Skip to main content
3 Biotech logoLink to 3 Biotech
. 2020 Jul 21;10(8):346. doi: 10.1007/s13205-020-02345-8

Draft genome sequence of Neonectria sp. DH2 isolated from Meconopsis grandis Prain in Tibet

Xiaojing Lin 1,3, Hui Xu 3, Lan Liu 1,2, Huixian Li 1, Zhizeng Gao 1,2,
PMCID: PMC7374493  PMID: 32728513

Abstract

In the current study, we report the high-quality draft genome sequence of Neonectria sp. DH2, an endophytic fungus isolated from Meconopsis grandis Prain in Tibet. The whole genome is about 45.8 Mbp, with a GC content of 53%. A total of 14,163 genes are predicted to encode proteins, and 557 of them are considered as unique, as no matches are found in five gene databases. A neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree based on internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region sequences shows that Neonectria sp. DH2 was most closely related to Neonectria ramulariae. 47 biosynthetic gene clusters (BGC) were identified in Neonectria sp. DH2 genome, and only 5 BGCs shows significant similarities to previously reported BGCs. The presence of 42 unique BGCs in Neonectria sp. DH2 suggests that it has great potential to produce novel secondary metabolites.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s13205-020-02345-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Keywords: Neonectria sp. DH2, Endophytic fungi, Draft genome, Secondary metabolites

Introduction

The ascomycete fungi genus Neonectria are well-known plant pathogens associated with beech and fruit trees bark canker (Calic et al. 2017; Wenneker et al. 2017; Ramsfield et al. 2013). They are also a common genus of endophytic fungal (Zhong et al. 2017; Yang et al. 2015). Some members of this genus produce bioactivity secondary metabolites. For example, endophytic fungus Neonectria ramulariae Wollenw KS-246 produces cytotoxic pyrrocidines and pyrrospirones (Shiono et al. 2008). Another Neonectria sp. isolated from a soil sample from the Qinghai-Tibetan plateaui produces oxaphenalenones and Neonectrolide A–E, which showed cytotoxic effects against human tumor cell lines (Ren et al. 2012). A fungus isolated from a Nasutitermes corniger nest and identified as Neonectria discophora SNB-CN63 displaces a potent antibacterial activity (Nirma et al. 2014). In contrast to the isolation and bioactivity study of their secondary metabolites, the genome information of Neonectria sp. remained under-exploited. Currently, only three genome sequences have been reported: Neonectria ditissima (Genebank Accession LDPL00000000, Deng et al. 2015), Neonectria punicea (Genebank Accession QGQA00000000), and Neonectria hederae (Genebank Accession QGQB00000000). Here, we reported a high-quality draft genome sequence of Neonectria sp. DH2 to better understand the genome of genus Neonectria and exploit its second metabolites production potential.

Materials and methods

Strains and cultivation conditions

Neonectria sp. DH2 was isolated from Meconopsis grandis Prain, a rare Tibetan traditional medicinal herb, in Tibet, China. The strain grew slowly on PDA medium (200 g/L of potato extract, 20 g/L of glucose, and 20 g/L agar) at 20 °C and formed white mycelium and spore gradually.

Genome sequencing, assembly and annotation

Neonectria sp. DH2 was inoculated in 300 mL PDB medium (300 g/L potato, 20 g/L glucose) and cultivated at 20 °C. Mycelium was harvested after 7 days of cultivation. Genomic DNA was extracted by QIAGEN® Genomic DNA extraction kit (Cat#13323, QIAGEN) according to the standard operating procedure provided by the manufacturer. The extracted DNA was quantified by NanoDrop™ One UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) for DNA purity (OD260/280 ranging from 1.8 to 2.0 and OD 260/230 is between 2.0 and 2.2). The genomic DNA was sheared into 20-kb fragments by g-TUBEs (Covaris, USA) and it was sequenced on Sequel Sequencing Kit 2.1 (Pacific Biosciences, USA). The coverage sequencing depth was 80×. The Neonectria sp. DH2 sequence generated 454,780 raw reads consisting of 3,696,611,013 raw nucleotides. The data were assembly using CANU assembler v2.0 (Koren et al. 2017). Repeats were masked by RepeatMasker (Tarailo-Graovac and Chen 2009). The draft genome was annotated using Augustus v3.2 (Stanke et al. 2004) and Genscan v3.0 (Stifanic and Batel 2007). BUSCO v3.0 (Simao et al. 2015) (ascomycota single-copy homologous gene databases) was used to assess the completeness of Neonectria sp. DH2 genome. Of the assembled nucleotides, 96.2% of complete genetic components can be found, and 0.7% of the complete BUSCO single-copy orthologues are duplication, indicating that it is a high-quality assembly. BLAST analysis was based on the non-redundant protein database (Nr), Swiss-Prot, gene ontology (GO), cluster of orthologous groups of eukaryotic proteins (KOG) and kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) databases. RNAmmer (Lagesen et al. 2007) and tRNAscan-SE (Lowe and Eddy 1997) were used to identify rRNAs and tRNAs. The 18S rRNA gene sequence of Neonectria sp. DH2 and several other species were aligned using ClustalW (Oliver et al. 2005) and phylogenetic analysis based on the nearest neighbor-joining method was drawn using MEGA7 (Kumar et al. 2016). CRISPRs webserver was used to identify CRISPR repeats. AntiSMASH 3.0 (Medema et al. 2011) was used to predict secondary metabolite gene clusters.

Results and discussion

The assembly genome is approximately 45.8 Mbp, including 43 contigs. Table 1 shows the detail of the genome annotation. The GC content of Neonectria sp. DH2 genome is 53.00%. The longest contig is 5.08 Mbp and the N50 length is 1,899,89 bp. Approximately 1.18 Mbp repeated regions were found in the genome, accounted for 2.57% of the genome size. Gene prediction analysis yielded a total of 14,163 protein-encoding genes. Of the 14,163 genes predicted, 13,606 (96.07%) were annotated by matching against the non-redundant protein database (Nr), Swiss-Prot, gene ontology (GO), Eukaryotic orthologous groups (KOG) and kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) databases, 557 (3.93%) were considered as unique, without any matches in five databases mentioned above. In addition, 72 rRNA and 210 tRNA genes were identified. Six CRISPR repeats were detected. Among the predicted genes, 28.51% were assigned to KOG. Table 2 presents the distribution of genes into KOGs functional categories. A neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree was build based on 18 s rRNA gene sequences of Neonectria sp. DH2 (from RNAmmer) and other 33 Hypocreales fungi with outgroup of Aspergillus oryzae (Fig. 1). Neonectria sp. DH2 was clustered together with Cylindrocarpon/Neonectria genus and was most closely related to Neonectria ramulariae (Deng et al. 2015).

Table 1.

General features of the Neonectria sp. DH2

Attribute Value
Genome size (Mbp) 45
DNA G+C content (%) 53
DNA contigs 43
Contig N50 (bp) 1,899,891
Largest contig (Mbp) 5.08
CRISPR repeats 6
rRNA 72
tRNA 210
Genes with function prediction 13,606
Annotated in Nr 13,597 (96.00%)
Annotated in SwissProt 9369 (66.15%)
Annotated in GO 7329 (51.75%)
Annotated in KOG 4038 (28.51%)
Annotated in KEGG 2756 (19.46%)

Table 2.

Number of genes associated with general KOG functional categories

Code Value %age feature
B 46 0.32 Chromatin structure and dynamics
C 363 2.56 Energy production and conversion
E 269 1.90 Amino acid transport and metabolism
A 99 0.70 RNA processing and modification
F 54 0.38 Nucleotide transport and metabolism
G 275 1.94 Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
H 77 0.54 Coenzyme transport and metabolism
J 195 1.38 Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
K 134 0.95 Transcription
V 34 0.24 Defense mechanisms
L 84 0.59 Replication, recombination and repair
I 336 2.37 Lipid transport and metabolism
M 97 0.68 Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N 2 0.01 Cell motility
O 328 2.32 Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
Y 5 0.04 Nuclear structure
T 240 1.69 Signal transduction mechanisms
Q 423 2.99 Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R 929 6.56 General function prediction only
Z 59 0.42 Cytoskeleton
S 206 1.45 Function unknown
P 115 0.81 Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
W 6 0.04 Extracellular structures
X 1 0.01 Unknown

The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the genome

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of 18 s rRNA gene sequences of Neonectria sp. DH2 and its taxonomic neighbors. Aspergillus oryzae was used as the outgroup. The evolutionary history was inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Maximum Composite Likelihood method and are in the units of the number of base substitutions per site. The analysis involved 35 nucleotide sequences. Codon positions included were 1st + 2nd + 3rd + Noncoding. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. There are 235 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were by MEGA7

Most filamentous fungi produce secondary metabolites with diverse biological activities such as cholesterol-lowering, anti-tumor, and antibiotic activities. Based on domain searching of the putative biosynthetic core genes and associated genes, 47 BGCs were predicted by antiSMASH (Table 3 and Additional file 1: Table S1): 16 polyketide synthase (PKS), 15 nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS), 6 polyketide–nonribosomal peptide hybrid synthase (PKS-NRPS) and 4 terpene synthase genes. Of the 47 BGCs, 5 BGCs show similarities with previously reported gene clusters (Table 4 and Additional file 2). The antiSMASH prediction suggests that Neonectria sp. DH2 may produce small molecules similar to desmethylbassianin (Fisch et al. 2011), bikaverin (Arndt et al. 2015), fujikurins (Von Bargen et al. 2015), fusaric acid (Brown et al. 2012) and LL-Z1272β (Li et al. 2016). The other 42 BGCs do not have significant homologous to previously reported BGCs, suggesting that Neonectria sp. DH2 has a remarkable potential to produce many novel secondary metabolites that might have interesting biological activities.

Table 3.

The BGCs of Neonectria sp. DH2 predicted by antiSMASH

Type Count
PKS 15
NRPS 13
T1PKS-NRPS hybrid 6
Terpene 5
Others 8
total 47

Table 4.

Comparison of 5 BGCs from Neonectria sp. DH2 with previously reported BGCs

BGCs from Neonectria sp. DH2 Reported BGCs Percentage of similarity (%)
cluster3 Desmethylbassianin biosynthetic gene cluster 60
cluster14 Bikaverin biosynthetic gene cluster 42
cluster17 Fujikurins biosynthetic gene cluster 33
cluster 22 Fusaric acid biosynthetic gene cluster 45
cluster 37 LL-Z1272β biosynthetic gene cluster 100

Genome accession number and CCTCC Patent number

The whole genome project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/Genebank under the accession RQWH00000000 (bioproject PRJNA507358). The strain has been submitted to China Center for Type Culture Collection (CCTCC) for patent and reservation under the patent number CCTCC M 2015499.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou (No. 201804010476), National Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong (No. 2018A030313334) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 17lgpy64).

Compliance and ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Arndt B, Studt L, Wiemann P, Osmanov H, Kleigrewe K, Kohler J, Krug I, Tudzynski B, Humpf HU. Genetic engineering, high resolution mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy elucidate the bikaverin biosynthetic pathway in Fusarium fujikuroi. Fungal Genet Biol. 2015;84:26–36. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2015.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown DW, Butchko RAE, Busman M, Proctor RH. Identification of gene clusters associated with fusaric acid, fusarin, and perithecial pigment production in Fusarium verticillioides. Fungal Genetics Biol. 2012;49:521–532. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2012.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Calic I, Koch J, Carey D, Addo-Quaye C, Carlson JE, Neale DB. Genome-wide association study identifies a major gene for beech bark disease resistance in American beech (Fagus grandifolia Ehrh.) BMC Genomics. 2017;18:1. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3931-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Deng CH, Scheper Reiny WA, Thrimawithana AH, Bowen JK. Draft genome sequences of two isolates of the plant-pathogenic fungus Neonectria ditissima that differ in virulence. Genome Announc. 2015;3:1–2. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01348-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fisch KM, Bakeer W, Yakasai AA, Song ZS, Pedrick J, Wasil Z, Bailey AM, Lazarus CM, Simpson TJ, Cox RJ. Rational domain swaps decipher programming in fungal highly reducing polyketide synthases and resurrect an extinct metabolite. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:16635–16641. doi: 10.1021/ja206914q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin K, Miller JR, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res. 2017;27:722–736. doi: 10.1101/gr.215087.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33:1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rodland EA, Staerfeldt HH, Rognes T, Ussery DW. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:3100–3108. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Li C, Matsuda Y, Gao H, Hu D, Yao XS, Abe I. Biosynthesis of LL-Z1272beta: discovery of a new member of NRPS-like enzymes for aryl-aldehyde formation. ChemBioChem. 2016;17:904–907. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201600087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:955–964. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.5.955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Maja Tarailo-Graovac, Nansheng Chen. Using RepeatMasker to identify repetitive elements in genomic sequences. Curr Protoc Bioinf. 2009;1:1. doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0410s25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Medema MH, Blin K, Cimermancic P, de Jager V, Zakrzewski P, Fischbach MA, Weber T, Takano E, Breitling R. antiSMASH: rapid identification, annotation and analysis of secondary metabolite biosynthesis gene clusters in bacterial and fungal genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:W339–346. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nirma C, Eparvier V, Stien D. Antibacterial ilicicolinic acids C and D and ilicicolinal from Neonectria discophora SNB-CN63 isolated from a termite nest. J Nat Prod. 2014;78:159–162. doi: 10.1021/np500080m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Oliver T, Schmidt B, Nathan D, Clemens R, Maskell D. Using reconfigurable hardware to accelerate multiple sequence alignment with ClustalW. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:3431–3432. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ramsfield TD, Power MWP, Kimberley MO. The relationship between pruning and the incidence of Neonectria fuckeliana in Pinus radiata. N Z J For Sci. 2013 doi: 10.1186/1179-5395-43-13. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ren JW, Zhang F, Liu XY, Li L, Liu G, Liu XZ, Che YS. Neonectrolide A, a new oxaphenalenone spiroketal from the fungus Neonectria sp. Org Lett. 2012;14:6226–6229. doi: 10.1021/ol302979f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Shiono Y, Shimanuki K, Hiramatsu F, Koseki T, Tetsuya M, Fujisawa N, Kimura K. Pyrrospirones A and B, apoptosis inducers in HL-60 cells, from an endophytic fungus, Neonectria ramulariae Wollenw KS-246. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2008;18:6050–6053. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.10.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Simao FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3210–3212. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Stanke M, Steinkamp R, Waack S, Morgenstern B. AUGUSTUS: a web server for gene finding in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:W309–W312. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Stifanic M, Batel R. Genscan for Arabidopsis is a valuable tool for predicting sponge coding sequences. Biologia. 2007;62:124–127. doi: 10.2478/s11756-007-0037-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Von Bargen KW, Niehaus EM, Krug I, Bergander K, Wurthwein EU, Tudzynski B, Humpf HU. Isolation and Structure Elucidation of Fujikurins A-D: products of the PKS19 Gene Cluster in Fusarium fujikuroi. J Nat Prod. 2015;78:1809–1815. doi: 10.1021/np5008137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wenneker M, de Jong PF, Joosten NN, Goedhart PW, Thomma BPHJ. Development of a method for detection of latent European fruit tree canker (Neonectria ditissima) infections in apple and pear nurseries. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2017;148:631–635. doi: 10.1007/s10658-016-1115-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Yang HR, Hu XP, Jiang CJ, Qi J, Wu YC, Li W, Zeng YJ, Li CF, Liu SX. Diversity and antimicrobial activity of endophytic fungi isolated from Cephalotaxus hainanensis Li, a well-known medicinal plant in China. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2015;61:484–490. doi: 10.1111/lam.12483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhong LY, Zou L, Tang XH, Li WF, Li X, Zhao G, Zhao JL. Community of endophytic fungi from the medicinal and edible plant Fagopyrum tataricum and their antimicrobial activity. Trop J Pharm Res. 2017;16:387–396. doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v16i2.18. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from 3 Biotech are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES