Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2020 Jul 21;10:12026. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69070-3

Standardized treatment and determinants on 9,059 syphilis-infected pregnant women during 2015–2018 in Hunan, China

Huixia Li 1,2, Jingjing Tan 1, Zhongwen Luo 1,, Jianfei Zheng 3, Guangwen Huang 1, Juan Xiao 1, Qun Huang 1, Na Feng 4
PMCID: PMC7374608  PMID: 32694571

Abstract

This study was aimed to describe the standardized treatment rate of syphilis-infected pregnant women in Hunan province and to explore the determinants for standardized treatment. All syphilis-infected pregnant women registered in the Information System of Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission of Syphilis Management (IPMTCT) in Hunan between January 2015 and December 2018 were included in this study. Among 9,059 pregnant women with syphilis, 7,797 received syphilis treatment, with a treatment rate of 86.1%, and 4,963 underwent standardized syphilis treatment, with an average standardized treatment rate of 54.8%. The facilitators for the standardized treatment included abnormal reproductive histories (aOR = 1.15, 95%CI:1.03–1.28), time of first prenatal care within 1–12 weeks (aOR = 5.17, 95%CI:4.19–6.37) or within 13–27 weeks (aOR = 5.56, 95%CI:4.46–6.92), previous syphilis infection (aOR = 1.64, 95%CI: 1.48–1.81), and definite syphilis infection status of sexual partner (negative: aOR = 1.73, 95%CI:1.57–1.91; positive: aOR = 1.62, 95%CI:1.34–1.95). The barriers included marital status being unmarried/divorced/widowed (aOR = 0.81, 95%CI: 0.65–0.99), pluripara (aOR = 0.58, 95%CI: 0.46–0.74), number of children ≥ 2 (aOR = 0.45, 95%CI: 0.35–0.57), and syphilis clinical stage being primary/secondary/tertiary (aOR = 0.72, 95%CI: 0.58–0.88) or unclear (aOR = 0.78, 95%CI: 0.70–0.86). Though the treatment rate of syphilis-infected pregnant women was high, the standardized treatment rate was low. The facilitators and barriers on standardized treatment of gestational syphilis were identified at the patient level.

Subject terms: Infectious diseases, Epidemiology

Introduction

Syphilis is a chronic sexually-transmitted disease caused by Treponema pallidum infection and invades multiple systems. The epidemic situation of syphilis is severe in China. Data from National Bureau of Statistics of China show the reported case number of syphilis in 2017 was 475,860 and the reported incidence was 34.5/100,000, which ranked first among all sexually-transmitted diseases. Gestational syphilis, the syphilis occurring or discovered during pregnancy, includes progestational or gestational syphilis and is dominated by latent infection. T. pallidum can be transmitted via the placenta to the fetus. The incidence rates of gestational syphilis in China are 0.2–0.5%13, which are lower than the levels in Africa (1.1%) and South America (1.6%)4,5. The untreated gestational syphilis can cause severe adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, premature delivery, low birth weight, neonatal death and congenital syphilis, and the incidence rates of overall adverse pregnancy outcomes are up to 25–77%69.

To eliminate the mother-to-child transmission of syphilis and improve the pregnancy outcomes of syphilis-infected pregnant women, China integrated the "screening, diagnosis, treatment and detected follow-up" comprehensive intervention measures into the Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission of Syphilis (PMTCT) project and applied to the whole country in 2011. The key measure against the mother-to-child transmission of syphilis is to use prompt, full-course and sufficient penicillin treatment. The PMTCT implementation plan in 2011 recommended the therapeutic drug of benzathine penicillin or procaine penicillin, the replacement with ceftriaxone in the unavailability of penicillin, and the use of erythromycin for penicillin-allergic patients. Along with the implementation of PMTCT in China, the prenatal syphilis detection rate and treatment rate among pregnant women were significantly improved from 67.4 to 94.1% and from 58.8 to 89.4% respectively from 2012 to 201610. However, the standardized treatment rates of syphilis were only less than 60%6,10,11, which severely reduced the mother-to-child transmission blocking effect. Hunan province initiated PMTCT among 21 counties in 2011, then extended to 48 counties in 2014 and covered all 123 counties in 2015. During the initial five years of the implementation of PMTCT in Hunan, the prenatal syphilis detection rate among pregnant women was significantly increased from 44.2% in 2011 to 90.8% in 2015, but the maternal syphilis treatment rate, especially the standardized treatment rate, was still unclear12.

The existing research on gestational syphilis treatment is focused on congenital syphilis and other adverse pregnancy outcomes1316, but rarely on the situation or determinants on standardized treatment of gestational syphilis17. Studying the determinants on standardized treatment of gestational syphilis helps to identify the barriers and facilitators for standardized treatment and to underlie the further improvement of standardized treatment rates, thereby promoting the effective implementation of measures against mother-to-child syphilis transmission. In this study, the surveillance data about PMTCT of syphilis implemented in Hunan province of China between 2015 and 2018 were used. Then the determinants on standardized treatment of syphilis among pregnant women were investigated, which scientifically underlay the management of gestational syphilis.

Materials and methods

Subjects

The Information System of Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission of Syphilis (IPMTCT) is a nationwide health facilities-based case report system established in 2011 and has been used to monitor and evaluate the epidemics of maternal syphilis and congenital syphilis in China. All syphilis-infected pregnant women registered in the IPMTCT of Hunan between January 2015 and December 2018 were included in this study. The inclusion criteria were: (1) pregnant women at age ≥ 18; (2) syphilis-infected pregnant women who were positive in both non-T. pallidum antigen serological (NTPAS) tests and T. pallidum antigen serological (TPAS) tests; (3) diagnosis time of syphilis infection being between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2018. The exclusion criteria were: (1) non-resident pregnant women; (2) penicillin-allergic patients.

Syphilis infection and diagnostic criteria

Health facilities provided all pregnant women with free syphilis screening tests in the first prenatal care by using NTPAS test, which were either rapid plasma reagin ring card (RPR) test or toluidine red unheated serum (TRUST) test. The patients with positive results in the NTPAS test were confirmed using TPAS tests, including T. pallidum particle assay (TPPA), T. pallidum haemagglutination assay (TPHA) or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). According to Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV/AIDS, Syphilis and Hepatitis B, syphilis infection was diagnosed as being positive in both NTPAS tests (RPR or TRUST) and TPAS tests (TPPA or TPHA or ELISA). The syphilis was classified by Gestational Syphilis and Congenital Syphilis Prevention and Treatment Guideline into the latent, primary, secondary and tertiary stages18.

Treatment of syphilis

Pregnant women were immediately treated upon the discovery of syphilis infection. The first choice for syphilis treatment was penicillin, which was recommended to be either benzathine penicillin or procaine penicillin G. For unavailablity of penicillin or for penicillin allergy, the optional replacing antibiotic was either ceftriaxone or erythromycin. The syphilis-infected pregnant women discovered at the first trimester of pregnancy received 1 course of treatment at both the first and third trimesters. The syphilis-infected pregnant women discovered at the second or third trimester were immediately given a 2-course treatment, and the interval between the two courses was above 4 weeks (at least 2 weeks), and the second course was started at the third trimester and should be finished 1 month before labor. Those who were diagnosed right before labor were given 1 course of treatment. During the treatment, patients with reoccurrence or secondary infection were given another course of treatment.

A standardized treatment was defined as a 2-course treatment with sufficient penicillin during pregnancy (e.g. "1 course" for benzathine penicillin was defined as 1 time each week for three consecutive times; "1 course" for procaine penicillin G was defined as 1 time each day for 15 consecutive days), the interval between the 2 courses was above 2 weeks, and the 2nd course was conducted and finished at the third trimester. The non-standardized treatment referred to no reception of full-course and sufficient penicillin treatment, or reception of non-penicillin replaced treatment during the pregnancy, or conduction of syphilis treatment only 1 month before labor.

Data collection

The registration data of syphilis-infected pregnant women from the Hunan IPMTCT included social demographic data, reproductive histories, syphilis infection and treatment. Specifically, social demographic data included age, ethnicity, residence, education level, occupation, and marital status. Information about reproductive histories included gravidity, parity, abnormal reproductive histories, pregnancy complications, and number of children. Information about syphilis diagnosis and treatment included time of first prenatal care, period of syphilis screening and diagnosis, syphilis clinical stage, previous syphilis infection, syphilis treatment, and syphilis infection status of sexual partner.

Definition of variables

The age of pregnant women was divided into 5 groups: < 20, 20–24, 25–29, 30–34 and ≥ 35. Ethnicity included Han and minorities. Residence was separated into nonurban and urban. The education level was classified into primary school or below, middle school, and college or above. Occupation was divided into farmers, housework or unemployment, and others. The marital status was divided into married, and unmarried/divorced/widowed. The time of first prenatal care was separated into the first trimester (1–12 weeks), second trimester (13–27 weeks) and third trimester (≥ 28 weeks). The period of syphilis diagnosis was divided into the first trimester (1–12 weeks), second trimester (13–27 weeks), third trimester (≥ 28 weeks) and intrapartum/postpartum. The clinical stage of syphilis was divided into the latent, primary, secondary and tertiary stages. Previous syphilis infection meant that a pregnant woman had been confirmed with positive syphilis infection before the last menstrual period of this pregnancy, and was obtained based on her self-report for the syphilis infection status. The syphilis infection status of the sexual partner was considered as unclear (unexamined/unknown), negative and positive.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed on SPSS 25.0 (IBM, Chicago, USA). The standardized treatment rates of syphilis-infected pregnant women with different characteristics were compared using chi-square test. With "whether or not the pregnant women received a standardized treatment during pregnancy" as the dependent variable (yes = 1, no = 0), the significant variables identified by univariate analysis were sent into a multivariate logistic regression model, and the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of each variables were calculated. The selection of independent variables was based on forward stepwise regression (αin = 0.05, αout = 0.10). The statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Ethics approval

All syphilis-infected pregnant women were required to complete a special questionnaire developed by the national PMTCT program to register the information about their syphilis screening, diagnosis and treatment. Prenatal syphilis screening, diagnosis and treatment were conducted following the guidelines and regulations of the integrated National PMTCT Program of HIV, Syphilis and Hepatitis B. As syphilis-infected pregnant women had signed informed consent in the PMTCT program, a special informed consent for this retrospective study was not required. Given these reasons, the Ethics Committee of Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital approved our study and waived the informed consent. The retrospective study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Strict confidentiality was adhered to regarding any data collected throughout the study.

Results

Treatment status of pregnant women with syphilis

Initially, 9,289 pregnant women with syphilis were enrolled. After 137 non-resident cases, 39 cases aged < 18 years and 54 penicillin-allergic cases were excluded, a total of 9,059 cases were finally involved in our analyses. Of them, 7,797 cases received syphilis treatment, with a treatment rate of 86.1% (7,797/9,059), and 4,963 cases underwent the standardized syphilis treatment, with an average standardized treatment rate of 54.8% (4,963/9,059). The standardized treatment rate increased from 29.9% (488/1631) in 2015 to 72.9% (2,123/2,912) in 2018. Moreover, 4,096 subjects received non-standardized treatment (including 1,262 cases of non-treatment during pregnancy; 178 cases of non-penicillin replaced treatment; 2,656 cases with insufficient penicillin treatment), with a non-standardized treatment rate of 45.2% (4,096/9,059). The treatment regimen was dominated by benzathine penicillin (84.1%, Table 1).

Table 1.

Treatment for pregnant women with syphilis.

Syphilis treatment Frequency Rate, %
Treatment
Yes 7,797 86.1
No 1,262 13.9
Standardized treatment
Yes 4,963 54.8
No 4,096 45.2
 Non-treatment 1,262 13.9
 Non-penicillin treatment 178 2.0
 Insufficient course for penicillin treatment 2,656 29.3
Standardized treatment rate from 2015–2018
2015 488/1631 29.9
2016 914/1983 46.1
2017 1,438/2,533 56.8
2018 2,123/2,912 72.9
Treatment regimens
Benzathine penicillin 7,619 84.1
Procaine penicillin G 92 1.1
Ceftriaxone 86 0.9
Non-treatment 1,262 13.9
Total 9,059 100.0

Characteristics of pregnant women with syphilis

The 9,059 pregnant women with syphilis were aged 29.4 ± 5.6 years, ranging from 18 to 50 years, and mostly (34.3%) were aged 25–29 years. The ethnicity was dominated by Han (87.2%). About 51.3% of them lived in nonurban areas. The education level was mostly middle school (86.3%), and the occupation was mostly "housework or unemployment" (48.1%). About 94.6% of them were married, and 68.3% of them were pluriparas. About 66.0% of them underwent the first prenatal care at ≤ 12 weeks; 68.9% of them were diagnosed at < 28 weeks, and 67.2% of them suffered latent syphilis. Moreover, 70.0% of them had no previous syphilis infection, and 62.1% had sexual partners with unclear syphilis infection (Table 2).

Table 2.

Characteristics and standardized treatment rate for pregnant women with syphilis.

Characteristics Frequency
(n = 9,059)
Proportion, % Standardized treatment
Number Rate, % χ2 P value
Maternal age (years) 33.860 0.000*
  < 20 213 2.4 106 49.8
 20–24 1573 17.4 831 52.8
 25–29 3,105 34.3 1815 58.5
 30–34 2,398 26.5 1,315 54.8
  ≥ 35 1,770 19.5 896 50.6
Ethnicity 24.553 0.000*
 Han 7,903 87.2 4,408 55.8
 Minorities 1,156 12.8 555 48.0
Residence 0.433 0.511
 Nonurban 4,648 51.3 2,562 55.1
 Urban 4,411 48.7 2,401 54.4
Education level 17.638 0.000*
 Primary school or below 676 7.5 324 47.9
 Middle school 7,816 86.3 4,303 55.1
 College or above 567 6.3 336 59.3
Occupation 100.822 0.000*
 Farmer 2,932 32.4 1,413 48.2
 Housework or unemployment 4,360 48.1 2,614 60.0
 Others 1767 19.5 936 53.0
Marital status 10.944 0.001*
 Married 8,569 94.6 4,730 55.2
 Unmarried/divorced/widowed 490 5.4 233 47.6
Gravidity 13.087 0.004*
 Primigravidae 1757 19.4 1,024 58.3
 1 previous pregnancy 2,892 31.9 1,590 55.0
 2 previous pregnancy 2,130 23.5 1,143 53.7
  ≥ 3 previous pregnancy 2,280 25.2 1,206 52.9
Parity 173.436 0.000*
 Primipara 2,869 31.7 1862 64.9
 Pluripara 6,190 68.3 3,101 50.1
Abnormal reproductive histories 9.306 0.002*
 Yes 1972 21.8 1,140 57.8
 No 7,087 78.2 3,823 53.9
Pregnancy complications 0.429 0.513
 Yes 1,037 11.4 578 55.7
 No 8,022 88.6 4,385 54.7
Number of children 404.889 0.000*
 0 3,184 35.1 2025 63.6
 1 4,282 47.3 2,410 56.3
  ≥ 2 1593 17.6 528 33.1
Time of first prenatal care 457.219 0.000*
 1–12 weeks of gestation 5,978 66.0 3,457 57.8
 13–27 weeks of gestation 2,360 26.1 1,385 58.7
  ≥ 28 weeks of gestation 721 8.0 121 16.8
Period of syphilis diagnosis 3,919.722 0.000*
 1–12 weeks of gestation 4,236 46.8 3,185 75.2
 13–27 weeks of gestation 1998 22.1 1534 76.8
  ≥ 28 weeks of gestation 507 5.6 244 48.1
 Intrapartum/postpartum 2,318 25.6 0 0.0
Clinical stage of syphilis 94.404 0.000*
 Latent syphilis 6,092 67.2 3,553 58.3
 Primary/secondary/tertiary syphilis 447 4.9 219 49.0
 Unclear 2,520 27.8 1,191 47.3
Previous syphilis infection 157.580 0.000*
 Yes 2,717 30.0 1761 64.8
 No 6,342 70.0 3,202 50.5
Syphilis infection status of sexual partner 209.712 0.000*
 Unclear 5,626 62.1 2,752 48.9
 Negative 2,856 31.5 1859 65.1
 Positive 577 6.4 352 61.0
Total 9,059 4,963 54.8

*P < 0.05.

Univariate analysis for standardized treatment of syphilis-infected pregnant women

Univariate analysis showed that the factors related with standardized treatment of syphilis-infected pregnant women included the maternal age, ethnicity, education level, occupation, marital status, gravidity, parity, abnormal reproductive histories, number of children, time of first prenatal care, period of syphilis diagnosis, syphilis clinical stage, previous syphilis infection, and syphilis infection status of sexual partner (Table 2). The unrelated factors were residence and pregnancy complications.

Multivariate analysis for standardized treatment of syphilis-infected pregnant women

Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed the facilitators for the standardized syphilis treatment in pregnant women included abnormal reproductive histories (aOR = 1.15, 95%CI: 1.03–1.28), time of first prenatal care within 1–12 weeks (aOR = 5.17, 95%CI: 4.19–6.37) or 13–27 weeks (aOR = 5.56, 95%CI: 4.46–6.92), previous syphilis infection (aOR = 1.64, 95%CI: 1.48–1.81), and definite syphilis infection status of sexual partner (negative: aOR = 1.73, 95%CI: 1.57–1.91; positive: aOR = 1.62, 95%CI: 1.34–1.95). The barriers included marital status being unmarried/divorced/widowed (aOR = 0.81, 95%CI: 0.65–0.99), pluripara (aOR = 0.58, 95%CI: 0.46–0.74), number of children ≥ 2 (aOR = 0.45, 95%CI: 0.35–0.57), clinical stage of syphilis being primary/secondary/tertiary (aOR = 0.72, 95%CI: 0.58–0.88) or unclear (aOR = 0.78, 95%CI: 0.70–0.86) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Multivariate logistic regression of standardized treatment for pregnancy women with syphilis (standardized treatment = 1, non-standardized treatment = 0).

Characteristics β SE Wald χ2 P value aOR 95%CI
Marital status
 Married 1.00
 Unmarried/divorced/widowed – 0.21 0.11 3.96 0.047 0.81* 0.65–0.99
Parity
 Primipara 1.00
 Pluripara – 0.54 0.12 20.35 0.000 0.58* 0.46–0.74
Abnormal reproductive histories
 Yes 0.14 0.06 6.05 0.014 1.15* 1.03–1.28
 No 1.00
Number of children 194.77 0.000
 0 1.00
 1 0.10 0.12 0.72 0.400 1.11 0.88–1.39
  ≥ 2 – 0.81 0.13 40.06 0.000 0.45* 0.35–0.57
Time of first prenatal care 250.29 0.000
 1–12 weeks of gestation 1.64 0.11 237.15 0.000 5.17* 4.19–6.37
 13–27 weeks of gestation 1.72 0.11 235.51 0.000 5.56* 4.46–6.92
  ≥ 28 weeks of gestation 1.00
Clinical stage of syphilis 30.14 0.000
 Latent syphilis 1.00
 Primary/secondary/tertiary syphilis – 0.33 0.11 10.18 0.001 0.72* 0.58–0.88
 Unclear – 0.25 0.05 23.88 0.000 0.78* 0.70–0.86
Previous syphilis infection
 Yes 0.49 0.05 92.29 0.000 1.64* 1.48–1.81
 No 1.00
Syphilis infection status of sexual partner 127.37 0.000
 Unclear 1.00
 Negative 0.55 0.05 117.35 0.000 1.73* 1.57–1.91
 Positive 0.48 0.10 25.19 0.000 1.62* 1.34–1.95

AOR denotes adjusted odds ratio. CI denotes confidence interval. *P < 0.05.

Discussion

The first-choice antibiotic for syphilis-infected pregnant women was penicillin, and the basic treatment principles were early discovery, and early, sufficient and full-course treatment. The syphilis treatment at the first trimester prevented the embryo from infection, and the treatment at the third trimester cured both the pregnant woman and the infected embryo, so the infected embryo can be cured before labor. Thus, the standardized treatment of gestational syphilis required for sufficient penicillin treatment for 2 courses during the pregnancy and the 2nd course should be conducted and finished at the third trimester. Since the extensive implementation of PMTCT in 2011, except for some developed cities such as Shenzhen19, the standardized treatment rates of gestational syphilis are unfavorable in other cities and are only 44.6–65.1%2,6,20,21. There is still huge gap from the goal of eliminating mother-to-infant syphilis transmission by 95% set up by Worth Health Organization in 201422. After the implementation of national PMTCT in China for 8 years, many studies have been made to report the implementation effects of this project, including the process indexes (prenatal syphilis screening rates, gestational syphilis treatment rates) and effect indexes (congenital syphilis occurrence)2,3,10,20. However, there is no report about the determinants on standardized treatment of gestational syphilis. Results show the facilitators for the standardized syphilis treatment include abnormal reproductive histories, time of first prenatal care < 28 weeks, previous syphilis infection, and definite syphilis infection status of sexual partner (negative or positive). The barriers include marital status being unmarried/divorced/widowed, pluripara, number of child ≥ 2, and clinical stage of syphilis being primary/secondary/tertiary or unclear. A better understanding of syphilis standardized treatment as well as the associated facilitators and barriers will help health care providers to identify high-risk populations and improve syphilis standardized treatment. Moreover, the results can provide scientific evidence for formulating and optimizing intervention strategies against mother-to-child transmission of syphilis.

Due to the implementation of the PMTCT in Hunan, the standardized treatment rate among pregnant women with syphilis was significantly improved from 29.9% in 2015 to 72.9% in 2018. Such improvement is attributed to the huge investment and policy support from the national and provincial governments on PMTCT in the past eight years, including laboratory construction of health facilities, special technical training about intervention measures of PMTCT for health care providers, and free syphilis detection and treatment for all pregnant women23. Although the standardized treatment rate of syphilis-infected pregnant women in Hunan has improved in recent years, the average standardized treatment from 2015 to 2018 is 54.8%, which is similar to that in Zhejiang (54.7%)2 and lower than that in Shenzhen (89.8%)19. Shenzhen is one of the most developed cities of China and is severely attacked by syphilis breakout. To prevent and control congenital syphilis, Shenzhen experimentally implemented PMTCT in the whole city as early as 2002. After 10 years of comprehensive intervention measures and practice, Shenzhen made significant success in PMTCT, as the incidences of congenital syphilis dropped from 115/100,000 live births in 2002 to 10/100,000 live births in 201113. Along with the successful experimental trial in Shenzhen, PMTCT was expanded in 2011 to 1,156 counties in China. Hunan initiated PMTCT as late as 2011 in 21 counties, then extended to 48 counties in 2014 and covered all 123 counties in 2015. Hunan carried out PMTCT 10 years later than Shenzhen and thus lacked experience in organization, management and inter-department cooperation of PMTCT, which moderately hindered the implementation of mother-to-child transmission blocking measures.

During the implementation of PMTCT in China, the health facilities initiatively offered free syphilis serological tests for pregnant women during their first prenatal care. Thus, we find the time of first prenatal care is closely and collinearly correlated with the time of syphilis diagnosis, which explains why only the time of first prenatal care was included into the multivariate logistic regression model. The time of gestational weeks in the first prenatal care was 13.5 weeks on average and was < 28 weeks in 92.1% of the patients. The diagnosis time of gestational syphilis was 19.0 weeks on average and was < 28 weeks in 68.9% of the patients, but was intrapartum or postpartum in 25.6% of the patients. Though the prenatal care rates in the first and second trimesters were high, the syphilis diagnosis rates in these two trimesters were lower, which was mostly because the pregnant women deliberately hid the disease and rejected syphilis detection during the prenatal care. This study shows that the time of first prenatal care is a key factor deciding the standardized treatment of syphilis-infected pregnant women, and the probabilities of receiving syphilis standardized treatment during the first prenatal care in the first and second trimesters are 5.17 and 5.56 times of those in the third trimester, respectively. Similarly, qualitative studies in Congo and Zambia demonstrated that the belated time of first prenatal care was a major factor that hindered the detection and treatment of syphilis in pregnant women17. A retrospective study in South Africa showed that the compliance with benzathine penicillin treatment for syphilis during pregnancy was significantly associated with the time of first prenatal care visit, and that women without treatment presented 3–4 weeks later on average for their first visit than those women receiving complete treatment24. The standardized treatment of gestational syphilis should be finished by using 2 courses of sufficient penicillin, and the two courses should both last 15 days or 3 weeks, and be separated by at least 2 weeks. Thus, those who received syphilis screening only in the third trimester, especially intrapartum, cannot complete 2 courses of syphilis treatment. Health care providers should strengthen social propaganda and health education on mother-to-child transmission of syphilis, increase the syphilis screening rates of pregnant women in the first and second trimesters, and diagnose syphilis infection as soon as possible to further improve the standardized treatment rate of gestational syphilis.

Gestational syphilis management also requires for syphilis detection over the sexual partners of syphilis-infected pregnant women. If syphilis infection of sexual partners is confirmed, a prompt and standardized treatment is needed to prevent the pregnant women from repeated infection. In this study, the syphilis infection status is unclear in up to 62.1% of the sexual partners, indicating the notification and syphilis detection rates among the sexual partners of syphilic pregnant women are low. Fear of domestic violence among pregnant women, poor communication between partners, and syphilis-related stigma were the possible barriers for their partner notification and detection for syphilis25. The pregnant women whose sexual partners had definite syphilis infection status may have strong consciousness of prenatal care and can fully understand the importance of notifying the sexual partners, and get enough family support, so their standardized treatment rates are high. The syphilis-infected pregnant women with abnormal reproductive histories feared of infecting their embryos and of having adverse pregnancy outcomes again, so their standardized treatment rates were high. On the contrary, multiparas, or women already having ≥ 2 children may have already had healthy children, and they were not very desiring to protect the fetuses from infection, which led to the very low rate of standardized treatment among them. The pregnant women with syphilis being unmarried/ divorced/widowed may lack social and family support and may have stigma, so the standardized treatment rate was low among them.

In this study, 30.0% of the pregnant women with syphilis had a previous syphilis infection, and 70.0% of them were infected for the first time. The knowledge rates of syphilis-caused health hazards, detection and treatment, and the detection and treatment compliance rates are high among those with a previous syphilis infection, which account for the high standardized treatment rate among them. Gestational syphilis is dominated by latent infection, without showing any clinical symptom, and can be identified by routine prenatal serological tests18. Our study shows the standardized treatment rates differ among patients at different clinical stages of syphilis. The main symptom of primary syphilis is small and painless lesions, called chancres, in areas of sexual contact. Because chancres are painless and disappear spontaneously, many pregnant women do not seek treatment. Moreover, the secondary syphilis and tertiary syphilis inherently result from the untreatment or non-standardized treatment of primary syphilis or early syphilis26.

This study has some limitations. First, the data were obtained from IPMTCT in Hunan, which is a passive surveillance system. Since data collection on maternal syphilis is completely dependent on health facility reporting, our study may be biased by a high proportion of unclear data (missing data) on some important factors, such as clinical stage of syphilis and syphilis infection status of sexual partner. Second, syphilis infection was diagnosed as being positive in both NTPAS tests and TPAS tests. However, a few pregnant women with previous syphilis infection may have syphilis serum-resistance, their serum titers of NTPAS tests are maintained at low levels (≤ 1:8) for a long time (even for life)18, which will be lead to a diagnosis bias for current syphilis infection. Third, due to data limitation, the determinants of gestational syphilis standardized treatment considered here only include patient-level factors, but exclude the factors at the health system level or health care provider level. Two qualitative studies in Africa found that the key barriers against implementation of syphilis testing and treatment were fragmentation of the health system and low accessibility of health care service (geographical and functional) in the health system level, and lack of knowledge and training about evolving best syphilis practices in health care providers17,27. Thus, some key factors related to gestational syphilis standardized treatment may have not been found, which largely restrains the improvement of gestational syphilis standardized treatment rates in Hunan. Fourth, the 2015 National PMTCT Guidelines specifically requested that during the gestational syphilis therapeutic process, if the NTPAS test showed titer rise or the result changed from "negative" to "positive", it was judged as reoccurrence or reinfection and 1 new course of treatment should be supplemented23. Since the patients with reoccurrence or reinfection totally need 3 courses of penicillin treatment, the requirements to their standardized treatment are different from regular pregnant women with syphilis. However, since the reoccurrence or reinfection of gestational syphilis was not excluded in our study, the rate of standardized treatment among pregnant women with syphilis may be overestimated.

Conclusions

Though the treatment rate of syphilis-infected pregnant women was high, the syphilis standardized treatment rate was low. The facilitators and barriers on standardized treatment of gestational syphilis were identified at the patient level. Further studies should be expanded to the determinants on standardized treatment of gestational syphilis at the health system level and the health care provider level.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all researchers from the midwifery hospitals in Hunan province. The study was funded by a Project of Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation (No. 2020JJ5285), and the major Project of Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Department (No. 2019SK1015).

Author contributions

Z.L. and H.L. designed the study. J.T., J.Z., G.H., J.X. and N.F. collected the data. H.L., J.Z. and Q.H. conducted the statistical analysis and interpretation. H.L. and J.T. wrote the paper. Z.L. and G.H. revised the paper. All the authors reviewed the paper and approved the final version.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to the personal privacy of subjects but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Hong FC, et al. Congenital syphilis: an economic evaluation of a prevention program in China. Sex Transm. Dis. 2010;37:26–31. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181b3915b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhang XH, Xu J, Chen DQ, Guo LF, Qiu LQ. Effectiveness of treatment to improve pregnancy outcomes among women with syphilis in Zhejiang Province, China. Sex Transm. Infect. 2016;92:537–541. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2015-052363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Li Y, et al. Effects on preventing mother-to-child transmission of syphilis and associated adverse pregnant outcomes: a longitudinal study from 2001 to 2015 in Shanghai, China. BMC Infect. Dis. 2017;17:626. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2721-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kassa D, et al. Prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (HIV, hepatitis B virus, herpes simplex virus type 2, and syphilis) in pregnant women in Ethiopia: trends over 10 years (2005–2014) Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2019;79:50–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ormaeche M, Whittembury A, Pun M, Suárez-Ognio L. Hepatitis B virus, syphilis, and HIV seroprevalence in pregnant women and their male partnersfrom six indigenous populations of the Peruvian Amazon Basin, 2007–2008. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2012;16:e724–730. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2012.05.1032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dou L, et al. Epidemic profile of maternal syphilis in China in 2013. Biomed. Res. Int. 2016;2016:9194805. doi: 10.1155/2016/9194805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Qin JB, et al. Reported estimates of adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with and without syphilis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e102203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Qin JB, et al. Risk factors for congenital syphilis and adverse pregnancy outcomes in offspring of women with syphilis in Shenzhen, China: a prospective nested case-control study. Sex Transm. Dis. 2014;41:13–23. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gomez GB, et al. Untreated maternal syphilis and adverse outcomes of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91:217–226. doi: 10.2471/BLT.12.107623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wu Y, et al. Mother-to-child transmission prevention of human immunodeficiency virus, syphilis and hepatitis B virus. Women Birth. 2018 doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dou LX, et al. Serologic surveillance indicators analysis among syphilis-infected pregnant women in East China. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018;52:68–72. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2018.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wang A, Xiao Y, Xiong L, Hua X, Liu Z. Testing results of AIDS, syphilis and hepatitis B among pregnant women in Hunan Province, 2011–2015. Shi Yong Yu Fang Yi Xue. 2017;24:833–835. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hong FC, et al. Reduction in mother-to-child transmission of syphilis for 10 years in Shenzhen, China. Sex Transm. Dis. 2014;41:188–193. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hong FC, et al. Risk of congenital syphilis (CS) following treatment of maternal syphilis: results of a CS control program in China. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2017;65:588–594. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Torres RG, et al. Syphilis in pregnancy: the reality in a public hospital. Rev. Bras. Ginecol. Obstet. 2019;41:90–96. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Li HX, et al. Association between maternal syphilis treatment and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Zhonghua Chuan Ran Bing Za Zhi. 2019;37:21–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nkamba D, et al. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of antenatal syphilis screening and treatment for the prevention of congenital syphilis in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Zambia: results of qualitative formative research. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2017;17:556. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2494-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang LH. Technical Guide for Prevention and Treatment of Syphilis in Pregnancy and Congenital Syphilis. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wu X, et al. Contact tracing of pregnant women infected with syphilis and the associated factors. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2015;49:1067–1072. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhang X, et al. Surveillance of maternal syphilis in China: pregnancy outcomes and determinants of congenital syphilis. Med. Sci. Monit. 2018;24:7727–7735. doi: 10.12659/MSM.910216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gong T, et al. Treatment evaluation to improve preventing mother to child transmission among women with syphilis. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:19547. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56095-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Global guidance on criteria and processes for validation. Elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and syphilis. Geneva (2014). https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/112858/112851/9789241505888_eng.pdf. Accessed 6 Aug 2018.
  • 23.NHFPC. Implementation plan for the prevention of HIV/AIDS, syphilis and hepatitis B mother-to-child transmission (2015 edition). https://www.nhfpc.gov.cn/zwgkzt/wsbysj/201102/250740.shtml. Accessed 9 Apr 2015. (in Chinese)
  • 24.Mullick S, Beksinksa M, Msomi S. Treatment for syphilis in antenatal care: compliance with the three dose standard treatment regimen. Sex Transm. Infect. 2005;81:220–222. doi: 10.1136/sti.2004.011999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nakku-Joloba E, et al. Perspectives on male partner notification and treatment for syphilis among antenatal women and their partners in Kampala and Wakiso districts, Uganda. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019;19:124. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-3695-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shen K, Ma D. Obstetrics and Gynecology (Third Edition) Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bocoum FY, Kouanda S, Zarowsky C. Barriers to antenatal syphilis screening in Burkina Faso. Pan. Afr. Med. J. 2014;17(Suppl 1):12. doi: 10.11694/pamj.supp.2014.17.1.3423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to the personal privacy of subjects but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES