Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 21.
Published in final edited form as: J Thorac Oncol. 2009 Oct;4(10):1270–1273. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181b6be57

Imatinib Mesylate in Patients with WHO B3 Thymomas and Thymic Carcinomas

Giuseppe Giaccone *,, Arun Rajan , Rita Ruijter *, Egbert Smit , Cees van Groeningen *, Pancras C W Hogendoorn §
PMCID: PMC7372705  NIHMSID: NIHMS1602078  PMID: 20197733

Abstract

Thymic malignancies are rare tumors of the mediastinum. c-KIT is highly expressed in thymic carcinomas (TC) but infrequently in thymomas. Anecdotal experience suggests activity of imatinib mesylate in TC. Patients with unresectable World Health Organization B3 thymomas or TC, performance status 0 to 2, good organ function, and measurable disease were enrolled in this study. Imatinib was administered at 600 mg PO daily. Seven patients were recruited at one institution: two World Health Organization B3 thymomas and five TC. Imatinib treatment was generally well tolerated. Two patients had stable disease and five progressed. Median survival was 4 months, and median time to progression was 2 months. c-KIT expression was found in one of four samples by immunohistochemistry. No mutations were detected in the c-KIT or PDGFRA genes in three samples analyzed. Imatinib has no major activity in this rare tumor. Given the small number of patients treated in this study, selection based on presence of c-KIT mutations might be warranted.

Keywords: Imatinib, KIT, Thymoma


Thymomas are rare malignancies of the anterior superior mediastinum and represent 0.2 to 1.5% of all malignancies.1

The World Health Organization (WHO) histologic classification reports a continuum of tumors from A to C.2 Thymic carcinomas (TC) (WHO type C) represent less than 1% of thymic malignancies and seem to have a different molecular and clinical profile compared with thymomas.3 In recent years, studies on molecular alterations in thymic malignancies have been published. c-KIT positivity by immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been observed in 73 to 86% of TC.4,5

Imatinib mesylate inhibits several receptor tyrosine kinases that are believed to play a role in the proliferation of tumor cells including those associated with Bcr-Ab1, PDGFR, and c-KIT. Striking activity has been observed with imatinib in chronic myelogenous leukemia6 and gastrointestinal stroma cell tumors (GIST).7,8

We performed this study to evaluate response of highgrade thymic malignancies known to overexpress c-Kit to imatinib mesylate.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients

This was an open-label phase II trial, to test the clinical activity and safety of imatinib in patients with TC. Because of the rarity of TC known to overexpress c-Kit, WHO B3 thymomas were also included in this study. Other inclusion criteria were age more than 18 years, presence of measurable and/or evaluable disease (by WHO Response Criteria), performance status 0 to 2 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group), adequate end organ function (total bilirubin <1.5 × upper limit of normal [ULN], serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase and serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase <2.5 × ULN, creatinine <1.5 × ULN, absolute neutrophil count >1.5 × 109/L, platelets >100 × 109/L, and leukocytes >3 × 109/L), and life expectancy more than 3 months. Written informed consent was obtained.

Patients were treated with imatinib (supplied by Novartis, Basle) 600 mg by mouth once a day. The dosage was increased to 800 mg/d (400 mg twice daily) if there was evidence of objective progression. The maximum duration of treatment was 12 months. Beyond this period, treatment was to be continued at the discretion of the investigator. In case of toxicity, dose adjustments were made according to previously reported guidelines.8 If treatment was interrupted for ≥14 days, then therapy was discontinued. Tumor response was evaluated according to WHO response criteria. Patients with nonmeasurable (but evaluable) disease were evaluated only in terms of time to progression (TTP) and overall survival. Toxicity was evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 2.0.

Before implementing this study, all necessary approvals were obtained from the Institutional Review Board/Independent Ethics Committee.

Expression and Mutation Analysis

Histologic samples were used for IHC to test expression of c-KIT. Expression was assessed as described previously9 and was based on conventional hematoxylin and eosin stains and indirect immunoperoxidase stains for CD117 (polyclonal, 1/250; DAKO, Glostrap, Denmark). The CD117 immunostaining was performed without antigen retrieval, and the presence of mast cells served as an internal control. IHC results were reported as positive/negative.

Sequencing ot the hot spots tor mutations was performed for c-KIT and PDGFRA genes. Tumor DNA was isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded material. DNA was isolated as described earlier.10 Exon 9, 11, 13, and 17 of the c-KIT gene and exon 12 and 18 of the PDGFRA gene were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the primers listed in Table 1. The PCR products were purified (Qiaquick PCR purification KIT, Qiagen, The Netherlands) and screened for mutations by bidirectional sequence analysis, using the forward and reverse PCR primers.

TABLE 1.

Primers Used for the Sequencing of c-KIT and PDGFRA Genes

Gene
Exon
Forward Primer
Reverse Primer
Product Size
c-KIT 9 AGTGCATTCAAGCACAATGG TGGTAGACAGAGCCTAAACATCC 151
c-KIT 11 CTCCAGAGTGCTCTAATGACTGA TGTTATGTGTACCCAAAAAGGTG 248
c-KIT 13 CATCAGTTTGCCAGTTGTGC CAGCTTGGACACGGCTTTAC 182
c-KIT 17 TGGTTTTCTTTTCTCCTCCAA TGCAGGACTGTCAAGCAGAG 185
PDGFRA 12 CCAGTTACCTGTCCTGGTCAT GGAGGTTACCCCATGGAACT 183
PDGFRA 18 TTCCTTTTCCATGCAGTGTG GACCAGTGAGGGAAGTGAGG 165

Statistical Considerations

The primary end point of this study was to assess response rate, and secondary end points were assessment of safety, TTP, and overall survival. The Simon optimal design was used. The accrual goal for the first stage of the trial was 14 patients.

RESULTS

Between June 2005 and August 2006, seven patients with progressive disease and a median age of 67 years (range 36–76) were enrolled from one institution. Three patients who were either elderly or refused chemotherapy received imatinib as first-line therapy. Accrual was stopped after no responses were seen in these patients, and the results of mutation analysis did not confirm presence of mutations in our study and in other series. Survival data has been updated in April 2009. Patient characteristics and treatment outcome are summarized in Table 2.

TABLE 2.

Patient Characteristics and Outcome

Patient No
Gender
Age, yr
Previous Therapy
Stage
Histology
PS
Response
Toxicity
TTP (m)
Following Therapy
Survival (m)
1 M 36 VIP (NC) IVB liver bone Thymus carcinoma 2 NE/PD Vomiting grade 4 1 None 2
2 M 67 Debulking; RT; metastasectomy; carboplatingemcitabine (NC) IVA pleura B3 1 NC Asthenia grade 2, rash grade 1, depression grade 3 8 Pemetrexed (NC); RT 35 +
3 M 47 VIP (PR) Locoregional relapse (IVA) B2/3 1 NC None 9+a Carboplatin-etoposide (MR); radical resection 38 +
4 M 76 No IVB lung Thymus carcinoma 1 PD Nausea grade 1 2 Carboplatin-etoposide (PR); RT 22
5 M 36 CAP IVB bone Thymus carcinoma 2 PD Nausea grade 1, edema grade 1 2 None 4
6 M 71 No IVB pericardium bone Thymus carcinoma 2 PD Nausea grade 1 1 None 1
7 F 69 No IVB lung, neck Thymus squamous carcinoma 2 PD None 0.5 Carboplatin-etoposide (PD) 2
a

TTP censored; patient underwent further chemotherapy followed by resection, in absence of progression on imatinib.

NC, no change; PR, partial response; PD, progressive disease; RT, radiotherapy; VIP, etoposide, ifosfamide, cisplatin; CAP, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, cisplatin; TTP, time to progression; MR, minor response.

Toxicity

Five patients did not report side effects, or they reported only grade 1 nausea or edema. One patient had grade 4 vomiting, which required interruption of treatment twice until progression (no. 1). Another patient (no. 2) developed grade 3 depression, associated with grade 2 asthenia and requested interruption of treatment when no response was documented at first computed tomography evaluation.

Responses and Survival

All five patients with TC had rapid disease progression and have died; the two patients with WHO B3 thymomas had stable disease and are still alive. One of these patients subsequently received carboplatin-etoposide, which induced a minor response, followed by radical resection of the tumor. Seventeen months after surgery, the patient had a locoregional recurrence that was irradiated; the patient is still alive with disease more than 38 months from initiation of imatinib. The other patient stayed on imatinib for two cycles and on progression received pemetrexed and then radiation therapy; he is still alive with disease after more than 35 months from start of imatinib. Median TTP was 2 months and median survival was 4 months for all patients. Patients with B3 thymoma survived significantly longer than patients with TC (p = 0.037).

Immunohistochemistry and Mutation Analysis

Tumor samples could be retrieved from only four patients for molecular analysis. IHC revealed some positivity in one case of B3 thymoma, but was negative in the other patient with B3 thymoma and in two TC (Table 3). Mutation analysis failed in one of the four cases tested. No mutations could be detected in any of the exons of c-KIT or PDGFRA in the other three cases.

TABLE 3.

Results of c-Kit Immunohistochemistry and Mutation Analysis of c-KIT and PDGFRA Genes

Patient No
Histology
Kit Immunohistochemistry
Kit Mutations
PDGFRA Mutations
1 Thymus carcinoma ND ND ND
2 B3 15% cells positive None None
3 B2/3 Negative Failed Failed
4 Thymus carcinoma ND ND ND
5 Thymus carcinoma ND ND ND
6 Thymus carcinoma Negative None None
7 Thymus squamous carcinoma Negative None None

ND, not done.

DISCUSSION

In this prospective study, no responses were seen with imatinib therapy in two patients with WHO B3 thymoma and five patients with TC and progressive disease at study entry. No mutations were detected in c-KIT and PDGFRA genes in three cases where they could be assessed.

The KIT gene belongs to the family of class III receptor tyrosine kinases, which also includes the platelet derived growth factor receptors alpha and beta (PDGFRA and PDGFRB). Overexpression of KIT is seen in a variety of human tumors. However, apart from GISTs, activating mutations of the KIT and PDGFRA genes are uncommon in the majority of human solid tumors.11

A large proportion of TCs (but not thymomas) show immunohistochemical expression of KIT. Strobel et al.12 have described a case of epidermoid carcinoma of the thymus with strong expression of KIT, an activating mutation in exon 11 of the KIT gene (V560del) and a response to imatinib that lasted 6 months.

Pan et al.5 found lmmunohistochemical expression of KIT in 19 of 22 cases (86%) of TC but no expression in 110 thymomas or 16 non-neoplastic thymus glands. They also found no c-KIT mutations in exons 9, 11, 13, and 17 of the KIT gene in 21 of 22 cases of TC by direct DNA sequencing.

Tsuchida et al analyzed KIT expression in 20 cases of thymoma and 17 cases of TC. KIT expression by IHC was seen in 11 cases of TC (all squamous cell carcinomas) and 0 thymomas. No mutations of c-KIT exons 9, 11, 13, and 17 were found in nine cases of TC that were tested.13

Yoh et al.14 analyzed 24 cases of thymoma and 17 cases of TC and found KIT protein expression by IHC in 88% of TC and 0% of thymomas. In 22 cases of thymoma and 11 cases of TC analyzed for mutations of exons 9, 11,13, and 17 of the KIT gene, only one case of TC harbored a missense mutation in exon 11 (L576P).

The presence of mutations in the c-KIT gene determines response to imatinib therapy. In GIST, response rates in patients who harbor mutations in exon 11, exon 9, and those who lack detectable mutations are more than 80, 48, and 0, respectively.7 A phase II study of imatinib at a dose of 400 mg twice daily in 21 patients with metastatic melanoma showed one partial response in a patient with a tumor that displayed a three base pair deletion in exon 15.15

Results of another small study of imatinib in patients with TC were reported by Salter et al.16 Eleven patient s with advanced, unresectable, previously treated TC that was positive by IHC for c-KIT (nine cases) or PDGFR (two cases) were treated with imatinib at a dose of 600 mg by mouth daily on a 21-day cycle. No objective responses were observed. Tumor samples were not analyzed for the presence of mutations in the KIT gene.

A recent report (W. Pao, personal communication) identified two KIT mutations in six resected TC analyzed, one of which is a novel mutation. The potential use of more sensitive methods for mutation analysis may be of interest, and it is conceivable that a small percentage of TCs may harbor KIT mutations.

In summary, imatinib does not seem to have activity in TCs. The rarity of KIT mutations in this disease may be the reason for this negative result. Selection of patients with TC harboring KIT mutations may be of interest for further studies.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors thank Inge H. Briaire-de Bruijn, for performing the immunohistochemistiy and mutation analysis.

Footnotes

Disclosure: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Schmidt-Wolf IG, Rockstroh JK, Schuller H, et al. Malignant thymoma: current status of classification and multimodality treatment. Ann Hematol. 2003;82:69–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rosai J. Histological Typing of Tumors of the Thymus. New York, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Eng TY, Fuller CD, Jagirdar J, Bains Y, Thomas CR Jr. Thymic carcinoma: state of the art review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004;59:654–664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Henley JD, Cummings OW, Loehrer PJ Sr. Tyrosine kinase receptor expression in thymomas. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2004;130:222–224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pan CC, Chen PC, Chiang H. KIT (CD 117) is frequently overexpressed in thymic carcinomas but is absent in thymomas. J Pathol 2004;202: 375–381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kantarjian H, Sawyers C, Hochhaus A, et al. ; International STI571 CML Study Group. Hematologic and cytogenetic responses to imatinib mesylate in chronic myelogenous leukemia. N Engl J Med 2002;346:645–652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Heinrich MC, Corless CL, Demetri GD, et al. Kinase mutations and imatinib response in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:4342–4349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Verweij J, Casali PG, Zalcberg J, et al. Progression-free survival in gastrointestinal stromal tumours with high-dose imatinib: randomised trial. Lancet 2004;364:1127–1134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sciot R, biec-Rychter M, Daugaard S, et al. EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group; Italian Sarcoma Group; Australasian Trials Group. Distribution and prognostic value of histopathologic data and immunohistochemical markers in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs): an analysis of the EORTC phase III trial of treatment of metastatic GISTs with imatinib mesylate. Eur J Cancer 2008;44:1855–1860.. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.de Leeuw WJ, Dierssen J, Vasen HF, et al. Prediction of a mismatch repair gene defect by microsatellite instability and immunohistochemical analysis in endometrial tumours from HNPCC patients. J Pathol 2000; 192:328–335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sihto H, Sarlomo-Rilcala M, Tynninen O, et al. KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha tyrosine kinase gene mutations and KIT amplifications in human solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:49–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Strobel P, Hartmann M, Jakob A, et al. Thymic carcinoma with overexpression of mutated KIT and the response to imatinib. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2625–2626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tsuchida M, Umezu H, Hashimoto T, et al. Absence of gene mutations in KIT-positive thymic epithelial tumors. Lung Cancer 2008;62:321–325.. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yoh K, Nishiwaki Y, Ishii G, et al. Mutational status of EGFR and KIT in thymoma and thymic carcinoma. Lung Cancer 2008;62:316–320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kim KB, Eton O, Davis DW, et al. Phase II trial of imatinib mesylate in patients with metastatic melanoma. Br J Cancer 2008;99:734–740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Salter JT, Lewis D, Yannoutsos C, Loehrer PJ, Risley L, Chiorean EG. Imatinib in the treatment of thymic carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:452s. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES