Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2020 Jul 23;10:12291. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68922-2

Antibacterial and antifungal activity of crude and freeze-dried bacteriocin-like inhibitory substance produced by Pediococcus pentosaceus

Pamela Oliveira de Souza de Azevedo 1, Carlos Miguel Nóbrega Mendonça 1, Ana Carolina Ramos Moreno 2, Antonio Vinicius Iank Bueno 3, Sonia Regina Yokomizo de Almeida 4, Liane Seibert 5, Attilio Converti 6, Ii-Sei Watanabe 4, Martin Gierus 7, Ricardo Pinheiro de Souza Oliveira 1,
PMCID: PMC7378238  PMID: 32704020

Abstract

Pediococcus pentosaceus LBM 18 has shown potential as producer of an antibacterial and antifungal bacteriocin-like inhibitory substance (BLIS). BLIS inhibited the growth of spoilage bacteria belonging to Lactobacillus, Enterococcus and Listeria genera with higher activity than Nisaplin used as control. It gave rise to inhibition halos with diameters from 9.70 to 20.00 mm, with Lactobacillus sakei being the most sensitive strain (13.50–20.00 mm). It also effectively suppressed the growth of fungi isolated from corn grain silage for up to 25 days and impaired morphology of colonies by likely affecting fungal membranes. These results point out that P. pentosaceus BLIS may be used as a new promising alternative to conventional antibacterial and antifungal substances, with potential applications in agriculture and food industry as a natural bio-controlling agent. Moreover, cytotoxicity and cell death induction tests demonstrated cytotoxicity and toxicity of BLIS to human colon adenocarcinoma Caco-2cells but not to peripheral blood mononuclear cells, with suggests possible applications of BLIS also in medical-pharmaceutical applications.

Subject terms: Biochemistry, Biotechnology, Microbiology

Introduction

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are a group of well-distributed microorganisms in nature13 having lactic acid as the major product of sugar fermentation4,5. They are Gram-positive, non-pathogenic, non-sporulating, facultative anaerobic, catalase negative and acid tolerant bacteria with a strictly fermentative metabolism3,6, which are often used as industrial starter cultures in food fermentation technology7,8. Their metabolic products are recognized as Generally Regarded as Safe (GRAS) by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and recommended by the Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS) list of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)9. This means that they can be safely used to preserve foods10,11, hence offering important benefits to the food industry12.

From the technology point of view, the most important genera of LAB are Aerococcus, Carnobacterium, Enterococcus, Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Leuconostoc, Oenococcus, Pediococcus, Streptococcus, Tetragenococcus, Vagococcus and Weissella13,14. In addition to the acidic conditions ensured in foods, these microorganims also produce several antimicrobial agents like hydrogen peroxide, ethanol, diacetyl, carbon dioxide and bacteriocins, which may be exploited to preserve foods1,15 and livestock feeds such as silage. Inadequade fermentation and poor feed-out management of silage were in fact reported to lead to its spoilage and flavor proliferation and transmission of pathogens1618.

Bacteriocins are ribosomally-synthesized peptides exerting their antimicrobial activity against either strains of the same species or against species more distantly related to the bacteriocin producer1921. Since these compounds are easily accepted by consumers because of their natural origin15, studies on their production and application have been increasing in the last years. BLIS is the term recommended for not yet completely characterized antimicrobial peptides or proteins with unusual amino acids, having different chemical structures22 and exerting bactericidal or bacteriostatic action against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, without affecting the producer2327. Bacteriocins and BLIS have cationic and amphiphilic structures with variable physicochemical characteristics in terms of molecular mass, amino acid sequence and isoelectric point24,28,29. Normally they undergo post-translational modifications and are released to the outer environment or remain bound to cell membrane of the producing bacterium24.

Nisin, the most studied bacteriocin, is authorized by FDA for use in foods and regulated as a food additive in 48 countries to preserve products such as milk, dairy products, tomato and other canned vegetables, canned soups, mayonnaise and infant foods30,31. It is produced by several strains of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis10,27,32,33 and commercialized by DuPont Danisco under the trade name Nisaplin. Nisaplin has a broad spectrum of action against Gram-positive bacteria, including LAB34, but, generally, it is hardly effective against Gram-negative bacteria, molds and yeasts30,31.

Another bacteriocin with promising future as food industrial preservative35,36 is pediocin, which is produced by members of the genus Pediococcus. Several pediocins have been characterized37, which may be used as preservatives of foods for humans and farm animals, including vegetables, meat products, cheese and grass or corn silages38. They exhibit important technological properties such as thermostability and capacity to retain antimicrobial activity in a wide range of pH, especially against Gram-positive food spoilage and foodborne pathogenic bacteria37,39, but also against yeasts, molds, filamentous fungi and mushrooms40.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of BLIS produced by Pediococcus pentosaceus LBM 18, either in its crude or freeze-dried form, as a promising new preservative against fungi in corn grain silage.

Materials and methods

Microbial cultures

The BLIS-producing strain Pediococcus pentosaceus LBM 18 was isolated from corn silage, while all media were acquired from Roth (Karlsruhe, Germany). It was cultivated in commercial de Man, Rogosa and Sharp (MRS) medium at 30 °C for 10 h in an incubator without stirring. Lactobacillus sakei ATCC 15521, Enterococcus faecium 2052, Listeria innocua NCTC 11288 and Listeria seeligeri NCTC 11289 were used as indicator strains. L. sakei and E. faecium were overnight cultivated at 37 °C in MRS medium, while Listeria strains in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) medium under the same conditions. Fungi isolated from Austrian corn grain silage41 were cultivated in Potato Extract Glucose (PEG) medium at 30 °C in an incubator without stirring for at least three days, since fast-growing fungi can be detected after two days of cultivation42. Following manufacturer’s instructions, all the culture media were autoclaved (2,540 ELV, Tuttnauer, Hauppauge, NY, USA) at 121 °C for 12 min (MRS) or 15 min (BHI and PEG).

Cultivations for BLIS production

BLIS was produced in static P. pentosaceus cultivations carried out at 30 °C for 10 h in 500-mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 300 mL of MRS medium placed in an incubator. BLIS-containing medium was separated from Pediococcus biomass by centrifugation (4,470 × g at 4 °C for 20 min), and the supernatant pH adjusted to 6.0–6.5 by addition of 1.0 N NaOH for use in the analyses. Crude BLIS (CB), i.e. BLIS without any purification, was tested for its activity against the above indicator strains after several dilutions with sterile deionized water, namely 1:2, 1:5, 1:10, 1:50 and 1:100 (v/v). Freeze-dried crude BLIS (FB) was tested at three different concentrations, namely 1.0, 2.5 and 5.0% (w/v), after its dilution with sterile deionized water.

Nisaplin (DuPont Danisco, Copenhagen, Denmark), having nisin in its formulation as an active compound at 2.5% (w/w), was also diluted with sterile deionized water up to the same concentrations as FB (1.0, 2.5 and 5.0%, w/v) and used for comparison with BLIS antimicrobial power.

Determination of BLIS antibacterial activity

The agar-well diffusion method was performed to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of CB, FB and Nisin against L. sakei. For this purpose, after overnight bacterial growth at 37 °C, 150 µL of each microbial suspension with 0.3 optical density at 600 nm (OD600nm), corresponding to 8 × 106 CFU/mL for L. sakei and 3 × 106 CFU/mL for E. faecium, L. innocua and L. seeligeri, were 1:100 (v/v) diluted with sterile deionized water, added to 15 mL of MRS soft agar-medium (0.75%, w/v) and poured into Petri dishes. After agar-medium solidification, 50 μL of BLIS or Nisin were added into each well, plates were incubated at 37 °C for 16–18 h, and the antagonistic activity was determined by measuring the diameter of the inhibition halos in millimeters43.

The antagonistic activity of CB without dilution or diluted several times [from 1:2 to 1:100 (v/v)] was also evaluated by counting colonies according to the pour plate methodology. All the assays were performed in triplicate.

Determination of BLIS antifungal activity

Fungi isolated from Austrian corn grain silage41 were grown in PEG medium in an incubator at 30 °C for 3–5 days. After incubation, CB was applied directly on the different mycelia, and the seven fungi that proved to be sensitive to CB were isolated from the plates, named from F1 to F7 and grown separately. Sensitive fungi were evaluated by the pour plate technique, after addition of 1.0 mL of sample, consisting of 500 µL of fungus suspension and 500 µL of CB (or 500 µL of sterile deionized water in the control), to 10 mL of Yeast Extract Glucose (YEG) agar medium (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany), and incubation at 30 °C for 24 h, 7 days, 15 days and 25 days. After these periods, mycelial growth in both treated and control Petri dishes were visually examined.

BLIS exposure to hydrolytic enzymes

The effect of various hydrolytic enzymes on BLIS activity was also tested. Aliquots of BLIS solution (1.4 mL) were incubated with 100 µL of 2.0 mg/mL trypsin, pepsin, papain (Interlab, São Paulo, SP, Brazil), proteinase K or α-amylase (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at 37 °C for 1 h. Samples were placed in water bath at 90 °C for 3 min for enzyme inactivation. Untreated BLIS served as a control.

Protein quantification

Protein quantification of CB and solutions of BLIS (1:2, 1:5, 1:10, 1:50, 1:100, 1:250, 1:500, 1:1,000 and 1:5,000), diluted in sterile deionized water (v/v), was performed using the Bicinchoninic Acid Protein Assay Kit BCA1 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) according to the manufacturer. For comparison, commercial pediocin from Pediococcus acidilactici (P0098, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was also used. The unknown protein content of samples (CP) was assessed by means of absorbance readings at 560 nm (Abs) and a calibration curve (CP = 0.0015 Abs + 0.431; R2 = 0.992) previously constructed using Kit reagents with known protein concentration.

Physical characterization of BLIS

Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR) (Frontier—PerkinElmer, Massachusetts, USA) was used for a partial physical characterization of BLIS, since it allows qualitatively identifying unknown functional chemical groups43,44 in any different kind of material. For this purpose, 1.0 mg of lyophilized BLIS was milled with 100 mg of KBr at a pressure of 7,500 kg cm-2 per 30 s, and the resulting translucent disks were analyzed by FT-IR 45 in the 4,000–400 cm-1 wavenumber range with resolution of 4 cm-1.

CB dissolved in deuterated water was also analyzed by 1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) with a Bruker AIII 500 spectrometer (Bruker, Rheinstetten, Germany) at 500 MHz, to find out different amino acids that form the molecular structure of BLIS46. The 1H chemical shifts were expressed in ppm with respect to the standard solvent displacement.

Scanning electron microscopy

To examine P. pentosaceus cells, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) was used as previously described47. For this purpose, samples were prepared as follows. After cultivation, the culture medium was removed by centrifugation at 5,000 rpm and 4 ºC for 20 min. In order to remove contaminants from the culture medium and free biomass from the viscous matrix formed during fermentation, the pellet obtained was redispersed in 100 mL of deionized water and subjected to several cycles of centrifugation under the same conditions described above and washing with an equal water volume, until a milky color liquid was obtained. The viscous matrix was then redispersed in 50 mL of deionized water and cryogenically frozen by immersion and cooling to a temperature of − 196 ºC using liquid nitrogen. The sample water was subsequently removed by lyophilization, and the resulting white solid with flocculated consistency was preserved in a desiccator at room temperature for further analysis. The samples were mounted on metal stubs with a conductive paste and coated with gold or gold–palladium in an argon-ion atmosphere, and examined in a Scanning Electron Microscope, model Neoscope JCM-5000 (JEOL, Peabody, MA, USA).

Cytotoxicity of BLIS to human cells

To assess the cytotoxicity of BLIS to human cells, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and human colon adenocarcinoma cells (Caco-2) were used48. In 96-well plates, 2.5 × 105 cells per well were plated in 100 µL of culture medium [RPMI (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) for PBMC cells or DMEN (Gibco) for Caco-2 cells] supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. Plates were incubated in a 5% CO2 oven at 37 °C for 24 h to allow cell adhesion. After 24 h of incubation, crude BLIS without any dilution was added to the wells, and plates were incubated again for 48 h. The control was prepared in the same way but without adding the BLIS. Each test was performed in triplicate. After incubation, the content of each well was removed, and 100 µL of 20 µg/ml 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazoline bromide (MTT) were added. Plates were incubated for 3 h under the same conditions mentioned above. The MTT solution was then removed from the wells, and 200 µL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were added. After smooth homogenization of plate content to dissolve formazan crystals, the absorbance was read at a wavelength of 570 nm.

Cell death induction assay

After cultivation, removal of the culture medium and treatment with BLIS as described in the previous section, cells were stained with 100 µL of 50 µg/mL acridine orange solution and 50 µg/mL propidium iodide prepared in phosphate saline buffer (PBS). After 5 min of incubation, acquisition of images was done using a fluorescence microscope (Axiovert 200, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). According to this methodology, viable cells stained green, due to the presence of acridine orange, while dead cells stained red because of propidium iodide.

Statistical analysis

The results, expressed as mean values ± standard deviations, were submitted to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) by the Statistica Software 12 (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA), compared using the Tukey’s post-hoc test and considered significantly different when p < 0.05.

Results and discussion

Antibacterial activity

The ability of Pediococcus pentosaceus LBM 18 to produce bacteriocin-like inhibitory substance (BLIS) and its effectiveness as an antimicrobial agent were first evaluated by the agar well diffusion assay. As shown in Table 1, all the indicator strains were sensitive to BLIS, exhibiting large diameters of the inhibition halos (9.70 to 20.00 mm), with Lactobacillus sakei being the most sensitive one (13.50 to 20.00 mm), regardless of BLIS dilution. Even though BLIS was used in its crude form (CB), it showed higher antimicrobial activity (larger inhibition halos) against all indicator strains compared to 1% (w/v) nisin-based Nisaplin solution.

Table 1.

Inhibition of growth of bioindicator strains after treatment with 1% (w/v) Nisaplin or Crude BLIS (CB) with or without dilution, expressed as diameter of inhibition halo (mm) or counts of colony forming units (log CFU/mL).

Inhibition Antimicrobial and dilution (v/v) Bioindicator strains
Ls15521 En2052 Li11288 Lse11289
Halo diameter (mm) CB 20.00 ± 0.20 14.50 ± 0.10 15.00 ± 0.10 14.00 ± 0.10
1:2 CB 19.00 ± 0.40 15.80 ± 0.30 15.00 ± 0.20 15.50 ± 0.20
1:5 CB 18.00 ± 0.30 16.70 ± 0.20 15.70 ± 0.30 16.00 ± 0.10
1:10 CB 15.00 ± 0.20 17.00 ± 0.20 16.50 ± 0.10 17.00 ± 0.20
1:50 CB 14.00 ± 0.20 14.50 ± 0.10 11.00 ± 0.10 14.50 ± 0.10
1:100 CB 13.50 ± 0.30 12.00 ± 0.10 10.00 ± 0.10 13.50 ± 0.10
Nisaplin 13.30 ± 0.40 12.50 ± 0.20 9.70 ± 0.10 12.50 ± 0.20
Counts (logCFU/mL) C 7.54 ± 0.08 7.02 ± 0.04 8.25 ± 0.06 8.21 ± 0.06
CB ˂ 4 ˂ 4 ˂ 4 7.81 ± 0.10
1:2 CB ˂ 4 ˂ 4 ˂ 4 ˂ 4
1:5 CB ˂ 4 ˂ 4 7.96 ± 0.10 ˂ 4
1:10 CB ˂ 4 ˂ 4 8.22 ± 0.00 7.47 ± 0.00
1:50 CB ˂ 4 ˂ 4 8.11 ± 0.29 8.27 ± 0.06
1:100 CB ˂ 4 ˂ 4 8.11 ± 0.31 8.27 ± 0.06
Nisaplin ˂ 4 ˂ 4 ˂ 4 ˂ 4

C: control (water), Ls15521: Lactobacillus sakei ATCC 15521, En2052: Enterococcus faecium 2052, Li11288: Listeria innocua NCTC 11288, Ls11289: Listeria seeligeri NCTC 11289. Values are the means of triplicates ± standard deviations.

BLIS was shown to be more effective when diluted in water, especially at 1:5 and 1:10 (v/v) dilutions (Table 1), likely because of better diffusion through the bacterial cell membrane. At the highest dilutions (1:50 and 1:100), BLIS still exerted a weak antibacterial effect against all strains, with significantly (p < 0.05) narrower inhibition halos (10.00 to 14.50 mm).

BLIS antibacterial effect was also checked by counting colonies according to the pour plate method, whose results are listed in Table 1. Both CB and BLIS at any dilutions were as effective as Nisaplin in suppressing L. sakei and E. faecium growth (logCFU/mL < 4), irrespective of dilution. Listeria strains proved to be less sensitive, in that L. innocua growth was completely suppressed (logCFU/mL < 4) only by CB and 1:2 (v/v) water-diluted BLIS and L. seeligeri by 1:2 and 1:5 (v/v) water-diluted BLIS. The strain-dependent efficiency of CB or water-diluted BLIS may be explained by interaction between BLIS and plasma membrane and consequent formation of pores, which is a common occurrence among most LAB bacteriocins. BLIS may have also interacted with receptors or docking molecules, in a specific way for a specific strain depending on its membrane lipid composition and membrane potential threshold49, abrogating essential cell pathways which account for BLIS potency50. At the other BLIS dilutions (1:10, 1:50 and 1:100, v/v), L. innocua showed growth (logCFU/mL = 8.22 ± 0.00, 8.11 ± 0.29, 8.11 ± 0.31, respectively) similar to that in the control (logCFU/mL = 8.25 ± 0.06). Also, L. seeligeri, when exposed to 1:50 and 1:100 (v/v) diluted BLIS, practically achieved the same counts (logCFU/mL 8.27 ± 0.06) as in the control (logCFU/mL = 8.21 ± 0.06). These results confirm the known broad spectrum of action of P. pentosaceus bacteriocins, especially against the members of Listeria genus. To provide only a few examples, the antimicrobial activity of P. pentosaceus BLIS was proven against different strain of L. monocytogenes. In particular, Yin et al.51 isolated from pork meat two P. pentosaceus bacteriocins, named as pentocins L and S, which exhibited antimicrobial activity against L. monocytogenes RII, LM and CCRC 14845. The antimicrobial activity of bacteriocins produced by P. pentosaceus was also reported against Staphylococcus aureus 196E52, spores of several Clostridium botulinum strains53, C. botulinum ATCC 1125951 and LAB such as Lactobacillus plantarum LB 75 and LB 592, L. sakei LB 706 and LB 59254, which suggests the use of this microorganism to produce novel antimicrobials.

The efficiency of BLIS as an antibacterial was also tested after freeze-drying (Table 2) to check whether its antimicrobial activity would be impaired by this operation. Regardless of BLIS concentration (1.0, 2.5 or 5.0%, w/v), its ability to reduce L. sakei counts (logCFU/mL) was in the range 0.5–0.6, which suggests the existence of a threshold amount for bacteriocin to exert a bacteriostatic or bactericidal effect against closely related species like L. sakei, while Nisaplin was much more effective, being able to completely suppress it (logCFU/mL < 4) regardless of its concentration (1.0, 2.5 and 5.0%, w/v) or dilution.

Table 2.

Antibacterial activity against Lactobacillus sakei ATCC 15521 of freeze-dried BLIS or Nisaplin at different concentrations with or without dilution, expressed as counts of colony forming units (log CFU/mL).

Dilution (v/v) Freeze-dried BLIS Nisaplin
1.0% (w/v) 2.5% (w/v) 5.0% (w/v) 1.0% (w/v) 2.5% (w/v) 5.0% (w/v)
C 8.16 ± 0.10 8.16 ± 0.10 8.16 ± 0.10 8.16 ± 0.10 8.16 ± 0.08 8.16 ± 0.10
WD 8.15 ± 0.07 7.96 ± 0.42 8.06 ± 0.18 ˂ 4 ˂ 4 ˂ 4
1:2 7.54 ± 0.08 7.81 ± 0.04 8.10 ± 0.04 ˂ 4 ˂ 4 ˂ 4
1:5 7.54 ± 0.08 7.62 ± 0.21 7.52 ± 0.00 ˂ 4 ˂ 4 ˂ 4
1:10 7.74 ± 0.12 7.62 ± 0.21 7.70 ± 0.08 ˂ 4 ˂ 4 ˂ 4
1:50 7.58 ± 0.15 7.74 ± 0.05 7.71 ± 0.33 ˂ 4 ˂ 4 ˂ 4
1:100 7.65 ± 0.15 7.60 ± 0.21 7.54 ± 0.08 ˂ 4 ˂ 4 ˂ 4

C: control (water), WD: without dilution. Values are the means of triplicates ± standard deviations.

In summary, the results of this part of the study clearly show that P. pentosaceus LBM 18 BLIS exerted higher antimicrobial effect when directly used after its production rather than after freeze-drying. Moreover, BLIS proved its antimicrobial action even without any purification, showing potential as a novel biopreservative alternative to nisin-based preparations.

Antifungal activity of BLIS

LAB were shown to produce, during growth, antifungals, inhibitors of mycotoxin synthesis and mycotoxin detoxifying agents, which are in great demand by the agricultural and food sectors9. It has been proven their ability to produce fatty acids55, cyclic dipeptides56, proteinaceous compounds57, organic acids5860, bacteriocins and BLIS61 with potent antifungal effect62, whose action seems to occur, in some cases, through damage of fungal membrane63, but it is still unknown in other cases.

In general, BLIS production by P. pentosaceus begins during the exponential growth phase64, reaches a maximum in the early stationary phase, and then quickly decreases; in contrast, Dalie et al.65 observed that the production of antifungal metabolites by the strain P. pentosaceus L006 was not growth dependent and achieved a maximum at the end of the stationary growth phase.

Aspergillus spp. are spoilage microorganisms that are able to release mycotoxins in cereal grains66. To check the potential antifungal activity of P. pentosaceus LBM 18 BLIS, CB was applied directly to one of the fungal isolates (F1) from Austrian corn grain silage, which was apparently an Aspergillus (Fig. 1). Fungus damage was evident after 2 days of contact with CB from the prevention of mycelium expansion from the place of its application. This observation agrees with the antifungal effect observed against Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus flavus after exposure to cell-free culture of P. pentosaceus isolated from barley sourdough67.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Antagonistic effect of crude BLIS produced by Pediococcus pentosaceus LBM 18 after 10 h of cultivation at 30 °C against the F1, F3 and F4 fungal isolates from Austrian corn grain silage. F1: (a) Before treatment; (b) 1 day after treatment; (c) 2 days after treatment. F3 and F4 after 3 months of treatment: (a) Control (water); (b) 1:10 (v/v) water-diluted BLIS.

Fungal spoilage and mycotoxin contamination are the greatest risks during storage of feed like silage. Silage is a traditional way to preserve farm animal feed for extended periods of time when feed is limited or unavailable68,69. It consists in green forage preservation by spontaneous lactic fermentation under anaerobic conditions70,71, whose primary purpose is to maximize nutritive value with minimum loss71. However, forage used for making silage is naturally in contact with yeasts and filamentous fungi present in the harvested biomass, or contamination may occur during harvesting, transport and storage. Growth of yeasts occurs under aerobic conditions, leading to loss of nutrients and dry matter, favoring the formation of butyric acid, reducing palatability and, consequently, shattering silage consumption72.

Most of studies published on this issue demonstrated a certain incidence of fungi in silage, which results in alteration or even deterioration of its nutritional value, being fungal distribution quite similar among different countries. However, the main fungi isolated from silage belong to Aspergillus, Penicillium and Fusarium genera, with high incidence of potentially toxicogenic species such as A. flavus, Aspergillus parasiticus, Aspergillus fumigatus, Penicillium roqueforti, Fusarium verticilloides and Fusarium graminearum71.

In the present study, seven CB-sensitive fungi were isolated from Austrian corn grain silage41. Since CB was more effective as antibacterial agent after 1:5 and 1:10 (v/v) dilution with sterile deionized water (Table 1), both dilutions were tested against fungi. The 1:10 (v/v) water-diluted BLIS was very effective to inhibit the growth of two fungal isolates, named as F3 and F4, after 3-months of treatment (Fig. 1), while the 1:5 (v/v) one was effective against four other isolates, named as F2, F5 (Fig. 2), F6 and F7 (Fig. 3) until 7 and 15 days. After 25 days of 1:5 (v/v) water-diluted BLIS treatment, the F2, F5 (Fig. 2), F6 and F7 (Fig. 3) isolates were able to grow, but their growth was visibly impaired compared to the control (water). In addition, fungi that grew after 25 days of treatment had completely different morphology compared to the control, indicating a severe damage caused by the contact with BLIS. Such a damage may be ascribed to some effect of BLIS on fungal membrane and the observed variations to a sensitivity dependence on the species and/or strain, which may be related to different capacities to change the cell metabolism in response to stress conditions63,67,72.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Antagonistic effect of BLIS produced by Pediococcus pentosaceus LBM 18 after 10 h of cultivation at 30 °C against the F2 and F5 fungal isolates from Austrian corn grain silage after (a) 24 h, (b) 7 days, (c) 15 days and (d) 25 days of treatment. (Left) Control (water); (Right) 1:5 (v/v) water-diluted BLIS.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Antagonistic effect of BLIS produced by Pediococcus pentosaceus LBM 18 after 10 h of cultivation at 30 °C against the F6 and F7 fungal isolates from Austrian corn grain silage after (a) 24 h, (b) 7 days, (c) 15 days and (d) 25 days of treatment. (Left) Control (water); (Right) 1:5 (v/v) water-diluted BLIS.

These results agree with literature reports, in which Pediococcus genus has proven to be promising in the production of antifungal molecules57,73. For instance, P. pentosaceus L006 isolated from maize leaves was able to control the growth of mycotoxigenic molds such as a fumonisin-producing fungus65, while Pediococcus acidilactici LAB 5 isolated from meat was able to suppress the growth of food and feedborne molds and plant-pathogenic fungi73.

Sensitivity of BLIS to hydrolytic enzymes

To assess the antibacterial activity of CB either before or after treatment with proteolytic enzymes, L. sakei was used as an indicator strain after 1:100 (v/v) dilution of a suspension with 0.3 OD600nm in sterile deionized water. Non-treated CB exhibited an inhibition halo as large as 19.00 mm, while the treated one completely lost (100.0%) his activity (results not shown) after treatment with all proteolytic enzymes. Whereas the treatment with trypsin, pepsin and papain confirms the proteinaceous nature of BLIS, that with α-amylase suggests a complex structure74 with a saccharide moiety playing an important role in biological activity75. In addition, since there are only few examples of circular bacteriocins or BLIS resistant to proteolysis7678, these results taken together indicate that BLIS produced by Pediococcus pentosaceus LBM 18 may be a linear proteinaceous glycoactive compound.

Protein quantification

To obtain additional information on BLIS structure, CB protein content without any enzymatic treatment was determined after increasing dilutions (up to 1: 500 v/v) in sterile deionized water. As shown in Table 3, the 1:50 (v/v) and 1:100 (v/v) dilution allowed reducing CB protein content from 3.00 ± 0.74 g/mL to values (0.06 ± 0.01 g/mL and 0.04 ± 0.01 g/mL, respectively) close to that of commercial pediocins (0.05 g/mL), which are low molecular weight (2.7–4.0 kDa) peptides. Therefore, it can be inferred that the BLIS produced in this study may be a larger protein than commercial pediocins. Indeed, there are reports in the literature of bacteriocins with very large molecular size (> 10 kDa), which should then be classified as proteins rather than peptides7983.

Table 3.

Concentration (g/mL) of total proteins released from Crude BLIS (CB), diluted or without dilution, with or without enzymatic treatment, compared with commercial pediocin.

Samples Protein concentration (g/mL)
CB 3.00 ± 0.74
1:2 (v/v) CB 2.21 ± 0.34
1:5 (v/v) CB 1.87 ± 0.71
1:10 (v/v) CB 1.45 ± 0.14
1:50 (v/v) CB 0.06 ± 0.01
1:100 (v/v) CB 0.04 ± 0.01
1:250 (v/v) CB 0.03 ± 0.00
1:500 (v/v) CB 0.03 ± 0.00
1:1,000 (v/v) CB 0.03 ± 0.00
1:5,000 (v/v) CB 0.02 ± 0.01
CB + trypsin 2.90 ± 0.81
CB + pepsin 2.91 ± 0.46
CB + papain 2.66 ± 0.71
CB + proteinase K 2.56 ± 0.51
CB + α-amylase 2.90 ± 0.96
Pediocin 0.05 ± 0.00

Values are the means of duplicates ± standard deviations.

BLIS physical characterization

BLIS was partially characterized by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR) and 1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (1H NMR).

FT-IR is a useful technique that allows identifying functional groups and then elucidating the chemical structure of unknown molecules. The FT-IR spectrum of BLIS produced by P. pentosaceus LBM 18 after 10 h of cultivation (Fig. 4) points out the presence of bands located at 1691 and 1745 cm-1 corresponding to carbonyls of carboxylic acids and amides, respectively, while those in the region of 1,700–1,550 cm-1 are characteristic of polysaccharides and are usually attributed to C=O stretching84. The absorption band at 3,730 cm-1 can be assigned to C-NH2 stretching85. Possibly, the stretching vibration at 1745 cm-1 may be attributed to the carbonyl bonded to the C-NH2 group, which would correspond to the presence of an amide in the biomolecule under study.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR) spectrum of BLIS produced by Pediococcus pentosaceus LBM 18 after 10 h of cultivation.

Chemical shifts of carbon and hydrogen atoms in NMR spectra give significant information about structures85,86. Some peaks (signals) in the 1H NMR spectrum (0.9, 1.3–1.5 and 2.0 ppm) correspond to the signals of protons of the aliphatic chains R-CH3, R-CH2-R and R-CH-R, respectively, while peaks between 3.3–4.0 ppm to CH2-O and H-C–OH groups (Fig. 5). Peaks between 7.0–7.5 ppm and 5.0–9.0 ppm correspond to the aromatic ring and amides, respectively87.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectrum of BLIS produced by Pediococcus pentosaceus LBM 18 after 10 h of cultivation.

While the amidic groups identified by FT-IR may be easily ascribed mainly to BLIS, the nature of polysaccharides required additional information, for which we resorted to Scanning Electronic Microscopy. One can see in Fig. 6 that P. pentosaceus LBM cells tended to form aggregates, which suggests that at least a significant portion of them may be constituted by exopolysaccharides typically involved in the formation of biofilms by species of the same genus88.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Micrograph of Pediococcus pentosaceus LBM18 cells obtained by Scanning Electron Microscopy. Magnification: × 2000.

Cytotoxicity of BLIS in human cells

Figure 7 shows that BLIS was not cytotoxic to peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), the absorbance of viable cells treated with BLIS (0.9–1.0) being very close to that of untreated ones (control) (1.0–1.2). In contrast, it demonstrated cytotoxicity to human colon adenocarcinoma Caco-2cells, since the treatment led to a drop in the absorbance of viable cells from 2.7–3.0 in the control to only 2.1–2.3. Moreover, unlike PBMCs, the treatment with BLIS impaired the morphology of Caco-2 cells in culture.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Cytotoxicity profile of (a) peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and (B) human colon adenocarcinoma Caco-2 cells after 48 h of treatment with the BLIS produced by P. pentosaceus after 10 h of culture. On the left: Absorbance of viable cells. On the right: Micrographs of cells in culture.

Cell death induction assay

It is evident in Fig. 8a that BLIS was not toxic to PBMCs, as the treated cells remained alive after 48 h of treatment with no relevant difference with the control. In contrast, as suggested by a significantly higher number of dead cells than in the control, BLIS was found to be toxic to Caco-2 cells after the same time (Fig. 8b). This result, which is quite encouraging since the targets are tumor cells, suggests possible applications of BLIS not only in food preservation, but also in medical-pharmaceutical applications.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Induction of cell death in (a) peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and (b) human colon adenocarcinoma cells Caco-2 after 48 h of treatment with the BLIS produced by P. pentosaceus after 10 h of culture. Viable and dead cells are stained green and red, respectively.

Conclusions

Novel antimicrobial molecules able to act as biopreservatives, instead of chemical preservatives, are of great interest for the feed and food industry mainly from the microbiological safety and food security viewpoints. Pediococcus pentosaceus LBM 18 BLIS inhibited the growth of spoilage bacteria belonging to Lactobacillus, Enterococcus and Listeria genera and effectively suppressed the growth of fungi isolated from corn grain silage for up to 25 days, impairing the morphology of their colonies likely affecting fungal membranes. The results of the present study showed the effectiveness of BLIS produced by the strain P. pentosaceus LBM 18 as an antibacterial and antifungal biomolecule, which may find possible applications in agriculture and food industry as a natural bio-controlling agent. Future efforts will deal with BLIS structural characterization and the mechanism of its interaction with target microorganisms.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by São Paulo Research Foundation—FAPESP (Grants #2018/04385–8 and #2018/25511–1), by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brazil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001 and by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development—CNPq. The authors are very grateful for the technical support provided by Prof. Francesco Molinari from the Department of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences of the University of Milan (Italy). Also, the authors would like to thank Prof Dr Martin Wagner and Dr Luminita Ciolacu from the Institute of Milk Hygiene, Milk Technology and Food Science, Department for Farm Animals and Veterinary Public Health of the University of Veterinary Medicine (Vienna, Austria) for kindly provided the strains L. innocua NCTC 11288 and L. seeligeri NCTC 11289.

Author contributions

P.O.S.A. and R.P.S.O. designed the project. P.O.S.A., C.M.N.M., A.C.R.M., A.V.I.B., L.S., and S.R.Y.A conducted the experiments. R.P.S.O., A.C., I-S. W and M.G. analyzed the results. P.O.S.A. and C.M.N.M. wrote the manuscript. A.C., M.G., and R.P.S.O. edited the manuscript.

Competing interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Ponce AG, Moreira MR, Del Valle CE, Roura SI. Preliminary characterization of bacteriocin-like substances from lactic acid bacteria isolated from organic leasy vegetables. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2008;41:432–441. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2007.03.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Saguir FM, Loto Campos IE, Maturano C, Nadra MCM. Identification of dominant lactic acid bacteria isolated from grape juices. Assessment of its biochemical activities relevant to flavor development in wine. Int. J. Wine Res. 2009;1:175–185. doi: 10.2147/IJWR.S4567. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.M.F., Kruger, Characterization of the bacteriocin produced by Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis isolated MK02R rocket salad (Euruca sativa Mill) and evaluation of its potential probiotic using the dynamic model TIM-1. University of São Paulo, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, PhD Thesis, 2010, pp. 1–117. 10.11606/T.9.2013.tde-28082013-164445.
  • 4.Klaenhammer TR, Barrangou R, Buck BL, Azcarte-Peril MA, Altermann E. Genomic features of lactic acid bacteria effecting bioprocessing and health. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2005;29:393–409. doi: 10.1016/j.femsre.2005.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.L. Axelsson, Lactic acid bacteria: classification and physiology. In Lactic acid bacteria: microbiology and functional aspects (eds. Salminen, S. & Von Wright, A.) 1–72 (Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1998)s
  • 6.Górska, S., Grycko, P., Rybka, J., & Gamian, A. Exopolysaccharides of lactic acid bacteria: structure and biosynthesis. Postḝpy Higieny i Medycyny Doświadczalnej 14 (2007) 805–818. https://www.phmd.pl/pub/phmd/vol_61/11521.pdf. [PubMed]
  • 7.Leroy F, De Vuyst L. Lactic acid bacteria as functional starter cultures for the food fermentation industry. Trends Food. Sci. Technol. 2004;15:67–78. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2003.09.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.De Vuyst L, Vancanneyt M. Biodiversity and identification of sourdough lactic acid bacteria. Food Microbiol. 2007;24:120–127. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2006.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.M. Sellamani, N.K. Kalagatur, C. Siddaiah, V. Mudili, K. Krishna, G. Natarajan, V.L. Rao Putcha, Antifungal and zearalenone inhibitory activity of Pediococcus pentosaceus isolated from dairy products on Fusarium graminearum. Front. Microbiol. 7: 890–902, 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00890(2016) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 10.Deegan LH, Cotter PD, Hill C, Ross P. Bacteriocins: Biological tools for bio-preservation and shelf life extension. Int. Dairy J. 2006;16:1058–1071. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2005.10.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Maragkoudakis PA, Mountzouris KC, Psyrras D, Cremonese S, Fischer J, Cantor MD, Tsakalidou E. Functional properties of novel protective lactic acid bacteria and application in raw chicken meat against Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella enteritidis. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009;130:219–226. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.01.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fan L, Song J. Antimicrobial microbes-bacteriocin producing lactic acid bacteria. In: Méndez-Vilas A, editor. Microbial Pathogens and Strategies for Combating Them: Science. Badajoz: Technology and Education. Formatex Research Center; 2013. pp. 899–909. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Holzapfel, W. H., & Wood, B. J. B. (Ed.). Lactic acid bacteria: biodiversity and taxonomy. John Wiley & Sons, 2014. 10.1002/9781118655252.
  • 14.Zhang H, Cai Y, editors. Lactic acid bacteria: fundamentals and practice. Netherlands: Springer; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gálvez A, Abriouel H, Benomar N, Lucas R. Microbial antagonists to food-borne pathogens and biocontrol. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2010;21:142–148. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2010.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lynn TV, Hancock DD, Besser JH, Harrison JH, Rice DH, Stewart NT, Rowan LL. The occurrence and replication of Escherichia coli in cattle feeds. J. Dairy Sci. 1998;81:1102–1108. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75672-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pedroso AF, Adesogan AT, Queiroz OCM, Williams S. Control of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in corn silage with or without inoculants: efficssacy and mode of action. J. Dairy Sci. 2010;93:1098–1104. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Queiroz OCM, Ogunade IM, Weinberg Z, Adesogans AT. Silage review: foodborne pathogens in silage and their mitigation by silage additives. J. Dairy Sci. 2017;101:4132–4142. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gálvez A, Abriouel H, López R, Omar N. Bacteriocin-based strategies for food biopreservation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007;120:51–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cortesi ML, Panebianco A, Giuffrida A, Anastasio A. Innovations in seafood preservation and storage. Vet. Res. Comm. 2009;1:S15–S23. doi: 10.1007/s11259-009-9241-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.A. Campos, P. Castro, S.P. Aubourg, J.B. Velázquez, Use of natural preservatives in seafood. In: Novel Technologies in Food Science, Integrating Food Science and Engineering Knowledge into the Food Chain (eds McElhatton, A., Sobral, P.J.A. eds.), 325–360 (Springer, New York, 2012).
  • 22.Settanni L, Corsetti A. Application of bacteriocins in vegetable food biopreservation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008;121:123–138. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tagg JR, Dajani AS, Wannamaker LW. Bacteriocins of Gram-positive bacteria. Bacteriol. Rev. 1976;40:722–756. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.40.3.722-756.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jack RW, Tagg JR, Ray B. Bacteriocins of Gram-positive bacteria. Microbiol. Rev. 1995;59:171–200. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.59.2.171-200.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Allison GE, Klaenhammer TR. Phage resistance mechanism in lactic acid bacteria. Int. Dairy J. 1998;8:207–226. doi: 10.1016/S0958-6946(98)00043-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Oscáriz JC, Lasa I, Pisabarro AG. Detection and characterization of cerein 7, a new bacteriocin produced by Bacillus cereus with broad spectrum of activity. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1999;178:337–341. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb08696.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cleveland J, Montville TJ, Nes IF, Chikindas ML. Bacteriocins: safe, natural antimicrobials for food preservation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2001;71:1–20. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(01)00560-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Papagianni M. Ribosomally synthesized peptides with antimicrobial properties: biosynthesis, structure, function, and applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 2003;21:465–499. doi: 10.1016/S0734-9750(03)00077-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.L. Saavedra, P. Castellano, F. Sesma, Purification of bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria. In Public Health Microbiology: Methods in Molecular Biology (eds Spencer, J.F., & Spencer, A.L.R.) 331–336 (Springer, New York, 2004). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 30.De Martinis ECP, Alves VF, Franco BDGM. Fundamentals and perspectives for the use of bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria in meat products. Food Rev. Int. 2002;18:191–208. doi: 10.1081/FRI-120014688. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.D. Schulz, R.R. Bonelli, C.R.V. Batista, Bacteriocinas e enzimas produzidas por Bacillus spp. para conservação e processamento de alimentos. Alim. Nutr. (Araraquara)16, 403–411 (2005).
  • 32.Cotter PD, Hill C, Ross RP. Bacteriocins: developing innate immunity for food. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2005;3:777–788. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Delves-Broughton J. Nisin as a food preservative. Food Australia. 2005;57:525–527. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Samelis J, Georgiadou KG. The microbial association of Greek taverna sausage stored at 4 and 10 degrees C in air, vacuum or 100% carbon dioxide, and its spoilage potential. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2000;88:58–68. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.00936.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Turcotte C, Lacroix C, Kheard E, Grignon L, Fliss I. A rapid turbidometric microplate bioassays for accurate quantification of lactic acid bacteriocins. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004;90:283–293. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(03)00315-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bharti V, Mehta A, Singh S, Jain N, Ahirwal L, Mehta S. Bacteriocin: a novel approach for preservation of food. Int J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2015;7:20–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Papagianni M, Anastasiadou S. The bacteriocins of Pediococci Sources, production, properties and applications. Microb. Cell Fact. 2009;8:e3. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-8-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.W.J. Simpson, H. Taguchi, The genus Pediococcus, with notes on the genera Tetragenococcus and Aerociccis. In The Genera of Lactic Acid Bacteria (eds Wood, B.J.B., & Holzapfel, W.H.) 25–172 (Blackie Academic and Professional, London, 1995).
  • 39.N. Hwanhlem, V. Biscola, S. El-Ghaish, E. Jaffrès, X. Dousset, T. Haertlé, A. H-Kittikun, J.M. Chobert, Bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria isolated from mangrove forests in Southern Thailand as potential bio-control agents: purification and characterization of bacteriocin produced by Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis KT2W2L. Prob. Antimicrob. Prot. 5, 264–278 (2013). 10.1007/s12602-013-9150-2. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 40.Coad BR, Kidd SE, Ellis DH, Griesser HJ. Biomaterials surfaces capable of resisting fungal attachment and biofilm formation. Biotechnol. Adv. 2014;32:296–307. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.A.V.I. Bueno, C.C. Jobim, J.L.P. Daniel, M. Gierus, The use of quebracho condensed tannins as additive for rehydrated corn grain silage: effects on fermentation pattern and aerobic stability. In Silage Technology and Management, XVIII International Silage Conference, 24–26 July, Bonn, Germany, 2018, pp. 548–549.
  • 42.International Organization for Standardization (ISO 21527–2:2008), Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs—horizontal method for the enumeration of yeasts and moulds—Part 2: colony count technique in products with water activity less than or equal to 0.95.
  • 43.Vera ECS, Azevedo POS, Domínguez JM, Oliveira RPS. Optimization of biosurfactant and bacteriocin-like inhibitory substance (BLIS) production by Lactococcus lactis CETC-4434 from agroindustrial waste. Biochem. Eng. J. 2018;133:168–178. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2018.02.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.D. Sharma, B.S. Saharan, N. Chauhan, A. Bansal, S. Procha, Production structural characterization of Lactobacillus helveticus derived biosurfactant. Sci. World J. (2014) 1. 10.1155/2014/493548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 45.D. Sharma, B.S. Saharan, N. Chauhan, A. Bansal, S. Procha, Production and structural characterization of Lactobacillus helveticus derived biosurfactant. Sci. World J. e9 (2014). 10.1155/2014/493548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 46.Gautam N, Sharma N, Ahlawat OP. Purification and characterization of bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus brevis UM from Dhulliachar: a traditional food product of North East India. Indian J. Microbiol. 2014;54:185–189. doi: 10.1007/s12088-013-0427-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.T.E. D’Avola, K. Ogawa, M.R.M. Alves e Silva, A.A. Motoyama, E. Inácio, B. König Junior, I.-S. Watanabe. Three-dimensional characteristics of submandibular salivary gland of ageing rats: an HRSEM study. Ann. Anat.,188(5), 431–438 (2006). 10.1016/j.aanat.2006.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 48.Bahuguna A, Khan I, Bajpai VK, Kang SC. MTT assay to evaluate the cytotoxic potential of a drug. Bangladesh J Pharmacol. 2017;12:115–118. doi: 10.3329/bjp.v12i2.30892. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Moll GN, Konings WN, Driessen AJ. Bacteriocins: mechanism of membrane insertion and pore formation. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1999;76:185–198. doi: 10.1023/A:1002002718501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Martínez B, Rodríguez A, Suárez E. Antimicrobial peptides produced by bacteria: The Bacteriocins. In: Villa TG, Vinas M, editors. New Weapons to Control Bacterial Growth. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. pp. 15–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.L-J. Yin, C.W. Wu, Chien-Wei, S.T. Jiang, Bacteriocins from Pediococcus pentosaceus L and S from pork meat. J. Agric. Food Chem.51 (2003) 1071–1076. 10.1021/jf025838f. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 52.Spelhaug SR, Harlander SK. Inhibition of foodborne bacterial pathogens by bacteriocins from Lactobacillus lactis and Pediococcus pentosaceus. J. Food Prot. 1989;52:856–862. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-52.12.856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Okereke A, Montville TJ. Bacteriocin-mediated inhibition of Clostridium botulinum spores by lactic acid bacteria at refrigeration abuse temperatures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1991;57:3423–3428. doi: 10.1128/AEM.57.12.3423-3428.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Schillinger U, Lucke FK. Antibacterial activity of Lactobacillus sake isolated from meat. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1989;55:1901–1906. doi: 10.1128/AEM.55.8.1901-1906.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sjörgren J, Magnusson J, Broberg A, Schnürer J, Kene L. Antifungal 3-hydroxyl fatty acids from Lactobacillus plantarum MiLAB14. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003;69:7554–7557. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.12.7554-7557.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ström K, Sjörgren J, Broberg A, Schnürer J. Lactobacillus plantarum MiLAB 393 produces the antifungal cyclic dipeptides cyclo (L-PHE-L-Pro) and cyclo (L-Phe-trans-4-OH-L-Pro) and 3-phenyllactic acid. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002;68:4322–4327. doi: 10.1128/aem.68.9.4322-4327.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Magnusson JM, Ström K, Roos S, Sjögren J, Schnürer J. Broad and complex antifungal activity among environmental isolates of lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2003;219:129–135. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1097(02)01207-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lavermicocca P, Valerio F, Evidence A, Lazzaroni S, Corsetti A, Gobetti M. Purification and characterization of novel antifungal compounds from sourdough Lactobacillus plantarum strain 21 B. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000;66:4084–4090. doi: 10.1128/aem.66.9.4084-4090.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Cabo ML, Braber AF, Koenraad PMFJ. Apparent antifungal activity of several lactic acid bacteria against Penicillium discolor is due to acetic acid in the medium. J. Food Prot. 2002;65:1309–1316. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-65.8.1309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lavermicocca P, Valerio F, Visconti A. Antifungal activity of phenyl-lactic acid against molds isolated from bakery products. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003;69:634–640. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.1.634-640.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Corsetti A, Settanni L, van Sinderen D. Characterization of bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances (BLIS) from sourdough lactic acid bacteria and evaluation of their in vitro and in situ activity. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2004;96:521–534. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02171.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Fazeli MR, Shahverdi AR, Sedaghat B, Jamalifar H, Samadi N. Sourdough-isolated Lactobacillus fermentum as a potent anti-mould preservative of traditional Iranian bread. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2004;218:554–556. doi: 10.1007/s00217-004-0898-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Schnürer J, Magnusson J. Antifungal lactic acid bacteria as biopreservatives. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2005;16:70–78. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2004.02.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Dalie DKD, Deschamps AM, Richard-Forget F. Lactic acid bacteria—potential for control of mould growth and mycotoxins: a review. Food Control. 2010;21:370–380. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.07.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Dalie DKD, Deschamps AM, Atanasova-Penichon V, Richard-Forget F. Potential of Pediococcus pentosaceus (L006) isolated from maize leaf to suppress fumonisin-producing fungal growth. J. Food Prot. 2010;73:1129–1137. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-73.6.1129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Gerez CL, Torino MI, Rollan G, Font de Valdez G. Prevention of bread mould spoilage by using lactic acid bacteria with antifungal properties. Food Control. 2009;20:144–148. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2008.03.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Sadeghi A, Raeisi M, Ebrahimi M, Sadeghi B. Antifungal activity of Pediococcus pentosaceus isolated from whole barley sourdough. J. Food Qual. Hazards Control. 2016;3:30–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Holzer ME, Mayrhuber H, Danner H, Braun R. The role of Lactobacillus buchneri in forage preservation. Trends Biotechnol. 2003;21:282–287. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7799(03)00106-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Amado IR, Fuciños C, Fajardo P, Pastrana L. Pediocin SA-1: a selective bacteriocin for controlling Listeria monocytogenes in maize silages. J. Dairy Sci. 2016;99:8070–8080. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Miller JD. Mycological investigations of indoor environments. In: Flannigan B, Samson RA, Miller JD, editors. Microorganisms in Home and Indoor Work Environments: Diversity Health Impacts Investigation and Control. New York: Taylor and Francis; 2001. pp. 231–246. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Alonso VA, Pereyra CM, Keller LAM, Dalcero AM, Rosa CAR, Chiacchiera SM, Cavaglieri LR. Fungi and mycotoxin in silage: an overview. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2013;115:637–643. doi: 10.1111/jam.12178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.O’Brien M, Egan D, O’Kiely P, Forristal PD, Doohan FM, Fuller HT. Morphological and molecular characterization of P. roqueforti and P. paneum isolated from baled grass silage. Mycol. Res. 2008;112:921–932. doi: 10.1016/j.mycres.2008.01.023sss. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Rouse S, Harnett D, Vaughan A, van Sinderen D. Lactic acid bacteria with potential to eliminate fungal spoilage in foods. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2008;104:915–923. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03619.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Mandal V, Sen SK, Mandal NC. Detection, isolation and partial characterization of antifungal compound(s) produced by Pediococcus acidilactici LAB 5. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2007;2:671–674. doi: 10.1177/1934578X0700200610. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Zdemir, G.B., & Biyik, H.H. Isolation and characterization of a bacteriocin-like-substance produced by Geobacillus toebii strain HBB-247. Indian J. Microbiol. 52, 104–108 (2012). 10.1007/s12088-011-0227-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 76.Amso Z, Bisset SW, Yang SH, Harris PWR, Wrigh TH, Navo CD, Patchett ML, Norris GE, Brimble MA. Total chemical synthesis of glycocin F and analogues: S-Glycosylation confers improved antimicrobial activity. Chem. Sci. 2018;9:1686–1691. doi: 10.1039/C7SC04383J. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Bizani, D., & Brandelli A. Characterization of a bacteriocin produced by a newly isolated Bacillus sp. strain 8A. J. Appl. Microbiol. 93, 512–519 (2002). 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01720.x [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 78.Cladera-Oliveira F, Caron GR, Brandelli A. Bacteriocin-like substance production by Bacillus licheniformis strain P40. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2004;38:251–256. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2004.01478.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Riosen PA, Ronning P, Hegna IK, Kolsto AB. Characterization of a broad range antimicrobial substance from Bacillus cereus. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2005;96:648–655. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.02139.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Upreti GC, Hinsdill RD. Production and mode of action of lactocin 27: bacteriocin from a homofermentative Lactobacillus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1975;7:139–145. doi: 10.1128/aac.7.2.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Lewus CB, Sun S, Montville TJ. Production of an amylase-sensitive bacteriocin by an atypical Leuconostoc paramesenteroides strain. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1992;58:143–149. doi: 10.1128/AEM.58.1.143-149.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Jimenez-Diaz R, Rios-Sanchez RM, Desmazeaud M, Ruiz-Barba JL, Piard JC. Plantaricins S and T, two new bacteriocins produced by Lactobacillus plantarum LPCO10 isolated from a green olive fermentation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1993;59:1416–1424. doi: 10.1128/AEM.59.5.1416-1424.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Schbed F, Lalazar A, Henis Y, Juven BJ. Purification, partial characterization and plasmid linkage of pediocin SJ-1, a bacteriocin produced by Pediococcus acidilactici. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1993;74:67–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1993.tb02998.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Klaenhammer TR. Genetics of bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 1993;12:39–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1993.tb00012.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Di W, Zhang L, Wang S, Yi H, Han R, Fan R, Zhang Y. Physicochemical characterization and antitumor activity of exopolysaccharides produced by Lactobacillus casei SB27 from yak milk. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017;171:307–315. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Üngördü A, Sayin K. Quantum chemical calculations on sparfloxacin and boron complexes. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2019;733:136677. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2019.136677. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Chai, H., Allen, W.E., & Hicks, R.P. Synthetic antimicrobial peptides exhibit two different binding mechanisms to the lipopolysaccharides isolated from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumonia. Int. J. Med. Chem. 2014, e809283. 10.1155/2014/809283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 88.Ayyash, M., Abu-Jdayil, B., Olaimat, A., Esposito, G., Itsaranuwat, P., Osaili, T., Obaid, R., Kizhakkayil, J., & Shao-Quan, L. Physicochemical, bioactive and rheological properties of an exopolysaccharide produced by a probiotic Pediococcus pentosaceus M41. Carbohydr Polym229, 115462 (2020). 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115462. [DOI] [PubMed]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES