic field. Jpn J. Appl. Phys. 1987;26:1913. [Google Scholar]
- 90.Kohmoto M, Halperin BI, Wu YS. Diophantine equation for the three-dimensional quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. B. 1992;45:13488–13493. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.45.13488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.De Blas AZE, Axel F. Diophantine equation for the 3D transport coefficients of Bloch electrons in a strong tilted magnetic field with quantum Hall effect. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2004;16:7673–7708. [Google Scholar]
- 92.Störmer HL, et al. Quantization of the Hall effect in an anisotropic three-dimensional electronic system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1986;56:85–88. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Tang FD, et al. Three-dimensional quantum Hall effect and metal–insulator transition in ZrTe5. Nature. 2019;569:537–541. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1180-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Lu L, et al. Symmetry-protected topological photonic crystal in three dimensions. Nat. Phys. 2016;12:337–340. [Google Scholar]
- 95.Xia Y, et al. Observation of a large-gap topological-insulator class with a single Dirac cone on the surface. Nat. Phys. 2009;5:398–402. [Google Scholar]
- 96.Zhang HJ, et al. Topological insulators in Bi2Se3, Bi2Te3 and Sb2Te3 with a single Dirac cone on the surface. Nat. Phys. 2009;5:438–442. [Google Scholar]
- 97.Yannopapas V. Gapless surface states in a lattice of coupled cavities: a photonic analog of topological crystalline insulators. Phys. Rev. B. 2011;84:195126. [Google Scholar]
- 98.Fu L. Topological crystalline insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011;106:106802. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.106802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Slobozhanyuk A, et al. Three-dimensional all-dielectric photonic topological insulator. Nat. Photonics. 2017;11:130–136. [Google Scholar]
- 100.Ochiai T. Gapless surface states originating from accidentally degenerate quadratic band touching in a three-dimensional tetragonal photonic crystal. Phys. Rev. A. 2017;96:043842. [Google Scholar]
- 101.Wan XG, et al. Topological semimetal and Fermi-arc surface states in the electronic structure of pyrochlore iridates. Phys. Rev. B. 2011;83:205101. [Google Scholar]
- 102.Burkov AA, Balents L. Weyl semimetal in a topological insulator multilayer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011;107:127205. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.127205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Xu SY, et al. Discovery of a Weyl fermion semimetal and topological Fermi arcs. Science. 2015;349:613–617. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa9297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Lv BQ, et al. Experimental discovery of Weyl semimetal TaAs. Phys. Rev. X. 2015;5:031013. [Google Scholar]
- 105.Yang KY, Lu YM, Ran Y. Quantum Hall effects in a Weyl semimetal: possible application in pyrochlore iridates. Phys. Rev. B. 2011;84:075129. [Google Scholar]
- 106.Soluyanov AA, et al. Type-II Weyl semimetals. Nature. 2015;527:495–498. doi: 10.1038/nature15768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Weyl, H. Gravitation and the electron, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA15, 323 (1929). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 108.Lu, L. et al. Weyl points and line nodes in gyroid photonic crystals. Nat. Photonics7, 294–299 (2013).
- 109.Yang, B. et al. Direct observation of topological surface-state arcs in photonic metamaterials. Nat. Commun.8, 97 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 110.Wang DY, et al. Photonic Weyl points due to broken time-reversal symmetry in magnetized semiconductor. Nat. Phys. 2019;15:1150–1155. [Google Scholar]
- 111.Gao WL, et al. Photonic Weyl degeneracies in magnetized plasma. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:12435. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Yang ZJ, et al. Weyl points in a magnetic tetrahedral photonic crystal. Opt. Express. 2017;25:15772–15777. doi: 10.1364/OE.25.015772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Chen WJ, Xiao M, Chan CT. Photonic crystals possessing multiple Weyl points and the experimental observation of robust surface states. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:13038. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Lu L, et al. Experimental observation of Weyl points. Science. 2015;349:622–624. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa9273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Yang B, et al. Ideal Weyl points and helicoid surface states in artificial photonic crystal structures. Science. 2018;359:1013–1016. doi: 10.1126/science.aaq1221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Noh J, et al. Experimental observation of optical Weyl points and Fermi arc-like surface states. Nat. Phys. 2017;13:611–617. [Google Scholar]
- 117.Xiao M, Lin Q, Fan SH. Hyperbolic Weyl point in reciprocal chiral metamaterials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016;117:057401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.057401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Jia HW, et al. Observation of chiral zero mode in inhomogeneous three-dimensional Weyl metamaterials. Science. 2019;363:148–151. doi: 10.1126/science.aau7707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Kim M, et al. Extremely broadband topological surface states in a photonic topological metamaterial. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019;7:1900900. [Google Scholar]
- 120.Potter AC, Kimchi I, Vishwanath A. Quantum oscillations from surface Fermi arcs in Weyl and Dirac semimetals. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:5161. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Nielsen HB, Ninomiya M. The Adler-Bell-Jackiw anomaly and Weyl fermions in a crystal. Phys. Lett. B. 1983;130:389–396. [Google Scholar]
- 122.Mansha S, Chong YD. Robust edge states in amorphous gyromagnetic photonic lattices. Phys. Rev. B. 2017;96:121405. [Google Scholar]
- 123.Skirlo SA, Lu L, Soljačić M. Multimode one-way waveguides of large chern numbers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014;113:113904. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.113904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Liu, G. G. et al. Observation of an unpaired photonic Dirac point. Nat. Commun. 11, 1873 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 125.Fu JX, Liu RJ, Li ZY. Experimental demonstration of tunable gyromagnetic photonic crystals controlled by dc magnetic fields. EPL. 2010;89:64003. [Google Scholar]
- 126.Poo Y, et al. Experimental realization of self-guiding unidirectional electromagnetic edge states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011;106:093903. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.093903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Skirlo SA, et al. Experimental observation of large chern numbers in photonic crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015;115:253901. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.253901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Fu JX, Liu RJ, Li ZY. Robust one-way modes in gyromagnetic photonic crystal waveguides with different interfaces. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010;97:041112. [Google Scholar]
- 129.Gangaraj SAH, Hanson GW. Topologically protected unidirectional surface states in biased ferrites: duality and application to directional couplers. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2017;16:449–452. [Google Scholar]
- 130.Tan W, et al. Photonic simulation of topological superconductor edge state and zero-energy mode at a vortex. Sci. Rep. 2015;4:7381. doi: 10.1038/srep07381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Gooth J, et al. Experimental signatures of the mixed axial–gravitational anomaly in the Weyl semimetal NbP. Nature. 2017;547:324–327. doi: 10.1038/nature23005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Kharzeev DE, et al. Giant photocurrent in asymmetric Weyl semimetals from the helical magnetic effect. Phys. Rev. B. 2018;98:014305. [Google Scholar]
- 133.O’Brien TE, Diez M, Beenakker CWJ. Magnetic breakdown and klein tunneling in a type-II Weyl semimetal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016;116:236401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.236401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Ochiai T. Floquet–Weyl and Floquet-topological-insulator phases in a stacked two-dimensional ring-network lattice. J. Phys. 2016;28:425501. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/28/42/425501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Wang HL, Zhou LW, Chong YD. Floquet Weyl phases in a three-dimensional network model. Phys. Rev. B. 2016;93:144114. [Google Scholar]
- 136.Zhang Y, Zhu YY. Generation of Weyl points in coupled optical microdisk-resonator arrays via external modulation. Phys. Rev. A. 2017;96:013811. [Google Scholar]
- 137.Bravo-Abad J, et al. Weyl points in photonic-crystal superlattices. 2D Mater. 2015;2:034013. [Google Scholar]
- 138.Wang LY, Jian SK, Yao H. Topological photonic crystal with equifrequency Weyl points. Phys. Rev. A. 2016;93:061801. [Google Scholar]
- 139.Goi E, et al. Observation of type I photonic Weyl points in optical frequencies. Laser Photonics Rev. 2018;12:1700271. [Google Scholar]
- 140.Chang ML, et al. Multiple Weyl points and the sign change of their topological charges in woodpile photonic crystals. Phys. Rev. B. 2017;95:125136. [Google Scholar]
- 141.Wang HX, et al. Three-dimensional photonic Dirac points stabilized by point group symmetry. Phys. Rev. B. 2016;93:235155. [Google Scholar]
- 142.Wang HX, et al. Type-II Dirac photons. npj Quantum Mater. 2017;2:54. [Google Scholar]
- 143.Sakoda K. Dirac cone in two- and three-dimensional metamaterials. Opt. Express. 2012;20:3898–3917. doi: 10.1364/OE.20.003898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Armitage NP, Mele EJ, Vishwanath A. Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2018;90:015001. [Google Scholar]
- 145.Fang C, et al. Topological semimetals with helicoid surface states. Nat. Phys. 2016;12:936–941. [Google Scholar]
- 146.Slobozhanyuk AP, et al. Experimental demonstration of topological effects in bianisotropic metamaterials. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:22270. doi: 10.1038/srep22270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Ma T, et al. Guiding electromagnetic waves around sharp corners: topologically protected photonic transport in metawaveguides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015;114:127401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.127401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Xiao B, et al. Exciting reflectionless unidirectional edge modes in a reciprocal photonic topological insulator medium. Phys. Rev. B. 2016;94:195427. [Google Scholar]
- 149.Lai K, et al. Experimental realization of a reflections-free compact delay line based on a photonic topological insulator. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:28453. doi: 10.1038/srep28453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Cheng XJ, et al. Robust reconfigurable electromagnetic pathways within a photonic topological insulator. Nat. Mater. 2016;15:542–548. doi: 10.1038/nmat4573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Slobozhanyuk A, et al. Near-field imaging of spin-locked edge states in all-dielectric topological metasurfaces. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2019;114:031103. [Google Scholar]
- 152.Gao WL, et al. Topological photonic phase in chiral hyperbolic metamaterials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015;114:037402. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.037402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Kim M, et al. Topologically nontrivial photonic nodal surface in a photonic metamaterial. Phys. Rev. B. 2019;99:235423. [Google Scholar]
- 154.Chern RL, Yu YZ. Chiral surface waves on hyperbolic-gyromagnetic metamaterials. Opt. Express. 2017;25:11801–11812. doi: 10.1364/OE.25.011801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Shiu, R. C. et al. Photonic Chern insulators made of gyromagnetic hyperbolic metamaterials. Phys. Rev. Mater. 4, 065202 (2020).
- 156.Guo QH, et al. Three dimensional photonic dirac points in metamaterials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017;119:213901. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.213901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Guo QH, et al. Observation of three-dimensional photonic dirac points and spin-polarized surface arcs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019;122:203903. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.203903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Yu YZ, Chern RL. Photonic topological phases in dispersive metamaterials. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:17881. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36170-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Liu CX, et al. Disorder-induced topological state transition in photonic metamaterials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017;119:183901. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.183901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Xu XD, et al. Spin and pseudospins in layered transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Phys. 2014;10:343–350. [Google Scholar]
- 161.Lu JY, et al. Valley topological phases in bilayer sonic crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018;120:116802. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.116802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Wu XX, et al. Interlayer topological transport and devices based on layer pseudospins in photonic valley-hall phases. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019;7:1900872. [Google Scholar]
- 163.Chen XD, He XT, Dong JW. All-dielectric layered photonic topological insulators. Laser Photonics Rev. 2019;13:1900091. [Google Scholar]
- 164.Bisharat DJ, Sievenpiper DF. Electromagnetic-dual metasurfaces for topological states along a 1D interface. Laser Photonics Rev. 2019;13:1900126. [Google Scholar]
- 165.Burkov AA, Hook MD, Balents L. Topological nodal semimetals. Phys. Rev. B. 2011;84:235126. [Google Scholar]
- 166.Bi R, et al. Nodal-knot semimetals. Phys. Rev. B. 2017;96:201305. [Google Scholar]
- 167.Kawakami T, Hu X. Symmetry-guaranteed nodal-line semimetals in an fcc lattice. Phys. Rev. B. 2017;96:235307. [Google Scholar]
- 168.Lin JY, et al. Line nodes, Dirac points, and Lifshitz transition in two-dimensional nonsymmorphic photonic crystals. Phys. Rev. B. 2017;96:075438. [Google Scholar]
- 169.Gao WL, et al. Experimental observation of photonic nodal line degeneracies in metacrystals. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:950. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03407-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Yan QH, et al. Experimental discovery of nodal chains. Nat. Phys. 2018;14:461–464. [Google Scholar]
- 171.Takahashi R, Hirayama M, Murakami S. Spinless hourglass nodal-line semimetals. Phys. Rev. B. 2017;96:155206. [Google Scholar]
- 172.Fu BT, et al. Hourglasslike nodal net semimetal in Ag2BiO3. Phys. Rev. B. 2018;98:075146. [Google Scholar]
- 173.Xia LB, et al. Observation of hourglass nodal lines in photonics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019;122:103903. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.103903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Yang, E. C. et al. Observation of non-Abelian nodal links in photonics. Preprint at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.01345 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 175.Zhong CY, et al. Towards three-dimensional Weyl-surface semimetals in graphene networks. Nanoscale. 2016;8:7232–7239. doi: 10.1039/c6nr00882h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Bzdušek T, Sigrist M. Robust doubly charged nodal lines and nodal surfaces in centrosymmetric systems. Phys. Rev. B. 2017;96:155105. [Google Scholar]
- 177.Türker O, Moroz S. Weyl nodal surfaces. Phys. Rev. B. 2018;97:075120. [Google Scholar]
- 178.Xiao M, et al. Experimental demonstration of acoustic semimetal with topologically charged nodal surface. Sci. Adv. 2020;6:eaav2360. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aav2360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Yang YH, et al. Observation of a topological nodal surface and its surface-state arcs in an artificial acoustic crystal. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:5185. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13258-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.König A, Mermin ND. Electronic level degeneracy in nonsymmorphic periodic or aperiodic crystals. Phys. Rev. B. 1997;56:13607–13610. [Google Scholar]
- 181.Van Mechelen T, Jacob Z. Nonlocal topological electromagnetic phases of matter. Phys. Rev. B. 2019;99:205146. [Google Scholar]
- 182.Van Mechelen T, Jacob Z. Unidirectional Maxwellian spin waves. Nanophotonics. 2019;8:1399–1416. [Google Scholar]
- 183.Van Mechelen T, Jacob Z. Quantum gyroelectric effect: photon spin-1 quantization in continuum topological bosonic phases. Phys. Rev. A. 2018;98:023842. [Google Scholar]
- 184.Berdyugin AI, et al. Measuring Hall viscosity of graphene’s electron fluid. Science. 2019;364:162–165. doi: 10.1126/science.aau0685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Barnett SM. Optical Dirac equation. New J. Phys. 2014;16:093008. [Google Scholar]
- 186.Bialynicki-Birula, I. in Coherence and Quantum Optics VII (eds Eberly, J. H. et al.) 313–322 (Springer, Boston, MA, 1996).
- 187.Hughes TL, Leigh RG, Parrikar O. Torsional anomalies, Hall viscosity, and bulk-boundary correspondence in topological states. Phys. Rev. D. 2013;88:025040. [Google Scholar]
- 188.Parameswaran SA, Wan Y. Topological insulators turn a corner. Physics. 2017;10:132. [Google Scholar]
- 189.Benalcazar WA, Bernevig BA, Hughes TL. Quantized electric multipole insulators. Science. 2017;357:61–66. doi: 10.1126/science.aah6442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Benalcazar WA, Bernevig BA, Hughes TL. Electric multipole moments, topological multipole moment pumping, and chiral hinge states in crystalline insulators. Phys. Rev. B. 2017;96:245115. [Google Scholar]
- 191.Langbehn J, et al. Reflection-symmetric second-order topological insulators and superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017;119:246401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.246401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Song ZD, Fang Z, Fang C. (d-2)-dimensional edge states of rotation symmetry protected topological states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017;119:246402. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.246402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Ezawa M. Higher-order topological insulators and semimetals on the breathing kagome and pyrochlore lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018;120:026801. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.026801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Lin M, Hughes TL. Topological quadrupolar semimetals. Phys. Rev. B. 2018;98:241103. [Google Scholar]
- 195.Noh J, et al. Topological protection of photonic mid-gap defect modes. Nat. Photonics. 2018;12:408–415. [Google Scholar]
- 196.Kunst FK, Van Miert G, Bergholtz EJ. Lattice models with exactly solvable topological hinge and corner states. Phys. Rev. B. 2018;97:241405. [Google Scholar]
- 197.El Hassan A, et al. Corner states of light in photonic waveguides. Nat. Photonics. 2019;13:697–700. [Google Scholar]
- 198.Li MY, et al. Higher-order topological states in photonic kagome crystals with long-range interactions. Nat. Photonics. 2020;14:89–94. [Google Scholar]
- 199.Mittal S, et al. Photonic quadrupole topological phases. Nat. Photonics. 2019;13:692–696. [Google Scholar]
- 200.Xie BY, et al. Second-order photonic topological insulator with corner states. Phys. Rev. B. 2018;98:205147. [Google Scholar]
- 201.Su WP, Schrieffer JR, Heeger AJ. Solitons in polyacetylene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1979;42:1698–1701. [Google Scholar]
- 202.Chen XD, et al. Direct observation of corner states in second-order topological photonic crystal slabs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019;122:233902. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.233902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Xie BY, et al. Visualization of higher-order topological insulating phases in two-dimensional dielectric photonic crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019;122:233903. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.233903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Kim, M. & Rho, J. Topological edge and corner states in a two-dimensional photonic Su-Schrieffer-Heeger lattice. Nanophotonics (2019). 10.1515/nanoph-2019-0451.
- 205.Peterson CW, et al. A quantized microwave quadrupole insulator with topologically protected corner states. Nature. 2018;555:346–350. doi: 10.1038/nature25777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.He, L. et al. Quadrupole topological photonic crystals. Nat. Commun. 11, 3119 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 207.Liu T, et al. Second-order topological phases in non-hermitian systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019;122:076801. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.076801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Jing H, et al. High-order exceptional points in optomechanics. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:3386. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03546-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Ota Y, et al. Photonic crystal nanocavity based on a topological corner state. Optica. 2019;6:786–789. [Google Scholar]
- 210.Zhang L, et al. Higher-order photonic topological states in surface-wave photonic crystals. Adv. Sci. 2020;7:1902724. doi: 10.1002/advs.201902724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Yang SA, Pan H, Zhang F. Chirality-dependent hall effect in Weyl semimetals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015;115:156603. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.156603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Jiang QD, et al. Topological imbert-fedorov shift in Weyl semimetals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015;115:156602. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.156602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Wang LY, Jian SK. Imbert-Fedorov shift in Weyl semimetals: dependence on monopole charge and intervalley scattering. Phys. Rev. B. 2017;96:115448. [Google Scholar]
- 214.Jiang QD, et al. Chiral wave-packet scattering in Weyl semimetals. Phys. Rev. B. 2016;93:195165. [Google Scholar]
- 215.Chattopadhyay U, et al. Fermi-Arc-induced vortex structure in Weyl beam shifts. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019;122:066602. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.066602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Wang Q, et al. Optical interface states protected by synthetic Weyl points. Phys. Rev. X. 2017;7:031032. [Google Scholar]
- 217.Slobozhanyuk AP, et al. Enhanced photonic spin Hall effect with subwavelength topological edge states. Laser Photonics Rev. 2016;10:656–664. [Google Scholar]
- 218.Ye WM, et al. Photonic Hall effect and helical Zitterbewegung in a synthetic Weyl system. Light Sci. Appl. 2019;8:49. doi: 10.1038/s41377-019-0160-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Zhou M, et al. Electromagnetic scattering laws in Weyl systems. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:1388. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01533-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Peano V, et al. Topological quantum fluctuations and traveling wave amplifiers. Phys. Rev. X. 2016;6:041026. [Google Scholar]
- 221.García-Elcano, I., González-Tudela, A. & Bravo-Abad, J. Quantum electrodynamics near photonic Weyl points. Preprint at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.07513 (2019).
- 222.Zhou X, et al. Optical isolation with nonlinear topological photonics. New J. Phys. 2017;19:095002. [Google Scholar]
- 223.Guo J, et al. Enhanced nonlinear optical responses of graphene in multi-frequency topological edge modes. Opt. Express. 2019;27:32746–32763. doi: 10.1364/OE.27.032746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Wang Y, et al. Topologically enhanced harmonic generation in a nonlinear transmission line metamaterial. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:1102. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08966-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225.Kruk, S. et al. Third-harmonic generation from photonic topological states in zigzag arrays of silicon nanodisks. In Proc. Frontiers in Optics FTh4B.2 (2017).
- 226.Yang, Y. H. et al. Terahertz topological photonics for on-chip communication. Nat. Photonics14, 446–451 (2020).
- 227.Zhang L, et al. Manipulation of topological valley kink states in an ultrathin substrate-integrated photonic circuitry. Laser Photonics Rev. 2019;13:1900159. [Google Scholar]
- 228.Shalaev MI, et al. Reconfigurable topological photonic crystal. New J. Phys. 2018;20:023040. [Google Scholar]
- 229.Li C, et al. Thermo‐optical tunable ultracompact chip‐integrated 1D photonic topological insulator. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2018;6:1701071. [Google Scholar]
- 230.Cao T, et al. Dynamically reconfigurable topological edge state in phase change photonic crystals. Sci. Bull. 2019;64:814–822. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2019.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Kudyshev ZA, et al. Tuning topology of photonic systems with transparent conducting oxides. ACS Photonics. 2019;6:1922–1930. [Google Scholar]
- 232.Shalaev MI, Walasik W, Litchinitser NM. Optically tunable topological photonic crystal. Optica. 2019;6:839–844. [Google Scholar]
- 233.Hayran Z, Gangaraj SAH, Monticone F. Topologically protected broadband rerouting of propagating waves around complex objects. Nanophotonics. 2019;8:1371–1378. [Google Scholar]
- 234.Zhang WF, et al. Finite-dimensional bistable topological insulators: from small to large. Laser Photonics Rev. 2019;13:1900198. [Google Scholar]
- 235.Pilozzi L, et al. Machine learning inverse problem for topological photonics. Commun. Phys. 2018;1:57. [Google Scholar]
- 236.Araki H, Mizoguchi T, Hatsugai Y. Phase diagram of a disordered higher-order topological insulator: a machine learning study. Phys. Rev. B. 2019;99:085406. [Google Scholar]
- 237.Zhang PF, Shen HT, Zhai H. Machine learning topological invariants with neural networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018;120:066401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.066401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238.Deng DL, Li XP, Das Sarma S. Machine learning topological states. Phys. Rev. B. 2017;96:195145. [Google Scholar]
- 239.Sun N, et al. Deep learning topological invariants of band insulators. Phys. Rev. B. 2018;98:085402. [Google Scholar]
- 240.Carrasquilla J. Neural networks identify topological phases. Physics. 2017;10:56. [Google Scholar]
- 241.Schnyder AP, et al. Classification of topological insulators and superconductors in three spatial dimensions. Phys. Rev. B. 2008;78:195125. [Google Scholar]
- 242.De Nittis G, Lein M. On the role of symmetries in the theory of photonic crystals. Ann. Phys. 2014;350:568–587. [Google Scholar]
- 243.Zhao YX, Wang ZD. Topological classification and stability of fermi surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013;110:240404. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.240404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244.Watanabe H, Lu L. Space group theory of photonic bands. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018;121:263903. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.263903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245.Zhou HY, et al. Observation of bulk Fermi arc and polarization half charge from paired exceptional points. Science. 2018;359:1009–1012. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 246.Malzard S, Schomerus H. Bulk and edge-state arcs in non-Hermitian coupled-resonator arrays. Phys. Rev. A. 2018;98:033807. [Google Scholar]
- 247.Cerjan A, et al. Experimental realization of a Weyl exceptional ring. Nat. Photonics. 2019;13:623–628. [Google Scholar]
- 248.Okugawa R, Yokoyama T. Topological exceptional surfaces in non-Hermitian systems with parity-time and parity-particle-hole symmetries. Phys. Rev. B. 2019;99:041202. [Google Scholar]
- 249.Budich JC, et al. Symmetry-protected nodal phases in non-Hermitian systems. Phys. Rev. B. 2019;99:041406. [Google Scholar]
- 250.Ozawa T, et al. Synthetic dimensions in integrated photonics: from optical isolation to four-dimensional quantum Hall physics. Phys. Rev. A. 2016;93:043827. [Google Scholar]
- 251.Zilberberg O, et al. Photonic topological boundary pumping as a probe of 4D quantum Hall physics. Nature. 2018;553:59–62. doi: 10.1038/nature25011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 252.Maczewsky LJ, et al. Synthesizing multi-dimensional excitation dynamics and localization transition in one-dimensional lattices. Nat. Photonics. 2020;14:76–81. [Google Scholar]
- 253.Umucalılar RO, Carusotto I. Fractional quantum hall states of photons in an array of dissipative coupled cavities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012;108:206809. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.206809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 254.Carusotto I, Ciuti C. Quantum fluids of light. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2013;85:299–366. [Google Scholar]
- 255.Hafezi M, Lukin MD, Taylor JM. Non-equilibrium fractional quantum Hall state of light. New J. Phys. 2013;15:063001. [Google Scholar]
- 256.Hormozi L, Möller G, Simon SH. Fractional quantum hall effect of lattice bosons near commensurate flux. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012;108:256809. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.256809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]