Abstract
N-Sulfonylhydrazones derived from alkyl, aryl, and heteroaryl aldehydes and ketones undergo rapid conversion into the corresponding sulfinates when heated with 10 mol % K2CO3 in N,N′-dimethylethylene urea (DMEU) at elevated temperature. The reaction conditions are amenable to several functional groups and suitable for gram-scale synthesis. Under these base-catalyzed conditions, N-tosylhydrazones derived from O-allylated and O-propargylated 2-hydroxyarylaldehydes do not undergo the well-established intramolecular [3 + 2]-cycloaddition reactions and generate corresponding sulfinates in good yields. The base-catalyzed transformation proceeds via crucial rapid intermolecular protonation of the diazo intermediate 11 to generate diazonium ion 12, which upon nucleophilic displacement by the sulfonyl ion 10 provides the desired sulfinate selectively.
Introduction
Sulfinates are a class of sulfur-containing molecular entities that are important in terms of their biological activities as well as from the synthetic point of view.1 A few sulfinates have been reported to exhibit cytotoxic activity against leukemia cell lines in humans.2 Sulfinates also act as bioluminescent sensors for the detection of thiols in living cells.3 Synthetically, sulfinates have acquired considerable importance owing to their elegant dual reactivity as electrophiles or as nucleophiles under suitable reaction conditions.4 Chiral sulfinates are often utilized as convenient building blocks in the asymmetric synthesis of sulfur-containing compounds such as sulfoxides and sulfonamides.5 Due to these widespread applications, a great deal of attention has been paid by the synthetic community across the globe for the development of suitable methods for the synthesis of sulfinates using commercially/readily available starting materials.
Scheme 1 outlines the summary of recent important methods reported in the literature for the synthesis of achiral sulfinates. Electrochemical6 as well as transition-metal7-catalyzed oxidation of thiols in the presence of suitable alcohols under aerobic conditions has been employed to generate corresponding sulfinates in good yields (Scheme 1a). Interestingly, thiols have also been converted into tert-butylsulfinates by treating with a TBHP/TBAI mixture.8 Under an oxygen atmosphere, Cu(OTf)2 catalyzes the conversion of arylsulfonylhydrazides to arylsulfinyl radicals, which couple with suitable alcohols to generate sulfinates (Scheme 1b).9tert-Butyl sulfoxides could also be converted into sulfinates by treating with alcohols in the presence of NBS-AcOH in dichloromethane (Scheme 1c).10 In the presence of a stoichiometric amount of suitable activators such as BF3·OEt2,11a TMSCl,11b and H2SO4,11c alcohols undergo condensation with sodium sulfinate to generate various sulfinates in good yields (Scheme 1d). Recently, p-toluenesulfonylmethyl isocyanide (TosMIC) in combination with a wide variety of alcohols has been utilized to generate sulfinate under BiBr3-catalyzed mild acidic conditions (Scheme 1e).2 Intriguingly, TosMIC has also been found to be a suitable reagent for the conversion of alcohols to sulfinates under Mitsunobu conditions (Scheme 1f).12
Scheme 1. Recent Methods for Achiral Sulfinate Synthesis.
In the past decade, N-tosylhydrazones, owing to their easy availability and stability toward bench-storage and distinctive modes of reactivity, have emerged as an important counterpart in transition-metal-catalyzed13 as well as transition-metal-free cross-coupling14 reactions. In the presence of a suitable base, N-tosylhydrazones undergo decomposition via the Bamford–Stevens reaction.15 To this end, an extensive study of solvent-dependent base-mediated decomposition of N-tosylhydrazones has been reported by Wei et al.16a When treated with a suitable base, N-tosylhydrazones yield dialkylidenehydrazines and oximes in appropriate solvents.16a The sulfonyl anion, evolved during the base-promoted decomposition of N-tosylhydrazones, couples with the metallocarbene generated in the presence of transition metals (Cu, Fe, and Rh) under suitable conditions to furnish synthetically important sulfones (Scheme 2a).17 On the contrary, N-tosylhydrazones give corresponding sulfinates when heated with a stoichiometric amount of stabilized Wittig ylide in N,N′-dimethylpropylene urea (DMPU) at elevated temperature under transition-metal-free conditions (Scheme 2b).18 Adding to this development, in a very recent report, Wu et al. have demonstrated that sulfinates could also be obtained selectively when N-tosylhydrazones are heated with a stoichiometric amount of diisopropylethyl amine in nitromethane at 90 °C (Scheme 2c).19 Nonetheless, it is worth noting that, as per mechanism, the conversion of N-tosylhydrazone to the corresponding sulfinate should be catalytic with a base. However, unfortunately, the previous methods fail to give a complete conversion with a catalytic amount of base/promoter.18,19 A catalytic process would reduce the operational cost and waste generation and render practicality to this relatively new transformation. Herein, we report the development of a K2CO3-catalyzed rapid conversion of N-tosylhydrazones to sulfinates in N,N′-dimethylethylene urea (DMEU) at elevated temperature.20
Scheme 2. Conversion of N-Tosylhydrazone to Sulfone and Sulfinate.
Results and Discussion
In our recent investigation, we observed that the reaction of N-tosylhydrazone 1j in the presence of 2.5 equiv of K2CO3 in N,N-dimethyl formamide (DMF) at 110 °C did not undergo the hypothesized21 intramolecular C–C bond-forming reaction to produce the anticipated ethyl-2,3-dihydrobenzofuran-2-carboxylate 2 but gave 66% yield of sulfinate 3j and a small amount of sulfone 4j (Scheme 3). Also, similar results were obtained when 1.0 equiv of K2CO3 was used for the transformation. Close inspection of the reaction mixture revealed that most of the insoluble K2CO3 remained unreacted during the course of the reaction. This prompted us to carry out the reaction with a catalytic amount of base. To our delight, a complete conversion of N-tosylhydrazone was also observed using 10 mol % K2CO3 to give sulfinate 3j and sulfone 4j in 70 and 8% yields, respectively (entry b, Table 1). Smooth decomposition of N-tosylhydrazone 1j in N-methylpyrrolidinone (NMP) as the solvent also provided sulfinate 3j in 76% yield and a small amount of sulfone 4j (entry c, Table 1). When DMPU was used as a solvent, 78% yield of sulfinate 3j and only a trace amount of sulfone 4j were obtained (entry d, Table 1). Selective formation of sulfinate in high yield (80%) was also obtained in DMEU with 10 mol % K2CO3 at 110 °C (entry e, Table 1). Other alkali metal carbonates (Li2CO3, Na2CO3, and Cs2CO3) were also tested for the reaction in DMEU; however, inferior results were obtained when compared to K2CO3 (entries f–h, Table 1). This suggests that the countercations of alkali metal carbonates play an important role in the overall outcome of the reaction. The reaction with Li2CO3, which is weakly basic, provided slow transformation, and only about 75% conversion (60% yield) occurred after 1 h. Na2CO3 showed comparable reactivity with K2CO3 but gave a slightly lower yield (70%) of sulfinate 3j. The reaction with Cs2CO3 was quick, but low yield (65%) was observed due to partial decomposition to unidentified polar compounds. Importantly, no reaction was observed when KHCO3 was used as the base in DMEU at 110 °C (entry i, Table 1).
Scheme 3. Initial Results.
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditions for Sulfinate Synthesis.
| yield
(%) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| entry | base (equiv) | conditionsa | 3j | 4j |
| a | K2CO3 (1.0) | DMF, 110 °C, 10 min | 67 | 10 |
| b | K2CO3 (0.1) | DMF, 110 °C, 10 min | 70 | 8 |
| c | K2CO3 (0.1) | NMP, 110 °C, 10 min | 76 | 5 |
| d | K2CO3 (0.1) | DMPU, 110 °C, 10 min | 78 | trace |
| e | K2CO3 (0.1) | DMEU, 110 °C, 10 min | 80 | trace |
| f | Li2CO3 (0.1) | DMEU, 110 °C, 1 hb | 60 | trace |
| g | Na2CO3 (0.1) | DMEU, 110 °C, 30 min | 70 | trace |
| h | Cs2CO3 (0.1) | DMEU, 110 °C, 10 min | 65 | trace |
| i | KHCO3 (0.1) | DMEU, 110 °C, 10 min | NR | |
All reactions were carried out in 0.20 mmol scale in anhydrous solvent under an inert atmosphere.
75% conversion after 1 h; DMF = N,N-dimethyl formamide; NMP = N-methylpyrrolidinone; NR = no reaction.
With the encouraging results in hand, we sought to evaluate the scope of the base-catalyzed transformation. A variety of N-tosylhydrazones derived from known carbonyl compounds were treated with 10 mol % K2CO3 in DMEU at 110 °C to convert into the corresponding sulfinates, and the results are presented in Scheme 4. The reaction conditions are amenable to N-tosylhydrazones obtained from aryl aldehydes containing electron-withdrawing (Br and NO2) as well as electron-releasing (via inductive and resonance effect) groups (Me, tBu, OMe, and SPh). N-Tosylhydrazones derived from benzaldehyde gave sulfinate 3a in 72% yield. N-Tosylhydrazones generated from 2-methoxybenzaldehyde and 2-(phenylthio)benzaldehyde showed excellent reactivity and furnished sulfinates 3b and 3c in 82 and 84% yields, respectively. Electron-rich 3,4,5-trimethoxybenzaldehyde-derived N-tosylhydrazone showed good reactivity and provided sulfinate 3d in 70% yield in a short reaction time (15 min). N-Tosylhydrazones derived from aromatic and aliphatic ketones showed much lower reactivity compared to those derived from aryl aldehydes toward the base-catalyzed sulfinate synthesis. N-Tosylhydrazone obtained from fluorenone underwent a slow reaction to furnish sulfinate 3e in 56% yield after 1 h. Cyclopentanone-derived N-tosylhydrazone showed no reaction at 110 °C possibly due to a higher pKa value of the N–H proton. However, sulfinate 3f could be obtained in moderate yield (52%) when heated at higher temperature (150 °C) for 2 h. It is noteworthy that, in the previous reports,18,19N-tosylhydrazones derived from aliphatic carbonyl compounds could not be converted into corresponding sulfinates. Thus, the current condition further expands the substrate scope of this important transformation. A few heteroaryl aldehyde-derived N-tosylhydrazones were also subjected to the base-catalyzed reaction conditions. N-Tosylhydrazone obtained from furfuryl-2-carboxaldehyde produced sulfinate 3g in 72% yield in a short reaction time. Pyridine-3-carboxaldehyde-derived N-tosylhydrazone also gave sulfinate 3h in good yield (68%). Next, a fairly good number of N-tosylhydrazones derived from O-alkylated (alkylated with alkyl 2-bromoacetates and benzyl chloride) 2-hydroxyarylaldehydes bearing important functional groups were investigated. Whereas no reaction was observed with N-tosylhydrazone derived from salicylaldehyde18,19 due to the presence of the acidic phenolic hydroxyl group, N-tosylhydrazones derived from O-alkylated 2-hydroxyarylaldehyedes incurred excellent reactivity and provided corresponding sulfinates (3i–q) in high yields. Further, it is worth noting that, in the presence of a stoichiometric amount of suitable base such as LiOtBu,22a KOH,22b K2CO3,22c etc., N-tosylhydrazones derived from O-allylated and O-propargylated 2-hydroxybenzaldehydes undergo the intramolecular [3 + 2]-cycloaddition reaction to generate dihydropyrazoles and pyrazoles exclusively. In contrast, under the present catalytic conditions, no recognizable intramolecular [3 + 2]-cycloaddition reaction occurred for these substrates and sulfinates 3r and 3s were obtained in 74 and 78% yields, respectively. Similarly, with a catalytic amount of K2CO3 in DMEU, no intramolecular [3 + 2]-cycloaddition23 reaction took place in the case of N-tosylhydrazone derived from 2-(2-formylphenoxy)acetonitrile and sulfinate 3t was obtained in 68% yield in a rapid conversion (Scheme 5). A point to be noted is that sulfinate 3s incorporates an internal alkyne and thus poised for exploration of novel intra- and intermolecular reactions.
Scheme 4. Synthesis of Sulfinates from N-Tosylhydrazones.

All reactions were carried out in 0.20 mmol scale using 10 mol % K2CO3 in DMEU (0.5 M) at 110 °C.
Reaction was carried out at 150 °C.
Scheme 5. Synthesis of Sulfinate 3t.
Seeking to evaluate the effect of the aryl/heteroaryl groups attached to the S-atom, a few N-sulfonylhydrazones were synthesized from aryl/heteroaryl hydrazides readily obtained following the reported experimental procedure.18,24 Salicylaldehyde, O-alkylated with tert-butyl 2-bromoacetate, was chosen as the aryl aldehyde for the excellent reactivity of the N-tosylhydrazone derived thereof (3k, Scheme 4). Choice of the tert-butyl group provided clarity in 1H NMR spectra in the 4.0–5.5 ppm region where the diastereotopic sulfinate protons appear. As depicted in Scheme 6, the K2CO3-catalyzed reaction was found to be effective on N-sulfonylhydrazones derived from various aryl/heteroarylsulfonyl hydrazides. For example, sulfinates 6a and 6b having phenyl and 2,4,6-trimethylphenyl groups on the S-atom were obtained in 80 and 76% yields, respectively. Sulfinate 6c containing a 1-naphthyl group on the S-atom was obtained in 68% yield. Similarly, sulfinate 6d, containing a 4-bromophenyl group, and sulfinate 6e, having a 3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl group on the S-atom, were obtained in 70 and 66% yields, respectively, under the optimized reaction conditions. Under this base-catalyzed reaction conditions, sulfinate 6f having a 5-bromothiophenyl group on the S-atom could also be obtained in moderate yield (60%). To demonstrate the utility in large-scale synthesis, N-tosylhydrazone derived from 2-(phenylthio)benzaldehyde was subjected to a gram-scale reaction. Gratifyingly, no significant loss in yield and/or reactivity was observed in the 1.0 gram scale reaction of N-toslhydrazone 1c, showcasing the practicality and robustness of this base-catalyzed method (Scheme 7).
Scheme 6. Sulfinates from Various N-Sulfonylhydrazones.
All reactions were carried out in 0.20 mmol scale using 10 mol % K2CO3 in DMEU at 110 °C
Scheme 7. Gram-Scale Reaction.
The conversion of N-sulfonylhydrazone to sulfinate proceeds intermolecularly, which was demonstrated by cross-over experiments in previous reports.18,19 The proposed mechanism of the K2CO3-catalyzed conversion is depicted in Scheme 8. The decomposition of N-sulfonylhydrazone 7 is triggered by the abstraction of N–H proton by K2CO3, generating deprotonated N-sulfonylhydrazone 8 and mild base KHCO3 (inert under the reaction conditions). Intermediate ion 8 releases the ambient sulfonyl ion 9, leading to diazo intermediate 11. The diazo intermediate 11 gets converted into intermediate 12 via rapid intermolecular protonation, a crucial step for the success of the catalytic conditions. Nucleophilic displacement of the diazo group in the intermediate 12 by the sulfonyl anion 10 that bears negative charge on the O-atom generates sulfinate 13. At high temperature and in a polar aprotic solvent such as DMEU, the negatively charged O-center of the ambient sulfonyl anion 10 is the favored nucleophile over the negatively charged S-center in 9. Deprotonated N-sulfonylhydrazone 8 enters into the decomposition cycle to generate a sulfinate molecule along with a new entity of the deprotonated N-sulfonylhydrazone 8. The counter cation of the anionic species 8 influences the ionic nature and thus reactivity of the ion pair in a nonsolvating highly polar aprotic solvent, thereby affecting the overall outcome of the reaction. An inspection of the reaction mechanism reveals that substitution of the diazonium ion intermediate 12 with an external ionic nucleophile that can outcompete the sulfonyl ion 9 toward nucleophilic displacement of 12 could be possible. We will examine this in our continued study toward the development of novel reactions of N-sulfonylhydrazones.
Scheme 8. Mechanism of the K2CO3-Catalyzed Sulfinate Synthesis.
Conclusions
In summary, a practical, robust, and general method for the conversion of N-sulfonylhydrazones to the corresponding sulfinates using a catalytic amount of K2CO3 in DMEU has been developed. The current reaction conditions are compatible with several functional groups. N-Tosylhydrazones derived from O-alkylated 2-hydroxyarylaldehydes show remarkable reactivity. These catalytic conditions permit the synthesis of sulfinates from N-tosylhydrazones derived from O-allylated and O-propargylated 2-hydrobenzaldehydes, which commonly undergo the intramolecular [3 + 2]-cycloaddition reaction in the presence of a stoichiometric amount of base. Sulfinates 3r–t contain important functional groups that readily react with electrophiles and thus could be exploited toward the development of new chemistry of sulfinates.
Experimental Section
General Experimental Details
Unless otherwise mentioned, all chemicals received from commercial sources were used without purification. All commercial-grade solvents were used without any purification. Anhydrous solvents used in the reactions were obtained following standard procedures. Column chromatography was performed on 60–120 mesh silica gel using gradient mixture of ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent. HRMS spectra were recorded on a SCIEX G2-SQ TOF (U.S.) mass spectrometer. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Jeol JNM-ECS spectrometer at operating frequencies of 400/500 MHz (1H) or 100/125 MHz (13C) as indicated in the individual spectrum using TMS as an internal standard. Thin layer chromatography was performed on aluminum plates (silica gel 60 PF254, 0.25 mm) purchased from Merck. Melting points were recorded in open capillary and are uncorrected. The multiplicity in 1H NMR spectra is presented as s for singlet, d for doublet, dd for doublet of doublet, t for triplet, apt for apparently triplet, q for quartet, ABq for AB-type quartet, and m for multiplet.
N-Sulfonylhydrazones were synthesized from known carbonyl compounds following the previously reported procedure.18N-Arylsulfonylhydrazides used for the synthesis N-arylsulfonylhydrazones were obtained following the reported18,24 procedure from commercially available sulfonyl chlorides and hydrazine hydrate. The 2-hydroxyarylaldehydes were O-alkylated with alkyl 2-bromoacetate, benzyl chloride, allyl bromide, propargyl bromide, and 2-bromoacetonitrile following the reported procedure.22,23,25 Unless otherwise mentioned, all sulfinates were synthesized following the experimental procedure mentioned below.
General Experimental Procedure for the Synthesis of Sulfinates
N-Tosylhydrazone 1b (60.8 mg, 0.20 mmol) and dry DMEU (0.40 mL) were charged into a 10 mL vial fitted with a magnetic stir bar and nitrogen inlet. The mixture was then heated in a preheated oil bath at 110 °C to obtain a clear solution. Anhydrous K2CO3 (2.6 mg, 0.02 mmol) was then added to the clear solution, and stirring was continued at 110 °C for 10 min.The reaction mixture was then cooled to rt, diluted with ethyl acetate (25 mL), washed with water (3 × 10 mL) and brine (1 × 10 mL), dried over Na2SO4, and evaporated. The crude product was purified by short silica gel column chromatography using a 10 → 20% gradient mixture of ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent to obtain sulfinate 3b (45.2 mg, 82% yield) as a colorless oil.
Analytical Data for the Synthesized Sulfinates
Benzyl 4-Methylbenzenesulfinate (3a)11a
35.5 mg, 72% yield; light yellow solid; purified using a 5 → 10% gradient mixture of ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.61 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.35–7.27 (m, 5H), 7.27–7.23 (m, 2H), 5.02 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, 1H), 4.55 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, 1H), 2.43 (s, 3H).
2-Methoxybenzyl 4-Methylbenzenesulfinate (3b)
45.2 mg, 82% yield; colorless oil; purified using a 5 → 10% gradient mixture of ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.63 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.33 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.33–7.21 (m, 3H), 6.92 (apt, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.85 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 5.11 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.71 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 2.42 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 157.5, 142.5, 141.9, 130.0, 129.9, 129.6, 125.4, 124.0, 120.5, 110.4, 61.9, 55.3, 21.5; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C15H17O3S [M + H]: 277.0898 found 277.0893.
2-(Phenylthio)benzyl 4-Methylbenzenesulfinate (3c)
59.7 mg, 84% yield; light yellow oil; purified using a 5 → 10% gradient mixture of ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.59 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.43 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.33–7.18 (m, 8H), 7.15 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 5.19 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.79 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 2.41 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 142.7, 141.5, 137.1, 135.8, 134.3, 133.5, 130.0, 129.9, 129.6, 129.2, 129.1, 128.1, 126.7, 125.3, 64.1, 21.5; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C20H19O2S2 [M + H]: 355.0826 found 355.0802.
3,4,5-Trimethoxybenzyl 4-Methylbenzenesulfinate (3d)18
49.2 mg, 70% yield; light brown oil; purified using a 5 → 10% gradient mixture of ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.65 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.35 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 6.47 (s, 2H), 4.94 (d, J = 11.3 Hz, 1H), 4.47 (d, J = 11.3 Hz, 1H), 3.83 (s, 9H), 2.44 (s, 3H).
9H-Fluoren-9-yl 4-Methylbenzenesulfinate (3e)26
35.9 mg, 56% yield; light yellow oil; purified using a 5 → 10% ethyl acetate in petroleum ether as eluent; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.81–7.73 (m, 3H), 7.66–7.57 (m, 2H), 7.45–7.11 (m, 7H), 6.15 (s, 1H), 2.45 (s, 3H).
Cyclopentyl 4-Methylbenzenesulfinate (3f)
23.4 mg, 52% yield; colorless oil; purified using a 1 → 5% gradient mixture of ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.58 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.32 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 4.58–4.78 (m, 1H), 2.42 (s, 3H), 1.95 (m, 2H), 1.79–1.99 (m, 4H), 1.62–1.48 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 142.7, 142.4, 129.6, 125.1, 80.7, 34.1, 33.8, 23.3, 21.5; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C12H17O2S [M + H]: 225.0949 found 225.0927.
Furan-2-ylmethyl 4-Methylbenzenesulfinate (3g)18
34.2 mg, 72% yield; brown oil; purified using a 1 → 5% gradient mixture of ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.61 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.41–7.39 (m, 1H), 7.34 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.31 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 6.30 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 4.97 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H), 4.57 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H), 2.41 (s, 3H).
Pyridin-3-ylmethyl 4-Methylbenzenesulfinate (3h)18
33.7 mg, 68% yield; white solid, mp 120–121 °C; purified using a 20 → 30% gradient mixture of ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.61–8.53 (m, 2H), 7.84 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.64 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.36 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.29 (dd, J = 5.0, 7.8 Hz, 1H), 5.01 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.54 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 2.42 (s, 3H).
Methyl 2-(2-(((p-Tolylsulfinyl)oxy)methyl)phenoxy)acetate (3i)
52.2 mg, 78% yield; colorless oil; purified using a 5 → 10% gradient mixture of ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.57 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.27–7.16 (m, 4H), 6.90 (apt, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.66 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 5.11 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H), 4.73 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H), 4.56 (s, 2H), 3.70 (s, 3H), 2.34 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 169.1, 155.8, 142.6, 141.9, 130.5, 129.8, 129.6, 125.4, 124.8, 121.7, 111.6, 65.6, 61.8, 52.2, 21.5; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C17H19O5S [M + H]: 335.0953 found 335.0965.
Ethyl 2-(2-(((p-Tolylsulfinyl)oxy)methyl)phenoxy)acetate (3j)
52.9 mg, 76% yield; colorless oil; purified using a 5 → 10% gradient mixture of ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.58 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.28–7.22 (m, 3H), 7.18 (apt, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.90 (apt, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.66 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 5.12 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H), 4.74 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H), 4.54 (s, 2H), 4.17 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.34 (s, 3H), 1.19 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 168.6, 155.9, 142.6, 141.9, 130.5, 129.7, 129.6, 125.4, 124.8, 121.7, 111.6, 65.7, 61.9, 61.3, 21.5, 14.1; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C18H21O5S [M + H]: 349.1109 found 349.1121;
tert-Butyl 2-(2-(((p-Tolylsulfinyl)oxy)methyl)phenoxy)acetate (3k)
58.7 mg, 78% yield; colorless oil; purified using a 5 → 10% gradient mixture of ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.65 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.36–7.22 (m, 4H), 6.95 (apt, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 5.19 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.81 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.51 (s, 2H), 2.41 (s, 3H), 1.45 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 167.7, 155.9, 142.5, 142.0, 130.4, 129.6, 129.5, 125.4, 124.7, 121.4, 111.4, 82.3, 66.0, 62.0, 28.0, 21.5; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C20H25O5S [M + H]: 377.1422 found 377.1409.
tert-Butyl 2-(4-Methyl-2-(((p-tolylsulfinyl)oxy)methyl)phenoxy)acetate (3l)
62.5 mg, 80% yield; colorless oil; purified using a 5 → 10% gradient mixture of ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.65 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.32 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.07 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (dd, J = 1.2, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 5.14 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.77 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.47 (s, 2H), 2.41 (s, 3H), 1.45 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 167.9, 154.0, 142.5, 142.0, 131.2, 130.8, 130.0, 129.6, 125.4, 124.3, 111.5, 82.2, 66.2, 61.9, 28.0, 21.5, 20.4; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C21H27O5S [M + H]: 391.1579 found 391.1588.
tert-Butyl 2-(4-Bromo-2-(((p-tolylsulfinyl)oxy)methyl)phenoxy)acetate (3m)
72.6 mg, 80% yield; colorless oil; purified using a 5 → 10% gradient mixture of ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.64 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.36–7.30 (m, 4H), 6.57 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 5.10 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.72 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 2.42 (s, 3H), 1.44 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 167.3, 154.8, 142.8, 141.6, 132.6, 132.0, 129.7, 127.1, 125.3, 113.7, 82.6, 66.0, 60.4, 28.0, 21.5; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C20H24BrO5S [M + H]: 451.0528 found 451.0530.
Ethyl 2-(4-Nitro-2-(((p-tolylsulfinyl)oxy)methyl)phenoxy)acetate (3n)
59.1 mg, 70% yield; light yellow oil; purified using a 5 → 10% gradient mixture of ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 8.17–8.13 (m, 2H), 7.65 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.34 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.76 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 5.16 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H), 4.74 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H), 4.72 (s, 2H), 4.25 (q, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 2.42 (s, 3H), 1.28 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 167.4, 159.9, 143.2, 141.9, 141.2, 129.8, 126.4, 125.4, 125.3, 110.9, 65.6, 61.8, 59.6, 21.5, 14.1; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C18H20NO7S [M + H]: 394.0960 found 394.0976.
Methyl 2-(2,4-Di-tert-butyl-6-(((p-tolylsulfinyl)oxy)methyl)phenoxy)acetate (3o)18
white solid; 62.5 mg, 70% yield; colorless oil; purified using a 5 → 10% gradient mixture of ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.64 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.33–7.31 (m, 3H), 7.04 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 5.05 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, 1H), 4.55 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, 1H), 4.52 (s, 2H), 3.83 (s, 3H), 2.43 (s, 3H), 1.36 (s, 9H), 1.27 (s, 9H).
Ethyl 2-((1-(((p-Tolylsulfinyl)oxy)methyl)naphthalen-2-yl)oxy)acetate (3p)
60.5 mg, 76% yield; light brown oil; purified using a 5 → 10% gradient mixture of ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.98 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.64 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.52 (apt, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.39 (apt, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.31 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.10 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 5.71 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H), 5.14 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H), 4.71 (ABq, J = 16.0 Hz, 2H), 4.25 (q, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 2.41 (s, 3H), 1.28 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 168.8, 154.6, 142.5, 141.9, 133.3, 131.4, 129.6, 128.3, 127.4, 125.4, 124.3, 123.4, 117.4, 114.1, 66.9, 61.4, 56.9, 21.5, 14.1; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C22H23O5S [M + H]: 399.1266 found 399.1273.
(2-(Benzyloxy)naphthalen-1-yl)methyl 4-Methylbenzenesulfinate (3q)
64.4 mg, 80% yield; light yellow oil; purified using a 5 → 10% gradient mixture of ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.90 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.74 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.46–7.42 (m, 1H), 7.34–7.24 (m, 6H), 7.20–7.13 (m, 3H), 5.59 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, 1H), 5.10 (s, 2H), 5.08 (d, J =10.5 Hz, 1H), 2.30 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 155.1, 144.0, 136.7, 136.5, 133.4, 131.1, 129.1, 128.5(2), 128.3, 128.0, 127.2, 127.1, 123.9(2), 113.1, 110.3, 70.7, 53.5, 21.5; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C25H23O3S [M + H]: 403.1368 found 403.1376.
2-(Allyloxy)benzyl 4-Methylbenzenesulfinate (3r)18
44.7 mg, 74% yield; light yellow oil; purified using a 5 → 10% gradient mixture of ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.62 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.31 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.28–7.22 (m, 2H), 6.95–6.88 (m, 1H), 6.85–6.80 (m, 1H), 6.07–5.93 (m, 1H), 5.37 (d, J = 17.2 Hz, 1H), 5.25 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, 1H), 5.14 (d, J = 11.3 Hz, 1H), 4.74 (d, J = 11.3 Hz, 1H), 4.55–4.49 (m, 2H), 2.41 (s, 3H).
5-Bromo-2-((3-phenylprop-2-yn-1-yl)oxy)benzyl 4-Methylbenzenesulfinate (3s)
70.8 mg, 78% yield; light brown oil; purified using a 5 → 10% gradient mixture of ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.64 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.44–7.27 (m, 9H), 6.95 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 5.07 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.88 (s, 2H), 4.68 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 2.40 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 154.8, 142.9, 141.5, 132.7, 132.1, 131.8, 129.7, 128.9, 128.3, 127.0, 125.4, 121.9, 113.9, 113.6, 87.7, 83.1, 60.5, 57.1, 21.5; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C23H20BrO3S [M + H]: 455.0316 found 455.0321.
2-(Cyanomethoxy)benzyl 4-Methylbenzenesulfinate (3t)
41.1 mg, 68% yield; light brown oil; purified using a 5 → 10% gradient mixture of ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.63 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 2H), 7.38–7.29 (m, 4H), 7.07 (apt, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.95 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 5.05 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.75 (s, 2H), 4.67 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 2.43 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 154.5, 142.9, 141.5, 131.1, 130.1, 129.7, 129.4, 128.6, 125.3, 123.1, 112.0, 60.8, 53.8, 21.5; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C16H16NO3S [M + H]: 302.0851 found 302.0842.
tert-Butyl 2-(2-(((Phenylsulfinyl)oxy)methyl)phenoxy)acetate (6a)
57.9 mg, 80% yield; colorless oil; purified using a 5 → 10% gradient mixture of ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.69 (dd, J = 2.0, 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.49–7.41 (m, 3H), 7.25–7.15 (s, 2H), 6.88 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.64 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 5.13 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.77 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.44 (s, 2H), 1.38 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 167.7, 155.9, 144.9, 131.9, 130.5, 129.7, 128.9, 125.4, 124.5, 121.4, 111.4, 82.3, 65.9, 62.3, 28.0; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C19H23O5S [M + H]: 363.1266 found 363.1276.
tert-Butyl 2-(2-(((Mesitylsulfinyl)oxy)methyl)phenoxy)acetate (6b)
61.5 mg, 76% yield; colorless oil; purified using a 5 → 10% gradient mixture of ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.34 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.28–7.20 (m, 1H), 6.95 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (s, 2H), 6.71 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 5.26 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 5.17 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.50 (s, 2H), 2.55 (s, 6H), 2.25 (s, 3H), 1.44 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 167.7, 155.7, 141.7, 138.4, 137.7, 130.5, 129.9, 129.5, 125.2, 121.4, 111.4, 82.3, 66.0, 65.4, 28.0, 21.1, 19.0; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C22H29O5S [M + H]: 405.1735 found 405.1755.
tert-Butyl 2-(2-(((Naphthalen-1-ylsulfinyl)oxy)methyl)phenoxy)acetate (6c)
56.1 mg, 68% yield; light yellow oil; purified using a 5 → 10% gradient mixture of ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 8.21 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 8.15 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 7.94 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.84 (dd, J = 2.0, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (apt, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.50–7.43 (m, 2H), 7.15–7.08 (m, 2H), 6.83–6.77 (m, 1H), 6.56 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 5.18 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.67 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.27 (ABq, J = 16.0 Hz, 2H), 1.34 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 167.7, 155.9, 139.4, 133.7, 132.8, 130.6, 129.7, 129.4, 128.6, 127.2, 126.6, 124.8, 124.4, 122.7, 121.3, 11.3, 82.3, 65.8, 62.0, 27.9; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C23H25O5S [M + H]: 413.1422 found 413.1409.
tert-Butyl 2-(2-((((4-Bromophenyl)sulfinyl)oxy)methyl)phenoxy)acetate (6d)
61.6 mg, 70% yield; colorless oil; purified using a 5 → 10% gradient mixture of ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.68 (m, 4H), 7.29 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 6.96 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.72 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 5.19 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.85 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.51 (s, 2H), 1.46 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 167.6, 156.0, 144.0, 132.2, 130.7, 130.0, 127.2, 126.8, 124.2, 121.5, 111.4, 82.4, 65.9, 62.7, 28.0; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C19H22BrO5S [M + H]: 441.0371 found 441.0389.
tert-Butyl 2-(2-((((3-(Trifluoromethyl)phenyl)sulfinyl)oxy)methyl)phenoxy)acetate (6e)
56.8 mg, 66% yield; light brown oil; purified using a 5 → 10% gradient mixture of ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.95 (s, 1H), 7.90 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.71 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.58 (apt, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.25–7.16 (m, 2H), 6.89 (apt, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.66 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 5.17 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 4.48 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.45 (s, 2H), 1.38 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 167.5, 156.1, 146.4, 131.6, 131.6 (q, J = 132 Hz), 130.9, 130.2, 129.6, 129.0, 128.6 (2), 124.0, 122.8, 122.7 (q, J = 17.0 Hz), 121.5, 111.5, 82.4, 65.8, 63.5, 28.0; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C20H22F3O5S [M + H]: 431.1140 found 431.1128.
tert-Butyl 2-(2-((((5-Bromothiophen-2-yl)sulfinyl)oxy)methyl)phenoxy)acetate (6f)
53.6 mg, 60% yield; brown oil; purified using a 5 → 10% gradient mixture of ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.28–7.18 (m, 3H), 7.03 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 6.91 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.67 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 5.20 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.94 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.47 (s, 2H), 1.39 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 167.6, 156.0, 148.9, 130.7, 130.6, 130.2, 130.0, 124.1, 121.5, 119.4, 111.5, 82.4, 65.9, 62.4, 28.0; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C17H20BrO5S2 [M + H]: 446.9935 found 446.9942.
Experimental Procedure for Gram-Scale Reaction
N-Tosylhydrazone 1c (1.0 g, 2.61 mmol) and dry DMEU (5.3 mL) were charged into a 10 mL vial fitted with a magnetic stir bar and nitrogen inlet. The mixture was then placed in a preheated oil bath at 110 °C to obtain a clear solution. Anhydrous K2CO3 (36 mg, 0.26 mmol) was then added to the clear solution, and stirring was continued at 110 °C for 15 min. The reaction mixture was then cooled to rt, diluted with ethyl acetate (50 mL), washed with water (3 × 20 mL) and brine (1 × 15 mL), dried over Na2SO4, and evaporated. The crude product was purified by short silica gel column chromatography using a 10 → 20% gradient mixture of ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent to obtain sulfinate 3c (820 mg, 82% yield) as a light yellow oil.
Acknowledgments
Research grant from the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi (Grant No. 02(0346)/19/EMR-II), is gratefully acknowledged. H.S.K. thanks UGC, New Delhi, for a research fellowship.
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.0c02616.
1H and 13C NMR spectra of all new compounds; crude 1H NMR of a reaction of 1k carried out in DMSO-d6; 1H NMR of compound 1k in DMSO-d6 (Figure S1); 1H NMR of the crude reaction mixture 1k in DMSO-d6 (Figure S2) (PDF)
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Supplementary Material
References
- For reviews on the synthesis and applications of sulfinates, see; a Fernández I.; Khiar N. Recent developments in the synthesis and utilization of chiral sulfoxides. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 3651–3706. 10.1021/cr990372u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Robak M. T.; Herbage M. A.; Ellman J. A. Synthesis and Applications of tert-butanesulfinamide. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 3600–3740. 10.1021/cr900382t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li H. J.; Wang R.; Gao J.; Wang Y. Y.; Luo D. H.; Wu Y. C. Bismuth(III) bromide-catalysed substitution of benzyl alcohols with arylsulfonylmethyl isocyanides: an unexpected access to sulfinates. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2015, 357, 1393–1397. 10.1002/adsc.201401173. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hemmi M.; Ikeda Y.; Shindo Y.; Nakajima T.; Nishiyama S.; Oka K.; Sato M.; Hiruta Y.; Citterio D.; Suzuki K. Highly sensitive bioluminescent probe for thiol detection in living cells. Chem. - Asian J. 2018, 13, 648–655. 10.1002/asia.201701774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Tapia-Pineda A.; Perez-Arrieta C.; Silva-Cuevas C.; Paleo E.; Lujan-Montelongo J. A. The two faces of sulfinates: illustrating umpolung reactivity. J. Chem. Educ. 2016, 93, 1470–1474. 10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Yuste F.; Linares A. H.; Mastranzo V. M.; Ortiz B.; Sanchez-Obregon Ruben.; Fraile A.; Ruano L. G. Methyl sulfinates as electrophiles in Friedel–Crafts reactions. Synthesis of aryl sulfoxides. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 4635–4644. 10.1021/jo2006335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Aziz J.; Messaoudi S.; Alami M.; Hamze A. Sulfinate derivatives: dual and versatile partners in organic synthesis. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014, 12, 9743–9759. 10.1039/C4OB01727G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Lujan-Montelongo J. A.; Estevez A. O.; Fleming F. F. Alkyl sulfinates: formal nucleophiles for synthesizing TosMIC analogs. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 1602–1605. 10.1002/ejoc.201403615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- For leading references, see; a Zhang Y.; Chitale S.; Goyal N.; Li G.; Han Z. S.; Shen S.; Ma S.; Grinberg N.; Lee H.; Lu B. Z.; Senanayake C. H. Asymmetric synthesis of sulfinamides using (−)-quinine as chiral auxiliary. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 690–695. 10.1021/jo201825b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Fernández I.; Khiar N. Recent developments in the synthesis and utilization of chiral sulfoxides. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 3651–3706. 10.1021/cr990372u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Zhou H.; Duan J.; Xie D.; Yang J.; Ma B.; Wang G.; Wu C.; Wang X.-C. Electrochemical synthesis of sulfinic esters via aerobic oxidative esterification of thiophenols with alcohols. Synthesis 2020, 1707966 10.1055/s-0040-1707966. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b He Y.; Zhang J.; Xu L.; Wei Y. Electrochemical synthesis of sulfinic esters from alcohols and thiophenols. Tetrahedron Lett. 2020, 61, 151631 10.1016/j.tetlet.2020.151631. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Ai C.; Shen H.; Song D.; Li Y.; Yi X.; Wang Z.; Ling F.; Zhong W. Metal- and oxidant-free electrochemical synthesis of sulfinic esters from thiols and alcohols. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 5528–5531. 10.1039/C9GC02125F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- a Zhou C.; Tan Z.; Jiang H.; Zhang M. A sustainable oxidative esterification of thiols with alcohols by a cobalt nanocatalyst supported on doped carbon. Green Chem. 2018, 20, 1992–1997. 10.1039/C8GC00441B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Shyam P. K.; Kim Y. K.; Lee C.; Jang H.-Y. Copper-catalyzed aerobic formation of unstable sulfinyl radicals for the synthesis of sulfinates and thiosulfonates. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2016, 358, 56–61. 10.1002/adsc.201500785. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wen C.; Wu J.; Ou Y.; Huang Y.; Zhang K.; Chen Q. TBHP/TBAI-mediated oxidation of thiophenols for the synthesis of tert-butyl arylsulfinates. Tetrahedron Lett. 2018, 59, 3609–3611. 10.1016/j.tetlet.2018.08.048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Du B. N.; Li Z.; Qian P.; Han J. L.; Pan Y. Copper-catalyzed aerobic oxidative reaction of sulfonyl hydrazides with alcohols: an easy access to sulfinates. Chem. - Asian J. 2016, 11, 478–481. 10.1002/asia.201501262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wei J.; Sun Z. tert-Butyl sulfoxide as a starting point for the synthesis of sulfinyl containing compounds. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 5396–5399. 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b02743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Huang M.; Hu L.; Shen H.; Liu Q.; Hussain M. I.; Pan J.; Xiong Y. Sulfination of alcohols with sodium sulfinates promoted by BF3.OEt2: an unexpected access. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 1874–1879. 10.1039/C5GC02846A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Ji Y.-Z.; Li H.-J.; Zhang J.-Y.; Wu Y.-C. Sodium arenesulfinates-involved sulfinate synthesis revisited: improved synthesis and revised reaction mechanism. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 1846–1855. 10.1002/ejoc.201900097. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Tranquilino A.; Andrade S. R. C. P.; da Silva A. P. M.; Menezes P. H.; Oliveira R. A. Non-expensive, open-flask and selective catalytic systems for the synthesis of sulfinate esters and thiosulfonates. Tetrahedron Lett. 2017, 58, 1265–1268. 10.1016/j.tetlet.2017.02.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kadari L.; Radha Krishna P.; Prapurna Y. L. Sulfination of alcohols with p-toluenesulfonylmethyl isocyanide under metal-free conditions: a Mitsunobu approach. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2016, 358, 3863–3868. 10.1002/adsc.201600997. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- For recent reviews, see; a Barluenga J.; Valdés C. Tosylhydrazones: new uses for classic reagents in palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling and metal-free reactions. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 7486–7500. 10.1002/anie.201007961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Shao Z.; Zhang H. N-Tosylhydrazones: versatile reagents for metal-catalyzed and metal-free cross-coupling reactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 560–572. 10.1039/C1CS15127D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Xiao Q.; Zhang Y.; Wang J. B. Diazo compounds and N-tosylhydrazones: novel cross-coupling partners in transition-metal-catalyzed reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 236–247. 10.1021/ar300101k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Xia Y.; Zhang Y.; Wang J. Catalytic cascade reactions involving metal carbene migratory insertion. ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 2586–2598. 10.1021/cs4006666. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; e Jadhav A. P.; Ray D.; Rao V. U. B.; Singh R. P. Copper-catalyzed direct cross-coupling of compounds containing activated C–H/heteroatom–H bonds with N-tosylhydrazones. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 2369–2382. 10.1002/ejoc.201600074. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; f Hu F.; Xia Y.; Ma C.; Zhang Y.; Wang J. C–H bond functionalization based on metal carbene migratory insertion. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 7986–7995. 10.1039/C5CC00497G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g Xia Y.; Qiu D.; Wang J. Transition-metal-catalyzed cross-couplings through carbene migratory insertion. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 13810–13889. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h Xia Y.; Wang J. N-Tosylhydrazones: versatile synthons in the construction of cyclic compounds. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 2306–2362. 10.1039/C6CS00737F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Wang H.; Deng Y.-H.; Shao Z. An update of N-tosylhydrazones: versatile reagents for metal-catalyzed and metal-free coupling reactions. Synthesis 2018, 50, 2281–2306. 10.1055/s-0036-1591993. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Arunprasath D.; Devi Bala B.; Sekar G. Luxury of N-tosylhydrazones in transition-metal-free transformations. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2019, 361, 1172–1207. 10.1002/adsc.201801031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Plaza M.; Paraja M.; Florentino L.; Valdés C. Domino synthesis of benzo-fused β,γ-unsaturated ketones from alkenylboronic acids and N-tosylhydrazone-tethered benzonitriles. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 632–635. 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b03705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Plaza M.; Parisotto S.; Valdés C. Heterocyclization and spirocyclization processes based on domino reactions of N-tosylhydrazones and boronic acids involving intramolecular allylborylations of nitriles. Chem. - Eur. J. 2018, 24, 14836–14843. 10.1002/chem.201803309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Plaza M.; Valdés C. Stereoselective domino carbocyclizations of γ- and δ-cyano-N-tosylhydrazones with Alkenylboronic acids with formation of two different C(sp3)–C(sp2) bonds on a quaternary stereocenter. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 12061–12064. 10.1021/jacs.6b08116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Barluenga J.; Tomás-Gamasa M.; Aznar F.; Valdés C. Metal-free carbon-carbon bond-forming reductive coupling between boronic acids and tosylhydrazones. Nat. Chem. 2009, 1, 494–499. 10.1038/nchem.328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bamford W. R.; Stevens T. S. The decomposition of toluene-p-sulphonylhydrazones by alkali. J. Chem. Soc. 1952, 4735–4740. 10.1039/jr9520004735. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- a Sha Q.; Wei Y. Base and solvent mediated decomposition of tosylhydrazones: highly selective synthesis of N-alkyl substituted hydrazones, dialkylidenehydrazines, and oximes. Tetrahedron 2013, 69, 3829–3835. 10.1016/j.tet.2013.03.055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Liu J. B.; Yan H.; Lu G. N-Alkylation of tosylhydrazones via a metal-free reductive coupling procedure. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013, 54, 891–895. 10.1016/j.tetlet.2012.11.124. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- a Zhao J. L.; Guo S.-H.; Qiu J.; Gou X.-F.; Hua C.-W.; Chen B. Iron(III) phthalocyanine-chloride-catalyzed synthesis of sulfones from sulfonylhydrazones. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016, 57, 2375–2378. 10.1016/j.tetlet.2016.04.044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Barluenga J.; Tomás-Gamasa M.; Aznar F.; Valdés C. Synthesis of sulfones by iron-catalyzed decomposition of sulfonylhydrazones. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 1520–1526. 10.1002/ejoc.201001492. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Feng X. W.; Wang J.; Zhang J.; Yang J.; Wang N.; Yu X. Q. Copper-catalyzed nitrogen loss of sulfonylhydrazones: a reductive strategy for the synthesis of sulfones from carbonyl compounds. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 4408–4411. 10.1021/ol101955x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Zhang J. L.; Chan P. W. H.; Che C. M. Ruthenium(II) porphyrin catalyzed cyclopropanation of alkenes with tosylhydrazones. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 8733–8737. 10.1016/j.tetlet.2003.09.157. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Choudhary D.; Khatri V.; Basak A. K. Wittig ylide mediated decomposition of N-sulfonylhydrazones to sulfinates. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 1703–1706. 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b03953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ji Y.-Z.; Wua Q.-X.; Li H.-J.; Luoa D.-H.; Wu Y.-C. Base-promoted direct synthesis of sulfinates from N-sulfonylhydrazones under metal-free conditions. Synthesis 2020, 52, 755–762. 10.1055/s-0039-1690754. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- DBU catalyzed decomposition of ethylglyoxylate derived N-tosylhydrazone and in situ sulfa-Michael reaction was previously reported: see; Fernández M.; Uria U.; Orbe L.; Vicario J. L.; Reyes E.; Carrillo L. Ethyl glyoxylate N-tosylhydrazone as sulfonyl-transfer reagent in base-catalyzed sulfa-Michael reactions. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 441–445. 10.1021/jo402518q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Cleary S. E.; Li X.; Yang L.-C.; Houk K. N.; Hong X.; Brewer M. Reactivity profiles of diazo amides, esters, and ketones in transition-metal-free C–H insertion reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 3558–3556. 10.1021/jacs.8b12420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Choudhary D.; Agrawal C.; Khatri V.; Thakuria R.; Basak A. K. Transition metal and base free coupling of N-tosylhydrazones with 1, 3-dicarbonyl compound. Tetrahedron Lett. 2017, 58, 1132–1136. 10.1016/j.tetlet.2017.02.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- For [3+2]-cycloaddition, see; a Zheng Y.; Zhang X.; Yao R.; Wen Y. C.; Huang J.; Xu X. 1,3-Dipolar cycloaddition of alkyne-tethered N-tosylhydrazones: synthesis of fused polycyclic pyrazoles. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 11072–11080. 10.1021/acs.joc.6b02076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Divya K. V. L.; Meena A.; Suja T. D. Unified approach to pyrazole-fused heterocyclic and carbocyclic motifs through one-pot condensation and intramolecular dipolar cycloaddition reaction. Synthesis 2016, 48, 4207–4212. 10.1055/s-0035-1562533. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Muthusamy S.; Gangadurai C. “On water” cascade synthesis of benzopyranopyrazoles and their macrocycles. Tetrahedron Lett. 2018, 59, 1501–1505. 10.1016/j.tetlet.2018.03.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mani N. S.; Fitzgerald A. E. A step-economical route to fused 1,2,3-triazoles via an intramolecular 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition between a nitrile and an in situ generated aryldiazomethane. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 8889–8894. 10.1021/jo5013288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang F.-L.; Ma X.-T.; Tian S.-K. Oxidative Mizoroki–Heck-type reaction of arylsulfonyl hydrazides for a highly regio- and stereoselective synthesis of polysubstituted alkenes. Chem. - Eur. J. 2012, 18, 1582–1585. 10.1002/chem.201103671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Hussein W. M.; Feder D.; Schenk G.; Guddat L. W.; McGeary R. P. Purple acid phosphatase inhibitors as leads for osteoporosis chemotherapeutics. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 157, 462–479. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Simonetti S. O.; Larghi E. L.; Kaufman T. S. A convenient approach to an advanced intermediate toward the naturally occurring, bioactive 6-substituted 5-hydroxy-4-aryl-1H-quinolin-2-ones. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016, 14, 2625–2636. 10.1039/C5OB02680F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Khalil N. S. A. M. Efficient synthesis of novel 1,2,4-triazole fused acyclic and 21–28 membered macrocyclic and/or lariat macrocyclic oxaazathia crown compounds with potential antimicrobial activity. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 5265–5277. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2010.08.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shibata N.; Matsunaga M.; Nakagawa M.; Fukuzumi T.; Nakamura S.; Toru T. Cinchona alkaloid/sulfinyl chloride combinations: Enantioselective sulfinylating agents of alcohols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1374–1375. 10.1021/ja0430189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.









