Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2020 Jul 23;15(7):e0236394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236394

Exposure to polychlorinated compounds and cryptorchidism; A nested case-control study

Jonatan Axelsson 1,2,3,*, Kristin Scott 2, Joakim Dillner 4, Christian H Lindh 2, He Zhang 3, Lars Rylander 2, Anna Rignell-Hydbom 2
Editor: Angela Lupattelli5
PMCID: PMC7377911  PMID: 32702712

Abstract

Background

Maldescended testes or cryptorchidism is a genital birth defect that affects 2–9% of all male new-borns. Over the last 40 years there have been reports of increased prevalence in countries like the US, the UK and the Scandinavian countries. This possible increase has in some studies been linked to a foetal exposure to chemical pollutants. In this matched case-control study, we analysed maternal serum samples in early pregnancy for three different organochlorine compounds, to investigate whether the levels were associated with the risk of cryptorchidism.

Method

Maternal serum samples taken during the first trimester of pregnancy from 165 cases (boys born with cryptorchidism) and 165 controls, matched for birth year and maternal age, parity and smoking habits during the pregnancy, were retrieved from the Southern Sweden Maternity Biobank. The samples were analysed for 2,2’,4,4’,5,5’-hexachlorobiphenyl (PCB-153), dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (p,p’-DDE) and hexachlorobenzene (HCB), using gas chromatography mass spectrometry. Associations between exposure and cryptorchidism were evaluated by conditional logistic regression.

Results

We found no statistically significantly associations between exposure to these compounds and cryptorchidism, either when the exposure variables were used as a continuous variable, or when the exposure levels were divided in quartiles.

Conclusion

We found no evidence of an association between maternal levels of PCB-153, p,p’-DDE or HCB during the pregnancy and the risk of having cryptorchidism in the sons.

Introduction

Maldescended testis, or cryptorchidism, is a genital birth defect that affects up to 8% of newborn boys [1], which is associated with a risk of testicular cancer and impaired fertility later in life [2]. An increased prevalence over the last 40 years has been reported in some countries, such as in the US [3], the UK [4] and the Scandinavian countries [5]. The knowledge about risk factors for cryptorchidism is still scarce [6], but due to a possible increase in incidence, exposure to environmental chemicals, especially so called endocrine disruptors, has been suggested as a potential risk factor [7]. Environmental chemicals include several lipophilic organochlorine compounds, often called persistent organochlorine pollutants (POP), such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB), dioxins and pesticides like dichlorodiphenyl trichloroethane (DDT) and hexachlorobenzene (HCB) [8]. These chemicals are resistant to degradation and accumulate in food chains [9]. Despite the fact that the majority of POPs have been restricted or banned in most countries during the 1970´s and 1980´s, many are still found in humans due to their persistence [10]. POPs are known to cross the placenta and serve as a prenatal source of exposure for the developing foetus [11, 12]. Although recent reviews have found little evidence for associations between potential endocrine-disrupting chemicals, including the mentioned POPs, and cryptorchidism [6, 13, 14] associations have been suggested to be stronger in certain contexts [6], such as an association between DDE and cryptorchidism, hypospadias and testicular cancer, taken together as a single outcome representing male reproductive disorder [14].

In this study we used first trimester maternal serum samples from a large population-based maternity biobank in Southern Sweden, to establish POP exposure in utero, similar to a previous study [15]. The samples were analysed for 2,2’,4,4’,5,5’-hexachlorobiphenyl (PCB-153) as a biomarker for PCB exposure, since PCB-153 has been found to correlate very well with total PCB concentration in plasma and serum from Swedish individuals [1618]. The samples were also analysed for 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis (p-chlorophenyl)-ethylene (p,p’-DDE), which is a persistent metabolite of DDT, and for HCB. Maternal serum levels of all three chemicals have been found to correlate well with foetal levels [19].

Material and methods

The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved the local Ethical Review Board at Lund University with the approval number 177/2005. The ethical approval included that a specific consent for the study was not needed.

Study population

The Southern Sweden Microbiology Biobank (SSMB) is a population-based health care biobank containing serum samples submitted primarily for virus diagnostics. All samples have been stored during 1986 and from 1988 onwards, resulting in about 1.3 million serum samples from 524.000 donors at the time when the linkage for the current study was done in 2002. A separate cohort in the SSMB is the Maternity Biobank, containing serum samples taken during the first trimester of pregnancy from women undergoing routine screening for HIV, hepatitis B, syphilis and rubella immunity at the maternity care, a screening in which virtually all pregnant women participate.

Cases (boys born with cryptorchidism), were identified by linkage between the SSMB, the Medical Birth Registry (MBR), the Malformation Registry and the In-patient Registry, and resulted in 640 boys with cryptorchidism. For 186 (29%) of these identified cases, we could localize a sample in the biobank that contained sufficient amount of serum to be included in the study. Any additional information about the pregnancy was retrieved from the MBR. For 165 of these boys, we were able to find at least one control boy within the biobank—matched on birth year and maternal age, parity and smoking habits early in the pregnancy. For four of the cases, two control boys could be found, ending up with 169 control boys. For those four cases with more than one control, we randomly included one of the two controls, ending up with 165 control boys. Boys with hypospadias or any major malformation were excluded.

Determination of PCB-153, p,p´-DDE and HCB

PCB-153, p,p’-DDE and HCB were extracted from 0.005 ml aliquots of serum by solid phase extraction (Strata SDB-L 200 mg; Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) using on-column degradation of the lipids and analysis by gas chromatography mass spectrometry by the use of negative-ion chemical ionization. Selected ion monitoring were performed at m/z 360, 318, 284 for PCB-153, p,p’-DDE and HCB, respectively, and 13C12-labeled PCB-153, 13C12-labeled p,p’-DDE and 13C12-labeled HCB were used as internal standards at m/z 372, 330 and 290, respectively. The relative standard deviations, calculated from 100 samples analysed in duplicate at different days, was 5% at 2 ng/ml for PCB-153, 8% at 7 ng/ml for p,p’-DDE and 6% at 0.3 ng/ml for HCB. The limit of detections were set at 0.05 ng/ml, 0.1 ng/ml and 0.02 ng/ml for PCB-153, p,p’-DDE and HCB respectively. The analyses of PCB-153, p,p’-DDE and HCB were part of the Round Robin inter-comparison program (Professor Dr med. Hans Drexler, Institute and out-patient Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany) with analysis results within the tolerance limits. Levels of PCB-153 and DDE were missing in four controls and two cases.

Statistical analyses

The association between the levels of maternal POP concentrations as continuous variables and the risk for cryptorchidism in the offspring was evaluated by conditional logistic regression in SPSS: https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/11-matched-case-control-studies-conditional-logistic-regression. We were given the odds ratios (OR) of being a case for one unit increase in level of exposure [20] as the risk measure with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). After analyses with POP concentrations as continuous variables, the concentrations (PCB-153, p,p´-DDE and HCB) were categorized into four equally sized groups (quartiles) based on the distributions among the controls, after which the same statistical analyses as above were performed, assessing the odds ratio of being a case for one unit increase in exposure quartile. Due to the relatively high correlation between the concentrations of PCB-153, p,-DDE and HCB concentrations (r varied between 0.37 and 0.52), we did not include these exposure measures simultaneously in the models in our original analyses.

Finally, as a first sensitivity analysis, we repeated the analyses above after only including boys that were born full term (at least 37 weeks of pregnancy length), which was the case in 320 boys. As a second sensitivity analysis we instead included all POP levels as continuous variables in the model at the same time, in all the boys.

Results

Variables matched for in the cases and controls can be found in Table 1.

Table 1. Statistics of variables matched for in the studies boys and their mothers.

Median birth year Mean maternal age (years) Mean maternal parity Proportion of mothers smoking
Cases 1995 29 1.6 9.6%
Controls 1995 28 1.6 10%

The median maternal serum concentrations of PCB-153 was 0.45 ng/ml for the cases (range 0.03–1.7 ng/ml) and 0.47 ng/mL for the controls (0.03–4.0 ng/mL), of p,p’-DDE 1.1 ng/ml for cases (0.05–34 ng/ml) and 1.1 ng/mL for controls (0.05–20 ng/mL), and of HCB 0.19 ng/ml for cases (0.01–3.1 ng/ml) and 0.19 for controls (0.01–10 ng/ml). Levels of compounds in cases and controls, and numbers of men in the different exposure quartiles, are shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Maternal serum concentrations of (and quartiles of exposure to) PCB-153 (n = 324), p,p’-DDE (n = 324) and HCB (n = 330) during pregnancy in cases of cryptorchidism and matched controls, as shown in all boys (n = 330) and those only born full term (n = 320).

Compound Quartile levels All boys Full term only
Cases Controls Cases Controls
PCB-153 (median values) 0.45 ng/mL 0.47 ng/mL 0.45 ng/mL 0.48 ng/mL
Number of boys Number of boys Number of boys Number of boys
PCB-153 quartile 1 <0.23 ng/ml 40 40 40 39
PCB-153 quartile 2 0.24–0.46 ng/ml 43 39 43 33
PCB-153 quartile 3 0.46–0.69 ng/ml 36 42 36 42
PCB-153 quartile 4 0.70> ng/ml 44 40 44 37
p,p’-DDE (median values) 1.1 ng/mL 1.1 ng/mL 1.07 ng/mL 1.05 ng/mL
Number of boys Number of boys Number of boys Number of boys
p,p’-DDE quartile 1 ≤0.05 ng/ml 35 44 35 41
p,p’-DDE quartile 2 0.12–1.0 ng/ml 45 35 45 33
p,p’-DDE quartile 3 1.0–2.05 ng/ml 42 42 42 40
p,p’-DDE quartile 4 2.05> ng/ml 41 40 41 37
HCB (median values) 0.19 ng/mL 0.19 ng/mL 0.190 ng/mL 0.185 ng/mL
Number of boys Number of boys Number of boys Number of boys
HCB quartile 1 ≤0.15 ng/ml 48 43 48 41
HCB quartile 2 0.15–0.18 ng/ml 29 37 29 35
HCB quartile 3 0.18–0.26 ng/ml 49 48 49 44
HCB quartile 4 0.26> ng/ml 39 37 39 35

When using the exposure variables as continuous variables, one ng/mL increase in PCB-153 levels corresponded to a 42% lower odds [OR of 0.58 (95%CI: 0.28–1.2)] of being a case (Table 3).

Table 3. Odds ratios of a son with cryptorchidism depending on one unit increase in maternal levels (continuous or in quartiles) of POPs, unadjusted for levels of the other two POPs.

Compound Exposure model OR 95%CI
PCB-153 Continuous (ng/mL) 0.58 0.28–1.2
In quartiles 0.98 0.76–1.3
p,p’-DDE Continuous (ng/mL) 1.1 0.98–1.1
In quartiles 1.1 0.86–1.3
HCB Continuous (ng/mL) 0.92 0.63–1.3
In quartiles 1.0 0.81–1.2

Correspondingly, one ng/mL increase in p,p’-DDE gave a 10% higher odds [OR of 1.1 (95%CI: 0.98–1.1)] of being a case, whereas one ng/mL increase in HCB gave an 8% lower odds [OR of 0.92 (95%CI: 0.63–1.3)] of being a case (Table 3).

When having the POP levels divided in quartiles, one unit increase in quartiles of PCB-153 corresponded to a 2% lower odds of being a case [OR 0.98 (95%CI: 0.76–1.3)]. For p,p’-DDE, one unit increase in quartiles corresponded to a 10% higher odds of being a case [OR 1.1 (95%CI: 0.86–1.3)], and for HCB one unit increase in quartiles corresponded to 0% higher odds [OR 1.0 (95%CI: 0.81–1.2)] (Table 3).

In the sensitivity analysis, only including boys born full term, all effect estimates remained similar (with the largest change being for PCB-153 as a continuous variable to an OR of 0.56, with the 95%CI still including 1.0). In our second sensitivity analysis, including all POPs as continuous variables simultaneously, one unit increase in the level of PCB-153 decreased the odds of being a case by 0.32% [OR 0.68 (95%CI: 0.32–1.5)], whereas one unit increase in the level of DDE increased the odds by 6.7% [OR 1.067 (95%CI: 0.99–1.2)] and one unit increase in HCB decreased the risk by 18% [OR 0.82 (95%CI: 0.46–1.5)].

Discussion

We did not find any evidence of associations between maternal serum levels in early pregnancy of PCB-153, p,p’-DDE or HCB and the risk of cryptorchidism in the sons. This was robust to sensitivity analyses when only including boys born full term, and when adjusting for the levels of the corresponding two compounds.

A general strength of this study is that the samples analysed in this study were taken during the first trimester of pregnancy which largely includes the period when anti-androgenic exposures are suggested to disrupt the masculinisation of the human reproductive tract and the appropriate later development such as the testicular descent [21]. Levels of POPs in first trimester have also been reported to be correlated with levels in cord blood [12], which seems to strengthen the use of the available samples in this study as a suitable matrix.

There is a risk that some of the control boys might in fact have had cryptorchidism at an early age, since boys with a spontaneous ascent before the age of 6 months may not always be referred to a surgeon or urologist for a diagnosis ending up in the in-patient register [22]. This is illustrated by the lower reliability of registers than cohort study data on cryptorchidism [23]. This may, therefore, have led to an underestimation of the odds ratios for cryptorchidism of the different POPs in our study, especially since more subtle genital abnormalities (such as possibly spontaneously resolving cryptorchidism) more often may have environmental factors as components in the causation, as compared to more severe abnormalities [24]. There is also a risk that the measurement of the POPs to some extent has been misclassified [25], which we however may have partly mitigated by using levels not adjusted for serum lipids [26]. A potential risk of having misclassified the matching factors cannot be excluded but may be of a minor importance due to a fairly high quality of this type of data in the Swedish Medical Birth Register [27]. The possible effects on our results from residual confounding is hard to evaluate, since few firmly established environmental causes of cryptorchidism are known, except possibly maternal smoking [6] which we however matched for.

A strength of our study compared with other studies is that our study is about two times larger than another study reporting an association between a combination of the eight most abundant persistent pesticides, including DDE and HCB, in breast milk and cryptorchidism in sons [28]. We, further, measured the levels of exposure during the pregnancy which may be more relevant than measuring the exposure afterwards. Moreover, associations between a combination of compounds and cryptorchidism, such as in the study by Damgaard and coworkers [28], could be related to the metabolism of many different other exogenous and endogenous compounds, why studying one compound at a time as in our study may be advantageous. Our study is also about three times larger than a study reporting that the 2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalent quantity of several polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and furans, and dioxin-like PCBs, were associated with cryptorchidism, similar to their sum of PCBs which was close to statistically significant [29].

Our study did not include measurements of dioxins, furans, polybrominated diphenyl ethers, nor a sum of PCBs. Still, since PCB-153 has been reported to correlate well with total PCB levels [16, 17], we believe that our results would have been the same if we had measured total PCB exposure. Still, different PCB congeners have been reported to have different potential to affect sex hormone function such as PCB-138 but not PCB-153 being an antagonist to the androgen receptor function [30]–an effect that may be of specific relevance to cryptorchidism. Still these two compounds have been reported to be highly correlated [31] why PCB-153 levels also seems likely to indicate the levels of the anti-androgenic PCB-138. Nonetheless, since PCB-153 also has been reported to correlate with total dioxin toxic equivalents in human samples [32], this seems to indicate that also environmental exposure to overall dioxin-like toxicity in the maternal samples of our study was not associated with the risk of cryptorchidism in the boys. Another study on levels in breast milk reported that levels of PCB compounds seemed to protect against cryptorchidism, whereas levels of the specific compound octachlorodibenzofuran and polybrominated difenyl ethers were associated with a higher risk of cryptorchidism in a Danish cohort, albeit not in a Finnish cohort [33]. Without measurement of octachlorodibenzofuran and polybrominated difenyl ethers in our study, we cannot exclude that exposure to any of them could have been elevated in the mothers of our cases, and been a mechanism behind their cryptorchidism.

Nevertheless, although the levels of the measured compounds were lower in our study than in some other studies on exposure, such as for DDE [3437], the lack of an association between exposure markers for levels of PCB, DDE and HCB and cryptorchidism in our study, seems to corroborate review articles indicating a general lack of a strong support for an association between exposure to potential endocrine-disrupting compounds and cryptorchidism as a specific outcome [6, 14], although DDE was reported associated with male reproductive disorders when taken together [14]. This may be of relevance to our study in which only DDE had a positive OR for the risk of cryptorchidism, remaining in the sensitivity analyses when all compounds were included simultaneously, albeit with a confidence interval including 1.0 in both cases.

Taken together, our study seems to corroborate previous studies indicating that prenatal exposure to PCB, DDT and HCB is not an important risk factor for the development of cryptorchidism.

Data Availability

Due to the personal data collected and potentially identifying information contained within the data, data are available upon request. Ethical approval by The Swedish Ethical Review Authority may be necessary, and requests for data may be sent to LUPOP - Lund University Population Research Platform to the email address: lupop@ed.lu.se.

Funding Statement

ARH: 2008-32038-63634-60, The Swedish Research Council, https://www.vr.se/english.html The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Virtanen HE, Bjerknes R, Cortes D, Jorgensen N, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Thorsson AV, et al. Cryptorchidism: classification, prevalence and long-term consequences. Acta Paediatr. 2007;96(5):611–6. Epub 2007/04/28. APA241 [pii] 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00241.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nieschlag E, Behre HM, Wieacker P, Meschede D, Kamischke A, Kliesch S. Disorders at the testicular level In: Nieschlag E, Behre HM, Nieschlag S, editors. Andrology: male reproductive health and dysfunction. Berlin;: Springer; 2010. p. 193–238. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Paulozzi LJ. International trends in rates of hypospadias and cryptorchidism. Environ Health Perspect. 1999;107(4):297–302. Epub 1999/03/25. 10.1289/ehp.99107297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Acerini CL, Miles HL, Dunger DB, Ong KK, Hughes IA. The descriptive epidemiology of congenital and acquired cryptorchidism in a UK infant cohort. Arch Dis Child. 2009;94(11):868–72. Epub 2009/06/23. adc.2008.150219 [pii] 10.1136/adc.2008.150219 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Boisen KA, Kaleva M, Main KM, Virtanen HE, Haavisto AM, Schmidt IM, et al. Difference in prevalence of congenital cryptorchidism in infants between two Nordic countries. Lancet. 2004;363(9417):1264–9. Epub 2004/04/20. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15998-9 [pii]. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gurney JK, McGlynn KA, Stanley J, Merriman T, Signal V, Shaw C, et al. Risk factors for cryptorchidism. Nat Rev Urol. 2017;14(9):534–48. 10.1038/nrurol.2017.90 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Skakkebaek NE, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Main KM. Testicular dysgenesis syndrome: an increasingly common developmental disorder with environmental aspects. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(5):972–8. 10.1093/humrep/16.5.972 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jones KC, de Voogt P. Persistent organic pollutants (POPs): state of the science. Environ Pollut. 1999;100(1–3):209–21. 10.1016/s0269-7491(99)00098-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gore AC, Chappell VA, Fenton SE, Flaws JA, Nadal A, Prins GS, et al. Executive Summary to EDC-2: The Endocrine Society's Second Scientific Statement on Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals. Endocr Rev. 2015;36(6):593–602. 10.1210/er.2015-1093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fisher M, Arbuckle TE, Liang CL, LeBlanc A, Gaudreau E, Foster WG, et al. Concentrations of persistent organic pollutants in maternal and cord blood from the maternal-infant research on environmental chemicals (MIREC) cohort study. Environ Health. 2016;15(1):59 10.1186/s12940-016-0143-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Abballe A, Guarino M, Taggi F, Traina ME, Urbani E, Valentini S, et al. Maternal blood levels of persistent organic pollutants can be used to estimate in utero exposure. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2008;44(3):281–91. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vizcaino E, Grimalt JO, Fernandez-Somoano A, Tardon A. Transport of persistent organic pollutants across the human placenta. Environ Int. 2014;65:107–15. 10.1016/j.envint.2014.01.004 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lymperi S, Giwercman A. Endocrine disruptors and testicular function. Metabolism. 2018;86:79–90. 10.1016/j.metabol.2018.03.022 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bonde JP, Flachs EM, Rimborg S, Glazer CH, Giwercman A, Ramlau-Hansen CH, et al. The epidemiologic evidence linking prenatal and postnatal exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals with male reproductive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;23(1):104–25. 10.1093/humupd/dmw036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rignell-Hydbom A, Lindh CH, Dillner J, Jonsson BA, Rylander L. A nested case-control study of intrauterine exposure to persistent organochlorine pollutants and the risk of hypospadias. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44767 Epub 2012/10/03. 10.1371/journal.pone.0044767 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Grimvall E, Rylander L, Nilsson-Ehle P, Nilsson U, Stromberg U, Hagmar L, et al. Monitoring of polychlorinated biphenyls in human blood plasma: methodological developments and influence of age, lactation, and fish consumption. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1997;32(3):329–36. Epub 1997/04/01. 10.1007/s002449900193 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Glynn AW, Wolk A, Aune M, Atuma S, Zettermark S, Maehle-Schmid M, et al. Serum concentrations of organochlorines in men: a search for markers of exposure. Sci Total Environ. 2000;263(1–3):197–208. Epub 2001/02/24. 10.1016/s0048-9697(00)00703-8 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rylander L, Bjorkdahl CM, Axmon A, Giwercman A, Jonsson BA, Lindh C, et al. Very high correlations between fresh weight and lipid-adjusted PCB-153 serum concentrations: irrespective of fasting status, age, body mass index, gender, or exposure distributions. Chemosphere. 2012;88(7):828–31. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.03.089 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Porpora MG, Lucchini R, Abballe A, Ingelido AM, Valentini S, Fuggetta E, et al. Placental transfer of persistent organic pollutants: a preliminary study on mother-newborn pairs. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10(2):699–711. 10.3390/ijerph10020699 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Logistic regression Using multivariate statistics. Boston, [Mass.];: Pearson; 2013. p. 439–509. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Welsh M, Saunders PT, Fisken M, Scott HM, Hutchison GR, Smith LB, et al. Identification in rats of a programming window for reproductive tract masculinization, disruption of which leads to hypospadias and cryptorchidism. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(4):1479–90. 10.1172/JCI34241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bergbrant S, Omling E, Bjork J, Hagander L. Cryptorchidism in Sweden: A Nationwide Study of Prevalence, Operative Management, and Complications. J Pediatr. 2018;194:197–203 e6. Epub 2018/01/15. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.09.062 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Toppari J, Kaleva M, Virtanen HE. Trends in the incidence of cryptorchidism and hypospadias, and methodological limitations of registry-based data. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7(3):282–6. Epub 2001/06/08. 10.1093/humupd/7.3.282 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jorgensen A, Lindhardt Johansen M, Juul A, Skakkebaek NE, Main KM, Rajpert-De Meyts E. Pathogenesis of germ cell neoplasia in testicular dysgenesis and disorders of sex development. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2015;45:124–37. Epub 2015/09/28. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.09.013 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cano-Sancho G, Marchand P, Le Bizec B, Antignac JP. The challenging use and interpretation of blood biomarkers of exposure related to lipophilic endocrine disrupting chemicals in environmental health studies. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2020;499:110606 Epub 2019/10/05. 10.1016/j.mce.2019.110606 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Schisterman EF, Whitcomb BW, Louis GM, Louis TA. Lipid adjustment in the analysis of environmental contaminants and human health risks. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113(7):853–7. Epub 2005/07/09. 10.1289/ehp.7640 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cnattingius S, Ericson A, Gunnarskog J, Kallen B. A quality study of a medical birth registry. Scand J Soc Med. 1990;18(2):143–8. Epub 1990/06/01. 10.1177/140349489001800209 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Damgaard IN, Skakkebaek NE, Toppari J, Virtanen HE, Shen H, Schramm KW, et al. Persistent pesticides in human breast milk and cryptorchidism. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114(7):1133–8. 10.1289/ehp.8741 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Koskenniemi JJ, Virtanen HE, Kiviranta H, Damgaard IN, Matomaki J, Thorup JM, et al. Association between levels of persistent organic pollutants in adipose tissue and cryptorchidism in early childhood: a case-control study. Environ Health. 2015;14:78 Epub 2015/09/26. 10.1186/s12940-015-0065-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bonefeld-Jorgensen EC, Andersen HR, Rasmussen TH, Vinggaard AM. Effect of highly bioaccumulated polychlorinated biphenyl congeners on estrogen and androgen receptor activity. Toxicology. 2001;158(3):141–53. Epub 2001/03/29. 10.1016/s0300-483x(00)00368-1 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hauser R, Chen Z, Pothier L, Ryan L, Altshul L. The relationship between human semen parameters and environmental exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls and p,p'-DDE. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111(12):1505–11. Epub 2003/09/02. 10.1289/ehp.6175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Atuma SS, Hansson L, Johnsson H, Slorach S, de Wit CA, Lindstrom G. Organochlorine pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls and dioxins in human milk from Swedish mothers. Food Addit Contam. 1998;15(2):142–50. 10.1080/02652039809374623 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Krysiak-Baltyn K, Toppari J, Skakkebaek NE, Jensen TS, Virtanen HE, Schramm KW, et al. Association between chemical pattern in breast milk and congenital cryptorchidism: modelling of complex human exposures. Int J Androl. 2012;35(3):294–302. 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2012.01268.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bhatia R, Shiau R, Petreas M, Weintraub JM, Farhang L, Eskenazi B. Organochlorine pesticides and male genital anomalies in the child health and development studies. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113(2):220–4. Epub 2005/02/03. 10.1289/ehp.7382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pierik FH, Klebanoff MA, Brock JW, Longnecker MP. Maternal pregnancy serum level of heptachlor epoxide, hexachlorobenzene, and beta-hexachlorocyclohexane and risk of cryptorchidism in offspring. Environmental research. 2007;105(3):364–9. Epub 2007/05/29. S0013-9351(07)00094-1 [pii] 10.1016/j.envres.2007.04.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Torres-Sanchez L, Schnaas L, Rothenberg SJ, Cebrian ME, Osorio-Valencia E, Hernandez Mdel C, et al. Prenatal p,p -DDE exposure and neurodevelopment among children 3.5–5 years of age. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121(2):263–8. Epub 2012/11/16. 10.1289/ehp.1205034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.McGlynn KA, Guo X, Graubard BI, Brock JW, Klebanoff MA, Longnecker MP. Maternal pregnancy levels of polychlorinated biphenyls and risk of hypospadias and cryptorchidism in male offspring. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117(9):1472–6. Epub 2009/09/15. 10.1289/ehp.0800389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Angela Lupattelli

9 Jun 2020

PONE-D-20-11886

Exposure to polychlorinated compounds and cryptorchidism; a nested case-control study

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Axelsson,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jul 24 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Angela Lupattelli, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

1. We noticed you have some minor occurrence of overlapping text with the following previous publication(s), which needs to be addressed:

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0044767

In your revision ensure you cite all your sources (including your own works), and quote or rephrase any duplicated text outside the methods section. Further consideration is dependent on these concerns being addressed.

Additional Editor Comments:

Dear authors,

- please avoid using the terminology "statistically significant" but rather evaluate the findings of your work on the basis of the 95% CI of the observed effect estimates.

- it would be informative to have a table summarizing the association meausures identified in the study.

- the discussion needs some further elaboration as to why the findings do/do not align with prior research, and also in light of the comments raised by the reviewers concerning risk of misclassification of exposure, residual confounding and unmeasured confounding.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors presented a study on the association between polychlorinated compounds and cryptorchidism using linkage of a Swedish biobank and national health registers. Although the research question is not new it may be relevant to study this in a relative large sample size of 165 cases and 165 controls.

My major comments to the manuscript includes

1) I would prefer to have a descriptive table on the characteristics mathced for - and although these by design should be equal in the case and control group it would be nice to see how well they fit.

2) On line 129-131 the authors stated that they decided not to include other exposures due to high correlations. The correlations reported were moderate and I would like to see the results of including additional exposures as a subanalysis or some kind of combined measure to compare with what was reported in previous studies.

3) I would prefer to see the results presented in a table in addition to the text.

4) P values from the results should be deleted since CIs gives the necessary information and p-values may be misleading since they are highly sample size dependent.

5) In the discussion add limitations: discussion of potential misclassification of exposure, outcome and matching factors and potential residual confounding.

Reviewer #2: This study investigated the associations between cryptorchidism and POPs measured in first trimester maternal serum. The results showed no significant associations. However, the authors only measured only three chemicals as representatives for POP exposures.

1. Line 70. Why do the authors collect first trimester maternal serum?

2. Line 72. Although the authors believe that PCB-153 can be a representative for PCB exposures. The individual PCBs may produce effects simultaneously.

3. Line 116. Why does this paragraph only contain one sentence?

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Jul 23;15(7):e0236394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236394.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


3 Jul 2020

Response to reviewers regarding PLOS ONE Decision: Revision required [PONE-D-20-11886] - [EMID:0c61a118f2ed1618]

Dear Editor,

We want to thank you and the reviewers for the wise comments which here will be addressed.

Our answers are shown in italics below each comment.

With best regards on behalf of all co-authors,

Jonatan Axelsson, MD, PhD

Lund University

Sweden

1. We noticed you have some minor occurrence of overlapping text with the following previous publication(s), which needs to be addressed:

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0044767

In your revision ensure you cite all your sources (including your own works), and quote or rephrase any duplicated text outside the methods section. Further consideration is dependent on these concerns being addressed.

-The text has been gone through, but the mentioned overlappings have not been clearly identified. Still, to highlight the similarity to the mentioned publication, a reference to the publication has been done on page 4, line 71-72.

Additional Editor Comments:

Dear authors,

- please avoid using the terminology "statistically significant" but rather evaluate the findings of your work on the basis of the 95% CI of the observed effect estimates.

-We have now deleted the part of the sentences regarding statistical significance.

- it would be informative to have a table summarizing the association meausures identified in the study.

-Such a table (Table 3) has now been added, and can be found on page 11.

- the discussion needs some further elaboration as to why the findings do/do not align with prior research, and also in light of the comments raised by the reviewers concerning risk of misclassification of exposure, residual confounding and unmeasured confounding.

-We agree that the discussion could benefit from being more precise, and now changed it to mention the review articles on the topic directly, and removed the references to original articles (page 15). We, thereafter, added the fact that DDE was associated with male reproductive disorders as a common entity in one of the review articles, and that this compound was the only one with a positive OR for the risk of cryptorchidism in our study.

5. Review Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1:

My major comments to the manuscript includes

1) I would prefer to have a descriptive table on the characteristics mathced for - and although these by design should be equal in the case and control group it would be nice to see how well they fit.

-Such a table has now been added as Table 1, page 8

2) On line 129-131 the authors stated that they decided not to include other exposures due to high correlations. The correlations reported were moderate and I would like to see the results of including additional exposures as a subanalysis or some kind of combined measure to compare with what was reported in previous studies.

-We have now added an analysis with a simultaneous inclusion of the three different exposure markers. This is mentioned in the end Methods section as a second sensitivity analysis, page 8. The results of this analysis is written on page 12 in the end of the Results section of the manuscript, as well as in the first paragraph of the Discussion.

3) I would prefer to see the results presented in a table in addition to the text.

-Such a table (Table 3) of the main analysis has now been added, and can be found on page 11.

4) P values from the results should be deleted since CIs gives the necessary information and p-values may be misleading since they are highly sample size dependent.

-The p values have now been deleted from the manuscript.

5) In the discussion add limitations: discussion of potential misclassification of exposure, outcome and matching factors and potential residual confounding.

-We have now added a discussion about a possible misclassification of the outcome (page 13). After this discussion we changed the formulation of the beginning of the next paragraph (line 213), and also added an additional reference to the mentioning of the study by Damgaard et al for clarification (reference 28). We have thereafter also added a discussion of possible misclassification of the exposure, and of the matching factors. It is hard to evaluate the risk of possible residual confounding since few environmental risk factors, are known. This has also been added to the discussion.

Reviewer #2: This study investigated the associations between cryptorchidism and POPs measured in first trimester maternal serum. The results showed no significant associations. However, the authors only measured only three chemicals as representatives for POP exposures.

-We have now added some reasoning around the possible relevance also for other compounds not measured (page 14, line 228-).

1. Line 70. Why do the authors collect first trimester maternal serum?

- The samples available from the biobank were taken in early pregnancy when the screening for rubella is done in Sweden. Still, we believe that these levels are representative due to correlations reported between POP levels in first trimester and levels in cord blood. This is now mentioned in the Discussion, page 13 (line 195-197).

2. Line 72. Although the authors believe that PCB-153 can be a representative for PCB exposures. The individual PCBs may produce effects simultaneously.

-It is true that individual PCBs may produce effects simultaneously. Still, at least two studies reported that PCB-153 was a good marker for the sum of PCBs in serum. We now added one of these references to the discussion on page 14, line 227 (reference 17). We have also added the correlation between PCB-153 and the possibly antiandrogenic PCB-138 on line 228-232.

3. Line 116. Why does this paragraph only contain one sentence?

-This sentence was separated from the rest of the paragraph to make it more easily discernible, but has now been moved as a final sentence to the paragraph above, since it is still related to the determination of the compounds.

As an additional change during the revision process we have limited the number of decimals in the ranges of the levels of the POPs in the different quartiles in Table 2.

Decision Letter 1

Angela Lupattelli

8 Jul 2020

Exposure to polychlorinated compounds and cryptorchidism; a nested case-control study

PONE-D-20-11886R1

Dear Dr. Axelsson,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Angela Lupattelli, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Angela Lupattelli

15 Jul 2020

PONE-D-20-11886R1

Exposure to polychlorinated compounds and cryptorchidism; a nested case-control study

Dear Dr. Axelsson:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Angela Lupattelli

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    Due to the personal data collected and potentially identifying information contained within the data, data are available upon request. Ethical approval by The Swedish Ethical Review Authority may be necessary, and requests for data may be sent to LUPOP - Lund University Population Research Platform to the email address: lupop@ed.lu.se.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES