Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2020 Jul 23;9(30):e00361-20. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00361-20

Draft Genome Sequence of Leptospira interrogans Serovar Bataviae Strain D64, Isolated from the Urine of an Asymptomatic Dog in Pathum Thani, Thailand

Pannawich Boonciew a, Alongkorn Kurilung a, Kerstin Altheimer b, Katrin Hartmann b, Nuvee Prapasarakul a,c,
Editor: Julia A Marescad
PMCID: PMC7378025  PMID: 32703826

Leptospira interrogans serovar Bataviae is one of the serovars that can infect dogs. We report the draft genome sequence of Leptospira interrogans serovar Bataviae strain D64, which was isolated from the urine of an asymptomatic dog in Pathum Thani, Thailand, in 2017.

ABSTRACT

Leptospira interrogans serovar Bataviae is one of the serovars that can infect dogs. We report the draft genome sequence of Leptospira interrogans serovar Bataviae strain D64, which was isolated from the urine of an asymptomatic dog in Pathum Thani, Thailand, in 2017.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Leptospirosis is an important infectious zoonotic disease caused by infection with pathogenic serovars of Leptospira (1). The disease occurs worldwide, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions, including Thailand (2). Leptospirosis is considered a significant health problem for humans, who are infected through mammals, mainly rodents, dogs, and cattle. Animals play an essential role through the maintenance of Leptospira spp. in their kidneys, shedding them into the environment via their urine (3, 4). In Bangkok, Thailand, and metropolitan areas, the seroprevalence in stray dogs was observed to be 12.1 to 83.5%, and Leptospira interrogans serovar Bataviae was predominant (5, 6). In this study, we present the draft genome sequence of an L. interrogans strain that was isolated from the urine of an asymptomatic dog in Pathum Thani, Thailand, in 2017.

Leptospira interrogans serovar Bataviae strain D64 was isolated from dog urine and was identified by urine culture, real-time PCR, and phylogenetic analysis, as described previously (5). Strain D64 was cultured at 28°C for 14 to 28 days in Leptospira medium base Ellinghausen-McCullough-Johnson-Harris (EMJH) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) (7) supplemented with Leptospira enrichment EMJH (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 3% rabbit serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific) under aerobic conditions and was observed by dark-field microscopy. The DNA was extracted with the DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen, Germany). The library was prepared and sequenced with the Nextera DNA Flex library preparation kit and the NovaSeq 6000 system with 150-bp paired-end run cycles (Illumina, USA). The genome reads were quality checked using FastQC v.0.11.8 (8). The genome assembly was carried out using A5-miseq v.20160825 (9). The genome statistics were evaluated using QUAST v.4.4 (10). The genome completeness was estimated using CheckM v.1.0.18 (11). The genome sequence was annotated with the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) (12). All software used default parameters. For phylogenetic analysis, the strain D64 sequence was compared to the genomes in GenBank with the BLASTn algorithm using online NCBI BLAST v.2.10.1 with default parameters (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) (13, 14).

After assembly processing, the whole-genome sequence of strain D64 yielded a total of 81 contigs and 77 scaffolds, which covered a total of 4,773,473 bp with 10,590,394 paired-end reads, an N50 value of 160,740 bp, and an average coverage of 320×. The completeness of the genome was estimated to be 96.47%. The G+C content was estimated to be 35.1%. The annotated genome sequence was predicted to contain a total of 4,043 coding sequences, with 37 tRNA genes and 3 rRNA genes. The whole-genome sequence comparison of strain D64 revealed 98.9% identity with the sequence for Leptospira interrogans serovar Bataviae strain Kariadi-Satu in the NCBI GenBank database (accession number AHQF00000000). Sequencing was performed to identify the sequence type (ST) by multilocus sequence typing (MLST) analysis with seven housekeeping genes of Leptospira using the public MLST online server (software v.2.0.4) (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/MLST) of the Center for Genomic Epidemiology with default parameters (15). MLST analysis identified seven housekeeping genes (caiB, glmU, mreA, pfkB, pntA, sucA, and tpiA) of strain D64. The MLST profile of this strain was ST50. This genome information will provide insight into the epidemiology of the Thai L. interrogans serovar Bataviae strain and support disease control strategies. The pangenome (resistome, virulome, adaptation, and evolution) in the carrier dog will be studied further.

Data availability.

The whole-genome sequence for Leptospira interrogans serovar Bataviae strain D64 was deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number WUMI00000000. The raw sequence reads were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the BioProject accession number PRJNA597667.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by the Secondary Century Fund (C2F) for Doctoral Scholarship, the Ratchadapisek Sompoch Endowment Fund (grant CU-GR_63_001_31_001-T), and the 90th Anniversary of Chulalongkorn University Fund.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Lehmann JS, Matthias MA, Vinetz JM, Fouts DE. 2014. Leptospiral pathogenomics. Pathogens 3:280–308. doi: 10.3390/pathogens3020280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chadsuthi S, Bicout DJ, Wiratsudakul A, Suwancharoen D, Petkanchanapong W, Modchang C, Triampo W, Ratanakorn P, Chalvet-Monfray K. 2017. Investigation on predominant Leptospira serovars and its distribution in humans and livestock in Thailand, 2010–2015. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 11:e0005228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tangkanakul W, Smits H, Jatanasen S, Ashford DA. 2005. Leptospirosis: an emerging health problem in Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 36:281–288. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Adler B, de la Peña Moctezuma A. 2010. Leptospira and leptospirosis. Vet Microbiol 140:287–296. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Altheimer K, Jongwattanapisan P, Luengyosluechakul S, Pusoonthornthum R, Prapasarakul N, Kurilung A, Broens EM, Wagenaar JA, Goris MGA, Ahmed AA, Pantchev N, Reese S, Hartmann K. 2020. Leptospira infection and shedding in dogs in Thailand. BMC Vet Res 16:89. doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-2230-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jittapalapong S, Sittisan P, Sakpuaram T, Kabeya H, Maruyama S, Inpankaew T. 2009. Coinfection of Leptospira spp. and Toxoplasma gondii among stray dogs in Bangkok, Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 40:247–252. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ellinghausen HC, McCullough WG. 1965. Nutrition of Leptospira pomona and growth of 13 other serotypes: fractionation of oleic albumin complex and a medium of bovine albumin and polysorbate 80. Am J Vet Res 26:45–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc.
  • 9.Coil D, Jospin G, Darling AE. 2015. A5-miseq: an updated pipeline to assemble microbial genomes from Illumina MiSeq data. Bioinformatics 31:587–589. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhang Z, Schwartz S, Wagner L, Miller W. 2000. A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. J Comput Biol 7:203–214. doi: 10.1089/10665270050081478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Morgulis A, Coulouris G, Raytselis Y, Madden TL, Agarwala R, Schäffer AA. 2008. Database indexing for production MegaBLAST searches. Bioinformatics 24:1757–1764. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Larsen MV, Cosentino S, Rasmussen S, Friis C, Hasman H, Marvig RL, Jelsbak L, Sicheritz-Pontén T, Ussery DW, Aarestrup FM, Lund O. 2012. Multilocus sequence typing of total-genome-sequenced bacteria. J Clin Microbiol 50:1355–1361. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06094-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The whole-genome sequence for Leptospira interrogans serovar Bataviae strain D64 was deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number WUMI00000000. The raw sequence reads were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the BioProject accession number PRJNA597667.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES