Abstract
Several months into the ongoing novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, this work provides a simple and direct projection of the outbreak spreading potential and the pandemic cessation dates in Chinese mainland, Iran, the Philippines and Chinese Taiwan, using the generalized logistic model (GLM). The short-term predicted number of cumulative COVID-19 cases matched the confirmed reports of those who were infected across the four countries and regions, and the long-term forecasts were capable to accurately evaluate the spread of the pandemic in Chinese mainland and Chinese Taiwan, where control measures such as social distancing were fully implemented and sustained, suggesting GLM as a valuable tool for characterizing the transmission dynamics process and the trajectory of COVID-19 pandemic along with the impact of interventions.
Keywords: COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Forecasting, Generalized logistic model, Richards model, Epidemic modeling
Introduction
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was identified in Chinese mainland, in November 2019, declared to be a public health emergency of international concern in two months, and recognized as a pandemic on 11th March 2020. As of 1st July 2020, approximately 10.8 million cases of COVID-19 have been reported in 213 countries and territories, resulting in approximately 520,000 deaths. Emerging infectious diseases (EID), which appear in a population for the first time, or that may have existed previously but is rapidly spreading, are possibly the deadliest and continue to challenge human health.
As the world races to find a vaccine or a treatment to combat the pandemic, many concerns arise about the outbreak severity, particularly the potential number of infected people. Hence, it is of a great importance to estimate the outbreak evolution using epidemiology models. Here, the epidemiological dataset of confirmed cases with COVID-19 in Chinese mainland, Iran, the Philippines and Chinese Taiwan was analyzed, using the generalized logistic model (GLM), also known as Richards’ model. This empirical function has made many remarkable coincidences with real SARS, Zika and Ebola epidemic data for real-time prediction of outbreak development (Chowell et al., 2017; Heisey, 2004; Smirnova et al., 2016; Zhou & Yan, 2003). Early assessment of the severity of infection and transmissibility can help quantify COVID-19 pandemic potential and anticipate the likely number of infected people by the end of the epidemics.
Data and methods
Specific countries/regions were selected as denoting different COVID-19 incidence scales. Chinese mainland and Iran, the two major centers of COVID-19 outbreak in eastern and southern Asia, respectively with tens of thousands of cases; the Philippines, a representative of an archipelagic country with thousands of cases, and Chinese Taiwan, with only hundreds of cases. For each country/region, the officially reported data on COVID-19 daily cases from the onset of the outbreak to July 1st, 2020 were collected from governmental or health authorities’ websites (Appendix Table 1 Fig. 1A–D). To allow outbreak projection, the data from the early phase of the outbreak (35–40 days) were fitted with the GLM, an extension of the standard logistic or sigmoid functions, as described previously (Richards, 2009; Zhou & Yan, 2003). The originally logistic model was developed by Verhulst in 1838 for biological populations growth modelling (Verhulst, 1838). Half a century ago, an extension of this classic logistic model, allowing for more flexible curvature of the S shape where the growth curve is asymmetrical, was introduced, establishing the Richards curve or generalized logistic model (Richards, 1959). This approach was chosen for its simplicity, minimal number of parameters, and for its ability to capture the true extent of the prevalence of the pandemic. Inspired from population biology, this model assumes an initial exponential growth phase that saturates as the number of cases accumulates owing to sustained control interventions and newly-adopted human behaviors. It enables the evaluation of the cumulative number of COVID-19 cases, represented by Y(t). The dynamics of Y, in period t, can be expressed as:
Where K is the upper asymptote, or the maximum cumulative case incidence and r is the intrinsic growth rate during the exponential phase. tm is the turning point, the time where maximum number of cases per day occur, is estimated as . The exponent α measures the deviation from the symmetric classic logistic curve. α = 1 illustrates a symmetric distribution centered at tm; α > 1 or α < 1 indicates that Y(t) grow faster or slower, respectively, than predicted by the model. Not a single new COVID-19 case emerging within 3 consecutive months defines the end of the epidemic (Zhou & Yan, 2003). The basic reproduction number of COVID-19, R0, the expected number of secondary cases produced by a single infection was estimated as , where T is the mean serial interval; the time that elapses between onset of symptoms in the primary case and onset of symptoms of the secondary case.
Parameter estimates for this dynamical system are typically subject to sources of uncertainty arising from noise in the data. In order to estimate the uncertainty of our model estimates and construct the 95% confidence intervals, we used a parametric bootstrap approach to randomly generate multiple samples from the best-fit curve of the empirical distribution of the parameters. For each of the four localities data sets, 800 bootstrap iterations were computed.
The model should conform to several assumptions: first, as the number of tests conducted affects the reported number of daily cases, similar number of individuals are tested daily. Secondly, cases are not imported from outside the country/region. Thirdly, the model does not consider human behavior and is conditional on the assumption that public gatherings are highly limited, allowing the epidemic to follow its natural course. Likewise, implementation of intervention measures, such as enhanced hygiene, isolation, contact tracing, restrictions on social contacts and migration by air or train, are maintained continuously.
Results and discussion
Corresponding to the basic premise of GLM, as of April 10th, the cumulative COVID-19 cases curve of each country/region consists of a single peak of high incidence, resulting in a sigmoid curve with a single turning point (Fig. 1E–H). For all localities, high correlations between observed and predicted incidence were found (R2 > 0.99, p value < 2.2e−16).
To evaluate the forecasting performance of the model, the total number of cases on April 10th were estimated based on the observed incidence during the initial stage of the pandemic. A subset data of 35 days was used for Chinese mainland (January 21st to February 24th, 2020), Iran (February 26th to March 31st, 2020) and the Philippines (February 19th to March 24th, 2020). In Chinese Taiwan, due to a smaller scale of cases, dataset of 40 days (February 25th to April 4th, 2020) was required for optimal fit to the model. Forecasting the total number of cases on April 10th, 2020, was done 46, 10, 17 and 6 consecutive days ahead for Chinese mainland, Iran, the Philippines and Chinese Taiwan, respectively. In all cases, the predicted cumulative number of cases was similar to the one officially reported (Fig. 1E–H, Table 1). The predicted number was 81796 for Chinese mainland, 68225 for Iran, 4430 for the Philippines and 425 for Chinese Taiwan, while the observed total number of cases was 81953, 68192, 4195 and 382, respectively [see Table for 95% confidence interval (CI)]. The maximum predicted cumulative incidence, K, was estimated to be 81871 for Chinese mainland, 105547 for Iran, 6367 for the Philippines, and 483 for Chinese Taiwan. The estimated exponential daily growth rate (r) of COVID-19 was 22% in Chinese mainland, 10% in Iran, 18% in the Philippines, and 14% in Chinese Taiwan. These rates suggest that the cumulative number of infected people will double every 4.5, 10, 5 and 7 days in Chinese mainland, Iran, the Philippines and Chinese Taiwan, respectively, if control interventions to contain the pandemic are not implemented. In all countries/regions, the estimated asymmetric parameter α was close to 1, indicating that the differences in COVID-19 cases before and after tm will be distributed similarly.
Table 1.
Parameter | Chinese mainland | Iran | The Philippines | Chinese Taiwan |
---|---|---|---|---|
R2a | 0.997 | 0.995 | 0.995 | 0.99 |
α[95% CIb] | 0.99 [0.97, 1.02] | 1 [0.8, 1.6] | 0.99 [0.35, 1.63] | 0.98 [0.88, 1.13] |
r[95% CIb] | 0.22 [0.21, 0.23] | 0.1 [0.09, 0.11] | 0.19 [0.18, 0.2] | 0.14 [0.13, 0.15] |
R0[95% CIb] | 3.59 [3.39, 3.79] | 1.86 [1.83, 1.89] | 3 [2.8, 3.2] | 2.26 [1.86, 2.66] |
April 10thprojected No. of cases [95% CIb] | 81796.55 [81796.53, 81796.57] | 68225 [65971, 70382] | 4430 [4172, 4669] | 425 [418, 431] |
April 10thobserved No. of cases | 81953 | 68192 | 4195 | 382 |
tmprojected [95% CIb] | 19.4 [19.14, 19.66] | 37.8 [33.9, 41.7] | 44.7 [39.9, 49.5] | 31.3 [29.86, 32.74] |
tmobserved | Day 23 (February 12th) | Day 34 (March 30th) | Day 42 (March 31st) | Day 23 (March 20th) |
Maximum No. of cases [95% CIb] | 81871 [80520, 83222] | 105547 [69451, 141643] | 6367 [0, 22374] | 483 [441, 525] |
Pandemic cessation day number and date [95% CIb] | 102 [72, 127] May 1st [April 1st, May 26th] | 213 [147, 252] September 25th [July 21st, December 3rd] | 131 [119, 157] June 28th [June 16th, July 24th] | 129 [80, 181] July 2nd [May 14th, August 23rd] |
July 1stobserved No. of cases | 83534 | 230211 | 38511 | 447 |
α, the deviation from the symmetric classic logistic curve; r, the intrinsic growth rate during the exponential phase; R0, the basic reproduction number; tm, the turning point of the model, the date in the brackets indicates the actual day where the maximum number of cases has occurred.
Pearson’s correlation goodness-of-fit of the model, p value < 2.2e−16.
CI, confidence interval.
According to the model, the earliest time for the current COVID-19 pandemic to cease, was evaluated to occur after 102 days (May 1st) in Chinese mainland, 213 days (September 25th) in Iran, 131 days (June 28th) in the Philippines, and 129 days (July 2nd) in Chinese Taiwan. A mean serial interval of 5.8 days (He et al., 2020) was used to calculate R0, the basic reproduction number of COVID-19 infections. R0 estimates were 3.59, 1.86, 3 and 2.26 in Chinese mainland, Iran, the Philippines and Chinese Taiwan, respectively, similar to those published previously (Zhao et al., 2020) and to that of SARS (Liu et al., 2020). These early stages R0 are likely to decrease with control measurements policies continuation. Indeed, predicting COVID-19 dynamics based on its initial growth phase, revealed that the turning point of each country has occurred closer to the lower limit of the 95% CI and even earlier than expected, due to the control measurements effectiveness. The turning point was estimated as day 19.4 [19.14, 19.66] in Chinese mainland, 37.8 [33.9, 41.7] in Iran, 44.7 [39.9, 49.5] in the Philippines and 31.3 [29.86, 32.74] in Chinese Taiwan, whereas the observed highest number of daily cases in Chinese mainland (14108), Iran (3186), the Philippines (538) and Chinese Taiwan (27), as of April 10th, has occurred on day 23, 34, 42, and 23, respectively (Table 1).
Forecasting COVID-19 pandemic is challenging in the context of an outbreak caused by novel pathogen for which its natural history and modes of transmission are unknown. Since the GLM is trained on the existing data and is designed to fit the development of epidemic curves, rather than EID estimation only, it could provide a good fit to the limited available COVID-19 epidemiological data to characterize the transmission dynamics process and the trajectory of COVID-19 pandemic along with the impact of interventions (Wang et al., 2012). The primary goal of this prediction, made on 10th April 2020, during the height of the public panic and uncertainty, is to evaluate when the pandemic might be brought under control based on its initial growth phase and is conditional to intervention measures continuation. Changes of the current policies or human behavior may affect the actual contact rate and the subsequent development of the epidemic. Additionally, testing kits deficiency can lead to poor diagnosis and incomplete data, which may implicate the model robustness. As of 1st July 2020, almost three months after this prediction, the officially reported number of cumulative cases was 83534 for Chinese mainland, 230211 for Iran, 38511 for the Philippines, and 447 for Chinese Taiwan. While the short-term predictions matched the reports of the total infected people across the four countries/regions, the long-term maximum predicted number of cumulative COVID-19 cases matched the confirmed reports of those who were infected only in Chinese mainland and Chinese Taiwan.
Exploring the governmental policies dynamics in Iran and the Philippines suggests that substantial changes in policies and human behavior have influenced the model robustness. One major change in the Philippines, is the total number of overseas Filipino workers (OFWs) that have returned to the country during the pandemic. During February and March, approximately 850–980 land-based and seafarers from cruise ships Filipino workers have returned to the Philippines. In April alone, more than 17250 Filipinos repatriates were reported by the department of health Philippines (DOH) and the department of foreign affairs (DPA), almost 18-fold change, compared with the number of Filipino repatriates during the previous months of the pandemic, on which this prediction is based on. The increased number of OFWs and the growing probably of COVID-19 infected people among them controvert one of the crucial assumptions of the model which states that new cases are not imported from abroad, due to the model inability to assess imported cases of COVID-19 and their onwards transmission. Furthermore, significant differences in COVID-19 testing rates were observed in the Philippines, contrasting the model assumption that the testing policy is somewhat consistent over time. Up to April 19th, DOH reported that it had performed a total of approximately 53000 individual tests for COVID-19. On May 2nd, additional 3000 tests per day were added, and two days later DOH reported that the testing capacity of laboratories for COVID-19 in the country had reached the 5000-mark, recording 5264 tests per day. Starting May 15th, the country can accommodate up to 9200 tests daily. Whereas a total of 53000 tests for COVID-19 were performed during the first months of the pandemic, starting mid-May, a similar number of tests were performed in just 5–6 days, leading to considerable increase in the number of detected COVID-19 cases in the Philippines.
Iran also has seen a rapid surge in the numbers of COVID-19 cases in recent weeks. In Iran, during the initial outbreak, the highest daily the number of reported cases (tm) reached a high of 3186 on March 30th, when it became one of the worst affected countries outside Chinese mainland. In mid-April, as the number of reported cases decreased to approximately 1000 a day, and since it cannot economically afford to continue restrictions, Iran began to ease its restrictions: shopping malls, bazaars, public parks and recreation areas reopened and travel resumed between different provinces. In May, the government allowed restaurants, cafes, museums, historical sites, all mosques and major shia religious shrines to reopen. Our forecast assumes that existing control measures and levels of social distancing will remain in place during the prediction period, but here, with the considerable easing of restrictions, there was a clearly increased social interaction and the daily the number of reported cases reached a second high of 3574 on June 4th.
Taken together, the study demonstrates that governmental policies and human behavior would have a great effect on containing SARS-CoV-2 and on forward trajectories of COVID-19 with accuracy. The retrospective analysis of SARS-CoV-2 dynamics in Chinese mainland, Iran, the Philippines and Chinese Taiwan, using limited data in the early period of the pandemic found that the GLM has proved useful to generate short-term and long-term forecasts of the trajectory of the pandemic in countries/regions representing a range of COVID-19 incidence scales. The model highlights the significance of fully implemented and continued social distancing measures in containing the virus. Moreover, implementing social distancing policies at an early stage, to reduce the reproduction number (R0) of the virus, will provide more time for the adaptation of health care systems to the current pandemic and for the development of medicinal solutions. The model also demonstrates that substantial relaxation of the early stage policies in the lack of medicinal and pharmaceutical interventions will probably result in pandemic reemergence. Even though this prediction is conditional to intervention measures continuation, forecasting epidemic size and peak time may help clarify what the future holds, and could be useful to make long-term strategic decisions regarding the distribution of testing and treatment facilities that may be required, and may be helpful to assess the extent of protective and medical equipment needed for the near future.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Adelis Foundation, Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust, Jeanne and Joseph Nissim Foundation for Life Sciences, Tom and Sondra Rykoff Family Foundation Research and the Raymond Burton Plant Genome Research Fund for supporting the AA lab activity. A.A. is the incumbent of the Peter J. Cohn Professorial Chair. The authors report no funding related to this research.
Handling editor: Dr Y. Shao
Footnotes
Peer review under responsibility of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
Appendix.
Appendix Table 1.
Date (yyyy-mm-dd) | Chinese mainland | Iran | The Philippines | Chinese Taiwan |
---|---|---|---|---|
2020-21-01 | 440 | |||
2020-22-01 | 131 | |||
2020-23-01 | 259 | |||
2020-24-01 | 457 | |||
2020-25-01 | 688 | |||
2020-26-01 | 769 | |||
2020-27-01 | 1771 | |||
2020-28-01 | 1459 | |||
2020-29-01 | 1737 | |||
2020-30-01 | 1981 | |||
2020-31-01 | 2099 | |||
2020-01-02 | 2589 | |||
2020-02-02 | 2825 | |||
2020-03-02 | 3235 | |||
2020-04-02 | 3884 | |||
2020-05-02 | 3694 | |||
2020-06-02 | 3143 | |||
2020-07-02 | 3385 | |||
2020-08-02 | 2652 | |||
2020-09-02 | 2973 | |||
2020-10-02 | 2467 | |||
2020-11-02 | 2015 | |||
2020-12-02 | 14108 | |||
2020-13-02 | 5090 | |||
2020-14-02 | 2641 | |||
2020-15-02 | 2008 | 3 | 18 | |
2020-16-02 | 2048 | 2 | ||
2020-17-02 | 1888 | 2 | ||
2020-18-02 | 1749 | |||
2020-19-02 | 382 | 2 | 1 | |
2020-20-02 | 898 | 3 | 1 | |
2020-21-02 | 823 | 13 | 2 | |
2020-22-02 | 648 | 11 | ||
2020-23-02 | 214 | 14 | 2 | |
2020-24-02 | 508 | 18 | 2 | |
2020-25-02 | 406 | 34 | 1 | |
2020-26-02 | 433 | 44 | 1 | |
2020-27-02 | 327 | 106 | ||
2020-28-02 | 427 | 143 | 2 | |
2020-29-02 | 573 | 205 | 5 | |
2020-01-03 | 202 | 385 | 1 | |
2020-02-03 | 125 | 523 | 1 | |
2020-03-03 | 119 | 835 | 1 | |
2020-04-03 | 139 | 586 | ||
2020-05-03 | 143 | 591 | 2 | |
2020-06-03 | 99 | 1234 | 2 | 1 |
2020-07-03 | 44 | 1076 | 1 | |
2020-08-03 | 40 | 743 | 4 | |
2020-09-03 | 19 | 595 | 14 | |
2020-10-03 | 24 | 881 | 9 | 2 |
2020-11-03 | 15 | 958 | 16 | 1 |
2020-12-03 | 20 | 1075 | 3 | 1 |
2020-13-03 | 11 | 1289 | 12 | 1 |
2020-14-03 | 20 | 1365 | 47 | 3 |
2020-15-03 | 16 | 1209 | 29 | 6 |
2020-16-03 | 21 | 1053 | 2 | 8 |
2020-17-03 | 13 | 1178 | 45 | 10 |
2020-18-03 | 34 | 1192 | 15 | 23 |
2020-19-03 | 39 | 1046 | 15 | 8 |
2020-20-03 | 41 | 1237 | 13 | 27 |
2020-21-03 | 46 | 966 | 77 | 8 |
2020-22-03 | 39 | 1028 | 73 | 26 |
2020-23-03 | 78 | 1411 | 82 | 26 |
2020-24-03 | 47 | 1762 | 90 | 21 |
2020-25-03 | 67 | 2206 | 84 | 19 |
2020-26-03 | 55 | 2389 | 71 | 17 |
2020-27-03 | 54 | 2926 | 96 | 15 |
2020-28-03 | 45 | 3076 | 272 | 16 |
2020-29-03 | 0 | 2901 | 343 | 15 |
2020-30-03 | 79 | 3186 | 128 | 8 |
2020-31-03 | 36 | 3110 | 538 | 16 |
2020-01-04 | 35 | 2988 | 227 | 7 |
2020-02-04 | 31 | 2875 | 322 | 10 |
2020-03-04 | 19 | 2715 | 385 | 9 |
2020-04-04 | 30 | 2560 | 76 | 7 |
2020-05-04 | 39 | 2483 | 152 | 8 |
2020-06-04 | 32 | 2274 | 414 | 10 |
2020-07-04 | 62 | 2089 | 104 | 3 |
2020-08-04 | 63 | 1997 | 106 | 3 |
2020-09-04 | 42 | 1634 | 206 | 1 |
2020-10-04 | 46 | 1972 | 119 | 2 |
2020-11-04 | 99 | 1837 | 233 | 3 |
2020-12-04 | 108 | 1657 | 220 | 3 |
2020-13-04 | 89 | 1617 | 284 | 5 |
2020-14-04 | 46 | 1574 | 291 | |
2020-15-04 | 46 | 1512 | 230 | 2 |
2020-16-04 | 26 | 1606 | 207 | |
2020-17-04 | 325 | 1499 | 218 | |
2020-18-04 | 27 | 1374 | 209 | 3 |
2020-19-04 | 16 | 1343 | 172 | 22 |
2020-20-04 | 12 | 1294 | 200 | 2 |
2020-21-04 | 11 | 1297 | 140 | 3 |
2020-22-04 | 30 | 1194 | 114 | 1 |
2020-23-04 | 10 | 1030 | 271 | 1 |
2020-24-04 | 6 | 1168 | 211 | 1 |
2020-25-04 | 12 | 1134 | 102 | 1 |
2020-26-04 | 11 | 1153 | 285 | |
2020-27-04 | 3 | 991 | 198 | |
2020-28-04 | 6 | 1112 | 181 | |
2020-29-04 | 22 | 1073 | 254 | |
2020-30-04 | 4 | 983 | 276 | |
2020-01-05 | 12 | 1006 | 284 | |
2020-02-05 | 1 | 802 | 156 | 3 |
2020-03-05 | 2 | 976 | 295 | |
2020-04-05 | 3 | 1223 | 262 | 6 |
2020-05-05 | 1 | 1323 | 199 | |
2020-06-05 | 2 | 1680 | 320 | 1 |
2020-07-05 | 2 | 1485 | 339 | 1 |
2020-08-05 | 1 | 1556 | 120 | |
2020-09-05 | 1 | 1529 | 147 | |
2020-10-05 | 14 | 1383 | 184 | |
2020-11-05 | 17 | 1683 | 292 | |
2020-12-05 | 1 | 1481 | 264 | |
2020-13-05 | 7 | 1958 | 268 | |
2020-14-05 | 3 | 1808 | 258 | |
2020-15-05 | 4 | 2102 | 215 | |
2020-16-05 | 8 | 1757 | 214 | |
2020-17-05 | 6 | 1806 | 208 | |
2020-18-05 | 7 | 2294 | 205 | |
2020-19-05 | 6 | 2111 | 224 | |
2020-20-05 | 5 | 2346 | 279 | |
2020-21-05 | 2 | 2392 | 213 | 1 |
2020-22-05 | 4 | 2311 | 163 | |
2020-23-05 | 1869 | 180 | ||
2020-24-05 | 3 | 2180 | 258 | |
2020-25-05 | 11 | 2023 | 284 | |
2020-26-05 | 7 | 1787 | 350 | |
2020-27-05 | 1 | 2080 | 380 | |
2020-28-05 | 2 | 2258 | 539 | |
2020-29-05 | 2819 | 1046 | 1 | |
2020-30-05 | 4 | 2282 | 590 | |
2020-31-05 | 2 | 2516 | 862 | |
2020-01-06 | 16 | 2979 | 552 | 1 |
2020-02-06 | 4 | 3117 | 359 | |
2020-03-06 | 3134 | 751 | ||
2020-04-06 | 1 | 3574 | 634 | |
2020-05-06 | 5 | 2886 | 244 | |
2020-06-06 | 3 | 2269 | 714 | |
2020-07-06 | 6 | 2364 | 555 | |
2020-08-06 | 4 | 2043 | 579 | |
2020-09-06 | 3 | 2095 | 518 | |
2020-10-06 | 3 | 2011 | 740 | |
2020-11-06 | 11 | 2218 | 443 | |
2020-12-06 | 7 | 2389 | 612 | |
2020-13-06 | 11 | 1882 | 605 | |
2020-14-06 | 57 | 3000 | 538 | |
2020-15-06 | 49 | 2449 | 490 | 2 |
2020-16-06 | 40 | 2563 | 361 | |
2020-17-06 | 44 | 2612 | 457 | |
2020-18-06 | 28 | 2596 | 561 | 1 |
2020-19-06 | 32 | 2615 | 660 | |
2020-20-06 | 27 | 2322 | 941 | |
2020-21-06 | 26 | 2368 | 652 | |
2020-22-06 | 18 | 2573 | 630 | |
2020-23-06 | 22 | 2445 | 1143 | |
2020-24-06 | 12 | 2531 | 470 | |
2020-25-06 | 19 | 2595 | 774 | 1 |
2020-26-06 | 13 | 2628 | 1004 | |
2020-27-06 | 21 | 2456 | 730 | |
2020-28-06 | 17 | 2489 | 652 | |
2020-29-06 | 12 | 2536 | 983 | |
2020-30-06 | 19 | 2457 | 1076 | |
2020-01-07 | 3 | 2549 | 977 |
References
- Chowell G., Viboud C., Simonsen L., Merler S., Vespignani A. Perspectives on model forecasts of the 2014-2015 Ebola epidemic in West Africa: Lessons and the way forward. BMC Medicine. 2017;15(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0811-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heisey D.M. SARS epidemiology modeling. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2004;10(6):1165–1168. doi: 10.3201/eid1006.031023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- He X., Lau E.H.Y., Wu P., Deng X., Wang J., Hao X. Temporal dynamics in viral shedding and transmissibility of COVID-19. Nature Medicine. 2020;26(5):672–675. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0869-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Y., Gayle A.A., Wilder-Smith A., Rocklöv J. The reproductive number of COVID-19 is higher compared to SARS coronavirus. Journal of Travel Medicine. 2020;27(2):1–4. doi: 10.1093/jtm/taaa021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richards F.J. A flexible growth function for empirical use. Journal of Experimental Botany. 1959;10(2):290–301. [Google Scholar]
- Richards H.Y.-H. Model: A simple procedure for real-time prediction of outbreak severity. Modeling and Dynamics of Infectious Diseases. 2009:216–236. [Google Scholar]
- Smirnova A., Simonsen L., Viboud C. Using phenomenological models to characterize transmissibility and forecast patterns and final burden of Zika epidemics. PLoS Currents. 2016;8:1–9. doi: 10.1371/currents.outbreaks.f14b2217c902f453d9320a43a35b9583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Verhulst P. Notice sur la loi que la population pursuit dans son accroissement. Correspondance mathématique et physique. 1838;10:113–121. [Google Scholar]
- Wang X.S., Wu J., Yang Y. Richards model revisited: Validation by and application to infection dynamics. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2012;313:12–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.07.024. Available from: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao S., Lin Q., Ran J., Musa S.S., Yang G. Preliminary estimation of the basic reproduction number of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in China, from 2019 to 2020: A data-driven analysis in the early phase of the outbreak. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2020;92:214–217. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.01.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou G., Yan G. Severe acute respiratory syndrome epidemic in Asia. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2003;9(12):1608–1610. doi: 10.3201/eid0912.030382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]