Abstract
Background & aims
Osteopontin, a multifunctional protein and inflammatory cytokine, is overexpressed in adipose tissue and liver in obesity and contributes to the induction of adipose tissue inflammation and non‐alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL). Studies performed in both mice and humans also point to a potential role for OPN in malignant transformation and tumour growth. To fully understand the role of OPN on the development of NAFL‐derived hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), we applied a non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)‐HCC mouse model on osteopontin‐deficient (Spp1−/−) mice analysing time points of NASH, fibrosis and HCC compared to wild‐type mice.
Methods
Two‐day‐old wild‐type and Spp1−/− mice received a low‐dose streptozotocin injection in order to induce diabetes, and were fed a high‐fat diet starting from week 4. Different cohorts of mice of both genotypes were sacrificed at 8, 12 and 19 weeks of age to evaluate the NASH, fibrosis and HCC phenotypes respectively.
Results
Spp1−/− animals showed enhanced hepatic lipid accumulation and aggravated NASH, as also increased hepatocellular apoptosis and accelerated fibrosis. The worse steatotic and fibrotic phenotypes observed in Spp1−/− mice might be driven by enhanced hepatic fatty acid influx through CD36 overexpression and by a pathological accumulation of specific diacylglycerol species during NAFL. Lack of osteopontin lowered systemic inflammation, prevented HCC progression to less differentiated tumours and improved overall survival.
Conclusions
Lack of osteopontin dissociates NASH‐fibrosis severity from overall survival and HCC malignant transformation in NAFLD, and is therefore a putative therapeutic target only for advanced chronic liver disease.
Keywords: acute‐on‐chronic liver failure, fibrosis, lipoapoptosis, metabolic syndrome, non‐alcoholic fatty liver
Key points.
Non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is currently driving the increase in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) prevalence worldwide
Dysregulated osteopontin (OPN) expression was associated with both obesity‐derived metabolic syndrome and HCC malignant development. However, a causal role for OPN in the pathogenesis of NAFLD and NAFLD‐derived HCC has yet to be established
In a mouse model of NAFLD‐derived HCC, OPN deficiency worsens hepatic steatosis and fibrosis, while improving systemic inflammation, overall survival and HCC outcomes
Therefore, we propose OPN as a putative therapeutic target in advanced, metabolic syndrome‐associated chronic liver diseases.
1. INTRODUCTION
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of liver cancer and the cause of approximately one million deaths yearly, with an alarming mortality rate of 94%. 1 Even though hepatitis B‐ (HBV) and C (HCV) virus infections are major risk factors for HCC, nutrition‐related diseases strongly promote the increase in HCC prevalence worldwide. This may be due to a chain of events starting with obesity, metabolic syndrome, type‐2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and fatty liver and potentially leading to non‐alcoholic liver steatohepatitis (NASH), liver fibrosis and finally HCC.
Non‐alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) will likely drive the increase in the incidence of HCC in the next decades. 2 Approximately 20% of patients manifesting simple steatosis further develop non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis. 3 NASH mainly occurs when the rate of liver non‐esterified fatty acids (NEFA) uptake surpass its capacity for esterification into triglycerides (TG). 4 , 5 NASH, consequently, is a driver for the development of fibrosis/cirrhosis and finally HCC. 6 Hence, the study of hepatocarcinogenesis on a metabolic syndrome background is gaining significant interest on the individual as well as public health level. However, underlying molecular mechanisms are far from being understood.
Osteopontin (OPN; gene Spp1) is a multifunctional protein highly expressed in activated macrophages and T‐cells, but also in hepatic stellate cells and hepatocytes. In obesity, OPN is vastly overexpressed in adipose tissue and induces infiltration and activation of macrophages generating a pro‐inflammatory environment, which crucially contributes to the onset of insulin resistance. 7 Hepatic OPN expression is up‐regulated in obesity 8 and various models of liver injury. 9 , 10 Furthermore, OPN is involved in the pathogenesis of NAFL associated with visceral obesity 11 and is a reliable biomarker for NASH/fibrosis in human non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). 12 , 13 Studies from others and our lab point to a pivotal role of OPN in obesity‐driven nutrition‐dependent diseases including high‐fat diet‐induced fatty liver 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 and thus suggest OPN as a treatment target.
Also downstream in the proposed order of events, OPN is highly upregulated in HCC and may even be evaluated as a potential therapeutic target in HCC. 18 , 19 However, a causal role of OPN in the pathogenesis of NASH and NASH‐derived HCC is still not defined.To elucidate the impact of OPN on the sequential development of NASH and derived HCC as occurring in metabolic syndrome we took advantage of a novel mouse model, 20 which starting from hyperglycaemia recapitulates the development of NAFL, NASH, fibrosis up to HCC. Applying this model to wild‐type (WT) and OPN‐deficient (Spp1 −/−) animals, we provide evidence for a Janus‐type role of OPN in various states of NASH‐HCC progression eventually resulting in enhanced NAFL, NASH and fibrosis but also more highly differentiated HCC and improved overall survival rate in Spp1 −/− mice.
2. METHODS
2.1. Animals
All experimental procedures were approved by the institutional animal care and use committees. Wild‐type and Osteopontin knock out (Spp1 −/−, B6.129S6(Cg)‐Spp1tm1Blh/J) mice on a C57BL/6J background were purchased from Charles River Laboratories Inc (Wilmington, Massachusetts, USA) and cohoused to minimize potential microbiome effects. Animals were treated as originally described by Fujii and colleagues 20 : two‐day‐old male newborns of both genotypes received a single subcutaneous STZ (Sigma, Missouri, USA) injection and were fed ad libitum a high‐fat diet (HFD, 60 kcal%, D12492; Research Diets, New Jersey, USA) starting at 4 weeks of age. 14‐hours fasting blood sugar (FBS) and body weight (BDW) were assessed in 4‐week‐old mice, and four FBS‐matched cohorts per genotype were generated (n = 15). Of each group, a representative subgroup of eight animals (FBS‐matched between genotypes) with lower alpha‐diversity was used for molecular analyses. Three‐to‐four littermate mice were housed together in wooden bedding–containing cages in the presence of cage enrichment in a light‐controlled and temperature‐controlled facility. At each time point, animals were overnight fasted (dark cycle) and later sacrificed by neck dislocation (light cycle). To assess in vivo proliferative potential of hepatocytes, all mice received an intraperitoneal injection of 5‐Bromo‐2′‐deoxyuridine (BrdU) (Sigma) 2 hours prior to sacrifice. Blood samples were drawn from the tail vein. Liver, subcutaneous and visceral white adipose tissue (SWAT, GWAT), kidney and small intestine samples were weighted, formalin‐fixed and/or snap‐frozen for further analyses.
2.2. Computed tomography
Liver X‐ray computed tomography (Siemens Inveon µCT, by Siemens Medical Solutions, Knoxville, USA) was used to non‐invasively measure number and volume of liver tumours in isoflurane‐anaesthetized mice. Before the µCT X‐ray examination each mouse was administered 100µL of CT contrast medium intravenously (ExiTron™ nano 6000, Miltenyi Biotec GmbH, Germany) to improve the soft tissue contrast. During the examination, the mice were placed on a heated bed and the vital parameters (body temperature and respiratory rate) were constantly monitored and a protective eye ointment was applied. After completion of the study, mice were sacrificed by neck dislocation and tissue samples were harvested as described above.
2.3. Histological analyses
Liver sections from the left lobe were formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded and were stained with haematoxylin/eosin, or Sirius red to assess liver fibrosis. Stained sections were evaluated by an expert pathologist, blind to genotype and study period, following the WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System. 21 Pancreas section was formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded and stained with haematoxylin/eosin to quantitatively evaluate Langerhans islets. Apoptosis was assessed by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase‐mediated dUTP‐biotin nick‐end labelling (TUNEL) staining using the TUNEL Andy Fluor™ 488 Apoptosis Detection Kit (Genecopoeia, Maryland, USA) following product instructions. Hepatocyte proliferation was assessed by BrdU immunostatining (Life Technologies, California, USA). Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33 342 and the proportion of TUNEL positive cells was quantified using ImageJ software (National Institute of Health) in an automated fashion. 22
2.4. Hepatic gene expression analyses
RNA was extracted from livers using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, California, USA). Complementary DNA obtained by reverse‐transcription was amplified using the appropriate, commercially available, gene expression assays (Life Technologies, California, USA). Gene expression was normalized to ubiquitin C (Ubc) and analysed by quantitative real‐time RT‐PCR on an ABI Prism 7000 cycler (Life Technologies, California, USA).
2.5. Western blotting
Liver samples were homogenized (Precellis 24, Bertin Technologies, France) in RIPA buffer and centrifuged. Supernatants were collected and assayed for protein concentration via BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA). Fifteen milligrams of protein/sample were separated by electrophoresis and blotted on nitrocellulose membranes (Bio‐Rad, California, USA), which were then blocked and incubated overnight with a primary antibody to OPN (AF808, R&D Systems, Minnesota, USA) 1:2000 diluted, and beta‐actin (A1978, Sigma, Missouri, USA) 1:10 000. After incubation with secondary antibodies, membranes were developed via the Fusion FX Western Blotting and Chemi Imaging (Vilber Lourmat, France), using the BM Chemiluminescence Blotting Substrate (Roche, Switzerland). Bands intensity was quantified using ImageJ software (National Institute of Health, Maryland, USA).
2.6. Plasma biochemistry
Blood glucose was measured using a One Touch Ultra glucose meter (LifeScan Inc, California, USA). Plasma alanine aminotransferase activity (ALT) was determined using the Vitros 5600 technology (Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, New Jersey, USA). Insulin was measured using an ultrasensitive mouse insulin ELISA (Mercodia AB, Sweden), serum amyloid P (SAP) by a commercially available ELISA kit (ALPCO Immunoassays, New Hampshire, USA). NEFA concentration was enzymatically assessed using a commercially available kit (Sigma, Missouri, USA).
2.7. Liver biochemistry
TG concentration was enzymatically assessed using a commercially available kit (Sigma, Missouri, USA), after chloroform‐methanol lipid extraction.
2.8. Targeted lipidomics of diacylglycerols and ceramides
Lipids were extracted, purified and analysed from frozen samples, using lipid chromatography mass spectrometry as adapted from Kumashiro et al. 23 Briefly, tissue was homogenized in 20 mM Tris/HCl, 1 mM EDTA 0.25 mM EGTA, pH 7.4, internal standards were added and samples were centrifuged for 1 h (100 000 g, 4°C). Lipid droplet, cytosol and membrane fractions were collected and lipids of each fraction were extracted, 24 followed by solid phase extraction (Sep Pak Diol Cartridges; Waters, Milford, MA, USA). The resulting lipid phase was dried and re‐suspended in methanol. Lipid analytes were separated using a Phenomenex Luna Omega column (1.6 µm 100A; Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) on an Infinity 1290 HPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and analysed by multiple reaction monitoring on a triplequadrupole mass spectrometer (Agilent 6495; Agilent Technologies), operated in the positive ion mode.
2.9. Statistics
Data are presented as mean ± SEM, and two groups compared by unpaired Student t‐test, with a significance level of <0.05. When more than two groups were compared, ANOVA with Tukey´s post hoc analyses were performed. For the survival observations, Kaplan‐Meyer analysis was applied.
3. RESULTS
3.1. Increased hepatic lipid uptake in NASH‐HCC OPN‐deficient mice promotes liver steatosis
Spp1 −/− and WT mice both developed comparable degrees of hyperglycaemia early after streptozotocin (STZ) treatment (plasma glucose 378 ± 16 mg/dL and 348 ± 20 mg/dL, respectively), indicating comparable efficiency of STZ administration. In line with that, the magnitude of STZ‐induced Langerhans islets damage was also comparable between genotypes (Figure S2B). Mice were sacrificed after 4 weeks of high fat diet (HFD) treatment to evaluate NAFL/NASH phenotype. Body weight as well of weights of GWAT and SWAT and plasma NEFA were similar (Figure S1). As shown by haematoxylin and eosin‐staining (Figure 1A) and the NAS score (Figure 1B) as well as hepatic TG quantification (Figure 1C), there was a significantly increased lipid accumulation in livers of Spp1 −/− mice. Accordingly, plasma alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was markedly elevated in the Spp1 −/− genotype (Figure 1D).
To evaluate the potential mechanisms of hepatic TG accumulation in Spp1 −/− animals, we measured the expression of genes playing a pivotal role in hepatic lipid homeostasis. Surprisingly, expression of Acaca was comparable between WT and Spp1 −/− mice, while Srebf1, Fasn and Scd1 where even significantly downregulated in the Spp1 −/− genotype (Figure 2A), indicating that the increased steatosis observed in Spp1 −/− mice cannot be explained by enhanced de novo lipogenesis (dnl). Also, expression levels of Ppara and Ppargc1a did not differ between the two groups (Figure 2C), while Dgat1 and Dgat2 enzymes were markedly downregulated in the Spp1 −/− group (Figure 2D). While the gene for the fatty acid transporter FATP4 (Slc27a4) was unchanged between genotypes (Figure 2B), gene expression of fatty acid translocase (CD36/FAT), a member of the class B scavenger receptor family essential for fatty acid (FA) uptake and lipid metabolism, was markedly increased in Spp1 −/− compared to WT animals (Figure 2B). Also, while inflammation was evaluated as comparable between groups by liver histology (Figure 1B), gene expression analyses showed a non‐significant and significant increase in expression of the main hepatic inflammatory markers Tnf and Ccl2 in Spp1 −/− mice respectively (Figure 2E). These data strongly emphasize that increased liver lipid uptake by overexpression of the CD36 FA translocase could contribute to the increased hepatic steatosis and inflammation in NASH‐HCC‐Spp1 −/− animals. These differences are observable only upon metabolic challenge (Figure S2A), meaning that the lack of OPN expression does not influence hepatic lipid metabolism at baseline.
3.2. Increased liver fibrosis in OPN‐deficient mice
Hepatic fibrosis evolves from NAFL/NASH on a metabolic syndrome background. In line with the worse steatotic phenotype of Spp1 −/− livers, markedly increased liver collagen deposition and myofibroblast activation were observed in Spp1 −/− mice as shown by Sirius Red staining and α‐SMA immunostaining respectively (Figure 3A,B). While WT mice just showed mild‐to‐moderate perisinusoidal and zone‐3 fibrosis, fibrosis was also extended to the portal and periportal area resulting in a higher fibrosis score in Spp1 −/− livers (Figure 3C). Only these livers also showed well‐defined bridging fibrosis and fibrotic septa (Figure 3A). In addition, a significant increase in gene expression of pro‐fibrogenic markers (Col1a1, Col 4a1, Timp1) was found in Spp1 −/− mice (Figure 3D). Of note, no changes in Tgfb expression were observed between genotypes and time points (Figure 7C). Hepatocellular apoptosis is implicated in the progression of fibrotic liver disease. 25 Since we and others have previously shown the anti‐apoptotic potential of OPN, 15 , 26 we hypothesized that enhanced apoptosis in OPN‐deficient livers could contribute to the increased hepatic fibrosis. Accordingly, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase‐mediated dUTP‐biotin nick‐end labelling (TUNEL) staining of liver sections revealed an increased proportion of apoptotic cells in OPN‐deficient mice compared to WT (Figure 4A,B). To assess hepatocyte proliferation, the number of hepatocytes in replicative S‐phase was evaluated by BrdU immunostaining. The percentage of proliferating hepatocytes was significantly higher in the livers of Spp1 −/− mice (Figure 4C,D), thus indicating a compensatory hyperproliferation of hepatocytes.
3.3. Accumulation of specific diacylglycerol species during NAFL in NASH‐HCC‐Spp1 −/− mice
Hepatic lipid accumulation in NASH‐HCC WT and Spp1 −/− mice seemed to rely on different mechanisms: increased lipogenesis in NASH‐HCC‐WT, but increased lipid uptake in NASH‐HCC‐Spp1 −/− (Figure 2). Looking for potential molecular drivers of the enhanced steatosis and fibrosis developed by NASH‐HCC‐Spp1 −/− mice, we performed targeted lipidomic analyses with emphasis on diacylglycerols (DAGs) and ceramides (CERs) of livers at the NAFL/NASH time point. Most of the DAG species were unchanged between genotypes. Membrane DAG 18:1/18:1 significantly increased in the absence of OPN (Figure 5C), as also DAG 16:0/18:2 in the lipid droplet compartment (Figure 5B). Membrane CER 24:0 and especially 22:0 decreased in Spp1 −/− livers (Figure 5F). No significant increase in other ceramide species was observed in Spp1 −/− when compared with WT mice (Figure 5D‐F). These data support the hypothesis of a putatively lipotoxic accumulation of specific DAG species driving the progression of hepatic disease in NASH‐HCC‐Spp1 −/− mice.
3.4. Osteopontin deficiency prevents HCC dedifferentiation
Already at 12 weeks of age, which corresponds to the liver fibrotic stage, 87.5% of OPN‐deficient animals developed liver tumours, which were histologically defined as HCCs (data not shown). In the WT group, just 1/8 of the mice showed HCCs at this time point (Figure 3E).
Mice were finally analysed at 19 weeks of age in order to evaluate hepatocellular carcinomas. CT scans showed widespread liver tumours in both WT and Spp1 −/− mice, but no significant differences in tumour size and number were observed (Figure 6A‐C). However, a higher degree of tumour dedifferentiation in WT compared to Spp1 −/− animals was shown in histologic analyses, as indicated by a significantly higher tumour grade in livers of wild‐type mice (Figure 6D). Expression levels of HCC markers revealed a marked overexpression of Afp in tumours from WT compared to Spp1 −/− animals. Moreover when compared with the adjacent non‐tumour tissue, its expression was upregulated only in WT but not in Spp1 −/− mice (Figure 6E). mRNA levels of Gpc‐3 followed the same trend but did not reach statistical significance (Figure 6F). The hampered HCC progression observed in OPN‐deficient mice and the specific overexpression of OPN at the HCC time point in livers of NASH‐HCC‐WT animals (Figure 7A,B) point toward a causative role for OPN in the dedifferentiation of HCCs harboured on a metabolic syndrome‐background.
Given the central role played by OPN in hepatic inflammation and carcinogenesis, 27 , 28 and since the immunological milieu significantly influences tumorigenesis, 29 we further analysed the expression pattern of the principal inflammatory markers during disease evolution. Tnfa and Ccl2 expression peaks at the fibrosis stage in Spp1 −/− livers, decreasing again later at the HCC time point (Figure 7C). Of note, the expression level of the same genes increases over time in livers of WT mice and peaks at the HCC stage (Figure 7C). The expression pattern of the pan‐macrophage marker Emr1 follows the same trends, indicating altered macrophage recruitment in livers of Spp1 −/− compared to WT NASH‐HCC mice (Figure 7C). Furthermore, we measured early and transient upregulation of both specific pro‐inflammatory and anti‐inflammatory macrophage markers (Itgax and Mrc1, respectively) in OPN‐deficient livers. Only Mrc1, an M2‐like macrophage marker, is significantly overexpressed at the HCC stage in WT livers (Figure 7C). These data strongly suggest that the lack of OPN hampers HCC progression and dedifferentiation by modulating the hepatic inflammatory kinetics.
3.5. Osteopontin deficiency reduces liver‐related mortality
As described earlier, NASH‐HCC mice started to die after week 11, which corresponds to the liver pre‐fibrotic/fibrotic stage. 30 In the present study, the mortality after 19 weeks in the WT group was 30% and significantly higher than in Spp1 −/− mice (14%; P = .0085) (Figure 8A). All dropouts showed symptoms of hepatic toxicity, such as microvesicular steatosis (Figure S3) indicating acute‐on‐chronic liver failure (ACLF) as described in patients with chronic liver disease. 31 Mortality in clinical ACLF correlates with the magnitude of systemic inflammation, 31 which was significantly enhanced also in NASH‐HCC‐WT mice as shown by increased serum amyloid P (SAP) levels (Figure 8B). Hence, OPN promotes a systemic pro‐inflammatory milieu, which significantly reduces survival in non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease.
3.6. The worse liver condition in OPN‐deficient mice is the consequence of a better overall metabolic homeostasis
NAFLD in metabolic syndrome is related to systemic metabolic dysregulations. We wanted, therefore, to clarify the role of OPN on metabolic homeostasis. At variance with Spp1−/− mice, some NASH‐HCC‐WT animals at eight weeks of age (3 out of 8) showed hepatic cytoplasmic and nuclear deposition of glycogen, symptom of worse glycaemic control. STZ‐treated mice exhibit hyperglycaemia throughout their entire life without differences in fasting blood sugar (FBS) between WT and Spp1−/− mice at 4 and 6 weeks of age (Figure 8C). However, OPN deficiency was associated with slightly though significantly reduced FBS (Figure 8C) and also with higher numbers of intact Langerhans islets (Figure 8E) and increased plasma insulin levels (Figure 8F) in 8‐week‐old NASH‐HCC mice. Moreover mRNA expression of FOXO1 was markedly reduced in NASH‐HCC‐Spp1−/− livers (Figure 8D), and G6pc and Pck1 genes, which encode key gluconeogenic enzymes and are transcriptional targets of FOXO1, were suppressed in OPN‐deficient livers (Figure 8D, statistically significant only for G6pc). Hence, higher insulin secretion and downregulation of hepatic FOXO1 and its target genes in NASH‐HCC Spp1−/− mice could contribute to the beneficial effects of OPN deficiency on glucose metabolism, as also to the detrimental effect on hepatic lipid accumulation and toxicity.
4. DISCUSSION
NAFL is a hallmark of metabolic syndrome, the committing step for the potential further evolution of NASH, fibrosis and liver cancer, and the forecasted future leading aetiology for HCC. Insights into the establishment and development of such a sequela of pathophysiological events may provide new interventional strategies focused on blocking, or at least delaying, this yet uncontrollable process. Unfortunately, the impossibility to sample patients´ livers at each stage of the disease and the lack of an animal model that faithfully mirrors the human pathological progression and aetiology made it impracticable until today. In the current study, we used a recently described mouse model, which sequentially develops NASH, fibrosis and HCC on a background of diabetes and obesogenic diet, to finally assess the role of OPN, a putative prognostic and therapeutic target for liver cancer, on the development of HCC in NAFLD. In spite of OPN’s well‐established inflammatory role, absence of OPN even worsened hepatic steatosis and fibrosis, but reduced dedifferentiation of HCCs and liver‐failure‐related mortality in mice on a background of hyperglycaemia and high‐fat diet. Even though OPN exhibits some beneficial effects in early NAFLD stages, it promotes dedifferentiation of HCC and organ failure probably through its pro‐inflammatory function. Most importantly, OPN ablation dissociates NASH‐fibrosis severity from overall survival and HCC malignant transformation. This study hence provides a basis for further translational research to target OPN in order to reduce liver‐related mortality in advanced NAFLD.
Deregulated hepatic NEFA influx covers a predominant role in human NAFLD. 32 , 33 An increased hepatic NEFA influx through specific membrane translocases, such as CD36, eventually induces enhanced hepatic steatosis also in the NASH‐HCC mouse model in use, upon genetic OPN deletion. Both experimental and clinical data show that CD36 expression positively correlates with liver fat deposition under conditions of elevated lipids and induces lipoapoptosis‐dependent inflammation and fibrosis. 34 , 35 Elevated lipid uptake is not excluded by the downregulation of hepatic Dgat1 and Dgat2 expression. Recently published data demonstrated that substrate flux, and not Dgat expression, is the dominant regulator of hepatic TG synthesis. 36 Moreover the concomitant increment in lipid uptake and reduction in FA esterification potential also explains the significant accumulation of DAGs in Spp1 −/− livers. CD36 expression is controlled by peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), and the accumulation of linoleic acid, a known source of PPARγ activating ligands, 37 might explain the significant Cd36 overexpression in Spp1 −/− hepatocytes. Furthermore, OPN was shown to positively impact on JNK downstream pathways, 38 and PPARγ activity can be inhibited by JNK through phosphorylation of Serine 84. 39 Therefore, lack of OPN might reduce JNK‐mediated suppression of PPARγ, resulting in increased Cd36 expression. In a considerably less hyperglycaemic model, which does not develop further fibrosis and HCC, it has been shown that lack of OPN protects from HFD‐induced hepatic steatosis, due to the preservation of adipose tissue function in obesity, hence preventing ectopic lipid accumulation in the liver. 16 , 17 In contrast, the model used here is primarily hyperglycaemic but not obese hence revealing the impact of hyperglycaemia in this process while excluding a potential involvement of a dysfunctioning adipose tissue.
Several experimental and clinical studies also indicate that OPN is involved in liver fibrogenesis. 40 , 41 However, previous research did not use models that replicate clinicopathological features of NAFL‐related fibrosis. In our model, hepatic fibrogenesis evolves from NAFL/NASH on a diabetes background. The lack of OPN not only worsened the steatotic and inflammatory phenotypes, but also enhanced hepatic collagen deposition in NASH‐HCC‐Spp1 −/− mice. We also provide evidence of enhanced apoptosis and proliferation rate in Spp1 −/− livers, phenomena that tightly correlate with exaggerated tissue repair and fibrogenesis. Overexpression of Timp1, a known inhibitor of the elastin‐degrading MMP12 and marker of tardive fibrosis, 42 further contributes to the more advanced fibrosis in Spp1 −/− livers. While OPN ablation was shown to reduce leptin‐induced hepatic fibrosis in vitro and in vivo, 40 and ductal reaction and fibrosis in thioacetamide (TAA)‐treated mice, 43 the NASH‐HCC model, which closely mirrors the full development of human disease up to HCC, reveals that NASH‐fibrosis may even exaggerate in the absence of OPN, when hyperglycaemia and lipotoxicity are the driving forces.
Specific lipid metabolites are known to contribute to NASH‐HCC development. The significant accumulation of DAGs could be a cue for enhanced lipotoxicity‐induced hepatocellular apoptosis in NASH‐HCC‐Spp1 −/− animals. The significant enrichment in DAG species containing palmitic and linoleic acid in lipid droplets further confirms the paramount effect of FA uptake as mechanism of increased steatosis in NASH‐HCC‐Spp1 −/− mice. The DAG and CER profiles obtained are in line with previous studies 44 , 45 and confirm again the worse non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease phenotype developed in the absence of OPN. To pinpoint the role of lipotoxicity on tissue‐specific and systemic inflammation, which is proposed by us as a key player in mortality and HCC dedifferentiation, we plan to perform direct measures of FA uptake by the liver and a detailed quantification of extrahepatic lipid distribution.
At 12 weeks of age, NASH‐HCC‐Spp1 −/− mice harboured significantly more spontaneous HCCs than WT. Previous reports on NASH‐HCC‐WT animals just identified simple hepatic nodules at this time point, 20 , 30 suggesting OPN as a key tumour suppressor factor in early HCC development. The increased proliferation rate probably compensating for enhanced apoptosis may have paved the way to early HCC development in Spp1 −/− mice. Interestingly, at 19 weeks of age, no significant differences in tumour size and number between genotypes were measured. However, tumours harboured in OPN‐expressing, WT animals reached a significantly higher level of dedifferentiation compared with HCCs grown in OPN‐deficient livers, which remained well‐differentiated. The specific overexpression of OPN at the HCC time point in livers of NASH‐HCC‐WT animals may hence be related to dedifferentiation of HCCs, and consequently increase tumour and metastasis‐related risks. Our data are in line with previous publications asserting that OPN mainly promotes late events in hepatocarcinogenesis, such as epithelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition (EMT), invasion and metastasis. 46 , 47 Based on our results, we also provide evidence that OPN induces HCC progression and dedifferentiation by modulating the hepatic inflammatory kinetics. The significant overexpression of pro‐inflammatory cytokines during the fibrosis time point seems to induce macrophage recruitment into the livers of Spp1 −/− mice. As shown by the relative expression of the main macrophage polarization markers, a comparable amount of them are M1‐ and M2‐activated, which may elicit anti‐tumour processes. At the HCC time point, this recruitment is significantly blunted in OPN‐deficient livers, indicating a possible resolution, or at least a good control of tumour development. In WT mice, on the other hand, significant overexpression of pro‐inflammatory cytokines occurs later in time, at the HCC time point in parallel with macrophage recruitment, at a time when OPN is also strongly overexpressed. The selective overexpression of the M2‐like macrophage polarization marker Mrc1 let us presuppose an accumulation of tumour‐associated macrophages (TAMs) 48 in NASH‐HCC WT livers. Hence, the adverse hepatic immunological milieu in later HCC development correlates with OPN expression, indicating again its detrimental role in the malignant outcome of liver cancers.
Even though OPN deficiency in NASH‐HCC mice induces stronger steatosis, steatohepatitis and fibrosis, it significantly protects against organ failure‐related death, which closely resembles human acute‐on‐chronic liver failure. Indeed, the development of acute on chronic liver failure occurs in the setting of systemic inflammation, the severity of which correlates with the number of organ failures and mortality. 31 As shown by plasma SAP levels of NASH‐HCC mice at the NAFL/NASH time point, systemic inflammation is dramatically higher in WT mice, most probably because of the ectopic lipid deposition and the consequent lipotoxicity and failure of non‐metabolic organs. Hence, OPN probably promotes liver failure due to its pro‐inflammatory action.
The liver has a fundamental role in maintaining hepatic and whole body glucose and lipid homeostasis: it senses these metabolic moieties and a plethora of hormones and other molecular mediators, integrates the signals and responds providing the right balance between glucose and lipid uptake, synthesis, storage and secretion. Our investigations show that lack of OPN protects against the HFD‐induced pancreatic lipotoxicity and improves therefore the overall metabolism and the hepatic function in Spp1−/− mice. Indeed, we showed that lack of OPN protects against cytoplasmic and nuclear glycogen deposition in hepatocytes. Since hepatocellular glycogen deposition is the principal clinical manifestation of glycogenic hepatopathy in humans, 49 we further investigated glycaemic control in vivo, which was improved in OPN‐deficient animals. Moreover the fact that fasting blood sugar showed significant improvement only after four weeks of HFD and that the amount of intact Langerhans islets was comparable between genotypes before the HFD challenge suggests that OPN deficiency did not interfere with initial STZ treatment but improved beta‐cell survival or recovery thereafter, maybe by reduced lipotoxicity. 50 , 51 On the other hand, upon sustained hyperglycaemia and hyperlipidaemia, the more responsive OPN‐deficient liver gets more severely damaged by the lipid overload, while protecting other organs, such as pancreas and possibly skeletal muscles, and preventing therefore systemic inflammation and mortality. On the contrary of OPN neutralizing studies by means of anti‐OPN antibodies, 15 , 19 , 52 completely depleting OPN action disrupts the paradigm that a more severe NASH phenotype will increase the risk of severe fibrosis development and in turn also liver‐related mortality. 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 Hence our study emphasizes a central role for osteopontin in NAFLD development and might guide future studies on therapeutic interventions based on this multifunctional cytokine.
In summary, on a hyperglycaemic background resembling insufficiently controlled diabetes, OPN exerts not only detrimental but also beneficial roles with respect to the development of NASH and progression to HCC. OPN is likely involved in the intrinsic control of excessive lipid uptake by the liver, and hence protects from lipotoxicity, apoptosis and consequent fibrosis and hepatocyte proliferation, which leads to differentiated HCC. On the other hand, OPN promotes metabolic dysregulations observed in metabolic syndrome, dedifferentiation of HCC and organ failure probably through its pro‐inflammatory function. This study hence demonstrates a bimodal Janus‐type action of OPN, being tumour‐protective at the early stage while tumorigenic in the progressive phase. Furthermore, OPN most likely plays a systemic role on inflammation and a hepatic role on HCC malignant transformation in NAFLD. Now as the roles of OPN in NASH‐HCC development are established, further research will focus on molecular mechanism of OPN action in early vs. late stages of this devastating disease in order to elucidate potential strategies for its prevention or treatment.
DECLARATION OF INTEREST
The authors declare no competing interests.
Supporting information
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Ludwig Wagner, Anna Fenzl, Martina Hackl, Francesca Bruschi, Matteo Tardelli, Nicole Auer, Victoria Kunczer, Clarissa Braun, Helga Schachner and Dagmar Lehner (all Medical University of Vienna, Austria) for excellent technical support. This work is supported by the CCHD doctoral program of the FWF (W1205‐B09), and the Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and Youth and the National Foundation for Research, Technology and Development (to TMS).
Nardo AD, Grün NG, Zeyda M, et al. Impact of osteopontin on the development of non‐alcoholic liver disease and related hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int. 2020;40:1620–1633. 10.1111/liv.14464
Handling Editor: Helen Reeves
REFERENCES
- 1. El–Serag HB, Rudolph KL. hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology and molecular carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:2557‐2576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Ertle J, Dechêne A, Sowa J‐P, et al. Non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease progresses to hepatocellular carcinoma in the absence of apparent cirrhosis. Int J Cancer. 2011;128:2436‐2443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Ekstedt M, Franzén LE, Mathiesen UL, et al. Long‐term follow‐up of patients with NAFLD and elevated liver enzymes. Hepatology. 2006;44:865‐873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Wilson CG, Tran JL, Erion DM, Vera NB, Febbraio M, Weiss EJ. Hepatocyte‐specific disruption of CD36 attenuates fatty liver and improves insulin sensitivity in HFD‐fed mice. Endocrinology. 2016;157:570‐585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Neuschwander‐Tetri BA. Hepatic lipotoxicity and the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: the central role of nontriglyceride fatty acid metabolites. Hepatology. 2010;52:774‐788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Feldstein AE, Canbay A, Angulo P, et al. Hepatocyte apoptosis and fas expression are prominent features of human nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:437‐443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Nomiyama T, Perez‐Tilve D, Ogawa D, et al. Osteopontin mediates obesity‐induced adipose tissue macrophage infiltration and insulin resistance in mice. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:2877‐2888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Bertola A, Deveaux V, Bonnafous S, et al. Elevated expression of osteopontin may be related to adipose tissue macrophage accumulation and liver steatosis in morbid obesity. Diabetes. 2009;58:125‐133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Wang YanHong, Mochida S, Kawashima R, et al. Increased expression of osteopontin in activated Kupffer cells and hepatic macrophages during macrophage migration in Propionibacterium acnes‐treated rat liver. J Gastroenterol. 2000;35:696‐701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Kawashima R, Mochida S, Matsui A, et al. Expression of osteopontin in Kupffer cells and hepatic macrophages and Stellate cells in rat liver after carbon tetrachloride intoxication: a possible factor for macrophage migration into hepatic necrotic areas. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;256:527‐531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Sahai A, Malladi P, Melin‐Aldana H, Green RM, Whitington PF. Upregulation of osteopontin expression is involved in the development of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in a dietary murine model. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2004;287:G264‐G273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Glass O, Henao R, Patel K, et al. Serum interleukin‐8, osteopontin, and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 Are associated with hepatic fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatol Commun. 2018;2:1344‐1355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Wen Y, Jeong S, Xia Q, Kong X. Role of osteopontin in liver diseases. Int J Biol Sci. 2016;12(9):1121‐1128. 10.7150/ijbs.16445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Kiefer FW, Zeyda M, Todoric J, et al. Osteopontin expression in human and murine obesity: extensive local up‐regulation in adipose tissue but minimal systemic alterations. Endocrinology. 2008;149:1350‐1357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Kiefer FW, Zeyda M, Gollinger K, et al. Neutralization of osteopontin inhibits obesity‐induced inflammation and insulin resistance. Diabetes. 2010;59:935‐946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Kiefer FW, Neschen S, Pfau B, et al. Osteopontin deficiency protects against obesity‐induced hepatic steatosis and attenuates glucose production in mice. Diabetologia. 2011;54:2132‐2142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Lancha A, Rodríguez A, Catalán V, et al. Osteopontin deletion prevents the development of obesity and hepatic steatosis via impaired adipose tissue matrix remodeling and reduced inflammation and fibrosis in adipose tissue and liver in mice. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e98398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Shang S, Plymoth A, Ge S, et al. Identification of osteopontin as a novel marker for early hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2012;55:483‐490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Kou G, Shi J, Chen L, et al. A bispecific antibody effectively inhibits tumor growth and metastasis by simultaneous blocking vascular endothelial growth factor A and osteopontin. Cancer Lett. 2010;299:130‐136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Fujii M, Shibazaki Y, Wakamatsu K, et al. A murine model for non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis showing evidence of association between diabetes and hepatocellular carcinoma. Med Mol Morphol. 2013;46:141‐152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Nagtegaal ID, Odze RD, Klimstra D, et al. The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Histopathology. 2020;76:182–188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. McCloy RA, Rogers S, Caldon CE, Lorca T, Castro A, Burgess A. Partial inhibition of Cdk1 in G 2 phase overrides the SAC and decouples mitotic events. Cell Cycle. 2014;13:1400‐1412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Kumashiro N, Erion DM, Zhang D, et al. Cellular mechanism of insulin resistance in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:16381‐16385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Folch J, Lees M, Sloane Stanley GH. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem. 1957;226:497‐509. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Guicciardi ME, Gores GJ. Apoptosis as a mechanism for liver disease progression. Semin Liver Dis. 2010;30:402‐410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Burdo TH, Wood MR, Fox HS. Osteopontin prevents monocyte recirculation and apoptosis. J Leukoc Biol. 2007;81:1504‐1511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Zhao H, Chen Q, Alam A, et al. The role of osteopontin in the progression of solid organ tumour. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Castello LM, Raineri D, Salmi L, et al. Osteopontin at the crossroads of inflammation and tumor progression. Mediators Inflamm. 2017;2017:1‐22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Sachdeva M, Chawla YK, Arora SK. Immunology of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Hepatol. 2015;7:2080‐2090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Takakura K, Koido S, Fujii M, et al. Characterization of non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis‐derived hepatocellular carcinoma as a human stratification model in mice. Anticancer Res. 2014;34:4849‐4855. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Arroyo V, Moreau R, Jalan R, Ginès P, EASL‐CLIF Consortium CANONIC Study . Acute‐on‐chronic liver failure: a new syndrome that will re‐classify cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2015;62:S131‐S143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Roden M. Mechanisms of disease: hepatic steatosis in type 2 diabetes—pathogenesis and clinical relevance. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2006;2:335‐348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Lomonaco R, Ortiz‐Lopez C, Orsak B, et al. Effect of adipose tissue insulin resistance on metabolic parameters and liver histology in obese patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2012;55:1389‐1397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Bechmann LP, Gieseler RK, Sowa J‐P, et al. Apoptosis is associated with CD36/fatty acid translocase upregulation in non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis. Liver Int. 2009;30:850‐859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Febbraio M, Guy E, Coburn C, et al. The impact of overexpression and deficiency of fatty acid translocase (FAT)/CD36. Mol Cell Biochem. 2002;239:193‐197. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Vatner DF, Majumdar SK, Kumashiro N, et al. Insulin‐independent regulation of hepatic triglyceride synthesis by fatty acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:1143‐1148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Marion‐Letellier R, Déchelotte P, Lacucci M, Ghosh S. Dietary modulation of peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor gamma. Gut. 2009;58:586‐593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Nicholas SB, Liu J, Kim J, et al. Critical role for osteopontin in diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2010;77:588‐600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Gelman L, Michalik L, Desvergne B, Wahli W. Kinase signaling cascades that modulate peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptors. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2005;17:216‐222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Coombes JD, Choi SS, Swiderska‐Syn M, et al. Osteopontin is a proximal effector of leptin‐mediated non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) fibrosis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1862:135‐144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Huang W, Zhu G, Huang M, Lou G, Liu Y, Wang S. Plasma osteopontin concentration correlates with the severity of hepatic fibrosis and inflammation in HCV‐infected subjects. Clin Chim Acta. 2010;411:675‐678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Pellicoro A, Aucott RL, Ramachandran P, et al. Elastin accumulation is regulated at the level of degradation by macrophage metalloelastase (MMP‐12) during experimental liver fibrosis. Hepatology. 2012;55:1965‐1975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Wang X, Lopategi A, Ge X, et al. Osteopontin induces ductular reaction contributing to liver fibrosis. Gut. 2014;63:1805‐1818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Jelenik T, Kaul K, Séquaris G, et al. Mechanisms of insulin resistance in primary and secondary nonalcoholic fatty liver. Diabetes. 2017;66:2241‐2253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Preuss C, Jelenik T, Bódis K, et al. A new targeted lipidomics approach reveals lipid droplets in liver, muscle and heart as a repository for diacylglycerol and ceramide species in non‐alcoholic fatty liver. Cells. 2019;8:277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Iqbal J, McRae S, Banaudha K, Mai T, Waris G. Mechanism of hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐induced osteopontin and its role in epithelial to mesenchymal transition of hepatocytes. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:36994‐37009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 47. Iqbal J, McRae S, Mai T, Banaudha K, Sarkar‐Dutta M, Waris G. Role of hepatitis C virus induced osteopontin in epithelial to mesenchymal transition, migration and invasion of hepatocytes. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e87464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 48. Scodeller P, Simón‐Gracia L, Kopanchuk S, et al. Precision targeting of tumor macrophages with a CD206 binding peptide. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Krishnan B, Babu S, Walker J, Walker AB, Pappachan JM. Gastrointestinal complications of diabetes mellitus. World J Diabetes. 2013;4:51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Lee Y, Hirose H, Ohneda M, Johnson JH, McGarry JD, Unger RH. Beta‐cell lipotoxicity in the pathogenesis of non‐insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus of obese rats: impairment in adipocyte‐beta‐cell relationships. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:10878‐10882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. El‐Assaad W, Buteau J, Peyot M‐L, et al. Saturated fatty acids synergize with elevated glucose to cause pancreatic beta‐cell death. Endocrinology. 2003;144:4154‐4163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Ye Q‐H, Qin L‐X, Forgues M, et al. Predicting hepatitis B virus–positive metastatic hepatocellular carcinomas using gene expression profiling and supervised machine learning. Nat Med. 2003;9:416‐423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Ratziu V. Back to Byzance: Querelles byzantines over NASH and fibrosis. J Hepatol. 2017;67:1134‐1136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Younossi ZM, Stepanova M, Rafiq N, et al. Pathologic criteria for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: Interprotocol agreement and ability to predict liver‐related mortality. Hepatology. 2011;53:1874‐1882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Ekstedt M, Hagström H, Nasr P, et al. Fibrosis stage is the strongest predictor for disease‐specific mortality in NAFLD after up to 33 years of follow‐up. Hepatology. 2015;61:1547‐1554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Angulo P, Kleiner DE, Dam‐Larsen S, et al. Liver fibrosis, but no other histologic features, is associated with long‐term outcomes of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2015;149:389–397.e10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.