Skip to main content
NCBI home page
ACS Omega logoLink to ACS Omega
. 2020 Jul 10;5(28):17767–17774. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c02448

Production and Use of Selenium Nanoparticles as Fertilizers

Sergey V Gudkov †, Georgy A Shafeev †,‡, Alexey P Glinushkin §, Alexey V Shkirin †,‡, Ekaterina V Barmina †, Ignat I Rakov †, Alexander V Simakin †, Anatoly V Kislov §, Maxim E Astashev ∥, Vladimir A Vodeneev ⊥, Valery P Kalinitchenko §,#,*
PMCID: PMC7377367  PMID: 32715263

Abstract

graphic file with name ao0c02448_0006.jpg

The synergy problem was discussed linking Se nanoparticles and different soil fertility agents. Se zero-valent-state nanoparticles were investigated as fertilizers and antioxidants. A technology was proposed for producing Se zero-valent-state nanoparticles. Se nanoparticles were obtained by laser ablation of Se in water using a fiber ytterbium laser, with a wavelength between 1060 and 1070 nm, a pulse repetition rate of 20 kHz, a pulse duration of 80 ns, and an average power of 20 W, and a copper vapor laser with wavelengths of 510.6 and 578.2 nm and an average power of 8 W. The main particle mass part shifted from 800 nm to a size less than 100 nm, corresponding to the increase in the laser fragmentation time. The resulting nanoparticles were monodisperse in size and mass. The Se nanoparticle water suspension was introduced into the soil. The soil Se nanoparticle concentrations were about 1, 5, 10, and 25 μg kg–1. An experiment was carried out in a climate chamber in two series: (1) growing plants in soil imitating the standard organogenesis environment conditions such as illumination of 16 h per day, temperature of 22 °C, soil humidity of 25% SDW, and an experiment duration of 30 days and (2) growing plants in soil under changing environmental conditions of organogenesis. The standard environmental conditions for the first 10 days are illumination of 16 h day–1, temperature of 22 °C, and soil humidity of 25% SDW. The plant stress for 5 days is hyperthermia of 40 °C. The standard environmental conditions for the next 15 days are illumination of 16 h day–1, temperature of 22 °C, and soil humidity of 25% SDW. At standard organogenesis, the plant leaf plate surface area was 30 ± 2 cm2 in the control option, and the Se nanoparticle doses were correspondingly 1 μg kg–1 for 32 ± 3 cm2, 5 μg kg–1 for 37 ± 2 cm2, 10 μg kg–1 for 38 ± 3 cm2, and 25 μg kg–1 for 28 ± 4 cm2. Hyperthermia stressed plant growth was studied. The highest plant growth rate was in Se nanoparticle concentrations of 5 and 10 μg kg–1. The eggplant growth on the soil with the Se nanoparticle addition at a concentration of 10 μg kg–1 of leaf plate surface area was twice compared to the eggplant growth in untreated soil. The same was for tomato plants. The leaf plate surface area of the cucumber plant grown using Se nanoparticles was 50% higher compared to the control option. The Biogeosystem technique methodology of 20–45 cm soil-layer intrasoil milling for soil multilevel aggregate system formation and intrasoil pulse continuous-discrete watering for soil water regime control was proposed for the Se nanoparticles for better function in the real soil, providing a synergy effect of soil mechanical processing, nanoparticles, humic substances, and polymicrobial biofilms on soil fertility.

1. Introduction

Trace element selenium is indispensable for the functioning of most living creatures.1 Se is found in soil, water, crops, animals, and food.2 The soil Se content varies greatly throughout the world. The selenium content of soils varies greatly from 0.005 to 1200 μg g–1 and most commonly between 0.1 and 10 μg g–1.3−6 The concentration of Se in an individual living organism highly depends on Se consumption.7−9 Se nanoparticles enhance the plant disease suppressing ability and manifest the antifungal properties.10,11

Se is a part of mammal protein, which is commonly named as selenoproteins.12 There are 25 known selenoproteins. At least 12 selenoproteins are antioxidant enzymes largely involved in the redox homeostasis of the organism along with other enzyme antioxidants.13,14 The most known proteins of this kind are glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Pxs), thioredoxin reductase (TrxR), and selenoprotein P (SePP). The last molecule contains up to 10 Se atoms.15 Enzymes have a tetrameric form and contain one Se per subunit.16 Selenoproteins form an antioxidant barrier for the protection of organisms from the damaging effect of the cellular metabolism harmful products including reactive oxygen species.17,18 The enzymes decompose hydrogen peroxide and organic hydroperoxides, protecting the tissue from oxidative damage.19 The TrxRs are involved in the cell redox potential determination and signaling. SePP is an extracellular antioxidant.20 Selenoprotein activity depends on the Se concentration in tissues.

Normalizing Se balance in the organism is an important task.21 For this, selenium content correction is carried out in food products. The Se balance in food could be corrected, if needed, by Se containing fertilizer application to the soil.22 The Se-balanced food manufacturing technology is simple. This allows us to overcome the Se imbalance problem in the vast agricultural lands completely. The problem of soil Se concentration normalization has been tried to be solved for more than half a century.1 Organic (selenium-containing amino acids, chelates, etc.) and inorganic (oxides, salts, and selenium minerals) selenium compounds are used as fertilizers. The peculiarity of both classes of fertilizers is that the Se introduced into the soil remains in the upper fertile layer until one or, at best, a few harvests only. Then, inorganic selenium compounds are leached along with rains into the lower soil infertile horizons. The organic Se compounds are not actively leached but degraded rather quickly after applying. The zero-valent Se nanoscale state is a concomitant additive to fertilizers. These nanoparticles do not dissolve in water and aqueous solutions and are not leached from the soil slowly. Different methodological approaches are used for producing Se nanoparticles.23−25 Se is supplied from the soil to plants via nanoparticle surface gradual oxidation and oxide release to the soil solution.

This paper is a development of our previous studies.26−29 The technology for producing Se zero-valent-state nanoparticles has been discussed. The Se zero-valent-state nanoparticles were investigated as fertilizers and antioxidants. The synergy problem is discussed linking Se nanoparticles and plant oxidative stress reduction.15,30,31 The study has synergistic focus. It has opened up the possibility not only to produce but also to apply the Se zero-valent-state nanoparticles based on the Biogeosystem Technique (BGT*) methodology for long-term improvement of the soil system and for higher agricultural efficacy of Se nanoparticles.32

The aims of the research are as follows: Se nanoparticle zero-valent-state study, Se nanoparticle technology of laser ablation in water development, experimental study of Se nanoparticle influence on the plant growth, and effective agricultural application of Se nanoparticles via the BGT* methodology.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Se Nanoparticle Properties

The Se nanoparticles obtained by ablation of a bulk Se target in still water with power fiber laser have relatively large sizes, around 700–800 nm.28 The resulting nanoparticles were nearly monodisperse in size and mass. This is due to the fact that Se is a brittle material, and the ablated particles are composed of small entities in the course of “classical” ablation. These are particles detached from the target because of thermal shock. The latter particles are larger and should be used for the tests. The laser fragmentation process has been applied for particle size reduction. The individual particles were melted under the laser pulse, and thus, the average size of the individual particles gradually decreased. Fragmentation time of the mass distribution function of Se particles subjected to laser fragmentation is shown in Figure 1a. The 0 min curve showed the just-generated Se particle content. The gradual decrease of the average size of individual particles matches the high probability of the above-mentioned antioxidant potential manifestation of Se nanoparticles in plant products. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) view of Se nanoparticles after laser fragmentation is shown in Figure 1b. The main Se nanoparticle fraction after fragmentation is less than 100 nm.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) Mass distribution function of Se particles as a function of laser fragmentation time. The fragmentation time is indicated near each distribution curve, min; (b) TEM view of Se nanoparticles after laser fragmentation, scale bar 200 nm.

The main nanoparticle mass is contained in the particles of 800 nm diameter. The main particle mass part shifted to a small particle size correspondingly when the laser fragmentation time gradually increased and arrived finally to a size less than 500 nm according the X-ray diffractograms of Se particles (Figure 2). The value 500 nm corresponds to the generally accepted notion that nanoparticles have a size of 100 nm. The last fraction of nanoparticles was widely present in the product. Fragmented Se nanoparticles are amorphous (Figure 2a). This fact corresponds to the previous observations.27 Relatively large Se particles preserve a crystallographic orientation of the initial target (Figure 2b). Smaller Se nanoparticles have no distinct crystalline structure. However, it can be supposed that a structural difference does not affect the possibility of successful soil application of the Se nanoparticles as stimulants and antioxidants because a great part of the product is formed from the active nanoparticles of size about 100 nm. A positive circumstance is that the biological activity of amorphous nanoparticles is higher compared to that of crystalline nanoparticles. This feature can be discussed concerning the greater size particle fraction. On the one hand, this fraction can be supposed that it consisted of crystalline nanoparticles with amorphous nanoparticles on the surface. On the other hand, greater size particles can be presented as those associated with amorphous nanoparticles. In both cases, the association of Se nanoparticles to the complexes with soil mineral matter is believed to be reduced. The fragmentation provides prolonged functioning of associated Se nanoparticles because of the rather stable “associated Se nanoparticle—soil solution” interface. Se nanoparticles influence the seedlings, plant growth, biochemical characteristics, and yield.33−35

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

X-ray diffraction patterns of Se nanoparticles. (a) Se nanoparticles obtained directly after laser ablation and dried at room temperature in atmospheric air; (b) large sedimented Se particles.

2.2. Se Nanoparticle Effect on Plants

The effect of Se nanoparticles at different concentrations on plant development was studied using the climate chamber. It has been revealed that Se nanoparticles did not affect the plant growth very significantly under unchanged artificial climate for the first 10 days of organogenesis (Figure 3). The plant’s growth and habitat were slightly better with a Se nanoparticle dose of 10 μg kg–1. For more complete assessment, we calculated the plant leaf plate surface area using Green Image software. The biggest difference in indicators was registered in an experiment conducted on the 30th day after the beginning of the plant growth. The plant leaf plate surface area was 30 ± 2 cm2 in the control option of the experiment. The leaf plate surface area of plants grown at a Se nanoparticle concentration of 1 μg kg–1 was about 32 ± 3 cm2 and correspondingly the leaf plate area for 5 μg kg–1 was 37 ± 2 cm2, 10 μg kg–1 was 38 ± 3 cm2, and 25 μg kg–1 was 28 ± 4 cm2.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a,b) Radish (Raphanus sativus var. sativus) seedlings and (c,d) arugula (Eruca sativa) seedlings grown on intact soil (control option, first on the left); soil supplemented with Se nanoparticles at concentrations of 1 μg kg–1 (second from the left); 5 μg kg–1 (in the middle); 10 μg kg–1 (second from the right); and 25 μg kg–1 (first right); (a,c) 5 days after planting; (b,d) 10 days after planting.

The high-temperature stress alleviation by Se nanoparticles was shown for Sorghum. Hyperthermia inhibited the development of radish plants (Figure 4).28 The plant leaf plate surface area was only about 14 ± 3 cm2 in the control option of the experiment 30 days after planting. Hyperthermia has stressed the plants grown at a Se nanoparticle concentration of 1 μg kg–1. The plant leaf plate surface area was 16 ± 4 cm2 at a Se nanoparticle concentration of 1 μg kg–1, and correspondingly, the leaf plate area for 5 μg kg–1 was 27 ± 3 cm2; 10 μg kg–1 was 29 ± 3 cm2, and 25 μg kg–1 was 15 ± 3 cm2. The stressed plant’s growth rate was the highest in Se nanoparticle concentrations of 5 and 10 μg kg–1. The plant leaf plate surface area after Se nanoparticle application was almost 2 times larger compared to the stressed plants grown without Se nanoparticle addition to the soil. It was observed that such a pattern was observed when growing at least three radish generations on the same soil. This is a preliminary proof of the possible prolonged action of Se nanoparticles. Consequently, further studies are of high priority on the Se nanoparticle application to the soil for effective preservation. Because the effectiveness does not differ much in the Se nanoparticle concentrations of 5 and 10 μg kg–1, we decided to use the Se nanoparticle concentration of 10 μg kg–1 only in the subsequent experiments. Tentatively, the potential time for Se leaching from soil could be increased at higher Se nanoparticle concentrations.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Radish (Raphanus sativus var. sativus) seedlings 20 days after planting: (a) grown on intact soil; (b) grown on the soil with the Se nanoparticles added at a concentration of 1 μg kg–1; (c) grown on the soil with the Se nanoparticles added at a concentration of 5 μg kg–1; (d) grown on the soil with the Se nanoparticles added at a concentration of 10 μg kg–1; and (e) grown on the soil with the Se nanoparticles added at a concentration of 25 μg kg–1.

The plant organogenesis proceeds in different ways after heat stress of the plants grown in the untreated soil and of the plants grown in the soil with the Se nanoparticle concentration of 10 μg kg–1 (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Plants grown in the intact soil (right) and in the soil supplemented with Se nanoparticles at a concentration of 10 μg kg–1 (left) after heat stress. (a) Eggplant (Solanum melongena); (b) cucumber (C. sativus); (c) tomato (S. lycopersicum); and (d) chilli pepper (C. annuum).

The Se nanoparticles did not affect the development of chilli peppers compared to the control option after hyperthermia. The plant organogenesis was satisfactory in both options. We also experimented with barley (Hordeum vulgare) and cabbage (Brassica oleracea) seedlings. Cabbage did not survive the hyperthermia in both conditions, that is, being grown on the soil with the addition of Se nanoparticles at a concentration of 10 μg kg–1 and grown in the untreated soil (control option). Only few barley plants (about 10% of the seedling initial number) of a series survived in the soil with Se nanoparticles.

After exposure to hyperthermia, the eggplant grown on the soil with the Se nanoparticle addition at a concentration of 10 μg kg–1 showed almost twice the plant leaf plate surface area compared to the eggplant plant leaf plate surface area grown in the untreated soil. Similar results were obtained with the leaf plate surface area of tomato plants. The leaf plate surface area of the cucumber plant grown using Se nanoparticles increased almost by 50% compared to the experimental control option. The antioxidant potential manifestation of Se nanoparticle can be substantial to support the plant organogenesis under hyperthermia in the options of the experiment discussed in the paragraph.

2.3. Se Nanoparticle Efficacy in Soil

There are some additional problems involved in the soil application of Se nanoparticles. The application of Se nanoparticles to the soil is a multipurpose action. The indispensable trace element Se is supplied to plants in the form of a fertilizer. The soil organic matter (SOM) is stimulated with Se nanoparticles as the other plant nutrition sources.36 Further, stimulation efficacy is probably via the humic substance (HS) supplied simultaneously with Se and other nanoparticles.37 The Se nanoparticles, HS, and SOM functioning in the soil are linked to organic matter degradation. Organic matter degradation is controlled by microbial communities significantly influencing soil fertility. Bacteria within specific habitats are not a faceless mixture of the once acquired participants but are structurally strictly ordered polymicrobial communities in which each participant takes its specific functional place. The occurrence of polymicrobial communities, structures, and composition of polymicrobial biofilms in soil is an important objective for controlled soil evolution. The soil is a sophisticated bioreactor whose performance provides acceleration of manifold biodegradation processes.38,39 This acceleration is achieved by sustaining, promoting, and steering of preselected polymicrobial consortia. Thus, the soil microbiome functioning in distinct areas should be distinguished and expanded. The soil is not a perfect bioreactor as a mammal colon. We insist that the soil bioreactor function has to be improved. The standard agricultural technology fails to achieve this goal.

In our experiment, we mixed Se nanoparticles at the soil granulometric composition microlevel using forced soil and solution introduced to soil mixing. A good contact of Se nanoparticles and the soil provided the needed result. In standard agronomic practice, ploughing or other soil cultivation procedures do not provide the formation of the soil aggregate system needed for proper Se nanoparticle functioning. The soil clods are of a transverse dimension up to 100 mm after standard ploughing.40 Thus, the Se nanoparticles will fall into the gaps between large soil aggregates and thus will be excluded from the active soil biological process.

Another concern of the Se nanoparticle as well as other nanoparticle, HS, and polymicrobial biofilm function in the standard agrarian technology framework is soil moistening. It is a well-known fact that the soil water content must be suitable for the plant growth and for the functions of nanoparticles, HS, polymicrobial biofilms. The soil water content should not be too high, preventing leaching of the nanoparticles and other soil matter. However, standard irrigation is incapable to decide this task because the soil humidity is high after standard watering. This determines the soil interface degradation and water and matter loss to the preferential water flux from the soil to the vadose zone.

The nanoparticles used in agriculture has an important issue which is the strict dosage and distribution control. Both are impossible under the current agrarian technology. Thus, the assessment of the environmental risk of nanoparticle application in the soil and/or to the plant (seeds) for plants, animals, and humans is defined as high.41

Se nanoparticles are the pronounced low-dose stimulant. The Se standard fertilizer form application is assessed as less efficient compared to the Se nanoparticles concerning biological processes and the yield in the soil and plants.42−44 Nanoparticle dosage prescription demands precaution because excessive nanoparticle doses are toxic to plants and the soil.45 The nanoparticle’ doses for foliar or soil applications are different because of soil sorption capability.46 The recommended Se nanoparticle dosage is about 0.1–0.4 g ha–1,42,47 but this dose, as well as a tenfold and even hundred times higher doses, is not capable to be supplied using standard agricultural equipment. Thus, the Se nanoparticle application to the field crops is possible now only on small experimental plots.47 A manual mixing and application to the soil and/or plant (seeds) is practiced in the absence of a suitable robotic system.

Stability of nanoparticles over time is commonly regarded as acceptable. In our opinion, this point of view is an exaggeration. Being a result of the natural product heavy transformation, the nanoparticles have a finite term of existence. There is an urgent need to produce the nanoparticles immediately before the application in the soil and to plants. In addition to the above-mentioned motives, this task ensures a suitable robotic system synthesis.

The problems mentioned can be solved using the BGT* methodology.32 Active intrasoil milling of the 20–45 cm soil layer can provide a fine aggregate soil system of an initially compacted soil subarable horizon.48,49 This improves the soil and ensures a possibility to supply the Se nanoparticles, HS, and polymicrobial biofilm starters into the soil while soil milling.50 New abundant soil interfaces ensure a high rate of soil biological process in the multilevel soil architecture system. Because of their high surface energy, nanoparticle aggregates into the complexes with soil matter. Therefore, nanoparticles after application into the soil are no longer the initial substances. BGT* overcomes this circumstance because of the priority rhizosphere development. The probability is higher in the interactions on the internal surface of the soil where nanoparticles are located—root system interface. This provides a high rate of Se nanoparticle supply to the plants. On the contrary, the mean rate of soil passivation of Se nanoparticles is lower because of the reduction in the interaction period of Se nanoparticles and the internal surface of the soil. The BGT* intrasoil pulse continuous-discrete watering paradigm provides water supply to the soil without leaching the soil substances.51 The soil matrix potential value is from −0.2 to −0.4 MPa after intrasoil pulse continuous-discrete watering application. This potential is much less than that of standard irrigation. However, at the same time, this soil matrix potential value is a priority for the plants and soil biome organogenesis. It is very important for the soil matter turnover because the water spread throughout the soil is strictly controlled. This eliminates the water preferential flux to the vadose zone, soil matter leaching and provides the Se nanoparticles, HS, polymicrobial biofilm starters an expanded development, as well as the soil biological process and high productivity of the soil.52

For the first time, the synergistic efficacy was shown for the Se zero-valent-state nanoparticles, and a new procedure has been proposed for this substance to be applied to the soil based on the BGT* methodology.32 This synergy will provide a long-term fertility to the soil system and high stable plant productivity.53 The soil, plant, and environmental health will be improved.54−56

3. Study Implications and Outlook

In this paper, a developed technology has been shown for producing Se nanoparticles using laser ablation. The prepared Se nanoparticles consisted of zero-valent Se and had the same characteristic size. The prepared Se nanoparticles do not significantly affect the development of plants under reference conditions. The prepared Se nanoparticles effectively leveled the adverse effect of hyperthermia in eggplant, tomato, and cucumber seedling organogenesis. The prepared Se nanoparticle concentration of 10 μg kg–1 in the soil is the most effective for the antioxidant potential manifestation of Se nanoparticles and plant growth improvement. The BGT* methodology for the intrasoil milling of 20–45 cm soil layer for soil multilevel aggregate system formation and intrasoil pulse continuous-discrete watering for controlling soil water regime has a perspective for better functioning of Se nanoparticles in the real soil. This will provide a synergy effect of soil mechanical processing, nanoparticles, HS, and polymicrobial biofilms on the soil fertility.

4. Methods

4.1. Selenium Nanoparticle Production

Se nanoparticles were produced in water using the laser ablation process. For the irradiation of the solid Se target, the following lasers were used: a fiber ytterbium laser with a wavelength between 1060 and 1070 nm, pulse repetition rate of 20 kHz, pulse duration of 80 ns, and average power of 20 W and a copper vapor laser with wavelengths of 510.6 and 578.2 nm and an average power of 8 W.

In the first series of studies, the Se target was exposed to laser irradiation in a still water medium.

In the second series of studies, a flowing cell reactor was used. This kind of reactor provides the just-generated nanoparticle screening action reduction in the course of target laser irradiation. The Se nanoparticle generation rate was about 0.8 mg/min in still water and 2.4 mg/min in a flowing cell reactor.57 The generated Se nanoparticle size was determined using analytical measuring centrifuge DC24000 (CPS Instruments). The nanoparticle morphology was acquired using the TEM Carl Zeiss 200FE accounting for electron energy loss spectroscopy. The nanoparticle crystalline structure was determined on X-ray diffractometer Bruker AXS P4.

4.2. Vegetation Tests

The Se nanoparticle water suspension was introduced into the soil. The soil Se nanoparticle concentration was about 1, 5, 10, and 25 μg kg–1. To apply the Se nanoparticle in ultralow doses, the original colloidal solution of nanoparticles was diluted with water to provide a dose of 100 g of diluted solution per kg of the soil, air-dried at 22 °C. For that, forced soil mechanical mixing was applied in the course of diluted solution, by adding the soil to achieve the uniform distribution of nanoparticles into the soil. The experiments were carried out in a climate chamber using the following procedures.

  • 1.

    Plants are grown in the soil imitating the standard organogenesis environment conditions: illumination of 16 h per day, temperature of 22 °C, soil humidity of 25% SDW, and an experiment duration of 30 days.

  • 2.

    Plants are grown in the soil under changing organogenesis environment conditions. The standard environmental conditions for the first 10 days are as follows: illumination of 16 h day–1, temperature of 22 °C, and soil humidity of 25% SDW. The plant stress for 5 days in hyperthermia of 40 °C. The standard environmental conditions for the next 15 days are as follows: illumination of 16 h day–1, temperature of 22 °C, and soil humidity of 25% SDW. It was assumed that the plant development rate under the stress could reduce compared to the standard organogenesis conditions in the second series of experiments.58

The plant species under experiment were radish (Raphanus sativus var. sativus), arugula (Eruca sativa), eggplant (Solanum melongena), cucumber (Cucumis sativus), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), and chilli pepper (Capsicum annuum). The plant seedlings were grown in the vegetation vessel with a diameter of 6 cm and a height of 10 cm. The plant seedling leaf surface area calculation was performed using Green Image software.59

The studied parameters were determined in triplicates. Calculations of the statistical significance of the data and the associated errors were performed with Statistica v.10.0.1011, developed by StatSoft (USA). All data presented are statistically significant at the level of p < 0.05.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the grant of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (18-52-70012 e-Asia (nanoparticle production), 19-02-00061-a (nanoparticle characterization)), and the grant of the President of the Russian Federation for young scientists MD-2128.2020.11 (work with fertilizers).

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Gissel-Nielsen G. Selenium content of some fertilizers and their influence on uptake of selenium in plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1971, 19, 564–566. 10.1021/jf60175a026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Rosenfeld I.; Beath O. A.. Selenium: Geobotany, Biochemistry, Toxicity and Nutrition; Academic Press: New York, London, 1964. [Google Scholar]
  3. Olfield J. E.Selenium e-World Atlas; STDA: Grimbergen, Belgium, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bagriantseva O. V.; Mazo V. K.; Khotimchenko S. A.; Shatrov G. N. In to the question of selenium using in case of foodstuffs enrichment. Vopr. Pitan. 2012, 81, 4–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Zachara B. A. Selenium in Complicated Pregnancy. A Review. Adv. Clin. Chem. 2018, 86, 157–178. 10.1016/bs.acc.2018.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Alexander J.Selenium. Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals, 4th ed.; Academic Press, 2015; Chapter 52, Vol II, pp 1175–1208 [Google Scholar]
  7. Borawska M. H.; Witkowska A. M.; Hukałowicz K.; Markiewicz R. Influence of Dietary Habits on Serum Selenium Concentration. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2004, 48, 134–140. 10.1159/000078375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Levander O. A. Scientific rationale for the 1989 recommended dietary allowance for selenium. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1991, 91, 1572–1576. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Adadi P.; Barakova N. V.; Muravyov K. Y.; Krivoshapkina E. F. Designing selenium functional foods and beverages: A review. Food Res. Int. 2019, 120, 708–725. 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.11.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nandini B.; Hariprasad P.; Prakash H. S.; Shetty H. S.; Geetha N. Trichogenic-selenium nanoparticles enhance disease suppressive ability of Trichoderma against downy mildew disease caused by Sclerospora graminicola in pearl millet. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2612. 10.1038/s41598-017-02737-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Joshi S. M.; De Britto S.; Jogaiah S.; Ito S.-i. Mycogenic Selenium Nanoparticles as Potential New Generation Broad Spectrum Antifungal Molecules. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 419. 10.3390/biom9090419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Varlamova E. G.; Cheremushkina I. V. Contribution of mammalian selenocysteine-containing proteins to carcinogenesis. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2017, 39, 76–85. 10.1016/j.jtemb.2016.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sharapov M. G.; Novoselov V. I.; Gudkov S. V. Radioprotective Role of Peroxiredoxin 6. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 15. 10.3390/antiox8010015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ulrich K.; Jakob U. The role of thiols in antioxidant systems. ree Radical Biol. Med. 2019, 140, 14–27. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.05.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Steinbrenner H.; Speckmann B.; Klotz L.-O. Selenoproteins: Antioxidant selenoenzymes and beyond. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2016, 595, 113–119. 10.1016/j.abb.2015.06.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zachara B. A. Mammalian selenoproteins. J. Trace Elem. 1992, 6, 137–151. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lyakhovich V. V.; Vavilin V. A.; Zenkov N. K.; Menshchikova E. B. Active defense under oxidative stress. The antioxidant responsive element. Biochemistry 2006, 71, 962–974. 10.1134/s0006297906090033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sharapov M. G.; Novoselov V. I. Catalytic and Signaling Role of Peroxiredoxins in Carcinogenesis. Biochemistry 2019, 84, 79–100. 10.1134/S0006297919020019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. de Lorgeril M.; Salen P. Selenium and antioxidant defences as major mediaters in the development in the chronic heart failure. Heart Failure Rev. 2006, 11, 13–17. 10.1007/s10741-006-9188-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mostert V. Selenoprotein P: Properties, Functions, and Regulation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2000, 376, 433–438. 10.1006/abbi.2000.1735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Asri-Rezaei S.; Nourian A.; Shalizar-Jalali A.; Najafi G.; Nazarizadeh A.; Koohestani M.; Karimi A. Selenium supplementation in the form of selenium nanoparticles and selenite sodium improves mature male mice reproductive performances. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2018, 21, 577–585. 10.22038/IJBMS.2018.26023.6397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kieliszek M. Selenium-Fascinating Microelement, Properties and Sources in Food. Molecules 2019, 24, 1298. 10.3390/molecules24071298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Aiqun Y., Zengwei H., Dongping W., Qifeng C., Zeguang Z., Xiaomei M.. Preparation method for nano-selenium. CN 103420344 A, Published on July 22, 2015https://patents.google.com/patent/CN103420344A/en.
  24. Pouri S.; Motamedi H.; Honary S.; Kazeminezhad I. Biological Synthesis of Selenium Nanoparticles and Evaluation of their Bioavailability. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2017, 60, e17160452 10.1590/1678-4324-2017160452. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sowndarya P.; Ramkumar G.; Shivakumar M. S. Green synthesis of selenium nanoparticles conjugated Clausena dentata plant leaf extract and their insecticidal potential against mosquito vectors. Artif. Cells, Nanomed., Biotechnol. 2017, 45, 1490–1495. 10.1080/21691401.2016.1252383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gudkov S.; Glazkov P.; Zavalin A.; Kovaleva T.; Nikulina E.; Glushko A.; Dubinok N.; Shafeev G.; Davydov R. Production and application of selenium nanoparticles to prevent ionizing radiation-induced oxidative stress. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 390, 012031. 10.1088/1755-1315/390/1/012031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kuzmin P. G.; Shafeev G. A.; Voronov V. V.; Raspopov R. V.; Arianova E. A.; Trushina E. N.; Gmoshinskii I. V.; Khotimchenko S. A. Bioavailable nanoparticles obtained in laser ablation of a selenium target in water. Quantum Electron. 2012, 42, 1042–1044. 10.1070/qe2012v042n11abeh014754. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Shafeev G.; Barmina E.; Valiullin L.; Simakin A.; Ovsyankina A.; Demin D.; Kosolapov V.; Korshunov A.; Denisov R. Soil fertilizer based on selenium nanoparticles. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 390, 012041. 10.1088/1755-1315/390/1/012041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Simakin A.; Baimler I.; Uvarov O.; Rud’ I.; Krasnoshekov V. Obtaining of nanoparticles of Sc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni with controlled sizes and properties using laser ablation. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 390, 012036. 10.1088/1755-1315/390/1/012036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Cieschi M. T.; Polyakov A. Yu.; Lebedev V. A.; Volkov D. S.; Pankratov D. A.; Veligzhanin A. A.; Perminova I. V.; Lucena J. J. Eco-Friendly Iron-Humic Nanofertilizers Synthesis for the Prevention of Iron Chlorosis in Soybean (Glycine max) Grown in Calcareous Soil. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 413. 10.3389/fpls.2019.00413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Polyakov A. Y.; Lebedev V. A.; Shirshin E. A.; Rumyantsev A. M.; Volikov A. B.; Zherebker A.; Garshev A. V.; Goodilin E. A.; Perminova I. V. Non-classical growth of water-redispersible spheroidal gold nanoparticles assisted by leonardite humate. CrystEngComm 2017, 19, 876–886. 10.1039/c6ce02149b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kalinitchenko V.; Batukaev A.; Zarmaev A.; Startsev V.; Chernenko V.; Dikaev Z.; Sushkova S. Biogeosystem technique as the way to certainty of soil, hydrosphere, environment and climate. Geophys. Res. Abstr. 2016, 18, EGU2016-3419. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hu T.; Li H.; Li J.; Zhao G.; Wu W.; Liu L.; Wang Q.; Guo Y. Absorption and Bio-Transformation of Selenium Nanoparticles by Wheat Seedlings (Triticum aestivum L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 597. 10.3389/fpls.2018.00597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ragavan P.; Ananth A.; Rajan M. R. Impact of Selenium Nanoparticles on Growth, Biochemical Characteristics and Yield of Cluster Bean Cyamopsis tetragonoloba. Int. J. Environ. 2017, 2, 2917. 10.22161/ijeab/2.6.19. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Djanaguiraman M.; Belliraj N.; Bossmann S. H.; Prasad P. V. V. High-Temperature Stress Alleviation by Selenium Nanoparticle Treatment in Grain Sorghum. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 2479–2491. 10.1021/acsomega.7b01934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kalinichenko V. P.; Glinushkin A. P.; Sokolov M. S.; Zinchenko V. E.; Minkina T. M.; Mandzhieva S. S.; Sushkova S. N.; Makarenkov D. A.; Bakoyev S. Y.; Il’ina L. P. Impact of soil organic matter on calcium carbonate equilibrium and forms of Pb in water extracts from Kastanozem complex. J. Soils Sediments 2018, 19, 2717–2728. 10.1007/s11368-018-2123-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Volikov A. B.; Kholodov V. A.; Kulikova N. A.; Philippova O. I.; Ponomarenko S. A.; Lasareva E. V.; Parfyonova A. M.; Hatfield K.; Perminova I. V. Silanized humic substances act as hydrophobic modifiers of soil separates inducing formation of water-stable aggregates in soils. Catena 2016, 137, 229–236. 10.1016/j.catena.2015.09.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Piccolo A.; Spaccini R. ..; Savy D.; Drosos M.; Cozzolino V.. The Soil Humeome: Chemical Structure, Functions and Technological Perspectives. In Sustainable Agrochemistry; Vaz S., Jr., Ed.; Springer: Cham, 2019; pp 183–222. [Google Scholar]
  39. Swidsinski A.The colonic bioreactor—a forerunner model for future biotechnology (function, role, products & management). Conference: Fifth International Conference of CIS IHSS on Humic Innovative Technologies “Humic substances and living systems”, October 19–23, 2019.
  40. Kalinitchenko V. P.; Glinushkin A. P.; Sokolov M. S.; Sharshak V. K.; Ladan E. P.; Minkina T. M.; Zinchenko V. E.; Chernenko V. V.; Makarenkov D. A.; Rykhlik A. E.; Larin G. S. Nature-Based Technologies of Biogeosystem Technique. Agrochemistry 2020, 2, 61–68. [Google Scholar]
  41. Shipelin V. A.; Gmoshinski I. V.; Khotimchenko S. A. Risk assessment of silver nanoparticles. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 2015, 98, 012010. 10.1088/1757-899X/98/1/012010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Chernikova O.; Mazhayskiy Yu.; Ampleeva L. Selenium in nanosized form as an alternative to microfertilizers. Agron. Res. 2019, 17, 974–981. 10.15159/AR.19.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Pestovsky Y. S.; Martínez-Antonio A. The Use of Nanoparticles and Nanoformulations in Agriculture. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2017, 17, 8699–8730. 10.1166/jnn.2017.150418699. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Tremblay G. F.; Bélanger G.; Lajeunesse J.; Chouinard P. Y.; Charbonneau É. Timothy response to increasing rates of selenium fertilizer in Eastern Canada. Agron. J. 2015, 107, 211–220. 10.2134/agronj14.0397. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Rajput V.; Minkina T.; Sushkova S.; Behal A.; Maksimov A.; Blicharska E.; Ghazaryan K.; Movsesyan H.; Barsova N. ZnO and CuO nanoparticles: a threat to soil organisms, plants, and human health. Environ. Geochem. Health 2020, 42, 147–158. 10.1007/s10653-019-00317-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ljashenko G. M.; Kalinichenko V. P. Soil and air pollution of plant leaves with lead//Proceedings of higher educational institutions. North Caucasus region. Nat. Sci. 2006, S12, 124–130. [Google Scholar]
  47. Ampleyeva L. E.; Konkov A. A.; Rudnaya A. V. Selenium nanoparticles suspension influence on the corn “Obsky 140” seeds qualitative and quantitative indicators. Bull. P. A. Kostychev Ryazan Agrotechnological Univ. 2012, 3, 33–35. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kharitonova G. V.; Shein E. V.; Krutikova V. O.; Ostrouhov A. V. Calcium Carbonate Formations in Edaphic Components of Ecosystems. Biogeosystem Tech. 2018, 5, 197–212. 10.13187/bgt.2018.2.197. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Shein E. V.; Kharitonova G. V.; Milanovsky E. Yu. Aggregation of Natural Disperse Formations: Value of Organic Matter, Soluble Salts And Diatoms. Biogeosystem Tech. 2016, 7, 77–86. 10.13187/bgt.2016.7.77. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Kalinichenko V. P.Device for application of substance while intra-soil milling. RU 2387115 C2, Published on March 27, 2010.
  51. Kalinitchenko V. P.; Rykhlik A. E.. Biogeosystem Technique New World Water Paradigm for the Water Scarcity Overcoming. Fall 2019 National Meeting & Exposition, Chemistry & Water, August 25–29; American Chemical Society: San Diego, CA, 2019https://plan.core-apps.com/acs_sd2019/abstract/6dc4fdd9-0f1c-41b3-a54e-ac4e18736726.
  52. Glinushkin A. P.; Kudeyarov V. N.; Sokolov M. S.; Zinchenko V. E.; Chernenko V. V. Nature-Similar Technologies of the Biogeosystem Technique in Solving a Global Social and Environmental Problem. Biogeosystem Tech. 2018, 5, 159–196. 10.13187/bgt.2018.2.159. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Kot F. S.; Farran R.; Fujiwara K.; Kharitonova G. V.; Kochva M.; Shaviv A.; Sugo T. On boron turnover in plant-litter-soil system. Geoderma 2016, 268, 139–146. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.01.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Keesstra S. D.; Bouma J.; Wallinga J.; Tittonell P.; Smith P.; Cerdà A.; Montanarella L.; Quinton J. N.; Pachepsky Y.; van der Putten W. H.; Bardgett R. D.; Moolenaar S.; Mol G.; Jansen B.; Fresco L. O. The significance of soils and soil science towards realization of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Soil 2016, 2, 111–128. 10.5194/soil-2-111-201610.5194/soil-2-111-2016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. de Melo B. A. G.; Motta F. L.; Santana M. H. A. Humic acids: Structural properties and multiple functionalities for novel technological developments. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 62, 967–974. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Kalinitchenko V. P.; Glinushkin A.; Sokolov M.; Batukaev A.; Minkina T.; Zinchenko V.; Chernenko V.; Startsev V.; Mandzhieva S.; Sushkova S.; Makarenkov D.; Il’ina L.; Larin G.; Rykhlik A.. Biogeosystem Technique for Healthy Soil, Water and Environment. Fall 2019 National Meeting and Exposition, Chemistry and Water, August 25–29; American Chemical Society: San Diego, CA, 2019.
  57. Ayyyzhy K. O.; Voronov V. V.; Gudkov S. V.; Rakov I. I.; Simakin A. V.; Shafeev G. A. Laser Fabrication and Fragmentation of Selenium Nanoparticles in Aqueous Media. Phys. Wave Phenom. 2019, 27, 113–118. 10.3103/s1541308x19020055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Veselov A. P. Simulation Model of a Possible Trigger for Reversible Switching of the Stress Regime in Plants. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2001, 48, 104–110. 10.1023/A:1009015118298. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Astashev M.; Beloshapkina O.; Kvitko A.; Matasov A.; Zakharyan R.; Bogun I. Development of software for plant leaf area estimation. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 390, 012029. 10.1088/1755-1315/390/1/012029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from ACS Omega are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES