Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Medicine logoLink to Medicine
. 2020 Jul 17;99(29):e21045. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021045

Decisive evidence corroborates a null relationship between MTHFR C677T and chronic kidney disease

A case–control study and a meta-analysis

Hsueh-Lu Chang a,b,c, Guei-Rung Chen a, Po-Jen Hsiao d, Chih-Chien Chiu e, Ming-Cheng Tai f, Chung-Cheng Kao g, Dung-Jang Tsai a,h, Hao Su i, Yu-Hsuan Chen a, Wei-Teing Chen j,k,∗, Sui-Lung Su a,∗
Editor: Dominik Steubl
PMCID: PMC7373545  PMID: 32702845

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text

Keywords: case–control study, chronic kidney disease, gene polymorphism, gene–environment interaction, meta-analysis, meta-regression, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, trial sequential analysis

Abstract

Background:

Previous meta-analyses have explored the association between the C677T polymorphism of methyltetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) but there were no studies with a decisive conclusion. Furthermore, the high heterogeneity among different populations is not yet interpreted.

Objectives:

This study used trial sequential analysis (TSA) to evaluate whether the nowadays conclusion supported by current cumulative samples. We also applied case-weighted meta-regression to explore the potential gene–environment interactions.

Methods:

For the first stage of this study we conducted a case–control study involving 847 dialysis patients from 7 hemodialysis centers in Taipei during 2015 to 2018 and 755 normal controls from a health center in the Tri-Service General Hospital. The second stage combined the results from the first stage with previous studies. The previous studies were collected from PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases before January 2018.

Results:

From the case–control study, the T allele of MTHFR C677T appeared to have a protective effect on end-stage renal disease compared with the C allele [odds ratio (OR): 0.80, 95% CI (confidence interval) = 0.69–0.93]. However, the meta-analysis contradicted the results in Asian (OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.96–1.30). The same analysis was also applied in Caucasian and presented similar results from Asian (OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 0.98–1.42). The TSA showed our case–control study to be the decisive sample leading to a null association among Asian population. The high heterogeneity (I2 = 75%) could explain the contradictory results between the case–control study and the meta-analysis. However, further case-weighted meta-regression did not find any significant interaction between measured factors and MTHFR C677T on CKD.

Conclusions:

High heterogeneities were found in both Caucasian and Asian, which caused the null relationship in meta-analysis while there were significant effects in individual studies. Future studies should further explore the high heterogeneity that might be hidden in unmeasured gene–environment interactions, to explain the diverse findings among different populations.

1. Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an important issue in public health. The prevalence of CKD is approximately 10% around the world.[1–3] CKD patients are at higher risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and all-cause mortality.[4] Genetic factors such as ethnicity[5] and familial inheritance[6] play important roles in CKD. The heritability of CKD is 20% to 80%, and individual differences originate from genetic mutations.[7–10] Genome-wide association studies have found that many polymorphisms cause CKD.[11,12] Therefore, exploring CKD-related gene polymorphisms is important for reducing the burden of the disease.

Methyltetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) is a key enzyme of 1-carbon cycle. It can convert inactive 5,10-methylenete tetrahydrofolate (THF) to active 5-methyl THF, which assists in converting cysteine to methionine. Homocysteine (Hcy), produced during the conversion process, is pro-inflammatory and causes vascular irritation, which increases the risk of atherosclerotic damage. The most common polymorphism in MTHFR is C677T (rs1801133). The C677T locates in exon 4 of MTHFR and causes a change from alanine to valine. A previous study found that this polymorphism changed the thermolabile of MTHFR[13] and the concentration of homocysteine increased significantly.[14]

Although previous studies have reported an association between MTHFR C677T and CVD, a meta-analysis of randomized control trials (RCTs) found that folate supplements did not significantly decrease the risk of CVD.[15] Many previous studies have researched the relationship between C677T and CKD but the results are inconsistent due to differences in ethnicity, lifestyle, and comorbidities among the study groups.[16–22] Several meta-analyses have also explored the relationship between MTHFR C677T and diabetic nephropathy (DN) since 2007.[23–31] However, no satisfactory consensus has been reached. Therefore, we applied a trial sequential analysis (TSA) proposed by Thorlund et al[32] to evaluate whether the most recent conclusions were supported by the current cumulative samples.

Although the meta-analysis had a higher sample size compared with the traditional case–control study, the population heterogeneity may cause meaningless result. This was mostly due to potential gene–environment interactions. Gene–environment interactions had not yet been explored in conventional meta-analyses owing to the difficulty in using summary data to analyze interactions. For this study, we developed a revised version of meta-regression, case-weighted meta-regression, which resolved the problem.[33] This could be applied in the relationship between MTHFR C677T and CKD to explore the heterogeneity.

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the latest conclusions are supported by the current cumulative samples using trial sequential analysis (TSA). We also provided additional case–control samples to enhance the current evidence. Moreover, we applied case-weighted meta-regression to explore potential gene–environment interactions.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Case–control study

2.1.1. Ethical considerations

This study was approved by the institutional review board (TSGH-1-104-05-006) of the Tri-Service General Hospital (TSGH). Volunteers signed the consent form after the investigators had provided an explanation of the study.

2.1.2. Subjects

Subjects in the case group were hemodialysis patients from 7 Taipei Dialysis Centers during 2015 to 2017. The exclusion criteria were as following:

  • (1)

    dialysis period of < 3 months,

  • (2)

    presence of cancers, and

  • (3)

    insufficient blood samples.

A total of 882 cases were included in the analysis.

Subjects in the control group were selected from volunteers who participated in a physical exam at the Health Management Centre at TSGH. The serum creatinine levels of volunteers were tested, and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula[34] was used to calculate the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The exclusion criteria were shown as following:

  • (1)

    eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2,

  • (2)

    presence of kidney-related diseases (such as positive proteinuria),

  • (3)

    presence of cancers, and

  • (4)

    insufficient blood samples.

Finally, 755 subjects were included in the control group for the analysis.

Demographic data including age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, body mass index (BMI) and blood biochemical parameters (blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, triglycerides, cholesterol, and eGFR) were collected via questionnaire and medical records.

2.1.3. Genomic DNA extraction and genotyping

Medical technologists or nurses collected 5 mL of intravenous blood samples from each of the volunteers. Genomic DNA from peripheral blood samples was isolated using standard procedures for proteinase K (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) digestion and the phenol/chloroform method.[35]MTHFR C677T was genotyped by iPLEX Gold SNP genotyping.[36] Inter- and intra-replication validation was used to assess the genotyping experiment quality. Inter-replication validation was repeated for 78 samples (∼5%), and the concordance rate was 100%.

2.1.4. Statistical analysis

Continuous variables of the general demographic data were expressed as mean and standard deviation using Student t test. The control group was tested for representativeness using the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) test.[37] Differences in genotype and allele frequencies between hemodialysis patients and healthy controls were tested using a χ2 test or Fisher exact test. ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) were calculated using logistic regression. Calculation of genetic polymorphism and ESRD risk was expressed using allele type, genotype, and dominant/recessive models. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant, and the Bonferroni correction was used for multiple comparison correction. R 3.4.2 (R Project for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) was used for statistical analyses.

2.2. Meta-analysis

2.2.1. Search methods and criteria for study consideration

The PRISMA checklist and Meta-analysis on Genetic Association Studies Checklist are described in Supplemental Digital Content (S1 Table).[38] Related terms of “MTHFR C677T” and “chronic kidney disease” were used to search the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for articles published up to December 31, 2018 Supplemental Digital Content (S2 Table). The language of the articles was limited to English. In addition, the publications included in the meta-analysis studies were manually examined to avoid the omission of important articles. The inclusion criteria were as following:

  • (1)

    the study design was case–control or cross-sectional;

  • (2)

    CKD was defined according to the National Kidney Foundation as kidney damage by clinical diagnosis or a GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (samples with lupus nephritis, polycystic kidney disease, endemic nephropathy, and reflux nephropathy were excluded);

  • (3)

    subjects in the control group had normal renal function;

  • (4)

    the article contained the detailed genetic distribution of the MTHFR C667T; and

  • (5)

    the samples were aged >18 years.

When the proportion of diabetic subjects in the case group in an article was 100%, the control group was selected from diabetic patients.

2.2.2. Data extraction

Two reviewers (G-rC and CL) independently extracted the literature data. The collected data included the last name of the first author, year of publication, country, race of the study population, male proportion, mean BMI, diabetes prevalence, hypertension prevalence, smoking prevalence, and gene distribution in the case and control groups.

2.2.3. Statistical analysis

The data of all included articles were described using proportions or mean values where appropriate. The meta-analysis used ORs with 95% CI to examine the correlation between MTHFR C677T polymorphisms and CKD. I2 calculated with the Cochrane Q test was used to assess heterogeneity. I2 > 50% indicated moderate-to-high heterogeneity.[39] Egger regression and funnel plot were used to examine the symmetry after combination. Genetic models including allele type, and dominant and recessive models were used to calculate MTHFR C677T polymorphisms and risk of CKD. The random effects model was used to combine results.

Two methods were used to explore the moderator effects in previous meta-analyses:

  • (1)

    dividing different studies into high- and low-risk groups according to the distribution of moderators for subgroup analysis; and

  • (2)

    applying meta-regression to analyze the correlation between effect size and the distribution of moderators.

In the first method, it is difficult to determine the cutoff point for the moderator, and this tends to increase the probability of false positives.[40,41] Therefore, meta-regression is usually used for moderator effect analysis. However, the matched studies (such as gender- and age-matched studies) were the necessary condition to use traditional meta-regression for analyzing moderator effects. Lin et al[33] have developed a revised version of meta-regression, known as case-weighted meta-regression, to break this limitation. Under the 2 assumptions, rare disease and independence between moderator and independent variable, the odds ratio (OR) of exposure to the disease tended to be close to the proportion of moderators in the case group. Therefore, it was better to extract data from the case group during the meta-analysis.

Considering the high heterogeneity of the combined results, case-weighted meta-regression was applied to examine the source of heterogeneity in this study. Possible environmental factors (such as ethnicity, sex, BMI, and diabetes) were included, and summary data from the case group were extracted to explore gene–environment interactions. The significance level of this study was set at 0.05. The “metafor"[42] and “meta”[43] packages of R software version 3.4.2 were used. TSA was used to validate whether the meta-analysis results obtained a decisive conclusion.[32] OR was used as an effect measure, and the random effects model was used to combine results. Zero event handling was set at 1. The degree of freedom was set at 2. TSA was used for stratification analysis based on race (Caucasian and Asian). Type 1 error was set at 0.05. Power was set at 0.8. Heterogeneity was set at 80%. A review of past literature showed that the OR of correlation between MTHFR C677T and CKD was around 1.2. The 1000 Genome database was used as a reference for minor allele frequency, which is 0.30 for Asians and 0.36 for Caucasians.[44]

3. Results

3.1. Case–control study

Table 1 shows the distribution of general demographic variables and blood biochemical parameters of the study population. A total of 1637 subjects were enrolled in this study, including 755 subjects in the control group with a mean age of 73.86 ± 7.16 years (312 males and 443 females) and 882 subjects in the case group with a mean age of 71.23 ± 13.22 years (461 males and 421 females). There were 607 non-diabetic ESRD patients in the case group with a mean age of 75.13 ± 12.02. The proportion of males was lower in the control group than in the case group (P < .001), and the mean age in the control group was higher than that in the case group (P = .006). The case group showed a higher proportion of diabetic patients, a higher proportion of hypertensive patients, higher creatinine levels, higher fasting blood glucose levels, and higher triglyceride levels than the control group. In addition, the case group showed lower cholesterol level. Table 2 shows the distribution differences in MTHFR C677T genotype between the case and control groups. The gene frequency of the control group followed the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (P = .493). The distribution of the T allele in the control and case groups was 30.5% and 25.9%, respectively, and this difference was significant (P = .004).

Table 1.

Demographic characteristic and laboratory data of case group and control group.

3.1.

Open in a new tab

Table 2.

MTHFR C677T genotype distribution in case group and control group.

3.1.

Open in a new tab

In the allele model after adjusting for sex, age, history of hypertension, and history of diabetes, the T allele of MTHFR C677T was a significant protective factor for ESRD [OR: 0.760 (95% CI: 0.639–0.904)] (Table 3). Similar results were obtained in the genotype and dominant models. To enhance the level of evidence, the case–control data were included in the meta-analysis, and TSA was applied to validate whether the most recent conclusion is supported by the current cumulative samples.

Table 3.

Logistic regression for MTHFR C677T and ESRD using different analytic model.

3.1.

Open in a new tab

3.2. Meta-analysis

The study identification process is shown in Fig. 1. In meta-analysis, a total of 231 articles were found from PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Moreover, 6 articles were manually added from previous meta-analyses. Excluded were: 61 repeated articles, 37 non-case–control studies, 56 articles without CKD, 11 articles focused on kidney transplantation patients, 8 articles for hereditary kidney disease,[45–60] 5 articles that did not provide complete genotype information,[22,61–64] 10 articles without MTHFR C677T,[65–74] 1 familial study,[75] 2 articles on minors,[76,77] 3 articles for auto-immune diseases,[78–80] 3 articles covering non-Asian and non-Caucasians,[81–83] 1 article with an incorrect definition of a control group,[84] 1 article using a duplicated population,[18] and 6 non-English articles.[85–90] Finally, 33 papers were included for meta-analysis. The study by Nemr et al[91] included 2 populations, which resulted in 34 populations being added to the present study Supplemental Digital Content (S3 Table). The allele model was used to combine 34 populations, and the results showed significant differences [OR: 1.15 (95% CI: 1.02–1.30)] and high heterogeneity (I2 = 82%). However, the stratified analyses showed null associations in Asian [OR: 1.12 (95% CI: 0.96–1.30)] and Caucasian [OR: 1.18 (95% CI: 0.98–1.42)], respectively. No significant asymmetry was discovered between the articles. The forest and funnel plots are shown in Fig. 2.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

PRISMA flow chart of meta-analysis. Flow chart of the identification process for eligible studies.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Forest plot and funnel plot of association between MTHFR C677T and all-cause CKD in allele model. Forest plot of MTHFR C677T and all-cause CKD stratified into different races (Allele model).

3.3. TSA evaluation

In the TSA evaluation, the cumulative sample size for Caucasians exceeded the threshold value Supplemental Digital Content (S1 Fig), showing that MTHFR C677T and all-cause CKD are not significantly related (allele model), and a decisive conclusion could be validated. Before adding our case–control samples, the cumulative sample size for the Asian population was 8021 (Fig. 3). After adding our case–control samples, the cumulative sample size was 9658, and the Z curve reached the futility area. This result shows that MTHFR C677T and all-cause CKD are also not significantly related in Asian, and a decisive conclusion could be confirmed. Thus, the case–control samples in this study provided critical evidence for establishing a decisive conclusion.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Trial sequential analysis of MTHFR C677T and all cause CKD among Asian population. TSA is a methodology that calculates sample size for meta-analysis with correction of statistical significance. We performed a TSA under allele model assumption but replaced the allele count with the sample size (divided by 2). Bold line represents cumulative sample size of our case control study. Detailed settings: Significance level = 0.05; Power = 0.80; hypothetical proportion of T allele in control = 0.30; least extreme OR to be detected = 1.2; I2 (heterogeneity) = 80%.

3.4. Gene–environment interactions

The high heterogeneity (I2 = 75%) in Asian could explain the contradictory results between the case–control study and the meta-analysis. The overall analysis had shown a significant association, but stratified analyses showed a non-significant association in both the Asian and the Caucasian sample groups. Therefore, environmental moderators should be explored to explain the heterogeneity. Table 4 summarizes the moderator effects in the association between MTHFR C677T and CKD (allele model). Case-weighted meta-regression was used to analyze the race, sex, BMI, hypertension, DM, and smoke. However, there was no significant gene-environmental interaction between all measured factors and MTHFR C677T.

Table 4.

Moderator effects of allele type model [T vs C] (all-cause CKD).

3.4.

Open in a new tab

4. Discussion

In summary, this meta-analysis showed that MTHFR C677T is not significantly correlated with all-cause CKD in Asian. TSA results showed that the current cumulative samples were sufficient to reach a decisive conclusion and our case–control sample was the critical evidence. The meta-analysis also showed that MTHFR C677T is not significantly correlated with all-cause CKD in Caucasian, and the TSA results showed that the cumulative sample size was also sufficient to reach a decisive conclusion. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first meta-analysis to explore the correlation between MTHFR C677T and all-cause CKD using TSA.

Hcy is mainly metabolized by the liver and kidneys. Due to poor renal function in CKD patients, they are unable to metabolize Hcy, which consequently accumulates in high concentrations.[92] Hcy and its derivatives activate platelets and increase coagulation and oxidative stress. Therefore, they cause vascular endothelial damage and smooth muscle cell hyperplasia,[93–96] thereby increasing the risk of vascular and organ damage. The risk of stroke, atherosclerosis, ischemic heart disease, and death is higher in CKD patients than in the general population,[97–99] and previous studies have speculated that Hcy plays an important role in these diseases. Many observational studies have found that the higher the Hcy level, the greater the risk of CVD-related disease and mortality in CKD patients.[100] However, RCTs have found that the use of folate supplements to reduce Hcy concentration did not lower CVD risk.[101–103] Moreover, MTHFR C677T has been shown to reduce MTHFR activity and increase in vivo Hcy concentrations.[13] Additional pathological and physiological studies are required to investigate the relationship between renal function and MTHFR C677T.

The case–control study found T allele is a significant protective factor for ESRD after adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, and other confounding factors. Although these results are consistent with those reported by of Bloudickova et al,[104] other studies have shown that T allele is not correlated[105–109] and is not a significant risk factor.[110] In addition to differences in ethnicity and region, different demographic characteristics may also result in these contradictions. In our meta-analysis, after adding our case–control samples to the Asian population, the TSA result showed that MTHFR C677T was not significantly correlated with CKD and the cumulative sample size reached the futility area, indicating that a definite conclusion could be reached and that the case–control sample was crucial. The high heterogeneity (I2 = 75%) in the Asian sample could explain the contradictory results between the case–control study and the meta-analysis.

The inconsistent result between proposed homocysteine related mechanism and our non-significant result might be explained by missing heritability issue. The term “missing heritability” was first proposed by Manolio in 2009.[111] Even we had conducted the genome wide association study on a lot of complex phenotype such as height, diabetes, and cholesterol, we still only can find a small part of significant polymorphism and just can explain a little part of each phenotype. This phenomenon is still not solved now in complex phenotype. Chronic kidney disease is clearly a complex disease, which might be affected by multiple factors including ethnicity[112] and family history of disease.[113] In the best of our knowledge, the genome wide association study with large sample also only explained 2% variance in chronic kidney disease.[12] Therefore, the non-significant finding was common. The significant findings in individual studies but non-significant results in larger study might be due to the lack of control for population stratification bias.[114] The high study heterogeneity of our meta-analysis might be due to this issue, and we considered the studies using mixture population was not suitable. We considered the future study should be conducted by whole genome survey process and use the related method for correcting this issue.

This meta-analysis did not detect significant interactions between the measured environmental factors and MTHFR C677T, suggesting that there may be further unmeasured factors to be discovered. Additional studies exploring the effects of gene–environment interactions on CKD are warranted. Ma et al[115] proposed a significant interaction between MTHFR C677T and smoking in people with type 2 diabetes or DN. Among those who smoked, the risk of DN was higher in subjects with the T allele (OR = 1.6, P = .006). Another large-scale cross-sectional study in Japan found no significant interaction between MTHFR C677T and blood folate concentration on CKD.[116] Further stratified analysis found that the risk of developing CKD was higher in subjects with the TT genotype and low blood folate concentration (OR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.30–3.31). Regarding drug–gene interactions, many RCTs have showed significant interactions between MTHFR C677T and folate supplements.[117] In subjects with the TT genotype, the Hcy reduction effects of folate supplements were significant, although a meta-analysis of large-scale RCTs denied the presence of such interactions.[118]

In addition to gene–environment interactions, other studies have explored the effects on the risk of CKD of gene–gene interactions. Rahimi et al[119] found that polymorphism at MTHFR C677T and another locus (A1298C) increased risks of micro-albuminuria and macro-albuminuria (ORMicro = 4.32, 95% CI = 1.5–12.6; ORMacro = 20.4, 95% CI = 5.3–79). Jafari et al[64] found significant interactions between endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) G894T and MTHFR C677T in type 2 diabetes, and where both T allele existed, the risk of developing macro-albuminuria was higher (ORMacro = 38.5, 95% CI = 4.7–319). eNOS encodes nitric oxide synthase, which plays an important role in regulating vascular endothelial function. MTHFR C677T polymorphism increases Hcy concentration and disrupts vascular endothelial cell function. Therefore, we suggest further studies investigate the gene–gene interaction between these 2 genetic factors and MTHFR C677T. However, the 2 aforementioned articles had low sample sizes, and a larger one may be required to validate these interactions.

Our study has the following strengths. To begin with, we included 33 English articles regarding the correlation between MTHFR C677T and CKD in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science (including this study) databases and included 19,734 subjects. In addition, TSA analysis found that a decisive conclusion could be established and the samples in this study were critical evidence. Secondly, due to limitations in summary data for conventional meta-regression analysis, sex, age, and other variables could not be used for interaction analysis. In this study, case-weighted meta-regression was firstly applied for interaction analysis, which not only solved the problem of insufficient power in individual articles but also detected potential interactions in meta-analysis. Thirdly, the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used to perform a complete article quality evaluation, and whether article quality affected the combined results was investigated. Although there was no effect of this factor on the combined results, this approach enhances the reliability of this study. Finally, our meta-analysis could prevent errors compared with previous studies. Our study excluded articles with incomplete genotype information and used the allele model to combine results. Egger regression was not significant for Asians and Caucasians (P > .05). In previous meta-analyses, the fixed effects model was used for combination if heterogeneity was not significant (P ≥ .1) and the random effects model was used if heterogeneity was significant (P < .1).[120–125] This study only used the random effect model to combine results, and could avoid the serious bias that can be caused when heterogeneity is used to select a model.[126]

This study has 3 limitations. First, because individual data could not be obtained in the meta-analysis, the possibility of ecological fallacy cannot be excluded. Although this is a limitation of the meta-analysis, many variables were included in this study and the correlation between these variables was explored. Therefore, the possibility that the study conclusion will be affected by ecological fallacy is extremely low. Second, data on the diet and folate intake status are limited. Therefore, the potential effect of folic acid intake on the association between MTHFR C677T and CKD could not be explored. Third, many of the articles did not provide the complete distribution status of the moderators (such as the mean age and male proportion of populations), which decreased the powers. We suggest future case–control studies should provide detailed information on these factors.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, high heterogeneities were found in both Caucasian and Asian, which produced a null relationship in meta-analysis but significant effects in individual studies. However, after using the case-weighted meta-regression, all the measured factors still cannot explain the source of heterogeneity. Future studies should further explore the high heterogeneity, which might be hidden in unmeasured gene–environment interactions, to explain the diversity findings among different populations. The gene–gene interactions should also be considered such as eNOS G894T and MTHFR A1298C. More specific stratified analysis based on heterogeneity may help us to understand the real relationship between MTHFR C677T and CKD.

Author contributions

H-L C, M-C T, C-C K, W-T C, S-L S conceived and designed the experiments. H-L C, W-T C, H S performed the experiments. H-L C and D-JT analyzed the data. H-L C, P-J H, C-C C, S-L S provided the reagents, materials, and analysis tools. H-L C and G-R C wrote the paper. H-L C, D-J T, Y-H C, W-T C, S-L S were responsible for the critical review and providing comments. H-L C, S-LS and D-JT were responsible for modifying the manuscript.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Digital Content
medi-99-e21045-s001.docx (72.9KB, docx)

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Digital Content
medi-99-e21045-s002.docx (19.3KB, docx)

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Digital Content
medi-99-e21045-s003.docx (16.2KB, docx)

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Digital Content
medi-99-e21045-s004.docx (49.5KB, docx)

Footnotes

Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index, CIs = confidence intervals, CKD = chronic kidney disease, CVDs = cardiovascular diseases, DN = diabetic nephropathy, eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate, eNOS = endothelial nitric oxide synthase, Hcy = homocysteine, HWE = Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, MDRD = modification of diet in renal disease, MTHFR = methyltetrahydrofolate reductase, OR = odds ratio, RCTs = randomized control trials, THF = tetrahydrofolate, TSA = trial sequential analysis.

How to cite this article: Chang H-L, Chen G-R, Hsiao P-J, Chiu C-C, Tai M-C, Kao C-C, Tsai D-J, Su H, Chen Y-H, Chen W-T, Su S-L. Decisive evidence corroborates a null relationship between MTHFR C677T and chronic kidney disease: a case–control study and a meta-analysis. Medicine. 2020;99:29(e21045).

W-TC and S-LS contributed equally to this work.

This study was supported by grants from the Tri-Service General Hospital (TSGH-E-109-254, TSGH-E-109-255), Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST107-2314-B016-052-MY3), Taoyuan Armed Forces General Hospital (TYAFGH-109009, TYAFGH-109052), National Defense Medical Center (MAB-109-081, MAB-109-094, MAB-109-095) and Cheng Hsin General Hospital (CHNDMC-109-8). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

This study was reviewed and approved by the Tri-Service General Hospital committee on human research (Case number: 1-104-05-006). Our manuscript does not report on or involve the use of any animal data or tissue.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Supplemental Digital Content is available for this article.

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • [1].Coresh J, Selvin E, Stevens LA, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the United States. JAMA 2007;298:2038–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Imai E, Horio M, Watanabe T, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the Japanese general population. Clin Exp Nephrol 2009;13:621–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Zhang L, Wang F, Wang L, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in China: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet 2012;379:815–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, et al. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1296–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5]. USRDS, Atlas ESRD. 2012: retrieved September 26, 2012, from the World Wide Web: http://www.usrds.org/atlas.aspx. [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Tsai JC, Chen SC, Hwang SJ, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for CKD in spouses and relatives of hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 2010;55:856–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].MacCluer JW, Scavini M, Shah VO, et al. Heritability of measures of kidney disease among Zuni Indians: the Zuni Kidney Project. Am J Kidney Dis 2010;56:289–302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Parikh NI, Hwang SJ, Yang Q, et al. Clinical correlates and heritability of cystatin C (from the Framingham Offspring Study). Am J Cardiol 2008;102:1194–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Langefeld CD, Beck SR, Bowden DW, et al. Heritability of GFR and albuminuria in Caucasians with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Kidney Dis 2004;43:796–800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Imperatore G, Knowler WC, Pettitt DJ, et al. Segregation analysis of diabetic nephropathy in Pima Indians. Diabetes 2000;49:1049–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Wuttke M, Kottgen A. Insights into kidney diseases from genome-wide association studies. Nat Rev Nephrol 2016;12:549–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Kottgen A, Pattaro C, Boger CA, et al. New loci associated with kidney function and chronic kidney disease. Nat Genet 2010;42:376–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Frosst P, Blom HJ, Milos R, et al. A candidate genetic risk factor for vascular disease: a common mutation in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase. Nat Genet 1995;10:111–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Gudnason V, Stansbie D, Scott J, et al. C677T (thermolabile alanine/valine) polymorphism in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR): its frequency and impact on plasma homocysteine concentration in different European populations. Atherosclerosis 1998;136:347–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Bazzano LA, Reynolds K, Holder KN, et al. Effect of folic acid supplementation on risk of cardiovascular diseasesa meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2006;296:2720–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Lee HA, Choi JS, Ha KS, et al. Influence of 5, 10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphism on plasma homocysteine concentration in patients with end-stage renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis 1999;34:259–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Kimura H, Gejyo F, Suzuki S, et al. The C677T methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene mutation in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000;11:885–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Rahimi M, Hasanvand A, Rahimi Z, et al. Synergistic effects of the MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms on the increased risk of micro- and macro-albuminuria and progression of diabetic nephropathy among Iranians with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Biochem 2010;43:16–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Boger CA, Stubanus M, Haak T, et al. Effect of MTHFR C677T genotype on survival in type 2 diabetes patients with end-stage diabetic nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007;22:154–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Marianna Z, Tibor F, Zsom L, et al. Genetic polymorphisms and the risk of progressive renal failure in elderly Hungarian patients. Hemodial Int 2011;15:501–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Achour O, Elmtaoua S, Zellama D, et al. The C677T MTHFR genotypes influence the efficacy of B9 and B12 vitamins supplementation to lowering plasma total homocysteine in hemodialysis. J Nephrol 2016;29:691–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Rahimi Z, Hasanvand A, Felehgari V. Interaction of MTHFR 1298C with ACE D allele augments the risk of diabetic nephropathy in Western Iran. DNA Cell Biol 2012;31:553–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Chen H, Wei F, Wang L, et al. MTHFR gene C677T polymorphism and type 2 diabetic nephropathy in Asian populations: a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015;8:3662–70. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Yang S, Zhang J, Feng C, et al. MTHFR 677T variant contributes to diabetic nephropathy risk in Caucasian individuals with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Metabolism 2013;62:586–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Zhou TB, Drummen GP, Jiang ZP, et al. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T gene polymorphism and diabetic nephropathy susceptibility in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ren Fail 2015;37:1247–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Cui WP, Du B, Jia Y, et al. Is C677T polymorphism in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene a risk factor for diabetic nephropathy or diabetes mellitus in a Chinese population? Arch Med Res 2012;43:42–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Chang WW, Zhang L, Yao YS, et al. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism and susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy in Chinese type 2 diabetic patients: a meta-analysis. Ren Fail 2013;35:1038–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Chang WW, Jin YL, Zhang L, et al. Association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and diabetic nephropathy or diabetes mellitus risk: need for clarification of data in a recent meta-analysis. Arch Med Res 2012;43:248–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Wu S, Han Y, Hu Q, et al. Effects of common polymorphisms in the MTHFR and ACE genes on diabetic peripheral neuropathy progression: a meta-analysis. Mol Neurobiol 2017;54:2435–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Xiong X, Lin XK, Xiao X, et al. Association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and diabetic nephropathy in the Chinese population: An updated meta-analysis and review. Nephrology (Carlton) 2016;21:5–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Zhang D, Zhou YJ, Han LL, et al. The effect of MTHFR C677T polymorphism on type 2 diabetes mellitus with vascular complications in Chinese Han population: a meta-analysis. Endocr J 2014;61:717–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Wetterslev J, Thorlund K, Brok J, et al. Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:64–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Lin C, Chu CM, Lin J, et al. Gene-gene and gene-environment interactions in meta-analysis of genetic association studies. PLoS One 2015;10:e0124967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34]. NFK, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD). 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Tan SC, Yiap BC. DNA, RNA, and protein extraction: the past and the present. J Biomed Biotechnol 2009;2009:574398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Perkel J. SNP genotyping: six technologies that keyed a revolution. Nat Methods 2008;5:447–53. [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Crow JF. Hardy, Weinberg and language impediments. Genetics 1999;152:821–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Royston P, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W. Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea. Stat Med 2006;25:127–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Altman DG, Lausen B, Sauerbrei W, et al. Dangers of using “optimal” cutpoints in the evaluation of prognostic factors. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994;86:829–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Viechtbauer W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Softw 2010;36:1–48. [Google Scholar]
  • [43]. Schwarzer G. Meta-analysis with R. 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • [44]. Genome, rs1801282. [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Lv C, Bai Z, Liu Z, et al. Renal cell carcinoma risk is associated with the interactions of APOE, VHL and MTHFR gene polymorphisms. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2015;8:5781–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Moore LE, Hung R, Karami S, et al. Folate metabolism genes, vegetable intake and renal cancer risk in central Europe. Int J Cancer 2008;122:1710–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Ferrara M, Capozzi L, Russo R. Impact of the MTHFR C677T polymorphism on risk of Wilms tumor: case-control study. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2009;31:256–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Safarinejad MR, Shafiei N, Safarinejad S. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene C677T, A1298C and G1793A polymorphisms: association with risk for clear cell renal cell carcinoma and tumour behaviour in men. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2012;24:269–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Ravera M, Viazzi F, Berruti V, et al. 5, 10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism and early organ damage in primary hypertension. Am J Hypertens 2001;14(Pt 1):371–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Sakano S, Hinoda Y, Okayama N, et al. Gender-specific association of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase genotype and haplotype with the aggressiveness and prognosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma in Japanese patients. BJU Int 2010;106:424–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Azarpira N, Raisjalali G, Darai M. Polymorphism of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T gene with chronic allograft nephropathy in renal transplant recipients. Exp Clin Transplant 2008;6:54–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].de Alvarenga MP, Pavarino-Bertelli EC, Abbud-Filho M, et al. Combination of angiotensin-converting enzyme and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms as determinant risk factors for chronic allograft dysfunction. Transplant Proc 2007;39:78–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Cossu M, Carru C, Pes GM, et al. Plasma homocysteine levels and C677T MTHFR gene polymorphism in stable renal graft recipients. Transplant Proc 2001;33:1156–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Fodinger M, Wölfl G, Fischer G, et al. Effect of MTHFR 677C>T on plasma total homocysteine levels in renal graft recipients. Kidney Int 1999;55:1072–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Alakulppi NS, Kyllonen LE, Partanen J, et al. Lack of association between thrombosis-associated and cytokine candidate gene polymorphisms and acute rejection or vascular complications after kidney transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008;23:364–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Pavarino-Bertelli EC, Sanches de Alvarenga MP, Goloni-Bertollo EM, et al. Hyperhomocysteinemia and MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms are associated with chronic allograft nephropathy in renal transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 2004;36:2979–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Szabo AJ, Tulassay T, Melegh B, et al. Hyperhomocysteinaemia and MTHFR C677T gene polymorphism in renal transplant recipients. Arch Dis Child 2001;85:47–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [58].Viklicky O, Hubacek JA, Kvasnicka J, et al. Association of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase T677 allele with early development of chronic allograft nephropathy. Clin Biochem 2004;37:919–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].Oetting WS, Zhu Y, Brott MJ, et al. Validation of genetic variants associated with early acute rejection in kidney allograft transplantation. Clin Transplant 2012;26:418–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Weng SC, Shu KH, Tarng DC, et al. Gene polymorphisms are associated with posttransplantation diabetes mellitus among Taiwanese renal transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 2012;44:667–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Kiseljakovic E, Resić H, Kapur L, et al. Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase gene polymorphism in patients receiving hemodialysis. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 2010;10: Suppl 1: S91–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [62].Noiri E, Taguchi J, Nakao A, et al. MTHFR gene polymorphism as an exacerbation factor of diabetic nephropathy in type 2 diabetes. Analysis in Japanese male hemodialysis patients. Diabetes Care 2000;23:260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [63].McDonald S, Maguire G, Duarte N, et al. Homocysteine, renal disease and cardiovascular disease in a remote Australian aboriginal community. Intern Med J 2005;35:289–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [64].Jafari Y, Rahimi Z, Vaisi-Raygani A, et al. Interaction of eNOS polymorphism with MTHFR variants increase the risk of diabetic nephropathy and its progression in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Mol Cell Biochem 2011;353:23–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [65].Allon M, Zhang L, Maya ID, et al. Association of factor V gene polymorphism with arteriovenous graft failure. Am J Kidney Dis 2012;59:682–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [66].Duffy DL, McDonald SP, Hayhurst B, et al. Familial aggregation of albuminuria and arterial hypertension in an aboriginal Australian community and the contribution of variants in ACE and TP53. BMC Nephrol 2016;17:183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [67].Fodinger M, Dierkes J, Skoupy S, et al. Effect of glutamate carboxypeptidase II and reduced folate carrier polymorphisms on folate and total homocysteine concentrations in dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003;14:1314–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [68].Fodinger M, Veitl M, Skoupy S, et al. Effect of TCN2 776C > G on vitamin B12 cellular availability in end-stage renal disease patients. Kidney Int 2003;64:1095–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [69].Ghattas M, El-Shaarawy F, Mesbah N, et al. DNA methylation status of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene promoter in peripheral blood of end-stage renal disease patients. Mol Biol Rep 2014;41:683–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [70].Gungor Y, Kayatas M, Yildiz G, et al. The presence of PAI-1 4G/5G and ACE DD genotypes increases the risk of early-stage AVF thrombosis in hemodialysis patients. Ren Fail 2011;33:169–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [71].Haraki T, Takegoshi T, Kitoh C, et al. Hyperhomocysteinemia, diabetes mellitus, and carotid atherosclerosis independently increase atherosclerotic vascular disease outcome in Japanese patients with end-stage renal disease. Clin Nephrol 2001;56:132–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [72].Montalvao-de-Azevedo R, Vasconcelos MV, Vargas FR, et al. RFC-1 80G > A polymorphism in case-mother/control-mother dyads is associated with risk of nephroblastoma and neuroblastoma. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2015;19:75–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [73].Ozdemir O, Silan F, Urfali M, et al. Variable R.Msp1 fragmentation in genomic DNA due to DNA hypomethylation in CRF patients with MTHFR C677Tgene polymorphism: From genetics to epigenetics. Gene Ther Mol BiolV 16 2014;77–87. [Google Scholar]
  • [74].Poduri A, Mukherjee D, Sud K, et al. MTHFR A1298C polymorphism is associated with cardiovascular risk in end stage renal disease in North Indians. Mol Cell Biochem 2008;308:43–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [75].Zychma MJ, Gumprecht J, Grzeszczak W, et al. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene C677T polymorphism, plasma homocysteine and folate in end-stage renal disease dialysis and non-dialysis patients. Nephron 2002;92:235–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [76].Elshamaa MF, Esam R, Hamdy R, et al. MTHFR C677T and A1298C gene polymorphisms, hyperhomocysteinemia, and intimal medial thickness as risk factors of end-stage renal disease in children on hemodialysis. J Clin Basic Cardiol 2012;7–12. [Google Scholar]
  • [77].Shcherbak NS, Shutskaya ZV, Sheidina AM, et al. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphism as a risk factor for diabetic nephropathy in IDDM patients. Mol Genet Metab 1999;68:375–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [78].Borisov EN, Krasnova TN, Samohodskaia LM, et al. Prognostic value of allelic variants affecting the hemostatic system in the development of antiphospholipid syndrome and kidney lesion in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Ter Arkh 2014;86:57–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [79].Lim PS, Hung WR, Wei YH. Polymorphism in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene: its impact on plasma homocysteine levels and carotid atherosclerosis in ESRD patients receiving hemodialysis. Nephron 2001;87:249–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [80].Kaiser R, Li Y, Chang M, et al. Genetic risk factors for thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 2012;39:1603–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [81].El-Baz R, Settin A, Ismaeel A, et al. MTHFR C677T, A1298C and ACE I/D polymorphisms as risk factors for diabetic nephropathy among type 2 diabetic patients. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst 2012;13:472–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [82].Ibrahim S, El Dessokiy O. Prevalence of methylenetetrahydrofolate gene (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism among chronic hemodialysis patients and its association with cardiovascular disease: a cross-sectional analysis. Clin Exp Nephrol 2009;13:501–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [83].Sharaf SM, Gawish HH, Elsherbiny EM. Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (Mthfr C677t) gene polymorphism effect on development of diabetic nephropathy in Egyptien patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Life Science Journal-Acta Zhengzhou University Overseas Edition 2012;9:874–80. [Google Scholar]
  • [84].Trovato FM, Catalano D, Ragusa A, et al. Relationship of MTHFR gene polymorphisms with renal and cardiac disease. World J Nephrol 2015;4:127–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [85].Domenici FA, Vannucchi MTI, Lataro RC, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) in patients with chronic renal failure on dialysis: incidence of the C677T, A1298A and G1793A. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005;20:V108–108. [Google Scholar]
  • [86].Galiamov MG, Saginova EA, Severova MM, et al. Significance of the factors of hypoxia and endothelial dysfunction in kidney injury in the presence of obesity. Ter Arkh 2013;85:31–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [87].Sun J, Xu Y, Zhu Y. The association of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphism with nephropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus in Chinese. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi 2001;40:529–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [88].Lin L, Guo XZ, Li M. Analysis on relationship of Chinese medicine syndrome pattern with urinary albumin excretion rate and its related factors in early stage diabetic nephropathy. Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi 2010;30:912–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [89].Wang L, Wang J, Xue Y, et al. Relationship between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphism and diabetic nephropathy. Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi 2001;18: [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [90].Yao Y, Liu H, Zhang X, et al. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphism and plasma homocysteine levels in hemodialysing patients. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi 2002;41:522–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [91].Nemr R, Salman RA, Jawad LH, et al. Differential contribution of MTHFR C677T variant to the risk of diabetic nephropathy in Lebanese and Bahraini Arabs. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:1091–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [92].Karmin O, Siow YL. Metabolic imbalance of homocysteine and hydrogen sulfide in kidney disease. Curr Med Chem 2018;25:367–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [93].Outinen PA, Sood SK, Liaw PC, et al. Characterization of the stress-inducing effects of homocysteine. Biochem J 1998;332(Pt 1):213–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [94].Upchurch GR, Jr, Welch GN, Fabian AJ, et al. Homocyst(e)ine decreases bioavailable nitric oxide by a mechanism involving glutathione peroxidase. J Biol Chem 1997;272:17012–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [95].Blundell G, Jones BG, Rose FA, et al. Homocysteine mediated endothelial cell toxicity and its amelioration. Atherosclerosis 1996;122:163–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [96].Guba SC, Fink LM, Fonseca V. Hyperhomocysteinemia an emerging and important risk factor for thromboembolic and cardiovascular disease. Am J Clin Pathol 1996;106:709–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [97].Gonin JM. Folic acid supplementation to prevent adverse events in individuals with chronic kidney disease and end stage renal disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2005;14:277–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [98].Heinz J, Kropf S, Luley C, et al. Homocysteine as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease in patients treated by dialysis: a meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2009;54:478–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [99].Ariyamuthu VK, Balla S, Chaudhary K. Ischemic heart disease in patients undergoing dialysis. Hosp Pract (1995) 2012;40:33–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [100].Hasuike Y, Hama Y, Nonoguchi H, et al. Persistent homocysteine metabolism abnormality accelerates cardiovascular disease in hemodialyzed patients--the Nishinomiya study. J Ren Nutr 2012;22:12–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [101].Pan Y, Guo LL, Cai LL, et al. Homocysteine-lowering therapy does not lead to reduction in cardiovascular outcomes in chronic kidney disease patients: a meta-analysis of randomised, controlled trials. Br J Nutr 2012;108:400–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [102].Manca di Villahermosa S, Tedesco M, Lonzi M, et al. Treatment of hyperhomocysteinaemia in haemodialysis patients at high cardiovascular risk. Clin Ter 2009;160:11–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [103].Jamison RL, Hartigan P, Kaufman JS, et al. Effect of homocysteine lowering on mortality and vascular disease in advanced chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2007;298:1163–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [104].Bloudickova S, Kuthanova L, Hubacek JA. MTHFR and HFE, but not preproghrelin and LBP, polymorphisms as risk factors for all-cause end-stage renal disease development. Folia Biol (Praha) 2014;60:83–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [105].Vychytil A, Fodinger M, Wolfl G, et al. Major determinants of hyperhomocysteinemia in peritoneal dialysis patients. Kidney Int 1998;53:1775–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [106].Makita Y, Moczulski DK, Bochenski J, et al. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphism and susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy in type 1 diabetes. Am J Kidney Dis 2003;41:1189–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [107].Al-Muhanna F, Al-Mueilo S, Al-Ali A, et al. Polymorphism in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, and apolipoprotein E in hemodialysis patients. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2008;19:937–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [108].Zsom M, Fulop T, Zsom L, et al. Genetic polymorphisms and the risk of progressive renal failure in elderly Hungarian patients. Hemodial Int 2011;15:501–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [109].Gutierrez-Amavizca BE, Orozco-Castellanos R, Ortiz-Orozco R, et al. Contribution of GSTM1, GSTT1, and MTHFR polymorphisms to end-stage renal disease of unknown etiology in Mexicans. Indian J Nephrol 2013;23:438–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [110].Tripathi G, Sankhwar SN, Sharma RK, et al. Role of thrombotic risk factors in end-stage renal disease. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2010;16:132–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [111].Manolio TA, Collins FS, Cox NJ, et al. Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature 2009;461:747–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [112].Li S, McAlpine DD, Liu J, et al. Differences between blacks and whites in the incidence of end-stage renal disease and associated risk factors. Adv Ren Replace Ther 2004;11:5–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [113].Kong X, Liu L, Zuo L, et al. Association between family members of dialysis patients and chronic kidney disease: a multicenter study in China. BMC Nephrology 2013;14:19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [114].Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, et al. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 2006;38:904–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [115].Ma L, Jiang Y, Kong X, et al. Interaction of MTHFR C677T polymorphism with smoking in susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy in Chinese men with type 2 diabetes. J Hum Genet 2019;64:23–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [116].Hishida A, Okada R, Guang Y, et al. MTHFR, MTR and MTRR polymorphisms and risk of chronic kidney disease in Japanese: cross-sectional data from the J-MICC Study. Int Urol Nephrol 2013;45:1613–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [117].Toole JF, Malinow MR, Chambless LE, et al. Lowering homocysteine in patients with ischemic stroke to prevent recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction, and death: the Vitamin Intervention for Stroke Prevention (VISP) randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004;291:565–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [118].Lewis SJ, Ebrahim S, Davey Smith G. Meta-analysis of MTHFR 677C- > T polymorphism and coronary heart disease: does totality of evidence support causal role for homocysteine and preventive potential of folate? BMJ 2005;331:1053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [119].Rahimi M, Hasanvand A, Rahimi Z, et al. Synergistic effects of the MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms on the increased risk of micro- and macro-albuminuria and progression of diabetic nephropathy among Iranians with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Biochem 2010;43:1333–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [120].Ding J, Zhu C, Mei X, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma Pro12Ala polymorphism decrease the risk of diabetic nephropathy in type 2 diabetes: a meta analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015;8:7655–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [121].Zhou TB, Guo XF, Yin SS. Association of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma Pro12Ala gene polymorphism with type 2 diabetic nephropathy risk in Caucasian population. J Recept Signal Transduct Res 2014;34:180–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [122].Liu G, Zhou TB, Jiang Z, et al. Relationship between PPARgamma Pro12Ala gene polymorphism and type 2 diabetic nephropathy risk in Asian population: results from a meta-analysis. J Recept Signal Transduct Res 2014;34:131–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [123].Wang L, Teng Z, Cai S, et al. The association between the PPARgamma2 Pro12Ala polymorphism and nephropathy susceptibility in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis based on 9,176 subjects. Diagn Pathol 2013;8:118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [124].Zhang H, Zhu S, Chen J, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma polymorphism Pro12Ala Is associated with nephropathy in type 2 diabetes: evidence from meta-analysis of 18 studies. Diabetes Care 2012;35:1388–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [125].De Cosmo S, Prudente S, Lamacchia O, et al. PPARgamma2 P12A polymorphism and albuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of case-control studies. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011;26:4011–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [126].Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JP, et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2011;343:d4002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Digital Content
medi-99-e21045-s001.docx (72.9KB, docx)
Supplemental Digital Content
medi-99-e21045-s002.docx (19.3KB, docx)
Supplemental Digital Content
medi-99-e21045-s003.docx (16.2KB, docx)
Supplemental Digital Content
medi-99-e21045-s004.docx (49.5KB, docx)

Articles from Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES