Skip to main content
European Heart Journal logoLink to European Heart Journal
. 2020 Jul 23;41(28):2618–2628. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa531

Genetic variability in the absorption of dietary sterols affects the risk of coronary artery disease

Anna Helgadottir 1,, Gudmar Thorleifsson 2, Kristjan F Alexandersson 3, Vinicius Tragante 4,5, Margret Thorsteinsdottir 6,7, Finnur F Eiriksson 8, Solveig Gretarsdottir 9, Eythór Björnsson 10,11,12, Olafur Magnusson 13, Gardar Sveinbjornsson 14, Ingileif Jonsdottir 15,16, Valgerdur Steinthorsdottir 17, Egil Ferkingstad 18, Brynjar Ö Jensson 19, Hreinn Stefansson 20, Isleifur Olafsson 21, Alex H Christensen 22, Christian Torp-Pedersen 23,24, Lars Køber 25, Ole B Pedersen 26,27, Christian Erikstrup 28, Erik Sørensen 29, Søren Brunak 30, Karina Banasik 31, Thomas F Hansen 32,33,34, Mette Nyegaard 35, Gudmundur I Eyjolfssson 36, Olof Sigurdardottir 37, Bjorn L Thorarinsson 38, Stefan E Matthiasson 39, Thora Steingrimsdottir 40,41, Einar S Bjornsson 42,43, Ragnar Danielsen 44, Folkert W Asselbergs 45,46,47, David O Arnar 48,49,50, Henrik Ullum 51, Henning Bundgaard 52, Patrick Sulem 53, Unnur Thorsteinsdottir 54,55, Gudmundur Thorgeirsson 56,57,58, Hilma Holm 59, Daniel F Gudbjartsson 60,61, Kari Stefansson 62,63,
PMCID: PMC7377579  PMID: 32702746

Abstract

Aims

To explore whether variability in dietary cholesterol and phytosterol absorption impacts the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) using as instruments sequence variants in the ABCG5/8 genes, key regulators of intestinal absorption of dietary sterols.

Methods and results

We examined the effects of ABCG5/8 variants on non-high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol (N up to 610 532) and phytosterol levels (N = 3039) and the risk of CAD in Iceland, Denmark, and the UK Biobank (105 490 cases and 844 025 controls). We used genetic scores for non-HDL cholesterol to determine whether ABCG5/8 variants confer greater risk of CAD than predicted by their effect on non-HDL cholesterol. We identified nine rare ABCG5/8 coding variants with substantial impact on non-HDL cholesterol. Carriers have elevated phytosterol levels and are at increased risk of CAD. Consistent with impact on ABCG5/8 transporter function in hepatocytes, eight rare ABCG5/8 variants associate with gallstones. A genetic score of ABCG5/8 variants predicting 1 mmol/L increase in non-HDL cholesterol associates with two-fold increase in CAD risk [odds ratio (OR) = 2.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.75–2.31, P =9.8 × 10−23] compared with a 54% increase in CAD risk (OR = 1.54, 95% CI 1.49–1.59, P =1.1 × 10−154) associated with a score of other non-HDL cholesterol variants predicting the same increase in non-HDL cholesterol (P for difference in effects = 2.4 × 10−4).

Conclusions

Genetic variation in cholesterol absorption affects levels of circulating non-HDL cholesterol and risk of CAD. Our results indicate that both dietary cholesterol and phytosterols contribute directly to atherogenesis.

graphic file with name eurheartj_41_28_2618_f4.jpg

Keywords: Dietary cholesterol, Phytosterols, Absorption, Genetics, ABCG5/8


See page 2629 for the editorial comment on this article (doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa445)

Introduction

The ABCG5 and ABCG8 genes encode the obligate heterodimers of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters G5 and G8 (ABCG5/8) that have a major role in preventing accumulation of dietary sterols, including cholesterol and sterols derived from plants (phytosterols), in the body.1 The ABCG5/8 transporter is mainly expressed in the small intestine on the absorptive surface of enterocytes and in the liver on hepatocytes facing the bile canaliculi (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A schematic representation of sterol transport in the intestine and liver. Dietary cholesterol and non-cholesterol sterols are transported from the intestinal lumen into enterocytes via NPC1L1.While approximately 50–60% of the cholesterol that has entered the enterocytes is taken up into the circulation, the majority of phytosterols are pumped back into the intestinal lumen by ABCG5/8. In addition to excreting phytosterols, the hepatic ABCG5/8 transporters have a major role in removing cholesterol from the body. Decreased ABCG5/8 function in the liver reduces gallstone risk through diminished cholesterol saturation in bile. Phytosterols in the diet are believed to attenuate the pool of absorbable cholesterol by displacing cholesterol from intestinal micelles.

Translational perspective

The importance of dietary cholesterol absorption in the regulation of cholesterol levels in blood and the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) has been the subject of controversy. We find that sequence variants that decrease the function of the ABCG5/8 transporter increase absorption of both cholesterol and phytosterols and increase the risk of CAD. The findings provide mechanistic insights indicating harmful effects of dietary cholesterol on cardiovascular disease. We also find that the impact of ABCG5/8 variants on the risk of CAD is not fully explained by non-HDL cholesterol. Thus, in addition to dietary cholesterol other dietary sterols such as phytosterols may contribute directly to atherogenesis, raising questions about the safety of supplementing food with phytosterols for the purpose of cardiovascular risk reduction.

While the NPC1L1 transporter, the target of the cholesterol-lowering drug ezetimibe,2 is responsible for the non-selective uptake of sterols into enterocytes and hepatocytes from the intestinal lumen and bile, respectively, the ABCG5/8 excretes them back into the intestinal lumen and bile1 (Figure 1).

Rare inactivating mutations in the ABCG5/8 genes cause autosomal recessive phytosterolaemia (also termed sitosterolaemia). This rare disorder is characterized by impaired sterol elimination from enterocytes and hepatocytes leading to excessive intestinal absorption of cholesterol and phytosterols, as well as reduced secretion to bile.3 Although autosomal recessive phytosterolaemia frequently involves hypercholesterolaemia, sometimes to the extreme,3 this is not always the case and significant premature atherosclerosis has been documented in the absence of substantial hypercholesterolaemia.3  ,  4

Common variants at the ABCG5/8 locus associate with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol,5  ,  6 phytosterol levels, and the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD).7  ,  8 Alleles that associate with decreased levels of LDL cholesterol also associate with increased risk of gallstones,7  ,  9  ,  10 likely mediated through an effect on cholesterol saturation in bile. Furthermore, NPC1L1 variants associate with LDL cholesterol and CAD,5  ,  11 and rare NPC1L1 inactivating variants associate with reduced levels of LDL cholesterol and phytosterols.12

While evidence from genetic studies and randomized clinical trials of cholesterol-lowering drugs demonstrates that the relationship between non-HDL/LDL cholesterol and CAD is causal,13  ,  14 the contribution of dietary cholesterol to cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and mortality has been debated for decades.15 Over the last few years, the importance of dietary cholesterol has been deemphasized in dietary recommendations in many countries.16  ,  17

The role of phytosterols in atherosclerotic disease is also a matter of controversy.18–20 The ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias17 recommend food enriched with phytosterols as a lifestyle intervention to reduce cholesterol levels by interfering with intestinal cholesterol absorption.21

Here, we explore whether variability in dietary cholesterol and phytosterol absorption impacts the risk of CAD, using sequence variants of the ABCG5/8 genes as instruments.

Methods

Detailed description of the studies included and methods used is provided in Supplementary material online, Methods. Briefly, we analysed data from three studies of individuals of European origin from Iceland, Denmark, and UK Biobank. We examined association of sequence variants in ABCG5/8 with non-HDL cholesterol22 in up to 610 532 individuals, phytosterol levels in 3039 individuals, and the risk of CAD in 105 490 cases and 844 025 controls. Variant associations were also assessed in public data from the Global Lipids Genetics Consortium23 (N up to 333 359) and CARDIoGRAM Exome24 (42 355 cases and 78 240 controls).

Logistic or linear regression, assuming additive models, was used to test for the association of variants with binary or quantitative traits, respectively. Variant association results from the different study groups were combined into meta-analyses assuming fixed effects. All P-values reported in this study are two-sided.

We constructed individual-level genetic risk scores (GRS) for levels of non-HDL cholesterol22 and calculated into the study subjects. The GRSs were generated for each individual by summing the product of the allele count and the corresponding non-HDL cholesterol effect size.

Results

Coding variants in ABCG5/8 and association with non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol and coronary artery disease

We identified 35 rare [minor allele frequency (MAF) ≥0.01% and <1%] coding variants in 28 075 whole-genome sequenced Icelanders that we subsequently imputed into chip-typed Icelanders and their close relatives (Supplementary material online, Methods). Six common (MAF > 5%) variants (five coding and one intronic) reported5–10 to associate with LDL cholesterol, CAD, and gallstones were also examined. We tested these ABCG5/8 variants for association with non-HDL and LDL cholesterol in datasets from Iceland, Denmark, the UK Biobank, and the Global Lipids Genetics Consortium (GLGC),23 and in a meta-analysis (N up to 943 891; Supplementary material online, Tables S1 and S2).

Of the 35 rare coding variants, nine associate with non-HDL cholesterol (P <0.05/41 = 1.2 × 10−3) (Table 1, Figure 2, and Supplementary material online, Table S1). We note that two or more of these nine rare variants never occur on the same haplotype (D´= −1, pairwise R  2 < 3.0 × 10−6), with the exception of p. Phe624Leu in ABCG5 that is always observed on the background of p. Gly27Ala in the same gene (D´ = 1 and R  2 = 0.32).

Table 1.

The association of ABCG5/8 variants with non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol, coronary artery disease, and gallstones

EA frequency (%) Non-HDL cholesterol (N up to 943 891)a  
CAD (N up to 147 825 cases/922 265 controls)b  
Gallstones (N up to 27 441 cases/738 791 controls)c  
ABCG-[5/8] Coding change rsName EA/non-EA Iceland/Denmark/UK Biobank/GLGC Β 95% CI P OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P
5 p.Phe624Leu rs150401285 G/A 0.031/0.138/0.098/0.065 0.19 (0.14, 0.25) 1.9 × 10−11 1.12 (0.96, 1.31) 0.16 0.37 (0.24, 0.57) 6.3 × 10−6
5 p.Met622Val rs140374206 C/T 0.104/0.541/0.649/0.503 0.05 (0.02, 0.07) 8.2 × 10−5 1.02 (0.96, 1.09) 0.5 0.70 (0.61, 0.82) 6.1 × 10−6
5 p.His250Tyr rs776502883 A/G 0.091/NA/NA/NA 0.58 (0.42, 0.75) 6.0 × 10−12 1.96 (1.35, 2.83) 3.9 × 10−4 0.80 (0.40, 1.61) 0.52
5 p.Arg198Gln rs141828689 T/C 0.145/0.157/0.132/0.138 0.16 (0.11, 0.21) 2.8 × 10−11 1.29 (1.11, 1.49) 6.2 × 10−4 0.42 (0.31, 0.59) 3.3 × 10−7
5 p.Phe125Leu NA G/A 0.027/NA/NA/NA 0.41 (0.11, 0.70) 6.5 × 10−3 2.48 (1.30, 4.71) 5.7 × 10−3 0.46 (0.12, 1.73) 0.25
5 p.Ala98Gly rs145164937 C/G 0.021/0.231/0.176/NA 0.11 (0.06, 0.17) 1.6 × 10−4 1.11 (0.96, 1.29) 0.16 0.42 (0.29, 0.60) 1.8 × 10−6
5 p.Gly27Ala rs56204478 G/C 0.072/0.358/0.354/NA 0.14 (0.10, 0.18) 2.7 × 10−13 1.08 (0.98, 1.19) 0.13 0.50 (0.42, 0.61) 4.5 × 10−12
8 p.Asp19His rs11887534 C/G 5.461/6.104/6.49/5.8 −0.11 (−0.11, −0.10) 3.5 × 10−203 0.93 (0.91, 0.95) 9.4 × 10−13 1.94 (1.87, 2.00) <1 × 10−300
8 intron rs4299376 G/T 27.958/29.541/31.667/25.17 0.07 (0.06, 0.07) 6.6 × 10−266 1.05 (1.04, 1.06) 1.1 × 10−22 0.80 (0.79, 0.82) 1.1 × 10−119
8 p.Glu238Lys rs34754243 A/G 0.019/0.292/0.162/NA −0.01 (−0.06, 0.05) 0.83 1.11 (0.97, 1.26) 0.13 1.51 (1.21, 1.89) 3.1 × 10−4
8 p.Arg263Gln rs137852990 A/G 0.117/NA/NA/0.013 0.17 (0.05, 0.29) 5.5 × 10−3 1.14 (0.81, 1.60) 0.5 0.41 (0.22, 0.75) 4.0 × 10−3
8 p.Gln271Arg rs770309304 G/A 0.106/NA/NA/NA 0.40 (0.25, 0.55) 2.9 × 10−7 1.36 (0.95, 1.96) 0.091 0.39 (0.20, 0.79) 8.2 × 10−3
8 p.Trp361Ter rs137852987 A/G 0.147/0.159/0.076/0.111 0.13 (0.08, 0.18) 9.9 × 10−8 1.14 (1.00, 1.31) 0.059 0.66 (0.48, 0.90) 8.5 × 10−3
8 p.Thr400Lys rs4148217 A/C 19.076/18.405/18.502/NA −0.04 (−0.05, −0.04) 2.8 × 10−48 0.97 (0.95, 0.98) 3.2 × 10−6 1.11 (1.09, 1.14) 6.8 × 10−19
8 p.Thr401Ser rs144200355 T/A 0.006/0.174/0.233/0.157 −0.09 (−0.14, −0.05) 5.7 × 10−6 0.91 (0.80, 1.03) 0.12 1.55 (1.27, 1.88) 1.3 × 10−5
8 p.Arg543Ser rs201690654 T/G 0.032/0.036/0.058/0.029 0.08 (−0.01, 0.16) 0.069 1.13 (0.86, 1.48) 0.39 0.35 (0.20, 0.62) 3.1 × 10−4

The effect (β) on non-HDL cholesterol is given in standard deviation units. p.Arg263Gln causes phytosterolemia in 2 Icelandic sisters. p. Phe125Leu has borderline significant association with non-HDL cholesterol and CAD.

CAD, coronary artery disease; CI, confidence interval; EA, effect allele; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; OR, odds ratio.

a

Combined Iceland (N = 139 033), Denmark (N = 113 038), UK Biobank (N = 358 461), and/or Global Lipids Genetics Consortium (GLGC) (N up to 333 359).

b

Combined Iceland (39 020 cases/319 620 controls), Denmark (33 603 cases/148 707 controls), UK Biobank (32 867 cases/375 698 controls), and CARDIoGRAM exome (42 335 cases/78 240 controls).

c

Combined Iceland (9024 cases/348 643 controls) and UK Biobank (18 417 cases/348 643 controls).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A schematic representation of the ABCG5/8 variant associations.

All six reported common variants associate with non-HDL cholesterol in our dataset (Supplementary material online, Table S1). However, these associations are fully captured by three variants with low pairwise correlation (R  2 ≤ 0.1; Supplementary material online, Table S3), p. Asp19His (rs11887534), the intronic rs4299376, and p. Thr400Lys (rs4148217) (Figure 2 and Supplementary material online, Table S3).

Next, we examined the association of the 35 rare coding and the 3 common variants with CAD in Iceland (39 020 cases and 319 620 controls) and in a meta-analysis of data from Iceland, Denmark, UK Biobank, and the public CARDIoGRAM Exome24 (combined up to 147 825 cases and 922 265 controls) (Table 1 and Supplementary material online, Table S4). Two rare variants associate with CAD (P <0.05/35 = 1.4 × 10−3), p. His250Tyr (OR = 1.96, P =3.9 × 10−4), and p. Arg198Gln (OR = 1.29, P =6.2 × 10−4), and both are predicted to have deleterious impact on the protein (Supplementary material online, Table S5). Furthermore, His250 is located in a highly conserved motive (GERP score =5.56; top 0.3% genome wide), the histidine loop (H-loop) in the nucleotide-binding domain of ABC transporters (Supplementary material online, Methods). We also replicate the CAD association of the common variants7  ,  8 (Table 1). The alleles of the five variants that associate with higher risk of CAD all associate with higher levels of non-HDL cholesterol.

The association of the 12 non-HDL cholesterol ABCG5/8 variants with other atherosclerosis-related phenotypes is shown in Supplementary material online, Table S6. We find several nominally significant associations between rare ABCG5/8 coding variants and other CVD. For example, p. His250Tyr that has the largest effect on non-HDL cholesterol and phytosterols and associates with CAD, also associates with aortic valve stenosis (P =0.0056), heart failure (P =0.0018), and sudden cardiac death (P =3.1 × 10−5).

None of the variants associates (at P <8.3 × 10−4, corrected for the number of variants and traits tested) with the atherosclerotic risk factors, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, body mass index, triglyceride, or HDL cholesterol, except the common intronic variant rs4299376 that has small effect on triglyceride levels (β = 0.0096, P =6.5 × 10−6) (Supplementary material online, Table S6).

Variant effects on phytosterol levels

We measured three of the most common phytosterols (sitosterol, campesterol, and stigmasterol) in serum from 3039 Icelanders, enriched for carriers of the rare coding variants in ABCG5/8 that associate with non-HDL cholesterol. Sufficiently many serum samples were available from carriers of seven rare variants and of those six associate with phytosterol levels. The variant p. His250Tyr with greatest effect on non-HDL cholesterol also has the greatest effect on all three phytosterols (β for stigmasterol =1.27 SD, P =2.2 × 10−15) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Association of ABCG5/8 variants with phytosterol levels

Stigmasterol
Sitosterol
Campesterol
(N = 3039)
(N = 3039)
(N = 3039)
ABCG-[5/8] Coding change rsName EA/non-EA N carriers measured EA frequency in measured samples (%) β (95% CI) P β (95% CI) P β (95% CI) P
5 p.Phe624Leu rs150401285 G/A 19 0.31 0.88 (0.37, 1.39) 6.9 × 10−4 0.85 (0.33, 1.37) 1.2 × 10−3 0.81 (0.30, 1.32) 1.7 ×10−3
5 p.His250Tyr rs776502883 A/G 50 0.82 1.27 (0.96, 1.58) 2.2 × 10−15 1.17 (0.86, 1.49) 3.9 × 10−13 1.10 (0.79, 1.41) 4.4 × 10−12
5 p.Arg198Gln rs141828689 T/C 54 0.89 0.20 (−0.09, 0.50) 0.18 0.29 (−0.01, 0.59) 0.056 0.30 (0.01, 0.59) 0.044
5 p.Gly27Ala rs56204478 G/C 51 0.84 0.49 (0.16, 0.82) 3.7 × 10−3 0.43 (0.09, 0.76) 0.012 0.40 (0.08, 0.73) 0.016
8 p.Asp19His rs11887534 C/G 266 4.38 −0.30 (−0.42, −0.18) 1.1 × 10−6 −0.32 (−0.45, −0.20) 1.6 × 10−7 −0.26 (−0.38, −0.13) 3.5 × 10−5
8 intronic rs4299376 G/T 1529 25.16 0.24 (0.19, 0.30) 2.6 × 10−17 0.27 (0.22, 0.33) 1.6 × 10−21 0.23 (0.18, 0.29) 3.1 × 10−16
8 p.Gln271Arg rs770309304 G/A 40 0.66 0.79 (0.46, 1.12) 2.6 × 10−6 0.90 (0.56, 1.23) 1.2 × 10−7 0.73 (0.40, 1.06) 1.3 × 10−5
8 p.Arg263Gln rs137852990 A/G 72 1.22 0.57 (0.33, 0.82) 3.6 × 10−6 0.45 (0.21, 0.69) 3.0 × 10−4 0.40 (0.15, 0.64) 1.3 × 10−3
8 p.Trp361Ter rs137852987 A/G 59 0.97 0.19 (−0.09, 0.47) 0.18 0.17 (−0.11, 0.45) 0.23 0.16 (-0.11,0.44) 0.25
8 p.Thr400Lys rs4148217 A/C 1049 17.26 −0.15 (−0.22, −0.09) 3.5 × 10−6 −0.16 (−0.23, −0.10) 1.6 × 10−7 −0.13 (−0.20, −0.07) 3.6 × 10−5

The effect (β) is given in standard deviation units. N carriers measured refers to the number of carriers with phytosterol measurements. EA frequency is for the phytosterol measured dataset, enriched with rare variant carriers.

CI, confidence interval; EA, effect allele.

In the Icelandic dataset, we identified seven homozygous or compound heterozygous carriers of rare ABCG5/8 coding variants. Two homozygous carriers of p. Arg263Gln in ABCG8 have extremely high phytosterol levels consistent with autosomal recessive phytosterolaemia (see Supplementary material online, Note).

In agreement with the role of the ABCG5/8 transporter in regulating intestinal absorption of both cholesterol and phytosterols, the ABCG5/8 variant effects on non-HDL cholesterol and phytosterol levels are highly correlated (R  2 = 0.97, Figure 3 and Supplementary material online, Table S7C and G). In the Icelandic data, 1 mmol/L increase in non-HDL cholesterol driven by the ABCG5/8 variants associates with 2.56 SD increase in stigmasterol levels (P =1.1 × 10−8). Two common NPC1L1 variants measured in our dataset associate with phytosterol levels (Supplementary material online, Table S7), but the phytosterol effect per unit change in non-HDL cholesterol is smaller than that observed for the ABCG5/8 variants (Figure 3). The apparent difference in the effects of NPC1L1 and ABCG5/8 variants on phytosterol levels is consistent with the non-selective uptake of sterols into enterocytes mediated by NPC1L1,1  ,  25 as opposed to the preferential excretion of phytosterols from enterocytes into the intestinal lumen mediated by ABCG5/8.1

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The relationship between variant effects on non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and stigmasterol. The crosses show 95% confidence intervals. SD, standard deviation units. The red (for ABCG5/8 variants) and black (for variants outside ABCG5/8 locus) lines are the best lines fitting the stigmasterol effects for non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol variants using weighted regression with one over standard error squared as weights. The grey-shaded area around the line is the 95% confidence interval. NPC1L1 variants are plotted in blue. See data in Supplementary material online, Table S7C and G.

Consistent correlation between effects on non-HDL cholesterol and phytosterol levels is not observed for non-HDL cholesterol associating variants outside the ABCG5/8 and NPC1L1 loci (R  2 = 0.13, P =0.0012, Figure 3 and Supplementary material online, Table S7).

Association with coronary artery disease is not fully explained by non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol

We then explored whether ABCG5/8 impacts the risk of CAD beyond what is expected by their effect on non-HDL cholesterol. We constructed 2 GRS for non-HDL cholesterol, one using ABCG5/8 variants (GRS-ABCG5/8) and another using reported variants outside the ABCG5/8 locus (GRS-other) (Supplementary material online, Methods, Table S7 and S8) and compared their effects on CAD in 85 544 cases and 648 442 controls/non-CAD cases from Iceland, Denmark, and UK Biobank (Table 3). NPC1L1 variants were not included in these GRSs. We scaled the units of the GRSs to mmol/L of non-HDL cholesterol and the odds ratios (OR) for CAD are calculated per 1 mmol/L of the genetically predicted increase in non-HDL cholesterol. The ABCG5/8 GRS associates with double the risk of CAD for a 1 mmol increase in non-HDL cholesterol (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.75–2.31; P =9.8 × 10−23, Table 3) compared with a 54% increase in CAD risk for GRS-other (OR = 1.54, 95% CI 1.49–1.59; P =1.1 × 10−154, P for difference in effects = 2.4 × 10−4). This greater effect of the GRS-ABCG5/8 on CAD indicates that there are atherogenic effects of ABCG5/8 variants that are not mediated through non-HDL cholesterol.

Table 3.

Disparate effects of genetic risk scores for non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol on the risk of coronary artery disease

GRS-other
GRS-ABCG5/8  
GRS-NPC1L1  
Non-HDL cholesterol variants, outside ABCG5/8 and NPC1L1 loci
Non-HDL cholesterol variants at ABCG5/8 locus
Non-HDL cholesterol variants at NPC1L1 locus
Cases/controls  OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P
Iceland 19 074/124 037 1.47 (1.37, 1.59) 1.3 × 10−23 1.96 (1.48, 2.58) 2.0 × 10−6 1.89 (1.18, 3.01) 0.0079
Denmark 33 603/148 707 1.64 (1.54, 1.75) 7.3 × 10−55 2.30 (1.63, 3.26) 2.5 × 10−6 2.94 (1.73, 5.00) 7.2 × 10−5
UK Biobank 32 867/375 698 1.51 (1.45, 1.58) 3.3 × 10−81 1.96 (1.63, 2.35) 4.9 × 10−13 1.64 (1.13, 2.37) 0.0087
Combined 85 544/648 442 1.54 (1.49, 1.59) 1.1 × 10−154 2.01 (1.75, 2.31) 9.8 × 10−23 1.95 (1.51, 2.52) 2.6 × 10−7
Phet (for difference in effects on CAD)
GRS-ABCG5/8 vs. GRS-other 2.4 × 10−4
GRS-NPC1L1 vs. GRS-other 0.067

The effects on CAD are given per 1 mmol/L of genetically elevated non-HDL cholesterol levels.

CAD, coronary artery disease; CI, confidence interval; GRS, genetic risk score; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; OR, odds ratio.

P  het: P-value for heterogeneity in effects.

For comparison, we examined the association of a GRS based on four NPC1L1 variants with CAD. Although the results for GRS-NPC1L1 were similar to GRS-ABCG5/8, there were fewer variants behind this risk score than for the GRS-ABCG5/8 resulting in less accurate CAD risk estimate. The CAD risk conferred by NPC1L1 variants was not significantly different from that expected by non-HDL cholesterol variants at other loci (P =0.067) (Table 3).

Association with gallstones and haematologic traits

Since the ABCG5/8 transporter is known to affect biliary cholesterol secretion and gallstone formation, we tested the 35 rare coding and 3 common variants for association with gallstone risk in a meta-analysis including data from Iceland and the UK Biobank (27 441 cases and 738 791 controls). We identified associations between eight rare coding variants and gallstones (P <1.4 × 10−3 = 0.05/35) and replicated the association of the common variants9  ,  10 (Table 1 and Supplementary material online, Table S9). We note that among eight rare variants that associate with gallstone risk, six also associate with non-HDL cholesterol, with the non-HDL cholesterol increasing alleles consistently associating with lower risk of gallstones (Table 1). However, we do not observe a clear dose–response relationship between variant effects on non-HDL cholesterol and on gallstones (Table 1 and Supplementary material online, Table S9).

Because of the reported macrothrombocytopenia and haemolytic anaemia in some phytosterolaemia patients,3 we tested ABCG5/8 variants for association with platelet traits and haemoglobin (Supplementary material online, Table S10). The three common variants associate with mean platelet volume (rs4299376: P =2.5 × 10−15, p. Asp19His: P =1.7 × 10−4, p. Thr400Lys: P =1.9 × 10−4) and with haemoglobin levels (rs4299376: P =0.030, p. Asp19His: P =3.2 × 10−8, p. Thr400Lys: P =3.3 × 10−4). Furthermore, the rare variant p. His250Tyr that has the largest effect on phytosterol levels, associates with greater mean platelet volume (P =5.7 × 10−3). The directions of the effects on platelet size and haemoglobin levels are consistent with those reported in phytosterolaemia (Supplementary material online, Table S10).

Discussion

We identified several rare ABCG5/8 coding variants with substantial impact on circulating levels of non-HDL cholesterol and phytosterols, and demonstrate that heterozygous carriers are at increased risk of CAD and other CVD (Take home figure).

Take home figure.

Take home figure

Genetic analysis using ABCG5/8 variants as instruments indicates that both dietary cholesterol and phytosterols contribute directly to atherogenesis.

The role of dietary cholesterol absorption in the regulation of circulating cholesterol and subsequent CVD is debated.15 We show that for variants at the ABCG5/8 locus, the effect on non-HDL cholesterol is highly correlated (R  2 = 0.97) with the effect on phytosterols that are only derived from the diet. This is consistent with the common mechanism of intestinal absorption of cholesterol and phytosterols, regulated by NPC1L1 and ABCG5/8 sterol transporters. Indeed, phytosterol levels are frequently used as surrogate markers of intestinal cholesterol absorption.26 Thus, the results indicate that increased intestinal absorption has a major contribution to the levels of cholesterol, although cholesterol removal through the liver may also play a role. However, less consistent relationship between variant effects on non-HDL cholesterol and on the formation of gallstones, a marker of cholesterol efflux to bile,27 suggests a smaller role for this mechanism. Furthermore, in carriers of the ABCG5/8 variants that associate with increased non-HDL cholesterol less cholesterol from the enterohepatic circulation is expected to be within the gut than in non-carriers since these variants associate with less secretion of cholesterol to bile. This suggests that the ABCG5/8 variants affect cholesterol levels in blood, mainly through regulation of dietary cholesterol absorption. Our findings thus provide mechanistic insights into how dietary cholesterol may affect CVD. A cautious view towards dietary cholesterol is also proposed by a recent large observational study, finding that higher consumption of dietary cholesterol associates with incident CVD and all-cause mortality in a dose-dependent manner.28 In line with what other studies have suggested (reviewed in Ref.29), our results support the opinion that ‘high cholesterol absorbers’ might benefit in particular from moderation in cholesterol intake and ezetimibe treatment.

The role of phytosterols in atherosclerotic disease is a matter of an ongoing dispute.18–20 We demonstrate that the degree of CAD risk conferred by ABCG5/8 variants is greater than predicted by their effect on non-HDL cholesterol levels. Based on the effect of non-HDL cholesterol variants in other genes than ABCG5/8 and NPC1L1 as reflected in GRS-other, non-HDL cholesterol can only explain around 62% of the CAD risk inferred from effect of variants in GRS-ABCG5/8 on CAD, the remaining 38% must be due to other mechanisms. The excess risk is unlikely driven through other traditional risk factors for CAD since the ABCG5/8 variants do not associate with them. In contrast, the rare and common ABCG5/8 variants have a consistent close relationship with phytosterol levels, making elevated phytosterol levels a plausible explanation for the excess CAD risk. The chemical relatedness to cholesterol also makes phytosterols credible atherogenic candidates. Evidence from humans with phytosterolaemia, from animal studies, and in vitro experiments further support atherogenic effect of phytosterols.3  ,  30  ,  31

While our results indicate that genetic susceptibility to high absorption of cholesterol and phytosterols increases the risk of CAD, the total and relative amount of these dietary components in the gut may also play a role in the net absorption. Thus, high intakes may increase absorption because of more availability. However, phytosterols in the diet may also reduce intraluminal availability of cholesterol, through physicochemical interferance.21

While our findings raise concerns about the safety of phytosterol-supplemented food, given their propensity to raise phytosterol levels in blood,21 harmful effects of phytosterol supplementation cannot be concluded based on our data. Ultimately, it needs to be established in clinical trials whether the non-HDL/LDL cholesterol-lowering effects of phytosterol-supplemented food products truly lower cardiovascular risk, or whether swapping the cholesterol with another atherogenic lipid might override this effect, or possibly increase risk.

The main limitation to our study is that we cannot demonstrate directly the dietary origin of the non-HDL cholesterol in blood. Neither was our study equipped to address the effects of various proportions of cholesterol and phytosterols in diet on the amount absorbed, or on the effect on CVD.

In conclusion, we used genetics to demonstrate a role of dietary cholesterol in the regulation of non-HDL cholesterol levels and the risk of CVD. Furthermore, other dietary sterols such as phytosterols may contribute directly to atherogenesis.

Supplementary Material

ehaa531_Supplementary_Data

Acknowledgements

We thank all the individuals who participated in the study and whose contribution made this work possible as well as our colleagues who contributed to data collection, sample handling, and genotyping. This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under Application Number ‘24711’. Data on coronary artery disease have been contributed by the Myocardial Infarction Genetics and CARDIoGRAM Exome investigators and have been downloaded from www.CARDIOGRAMPLUSC4D.ORG. Data on blood lipids were contributed by the Global Lipids Genetics Consortium and was downloaded from http://csg.sph.umich.edu/willer/public/lipids2017EastAsian/.

Funding

This work was supported by deCODE genetics/Amgen. S.B. is supported by the Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF14CC0001 and NNF17OC0027594). F.W.A. is supported by University College London Hospital National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre (BRC288A).

Conflict of interest: The authors affiliated with deCODE genetics/Amgen, Inc. are employed by the company.

Contributor Information

Anna Helgadottir, deCODE genetics/Amgen, Inc., Sturlugata 8, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland.

Gudmar Thorleifsson, deCODE genetics/Amgen, Inc., Sturlugata 8, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland.

Kristjan F Alexandersson, deCODE genetics/Amgen, Inc., Sturlugata 8, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland.

Vinicius Tragante, deCODE genetics/Amgen, Inc., Sturlugata 8, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland; Department of Cardiology, Division Heart & Lungs, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Margret Thorsteinsdottir, ArcticMass, Sturlugata 8, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland; Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Iceland, Hofsvallagata 53, 107 Reykjavik, Iceland.

Finnur F Eiriksson, ArcticMass, Sturlugata 8, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland.

Solveig Gretarsdottir, deCODE genetics/Amgen, Inc., Sturlugata 8, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland.

Eythór Björnsson, deCODE genetics/Amgen, Inc., Sturlugata 8, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland; Department of Internal Medicine, Landspitali – National University Hospital of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Vatnsmýrarvegur, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.

Olafur Magnusson, deCODE genetics/Amgen, Inc., Sturlugata 8, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland.

Gardar Sveinbjornsson, deCODE genetics/Amgen, Inc., Sturlugata 8, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland.

Ingileif Jonsdottir, deCODE genetics/Amgen, Inc., Sturlugata 8, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Vatnsmýrarvegur, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.

Valgerdur Steinthorsdottir, deCODE genetics/Amgen, Inc., Sturlugata 8, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland.

Egil Ferkingstad, deCODE genetics/Amgen, Inc., Sturlugata 8, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland.

Brynjar Ö Jensson, deCODE genetics/Amgen, Inc., Sturlugata 8, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland.

Hreinn Stefansson, deCODE genetics/Amgen, Inc., Sturlugata 8, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland.

Isleifur Olafsson, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Landspitali –National University Hospital of Iceland, Hringbraut, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.

Alex H Christensen, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte Hospitalsvej 1, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark.

Christian Torp-Pedersen, Department of Cardiology and Clinical Research, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Dyrehavevej 29, 3400 Hillerød, Denmark; Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark.

Lars Køber, The Capital Region’s Unit of Inherited Cardiac Diseases, Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Ole B Pedersen, Department of Clinical Immunology, Næstved Hospital, Ringstedgade 61, 4700 Næstved, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Christian Erikstrup, Department of Clinical Immunology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark.

Erik Sørensen, Department of Clinical Immunology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Søren Brunak, Translational Disease Systems Biology, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Karina Banasik, Translational Disease Systems Biology, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Thomas F Hansen, Translational Disease Systems Biology, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Glostrup, Rigshospitalet, Valdemar Hansens vej 1-23, 2600 Glostrup, Denmark; Institute for Biological Psychiatry, Mental Health Center Sct. Hans, Boserupvej 2, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.

Mette Nyegaard, Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Høegh-Guldbergs Gade 10, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark.

Gudmundur I Eyjolfssson, The Laboratory in Mjodd, Thonglabakki 6, 109 Reykjavik, Iceland.

Olof Sigurdardottir, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Akureyri Hospital, Eyrarlandsvegur, 600 Akureyri, Iceland.

Bjorn L Thorarinsson, Department of Neurology, Landspitali – National University Hospital of Iceland, Hringbraut, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.

Stefan E Matthiasson, Laekning, Medical Clinics, Lágmúli 5, 108 Reykjavik, Iceland.

Thora Steingrimsdottir, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Vatnsmýrarvegur, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Landspitali – National University Hospital, Hringbraut, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.

Einar S Bjornsson, Department of Internal Medicine, Landspitali – National University Hospital of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Vatnsmýrarvegur, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.

Ragnar Danielsen, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Landspitali – National University Hospital of Iceland, Hringbraut, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.

Folkert W Asselbergs, Department of Cardiology, Division Heart & Lungs, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands; Institute of Cardiovascular Science, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK; Health Data Research UK and Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.

David O Arnar, deCODE genetics/Amgen, Inc., Sturlugata 8, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Vatnsmýrarvegur, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland; Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Landspitali – National University Hospital of Iceland, Hringbraut, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.

Henrik Ullum, Department of Clinical Immunology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Henning Bundgaard, The Capital Region’s Unit of Inherited Cardiac Diseases, Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Patrick Sulem, deCODE genetics/Amgen, Inc., Sturlugata 8, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland.

Unnur Thorsteinsdottir, deCODE genetics/Amgen, Inc., Sturlugata 8, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Vatnsmýrarvegur, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.

Gudmundur Thorgeirsson, deCODE genetics/Amgen, Inc., Sturlugata 8, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Vatnsmýrarvegur, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland; Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Landspitali – National University Hospital of Iceland, Hringbraut, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.

Hilma Holm, deCODE genetics/Amgen, Inc., Sturlugata 8, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland.

Daniel F Gudbjartsson, deCODE genetics/Amgen, Inc., Sturlugata 8, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland; School of Engineering and Natural Sciences, University of Iceland, Dunhagi, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.

Kari Stefansson, deCODE genetics/Amgen, Inc., Sturlugata 8, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Vatnsmýrarvegur, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.

References

  • 1. Lammert  F, Wang  D-H.  New insights into the genetic regulation of intestinal cholesterol absorption. Gastroenterology  2005;129:718–734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Sudhop  T, LüTjohann  D, Kodal  A, Igel  M, Tribble  DL, Shah  S, Perevozskaya  I, von Bergmann  K.  Inhibition of intestinal cholesterol absorption by ezetimibe in humans. Circulation  2002;106:1943–1948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Ajagbe  BO, Othman  RA, Myrie  SB.  Plant sterols, stanols, and sitosterolemia. J AOAC Int  2015;98:716–723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kolovou  G, Voudris  V, Drogari  E, Palatianos  G, Cokkinos  DV.  Coronary bypass grafts in a young girl with sitosterolemia. Eur Heart J  1996;17:965–966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Teslovich  TM, Musunuru  K, Smith  AV, Edmondson  AC, Stylianou  IM, Koseki  M, Pirruccello  JP, Ripatti  S, Chasman  DI, Willer  CJ, Johansen  CT, Fouchier  SW, Isaacs  A, Peloso  GM, Barbalic  M, Ricketts  SL, Bis  JC, Aulchenko  YS, Thorleifsson  G, Feitosa  MF, Chambers  J, Orho-Melander  M, Melander  O, Johnson  T, Li  X, Guo  X, Li  M, Shin Cho  Y, Jin Go  M, Jin Kim  Y, Lee  J-Y, Park  T, Kim  K, Sim  X, Twee-Hee Ong  R, Croteau-Chonka  DC, Lange  LA, Smith  JD, Song  K, Hua Zhao  J, Yuan  X, Luan  J, Lamina  C, Ziegler  A, Zhang  W, Zee  RYL, Wright  AF, Witteman  JCM, Wilson  JF, Willemsen  G, Wichmann  H-E, Whitfield  JB, Waterworth  DM, Wareham  NJ, Waeber  G, Vollenweider  P, Voight  BF, Vitart  V, Uitterlinden  AG, Uda  M, Tuomilehto  J, Thompson  JR, Tanaka  T, Surakka  I, Stringham  HM, Spector  TD, Soranzo  N, Smit  JH, Sinisalo  J, Silander  K, Sijbrands  EJG, Scuteri  A, Scott  J, Schlessinger  D, Sanna  S, Salomaa  V, Saharinen  J, Sabatti  C, Ruokonen  A, Rudan  I, Rose  LM, Roberts  R, Rieder  M, Psaty  BM, Pramstaller  PP, Pichler  I, Perola  M, Penninx  BWJH, Pedersen  NL, Pattaro  C, Parker  AN, Pare  G, Oostra  BA, O’Donnell  CJ, Nieminen  MS, Nickerson  DA, Montgomery  GW, Meitinger  T, McPherson  R, McCarthy  MI, McArdle  W, Masson  D, Martin  NG, Marroni  F, Mangino  M, Magnusson  PKE, Lucas  G, Luben  R, Loos  RJF, Lokki  M-L, Lettre  G, Langenberg  C, Launer  LJ, Lakatta  EG, Laaksonen  R, Kyvik  KO, Kronenberg  F, König  IR, Khaw  K-T, Kaprio  J, Kaplan  LM, Johansson  Å, Jarvelin  M-R, Cecile  J. W., Janssens  A, Ingelsson  E, Igl  W, Kees Hovingh  G, Hottenga  J-J, Hofman  A, Hicks  AA, Hengstenberg  C, Heid  IM, Hayward  C, Havulinna  AS, Hastie  ND, Harris  TB, Haritunians  T, Hall  AS, Gyllensten  U, Guiducci  C, Groop  LC, Gonzalez  E, Gieger  C, Freimer  NB, Ferrucci  L, Erdmann  J, Elliott  P, Ejebe  KG, Döring  A, Dominiczak  AF, Demissie  S, Deloukas  P, de Geus  EJC, de Faire  U, Crawford  G, Collins  FS, Chen  Y-D. I, Caulfield  MJ, Campbell  H, Burtt  NP, Bonnycastle  LL, Boomsma  DI, Boekholdt  SM, Bergman  RN, Barroso  I, Bandinelli  S, Ballantyne  CM, Assimes  TL, Quertermous  T, Altshuler  D, Seielstad  M, Wong  TY, Tai  E-S, Feranil  AB, Kuzawa  CW, Adair  LS, Taylor  HA  Jr, Borecki  IB, Gabriel  SB, Wilson  JG, Holm  H, Thorsteinsdottir  U, Gudnason  V, Krauss  RM, Mohlke  KL, Ordovas  JM, Munroe  PB, Kooner  JS, Tall  AR, Hegele  RA, Kastelein  JJP, Schadt  EE, Rotter  JI, Boerwinkle  E, Strachan  DP, Mooser  V, Stefansson  K, Reilly  MP, Samani  NJ, Schunkert  H, Cupples  LA, Sandhu  MS, Ridker  PM, Rader  DJ, van Duijn  CM, Peltonen  L, Abecasis  GR, Boehnke  M, Kathiresan  S.  Biological, clinical and population relevance of 95 loci for blood lipids. Nature  2010;466:707–713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Aulchenko  YS, Ripatti  S, Lindqvist  I, Boomsma  D, Heid  IM, Pramstaller  PP, Penninx  B, Janssens  A, Wilson  JF, Spector  T, Martin  NG, Pedersen  NL, Kyvik  KO, Kaprio  J, Hofman  A, Freimer  NB, Jarvelin  M-R, Gyllensten  U, Campbell  H, Rudan  I, Johansson  A, Marroni  F, Hayward  C, Vitart  V, Jonasson  I, Pattaro  C, Wright  A, Hastie  N, Pichler  I, Hicks AA, Falchi M, Willemsen G, Hottenga JJ, de Geus EJ, Montgomery GW, Whitfield J, Magnusson P, Saharinen J, Perola M, Silander K, Isaacs A, Sijbrands EJ, Uitterlinden AG, Witteman JC, Oostra BA, Elliott P, Ruokonen A, Sabatti C, Gieger C, Meitinger T, Kronenberg F, Döring A, Wichmann HE, Smit JH, McCarthy MI, van Duijn CM, Peltonen  L.  Loci influencing lipid levels and coronary heart disease risk in 16 European population cohorts. Nat Genet  2009;41:47–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Stender  S, Frikke-Schmidt  R, Nordestgaard  BG, Tybjærg-Hansen  A.  The ABCG5/8 cholesterol transporter and myocardial infarction versus gallstone disease. J Am Coll Cardiol  2014;63:2121–2128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Teupser  D, Baber  R, Ceglarek  U, Scholz  M, Illig  T, Gieger  C, Holdt  LM, Leichtle  A, Greiser  KH, Huster  D, Linsel-Nitschke  P, Schäfer  A, Braund  PS, Tiret  L, Stark  K, Raaz-Schrauder  D, Fiedler  GM, Wilfert  W, Beutner  F, Gielen  S, Großhennig  A, König  IR, Lichtner  P, Heid  IM, Kluttig  A, El Mokhtari  NE, Rubin  D, Ekici  AB, Reis  A, Garlichs  CD, Hall  AS, Matthes  G, Wittekind  C, Hengstenberg  C, Cambien  F, Schreiber  S, Werdan  K, Meitinger  T, Loeffler  M, Samani  NJ, Erdmann  J, Wichmann  H-E, Schunkert  H, Thiery  J.  Genetic regulation of serum phytosterol levels and risk of coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Genet  2010;3:331–339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Buch  S, Schafmayer  C, Völzke  H, Becker  C, Franke  A, Eller-Eberstein  H V, Kluck  C, Bässmann  I, Brosch  M, Lammert  F, Miquel  JF, Nervi  F, Wittig  M, Rosskopf  D, Timm  B, Höll  C, Seeger  M, ElSharawy  A, Lu  T, Egberts  J, Fändrich  F, Fölsch  UR, Krawczak  M, Schreiber  S, Nürnberg  P, Tepel  J, Hampe  J.  A genome-wide association scan identifies the hepatic cholesterol transporter ABCG8 as a susceptibility factor for human gallstone disease. Nat Genet  2007;39:995–999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Joshi  AD, Andersson  C, Buch  S, Stender  S, Noordam  R, Weng  L-C, Weeke  PE, Auer  PL, Boehm  B, Chen  C, Choi  H, Curhan  G, Denny  JC, De Vivo  I, Eicher  JD, Ellinghaus  D, Folsom  AR, Fuchs  C, Gala  M, Haessler  J, Hofman  A, Hu  F, Hunter  DJ, Janssen  HLA, Kang  JH, Kooperberg  C, Kraft  P, Kratzer  W, Lieb  W, Lutsey  PL, Darwish Murad  S, Nordestgaard  BG, Pasquale  LR, Reiner  AP, Ridker  PM, Rimm  E, Rose  LM, Shaffer  CM, Schafmayer  C, Tamimi  RM, Uitterlinden  AG, Völker  U, Völzke  H, Wakabayashi  Y, Wiggs  JL, Zhu  J, Roden  DM, Stricker  BH, Tang  W, Teumer  A, Hampe  J, Tybjærg-Hansen  A, Chasman  DI, Chan  AT, Johnson  AD.  Four susceptibility loci for gallstone disease identified in a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. Gastroenterology  2016;151:351–363.e28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Stitziel NO, Won HH, Morrison AC, Peloso GM, Do R, Lange LA, Fontanillas P, Gupta N, Duga S, Goel A, Farrall M, Saleheen D, Ferrario P, König I, Asselta R, Merlini PA, Marziliano N, Notarangelo MF, Schick U, Auer P, Assimes TL, Reilly M, Wilensky R, Rader DJ, Hovingh GK, Meitinger T, Kessler T, Kastrati A, Laugwitz KL, Siscovick D, Rotter JI, Hazen SL, Tracy R, Cresci S, Spertus J, Jackson R, Schwartz SM, Natarajan P, Crosby J, Muzny D, Ballantyne C, Rich SS, O'Donnell CJ, Abecasis G, Sunaev S, Nickerson DA, Buring JE, Ridker PM, Chasman DI, Austin E, Kullo IJ, Weeke PE, Shaffer CM, Bastarache LA, Denny JC, Roden DM, Palmer C, Deloukas P, Lin DY, Tang ZZ, Erdmann J, Schunkert H, Danesh J, Marrugat J, Elosua R, Ardissino D, McPherson R, Watkins H, Reiner AP, Wilson JG, Altshuler D, Gibbs RA, Lander ES, Boerwinkle E, Gabriel S, Kathiresan S. Inactivating mutations in NPC1L1 and protection from coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med  2014;371:2072–2082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Cohen  JC, Pertsemlidis  A, Fahmi  S, Esmail  S, Vega  GL, Grundy  SM, Hobbs  HH.  Multiple rare variants in NPC1L1 associated with reduced sterol absorption and plasma low-density lipoprotein levels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A  2006;103:1810–1815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Ference  BA, Ginsberg  HN, Graham  I, Ray  KK, Packard  CJ, Bruckert  E, Hegele  RA, Krauss  RM, Raal  FJ, Schunkert  H, Watts  GF, Borén  J, Fazio  S, Horton  JD, Masana  L, Nicholls  SJ, Nordestgaard  BG, van de Sluis  B, Taskinen  M-R, Tokgözoğlu  L, Landmesser  U, Laufs  U, Wiklund  O, Stock  JK, Chapman  MJ, Catapano  AL.  Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. A consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Eur Heart J  2017;38:2459–2472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Helgadottir  A, Gretarsdottir  S, Thorleifsson  G, Hjartarson  E, Sigurdsson  A, Magnusdottir  A, Jonasdottir  A, Kristjansson  H, Sulem  P, Oddsson  A, Sveinbjornsson  G, Steinthorsdottir  V, Rafnar  T, Masson  G, Jonsdottir  I, Olafsson  I, Eyjolfsson  GI, Sigurdardottir  O, Daneshpour  MS, Khalili  D, Azizi  F, Swinkels  DW, Kiemeney  L, Quyyumi  AA, Levey  AI, Patel  RS, Hayek  SS, Gudmundsdottir  IJ, Thorgeirsson  G, Thorsteinsdottir  U, Gudbjartsson  DF, Holm  H, Stefansson  K.  Variants with large effects on blood lipids and the role of cholesterol and triglycerides in coronary disease. Nat Genet  2016;48:634–639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Grundy  SM.  Does dietary cholesterol matter?  Curr Atheroscler Rep  2016;18:68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Millen  BE, Abrams  S, Adams-Campbell  L, Anderson  CA, Brenna  JT, Campbell  WW, Clinton  S, Hu  F, Nelson  M, Neuhouser  ML, Perez-Escamilla  R, Siega-Riz  AM, Story  M, Lichtenstein  AH.  The 2015 dietary guidelines advisory committee scientific report: development and major conclusions. Adv Nutr  2016;7:438–444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Mach  F, Baigent  C, Catapano  AL, Koskinas  KC, Casula  M, Badimon  L, Chapman Mj Backer  GGD, Delgado  V, Ference  BA, Graham  IM, Halliday  A, Landmesser  U, Mihaylova  B, Pedersen  TR, Riccardi  G, Richter  DJ, Sabatine  MS, Taskinen  MR, Tokgozoglu  L, Wiklund  O; ESC Scientific Document Group.  2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: Lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J  2020;41:111–188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Weingärtner  O, Böhm  M, Laufs  U.  Controversial role of plant sterol esters in the management of hypercholesterolaemia. Eur Heart J  2008;30:404–409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Wilund  KR, Yu  L, Xu  F, Vega  GL, Grundy  SM, Cohen  JC, Hobbs  HH.  No association between plasma levels of plant sterols and atherosclerosis in mice and men. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol  2004;24:2326–2332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Hansel  B, Carrié  A, Brun-Druc  N, Leclert  G, Chantepie  S, Coiffard  A-S, Kahn  J-F, Chapman  MJ, Bruckert  E.  Premature atherosclerosis is not systematic in phytosterolemic patients: severe hypercholesterolemia as a confounding factor in five subjects. Atherosclerosis  2014;234:162–168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Gylling  H, Plat  J, Turley  S, Ginsberg  HN, Ellegård  L, Jessup  W, Jones  PJ, Lütjohann  D, Maerz  W, Masana  L, Silbernagel  G, Staels  B, Borén  J, Catapano  AL, Backer  GD, Deanfield  J, Descamps  OS, Kovanen  PT, Riccardi  G, Tokgözoglu  L, Chapman  MJ; European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel on Phytosterols. Plant sterols and plant stanols in the management of dyslipidaemia and prevention of cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis  2014;232:346–360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Brunner  FJ, Waldeyer  C, Ojeda  F, Salomaa  V, Kee  F, Sans  S, Thorand  B, Giampaoli  S, Brambilla  P, Tunstall-Pedoe  H, Moitry  M, Iacoviello  L, Veronesi  G, Grassi  G, Mathiesen  EB, Söderberg  S, Linneberg  A, Brenner  H, Amouyel  P, Ferrières  J, Tamosiunas  A, Nikitin  YP, Drygas  W, Melander  O, Jöckel  K-H, Leistner  DM, Shaw  JE, Panagiotakos  DB, Simons  LA, Kavousi M, Vasan RS, Dullaart RPF, Wannamethee SG, Risérus U, Shea S, de Lemos JA, Omland T, Kuulasmaa K, Landmesser U, Blankenberg S; Multinational Cardiovascular Risk Consortium. Application of non-HDL cholesterol for population-based cardiovascular risk stratification: results from the Multinational Cardiovascular Risk Consortium. Lancet  2019;394:2173–2183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Lu  X, Peloso  GM, Liu  DJ, Wu  Y, Zhang  H, Zhou  W, Li  J, Tang  C. S-M, Dorajoo  R, Li  H, Long  J, Guo  X, Xu  M, Spracklen  CN, Chen  Y, Liu  X, Zhang  Y, Khor  CC, Liu  J, Sun  L, Wang  L, Gao  Y-T, Hu  Y, Yu  K, Wang  Y, Cheung  CYY, Wang  F, Huang  J, Fan  Q, Cai  Q, Chen  S, Shi  J, Yang  X, Zhao  W, Sheu  WH-H, Cherny  SS, He  M, Feranil  AB, Adair  LS, Gordon-Larsen  P, Du  S, Varma  R, Chen  Y-DI, Shu  X-O, Lam  KSL, Wong  TY, Ganesh  SK, Mo  Z, Hveem  K, Fritsche  LG, Nielsen  JB, Tse  H-F, Huo  Y, Cheng  C-Y, Chen  YE, Zheng  W, Tai  ES, Gao  W, Lin  X, Huang  W, Abecasis  G, Kathiresan  S, Mohlke  KL, Wu  T, Sham  PC, Gu  D, Willer  CJ; GLGC Consortium. Exome chip meta-analysis identifies novel loci and East Asian–specific coding variants that contribute to lipid levels and coronary artery disease. Nat Genet  2017;49:1722–1730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Stitziel  NO, Stirrups  KE, Masca  NGD, Erdmann  J, Ferrario  PG, König  IR, Weeke  PE, Webb  TR, Auer  PL, Schick  UM, Lu  Y, Zhang  H, Dube  M-P, Goel  A, Farrall  M, Peloso  GM, Won  H-H, Do  R, Iperen  E. V, Kanoni  S, Kruppa  J, Mahajan  A, Scott  RA, Willenberg  C, Braund  PS, Capelleveen  JC, van Doney  ASF, Donnelly  LA; Myocardial Infarction Genetics and CARDIoGRAM Exome Consortia Investigator. Coding variation in ANGPTL4, LPL, and SVEP1 and the risk of coronary disease. N Engl J Med  2016;374:1134–1144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Davis  HR, Zhu  LJ, Hoos  LM, Tetzloff  G, Maguire  M, Liu  J, Yao  X, Iyer  SPN, Lam  MH, Lund  EG, Detmers  PA, Graziano  MP, Altmann  SW.  Niemann-Pick C1 like 1 (NPC1L1) is the intestinal phytosterol and cholesterol transporter and a key modulator of whole-body cholesterol homeostasis. J Biol Chem  2004;279:33586–33592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Matthan  NR, Lichtenstein  AH.  Approaches to measuring cholesterol absorption in humans. Atherosclerosis  2004;174:197–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Marschall  H-U, Einarsson  C.  Gallstone disease. J Intern Med  2007;261:529–542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Zhong  VW, Horn  LV, Cornelis  MC, Wilkins  JT, Ning  H, Carnethon  MR, Greenland  P, Mentz  RJ, Tucker  KL, Zhao  L, Norwood  AF, Lloyd-Jones  DM, Allen  NB.  Associations of dietary cholesterol or egg consumption with incident cardiovascular disease and mortality. JAMA  2019;321:1081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Lütjohann  D, Stellaard  F, Mulder  MT, Sijbrands  EJG, Weingärtner  O.  The emerging concept of ‘individualized cholesterol-lowering therapy’: a change in paradigm. Pharmacol Ther  2019;199:111–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Weingärtner  O, Teupser  D, Patel  SB.  The atherogenicity of plant sterols: the evidence from genetics to clinical trials. J AOAC Int  2015;98:742–749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Bao  L, Li  Y, Deng  S-X, Landry  D, Tabas  I.  Sitosterol-containing lipoproteins trigger free sterol-induced caspase-independent death in ACAT-competent macrophages. J Biol Chem  2006;281:33635–33649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ehaa531_Supplementary_Data

Articles from European Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES