Skip to main content
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 2020 Jul 24;29(8):1829–1835. doi: 10.1002/pro.3896

Structure of cytochrome b 5 unique to tardigrades

Yohta Fukuda 1, JeeEun Kim 1, Tsuyoshi Inoue 1,
PMCID: PMC7380671  PMID: 32483879

Abstract

Cytochrome b 5 is an essential electron transfer protein, which is ubiquitously found in living systems and involved in wide variety of biological processes. Tardigrades (also known as water bears), some of which are famous for desiccation resistance, have many proteins unique to them. Here, we report spectroscopic and structural characterization of a cytochrome b 5 like protein from one of the desiccation‐tolerant tardigrades, Ramazzottius varieornatus strain YOKOZUNA‐1 (RvCytb 5). A 1.4 Å resolution crystal structure revealed that RvCytb 5 is a new cytochrome b 5 protein specific to tardigrades.

Keywords: cytochrome b5, heme, tardigrade, X‐ray crystallography

Short abstract

PDB Code(s): 7BWH;

1. INTRODUCTION

Tardigrades are microscopic multicellular organisms found in almost all environments on Earth from roadside mosses to high mountains and deep sea. 1 Some terrestrial tardigrades can retain their lives under extremely desiccated conditions through transition into a state called anhydrobiosis, in which metabolic processes are undetectable. 2 , 3 In preparation for anhydrobiosis, the bodies of tardigrades gradually shrink to form a “tun.” The tun also shows tolerances to high (151°C) 4 or low (−273°C) 5 temperature, exposure to high energy radiations, 6 , 7 , 8 vacuum, 9 , 10 high pressure, 11 , 12 and toxic chemicals. 13 , 14 Moreover, anhydrobiotic tardigrades are known to survive even in space (low Earth orbit) for 10 days. 15 This extraordinary ability of tardigrades is so famous even in the public that tardigrades appeared in an American famous sci‐fi television series Star Trek and a Japanese magical girl animation series Pretty Cure. On the other hand, the detailed molecular basis of tardigrade anhydrobiosis has been largely ambiguous because their key components, tardigrade‐specific proteins, are poorly investigated at molecular and atomic levels. To understand structure–function relationships of tardigrade‐specific proteins, we have started studies on them with structural biology approaches. 16 , 17 , 18 In this study, we focus on an electron transfer protein, cytochrome b 5 (Cytb 5), from tardigrades. Electron transfer (ET) plays essential roles in biological processes including photosynthesis and respiration. Cytb 5 mediates many ET reactions relevant to lipid metabolism, 19 steroid synthesis, 20 and methemoglobin reduction. 21 Because Cytb 5 is involved in fundamental biological reactions, it is ubiquitously found in animals, plants, and fungi. Besides, amino acid sequences of Cytb 5 proteins are usually well‐conserved. The genome of one of the toughest tardigrades, Ramazzottius varieornatus strain YOKOZUNA‐1, has several structural genes of Cytb 5 proteins. 22 Judging from their amino acid sequences, most of them closely resemble well‐known Cytb 5 proteins; however, one cytochrome b 5 like (Cytb 5‐like) protein shows low amino acid sequence similarity to them. Here, we present structural and spectroscopic characterization of this unique Cytb 5‐like protein from R. varieornatus.

2. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The amino acid sequence of RvCytb 5 shows only 30~36% identity to typical Cytb 5 sequences. In contrast, it shows slightly higher similarity (39~46% identity) to that of a protein from a tardigrade Hypsibius exemplaris (HeCytb 5) and those of some eukaryotic proteins that are annotated as Cytb 5‐like proteins but not well characterized (Figure 1a). These Cytb 5‐like proteins are phylogenetically distinct from typical Cytb 5 proteins such as mammalian Cytb 5, structures and properties of which are extensively studied (Figure 1b). Cytb 5‐like proteins including RvCytb 5 do not have a C‐terminal transmembrane helix, which anchors the proteins on microsomal or mitochondrial membranes; therefore, they are soluble proteins. Tardigrade Cytb 5‐like proteins, RvCytb 5 and HeCytb 5, are distinguished from others by insertion of amino acid residues which we named tardigrade specific loop (TS loop) (Figure 1a). RvCytb 5 has a shorter TS loop than HeCytb 5. The TS loops contain Gly, Ser, and Pro residues, which tend to form a disordered region.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Cytochrome b 5 like protein from Ramazzottius varieornatus (RvCytb 5). (a) Amino acid sequence alignment of RvCytb 5 with similar eukaryotic Cytb 5‐like proteins and typical Cytb 5 proteins. Rv: Ramazzottius varieornatus; He: Hypsibius exemplaris (tardigrade); Tc: Tribolium castaneum (insect); Pd: Pocillopora damicornis (coral); Sp: Stylophora pistillata (coral); At: Aethina tumida (insect). Positions of ligand histidine residues are indicated by black circles. (b) Phylogenetic tree for Cytb 5 proteins estimated by a maximum likelihood method. The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa clustered together is shown next to the branches. (c) UV–visible spectra of oxidized (orange) and reduced (pink) RvCytb 5. Insets show closeup views for the spectra recorded with five times concentrated samples and sample solutions in 1.5 ml micro tubes

UV–visible absorption spectra were measured for RvCytb 5. The protein at its ferric (Fe3+) form showed a peak corresponding to a Soret band at 412 nm (Figure 1c). The peak corresponding to α and β bands were at 562 (shoulder peak) and 532 nm, respectively. The ferrous (Fe2+) form of RvCytb 5 exhibited Soret, α, and β band peaks at 422, 558, and 527 nm, respectively. Moreover, it had a weak peak at around 612 nm. These characteristics are similar to known cytochrome b 5, 23 and other bis‐histidinyl (i.e., hexacoordinated) globin proteins including neuroglobin 24 and cytoglobin. 25 The ratio of absorption at the β band to that at the trough between the α and β band (A558/A540) was 2.4 in the ferrous form, indicating a stable hexacoordination state. 26

The crystal structure was determined at a resolution of 1.4 Å by a single‐wavelength anomalous dispersion method using a heme iron atom (Fe‐SAD) (Table 1). The final R work and R free values are 0.147 and 0.171, respectively. The overall structure of RvCytb 5 is composed of five α helices and five β strands (Figure 2a), which is similar to known Cytb 5 structures such as human Cytb 5 27 and house fly Cytb 5 28 (Figure 2b). An obvious difference between RvCytb 5 and other typical Cytb 5 proteins is a presence of a TS loop between β3 and β4. Although the TS loop does not form any secondary structures, the residues on it form a hydrogen bond network with each other and a salt bridge between Asp36 and Arg45 (Figure 2c). The TS loop shows few interactions with surrounding residues outside the TS loop, implying that it can flexibly move independent of other parts of the protein. One interaction is a hydrogen bond formed by the carbonyl O atom of Ser42 and the side chain of Arg35. The second one is a guanidino group stacking between Arg45 and Arg92. Such kind of arginine ion pairing is reported in several proteins and is thought to stabilize protein structures. 29

TABLE 1.

Data collection and refinement statistics

Data collection
X‐ray source SPring‐8 BL44XU
Wavelength (Å) 0.9000
Space group P22121
Unit cell a, b, c (Å) 34.0, 37.5, 77.5
Mosaicity (°) 0.08
Resolution range (Å) 38.8–1.40 (1.42–1.40) a
Total no. of reflections/no. of unique reflections 127,971 (6,055)/20,165 (969)
Completeness (%) 99.7 (100)
Redundancy 6.3 (6.2)
I/σ(I)〉 24.0 (3.9)
R meas (all I+ and I−) 0.039 (0.493)
R meas (within I+/I−) 0.038 (0.266)
CC1/2 0.999 (0.871)
Overall B factor from Wilson plot (Å2) 15.5
Refinement
Resolution range (Å) 38.8–1.40 (1.436–1.400)
Completeness (%) 99.6 (99.9)
No. of reflections, working set 19,138 (1,397)
No. of reflections, test set 985 (69)
R work/R free 0.147/0.171 (0.186/0.204)
No. of non‐H atoms 1,017
Protein 791
Ion/ligand 131
Water 95
R.m.s. deviation bonds (Å), angles (°) 0.007, 1.350
Average B factors (Å2) 28.45
Protein 27.28
Ion/ligand 24.30
Water 43.95
Ramachandran favored/allowed/disallowed (%) 98.84/1.16/0
PDB code ID 7BWH
a

Values in parentheses refer to the highest resolution shell.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Structure of RvCytb 5. (a) Cartoon representation of the overall structure. Heme is illustrated by black sticks (carbon atoms) and a brown sphere (Fe atom). His ligands are colored by magenta. (b) Superposition of RvCytb 5 on human Cytb 5 (pale yellow: PDB code ID 3NER) and house fly Cytb 5 (pale green: PDB code ID 2IBJ). The TS loop is colored in green. (c) TS loop. Hydrogen bonds are shown by dotted yellow lines. A salt bridge is shown by orange double‐headed arrows. Arginine stacking is shown by a yellow double‐headed arrow. Distances are shown by Å unit. (d) Closeup view around the heme binding site with a sigma‐A‐weighted 2F oF c map (1 σ: blue meshes). Hydrogen bonds and coordination bonds are shown by dotted yellow and black lines, respectively. Distances are shown by Å unit (e) Electrostatic potential surface of RvCytb 5 (left) and its cross‐section view (right). The electrostatic potential is represented as a gradient from negative (red: −5 k B T/e c) to positive (blue: 5 k B T/e c) (f) Electrostatic potential surface of human Cytb 5. (g) Electrostatic potential surface of house fly Cytb 5. (h) Comparison of residues contributing to electrostatic potential. Magenta: RvCytb 5; yellow: human Cytb 5; green: house fly Cytb 5

As was expected from the spectroscopic data, hexacoordinated b‐type heme is observed in RvCytb 5. It is ligated by His56 and His80, which form hydrogen bonds with carbonyl O atoms of Gly59 and Phe75, respectively. The electron density map indicates that there are three different conformations of heme (Figure S1). The amino acid sequence alignment suggests that Trp18 and Tyr83 are potentially conserved residues among tardigrade Cytb 5‐like proteins (Figure 1a). Trp18 is involved in interactions between N‐ and C‐terminal regions, which are known to vary from Cytb 5 to Cytb 5. 28 The amide N atom of Trp18 forms a hydrogen bond with the side chain carboxylate group of Glu97 near the C‐terminus (Figure S2a). Similar hydrogen bonds are observed in known Cytb 5 proteins although the positions of the residues having a carboxylate group are different from that in RvCytb 5 (Figure S2b,c). The N atom of the indole group in Trp18 interacts with the carbonyl O atom of Glu97 through a water molecule. The indole ring of Trp18 also shows a CH‐π interaction with Ile21. Tyr83 on αE indirectly interacts with amino acid residues on the same helix (Figure S2a). Moreover, this bulky Tyr residue shows a van der Waals contact with one of the methyl carbon atoms in the heme. These interactions are not observed in typical Cytb 5 proteins (Figure S2b,c). Figure 2e shows the electrostatic potential surface of RvCytb 5. In RvCytb 5, the surface surrounding the heme binding site and a cleft made by the TS loop are positively charged. Whereas, the typical Cytb 5 proteins show negatively charged surfaces around their heme binding sites (Figure 2f,g). While the surfaces of the typical Cytb 5 proteins have many residues that are negatively charged, RvCytb 5 displays positively charged residues (Figure 2h). Because the electrostatic potential surfaces of electron transfer proteins are usually optimized for their partner proteins to facilitate efficient ET complex formation, RvCytb 5 is thought to interact with proteins having negatively charged surfaces around their redox centers. That is, RvCytb 5 is probably involved in ET chains different from those related to typical Cytb 5 proteins. Considering that RvCytb 5 is a tardigrade‐specific protein, it might be involved in biological processes unique to tardigrades. Identification of the partner protein(s) for RvCytb 5 is under way.

3. MATERIALS AND METHODS

3.1. Sequence alignment

Homology analyses were performed by BLAST. 30 Sequence alignment was performed by Clustal Omega 31 for structurally characterized Cytb 5 proteins and Cytb 5‐like proteins showing the top five scores in the BLAST analysis. The alignment figure was generated by ESpript. 32 Phylogenetic analysis by a maximum likelihood method was conducted in MEGA X. 33

3.2. Protein expression and purification

The GenBank accession ID of the structural gene for RvCytb 5 from R. varieornatus is GAV03092.1. A synthesized and codon optimized DNA coding RvCytb 5(10–102) was purchased from GenScript. The gene was cloned into a pET28a vector. A 6× His tag followed by a tobacco etch virus (TEV) protease site (ENLYFQS) was attached at the N‐terminus of RvCytb 5(10–102) for purification. Its complete sequence is shown in Appendix S1 of Supporting Information. The protein was expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 Star(DE3) (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA). At culture optical density of ~0.6, 0.5 mM isopropyl β‐D‐1 thiogalactopyranoside along with 0.5 mM aminolevulinic acid was added to induce expression. After 18 hr at 18°C, the bacterial pellet was collected and then sonicated in a buffer containing 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8, 300 mM NaCl, benzonase (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA), and a complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail tablet (Roche, Basel, Basel‐Stadt, Switzerland). The resulting solution was centrifuged and supernatant was purified using a HiTrap TALON column (GE healthcare, Chicago, IL). A buffer used to equilibrate the column and wash the sample consisted of 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8 and 5 mM imidazole. A buffer used for elution consisted of 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8 and 200 mM imidazole. The sample was incubated with TEV protease and imidazole was removed through dialysis against 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8 overnight at room temperature. The sample was then loaded on a HisTrap column (GE healthcare) equilibrated by 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8 and 40 mM imidazole. The flow‐through fraction was dialyzed against 50 mM Phosphate buffer pH 6.0 and purified by a HiTrap SP column (GE healthcare). The fractions containing RvCytb 5 were collected and further purified using a Hiload 16/60 Superdex 75 gel filtration column (GE healthcare). As for gel filtration, 20 mM Tris–HCl buffer pH 8 was used.

3.3. Crystallization

Crystallization was performed by the sitting drop vapor‐diffusion method. A crystallization machine mosquito (TTP LabTech, Melbourn, Hertfordshire, UK) was used to prepare drops on 96‐well VIOLAMO plates (AS ONE, Osaka, Osaka, Japan). The reservoir solution was 60 μl, and 0.1 μl protein solution was mixed with 0.1 μl reservoir solution. After 4 months, a crystal appeared under the condition of 26 mg/ml RvCytb 5, 22% (w/v) polyethylene glycol 4000, and 50 mM 4‐(2‐hydroxyethyl)‐1‐piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) buffer pH 7.5 at 20°C. Before the crystal was frozen by liquid nitrogen, it was soaked in the crystallization solution supplemented by 15% v/v ethylene glycol.

3.4. X‐ray data collection, processing, structure solution, and refinement

X‐ray diffraction experiment was performed on the BL44XU beamline of SPring‐8, Hyogo, Japan. Diffraction images were collected at 100 K using an EIGER X 16 M detector (Dectris, Philadelphia, PA). A 0.8 mm Al attenuator was used to weaken X‐ray. The crystal‐to‐detector distance was 160 mm. The exposure time per frame and the oscillation angle were 0.1 s and 0.1°, respectively. The dataset was processed using XDS 34 and scaled by Aimless. 35 Phase determination and initial model building was performed by CRANK2. 36 Manual model building was performed using Coot. 37 The program refmac5 in the ccp4 suite 38 and the program phenix.refine 39 were used for structural refinement. Anisotropic parameters were introduced because of its high resolution. The stereochemical quality of the final model was checked by Molprobity. 40 Data collection and refinement statistics are summarized in Table 1. The coordinate and structure factor files are deposited at the Protein Data Bank (PDB code ID: 7BWH). Raw data is available at Integrated Resource for Reproducibility in Macromolecular Crystallography (https://proteindiffraction.org/).

3.5. UV–visible absorption spectroscopy

The samples were in a 1 cm quartz cell. UV–visible absorption spectra of oxidized RvCytb 5 were recorded in 20 mM HEPES pH 7.1 with spectramax M2 and softmax pro 5.4 software (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA) at room temperature. UV–vis spectrum of reduced RvCytb 5 in 20 mM HEPES pH 7.1 was recorded by adding 5 mM sodium dithionite at room temperature.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Yohta Fukuda: Conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; funding acquisition; investigation; visualization; writing‐original draft. JeeEun Kim: Data curation; formal analysis; investigation; writing‐review and editing.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supporting information

Appendix S1 Supporting Information

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Diffraction data were collected at the Osaka University beamline BL44XU at SPring‐8 under the Collaborative Research Program of Institute for Protein Research, Osaka University (Proposal No. 2019B6943). The authors would like to acknowledge the beamline staffs for their kind support during data collection. This research was supported by Japan Science and Technology Agency ACT‐X “Life and Chemistry” Grant No. JPMJAX191C (Y.F.).

Fukuda Y, Kim JE, Inoue T. Structure of cytochrome b 5 unique to tardigrades. Protein Science. 2020;29:1829–1835. 10.1002/pro.3896

Funding information Japan Science and Technology Agency, Grant/Award Number: JPMJAX191C

REFERENCES

  • 1. Nelson DR. Current status of the Tardigrada: Evolution and ecology. Integrat Comparat Biol. 2002;42:652–659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Keilin D. The problem of anabiosis or latent life: History and current concept. Proc Roy Soc Lond B. 1959;150:149–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Møbjerg N, Halberg KA, Jørgensen A, et al. Survival in extreme environments – On the current knowledge of adaptations in tardigrades. Acta Physiol. 2011;202:409–420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Rahm PG. Biologische und physiologische Beiträge zur Kenntnis de Moosfauna Zeitschrift allgemeine. Physiologie. 1921;20:1–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Becquerel P. La suspension de la vie au dessus de 1/20 K absolu par demagnetization adiabatique de l'alun de fer dans le vide les plus eléve. Compt Rend Hebdomad Séances de l'Acad Sci. 1950;231:261–263. [Google Scholar]
  • 6. May RM, Maria M, Guimard MJ. Action différentielle des rayons x et ultraviolets sur le tardigrade Macrobiotus areolatus, a l'état actif et desséché. Bull Biol Fr Belg. 1964;98:349–367. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Horikawa DD, Sakashita T, Katagiri C, et al. Radiation tolerance in the tardigrade Milnesium tardigradum . Int J Radiat Biol. 2006;82:843–848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Horikawa DD, Cumbers J, Sakakibara I, et al. Analysis of DNA repair and protection in the Tardigrade Ramazzottius varieornatus and Hypsibius dujardini after exposure to UVC radiation. PLoS One. 2013;8:e64793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Horikawa DD, Yamaguchi A, Sakashita T, et al. Tolerance of anhydrobiotic eggs of the Tardigrade Ramazzottius varieornatus to extreme environments. Astrobiology. 2012;12:283–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Utsugi K, Noda H. Vacuum tolerance of tardigrades. Proc NIPR Symp Polar Biol. 1995;8:202. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ono F, Saigusa M, Uozumi T, et al. Effect of high hydrostatic pressure on to life of the tiny animal tardigrade. J Phys Chem Solid. 2008;69:2297–2300. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Seki K, Toyoshima M. Preserving tardigrades under pressure. Nature. 1998;395:853–854. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Ramløv H, Westh P. Cryptobiosis in the Eutardigrade Adorybiotus (Richtersius) coronifer: Tolerance to alcohols, temperature and de novo protein synthesis. Zoolog Anzeiger. 2001;240:517–523. [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Horikawa DD, Kunieda T, Abe W, et al. Establishment of a rearing system of the extremotolerant tardigrade Ramazzottius varieornatus: A new model animal for astrobiology. Astrobiology. 2008;8:549–556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Jönsson KI, Rabbow E, Schill RO, Harms‐Ringdahl M, Rettberg P. Tardigrades survive exposure to space in low earth orbit. Curr Biol. 2008;18:R729–R731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Fukuda Y, Miura Y, Mizohata E, Inoue T. Structural insights into a secretory abundant heat‐soluble protein from an anhydrobiotic tardigrade, Ramazzottius varieornatus . FEBS Lett. 2017;591:2458–2469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Fukuda Y, Inoue T. Crystal structure of secretory abundant heat soluble protein 4 from one of the toughest “water bears” micro‐animals Ramazzottius varieornatus . Protein Sci. 2018;27:993–999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Kim J, Fukuda Y, Inoue T. Crystal structure of Kumaglobin: A hexacoordinated heme protein from an anhydrobiotic tardigrade, Ramazzottius varieornatus . FEBS J. 2019;286:1287–1304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Smith MA, Cross AR, Jones OTG, Griffiths WT, Stymne S, Stobart K. Electron‐transport components of the 1‐acyl‐2‐oleoyl‐sn‐glycero‐3‐phosphocholine Δ12‐desaturase (Δ12‐desaturase) in microsomal preparations from developing safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cotyledons. Biochem J. 1990;272:23–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Fukushima H, Grinstead GF, Gaylor JL. Total enzymic synthesis of cholesterol from lanosterol. Cytochrome b5‐dependence of 4‐methyl sterol oxidase. J Biol Chem. 1981;256:4822–4826. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Hultquist DE, Passon PG. Catalysis of methaemoglobin reduction by erythrocyte cytochrome b5 and cytochrome b5 reductase. Nat New Biol. 1971;229:252–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Hashimoto T, Horikawa DD, Saito Y, Kuwahara H, Kozuka‐Hata H, Shin‐I T, Minakuchi Y, Ohishi K, Motoyama A, Aizu T, Enomoto A, Kondo K, Tanaka S, Hara Y, Koshikawa S, Sagara H, Miura T, Yokobori SI, Miyagawa K, Suzuki Y, Kubo T, Oyama M, Kohara Y, Fujiyama A, Arakawa K, Katayama T, Toyoda A, Kunieda T (2016) Extremotolerant tardigrade genome and improved radiotolerance of human cultured cells by tardigrade‐unique protein. Nat Commun 7:12808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Ozols J, Strittmatter P. Interaction of porphyrins and metalloporphyrins with apocytochrome b5 . J Biol Chem. 1964;239:1018–1023. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Dewilde S, Kiger L, Burmester T, et al. Biochemical characterization and ligand binding properties of neuroglobin, a novel member of the globin family. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:38949–38955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Sawai H, Kawada N, Yoshizato K, Nakajima H, Aono S, Shiro Y. Characterization of the heme environmental structure of cytoglobin, a fourth globin in humans. Biochemistry. 2003;42:5113–5142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Smagghe BJ, Sarath G, Ross E, J‐l H, Hargrove MS. Slow ligand binding kinetics dominate ferrous hexacoordinate hemoglobin reactivities and reveal differences between plants and other species. Biochemistry. 2006;45:561–570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Parthasarathy S, Altuve A, Terzyan S, et al. Accommodating a non‐conservative internal mutation by water‐mediated hydrogen‐bonding between beta‐sheet strands: A comparison of human and rat type B (mitochondrial) cytochrome b5 . Biochemistry. 2011;50:5544–5554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Wang L, Cowley AB, Terzyan S, Zhang X, Benson DR. Comparison of cytochromes b5 from insects and vertebrates. Proteins. 2007;67:293–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Magalhaes A, Maigret B, Hoflack J, Gomes JNF, Scheraga HA. Contribution of unusual arginine‐arginine short‐range interactions to stabilization and recognition in proteins. J Protein Chem. 1994;13:195–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, et al. Fast, scalable generation of high‐quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal omega. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7:539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Robert X, Gouet P. Deciphering key features in protein structures with the new ENDscript server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:W320–W324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:1547–1549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Kabsch W. XDS. Acta Crystallogr. 2010;D66(2):125–132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Evans PR, Murshudov GN. How good are my data and what is the resolution? Acta Cryst. 2013;D69(7):1204–1214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Skubak P, Pannu NS. Automatic protein structure solution from weak X‐ray data. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K. Features and development of coot. Acta Cryst. 2010;D66(4):486–501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Murshudov GN, Skubak P, Lebedev AA, Pannu NS, Steiner RA, Nicholls RA, Winn MD, Long F, Vagin AA. REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Cryst. 2011;D67(4):355–367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Terwilliger TC, Zwart PH. PHENIX: A comprehensive python‐based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. 2010;D66(2):213–221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Chen VB, Arendall WB, 3rd Headd JJ, Keedy DA, Immormino RM, Kapral GJ, Murray LW, Richardson JS, Richardson DC. MolProbity: All‐atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Cryst. 2010;D66(1):12–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Appendix S1 Supporting Information


Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES