Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 24.
Published in final edited form as: FASEB J. 2020 Feb 6;34(3):4445–4461. doi: 10.1096/fj.201902287R

Evidence of vasculature and chondrocyte to osteoblast transdifferentiation in craniofacial synovial joints: implications for osteoarthritis diagnosis and therapy

Angela Ruscitto 1, Mallory M Morel 1, Carrie J Shawber 2, Gwendolyn Reeve 3, Michael K Lecholop 4, Daniel Bonthius 5, Hai Yao 5,6, Mildred C Embree 1,*
PMCID: PMC7380713  NIHMSID: NIHMS1588492  PMID: 32030828

Abstract

Temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJ OA) leads to permanent cartilage destruction, jaw dysfunction, and compromises quality of life. However, the pathological mechanisms governing TMJ OA are poorly understood. Unlike appendicular articular cartilage, the TMJ has two distinct functions as the synovial joint of the craniofacial complex and also as the site for endochondral jaw bone growth. The established dogma of endochondral bone ossification is that hypertrophic chondrocytes undergo apoptosis, while invading vasculature with osteoprogenitors replace cartilage with bone. However, contemporary murine genetic studies support the direct differentiation of chondrocytes into osteoblasts and osteocytes in the TMJ. Here we sought to characterize putative vasculature and cartilage to bone transdifferentiation using healthy and diseased TMJ tissues from miniature pigs and humans. During endochondral ossification, the presence of fully formed vasculature expressing CD31+ endothelial cells and α-SMA+ vascular smooth muscle cells were detected within all cellular zones in growing miniature pigs. Arterial, endothelial, venous, angiogenic and mural cell markers were significantly upregulated in miniature pig TMJ tissues relative to donor matched knee meniscus fibrocartilage tissue. Upon surgically creating TMJ OA in miniature pigs, we discovered increased vasculature and putative chondrocyte to osteoblast transformation dually marked by COL2 and BSP or RUNX2 within the vascular bundles. Pathological human TMJ tissues also exhibited increased vasculature, while isolated diseased human TMJ cells exhibited marked increased in vasculature markers relative to control 293T cells. Our data provide evidence to suggest that the TMJ in higher order species are in fact vascularized. There have been no reports of cartilage to bone transdifferentiation or vasculature in human-relevant TMJ OA large animal models or in human TMJ tissues and cells. Therefore, these findings may potentially alter the clinical management of TMJ OA by defining new drugs that target angiogenesis or block the cartilage to bone transformation.

Introduction

Hyaline articular cartilage lines joint surfaces in adults and is primarily comprised of chondrocytes that maintain a relatively low rate of metabolic turnover under hypoxic conditions1,2. Chondrocytes are embedded within an avascular, extracellular matrix (ECM) enriched in proteoglycans and non-collagenous proteins that are fixed in a complex network of collagens35. The ECM provides diverse functions in articular cartilage, including providing biomechanical strength, anchorage for chondrocytes and regulation of intercellular and ECM communication67. Osteoarthritis (OA) is characterized by progressive degeneration of the articular cartilage ECM, as well changes to the surrounding joint tissues4,810. Given that it is well established that cartilage is avascular11,12, the current OA pathological paradigm supports the idea that chondrocyte phenotypic stability plays a pivotal role in maintaining the delicate balance of tissue and ECM homeostasis1,6,7,14,15. During OA pathogenesis, the functional demands of the articular cartilage surpass the chondrocytes’ ability to repair the ECM, leading to changes in chondrocyte phenotype and cartilage degradation4,9,15.

While these concepts are well-established for hyaline articular cartilages lining the appendicular skeleton, little is known about chondrocyte stability in the fibrocartilage craniofacial synovial joint called the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). The TMJ is comprised of the temporal bone and the mandible separated by a fibrocartilaginous disc and is critical for eating and speaking16. Unlike hyaline articular cartilage of the axial skeleton, the TMJ mandibular condyle is secondary fibrocartilage, derived from periosteum, and has a distinctive dual nature acting as both a site for jaw bone growth through endochondral ossification and as a permanent articular cartilage1719. Given these distinct differences between hyaline articular cartilage and craniofacial articular cartilage, it is likely that the processes regulating TMJ homeostasis and osteoarthritis are different20.

Recent evidence using powerful lineage tracing experiments has transformed the central dogma of endochondral ossification. Mouse genetics has provided evidence of the direct differentiation of chondrocytes into osteoblasts and osteocytes during endochondral bone formation in the TMJ condyle, as well as in the long bone growth plate and during bone fracture healing2124. However, the mechanisms governing the chondrocyte to osteoblast/osteocyte transformation in the TMJ are not well defined. Furthermore, whether the direct transformation of chondrocytes to osteoblasts and osteocytes contributes to TMJ OA and other TMJ and jaw pathologies in humans is unknown. Given that endothelial cells and invading vasculature have been shown to provide critical environmental cues that trigger the cartilage to bone transformation during bone fracture healing25, we hypothesize that the vasculature also plays a vital role in the cartilage to bone transformation in the TMJ.

Here we characterized the putative vasculature and chondrocyte to osteoblast transformation using both healthy and osteoarthritic TMJ tissues and cells from a preclinical, miniature pig model and in human patients. We discover for the first time the presence of fully formed vasculature within the TMJ condylar cartilage in both healthy and diseased TMJs in miniature pigs and in humans. Our data further reveal the presence of transitional cells that co-express both cartilage and bone markers embedded within vascular fibrocartilaginous bundles and cartilage ECM, which may represent a critical cell fate phenotypic change from chondrocytes to osteoblasts. These studies represent a paradigm shift in cartilage and TMJ biology, where higher order species have vascularized craniofacial articular joints that may drive the critical phenotypic switch from chondrocyte to osteoblast fate specification. Our work may alter the clinical management of TMJ OA patients and help define new therapeutic targets that both inhibit angiogenesis and cartilage to bone transformation.

Materials and Methods

Animals.

All animal procedures were performed using equal number of male/female 28 week-old Yucatan™ miniature pigs with approval from the Institution of Animal Care and Use Committee at the Medical University of South Carolina (2017–00047). 12 week-old miniature pigs and 28 week-old Mongrel canines were donated through cadaver tissue sharing services at Columbia University Irving Medical Center.

TMJ Injury Model.

TMJ osteoarthritis was surgically induced in Yucatan™ miniature pigs using a disc perforation model as previously described26,27. An oblique incision was created superior to the zygomatic process. Tissue was elevated and retracted to access the TMJ superior joint space and the disc was retracted posteriorly. A periosteal elevator was placed under the disc to protect the condyle from injury. A punch biopsy was used to create a 5.0 mm perforation in the posterior-lateral portion of the TMJ disc and the perforated disc tissue was excised (Supplemental Figure 1). No disc attachments were severed and the disc reduced to its normal anatomical location upon release of disc retraction. Sham surgery was performed where the TMJ superior joint space was accessed, and the disc was not perforated. Miniature pigs were euthanized 3–4 weeks after surgery for histological evaluation.

Human Samples.

Human TMJ tissue samples were collected and analyzed from patients who were undergoing TMJ arthroscopy, arthrocentesis or joint replacement surgery for TMJ treatment. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Columbia University Irving Medical Center (AAAQ8195) and the Institutional Review Board of Weill Cornell New York Presbyterian (1608017486-A002). All subjects were provided with written informed consent prior to study enrollment. All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Cell isolation and culture.

TMJ fibrocartilage, condyle, disc, subchondral bone, and knee meniscus were dissected from miniature pigs. Pig and human tissues, derived from patients undergoing TMJ surgery, were digested with dispase II/collagenase I (4mg/ml, 3mg/ml) and single cell suspensions of cells were cultured (5% CO2, 37°C) in basal medium consisting of DMEM (Invitrogen 11885–092) supplemented with 20% lot-selected fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco ES Cell FBS, 10439–024), glutamax (Invitrogen 35050–061), penicillin-streptomycin (Invitrogen 15140–163), and 100 mM 2-mercaptoethanol (Gibco) for 4–6 days. Cells were detached with trypsin-EDTA (GIBCO) and plated at P1 for the in vitro experiments. 293T were acquired from (ATCC) and maintained in IMDM (Gibco) + 10 % HI-FBS + 1× Penn/Strep.

Histology & Immunohistochemistry.

Tissue samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, decalcified in EDTA, and prepared for either paraffin or frozen embedded sections. Serial tissue sections were stained hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). For immunohistochemistry tissue sections were enzymatically treated with Chondroitinase ABC (Fisher C3667–10UN), blocked with 3% BSA for 1 hour, and immunolabeled with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight (Supplemental Table 1). Treatment with secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor 488, 1:1000 or Alexa Fluor 546, 1:2000) for 1 hour at room temperature was used to detect immunoreactivity. Isotype-matched negative control antibodies were used under the same conditions. ProLong™ Gold antifade reagent with DAPI (Invitrogen, P36931) was used for the nuclear counterstain.

In situ Hybridization.

RNAscope in situ hybridization (ISH, Advanced Cell Diagnostics, #323100) was performed with 5μm sections of fixed frozen pig TMJ tissues. Tissue samples were pretreated by boiling in Target Retrieval solution for 5 minutes followed by Protease III treatment for 30 minutes at 40 °C. Subsequently, the tissue samples were processed with the RNAscope Mulitplex Fluorescent Assay according to manufacturer protocols. We designed the probe for Pig Sox9 (NM_212843.2).

RNA Isolation and qRT-PCR.

Total RNA was purified from cells or whole tissue (Invitrogen 12183018A) and treated with DNAse I (Ambion AM2222) to remove genomic DNA. RNA quantity and purity was determined using Nanodrop. RNA samples (260/280≥1.8) were used to obtain cDNA (Biorad AM2222). Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems4309155) and pre- designed primers (Supplemental Table 2) for both human (Hs) and pig (Ss) (Integrated DNA Technologies). Gene expression levels were normalized to the housekeeping gene Gapdh.

ELISA.

The VEGF (Boster EK0539) concentrations in human TMJ cells were measured using the quantitative sandwich enzyme immunoassay technique following manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, standard or sample (100 μL) was added to each well and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C, followed by treatment with primary antibody using either biotinylated anti-human VEGF antibody for 1 h at 37 °C. For antibody detection, 100 μL of HRP-Avidin was for 1 h at 37 °C. After washing, TMB substrate was added to each well for 15–30 min at 37 °C, followed by the addition of 50 μL of Stop Solution. The optical density (OD) of each well was determined using a microplate reader at 450 nm. The VEGF concentrations were calculated by comparing the OD of each sample to the standard curve.

Histomorphometry.

Pig TMJ tissue sections immunolabelled with Type I Collagen (COL2A1), MZ marker and Type II Collagen (COL1), SZ marker were used to delineate these different zones. The thickness of the Type II collagen positive maturation zone (MZ) versus the Type I Collagen superficial zone (SZ) was measured in both the Sham and Injury. All measurements were quantified using Olympus cellSens Dimension imaging software.

Statistical Analysis.

All statistics were calculated using Prism 7 Graphpad Software. The statistical significance between two groups was determined using paired Student’s t-test assuming Gaussian distribution. The normality of distribution was confirmed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and the resulting two-tailed P-value ≤ 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant difference. Among two groups, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test was used for statistical comparisons. For multiple comparisons, a two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc was used for statistical comparisons.

Results

Miniature pig craniofacial synovial joint harbors non-lateral cellular zones of maturation interrupted by vascularized fibrocartilaginous bundles.

During rodent jaw development28,29, lateral cellular zones of maturation mark the TMJ mandibular condylar cartilage, including the superficial zone (SZ) harboring fibrocartilage stem cells (FCSCs)27,30, polymorphic zone (PM) containing heterogeneous proliferating cells, maturation zone (MZ) harboring chondrocytes, hypertrophic zone (HZ) harboring terminally differentiated hypertrophic chondrocytes, and the erosive zone (EZ) where cartilage is resorbed by osteoclasts and osteoprogenitors form bone29,31,32. While rodent mammals have provided significant insight into mammalian TMJ morphogenesis, large animal models provide significant advantages over rodents, including similarity to human physiology and pathology33,34. Unlike rodents, pigs are more similar to humans given pig condyles articulate with the articular eminence as opposed to the fossa, have bilateral occlusion, facilitate translational mechanics, have similar disc anatomy, and have analogous biomechanics3540. Therefore miniature pigs are well-accepted as an ideal preclinical, large animal species for studying TMJ38 most similar to humans. To gain insight into the preclinical pig TMJ model, we collected samples from growing 12 week-old Yucatan™ miniature pigs and assessed the expression of the fibrocartilage marker, type I collagen (COL1); cartilage markers, aggrecan (ACAN), type II collagen (COL2A1) and Sox9; and bone markers, bone sialoprotein (BSP) and RUNX2, by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization. Histological evaluation of H&E sections demonstrated that, unlike rodents, the miniature pig TMJ condyle exhibits non-lateral cellular zones of maturation that were distinct morphologically (Fig. 1a). The expression pattern of the disc and condyle differed. The disc expressed both fibrocartilage and cartilage markers, including COL1 and ACAN respectively, but did not express COL2A1, BSP, RUNX2, and Sox9 (Fig. 1b). Distinct expression profiles defined the cellular zones of maturation within the miniature pig TMJ mandibular condyle. Sox9, COL2A1, BSP, and RUNX2 were expressed in the maturation and hypertrophic zones (Fig. 1c), suggesting that chondroprogenitors (Sox9+), chondrocytes (COL2A1+) and bone cells (BSP+, RUNX2+) occupied these zones. COL1 was expressed in the fibrocartilaginous superficial zone (Fig. 1c).

Figure 1: Miniature pig TMJ mandibular condyle harbor non-lateral cellular zones of maturation interrupted by fibrocartilaginous type I collagen bundles.

Figure 1:

(a) H&E of 12 week-old miniature pig TMJ mandibular condyle depicting the cellular zones if maturation, including superficial zone (SZ) polymorphic zone (PM), maturation zone (MZ), and hypertrophic zone (HZ). Scale bar, 500μM. (b) Miniature pig TMJ disc H&E, in situ hybridization for Sox9, and immunohistochemistry for aggrecan (ACAN), runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2), type II collagen (COL2A1), bone sialoprotein (BSP), and type I collagen (COL1A1). Scale bar, 100μM. (c) Miniature pig TMJ condylar cartilage H&E, in situ hybridization for Sox9, and immunohistochemistry for aggrecan (ACAN), runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2), type II collagen (COL2A1), bone sialoprotein (BSP), and type I collagen (COL1A1). Scale bar, 100μM. (d) qRT-PCR of miniature pig SZ tissue relative to condylar cartilage tissue (PM+MZ+HZ). Data represented are mean fold change normalized to GAPDH; n=3; ****p≤0.0001; Student’s t-test

To confirm our in vivo findings, we performed qRT-PCR using RNA isolated from whole TMJ miniature pig tissue. qRT-PCR also showed fibrocartilage marker Col1 significantly up-regulated in the SZ and disc relative to condylar cartilage (CC) tissue, whereas cartilage marker Col2a1 was significantly up regulated in CC relative to the SZ and disc tissue (Fig. 1d). Most strikingly COL1 positive cellular bundles was also in areas surrounding mature chondrocytes (COL2A1+) and contained vascular-like epithelium (arrows, Fig. 1a and Fig 1c), which spanned within all of the cellular zones of maturation. These data suggest for the first time the presence of vascularized cartilage within miniature pig craniofacial synovial joint.

Evidence of vasculature within type I collagen fibrocartilage bundles in miniature pig craniofacial synovial joints.

To confirm the presence of vasculature within the TMJ mandibular condylar cartilage in miniature pigs, we characterized two cell types found in functional blood vessels, including endothelial cells (ECs) and vascular mural cells, which comprise pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cells (vSMCs)41,42 (Fig. 2). To determine the distribution of endothelial cells, which form the inner vessel wall, and mural cells, which surround the endothelial cell tube for structural support and regulation of diameter and blood flow, we examined the presence of CD31+ ECs43 and alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA)+ vSMCs by immunohistochemistry (Figs. 2a2h). The anterior and posterior horn of the knee meniscus has been reported to contain a vascular supply4447 and was used as positive control tissue for confirming CD31+ ECs and α-SMA+ vSMCs immunostainings (Figs. 2i2k). Disc α-SMA+ cells were associated with low expression CD31+ ECs (Figs. 2a2c). The expression pattern within the knee meniscus tissue was similar to that of the disc, where α-SMA+ vSMCs were associated with low expression of CD31+ ECs (Figs. 2j, 2k). Within the mandibular condyle SZ and PM zones, CD31+ ECs were associated with surrounding α-SMA+ vSMCs (Figs. 2d2g). CD31+ ECs forming an inner vessel wall was associated with surrounding α-SMA+ vSMCs embedded within the COL1A1 collagen bundles in MZ zone containing mature COL2A1+ chondrocytes (Figs. 2d, 2e, 2h).

Figure 2: Evidence of vasculature in miniature pig TMJ mandibular condyle and disc.

Figure 2:

(a–c) H&E and immunohistochemistry for cluster of differentiation 31 (CD31) and alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) in 12 week-old miniature pig TMJ disc. Scale bar, 100μM. (d–h) H&E and immunohistochemistry for CD31 and α-SMA in 12-week old miniature pig TMJ mandibular condyle within the superficial zone (SZ) (f), polymorphic zone (PZ) (g), and maturation zone (MZ) (h). Scale bar, 100μM. (i–k) H&E and immunohistochemistry in 12 week-old pig meniscus for CD31 and α-SMA. Scale bar, 100μM. (l–p) qRT-PCR using RNA from whole tissue derived from miniature pig TMJ fibrocartilage (FC), subchondral bone (SB), condylar cartilage (CC), and disc relative to the knee meniscus. Data represented are mean fold change normalized to GAPDH; n=3; *p ≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p≤0.001, ****p≤0.0001; Student’s t-test.

To corroborate our in vivo data demonstrating the presence of blood vessels in the miniature pig TMJ, we evaluated gene transcripts of endothelial cell markers (CD31, VE-cadherin)43,48, mural cell marker (Pdgfrβ)49,50, arterial vessel markers (Ephrinb2, α-SMA)42,51,52, venous marker (Ephb4)41,42,52, and markers for angiogenetic mediators (Vegfa, Vegfr-2)5356 by qRT-PCR using RNA derived from whole TMJ tissues (Figs. 2l2p). We isolated RNA from miniature pig TMJ fibrocartilage (FC) containing the SZ, condylar cartilage (CC) harboring the PZ, MZ and HZ, subchondral bone (SB) harboring the EZ, and the TMJ disc27,30. As a control, we compared all vascular transcripts in TMJ tissues relative to donor-matched vascularized knee meniscus tissue4447. Similar to our in vivo data, the expression of endothelial cell markers (CD31, VE-cadherin)43,48 were significantly upregulated in the TMJ fibrocartilage, condylar cartilage and disc in comparison to the knee meniscus tissue (Fig. 2l), while the mural cell marker Pdgfrβ)49,50 was upregulated in the TMJ condylar cartilage in comparison to knee meniscus (Fig. 2m). The expression of arterial vessel markers (Ephrinb2, α-SMA)42,51,52 (Fig. 2n) and the venous marker (Ephb4)41,42,52 (Fig. 2o) were all significantly upregulated in the TMJ fibrocartilage (SZ) and the condylar cartilage (PZ, MZ, HZ), suggesting that both arteries and veins span throughout all of the cellular zones in the TMJ mandibular condyle and also in the TMJ disc. Moreover, we found mediators of angiogenesis (Vegfa, Vegfr-2)5356 were also significantly upregulated in the TMJ fibrocartilage, condylar cartilage and disc relative to the knee meniscus, suggesting active angiogenesis in TMJ (Fig. 2p). Strikingly, endothelial cell markers (Fig 2l), arterial markers (Fig. 2n) and venous marker (Fig. 2o) were more significantly upregulated in the TMJ fibrocartilage and condylar cartilage than in subchondral bone tissue when compared to knee meniscus tissue, suggesting that blood vessels may be more abundant in cartilage than in the underlying bone. While miniature pig TMJs exhibit vasculature, it is generally accepted that smaller species like rodents do not. Given that, unlike rodents, miniature pig TMJs undergo sliding or translational joint movements, we further investigated whether joint biomechanics may play a role in the presence of vasculature by evaluating the TMJs of dogs with mainly hinge or rotational movement57 (Supplemental Figure 2). Immunohistochemistry showed that canine TMJ disc had α-SMA+ vSMCs that were also associated with expression of CD31+ ECs (Supplemental Figure 2a2c). However, canine condyle exhibited fibrocartilaginous SZ tissue with α-SMA+ vSMCs that were associated with low expression of CD31+ ECs, and no cellular zones of maturation (Supplemental Figure 2d2f). These data suggest that translational mechanics present in pigs may be critical for the presence of more complex vasculature. Taken together, these data reveal for the first time the presence of blood vessels within miniature pig TMJ. However, whether the presence of blood vessels alters TMJ injury or pathology in miniature pig is unknown.

Increased expression of bone-associated proteins is coupled with altered vasculature architecture in injured miniature pig mandibular condylar cartilage.

To determine the putative role of vasculature in miniature pig TMJ pathology, we created a surgically induced TMJ disc perforation animal model (Fig. 3). We have previously published that surgically creating a perforation in the TMJ discs of rabbits leads to secondary TMJ condylar degeneration and OA26,27. We aimed to recapitulate the TMJ disc perforation model in miniature pigs and characterize the vasculature phenotype. A punch biopsy was used to create a 5.0 mm perforation in the posterior-lateral TMJ disc and the perforated tissue was excised (Supplemental Figure 1)26,27. Sham surgery control was performed where the TMJ superior joint space was accessed but the disc was not perforated. The pigs were euthanized 4 weeks after surgery for analysis.

Figure 3: Development of TMJ disc perforation injury model in miniature pigs.

Figure 3:

A 0.5 mm perforation was surgically created in 28 week-old miniature pig TMJ disc, while sham operation served as a comparison control. TMJ discs and condyles were analyzed 4 weeks following surgery. (a) H&E of sham operated and injured (b) miniature pig TMJ mandibular condyle depicting the zones maturation, including superficial zone (SZ) polymorphic zone (PM), maturation zone (MZ), and hypertrophic zone (HZ). Scale bar, 500μM. (c) Histomorphometric analysis of the superficial zone (SZ) and maturation zone (MZ) thickness in the sham control and injury models; ***p≤0.001; Student’s t-test. (d) H&E and immunohistochemistry in sham operated pig TMJ condyle for aggrecan (ACAN), runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2), type II collagen (COL2A1), bone sialoprotein (BSP), and type I collagen (COL1). Scale bar, 100μM. (e) H&E and immunohistochemistry in the injured pig TMJ condyle for aggrecan (ACAN), runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2), type II collagen (COL2A1), bone sialoprotein (BSP), and type I collagen (COL1). Scale bar, 100μM.

Histological evaluation showed the disc in both conditions was positive for COL1a1 and ACAN expression and negative for COL2a1, BSP, and RUNX2 (Supplemental 3a). Histology further demonstrated that alterations in the thickness of the condylar cartilage and cellular zones of maturation in the injury model relative to the sham control (Figs. 3a, 3b, Supplemental Figures 3b, 3c). Histomorphometric analysis revealed that the COL1a1+ SZ was significantly thicker in the injury when compared to the sham controls (Fig. 3c), suggesting an expansion of the fibrocartilaginous condylar cartilage tissue. However, the COL2+ MZ thickness significantly decreased upon disc perforation injury when compared to the sham controls (Fig. 3c), suggesting a loss of mature COL2a1+ chondrocytes, which are critical for cartilage function1,13. Immunohistochemical analysis confirmed a loss of COL2a1 expression in the injured TMJ condyle relative to sham controls (Figs. 3d, 3e). Most notably, the injured TMJ condyle demonstrated an expansion of bone-related proteins in the MZ and HZ, including BSP and RUNX2, relative to sham controls, suggesting that the loss of COL2a1+ chondrocytes was coupled with a gain of bone-like cells (Fig. 3d, 3e). These data reveal that the TMJ disc perforation injury model causes a loss of cartilage thickness and COL2a1+ chondrocytes, which is coupled with an expansion of fibrocartilage tissue and bone-like cells.

To investigate the vascular epithelium, including ECs and vSMCs, in miniature pig TMJ upon pathological injury, we performed immunohistochemistry for CD31+ ECs and α-SMA+ vSMCs (Fig. 4) in sham (Figs. 4a4h) and injured miniature pigs (Figs. 4i4p). The sham operated disc (Figs. 4a4c), injured disc (Figs. 4i4k), and the sham mandibular condylar cartilage (Figs. 4d4h), including the SZ (Fig. 4f), PZ (Fig. 4g), and MZ (Fig. 4h), showed αSMA+ vSMCs vessels with no CD31+ EC expression. However, immunohistochemical analysis of the injured condylar cartilage SZ (Fig. 4n), PZ (Fig. 4o), and MZ (Fig. 4p) showed CD31+ECs surrounded by αSMA+ vSMCs. Interestingly, the vascularized collagen bundles within the MZ zone (Fig. 4p) harbored CD31+ ECs associated with αSMA+ cells. Thus the vascular architecture is altered upon TMJ injury. Furthermore, the presence of CD31+ ECs in injured miniature pig TMJ condylar cartilage, suggests angiogenesis may play a critical role in disease and/or repair upon TMJ pathology. In addition, the amount of vasculature bundles in the SZ of the injured mandibular condyle was more abundant in comparison to the sham condyle. However, the role of new blood vessel formation in TMJ disease and/or pathology is unclear.

Figure 4. Alterations in vascular architecture in miniature pig TMJ injury model.

Figure 4.

(a–c) H&E and immunohistochemistry, in 7 month-old sham miniature pig disc, for cluster of differentiation 31 (CD31, green) and alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA, red). Scale bar, 100μM. (d–h) H&E and immunohistochemistry, in 7 month-old sham miniature pig TMJ mandibular condyle, for CD31 and α-SMA within the superficial zone (SZ) (f), polymorphic zone (PZ) (g), and maturation zone (MZ) (h). Scale bar, 100μM. (i–k) H&E and immunohistochemistry, in injured miniature pig disc for CD31 (green) and α-SMA (red). Scale bar, 100μM. (l–p) H&E and immunohistochemistry, in injured miniature pig TMJ mandibular condyle, for CD31 (green) and α-SMA (red) within the superficial zone (SZ) (n), polymorphic zone (PZ) (o), and maturation zone (MZ) (p). Scale bar, 100μM.

Evidence of cartilage to bone transformation in injured miniature pig mandibular condylar cartilage and in pathological human mandibular condylar cartilage.

Recent studies in mouse genetics have revealed that in the murine TMJ mandibular condyle, chondrocytes directly differentiate into osteoblasts and osteocytes during endochondral bone formation in the TMJ condyle, as well as in fracture healing in the long bone2124. Moreover, signals from the blood vasculature have been shown to direct the cartilage to bone transformation during fracture healing25. Our data reveal that there is an expansion of bone associated proteins BSP and RUNX2 (Fig. 3), which is coupled with an increase in CD31+ ECs and alterations in blood vessel structure in the mandibular condylar cartilage upon TMJ injury (Fig. 4). Thus we investigated putative cartilage to bone transformation in our miniature pig injury model (Fig. 5). Sham operated miniature pig TMJ condyles showed no evidence of transitional cells co-expressing RUNX2+/COL2A1+ or BSP+/COL2A1+along vascular bundles (Fig. 5ad). Localized adjacent to fibrocartilaginous vascular bundles (Fig. 5e5f, black arrows), immunohistochemistry showed putative transitional cells that expressed both bone and cartilage markers, RUNX2+/COL2A1+ cells (Fig. 5g, white arrows) and BSP+/COL2A1+ cells (Fig. 5h, white arrows). Interestingly, RUNX2+/COL2A1+ and BSP+/COL2A1+ were embedded within COL2A1 enriched ECM (Figs. 5g5h). Interestingly, the presence of RUNX2+/COL2A1+ and BSP+/COL2A1+ transdifferentiated cells in the injured miniature pig condyle is coupled with an overall loss of a cartilage ECM enrich in COL2a1, and transition into a bone-like ECM phenotype (Fig. 3). These data are similar to other studies showing the co-localization of chondrocyte marker with osteoblast/osteocyte markers during cartilage to bone transformation in jaw growth and bone fracture healing17,21,22,25, and provide evidence of cartilage to bone transformation in our miniature pig TMJ injury model.

Figure 5: Evidence of cartilage to bone transformation in injured miniature pig mandibular condylar cartilage and in pathological human mandibular condylar cartilage.

Figure 5:

(a,b,e,f) H&E and immunohistochemistry (c,d,g,h) of RUNX2 (green), COL2A1 (red), and bone sialoprotein (red, BSP) in sham operated miniature pig (a-d) and injured miniature pig (e–h) TMJ mandibular condyle. Scale bar (a,e), 200 μm. Scale bar (b–d, f–h), 100μM. (i) H&E and (j,k) immunohistochemistry of RUNX2 (green), COL2A1 (red), and bone sialoprotein (red, BSP) in the mandibular condylar cartilage of a human patient with condylar hyperplasia. Scale bar (i), 200 um. Scale bar (j,k), 100 μm.

We further investigated whether cartilage to bone transformation in the TMJ mandibular condyle plays a critical role in mediating TMJ pathology in human patients. Condylar hyperplasia5860 is diagnosed radiographically and characterized by excessive mandibular condyle bone growth that usually presents unilaterally, resulting in facial asymmetry61. In a patient with condylar hyperplasia, we examined evidence of chondrocyte transdifferentiation into osteoblasts by immunohistochemistry (Fig. 5ik). Our data revealed the presence of RUNX2+/COL2A1+ cells (white arrows, Fig. 5j) and BSP+/COL2A1+ cells (white arrows, Fig. 5k) embedded within a COL2a1 enriched ECM, providing evidence of putative cartilage to bone transformation in this patient. These data implicate that chondrocyte to osteoblast/osteocyte differentiation may play a crucial role during the progression of human TMJ pathology, including condylar hyperplasia.

Evidence of vasculature in pathological human TMJ tissues.

Given that we discovered that injured miniature pig showed an increased expression of bone markers (Fig. 3) that was coupled with alterations vasculature architecture (Fig. 4) and evidence of cartilage to bone transformation (Fig. 5), we investigated whether blood vessels were associated with pathological human TMJ tissues (Fig. 6). Similar to miniature pig TMJ discs, immunohistochemistry showed that osteoarthritic human TMJ discs expressed COL1A1, ACAN, and COL2A1 (Supplemental 4a4b), but did not express bone markers BSP or RUNX2 (Supplemental 4c4d). Pathological osteoarthritic human TMJ synovium tissue expressed COL1A1 and ACAN, but not COL2A1, BSP or RUNX2 (Supplemental 4e4h). We examined ECs by CD31 expression and the vSMCs by alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) expression using immunohistochemistry in human osteoarthritic disc and synovium (Fig. 6). Both the disc (Fig. 6ab) and synovium (Fig. 6cd) contain CD31+ ECs that are also surrounded by αSMA+ cells, where αSMA+ expression is discontinuous and intermittent, suggesting that the vasculature has a leaky architecture. To corroborate these in vivo findings, we examined the expression of arterial (Ephrinb2, α-SMA), endothelial (CD31, VE-cadherin), venous (Ephb4), angiogenesis (Vegfa, Vegfr-2), and mural cell (Pdgfrβ) markers by qRT-PCR using isolated osteoarthritic human primary fibrocartilage stem cells (FCSCs), subchondral bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs), and condylar chondrocytes CCs) derived from their irrespective human TMJ tissues. 293T cells served as a comparative negative control. We found a significant increase in gene transcripts for α-SMA and endothelial cells (VE- cadherin) in all osteoarthritic TMJ cell types, while mural cell marker Ephrinb2 was significantly decreased in comparison to control 293T cells (Fig. 6). However, there were significant increases in CD31 expression in FCSCs and BMSCs, Ephb4 in FCSCs, Vegfa and Vegfr-2 in FCSCs and CCs, and Pdgfrβ in BMSCs and CCs (Fig. 6). These data suggest that in a diseased state both TMJ FCSCs and CCs maintain their vascular properties and angiogenetic potential. To further confirm the presence of blood vessels in the TMJ mandibular condyle, we measured secreted vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGFA) protein levels in conditioned media from human osteoarthritic FCSCs, BMSCs, and CCs relative to control 293T cells (Fig. 6j). All TMJ cell types isolated from osteoarthritic human TMJ showed elevated secreted VEGFa levels relative to 293T cells (Fig. 6j), suggesting that pathological TMJ cells have potent angiogenic properties.

Figure 6: Vasculature present in human OA tissue.

Figure 6:

(a,b) Immunohistochemistry of a patient’s disc tissue with osteoarthritis (OA) stained for cluster of differentiation 31 (CD31) and alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA). Scale bar, 100μM. (c,d) Immunohistochemistry of a patient’s synovium tissue with osteoarthritis (OA) stained for CD31 and α-SMA. Scale bar, 100μM. (e–i) ) qRT-PCR of human fibrocartilage stem cells (FCSCs), subchondral bone cells (SBCs), and condylar cartilage cells (CCCs), relative to 293T cells. Data represented are mean fold change normalized to GAPDH, n=3 human diseased tissue; Student’s t-test. (j) ELISA was used to measure VEGF, a protein produced by cells that stimulate the formation of blood vessels, in human diseased FCSCs, SBCs, and CCCs relative to 293T cells. Data represented are mean fold change normalized to GAPDH, n=3 human samples/tissue type.

Taken together, our data show that higher order species have vascularized craniofacial articular joints that may drive the critical phenotypic switch from chondrocyte to osteoblast fate during TMJ pathology in both injured miniature pigs and in osteoarthritic human TMJ tissues. These data suggest that pharmacologically blocking angiogenesis may ameliorate TMJ OA. To test this hypothesis, we treated porcine FCSCs and osteoarthritic human FCSCs with propranolol, an anti-angiogenic and non-selective β-adrenergic blocking drug used to control the growth of infantile hemangiomas, tumors and6264. Genes associated with angiogenesis (Vegfa and Vegfr2) and bone (Runx2) were analyzed by qRT-PCR in porcine FCSCs and osteoarthritic human FCSCs treated with 100μM propranolol for 24 hours (Supplemental Figure 5). Both miniature pig (Supplemental Figure 5a) and OA human FCSCs (Supplemental Figure 5b) treated with 100μM propranolol showed significantly lower transcript levels of Vegfa, Vegr2, and Runx2 relative to vehicle control cells. These result suggest that drugs that block angiogenesis, such as propranolol, may also reduce cartilage to bone transformation. Whether blocking angiogenesis with anti-angiogenic pharmacological agents will ameliorate TMJ OA pathogenesis in vivo require further testing.

Discussion

The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is the synovial joint in the mammalian craniofacial complex that is critical for prey capture, food intake, and speech65. The TMJ is subject to osteoarthritis (OA) in humans, which can lead to permanent tissue degradation, jaw and facial asymmetry, dental malocclusion, pain, and severely impairs life quality20. Therapies are directed toward either symptom management or highly invasive joint replacement surgeries with high failure rates16. Here we show for the first time that the TMJ disc and condylar cartilage are vascularized in miniature pigs, a well-established large animal that emulates human TMJ physiology and anatomy35,40,66,67, and also in osteoarthritic human TMJ tissues. Moreover, upon surgically-induced injury and osteoarthritis we found that the vasculature architecture changes and is coupled with increased bone and evidence of cartilage to bone transformation, a phenomenon only shown until now in the TMJs of healthy growing rodents22,68. Our studies reveal a plausible paradigm shift in the treatment of TMJ OA, where pharmacological agents, such as propranolol, that either suppress angiogenesis and/or bone formation could be used to ameliorate TMJ OA pathology in humans. However, it is unclear why blood vessels are present in the TMJs of higher order species, but not in smaller species such as rodents.

Mammalian jaw evolution may provide clues as to the biological necessity of vascularized TMJs in pigs and humans and the cellular origin and mechanisms regulating TMJ morphogenesis. The primary or old jaw joint found in early vertebrates and in modern day reptiles is composed of an upper quadrate bone and a lower articular bone derived from endochondral ossification of Meckel’s cartilage65,69. However, it is speculated that the evolution of the new jaw joint arouse from the need to adapt to more complex jaw movements, a stronger bite-force and improved hearing70,71. Present day mammalian TMJ is formed independent of Meckel’s cartilage, while the posterior segments of Meckel’s cartilage evolved to form the auditory ossicles and sphenomandibular ligament71,72. While rodent mammals have provided insight into mammalian TMJ morphogenesis, large animal models give more significant advantages over rodents, including similarity to human TMJ physiology and pathology33,34. Unlike rodents, pigs are similar to humans given pig condyles articulate with the articular eminence as opposed to the fossa, have bilateral occlusion, facilitate translational mechanics, have similar disc anatomy, and have analogous biomechanics3540. Therefore miniature pigs are well-accepted as an ideal large animal species for studying TMJ38. Additional advantages in using miniature pigs as a large animal model are they grow to a similar size as humans, and have similar organ systems, physiology and metabolism as humans33. Relative to rodents34, the pig immune response is genetically and functionally analogous to humans73 making pig an ideal species to model complex human diseases, such as TMJ osteoarthritis33, and for predicting human response to joint therapies.

Mammalian TMJ development is distinct from appendicular joints, and thus may also indicate the requirement of vascularized joints. The TMJ is comprised of the glenoid fossa of the skull base, articular disc, ligaments, and the mandibular condyle of the jaw bone16. Similar to flat craniofacial bones, mandibular bone is produced by intramembranous ossification, where mesenchymal cells derived from the ectomesenchymal neural crest cells directly differentiate into osteoblasts7476. On the other hand, TMJ mandibular condyle is formed by endochondral ossification and eventually unites with the intramembranous mandibular bone to form the jaw77,78. However, the mechanisms regulating how these two boney fronts in the vertebrate jaw unite are unknown. Unlike appendicular joints formed by a single primordium79, the TMJ is formed by two different mesenchymal condensations, including the glenoid blastema undergoing intramembranous ossification80 and the condyle blastema primarily developing through endochondral ossification8183 appearing at E13.5 in mice84 and at 8th gestational week in humans85. While the precise cellular origin of the TMJ is unclear, cranial neural crest cells82 and mandible bone periosteal cells are speculated to initially form the condyle blastema84,86. The articular disc is formed from a condensation of cells that separates from the surface of the condyle blastema that divides the joint space into the inferior and superior joint cavities87,88. The inner mass of cells in the condyle blastemal undergo endochondral ossification, which is lined by perichondrium-like tissue. Remnants of this perichondrium-like tissue persist throughout the life span of mammalian adults, lines the condylar cartilage, and is classified as fibrocartilage19. In post-natal TMJ, this fibrocartilaginous tissue provides tensile strength for joint biomechanics and serves as a niche harboring fibrocartilage stem cells with potent chondrogenic and osteogenic capabilities27,30.

Our data show that mammalian TMJ in higher order species may have similar properties to vascularized perichondrium tissue. During limb bud development the initiation of endochondral ossification involves a complex and dynamic interplay among cells in the perichondrium, vascular endothelium and cartilage. Mesenchymal cells condense and differentiate into chondrocytes, while the surrounding cells elongate to form the perichondrium89,90. Perichondrium tissue is the source of osteoblasts that establish the bone periosteum and also endothelial cells that commence angiogenesis of the primary and secondary ossification centers8993. The cartilage templates forming adjacent axial bones are interrupted and separated by interzone tissue comprised of avascular mesenchymal cells at each prospective joint site, which marks the first stages of synovial joint formation79,94,95. Both long bone and synovial joint development are tightly coordinated events regulated by complex intrinsic and extrinsic factors92,95. While these developmental processes have been delineated in the axial skeletal, much less is known about the jaw and synovial joint morphogenesis in the craniofacial complex. Here we show for the first time that the TMJ in miniature pigs and humans is vascularized similar to perichondrium tissue. In fact similar endochondral ossification during bone fracture healing21,23,24, we observed evidence of lineage reprogramming, whereby chondrocytes directly differentiate into osteoblasts/osteocytes during TMJ injury and disease. Taken together, these studies provide novel insight into new therapeutic targets for the treatment of TMJ OA.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental

Acknowledgements

This investigation was supported by the following grants: NIH 5R00DE0220660 (MCE), Columbia University College of Dental Medicine Faculty Research Award (MCE), R01DE021134 (HY), and P20GM121342 (HY). Author contributions: AR designed studies, performed experiments and wrote manuscript, MMM performed experiments, CJS provided experimental advice and revised manuscript, GR maintained IRB and provided human samples, MKL designed and performed pig surgeries, DB harvested pig tissues, HY designed studies, and MCE conceptualized study and wrote manuscript.

Nonstandard Abbreviations:

TMJ

Temporomandibular joint

OA

Osteoarthritis

ECM

Extracellular matrix

BSP

bone sialoprotein

ACAN

aggrecan

H&E

hematoxylin and eosin

VEGF

vascular endothelial growth factor

FCSCs

fibrocartilage stem cells

SZ

superficial zone

PZ

polymorphic zone

MZ

maturation zone

HZ

hypertrophic zone

SB

subchondral bone

MCC

mandibular condylar cartilage

CCs

condylar chondrocytes

BMSCs

bone marrow stromal cells

EC

endothelial cells

vSMCs

vascular smooth muscle cells

Footnotes

Disclosure/Conflict of Interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Singh P, Marcu KB, Goldring MB & Otero M Phenotypic instability of chondrocytes in osteoarthritis: on a path to hypertrophy. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1442, 17–34 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Heinemeier KM, et al. Radiocarbon dating reveals minimal collagen turnover in both healthy and osteoarthritic human cartilage. Sci Transl Med 8, 346ra390 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Eyre D Collagen of articular cartilage. Arthritis Res 4, 30–35 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Embree MC, et al. Biglycan and fibromodulin have essential roles in regulating chondrogenesis and extracellular matrix turnover in temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis. Am J Pathol 176, 812–826 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wadhwa S, Embree MC, Kilts T, Young MF & Ameye LG Accelerated osteoarthritis in the temporomandibular joint of biglycan/fibromodulin double-deficient mice. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 13, 817–827 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Aigner T, Soder S, Gebhard PM, McAlinden A & Haag J Mechanisms of disease: role of chondrocytes in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis--structure, chaos and senescence. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 3, 391–399 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Squires GR, Okouneff S, Ionescu M & Poole AR The pathobiology of focal lesion development in aging human articular cartilage and molecular matrix changes characteristic of osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 48, 1261–1270 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Poole AR, et al. Osteoarthritis in the human knee: a dynamic process of cartilage matrix degradation, synthesis and reorganization. Agents Actions Suppl 39, 3–13 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sherwood J Osteoarthritis year in review 2018: biology. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 27, 365–370 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Aurich M, et al. Differential matrix degradation and turnover in early cartilage lesions of human knee and ankle joints. Arthritis Rheum 52, 112–119 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ameye L & Young MF Mice deficient in small leucine-rich proteoglycans: novel in vivo models for osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, muscular dystrophy, and corneal diseases. Glycobiology 12, 107R–116R (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Eisenstein R, Sorgente N, Soble LW, Miller A & Kuettner KE The resistance of certain tissues to invasion: penetrability of explanted tissues by vascularized mesenchyme. Am J Pathol 73, 765–774 (1973). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bora FW Jr. & Miller G Joint physiology, cartilage metabolism, and the etiology of osteoarthritis. Hand Clin 3, 325–336 (1987). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Aigner T, Kurz B, Fukui N & Sandell L Roles of chondrocytes in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 14, 578–584 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hall AC The Role of Chondrocyte Morphology and Volume in Controlling Phenotype-Implications for Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Repair, and Cartilage Engineering. Curr Rheumatol Rep 21, 38 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lark MW, et al. Aggrecan degradation in human cartilage. Evidence for both matrix metalloproteinase and aggrecanase activity in normal, osteoarthritic, and rheumatoid joints. J Clin Invest 100, 93–106 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Scrivani SJ, Keith DA & Kaban LB Temporomandibular disorders. N Engl J Med 359, 2693–2705 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hinton RJ, Jing Y, Jing J & Feng JQ Roles of Chondrocytes in Endochondral Bone Formation and Fracture Repair. J Dent Res 96, 23–30 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Morimoto K, Hashimoto N & Suetsugu T Prenatal developmental process of human temporomandibular joint. J Prosthet Dent 57, 723–730 (1987). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Benjamin M & Evans EJ Fibrocartilage. J Anat 171, 1–15 (1990). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wang XD, Zhang JN, Gan YH & Zhou YH Current understanding of pathogenesis and treatment of TMJ osteoarthritis. J Dent Res 94, 666–673 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhou X, et al. Chondrocytes transdifferentiate into osteoblasts in endochondral bone during development, postnatal growth and fracture healing in mice. PLoS Genet 10, e1004820 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jing Y, et al. Chondrocytes Directly Transform into Bone Cells in Mandibular Condyle Growth. J Dent Res 94, 1668–1675 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yang L, Tsang KY, Tang HC, Chan D & Cheah KS Hypertrophic chondrocytes can become osteoblasts and osteocytes in endochondral bone formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111, 12097–12102 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Park J, et al. Dual pathways to endochondral osteoblasts: a novel chondrocyte-derived osteoprogenitor cell identified in hypertrophic cartilage. Biol Open 4, 608–621 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hu DP, et al. Cartilage to bone transformation during fracture healing is coordinated by the invading vasculature and induction of the core pluripotency genes. Development 144, 221–234 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Embree MC, et al. Soft tissue ossification and condylar cartilage degeneration following TMJ disc perforation in a rabbit pilot study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 23, 629–639 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Embree MC, et al. Exploiting endogenous fibrocartilage stem cells to regenerate cartilage and repair joint injury. Nat Commun 7, 13073 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Owtad P, Park JH, Shen G, Potres Z & Darendeliler MA The biology of TMJ growth modification: a review. J Dent Res 92, 315–321 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shen G & Darendeliler MA The adaptive remodeling of condylar cartilage---a transition from chondrogenesis to osteogenesis. J Dent Res 84, 691–699 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nathan J, et al. Fibrocartilage Stem Cells Engraft and Self-Organize into Vascularized Bone. J Dent Res 97, 329–337 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shen G, Hagg U, Rabie AB & Kaluarachchi K Identification of temporal pattern of mandibular condylar growth: a molecular and biochemical experiment. Orthod Craniofac Res 8, 114–122 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Shen G, Rabie AB, Zhao ZH & Kaluarachchi K Forward deviation of the mandibular condyle enhances endochondral ossification of condylar cartilage indicated by increased expression of type X collagen. Arch Oral Biol 51, 315–324 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schomberg DT, et al. Miniature Swine for Preclinical Modeling of Complexities of Human Disease for Translational Scientific Discovery and Accelerated Development of Therapies and Medical Devices. Toxicol Pathol 44, 299–314 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mestas J & Hughes CC Of mice and not men: differences between mouse and human immunology. J Immunol 172, 2731–2738 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Herring SW, Decker JD, Liu ZJ & Ma T Temporomandibular joint in miniature pigs: anatomy, cell replication, and relation to loading. Anat Rec 266, 152–166 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Herring SW The dynamics of mastication in pigs. Arch Oral Biol 21, 473–480 (1976). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sindelar BJ & Herring SW Soft tissue mechanics of the temporomandibular joint. Cells Tissues Organs 180, 36–43 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bermejo A, Gonzalez O & Gonzalez JM The pig as an animal model for experimentation on the temporomandibular articular complex. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 75, 18–23 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Strom D, Holm S, Clemensson E, Haraldson T & Carlsson GE Gross anatomy of the mandibular joint and masticatory muscles in the domestic pig (Sus scrofa). Arch Oral Biol 31, 763–768 (1986). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sun Z, Liu ZJ & Herring SW Movement of temporomandibular joint tissues during mastication and passive manipulation in miniature pigs. Arch Oral Biol 47, 293–305 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kume T Specification of arterial, venous, and lymphatic endothelial cells during embryonic development. Histol Histopathol 25, 637–646 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Swift MR & Weinstein BM Arterial-venous specification during development. Circ Res 104, 576–588 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mei H, et al. Regulation of endothelial cell barrier function by antibody-driven affinity modulation of platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1). J Biol Chem 289, 20836–20844 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Gray JC Neural and vascular anatomy of the menisci of the human knee. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 29, 23–30 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Di Giancamillo A, et al. Age-related modulation of angiogenesis-regulating factors in the swine meniscus. J Cell Mol Med 21, 3066–3075 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Arnoczky SP & Warren RF The microvasculature of the meniscus and its response to injury. An experimental study in the dog. Am J Sports Med 11, 131–141 (1983). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Arnoczky SP & Warren RF Microvasculature of the human meniscus. Am J Sports Med 10, 90–95 (1982). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lampugnani MG, et al. The molecular organization of endothelial cell to cell junctions: differential association of plakoglobin, beta-catenin, and alpha-catenin with vascular endothelial cadherin (VE-cadherin). J Cell Biol 129, 203–217 (1995). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hirschi KK, Rohovsky SA & D’Amore PA PDGF, TGF-beta, and heterotypic cell-cell interactions mediate endothelial cell-induced recruitment of 10T1/2 cells and their differentiation to a smooth muscle fate. J Cell Biol 141, 805–814 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hirschi KK, Rohovsky SA, Beck LH, Smith SR & D’Amore PA Endothelial cells modulate the proliferation of mural cell precursors via platelet-derived growth factor-BB and heterotypic cell contact. Circ Res 84, 298–305 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Gale NW, et al. Ephrin-B2 selectively marks arterial vessels and neovascularization sites in the adult, with expression in both endothelial and smooth-muscle cells. Dev Biol 230, 151–160 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kim YH, et al. Artery and vein size is balanced by Notch and ephrin B2/EphB4 during angiogenesis. Development 135, 3755–3764 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Leung DW, Cachianes G, Kuang WJ, Goeddel DV & Ferrara N Vascular endothelial growth factor is a secreted angiogenic mitogen. Science 246, 1306–1309 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Keck PJ, et al. Vascular permeability factor, an endothelial cell mitogen related to PDGF. Science 246, 1309–1312 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Peichev M, et al. Expression of VEGFR-2 and AC133 by circulating human CD34(+) cells identifies a population of functional endothelial precursors. Blood 95, 952–958 (2000). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Gill M, et al. Vascular trauma induces rapid but transient mobilization of VEGFR2(+)AC133(+) endothelial precursor cells. Circ Res 88, 167–174 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lin AW, et al. The Temporomandibular Joint of the Domestic Dog (Canis lupus familiaris) in Health and Disease. J Comp Pathol 161, 55–67 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Dones M Condylar hyperplasia: report of a case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 12, 1433–1435 (1959). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kessel LJ Condylar hyperplasia--case report. Br J Oral Surg 7, 124–126 (1969). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Bharathi SC, Senthilnathan S, Kumar LD, Mohan AC & Taranath M Unilateral condylar hyperplasia: A case report and review of literature. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 4, 67–70 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Tripathi T, Srivastava D, Neha & Rai P Differential diagnosis and treatment of condylar hyperplasia. J Clin Orthod 53, 29–38 (2019). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Lamy S, Lachambre MP, Lord-Dufour S & Beliveau R Propranolol suppresses angiogenesis in vitro: inhibition of proliferation, migration, and differentiation of endothelial cells. Vascul Pharmacol 53, 200–208 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Zou HX, Jia J, Zhang WF, Sun ZJ & Zhao YF Propranolol inhibits endothelial progenitor cell homing: a possible treatment mechanism of infantile hemangioma. Cardiovasc Pathol 22, 203–210 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Rotter A & de Oliveira ZNP Infantile hemangioma: pathogenesis and mechanisms of action of propranolol. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 15, 1185–1190 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kermack KA The origin of mammals and the evolution of the temporomandibular joint. Proc R Soc Med 65, 389–392 (1972). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Vapniarsky N, et al. The Yucatan Minipig Temporomandibular Joint Disc Structure-Function Relationships Support Its Suitability for Human Comparative Studies. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 23, 700–709 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Almarza AJ, et al. Preclinical Animal Models for Temporomandibular Joint Tissue Engineering. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 24, 171–178 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Jing Y, et al. Vital Roles of beta-catenin in Trans-differentiation of Chondrocytes to Bone Cells. Int J Biol Sci 14, 1–9 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Delaire J [The evolution of the lower jaw and the jaw joint, from reptiles to man]. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 99, 3–10 (1998). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Ji Q, Luo ZX, Zhang X, Yuan CX & Xu L Evolutionary development of the middle ear in Mesozoic therian mammals. Science 326, 278–281 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Lautenschlager S, Gill PG, Luo ZX, Fagan MJ & Rayfield EJ The role of miniaturization in the evolution of the mammalian jaw and middle ear. Nature 561, 533–537 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Anthwal N, Joshi L & Tucker AS Evolution of the mammalian middle ear and jaw: adaptations and novel structures. J Anat 222, 147–160 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Mair KH, et al. The porcine innate immune system: an update. Dev Comp Immunol 45, 321–343 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Duan X, Bradbury SR, Olsen BR & Berendsen AD VEGF stimulates intramembranous bone formation during craniofacial skeletal development. Matrix Biol 52–54, 127–140 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Berendsen AD & Olsen BR Bone development. Bone 80, 14–18 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Ten Cate AR Oral histology : development, structure, and function, (Mosby, St. Louis, 1980). [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Durkin JF, Heeley JD & Irving JT The cartilage of the mandibular condyle. Oral Sci Rev 2, 29–99 (1973). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Schneider RA Regulation of Jaw Length During Development, Disease, and Evolution. Curr Top Dev Biol 115, 271–298 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Koyama E, et al. A distinct cohort of progenitor cells participates in synovial joint and articular cartilage formation during mouse limb skeletogenesis. Dev Biol 316, 62–73 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Wang Y, et al. Tissue interaction is required for glenoid fossa development during temporomandibular joint formation. Dev Dyn 240, 2466–2473 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Huang GTJ & Thesleff I Stem cells in craniofacial development and regeneration, (Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, N.J., 2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Gu S, et al. BMPRIA mediated signaling is essential for temporomandibular joint development in mice. PLoS One 9, e101000 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Purcell P, et al. Spry1 and spry2 are essential for development of the temporomandibular joint. J Dent Res 91, 387–393 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Shibata S & Yokohama-Tamaki T An in situ hybridization study of Runx2, Osterix, and Sox9 in the anlagen of mouse mandibular condylar cartilage in the early stages of embryogenesis. J Anat 213, 274–283 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Carvalho de Moraes LO, et al. Development of synovial membrane in the temporomandibular joint of the human fetus. Eur J Histochem 59, 2569 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Miyake T, Cameron AM & Hall BK Stage-specific expression patterns of alkaline phosphatase during development of the first arch skeleton in inbred C57BL/6 mouse embryos. J Anat 190 (Pt 2), 239–260 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Purcell P, et al. Temporomandibular joint formation requires two distinct hedgehog-dependent steps. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106, 18297–18302 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Shibukawa Y, et al. Temporomandibular joint formation and condyle growth require Indian hedgehog signaling. Dev Dyn 236, 426–434 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Long F & Linsenmayer TF Regulation of growth region cartilage proliferation and differentiation by perichondrium. Development 125, 1067–1073 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Kronenberg HM The role of the perichondrium in fetal bone development. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1116, 59–64 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Colnot C, Lu C, Hu D & Helms JA Distinguishing the contributions of the perichondrium, cartilage, and vascular endothelium to skeletal development. Dev Biol 269, 55–69 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Kobayashi T & Kronenberg HM Overview of skeletal development. Methods Mol Biol 1130, 3–12 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Ono N, Ono W, Nagasawa T & Kronenberg HM A subset of chondrogenic cells provides early mesenchymal progenitors in growing bones. Nat Cell Biol 16, 1157–1167 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Pacifici M, et al. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of synovial joint and articular cartilage formation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1068, 74–86 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Decker RS, Koyama E & Pacifici M Genesis and morphogenesis of limb synovial joints and articular cartilage. Matrix Biol 39, 5–10 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental

RESOURCES