Skip to main content
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders logoLink to BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
. 2020 Jul 25;20:347. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01627-6

Dose-response association between physical activity and clustering of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors among 26,093 Chinese adults

Rui Shi 1, Yamei Cai 2, Rui Qin 2, Yang Yan 3,, Dahai Yu 4
PMCID: PMC7382860  PMID: 32711476

Abstract

Background

There is uncertain evidence in the dose-response association between overall physical activity levels and clustering of cardiovascular diseases modifiable risk factors (CVDMRF) in Chinese adults. This study examined the hypothesis whether inverse dose-response association between overall physical activity levels and clustering of CVDMRF in Chinese adults exist.

Methods

Twenty-six thousand ninety-three Chinese adult participants were recruited by two independent surveys in Nanjing and Hefei during 2011 to 2013, from random selected households provided smoking, glucose, lipids, anthropometric, and blood pressure measurements. Logistic regression model was applied to examine the dose-response association between overall physical activity (measured by metabolic equivalent task (MET)- minutes per week) and having ≥1, ≥2, and ≥ 3 CVDMRF (dyslipidemia, hypertension, diabetes, cigarette smoking, and overweight).

Results

An inverse linear dose-response relationship between physical activity and clustering of CVDMRF was identified, as increased physical activity levels are associated with lower odds of having clustering of CVDMRF. The adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of having ≥1, ≥2, and ≥ 3 CVRF for moderate physical activity group and high physical activity group was 0.88 (0.79 to 0.98) and 0.88 (0.79 to 0.99), 0.85 (0.78 to 0.92) and 0.85 (0.78 to 0.92), 0.84 (0.76 to 0.91) and 0.81 (0.74 to 0.89), respectively, with low physical activity as reference group.

Conclusions

Among Chinese adults, physical activity level inversely associates with clustering of CVDMRF, especially in those aged 35–54 years. Health promotion including improve physical activity should be advocated. The potential role of physical activity in the clustering of CVDMRF warrants further validation.

Keywords: Physical activity, Cardiovascular diseases, Cardiovascular risk factor

Background

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) as the leading death cause has affected 290 million Chinese people with CVD and caused 3.5 million annual death [1]. It is also projected that annual cardiovascular events will increase by more than 50% by 2030 in China based on the current the aging population and the growth of population [2]. Different from the developed countries in which the prevalence of some CVD modifiable risk factors has decreased, the prevalence of CVD modifiable risk factors has increased in developing countries. In particular, major modifiable risk factors: current smoking, overweight, diabetes, hypertension and dyslipdaemia have been found very common in Chinese adults [3]. For example, it has been estimated that 80.5, 45.9, and 17.2% of Chinese adults had ≥1, ≥2, and ≥ 3 above CVD modifiable risk factors [3].

Emerging evidence suggests physical activity may be relevant to circulating metabolites, including lipoproteins, lipids, and glucose, which have been associated with risk of CVD [4, 5]. However, few studies have addressed the association between physical activity and clustering of CVD modifiable risk factors, particularly in Chinese population. The goal of this study was to quantify the dose-response association between physical activity level and having a clustering of 1 or more, 2 or more, and 3 or more of CVD modifiable risk factors: dyslipidemia, hypertension, diabetes, current smoking, and overweight in Chinese adults.

Methods

Data setting

Two independent surveys were implemented in two Chinese places: Nanjing and Hefei [6]. The Nanjing Community Cardiovascular Risk Survey was processed by random cluster sampling [7], between 2011 and 2013, among adults resident in 6 communities of Nanjing, the capital city of Jiangsu Province in China. In every Nanjing community, one township or street district was chosen at random. Six thousand four hundred forty-five households in the chosen town or street were incorporated with only one adult aged 20 years and over sampled from every household, without replacement. Five thousand eight hundred twenty-four participants completed their clinical examination and survey (response rate: 90%). The Hefei Community Cardiovascular Risk Survey was also implemented by a random cluster sampling [6], between 2012 and 2013 among the adults residents in 10 rural areas of Hefei, the capital city of Anhui Province in China. In every rural area of Hefei, one township was randomly chosen. Twenty-two thousand thirty-two households in the chosen rural town were all incorporated with only one adult aged 20 years and over sampled from every household, without replacement. Twenty thousand two hundred sixty-nine participants completed their clinical examination and survey (response rate: 92%). Ethics approval of this study was acquired from the Institutional Review Board of Jiangsu Province Hospital on Integration of Chinese and Western Medicine (approval number 11–006). Signed, Informed consent was obtained from all study participants.

Clinical measurements

Both in Nanjing and Hefei surveys, research questionnaires were completed by trained research staff through face-to-face interviews. Question items covered age, gender, race, smoking status, and known diabetes. Participants who reported having smoked ≥100 cigarettes during their lifetime were classified as current smokers if they answered affirmatively to the question, “Do you smoke cigarettes now?” [3].

Both in Nanjing and Hefei surveys, body measurements and blood pressure measures were taken three times on the same day by a standardized methodology in the local clinical center and the mean of the two closest recordings was recorded as the final measurement. Body measurements including weight, height and waist circumference were measured by using a vertical weight scale and metric scale. Study participants’ weight were measured to the nearest 10th of a kilogram with wearing light indoor clothing without shoes. Study participants’ height was measured to the nearest 10th of a centimeter without wearing shoes. Both in Nanjing and Hefei surveys, above measurements were made by trained observers who were all asked to attend a training session to learn the standardized protocol of measurement techniques [8]. Study participants’ body mass index was calculated by their body weight (unit: kg) divided by the square of their height (unit: meter). Study participants with BMI ≥25 kg/m2 was defined as overweight [9].

Blood samples were collected for all participants after an overnight fasting for at least 10 h by trained nurse. The fasting time was verified prior to collecting the blood specimen. Participants who had not fasted for at least 10 h did not have their blood drawn.

Plasma samples for measuring glucose were collected using vacuum blood collection tubes containing anticoagulant sodium fluoride and the serum samples for measuring lipid profile and creatinine were collected using vacuum blood collection tubes not containing sodium fluoride. Fasting blood specimens collected in Nanjing were processed at the examination center (Nanjing) for urban population and fasting blood specimens collected in Hefei rural population were shipped by air to Nanjing examination centre. All specimens were stored at − 70 °C until laboratory assays were performed. Plasma glucose, serum creatinine, and serum lipid levels were measured by automated analyser (Olympus AU600 autoanalyser (Olympus Optical, Tokyo, Japan)). Participants who currently accepting anti-hypertensive treatment or having a 140 mmHg and over of a mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) and/or a 90 mmHg and over of mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were defined as having hypertension [10, 11]. Dyslipidemia was defined as currently accepting lipid-lowering therapy or having ≥1 of the higher lipid profile measurements as:

total cholesterol ≥5.2 mmol/L, triglycerides ≥1.7 mmol/L, HDL cholesterol < 1.0 mmol/L, or LDL cholesterol ≥3.4 mmol/L [12]. Participants currently accepting anti-diabetic therapies (insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents) or having a high measurement of fasting glucose (fasting plasma glucose level ≥ 7.0 mmol/L) was defined as having diabetes [13].

Physical activity measurements

International Physical Activity Questionnaire was used to collect physical activity information on household, transport, and job, as well as those on leisure-time, sports and recreation. Information about ≥10 min specific activities by the intensity, daily duration, and total weekdays during the prior week was acquired from participants [14]. Metabolic equivalent task (MET)- minutes every week (Met Score) were generated from the raw data. Met Score was also grouped into 3 levels: low physical activity group (who having < 600 MET-min/week), moderate physical activity group (who having 600–3000 MET-min/week) and high physical activity group (who having ≥3000 MET-min/week) [15]. The MET Score was transformed to its square root due to the non-normality of distribution.

Statistical analysis

The median and interquartile range was presented for continuous variables. Transformed Met Score (square root of Met Score) were compared by t test. Categorical variables were presented as count and percentages, and their difference across categories were examined by Chi-square test. Multivariable Logistic regression model was applied to assess the association between the transformed Met Score and odds of having ≥1, ≥2, and ≥ 3 major CVD modifiable risk factors by i) quantifying the odds ratio (OR) by increase of 1 standard deviation (SD) of transformed Met Score; ii) quantifying the OR by comparing the physical activity moderate and high level with the low level. Dose-response relationship between the transformed Met Score and odds of having ≥1, ≥2, and ≥ 3 major CVD modifiable risk factors was also examined by natural cubic spline model.

All statistical analyses were processed using STATA MP 15.0. All P-values were estimated by two-tailed tests and a P-value < 0.05 was taken as significance level.

Results

The characteristics of study participants in Nanjing survey sample, Hefei survey sample and the pooled survey samples are presented in Table 1. The prevalence of current smoking, overweight, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes was 24.0, 44.2, 50.0, 44.0 and 8.0% in the pooled survey sample, respectively. The prevalence of each CVRF above was 28.0, 40.2, 44.4, 38.8, and 8.1% in Nanjing survey sample and 23.3, 45.3, 51.6, 45.5 and 9.0% in Hefei sample, respectively. The prevalence of having ≥1, ≥2 and ≥ 3 CVD modifiable risk factors was 83.6, 54.9 and 25.7% in the pooled survey sample, respectively. The prevalence of having ≥1, ≥2 and ≥ 3 CVD modifiable risk factors was higher in Hefei survey sample comparing with Nanjing sample, as 84.5, 56.4, and 26.8% in Hefei survey sample and 80.6, 50.0 and 21.9% in Nanjing survey sample, respectively.

Table 1.

Characteristics of study participants

Characteristics Survey-1 (Nanjing) Survey-2 (Hefei) Pooled data
Participants, n 5824 20,269 26,093
Age, years 52.0 (43.0 to 59.0) 51.0 (43.0 to 58.0) 51.0 (43.0 to 58.0)
Women, n (%) 3278 (56.3) 11,905 (58.7) 15,183 (58.2)
Current smoking, n (%) 1571 (28.0) 4687 (23.3) 6258 (24.0)
Hypertension, n (%) 2259 (38.8) 9228 (45.5) 11,487 (44.0)
Type 2 diabetes, n (%) 472 (8.1) 1832 (9.0) 2304 (8.8)
Body mass index, kg/m2 23.6 (21.4 to 26.1) 24.1 (21.8 to 26.5) 24.0 (22.1 to 26.8)
Waist circumference, cm 80.0 (73.3 to 87.0) 81.6 (74.3 to 88.7) 81.3 (74.0 to 88.4)
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg 128 (116 to 143) 132 (120 to 148) 131 (119 to 147)
Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg 80.5 (73.5 to 88.5) 82.5 (75.0 to 90.5) 82.0 (75.0 to 90.0)
Fasting glucose, mmol/L 5.4 (4.9 to 5.9) 5.3 (4.8 to 5.2) 5.3 (4.8 to 5.8)
Triglyceride, mmol/L 1.2 (0.8 to 1.7) 1.3 (0.9 to 1.8) 1.2 (0.9 to 1.8)
Total cholesterol, mmol/L 4.4 (3.9 to 4.9) 4.6 (4.0 to 5.2) 4.5 (4.0 to 5.1)
High density lipoprotein cholesterol, mmol/L 1.3 (1.1 to 1.5) 1.3 (1.1 to 1.5) 1.3 (1.1 to 1.5)
Low density lipoprotein cholesterol, mmol/L 2.4 (2.0 to 2.9) 2.6 (2.2 to 3.1) 2.5 (2.1 to 3.0)
Dyslipidaemia, n (%) 2583 (44.4) 10,463 (51.6) 13,046 (50.0)
Overweight, n (%) 2341 (40.2) 9187 (45.3) 11,528 (44.2)
Having ≥1 CVD modifiable risk factor, n (%) 4692 (80.6) 17,118 (84.5) 21,810 (83.6)
Having ≥2 CVD modifiable risk factors, n (%) 2914 (50.0) 11,421 (56.4) 14,335 (54.9)
Having ≥3 CVD modifiable risk factors, n (%) 1275 (21.9) 5422 (26.8) 6697 (25.7)

Continuous variables were presented as median (interquartile range); categorical variables were presented as number (percentage)

The distribution of physical activity levels (transformed Met Score) was presented in Table 2 by the status of clustering of CVD modifiable risk factors. Participants with clustering of CVD modifiable risk factors was more likely to have lower physical activity comparing with those without clustering of CVD modifiable risk factors, as the median (IQR) of transformed Met Score was 48.9 (33.8 to 70.2), 47.8 (33.6 to 70.7) and 46.2 (32.9 to 69.1) among those with ≥1, ≥2 and ≥ 3 CVRF; 50.0 (34.1 to 71.9), 50.2 (34.1 to 72.0), and 50.1 (34.2 to 72.0) among those without ≥1, ≥2 and ≥ 3 CVD modifiable risk factors, respectively. Similarly, significantly lower physical activity was found among participants with clustering of CVD modifiable risk factors comparing with those without clustering of CVD modifiable risk factors in each survey sample and by sex. In the age-stratified analysis, the significant difference was found in age group 35–44 years and 45–54 years.

Table 2.

Distribution of physical activity levels by cardiovascular disease risk factors clustering status among Chinese adults

Having ≥1 CVD modifiable risk factor P Having ≥2 CVD modifiable risk factors P Having ≥3 CVD modifiable risk factors P
Met Score, median (Inter-quartile range) Yes No Yes No Yes No
Overall 48.9 (33.8 to 70.2) 50.0 (34.1 to 71.9) 0.017 47.8 (33.6 to 70.7) 50.2 (34.1 to 72.0) 0.003 46.2 (32.9 to 69.1) 50.1 (34.2 to 72.0) < 0.001
Survey site
 Nanjing 44.2 (29.2 to 68.0) 47.1 (31.0 to 69.3) 0.028 43.5 (28.5 to 67.1) 45.7 (30.5 to 69.2) 0.013 43.0 (27.6 to 64.6) 45.4 (30.2 to 69.3) 0.003
 Hefei 49.6 (35.3 to 71.9) 51.3 (35.5 to 72.2) 0.043 50.2 (35.4 to 71.3) 51.2 (35.5 to 72.7) 0.002 50.0 (34.5 to 69.8) 51.4 (35.5 to 72.7) < 0.001
Sex
 Male 48.3 (32.5 to 72.7) 51.4 (33.5 to 76.1) 0.010 47.0 (32.3 to 71.9) 50.0 (33.2 to 74.9) 0.002 46.1 (31.5 to 70.2) 50.0 (33.3 to 74.4) 0.002
 Female 49.6 (34.2 to 68.2) 50.0 (43.6 to 71.0) 0.183 48.3 (34.9 to 69.2) 51.4 (34.6 to 71.0) 0.012 48.1 (34.6 to 68.2) 50.6 (34.7 to 71.0) 0.003
Age group
  < 35 years 46.6 (30.5 to 62.0) 47.3 (33.4 to 68.9) 0.098 44.4 (25.8 to 62.2) 47.3 (35.5 to 86.0) 0.072 48.3 (17.8 to 63.4) 47.3 (32.9 to 93.1) 0.098
 35–44 years 48.8 (32.4 to 73.2) 49.3 (33.5 to 75.3) 0.047 47.9 (31.3 to 73.2) 49.3 (33.5 to 75.1) 0.016 46.7 (30.0 to 73.6) 49.6 (33.2 to 74.8) 0.037
 45–54 years 48.5 (34.5 to 72.7) 51.0 (35.5 to 73.5) 0.036 47.3 (34.8 to 72.9) 50.8 (34.5 to 73.4) 0.026 49.4 (33.4 to 71.6) 51.4 (35.1 to 73.9) 0.021
 55–64 years 49.1 (33.3 to 67.9) 50.0 (34.4 to 68.7) 0.056 50.0 (32.4 to 67.3) 50.3 (34.3 to 69.1) 0.072 49.1 (32.2 to 67.5) 50.2 (34.6 to 69.4) 0.063
 65–74 years 49.5 (34.0 to 65.1) 50.0 (32.9 to 67.7) 0.062 48.9 (33.9 to 65.1) 49.8 (34.0 to 65.8) 0.083 49.1 (33.7 to 65.4) 50.4 (35.3 to 64.9) 0.078
  ≥ 75 years 49.7 (29.4 to 68.1) 50.1 (43.7 to 89.6) 0.056 48.9 (27.9 to 68.1) 49.8 (36.3 to 78.4) 0.076 46.2 (24.5 to 53.9) 49.2 (39.5 to 79.2) 0.061

The dose-response association between transformed Met Score and adjusted odds ratio (OR) of having ≥1, ≥2 and ≥ 3 CVD modifiable risk factors was presented in Fig. 1. Linear dose-response relationships were found in overall, by survey, sex, and age groups (non-linear test: all P-value> 0.05).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Adjusted dose-response relationship between Met Scores and odds of having ≥1, 2, 3 cardiovascular disease risk factors among Chinese adults. In the pooled dataset, sex, age group and survey site were adjusted; in the survey site specific dataset, sex and age group were adjusted

As presented in Table 3, the adjusted OR of having ≥1, ≥2 and ≥ 3 CVD modifiable risk factors by per SD increase was 0.98 (0.94 to 1.01), 0.96 (0.93 to 0.99) and 0.93 (0.90 to 0.96), respectively. In the site-specific analysis, the significant adjusted OR of having ≥1, ≥2, and ≥ 3 CVD modifiable risk factors was found in Nanjing survey, Hefei survey and both surveys. In the sex-specific analysis, adjusted OR of having ≥1 CVD modifiable risk factors was insignificant in both gender; the adjusted OR of having ≥2, and ≥ 3 CVD modifiable risk factors were both significant in both genders. In the age-stratified analysis, the significant adjusted OR of having ≥1 CVD modifiable risk factors was found in those aged 35–44 years; the adjusted OR of having ≥2, and ≥ 3 CVD modifiable risk factors was significant in those aged 35–44 years and those aged 45–54 years, respectively.

Table 3.

Adjusted association between physical activity scores (per SD increase) and odds of having ≥1, 2, 3 CVD modifiable risk factor among Chinese adults

Adjusted Odds ratio (95 confidence interval)
Having ≥1 CVD modifiable risk factor Having ≥2 CVD modifiable risk factors Having ≥3 CVD modifiable risk factors
Overall a 0.98 (0.94 to 1.01) 0.96 (0.93 to 0.99) 0.93 (0.90 to 0.96)
Survey site b
 Nanjing 0.92 (0.86 to 0.99) 0.95 (0.90 to 1.01) 0.90 (0.83 to 0.96)
 Hefei 0.98 (0.94 to 1.03) 0.96 (0.93 to 0.99) 0.93 (0.89 to 0.97)
Sex c
 Male 0.94 (0.87 to 1.01) 0.93 (0.89 to 0.97) 0.90 (0.86 to 0.94)
 Female 0.98 (0.93 to 1.03) 0.96 (0.93 to 0.99) 0.94 (0.90 to 0.99)
Age group d
  < 35 years 0.99 (0.97 to 1.02) 0.92 (0.88 to 0.96) 0.72 (0.33 to 1.57)
 35–44 years 0.97 (0.95 to 0.99) 0.97 (0.95 to 0.99) 0.93 (0.87 to 0.99)
 45–54 years 1.00 (0.97 to 1.03) 0.96 (0.94 to 0.98) 0.92 (0.87 to 0.98)
 55–64 years 0.95 (0.90 to 1.00) 0.98 (0.96 to 1.00) 0.97 (0.91 to 1.03)
 65–74 years 0.95 (0.89 to 1.01) 0.99 (0.98 to 1.00) 0.95 (0.85 to 1.06)
  ≥ 75 years 0.68 (0.33 to 1.03) 0.89 (0.75 to 1.03) 0.54 (0.07 to 1.02)

a indicates sex, survey site, and age group were adjusted; b indicates sex and age group were adjusted; c indicates survey site and age group were adjusted; d indicates sex and survey site were adjusted

The odds ratio was estimated by per SD (28 transformed Met Score) increase

In Table 4, the adjusted OR of having ≥1, ≥2, and ≥ 3 CVD modifiable risk factors for moderate physical activity group and high physical activity group was 0.88 (0.79 to 0.98) and 0.88 (0.79 to 0.99), 0.85 (0.78 to 0.92) and 0.85 (0.78 to 0.92), 0.84 (0.76 to 0.91) and 0.81 (0.74 to 0.89), respectively, with low physical activity as reference group. In the stratified analysis, the significant adjusted OR of having ≥2 and ≥ 3 CVD modifiable risk factors was found for moderate physical activity group and high physical activity group in each survey sample, and 35–44 and 45–54 age groups, respectively.

Table 4.

Adjusted association between physical activity scores category and odds of having ≥1, 2, 3 CVD modifiable risk factors among Chinese adults

Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% confidence interval)
Having ≥1 CVD modifiable risk factor Having ≥2 CVD modifiable risk factors Having ≥3 CVD modifiable risk factors
Moderate physical activity High physical activity Moderate physical activity High physical activity Moderate physical activity High physical activity
Overall a 0.88 (0.79 to 0.98) 0.88 (0.79 to 0.99) 0.85 (0.78 to 0.92) 0.85 (0.78 to 0.92) 0.84 (0.76 to 0.91) 0.81 (0.74 to 0.89)
Survey site b
 Nanjing 0.83 (0.68 to 1.01) 0.79 (0.64 to 0.97) 0.75 (0.65 to 0.88) 0.71 (0.61 to 0.83) 0.71 (0.60 to 0.84) 0.65 (0.55 to 0.78)
 Hefei 0.88 (0.77 to 1.01) 0.89 (0.78 to 1.01) 0.87 (0.79 to 0.96) 0.88 (0.80 to 0.96) 0.87 (0.78 to 0.96) 0.84 (0.76 to 0.93)
Sex c
 Male 0.86 (0.78 to 0.96) 0.88 (0.73 to 1.03) 0.83 (0.63 to 1.02) 0.81 (0.72 to 0.91) 0.82 (0.60 to 1.04) 0.80 (0.73 to 0.87)
 Female 0.99 (0.87 to 1.13) 0.97 (0.85 to 1.11) 0.97 (0.87 to 1.09) 0.98 (0.87 to 1.09) 0.93 (0.81 to 1.06) 0.95 (0.83 to 1.09)
Age group d
  < 35 years 0.97 (0.30 to 3.09) 0.67 (0.19 to 2.30) 0.27 (0.08 to 0.84) 0.51 (0.16 to 1.61) 0.26 (0.06 to 1.12) 0.33 (0.08 to 1.41)
 35–44 years 0.77 (0.65 to 0.90) 0.81 (0.69 to 0.95) 0.69 (0.60 to 0.79) 0.70 (0.61 to 0.80) 0.71 (0.59 to 0.85) 0.69 (0.57 to 0.82)
 45–54 years 0.76 (0.62 to 0.95) 0.77 (0.62 to 0.95) 0.77 (0.67 to 0.89) 0.82 (0.71 to 0.95) 0.76 (0.65 to 0.88) 0.69 (0.59 to 0.81)
 55–64 years 0.92 (0.70 to 1.20) 0.96 (0.74 to 1.26) 0.98 (0.83 to 1.16) 0.96 (0.81 to 1.13) 0.87 (0.74 to 1.03) 0.90 (0.76 to 1.06)
 65–74 years 0.65 (0.41 to 1.03) 0.84 (0.54 to 1.32) 0.98 (0.76 to 1.28) 0.97 (0.75 to 1.27) 1.00 (0.78 to 1.29) 0.91 (0.70 to 1.17)
  ≥ 75 years 0.54 (0.09 to 3.62) 0.48 (0.09 to 2.54) 0.71 (0.21 to 2.38) 0.83 (0.25 to 2.76) 0.75 (0.22 to 2.56) 0.23 (0.06 to 0.95)

a indicates sex, survey site, and age group were adjusted; b indicates sex and age group were adjusted; c indicates survey site and age group were adjusted; d indicates sex and survey site were adjusted

Adjusted odds ratio was estimated with low physical activity as reference group

Discussion

Based on two independent surveys from two provinces in China, this study comprehensively examined the dose response associations of self-reported total physical activity and clustering of CVD modifiable risk factors among Chinese adults. Higher prevalence of clustering across CVD modifiable risk factors is associated with lower physical activity. The increase of the physical activity from < 600 MET-min/week to 600–3000 MET-min/week is associated with 12, 15 and 16% decreased odds of having ≥1, ≥2 and ≥ 3 CVD modifiable risk factors. Although prevalence of each CVD modifiable risk factors was different over two surveys, the consistently similar findings are revealed in each survey. Improving physical activity among younger persons before the impacts of chronic disease become largely irreversible, could help to improve life expectancy.

Physical activity and single CVD modifiable risk factors in Chinese population have been addressed in prior studies. For example, Lao et al. identified inverse dose-response association between leisure-time physical activity and diabetes risk as higher levels of leisure-time physical activity are associated with a lower risk of diabetes in Chinese people with impaired fasting glucose [16]. Yang et al. found that household physical activity was inversely associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes in among urban males in northern China [17]. Pang et al. reveals that higher physical activity is associated with lower concentration of atherogenic lipoprotein and cholesterol and lower levels of inflammation in Chinese population [18]. Li et al. found higher level physical activity is related to between glycemic control and insulin sensitivity in southern Chinese population [19]. Similar with these findings, we identified inverse linear dose-response relationship between higher total physical activity level and lower prevalence of having ≥1, ≥2 and ≥ 3 CVD modifiable risk factors among Chinese adults. Instead of measuring parts of daily physical activity (i.e. leisure-time physical activity, sedentary time, or household physical activity), the overall activity measurement incorporating all parts of daily physical activity were undertaken in this study. And instead of investigating the single CVD modifiable risk factors, this study focused on the clustering status of CVD modifiable risk factors, which would generally reflect the individual CVD health and potential future CVD risk. In this study, about 15% decreased prevalence of having ≥2 CVD risk factors might be avoided if the inactive individuals ((< 600 MET-min/week) improved their physical activity to moderate level (600–3000 MET-min/week).

In this study, we investigated the dose-response association between physical activity and clustering of CVD modifiable risk factors not only in the general population but also in the different age-stratified subpopulation. The significant inverse association (higher prevalence of clustering across CVD modifiable risk factors is associated with lower physical activity) was identified in people aged 35–44 years. Among people aged less than 35 years, the insignificant association might suggest that physical activity might not take a significant role in the early onset of clustering of CVD modifiable risk factors [20], which of course need further validation in the external young populations. Among people aged more than 55 years, the existing comorbidities might take a significant role of the clustering of CVD modifiable risk factors [21], which would attenuate the contribution of physical activity. Based on this study, the health promotion programs including improving general physical activities should be advocated in the Chinese population aged 35–54 by health policy makers.

Potential biological mechanism underlying the cardiovascular protective effects of physical activity against the clustering of CVD modifiable risk factors include some favorable modification effects in adiposity, insulin sensitivity, lipid profiles and systemic inflammation [16, 2224]. Experimental studies also revealed that physical activity helps to improve body muscle mass and stimulates the uptake of glucose in muscles [25, 26] and reduce triglycerides and ceramides and improve insulin sensitivity [27].

As the strength of this study, overall > 90% response rate was achieved by this study, which made the study sample well represent local populations. The high response rate was achieved by household investigation and face-to-face interview by trained research staff. The limitation of this study is the utilization of cross-sectional survey datasets, whereby physical activity measurements and CVD modifiable risk factors were evaluated at same time. Therefore, it is impossible to process causal inference between physical activity and clustering of CVD modifiable risk factors. Future studies within in prospective cohort data would be the next step in testing above associations. Some other confounders like comorbidities (like existing CVD) could also alter the association between physical activity and clustering of CVD modifiable risk factors. However, more comorbidities more not available in this study. Finally, future external replication studies with adjustment of potential comorbidities, alongside meta-analysis are warranted to better understanding whether physical activity does have the potential modification role in the clustering of CVD modifiable risk factors. Some other blood markers that could confound the findings of this study, like C-reactive protein were not accessible in this study and its confounding effect could not be addressed in this study. Instead of using International Physical Activity Questionnaire to assess physical activity, accelerometers or other wearables might be preferred in recent studies. Future replication studies using wearables to assess physical activity are warranted.

Conclusion

In conclusion, in Chinese adults, physical activity level inversely associates with clustering of CVD modifiable risk factors, especially in Chinese adults aged 35 to 54 years. Health promotion programme including improve physical activity level should be advocated. Physical activity has the potential modification role in the clustering of CVD modifiable risk factors that warrants further validation in the future prospective cohort studies.

Acknowledgements

We are also grateful to all the individuals who conducted the data collection and entry.

Abbreviations

CVD

Cardiovascular diseases

CVDMRF

Clustering of cardiovascular diseases modifiable risk factors

MET

Metabolic equivalent task

BMI

Body mass index

SBP

Systolic blood pressure

DBP

Diastolic blood pressure

OR

Odds ratio

CI

Confidence interval

Authors’ contributions

RS, YY, YC, and DY designed the study. RQ, YC, and DY collected the data. RS, YC and DY conducted the data analyses. RS, YC, RQ, YY and DY drafted the manuscript. RS, YY, YC, RQ and DY edited the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work received supports from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 81800299). The funder had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The data used and/or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval of this study was acquired from the Institutional Review Board of Jiangsu Province Hospital on Integration of Chinese and Western Medicine (approval number 11–006). Signed, Informed consent was obtained from all study participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Zhu J, Yu X, Zheng Y, Li J, Wang Y, Lin Y, He Z, Zhao W, Chen C, Qiu K, Wu J. Association of glucose-lowering medications with cardiovascular outcomes: an umbrella review and evidence map. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 2.Moran A, Gu D, Zhao D, Coxson P, Wang YC, Chen CS, Liu J, Cheng J, Bibbins-Domingo K, Shen YM, He J, Goldman L. Future cardiovascular disease in China: markov model and risk factor scenario projections from the coronary heart disease policy model-China. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010;3(3):243–252. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.910711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gu D, Gupta A, Muntner P, Hu S, Duan X, Chen J, Reynolds RF, Whelton PK, He J. Prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factor clustering among the adult population of China: results from the international collaborative study of cardiovascular disease in Asia (InterAsia) Circulation. 2005;112(5):658–665. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.515072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Qin L, Corpeleijn E, Jiang C, Thomas GN, Schooling CM, Zhang W, Cheng KK, Leung GM, Stolk RP, Lam TH. Physical activity, adiposity, and diabetes risk in middle-aged and older Chinese population: the Guangzhou biobank cohort study. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(11):2342–2348. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT, Lancet physical activity series working group Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):219–229. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yu L, Cai Y, Qin R, Zhao B, Li X. Association between triglyceride glucose index and abnormal liver function in both urban and rural Chinese adult populations: findings from two independent surveys. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98(50):e18265. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yu D, Chen T, Qin R, Cai Y, Jiang Z, Zhao Z, Simmons D. Association between lung capacity and abnormal glucose metabolism: findings from China and Australia. Clin Endocrinol. 2016;85(1):37–45. doi: 10.1111/cen.13006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yu D, Chen T, Cai Y, Zhao Z, Simmons D. Association between pulmonary function and renal function: findings from China and Australia. BMC Nephrol. 2017;18(1):143–017-0565-y. doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0565-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yu D, Yang W, Chen T, Cai Y, Zhao Z, Simmons D. Hypertriglyceridemic-waist is more predictive of abnormal liver and renal function in an Australian population than a Chinese population. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2018;12(5):438–444. doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2018.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, Jones DW, Materson BJ, Oparil S, Wright JT Jr, et al. The seventh report of the joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289(19):2560–72. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 11.1999 World Health Organization--International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension Guidelines sub-committee. Blood Press Suppl. 1999;1:9–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gu D, Reynolds K, Wu X, Chen J, Duan X, Reynolds RF, Whelton PK, He J, InterASIA collaborative group Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome and overweight among adults in China. Lancet. 2005;365(9468):1398–1405. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66375-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yu D, Huang J, Hu D, Chen J, Cao J, Li J. Is an appropriate cutoff of hypertriglyceridemic waist designated for type 2 diabetes among Chinese adults? Clin Nutr. 2010;29(2):192–198. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lear SA, Hu W, Rangarajan S, Gasevic D, Leong D, Iqbal R, Casanova A, Swaminathan S, Anjana RM, Kumar R, Rosengren A, Wei L, Yang W, Chuangshi W, Huaxing L, Nair S, Diaz R, Swidon H, Gupta R, Mohammadifard N, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Oguz A, Zatonska K, Seron P, Avezum A, Poirier P, Teo K, Yusuf S. The effect of physical activity on mortality and cardiovascular disease in 130 000 people from 17 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: the PURE study. Lancet. 2017;390(10113):2643–2654. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31634-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Oyeyemi AL, Moss SJ, Monyeki MA, Kruger HS. Measurement of physical activity in urban and rural south African adults: a comparison of two self-report methods. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):1004. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3693-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lao XQ, Deng HB, Liu X, Chan TC, Zhang Z, Chang LY, Yeoh EK, Tam T, Wong MCS, Thomas GN. Increased leisure-time physical activity associated with lower onset of diabetes in 44 828 adults with impaired fasting glucose: a population-based prospective cohort study. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(14):895–900. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yang J, Zhang YL, Ye J, Guo Q, Sun YN, Zeng Q. Association between household physical activity level and type 2 diabetes among urban males in northern China. Public Health. 2018;163:113–120. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pang Y, Kartsonaki C, Du H, Millwood IY, Guo Y, Chen Y, Bian Z, Yang L, Walters R, Bragg F, Lv J, Yu C, Chen J, Peto R, Clarke R, Collins R, Bennett DA, Li L, Holmes MV, Chen Z. Physical activity, sedentary leisure time, circulating metabolic markers, and risk of major vascular diseases. Circ Genom Precis Med. 2019;12(9):386–396. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.118.002527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li L, Yin X, Yu D, Li H. Impact of physical activity on glycemic control and insulin resistance: a study of community-dwelling diabetic patients in eastern China. Intern Med. 2016;55(9):1055–1060. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.55.4943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rees R, Kavanagh J, Harden A, Shepherd J, Brunton G, Oliver S, Oakley A. Young people and physical activity: a systematic review matching their views to effective interventions. Health Educ Res. 2006;21(6):806–825. doi: 10.1093/her/cyl120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.McPhee JS, French DP, Jackson D, Nazroo J, Pendleton N, Degens H. Physical activity in older age: perspectives for healthy ageing and frailty. Biogerontology. 2016;17(3):567–580. doi: 10.1007/s10522-016-9641-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Panagiotakos DB, Pitsavos C, Chrysohoou C, Kavouras S, Stefanadis C. ATTICA study: the associations between leisure-time physical activity and inflammatory and coagulation markers related to cardiovascular disease: the ATTICA study. Prev Med. 2005;40(4):432–437. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vuori IM. Health benefits of physical activity with special reference to interaction with diet. Public Health Nutr. 2001;4(2B):517–528. doi: 10.1079/PHN2001137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bassuk SS, Manson JE. Epidemiological evidence for the role of physical activity in reducing risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2005;99(3):1193–1204. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00160.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Richter EA, Hargreaves M. Exercise, GLUT4, and skeletal muscle glucose uptake. Physiol Rev. 2013;93(3):993–1017. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00038.2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cartee GD. Roles of TBC1D1 and TBC1D4 in insulin- and exercise-stimulated glucose transport of skeletal muscle. Diabetologia. 2015;58(1):19–30. doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3395-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bird SR, Hawley JA. Update on the effects of physical activity on insulin sensitivity in humans. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2017;2(1):e000143. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2016-000143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data used and/or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES