Skip to main content
Epidemiology and Infection logoLink to Epidemiology and Infection
. 2020 May 22;148:e148. doi: 10.1017/S0950268820001144

Candida meningitis in neurosurgical patients: a single-institute study of nine cases over 7 years

Mantao Chen 1, Chongchao Chen 2, Qing Yang 2, Renya Zhan 1,
PMCID: PMC7374802  PMID: 32438931

Abstract

Candida meningitis in neurosurgical patients is relatively unusual but is associated with a high mortality rate. We present our experience with this infection and discuss the clinical characteristics, treatment options and outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed neurosurgical patients with multiple positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture results in our hospital from January 2013 to December 2019. Nine patients were available for review according to our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Four species of Candida were isolated from the CSF samples and Candida albicans accounted for half of all infections. Eight infections were associated with ventricle peritoneal shunt, lumbar cistern peritoneal shunt or external ventricular drain. All of these foreign intracranial materials were removed or changed and all the patients received antifungal treatment, including fluconazole and/or voriconazole. It is associated with severe long-term outcomes in survivors and a mortality rate that reaches 11.1%. Prior treatments with broad-spectrum and high-grade antibiotics and anaemia are possible risk factors for Candida meningitis. We advise that foreign intracranial material should be removed or changed as early as possible and the timing of re-shunt operation can be 1 month after control of Candida meningitis has been achieved, with several negative CSF culture results.

Key words: Candida, meningitis, neurosurgery, risk factor, therapy

Introduction

While it is estimated that 1.5 million fungal species exist, only approximately 70 000 have been formally described. Among the described species, 300 may be pathogenic in humans and only 10–15% of this influence the central nervous system (CNS) [1, 2]. Fungal CNS infections can be broadly divided into those that infect a healthy host (Cryptococcus, Coccidioides, Histoplasma, Blastomyces, Sporothrix spp.) and those that cause opportunistic infections in an immunocompromised host (Candida, Aspergillus, Zygomycetes, Trichosporon spp.) [1, 3]. The incidence of fungal infections of the CNS has been increasing. CNS fungal infections can present as meningitis, meningoencephalitis, brain abscesses, or stroke syndrome due to vascular invasion [4, 5]. Based on the hospital discharge data, fungal infections accounted for 2.7% of cases of meningoencephalitis in the USA between 2011 and 2014 [6].

Greater numbers of fungal infections are observed among patients belonging to high-risk groups, such as HIV-infected persons, AIDS patients, transplant recipients and immunosuppressed patients treated with chemotherapeutics or corticosteroids, as well as among those suffering from haematological disorders and in patients with chronic diseases [710]. Different patient populations are at risk for different species of fungal infections of the CNS [11]. In addition to immunosuppressed individuals, neurosurgical patients are also at risk for fungal infections of the CNS. Although rare, Candida spp. and Cryptococcus spp. infections have been reported as well as ventriculo-peritoneal shunt infections caused by H. capsulatum and Coccidioides immitis [4, 12, 13]. Candida meningitis in neurosurgical patients has rarely been described [1416]. When amphotericin B (AmB) combined with or without flucytosine and fluconazole was used as antifungal therapy, the mortality rate of Candida meningitis in neurosurgical patients was 11%, 33% and 27%, respectively [1416]. The emerging importance of Candida as a nosocomial pathogen prompted us to review CNS infections caused by Candida spp. following neurosurgery in our institution and to examine the clinical characteristics, treatments and outcomes in this cohort of patients.

Material and methods

We retrospectively reviewed all the culture records from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in our hospital from January 2013 to December 2019. Patients with neurological diseases, who needed neurosurgical intervention, with clinical symptoms of CNS infection and positivity of at least two CSF cultures for Candida species were included in the study. Patients without signs and symptoms suggestive for meningitis and with meningitis from fungi other than Candida were excluded. We reviewed the basic information of each patient, including age, sex, brain diseases, neurosurgical history, antecedent infections and antibiotics. In addition, we collected the risk factors for the development of CNS candidiasis, such as diabetes, immunosuppression, albumin (normal arrange 35–55 g/l) and haemoglobin (normal arrange 131–172 g/l). Clinical data of antifungal therapy and outcomes were collected for each patient in a specific file. Patients without a regular clinical follow-up were called by phone. We also followed up the re-shunt in patients with hydrocephalus. The follow-up duration was 6 months after the last candidiasis episode. Continuous variables were reported as the median and range, while categorical variables were reported as frequencies and percentages. Data analysis was performed in Excel 16.0 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA).

Results

We collected 1348 positive culture samples of CSF in our institution in the recent 7-year study period and 70 samples were fungal infection. There were 24 patients with 54 CSF culture samples for Candida. Other 16 fungus cultures were Cryptococcus, Rhodotorula mucilaginosa and Aspergillus. In the series of 24 patients with Candida in CSF cultures, two patients had no history of neurosurgery and seven patients had no signs and symptoms of meningitis. Four patients were considered as bacterial meningitis and one patient as Nocardia meningitis without antifungal therapy. One patient with once Candida culture was treated with fluconazole for 3 days and transferred to a local hospital. Eventually, nine patients were available for further review according to our inclusion and exclusion criteria. The clinical data of these patients are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Demographic data, clinical characteristics and outcome in nine cases of Candida meningitis

Patient no. Age/Sex Brain disease Neurosurgical history History of other diseases Glucocorticoid Antecedent infection Antibiotics Species Disseminated candidiasis Albumin(g/L) Haemoglobin(g/L) Treatment Antifungal agent Outcome
1 48/M Trauma Haematoma clearance, VP, draining of subdural effusion Hypertension No Pulmonary Sulperazone Candida parapsilosis, Candida famata None 40.9 85 Shunt removement, external ventricular drainage, lumbar drainage Fluconazole, Voriconazole Survived
2 72/M Glioma Tumour resection Hypertension Yes Brain Ceftazidime, vancomycin Candida parapsilosis None 34 126 Lumbar drainage Fluconazole Survived
3 7/M Trauma Haematoma clearance, CSF leakage repair, external ventricular drainage, lumbar drainage None NK Brain, pulmonary NK Candida albicans, Candida famata None 39.5 134 Lumbar puncture Fluconazole Survived
4 70/M Trauma Haematoma clearance, lumbar drainage Hypertension No Brain, pulmonary Linezolid, meropenem Candida albicans None 37.1 77 Lumbar drainage Fluconazole,Voriconazole Death
5 51/M Trauma Haematoma clearance, lumbar drainage None Yes Brain, pulmonary Linezolid, meropenem Candida albicans Pulmonary (Candida albicans, Candida glabrate) 36.3 79 Lumbar drainage, craniotomy for infection clearance and CSF leakage repair Fluconazole Survived
6 38/M Trauma Haematoma clearance, CSF leakage repair, lumbar drainage None Yes Brain, pulmonary Linezolid, meropenem, tigecycline Candida albicans None 37.2 60 Lumbar drainage Fluconazole Survived
7 67/M Trauma Haematoma clearance, VP Hypertension No Brain, pulmonary Linezolid, meropenem, Candida parapsilosis Pulmonary (Candida albicans) 35.6 87 Shunt removement, lumbar drainage Fluconazole, Voriconazole Survived
8 46/F Trauma Haematoma clearance, LP Diabetes No Brain, pulmonary, urinary Meropenem, ciprofloxacin Candida albicans None 38.3 143 Shunt removement, external ventricular drainage, lumbar drainage Fluconazole Survived
9 73/M Heamorrhage Haematoma clearance, debridement, external ventricular drainage Hypertension No Brain, pulmonary Linezolid, meropenem, Candida glabrata None 32.7 86 Lumbar drainage Voriconazole Survived

NK, not known.

In our series, seven cases of brain trauma and one case of cerebellar haemorrhage underwent emergency craniotomy for the clearance of intracranial haematoma, while only one glioma patient underwent elective surgery for intracranial tumour resection. All the patients suffered postoperative infections in the brain, pulmonary system, or urinary system and all of them received one or multiple classes of antibiotics. In our study, four species of Candida were isolated from the CSF samples and Candida albicans accounted for half. Eight infections were associated with foreign intracranial materials: two with a ventricle peritoneal shunt (VPS), one with a lumbar cistern peritoneal shunt (LPS), one with an external ventricular drain (EVD) and four with a lumbar drain. All foreign intracranial materials were removed or changed and all patients received antifungal agents, including fluconazole and/or voriconazole. Only one patient died after receiving invasive treatment and antifungal agents, with a mortality of 11.1%. In our series, three patients (patient 1, 5 and 8) received the re-shunt for hydrocephalus. Both patient 1 and 8 underwent operations to place shunts operation 1 month after the control of Candida meningitis was achieved. Meanwhile, six and five negative CSF cultures were observed, respectively. The follow-up of these two patients were favourable. However, patient 5, who was placed an LPS 2 weeks after the control of Candida meningitis with three negative cultures, suffered the infection of Candida again. Through removing of the LPS and standard therapy with fluconazole, this patient received the operation of VPS 1 month after the control of Candida meningitis with three negative CSF results and cultures.

Our study also collected data of other risk factors for the development of CNS candidiasis. Only one patient had diabetes and three received the therapy of glucocorticoid in the recent 1 month before CNS candidiasis. The median of malnutrition indicator albumin in our series was 37.1 g/l and only two patients were lower than the normal level. Meanwhile, 77.8% of patients suffered from anaemia and six patients reached a moderate level, with a median haemoglobin value of 86 g/l.

Discussion

The pathogenesis of fungal CNS infections has not been fully described. However, the penetration of fungi across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is the most probable mechanism responsible for Candida meningitis. Three mechanisms by which pathogens cross the BBB have been described: transcellular migration, paracellular migration and the Trojan horse mechanism [17, 18]. The BBB is formed by brain endothelial cells, which are connected by tight junctions and surrounded by astrocyte foot processes that maintain the integrity of the BBB. Fungal cells can be trapped by vascular constriction with possible sensing and signalling of both cell types. Fungal cells can be internalised within a host cell (Trojan horse) that makes contact with the endothelium, arrest and generates sensing and signalling of all three cell types. This is followed by transmigration that could be via the trans- or paracellular mechanism. Immune and inflammatory cells are recruited to the vascular or extracellular compartment as part of the host defence and inflammatory response [19]. In our opinion, the BBB is directly disrupted by neurosurgery and the reduction in immunity after neurosurgery increases the permeability of the BBB. These factors facilitate the penetration of fungi into the brain and lead to fungal infection of the CNS. In addition, the colonisation of a foreign device may also represent a reason for the infection when the device is inside brain ventricles.

Due to the development of nonculture-based diagnostic techniques, which allow more sensitive and rapid identification of fungi, the incidence of fungal infections of the CNS has been increasing. However, Candida meningitis in neurosurgical patients has rarely been described. It is important to note that Candida albicans is commonly isolated from both immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients, but its prevalence has begun to decrease over the past decade, while the frequency of detection of non-C. albicans species has gradually increased. It should be noted that the incidence of Candida spp. has increased from 6 to 17% in fungal infections of the CNS [9]. Before the 21th century, Nguyen and Yu (1995) reviewed three of their own cases of neurosurgery-related Candida meningitis and 15 cases previously reported in the English-language literature. They found that most patients with Candida meningitis had recently received antibacterial agents and it is notable that 50% of patients suffered from antecedent bacterial meningitis. In addition, the overall mortality rate in those 18 patients was 11% [14]. Another retrospective study by Geers and Gordon (1999) reviewed 48 Candida isolates cultured from CSF samples from 21 post-neurosurgery patients. C. albicans was isolated from 48% of the patients. Bacterial meningitis appears to be associated with the development of Candida meningitis and preceded Candida meningitis in 63% of cases. The overall mortality rate associated with Candida meningitis in adult patients following neurosurgery was 27%. The mortality rate among our post-neurosurgery patients with clinically significant Candida meningitis (excluding those not treated with antifungal agents) was 33% [15]. After the 21th century, O'Brien et al. (2011) reported 11 cases of Candida CSF infection after neurosurgery over a 12-year period. In total, 73% of the isolates were C. albicans and 73% of the patients had antecedent bacterial meningitis. All infections were associated with foreign intracranial material, including EVD, VPS, lumbar drain and Gliadel wafers, with a mortality rate of 27% [16]. In our study, all nine patients contracted postoperative infections and eight patients had an intracranial bacterial infection before developing Candida meningitis. These patients received multiple classes of antibiotics due to multidrug-resistant bacteria, multiple bacterial infections and multisystem infections. These broad-spectrum and high-grade antibiotics prompted the development of fungal infections. In addition, only one patient died after receiving invasive treatment and antifungal agents. The mortality rate was 11.1%, which was lower than that in the previous studies.

In the previous studies, the post-craniotomy intracranial Candida infection was associated with prior use of antibacterial agents and foreign intracranial materials such as VPS, LPS, EVD and Gliadel wafers [1416, 20]. There was the same result in our study. The susceptible populations for Candida spp. infection include patients with neutropenia, solid organ transplants, corticosteroids, autoimmune disorders and neurosurgery [11]. Besides, diabetes mellitus is a risk factor of intracranial infection for neurosurgery [21]. Our study did not get the same results for corticosteroids and diabetes mellitus due to the small populations. Dunne et al. (2002) found perioperative anaemia was an independent risk factor for infection and mortality in surgery [22]. We found 77.8% of patients suffered from anaemia, suggesting anaemia as a possible association with Candida infection.

Due to the low morbidity of Candida meningitis, no randomised controlled trials have been performed to evaluate the most appropriate treatment; only single case reports and small series exist. In our study, all patients were treated with fluconazole and/or voriconazole. A total of 88.9% of patients survived after treatment. Most reports have demonstrated the use of AmB with or without flucytosine [15]. AmB is a polyene antifungal agent with activity against all Candida spp. of clinical importance; evidence supports the use of AmB for CNS infections [23]. 5-Flucytosine possesses excellent penetration into the CSF and has activity against most clinically important fungi, but its toxicity precludes its widespread use. Human studies have also demonstrated the excellent penetration of fluconazole into the CNS; however, intrinsic resistance to this azole is present in certain Candida species, e.g. Candida glabrata, which limits its usefulness as a first-line agent [24]. According to the clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis by the Infectious Diseases Society of America updated in 2016, liposomal AmB (AmB, 5 mg/kg daily) with or without oral flucytosine (25 mg/kg 4 times daily) is strongly recommended as the initial therapy. However, the optimal length of initial therapy has not been studied. Fluconazole has proven useful as a step-down therapy at a dosage of 400–800 mg (6–12 mg/kg) daily due to its excellent levels in the CSF and brain tissue. The indication for the cessation of therapy is when all signs, symptoms and CSF and radiological abnormalities have resolved [25].

Not only case reports but also the small series strongly recommended removing implanted devices from patients with Candida infections [14, 16, 20], guidelines suggest that infected CNS devices, including ventriculostomy drains, shunts, stimulators, prosthetic reconstructive devices and biopolymer wafers that deliver chemotherapy, should be removed if possible [25]. All of these foreign intracranial materials were removed or changed in our study. However, three patients with VPS or LPS received antifungal agents, repeated lumbar puncture and even lumber drainage or external ventricular drainage, in the beginning to attempt to retain the shunt. The failure of therapy prompted us to remove the shunt. Therefore, we advise removing or changing foreign intracranial materials as early as possible.

The timing of replacing the shunt in patients with hydrocephalus is not clear yet. Both patient 1 and 8, achieved success in the re-shunt 1 month after the control of Candida meningitis with more than five negative CSF cultures. While patient 5 failed in the LPS operation 2 weeks after the control of Candida meningitis with three negative culture results. This patient received the operation of VPS 1 month after the control of Candida meningitis with three negative CSF results and cultures. Hence, we advise that the operation to replace a removed shunt can take place 1 month after controlling the Candida meningitis, with several negative CSF culture results. Due to the lack of cases and clinical therapy experiences, the timing of replacing the shunt in patients with hydrocephalus requires further research.

Conclusions

The mortality of Candida meningitis in neurosurgical patients is high. An antecedent infection, especially bacterial meningitis, with broad-spectrum antibiotics and high-grade antibiotics and anaemia are possible high-risk factors for Candida meningitis. Early diagnosis with CSF culture and early treatment with antifungal agents is beneficial for patients, while foreign intracranial material, such as VPS, LPS and EVD, should be removed or changed as early as possible. We advise that the operation to replace the removed shunt can take place 1 month after controlling the Candida meningitis, with several negative CSF culture results.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LQ20H160040) and Medicine and Health Technology Projects of Zhejiang Province (NO. 2018ZH009).

Conflict of interest

None

References

  • 1.Sharma RR (2010) Fungal infections of the nervous system: current perspective and controversies in management. International Journal of Surgery 8, 591–601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Köhler JR, Casadevall A and Perfect J (2015) The spectrum of fungi that infects humans. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine 5, a019273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Redmond A, Dancer C and Woods ML (2007) Fungal infections of the central nervous system: a review of fungal pathogens and treatment. Neurology India 55, 251–259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Scully EP, Baden LR and Katz JT (2008) Fungal brain infections. Current Opinion in Neurology 1, 347–352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Raparia K et al. (2010) Cerebral mycosis: 7-year retrospective series in a tertiary center. Neuropathology: Official Journal of the Japanese Society of Neuropathology 30, 218–223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hasbun R et al. (2017) Epidemiology of meningitis and encephalitis in the United States, 2011–2014. Clinical Infectious Diseases 65, 359–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Murthy JMK and Sundaram C (2014) Fungal infections of the central nervous system. Handbook of Clinical Neurology 121, 1383–1401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bongomin F et al. (2017) Global and multi-national prevalence of fungal diseases-estimate precision. Journal of Fungi 3, 57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Brumble LM et al. (2017) Fungal infections of the central nervous system: clinical, radiographic and laboratory manifestations. Journal of Microbiology & Experimentation 5, 00167. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gavito-Higuera J et al. (2016) Fungal infections of the central nervous system: a pictorial review. Journal of Clinical Imaging Science 6, 24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kourbeti IS and Mylonakis E (2014) Fungal central nervous system infections: prevalence and diagnosis. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy 12, 265–273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Agarwal R et al. (2010) Spectrum of fungal infection in a neurology tertiary care center in India. Neurological Sciences 33, 1305–1310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ranganath S et al. (2012) Clinical and laboratory diagnosis of central nervous system histoplasmosis. The American Journal of Medicine 125, e1–e2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nguyen MH and Yu VL (1995) Meningitis caused by Candida species: an emerging problem in neurosurgical patients. Clinical Infectious Diseases 21, 323–327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Geers TA and Gordon SM (1999) Clinical significance of Candida species isolated from cerebrospinal fluid following neurosurgery. Clinical Infectious Diseases 28, 1139–1147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.O'Brien D et al. (2011) Candida infection of the central nervous system following neurosurgery: a 12-year review. Acta Neurochirurgica 153, 1347–1350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sharma RR et al. (2012) Fungal infections of the central nervous system In Quinones-Hinojosa A (ed.), Schmidek and Sweet: Operative Neurosurgical Techniques. Philadelphia: Saunders, pp. 1691–1732. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Koutsouras GW, Ramos RL and Martinez LR (2017) Role of microglia in fungal infections of the central nervous system. Virulence 8, 705–718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Shi M and Mody CH (2016) Fungal infection in the brain: what we learned from intravital imaging. Frontiers in Immunology 7, 292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bhalla GS et al. (2018) Device-associated central nervous system infection caused by Candida parapsilosis. Cureus 10, e3140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kaisorn L et al. (2015) Risk of surgical site infection in 401 consecutive patients with glioblastoma with and without carmustine wafer implantation. Neurological Research 37, 717–726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dunne JR et al. (2002) Perioperative anemia: an independent risk factor for infection, mortality, and resource utilization in surgery. Journal of Surgical Research 102, 237–244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kethiderry S and Andes D (2007) CNS Pharmacokinetics of antifungal agents. Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology 3, 573–581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tucker RMP et al. (1998) Pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in cerebrospinal fluid and serum in human coccidioidal meningitis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 32, 369–373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pappas PG et al. (2016) Clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis: 2016 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clinical Infectious Diseases 62, e1–e50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Epidemiology and Infection are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES