Abstract
Background
Plasma of patients taking anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) leads to panagglutination in the indirect antiglobulin test (IAT), that can mask clinically significant alloantibodies. Dithiothreitol (DTT) treatment of test RBCs is the more widespread method for avoiding this interference. Current DTT 0.2 mol/L method is time consuming and damages several red blood groups antigens. This study aims to evaluate low concentration DTT treatment of RBCs adapted for gel testing.
Materials and methods
Four DTT concentrations (0.01, 0.02, 0.03, and 0.04 mol/L), and three gel test brands were evaluated on six DARA patient’s samples. Briefly, the method consists of pipetting 50 μL of 0.8% RBCs on AHG micro columns, followed by 25 μL of DTT, thoroughly mixing and 15 min incubation at 37 °C. Then, 25 μL of serum/plasma is added to proceed to IAT. In order to asses the effect of DTT 0.04 mol/L on different blood group antigens, serial dilutions of sera containing anti-K, -k, -Kpb, -Lub, -Yta and anti-JMH antibodies were tested against DTT-RBCs. One sample of a DARA patient with known alloantibodies as well as samples of two patients inoculated with anti-K and anti-Fya were evaluated.
Results
RBCs treatment with DTT 0.04 mol/L for 15 min completely eliminated anti CD38 panagglutination in all samples studied and worked with different reactivity intensities in IAT and gel brands. The new method allowed the detection of underlying anti-D, anti-E, anti-K and anti-Fya alloantibodies. Titration assays demonstrated no denaturation of Kell, Lutheran, Cartwright and JMH antigens.
Discussion
The new DTT method adapted for gel testing is efficacious, simple and only adds 15 min over regular IAT. Pheno/genotyping before DARA treatment or transfusion of K negative RBCs may be unnecessary.
Keywords: daratumumab, panagglutination, anti-CD38, DTT, gel test
INTRODUCTION
Plasma of patients taking an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody ( MoAb) as a treatment for multiple myeloma (MM) causes panagglutination in the indirect antiglobulin test ( IAT) that can mask clinically significant alloantibodies. This is an important issue for patients that need blood transfusions since it produces a delay in releasing red blood cells ( RBC). With an increasing number of patients being treated with these types of drugs, it is important to find the best way to avoid this interference.
CD38 is a glycoprotein found on the cellular surface of many tissues, as well as haematopoietic and immune system cells. It is also weakly expressed on normal RBC membranes. Anti-CD38 MoAbs bind cross-linked to test RBCs and cause panagglutination in IAT1. This pan reactivity can not be removed by regular adsorption/elution techniques1. There are several theoretical approaches for eliminating the interference in IAT1–7, but up till now, the majority of transfusion services have used the Dithiothreitol (DTT) method.
Dithiothreitol, a reducing compound, denatures CD38 by cleaving the disulphide bonds1. As a consequence, DTT damages CD38 proteins but also other RBC antigens, resulting in the failure to detect antibodies against clinically relevant blood group systems that include: Kell, Lutheran, JMH, LW, Cromer, Indian, Knops, Dombrock, Cartwright, and Raph8.
A detailed method for the treatment of RBCs with DTT is described in the American Association of Blood Banks (AABB) Technical Manual9. Around two hours are needed to complete pre-transfusion testing with DTT-treated RBCs. Given this, we can conclude that, although DTT is effective, it is time-consuming and may miss some important alloantibodies.
Recently, Hosokawa et al.4 made an important contribution to the field. By reducing the concentration of DTT from 0.2 mol/L to 0.01mol/L, and employing an IAT tube technique with an automated cell washing centrifuge, they reduced the time needed to complete the antibody screening and cross-match to around 60 min. In addition, this approach also reduces the denaturation of K antigen.
Worldwide, most blood transfusion services rely on gel testing and no longer use tube techniques or cell washing centrifuges in their routine procedures. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate a DTT technique to mitigate the panagglutination produced by anti-CD38 MoAbs therapy, adapted for gel-based IAT.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Blood samples of six patients under daratumumab (DARA) therapy, submitted to our laboratory for compatibility workup, were included in the study. All samples were tested according to our routine IAT with 0.2 mol/L DTT-treated RBCs. For the study group, four different concentrations of DTT (0.01, 0.02, 0.03 and 0.04 mol/L) and three incubation times of RBCs with DTT at 37 °C (15, 30 and 40 min) were assayed. All sera/plasma samples were also tested using three different brands of gel test cards.
Dithiothreitol treatment of red blood cells
One gram of DTT (Fisher Scientific, Merelbeke, Belgium) was diluted in 32 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) pH 8.0, to obtain DTT 0.2 mol/L. Aliquots of 2 mL were stocked at −20 °C until needed. Blood plasma/serum samples were submitted to standard gel IAT with 0.2 mol/L DTT-treated RBCs according to the method described in the AABB Technical Manual9. Briefly, this involves mixing one volume of PBS washed RBCs with four volumes of 0.2 mol/L DTT at pH 8.0, followed by incubation at 37 °C for 30–45 min. RBCs and DTT solution are manually mixed 4–5 times during incubation. After DTT treatment, RBCs are washed four times with PBS at pH 7.0, and packed. DTT-treated RBCs are then diluted to 3–5% or 0.8% with PBS, before undergoing IAT. All samples included in this study were tested in parallel following the new method. The new method consists of treating test RBCs with low DTT concentrations directly in gel columns. RBCs along with DTT were incubated for 15–40 min at 37 °C. RBCs are not washed with PBS after DTT treatment. Plasma/serum is added to micro-columns immediately after DTT treatment to start the IAT.
Indirect antiglobulin test methods
Serum/plasma samples were screened for the presence of irregular antibodies using commercial RBC panels of 3–4 cells: ID-Diacell I-II-II (BioRad, DiaMed GmbH, Cressier FR, Switzerland), Serascan Diana 4 (Diagnostic Grifols S.A., Barcelona, Spain), and Across Gel® Cell Screen 4 (DiaPro, Istanbul, Turkey). For auto-control and cross-match RBC preparation, the corresponding LISS were used: ID Diluent 2 (BioRad, DiaMed GmbH), DG Gel Sol (Diagnostic Grifols S.A), and Across LISS Gel (DiaPro). Anti_Human Globulin (AHG) gel test cards of three different brands were used: Liss/Coombs ID Cards (BioRad, DiaMed GmbH), Anti-Human Globulin DG Gel 8 Anti-IgG (Rabbit) (Diagnostic Grifols S.A.), and Across Gel® AHG IgG+C3d (DiaPro).
Low DTT concentrations (0.01, 0.02, 0.03 and 0.04 mol/L) were prepared by diluting DTT 0.2 mol/L stock solution with PBS at pH 7.0.
New dithiothreitol method procedure
The new method consists of pipetting 50 μL of 0.8% test RBCs to every AHG card micro-column, followed by the addition of 25 μL of low concentration DTT (0.01, 0.02, 0.03 or 0.04 mol/L) directly to the micro-column top. As a dilution factor control, in one micro-column we put 25 μL of PBS instead of DTT. After carefully mixing RBCs and DTT or PBS five times with the pipette tip, AHG cards are incubated at 37 °C for 15–30 min. Finally, 25 μL of plasma/serum is added, mixed thoroughly five times, and incubated for 15 min at 37 °C, followed by standard centrifugation and reading. Agglutination grading from 1+ to 4+ was used10.
In order to assess the impact of this technique on DTT-sensitive blood groups, different concentrations of DTT were added to every IAT run, and three different antisera (anti-k, anti Kpb and anti-Lub) were assayed in parallel to patients’ sera.
Moreover, serial dilutions of commercial anti-k, anti-Kpb, anti Lub and patients’ sera with anti-K, anti-Yta, and anti-JMH alloantibodies were tested against RBCs treated with the highest DTT concentration assayed in this study (0.04 mL/L).
In order to demonstrate the ability of the new method to detect underlying alloantibodies, a serum sample of a patient on DARA therapy containing alloantibodies was included. Two more samples of patients under DARA treatment were inoculated with one specimen containing high-titre anti-K plus anti-Fya. Two DARA patients’ samples were also inoculated with a serum specimen containing high-titre anti-K. Briefly, one volume of serum with known alloantibodies was added to two volumes of DARA patient’s sera, and pan reactivity was demonstrated before submitting them for DTT testing.
RESULTS
Efficacy of different dithiothreitol concentrations in reducing daratumumab interference
There was a clear difference between gel test brands and panagglutination intensity of reaction. For every serum sample, the degree of reactivity was higher with Grifols or Accross AHG gel test, compared to BioRad.
Combinations of DTT concentrations from 0.01 mol/L to 0.04 mol/L, and incubation times with RBCs at 37 °C, from 15 to 40 min were assayed. The objective was to find a DTT concentration working for every gel test brand and a 15-min incubation time. As far as the efficacy of different DTT concentrations is concerned, samples tested with BioRad showed elimination of the interference with DTT 0.02 mol/L and 15-min incubation. Conversely, it was necessary to increase DTT concentration up to 0.04 mol/L and 15-min incubation for the complete elimination of pan reactivity of samples tested with Grifols or Across AHG gel test.
The combination of RBC treatment with DTT 0.04 mol/L directly on AHG gel cards and 15-min incubation at 37 °C was capable of eliminating the DARA interference of all patient’s samples, regardless of the gel test brand used and degree of initial panagglutination.
Detection of underlying alloantibodies
One sample of a DARA patient with anti-D and anti-E alloantibodies, previously detected with the reference DTT 0.2 mol/L method, was assayed with the new method. Screening IAT showed pan reactivity with all RBCs, but two different intensities were observed: 4+ with cells I and II and 2+ with cell III (ID-Diacell panel) or III and IV (Grifols panel). Reactivity with cell III of BioRad and III and IV of Grifols disappeared after treatment with DTT 0.04 mol/L and 15-min incubation. Remaining reactivity with cells I and II revealed the presence of underlying alloantibodies. Antibody identification workup with an 11-RBC panel treated with the new DTT method revealed the presence of two alloantibodies of anti-D and anti-E specificities.
Two additional samples of patients with anti-CD38 interference, inoculated with anti-K and anti-Fya serum at a ratio of 2 volumes of DARA patient’s sera to one volume of anti-K and anti-Fya serum were tested. Using DTT 0.04 mol/L and 15-min incubation, both alloantibodies were correctly identified. Two more samples of patients on DARA therapy were inoculated with serum containing high-titre anti-K. Samples were tested using 0.04 mol/L DTT and a 15-min incubation scheme and, again, alloanti-K was correctly identified.
Effect of dithiothreitol 0.04 mol/L on different blood group antigens
All low DTT concentrations tested (from 0.01 mol/L to 0.04 mol/L) preserved the antigens of different blood groups’ systems known to be susceptible to high DTT (0.2 mol/L) concentrations, as shown in every run using anti-k, anti-Kpb, and anti-Lub polyclonal antisera.
Serial double dilutions of polyclonal anti-k, anti-Kpb and anti-Lub antisera, as well as three patients’ sera containing anti-Yta, anti-JMH and anti-K alloantibodies, were submitted to IAT with RBCs treated with 0.04 mol/L for 15 min at 37 °C. In parallel, the same antisera/sera dilutions were tested with untreated RBCs with the addition of 25 μL PBS to maintain the same RBC dilution factor.
These tests showed that anti-k, anti-Kpb, anti-Lub, anti-K, anti-Yta, and anti-JMH titres with DTT-treated RBCs did not vary significantly compared to untreated RBCs, confirming that the new DTT method preserves clinically significant RBC group antigens. Even an alloantibody with a titre as low as 1 (anti-JMH) was detected with DTT-treated RBCs (Table I).
Table I.
Titration of several antibodies against red blood cells untreated and treated with dithiothreitol 0.04mol/L
| Antibody | Titre without DTT | Titre after DTT |
|---|---|---|
| Anti-K | 32 | 16 |
| Anti-k | 16 | 16 |
| Anti-Kpb | 16 | 16 |
| Anti-Lub | 8 | 8 |
| Anti-Yta | 64 | 64 |
| Anti-JMH | 1 | 1 |
DTT: dithiothreitol.
Time-to-test results
The turnaround time (TAT) of the new method for an antibody screening with four cells was 45 min compared to the 120 min needed for the current DTT 0.2 mol/L technique; this is 75 min quicker. Therefore, the new method takes only 15 min more than a regular IAT.
DISCUSSION
This study demonstrates that the elimination of anti-CD38 interference can be perfectly accomplished with lower DTT concentrations (0.04 mol/L), while preserving Kell and other blood groups’ antigens and reducing the TAT of pre-transfusion compatibility tests. From an economic point of view, this method significantly reduces the costs of the reagents and of laboratory technical staff.
One of the major problems for hospital transfusion services in performing compatibility tests for patients on anti-CD38 MoAbs therapy, is the long TAT of the current DTT 0.2 mol/L method. Furthermore, the current DTT method prevents detection and identification of alloantibodies of several blood group systems. DTT 0.2 mol/L also damages RBC membranes, producing visible haemolysis, and causing some RBC stroma to be trapped on top of gel columns, giving a false positive image.
The new method uses lower DTT concentrations so it does not cause as much damage to RBC membranes, thus preventing false positive images and haemolysis. Another advantage is the elimination of washing RBCs before and after DTT treatment, which significantly reduces the TAT. Other methods have been proposed for eliminating the interference1–7, such as anti-idiotype antibodies and CD38 soluble antigens; however, these are still not commercially available2.
Recent research has been directed to the development of DARA Fab fragments6,7 that block CD38 epitopes on the RBC membranes, overcoming DARA interference. DARAex (Imusyn; patent-pending) is a new technology based on DARA Fab fragments that mask CD38 antigens in RBCs. It is a very promising approach that also preserves the integrity of red blood group antigens. However, the major drawback of this method is the price, which makes it unaffordable for most blood transfusion services. Furthermore, DARAex pre-incubation of RBCs before IAT is about 30 min, while our method only needs 15 min. In addition, the usefulness of DARAex is probably restricted to patients taking DARA, and it is not known whether it works in patients treated with Isatuximab, MOR202, or other anti-CD38 MoAbs. On the other hand, our low concentration DTT method works with every anti-CD38 MoAb because it is based on direct CD38 glycoprotein denaturation and, therefore, is not affected by different MoAb binding affinities. Furthermore, the new method described here, is safe, fast and inexpensive.
By using this new DTT method, clinically significant blood group antigenicity will be preserved and complementary preventive strategies, such as full phenotyping/genotyping before daratumumab treatment, or the use of K negative RBCs10, may not be necessary.
The Osaka Hospital group4 was the first to describe the benefits of reducing DTT concentration for RBC treatment to overcome DARA interference. Although their DTT 0.01 mol/L method significantly reduces TAT compared to regular DTT 0.2 mol/L treatment, it is not useful for hospitals working exclusively with gel test technology. In Spain, many transfusion services no longer have tube technology in place, nor Coombs washing centrifuges in their laboratories. This situation is actually limiting their ability to appropriately manage transfusion of DARA patients.
Compared to our method, the TAT of the Osaka method is 15 min longer. Moreover, our study demonstrates that not only K antigen is unaffected by DTT 0.04 mol/L treatment, but also k, Kpb, Lub, Yta, and JMH antigens are not denatured.
One limitation of our study is that we were unable to test the integrity of other red blood cell antigens because of the scarcity of sera of anti-LW, -Dombrock, -Knops, -Indian and -Raph specificities. Another limitation is that incubation of DTT 0.04 mol/L along with patient’s sera, where the final DTT concentration reaches 0.01 mol/L, may diminish the ability to detect IgM alloantibodies; but this is only a theoretical inconvenience as long as compatibility testing is performed in IAT to look for clinically significant, IgG, alloantibodies.
CONCLUSIONS
The new method described here fulfils the needs of many transfusion services in eliminating the anti-CD38 interference while maintaining the ability to detect the vast majority of blood group alloantibodies. Following on from the Osaka method, we would like to name the method described in this article as the Valencia method.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Authors would like to acknowledge Mrs. Amparo Bernardez, Mrs. Nuria Martinez and Mrs. Isabel Terrón for their technical expertise in performing all the tests.
Footnotes
AUTHORSHIP CONTRIBUTIONS
EC developed the study concept and design, conducted the study, and also drafted the manuscript. dML and LL contributed to the revision and correction of the manuscript. CA is responsible for the critical revision of the final manuscript.
The Authors declare no conflict of interests.
REFERENCES
- 1.Chapuy CI, Nicholson RT, Aguad MD, et al. Resolving the daratumumab interference with blood compatibility testing. Transfusion. 2015;55:1545–54. doi: 10.1111/trf.13069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Oostendorp M, Lammerts van Bueren JJ, Doshi P, et al. When blood transfusion medicine becomes complicated due to interference by monoclonal antibody therapy. Transfusion. 2015;55:1555–62. doi: 10.1111/trf.13150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chapuy CI, Nicholson RT, Aguad MD, et al. DARA-DTT Study Group for the BEST Collaborative International validation of a dithiothreitol (DTT)-based method to resolve the daratumumab interference with blood compatibility testing. Transfusion. 2016;56:2964–72. doi: 10.1111/trf.13789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hosokawa M, Kashiwagi H, Nakayama K, et al. Distinct effects of daratumumab on indirect and direct antiglobulina test: a new method employing 0.01 mol/L dithiothreitol for negating the daratumumab interference with preserving K antigenicity (Osaka method) Transfusion. 2018;58:3003–13. doi: 10.1111/trf.14900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sellweng K, Gebicka PD, Thiele T. F(ab’)2 fragments to overcome daratumumab interference in transfusion test. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:90–1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1804751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Werle E, Ziebart J, Wasmund E, Eske-Pogodda K. Daratumumab interference in pretransfusion testing is overcome by addition of Daratumumab Fab fragments to patient’s plasma. Transfus Med Hemother. 2019;46:423–30. doi: 10.1159/000495773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Karen N, Ziza Chinoca, Tainá A, et al. A blockage monoclonal antibody protocol as an alternative strategy to avoid anti-CD38 interference in immunohematological testing. Transfusion. 2019;59:1827–35. doi: 10.1111/trf.15202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Reid ME, Lomas-Francis C, Olsson ML. The blood groups antigen facts book. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elsvier/AP; 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fung MK, Grossman BJ, Hillyer CD, et al. AABB Technical Manual. 18th ed. Bethesda: AABB; 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rumsey DH, Cieselski DJ. New protocols in serologic testing: a review of techniques to meet today’s challenges. Immunohematology. 2000;16:131–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Anani WQ, Marchan MG, Bensing KM, et al. Practical approaches and costs for provisioning safe transfusions during anti-CD38 therapy. Transfusion. 2017;57:1470–9. doi: 10.1111/trf.14021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
